Error: Reason codes with automatic charge-off are not permitted here(F-28)

Hi All
I creted a reason code in obxl t-code and assigned a gl code in OBXL transaction code, But when I am trying to clear a payment with reason code in F-28, System is throwing the following error..Can some one tell me why i am getting this error?
Reason codes with automatic charge-off are not permitted here
Message no. F5605
Diagnosis
The reason code entered is designed to ensure that the payment difference amount is posted to an account specially set up for this purpose. Postings of this nature usually require additional specifications (e.g. tax code, business area). If the difference stems from a single open item, the necessary specifications can be taken from that item. In the case that led to this error message, however, the difference does not stem soley from one item, which means that this method cannot be used.
System Response
The reason code entered is not accepted.
Procedure
You can either select a different reason code, which would create a new open item for the customer or vendor OR write off the difference using the function Charge off diff.. This function either takes you into a pre-configured account assignment model or into the document overview. From here you can enter the required difference postings.

Hi Venkata,
It seems while entering the payment (partial payment / residual items) ... you are clearing multiple items with differences. (e.g. if the difference amount is $30, then may the difference consists of two invoices underpaid by $15 each). In this scenario, F-28 doesn't know which additional account assignment fields should be picked up ... hence the error.
First of all, to validate that this indeed is the case, try clearing a payment with the same reason code where difference can be attributed to a single invoice. If you still get an error, then there is some other problem.
Then, to take care of a the business scenario where the difference can indeed be due to multiple documents, select "charge off difference" option and create an entry to post the difference as necessary.
HTH,
Manish Patel
Sr. SAP Solutions Consultant

Similar Messages

FB50L error: Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted

Dear All
I need your help.
I am trying to do some adjustment to GR/IR clearing account in Non-leading ledger. Since for this account open item management is ticked, I am getting an error message 'Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted'.
Now I have checked the forum to find some solution...but does not fit my requirement.
I cannot create a new account. I cannot change the existing account. I tried OBA5, but the message persists.
I also checked the notes.
Appreciate a response on how the post to open item managed accounts in non-leading ledger.
Regards
Kunaal

Hi Kunaal
Usually, OIM accounts are not allowed for Non Leading Ledger postings... With EhP4 or 5, i guess, a new feature is added in GL Master whereby you can specify that a GL will be OIM for Leading Ledger and Not OIM for a Non Leading Ledger
Regards
Kavita Agarwal

Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted Messag

HI All,
Me activiated New GL. and when I am trying to post the
document, I am getting the below error.
The GL used 200100 is Cash A/c (40)
Cr Eq Share Capital A/c (50)
As Cash A/c requires Clearing, I have activated "Open Item Management".
Can you advice me why Its giving me the below mentioned error.
Thanks
Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted
Message no. FAGL_POST_SERVICE012
Diagnosis
You use G/L account 200100 in company code RLIF with open item
management. However, postings are not permitted to G/L accounts in
individual ledgers with open item management.
Procedure
If you have not yet made any postings to this account and if the
account is to be used for closing processes in non-leading ledgers,
deactivate the Open Item Management indicator in the company code data
for the G/L account.
Thanks,
Niranjan Yandamuri

Hi,
Please, refer to note 1646466 for the info on this message.
Regards,
Eli

Posting to gl a/c with open item management are not permitted.

hello,
When i run FAGL_FC_VAL it display the report and generate the batch input session.
But when i run the session the error massage appear -
"posting to gl a/c with open item management are not permitted."
When i post the same gl mannually, it doesn't show any error.
The Same Problem appear when i run the session generated from FAGLF101- the regrouping program.
Can any body give some idea, what should be done.
Thanx
Subodh

Hello this is chandu,
When u run the fc val it posts the ex gain or loss to respective a/cs.Means those a/cs are not B/S a/cs.Only B/S a/cs we select open item management which r require to maintain on OI management basis.
So try to maintain other a/cs for ex gain and loss y bcoz once u post any transaction in those a/cs which r created already on O Item mgnt basis u cannot change that again.
Then assign those a/cs to automatic postings and run the rc val again
May it will be useful to u
Thank u

Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted in ASKB

Hi Gurus,
I have the error FAGL_POST_SERVICE012 'Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted' when i run the transaction ASKB. The very strange thing is that in table APERB_ITEMS for this company code there isn't any record. My questions are:
1. The ASKB posts only if the APERB_ITEMS is populated?
2. If yes, Why the ASKB wants to create postings on this company code?
3. If no, which are the logic conditions that include a asset in the ASKB execution?
4. If the logic is correct, how i can to run the ASKB on OI accounts?
Thanks in advance,
Best Regards,
Emanuele

Hi ,
I believe you know why do you run transaction code ASKB if not please see below
The report evaluates all asset transactions since the last run. Unlike the periodic depreciation posting program, the APC posting run is not tied to a certain accounting period. It generates one document per posting period and depreciation area. That means that asset values are summarized for various account groups in one document. Document number assignment is external. You have to enter the document type in Customizing for Asset Accounting.
There are various possible ways of posting APC values:
To an account set within the original company code
To an account set of an alternative company code
To an account set directly in a special ledger
The account set can be determined from a different depreciation area.
Derived depreciation areas can be treated as real depreciation areas. This means that the system posts APC differences rather than special reserves, as was the case up to now.
During a test run, the system completes all accounting checks (for example, budgetary control of objects belonging to Funds Management).
While doing above system reads and update table APERB_ITEMS . If you look to Program for ASKB is RAPERB2000 and if you take your ABAper help to under the coding he will tell you that is program use APERB_ITEMS to update and read.
MANY THANKS
REGARDS
Preeti Agarwal

Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted

Dear all,
i am getting one error FB01L ledger specific posting for ledger group L2 ledger (IFRS) error is "postingst o GL accounts with open item management are not permitted " i am posting both gl accounts are balance sheet account, please help me how to resolve the problem .
Message no. FAGL_POST_SERVICE012
Reregards
rajashekhar

Dear all,
Thanks for reply, The error message appears FAGL_POST_SERVICE012 because it is generally not permitted to use the O/I managed account as an adjustment account.It is not possible to post on Individual Ledger (on a Leading or non-leading) on OI Account. This is for your informations
We want to post ledger specific for L2 ledger i am getting above error can help me how to sovle the problem , otherwise any alternaitve solution for posting L2 Ledger

Error:An item with no delivery quantity is not permitted.

Hello,
We are receiving an error:
Only 0.00 UNT of material XXXX available.
An item with no delivery quantity is not permitted. Item will be deleyed.
This material has the following details:
Material Group: Asset
Material Type: VKHM
Ref. Mat Type: HAWA
Item Cat Grp: NORM
Industry Sector: A - Plant engin./ construction
I believe asset is not quantity based. My questions are:
1. Why is it when creating delivery, quantityis necessary. However,this was configured as asset?
2. How can i put/add stock in asset?
- In Define Attributes for material types, i searched for VKHM, and it was already maintained.
- Area for quantity/ value updating: both were ticked: By Valuation Area for Quantity and Value Updating.
- When i go to the folder on the left: Quantity/Value updating; Quantity Updating ang Value Updating were both ticked for Valuation area: 0001, material type: vkhm.
- i also tried to tick Quantity Updating and Value Updating for valuation area (plant name). Butnothing happens.
Thanks in advance for all of the help.

In this case, the reason why the delivery can not be created due to the first error:
Only 0.00 UNT of material XXXX available.
This error has number VL150, which means there is no avaiable stock when you create the delivery. To check how many
avaiblable stock you have, you need to check it in transaction CO09. usually for delivery, you should use check rule B.
In co09, if the ***. ATP qty is 0 or negative, you will get above error and the delivery can not be created. For more information regarding this error VL150, check note 153355 and 1481133.

Posting to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted

Hi all,
I am trying run run foreign currency valuation in SM35, but the system prompt me error in FBB1 saying that posting to an open item management account is not permitted. I try to unchecked the 'open item management' flag in 'Change G/L account centrally', but another error message tell me that 'the account does not have a balance of zero'...
Kindly help, thanks

Hi
If you have balance in GL account you can't make it as "open item management"
make zero balance
block the account for further postings
run RFSEPA02 in SE38
then unblock the account
transfer the balance from the dummy account
Regards
Prasad

Error- Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted

Hi,
Can't we post to a GL, which is open item managed, in a non-leading ledger (statutory ledger)? We get this error when we try to post an entry, in the statutory ledger, to a GL that is open item managed.
Can anybody explain this, please?
Regards,
Mike

This is due to a design with the new GL.
In the new G/L accounting, when you use a particular ledger or ledger group, you can no longer make a direct ledger specific posting to accounts managed on an open item basis or to accounts with an account type not equal to 'S'.
You need to do posting with ledger group blank, which updates all the ledgers. The idea is, for open item accounts, all the ledgers should be in sync. for open item accounts IFRS and Local GAAP values are never different.
If you are doing this to do some correction posting while doing year end posting or migration for example. (A typical example is when an account is made open item managed at a later date). You need to change temporarily message control using transaction SE91 to force ledger specific postings to OI accounts

ASKBN - Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitte

Hi All!
I have a problem: I run the transaction ASKBN (periodic asset postings) and receive the message about error: "Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted".
Please let me know how correctly run the transaction?
Thank.

Hi,
if you would have posted this information with your opening post, it would have been more helpful. How should the community know this detail?
Regards,
Markus

Reason code with post with different GL account

Dear All,
Help me to understand the following
1.Reason code wise standard report
2.customer/vendor payment difference want to post separate gl with Reason code wise
3.Partal /Residual payment with different gl with reason code.
4.Invoice is posted customer refuses to Pay.
How to simulate the scenario without using dispute Management/Credit Management.
Guide me is there any way to simulate the above issues with reason code.
5.Suggest me is there any configuration other that OBBE/OBEX
Reason code and post with diffent GL
Regards,
CS

Hi CS,
1.Reason code wise standard report.
A. We can get the Reason code wise Report Customer line item Report FBL5N @ select screen and out put screen with change layout.
2.customer/vendor payment difference want to post separate gl with Reason code wise
A.Configuration OBBE we can configure, with the tick "C", and OBXL we can assign GL a/c and rules activate Reason code.
3.Partial /Residual payment with different gl with reason code.
A. while posting F-28 , or F-53 difference amount post in the field we have to field Reason code and Differences amount and simulate,
Note:If we select Reason code xxx with "C" in this scenario system will through error, we have to use other reason code except "C".
Each reason code we can configure according to our requirements.
4.Invoice is posted customer refuses to Pay.
No idea in sap.
Rds,
@nil

Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code (Message no. FS206)

Hi Guys,
I am facing very critical issue on down Payment request, to process with saperate Tax Value.
We are supporting on Roll-out for Germany. We have implemented all standard SAP processes in the Project. We have also implemented many interfaces and one of the Interface is Sabrix Tax Engine (Tax Jurisdiction Code).
As per the Germany legal requirement, the Tax has to get calculated whenever the funds gets transfered from one Bank Account to Another Bank Account.
Coming to the issue: In the Customer Down Payment scenario, we are creating the Down payment request for Customer and as per Germany local requirement the Tax of 19% has to get calculated on Down payment.
For an Example: We have the Sales Order Contract Value of 100,000.00 EUR and we are creating the Down Payment reqeust of 10% which is 10000 EUR + Tax 19% 1900 EUR.
We are trying to post the Down Payment request in F-37 and we get the issue "Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code". This error is appearing due to Sabrix Tax engine (Tax Jurisdiction Code) has implemented in our System.
We have gone through the SAP notes 97288 and 213567 and understood that the Standard SAP does not support us to post the Down Payment request with Separate Tax Value, when the External Tax Engine has implemented.
I request you to suggest me, if you have already seen this issue in any of your Projects and fixed through the work-around solution. We have been working on work-around since 2 weeks, however no result.
Below is the error message:
Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code
Message no. FS206

HI Preeti,
Thanks for your response. We have already seen the similar SAP notes and the SAP notes explains that the "Down pmnts with taxes cannot be done along with with jur.code". The only solution is to post the DP without Tax.
However there might be some workaround which can be done in SAP, to process the Down Payment/Advance Payments with Tax Value along with Jurisdiction Code. I would like to know this.
Did any one seen this case in your experiece, if yes, what is the work-around solution?.
Need your help guys!,...
Regards,
Damodar Naidu

[Execute SQL Task] Error: Executing the query "DECLARE_@XMLA nvarchar(3000) ,__@DateSerial nvarch..." failed with the following error: "Incorrect syntax near '-'.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly,

Hi
DECLARE @XMLA nvarchar(3000)
, @DateSerial nvarchar(35);
-- Change date to format YYYYMMDDHHMMSS
SET @DateSerial = CAST(GETDATE() AS DATE);
--SELECT @DateSerial
Set @XMLA =
N' <Batch xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysis services/2003/engine">
<ErrorConfiguration xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ddl2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2"
xmlns:ddl2_2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2" xmlns:ddl100_100="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100" xmlns:ddl200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200"
xmlns:ddl200_200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200">
<KeyErrorLimit>-1</KeyErrorLimit>
<KeyNotFound>IgnoreError</KeyNotFound>
<NullKeyNotAllowed>IgnoreError</NullKeyNotAllowed>
</ErrorConfiguration>
<Parallel>
<Process xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ddl2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2" xmlns:ddl2_2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2"
xmlns:ddl100_100="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100" xmlns:ddl200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200" xmlns:ddl200_200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200"
xmlns:ddl300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300" xmlns:ddl300_300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300">
<Object>
<DatabaseID>MultidimensionalProject5</DatabaseID>
<CubeID>giri</CubeID>
<MeasureGroupID>Fact Internet Sales</MeasureGroupID>
</Object>
<Type>ProcessFull</Type>
<WriteBackTableCreation>UseExisting</WriteBackTableCreation>
</Process>
</Parallel>
</Batch>';
EXEC (@XMLA) At SHALL-PCAdventureWorksDw ;
iam executive the query when iam getting below error.
[Execute SQL Task] Error: Executing the query "DECLARE
@XMLA nvarchar(3000)
, @DateSerial nvarch..." failed with the following error: "Incorrect syntax near '-'.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set
correctly, or connection not established correctly.
how to solve this error;
please help me

What are you trying to do? What sort of data source is SHALL-PCAdventureWorksDw?
When you use EXEC() AT, I would execpt to see an SQL string to be passed to EXEC(), but you are passing an XML string????
If you explain why you think this would work in the first place, maybe we can help you.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

TS1702 My youtube app is no longer working on my iphone 3. Others, with the same phone, are not having the problem. It works occassionally, but it's unpredictable. I've updated phone software, deleted the app, re-downloaded the app, turned the phone off a

My youtube app is no longer working on my iphone 3. Others, with the same phone, are not having the problem. It works occassionally, but it's unpredictable. I've updated phone software, deleted the app, re-downloaded the app, turned the phone off and on...nothing.

You may have debris in your headphone jack blocking the sensor. Try blowing hard on the jack, and inserting/removing your headphones quickly multiple times to clear it.

Since installing Lion I keep getting the error message 'there was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type 'file:" are not supported"' How can I fix this?

since installing Lion I keep getting the error message 'there was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type 'file:" are not supported"' How can I fix this?

A Davey1 wrote:
Not a nice answer!
Posting "Check the 'More like this'" area and not simply providing the answer is a great way to make these groups worthless.
You're ignoring context. On the old Apple Discussion Groups I never posted replies like that, instead giving people relatively detailed answers. The new Apple Support Communities made things worse by introducing certain inefficiencies. Then came Lion. The flood of messages that came with Lion required a painful choice for any of the people who had been helping here: (1) Give quality responses to a few questions and ignore the rest. (2) When applicable, give a brief answer such as the one that you found objectionable. (3) Give up all the other normal activities of life and spend full time trying to answer questions here.
People who needed help with Lion problems seemed to have trouble discovering existing message threads that described how to solve their problems. I never posted the suggestion of "Check the 'More like this' area" without verifying that the help that the poster needed could be found there. Even doing that, what I posted saved me time that I could use to help someone else.
The people helping here are all volunteers. None of them is being paid for the time they spend here. They all have a life outside of Apple Support Communities. It's arrogant of you to demand that people helping here spend more time than they already do.

Error: Reason codes with automatic charge-off are not permitted here(F-28)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for