Error - Measures are already assigned to position (investment order )

Hi,
we need to delete investment orders from the investment profile(IM22). When i am trying to do from lower level i get the message "
Error - Measures are already assigned to position
Message no. AP086
Diagnosis
You have tried to move the partial tree with top item J290010035BS. However, budget or plan values have already been entered for it.
System Response
To avoid inconsistencies, the transfer is not carried out.
May i know the possible reasons and what are aspects we need to consider before deleting the investment orders
Best regards
Medha

Hi.
Guido
Thanks a lot for your reply. But our investment orders are distuributed already with budget. I think the note applies if the budget is not distributed to this fiscal year.
Thanks in advance
Medha

Similar Messages

Error : you are not assigned to a position

Hi Seniors,
I am getting below error though I have assigned proper position in R/3 and also I have linked this with communication info type 105 using PA30. I am not able to see my data in portal.
Please help...
Regards,
Ritu

Hi Ranjith/ Luke,
I re-checked the OM- PA configuration and again try to maintain A012 relationship as well... but again the same error ... " You are not assigned to a position "
Please help
Regards,
Ritu

All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system

Hi SRM Gurus ,
While Replicating the Vendor from the backend ' I am getting this Error as +'All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system'+ . I have checked the number Range both in backend and SRM its fine we have replicated lot of Vendors allready without any error .
My analysis :
we have the same vendor Created with diffrenet accounting group with diffrent address in SRM allready . But we are now created new vendor with new accounting group and new address we are trying to Replicate the same in SRM but we are getting that error , Is there any way i can do the sucess full replication with out any error.
The correct answer will be rewarded accordingly .
Thanks & Regards
Ganesh Sagar

We had a problem with number ranges

BBPGETVD - All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system

Hi together,
My target
I'd like to replicate vendors from R/3 with the same vendor numbers to the organizational structure of SRM.
I execute the transaction: BBPGETVD.
Settings:
System: TERCLNT303 (defined Backendsystem)
Supplier: 4100000005
Object Id: 50000667 (PPOMV_BBP)
x Only Transfer R/3 numbers
Start Transfer
error message "All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system"
If I select: If R/3 Number assignment is not possible: Internal Number Assigmente then the system works and create:
a) BP-Number in table: BUT000
b) R/3 Vendor Number in table: VENMAP.
Why I can't create same vendor numbers in tables: BUT000 and VENMAP ?
Kind Regards
Edited by: Hermann-Josef Wessels on Oct 31, 2010 9:00 PM
Edited by: Hermann-Josef Wessels on Oct 31, 2010 9:15 PM
Edited by: Hermann-Josef Wessels on Oct 31, 2010 9:54 PM

Please can some one guide me here . I am having issue in replicating vendors this was working fine a couple of days back however it has just stopped working .
The error it gives me is the same as
all backend descriptions are already assigned in the system I am maintaining the below number range please can some guide me
below is the SPRO path .
Cross-application components -> SAP Business Partner -> Business Partner -> Basic Settings -> Number Ranges and Groupings
Can some one also let me know where to check in ECC ??
01    0000001999    0000009999    0
AB    0000001000    0000001998    0
MD    9000000000    9999999999    0

Incident management error: You are not assigned a Business Partner

Hi
I am facing a problem while creating message as below
error: You are not assigned a Business Partner
I created the BP. which has clear identification too.
Even this BP is maintained as Employee too.
Expecting ur valuable suggestions.
Regards,
Siva

Hi
Was this issue ever resolved?
I have the same problem.
I have business partners, also created as employees with their user id held in the Identification tab of the employee view in BP.
In the business partner Identification tab, they have the system ID>Installation No>client>user id maintained
When I go into solman_workcenter I see the message 'you are not assigned a business partner' and I cannot see any of the tickets assigned to me.
Has anyone had the same issue and resolved it?
Thanks for your help.
Ashley

ERROR: "You are not assigned to a role" in BEx

Hi,
I have a user BEXUSER. In PFCG, I have assigned this user to a role ZR_USER_ROLE.
However, when I tried to open a query in BEx Anlyzer through Open > Workbooks > Roles toolbar, I could not find any workbooks assigned to this user.
Next, I tried to open a query using Open > Queries toolbar, I chose a query and tried to click Enter in Role icon. However, I am prompted with a message saying "You are not assigned to a role".
How is this possible when I have already assigned this user to a role. I have checked PFCG and confirmed that the particular role contains this user. Can someone explain about this?
Thanks

I am getting this exact same error, and the values that I have set in my query developer's job role are the following :
S_USER_AGR
ACTIVITY = 01, 02, 06, 22
ROLE NAME = {list of roles that the user should be able to save queries to}
S_USER_TCD
TRANSACTION CODE = RRMX
The user still receives the "you are not assigned to a role" error message when pressing the "save to role" button for a workbook.
In the ST01 authorizations trace, I see that the user is FAILING the authorization check for S_USER_AGR, but is failing the check for role names that he / she not supposed to modify.
So those failures are good, but they seem to prevent from saving the workbook to any role ...
How can it be setup so that the user can save workbooks to roles that were inteded to be saved to, without getting the "your are not assigned to a role" error when trying ?

CS6 Design and Web Premium - Install Error "You are already running another installer,"

Hi
I have just downloaded CS6 Design and Web Premium and I have been having problems running the Adobe Installer on a Windows 8 HP laptop. The Adobe installer gets 75% way through the setup process and then stops with error message "Installerfailed to initialise".
I have run Adobe Support Advisor and the error message is "cpsid_82829s6: "You are already running another installer," bootstrapper error has occurred."
I have looked at the FAQ's and have done the following
I have checked System Resources -> Process and I can't see any other setup programmes running
I have run CS5 Cleaner tool and cleared out any older versions of adobe products
Rebooted the laptop
Tried running the Adobe Installer and the same error messages appear.
Submitted/packaged the Adobe Support Adviser - 40-85436-165301042013
I did prevousily have CS6 Cloud Trial running on the Laptop but all of the porgramms have been uninstalled and the CS5 Cleaner Toll appears to have cleared any remaining elements.
I would be grateful for some help and advice in sorting this out.
Kind regards
Steve

Hi
I have hopfully attached a PDF with screen shots of the process.
Hopefully will be of some help in resolving the problem.
Kind regards
Steve

Sign in error "You are already signed in"

Hi, when I want to login it I got this error
We can’t open Skype. You are already signed in on this computer. Please sign out and try again.
It's confusing, I don't now how to log out, I sign in again with my Microsoft account and I got this again
PLEASE HELP I NEED IT FOR COMUNICATE TO MY FRIENDS!
edit : before this, I can log in to my skype simply
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Try to reset all Skype settings.
Quit Skype or use Windows Task Manager to kill any Skype.exe process. Go to Windows Start and in the Search/Run box type %appdata% and then press Enter or click the OK button. The Windows File Explorer will pop up. There locate a folder named “Skype”. Rename this folder to something different, e.g. Skype_old.
Next go to Windows Start and in the Search/Run box type %temp%\skype and then press Enter or click the OK button. Delete the DbTemp folder.
Restart Skype.
N.B. If needed, you will still be able to re-establish your call and chat history. All data is still saved in the Skype_old folder.

How to add new Measures in WEBOSA (Measures are already present in Mviews but needed to be mapped to cube)?

Hi
I am using WEB OSA (Oracle Sales Analyzer) cubes.
Now we had a requirement to add new measure to the existing cube. In the materialized views we successfully added the new column. But coming to cubes we are unable to map the new measure to View. We are using Express Relational Access Administrator for modelling the cubes.
In Cubes I created the measure. and in view also i added the new measure in data base. but in administrator i am not seeing the newly added column.
need ur help on the same.
Thanks in Advance
Sravan.

Hi Sravan,
My memory of these Oracle products are a little fuzzy since we stopped doing development on RAA/RAM back in the year 2000 - exactly 15 years ago!
I recall that the Relational Access Administrator i.e. the RAA admin tool stores the sources i.e. Tables or Views that you include in your project as a set
of metadata in the Warehouse Metadata tables or known as the "WH" tables. I believe your issue is one that the definition of the view as stored in the
WH metadata tables does not include your new measure view column. I believe there is a way to "update" the definition of the view as stored in the
WH metadata tables. I believe there is a wizard that you can run that will show the current and new version of the source table or view and allow the
RAA to update the source definition to the new definition. At this point, you can hopefully map your model measure to the source view column and then
run a new build.
Out of curiosity, please provide the versions you are running for:
1) The windows O/S that you are running the Express Relational Access Administrator
2) The version of the Express Relational Access Administrator
3 The Oracle database version
Finally, please send me a note as to why you are still using this very old (but good) technology. Another words, do you feel the
more recent offerings from Oracle do not satisfy your business requirements or some other reasons for not modernizing your
applications?
Thanks,
David

Getting Error Excise Invoice already caputred in another purchase order

Hi,
I'm facing error while making GR. It's a Stock transfer scenario, where one plant transfers material to another plant. The supplying plant create excise invoice after 643 movement type. The receiving plant first creates GR with 103 movement type then does 105 and captures and posts the excise invoice. I get this error while doing 105.
Can any one explain the reason. I have checked, but it is not been captured any where else..
Regards
Nikhil

hi Nikhil,
The error clearly states the the excise invoice is already been captured in some other po. Kindly check it up in either J1IEX or table J_1IEXCHDR
prasanna

Investment order settlement- assignment field with order number in GL code

We are settling the investment order to the concerned asset and in reco account of the concerned asset it has to update assignment field with Investment order number from which order settlement was happend.
For example I am booking all the expences to 1000 GL account code for investment order and I am settling to 2000 GL code.
Investment order number is coming in 1000 GL code in fbl3n and for 2000 asset class (Reco 2000 GL code) it it not showing IO number.
We want IO number in 2000 GL code line item.
Do the the need full. It is very urgent..........
Edited by: sudhakara reddy jakku on May 31, 2008 8:09 AM

hi
when u are seeing gl line item .onse u enterd inthat screen change layout screen tab will be ther u plz see the IO filed and select that . to next saide it will give urs IO no.also

WBS Element vs investment order

Good Day,
Please can someone explain the following..................
I have CO objects a WBS element and an investment order and I have posted budgeted values to these CO Objects. I have posted actual values to these Co object via the MM and FI-AA module.
When I display the budgeted values for the WBS Element and the invesment order for the fields BPJA-WTJHR the vaules are positive. Once the actual values are posted to the WBS Element and investment order the values are displayed differently on the table COSP-(WTG001-WTG016).
For the WBS Element the values are dispalyed as negative on table COSP -(WTG001-WTG016) and for the investment order the values are displayed as postive but both values for the different CO objects are expenditure which has occured via the MM and FI-AA modules Therefore can someone please explain to me why these values are displayed differently yet the budgeted values are displayed the same.
Your soonest response would be appreciated.
Kind Regards
Ropetra

Hi
please gop through this notes it may be help full for you...............
Planning and Budgeting Measures
Use
Using this function, you can plan and budget investment measures, even if they are not already assigned to an investment program.
Integration
All of the planning and budgeting functions of orders or projects are at your disposal for the corresponding measures. For more information, see the documentation for the R/3 components, Internal Orders (CO-OM-OPA) and Project System (PS) .
Orders or WBS elements that are assigned to investment programs cannot receive their overall budget by means of the budgeting functions in CO and PS, when the Budget distribution indicator is set in the program position to which they are assigned. Instead, they are limited to receiving their overall budget only by means of the budgeting functions in Investment Management.
Prerequisites
Certain restrictions apply when an investment program type is entered in the budget profile of an order or WBS element. When this is the case, the order or WBS element cannot receive overall budget unless you assign it (or a higher-level WBS element ) to an investment program position. Until you make this assignment to a program position, the fields for the overall budget and/or annual budget for orders or WBS elements are not ready for input and cannot be changed.
Activities
To plan or budget orders, choose Internal orders ® Planning ® Overall values ® Change or Budget ® Original budget ® Change.
To plan or budget WBS elements, choose Investment projects ® Planning ® Total costs ® Change or Budgeting ® Original budget ® Change.

Storage Location Error duing GR of Subcontarct for The Sales Order Stock.

HI ,
Is there any settings to avoid individual entry of Storage Location field for the child components during the Goods Receipt from Subcontractor for the Sales Order Stock.
As per SAP standard , I have created Separate storage location for Sales order stock components as the Stock provided to vendor . While receiving the header component , System showing error to enter storage location for all the BOM component s . My Requirement is , Storage location should come automatically for the child component while receiving the Header Component.
Yogesh.K.

Hi Jurgen,
He's right, the posting is not a bug.
In case of MTO scenario, if components are managed in the sales order / project stock system withdraw them from storage location.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/4d/2b90b043ad11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
The subcontracting orders are account-assigned to a sales order or a WBS element. Thus, the components are not transferred (using a transfer posting) to the "stock of material provided to vendor" but are directly withdrawn from the sales order stock or the project stock at the time of the goods receipt.
Since the components are not transferred to the "stock of material provided to vendor", we recommend that you use a transfer posting to transfer the provided components to a new storage location (for example, 9999). This enables you to obtain an overview of those stocks that are physically located at the subcontractor. This information is particularly important when you carry out a physical inventory of the sales order stocks and project stocks.
Cs.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 5, 2010 7:17 PM

Error 'Document 1000 0000000001 2014 already assigned' while posting invoice reduction

Hi Gurus,
here is my situation:
I have created sch.agreement,
GR done and posted IR.
Now created credit memo through MIRO to reverse my previous invoice.
then posted IR(consider number as 0000000001) with higher price.
then this invoice was rejected by buyer due to higher price.
now when i am trying to post this invoice through invoice reduction i am getting an error F5-152: 'Document 1000 0000000001 2014 already assigned'.
Please note that here the number range customized as external and user dont want to change it to internal.
So, Please help me to solve this issue ASAP.

Hi Sankar, By looking at your issue, It seems number range has been maintained in such a way where MM Document number = FI Document number where in FI External number range is maintained for RE document type. If this is the case, first check whether Document mentioned above is already generated in FI.(check in FB03) or it is already available in MM.(check in MIR4) By comparing the Number range of FI and MM you can get an idea in which number range problem exists. Then go to that respective internal and change the completed number range by one number so that this mismatch can be set right. But before changing ensure that above said pre-requisites are met. Regards Karthikeyan G

Base unit of measure can not be changed since EAN is already assigned.

Hi,
We would like to change the UOM from EA to SET .In order to tag MM # as BOM Header and ZCEN (Serial number profile)but the error massage appears as below print screensystem is not allowing to do so ,throwing following error message:
"Base unit of measure can not be changed since EAN is already assigned."
Could you help to resolve the same.
Thanks,
Amit

Hi,
Thats correct you must be getting Error message M3 341 ,
EAN international article number is tied with material number in basic data view with EAN Category and seperate number range
EAN is a standardized unit that uniquely identifies a material relating to a unit of measure or type of packaging.
The International Article Number (EAN) is assigned by the manufacturer of the material. In this case, the EAN identifies the
manufacturer uniquely. A company can assign EANs using "in-store" numbering techniques known only to the company.
If you still want to change UOM you need to first remove the EAN assigned..please explore further if you have internal number range
for EAN or external ..etc
Thanks
Diwakar

Error - Measures are already assigned to position (investment order )

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for