Evaluations and Evaluation structure

Hi Friends,
The business requirement is given below.
Our client is in fashion retailing and we are on IS retail. Requirement is to report Sales of articles ( material)by the season catrgory and season year (MARA-SAISO and MARA-SAISJ) fields which are maintained on the article (material) master.
We already have a self defined info structure which captures all information about sales for a sales office, sales org, Merchandise category (or material group in standard R/3), document number, date etc.
I created two new evaluation structure one for the table MARA with the above two fields as charactristics and quantity ( no of GR slips ) as key figure. Another evaluation structure was created which was based on the combination of the self defined info structure (which gives sales information) and the evaluation structure defined for MARA.I took all characteristics and key figures in the evaluation strucutre which were available in  info structure and the MARA structure created.
I created a new evaluation based on this combined evaluation structure but when I run the evaluation I do not get the desired report based on the season category/ season year.
Does any body have any idea where I could be going wrong and what needs to be corrected.
I also explored another idea of using the Report writer functionality directly based on the structures created above.So using the report group , report, key figure etc which I created I still was unable to get the desired information in form of a report.
So can anyone throw some more light on this.
Thanks in advance for your support.
REgards,
Kartik Shah

Recommend you post your question to the proper forum with a clear subject

Similar Messages

  • No system found for component and Evaluation system in the Project

    Hi Folks ,
    Im facing this problem when im trying to Execute the T-codes from Solar01 of the Transactins Tab by Selecting the Line item and clicking on Execute button. Following is the Error and there no logs for it.
    No system found for component and Evaluation system in the Project
    Even i have checked with the RFC settings and Logical components are right
    Please do suggest me - This is PRD issue . Try to do the needful .
    Thanks in Advance
    Amrita
    Edited by: Amrita Amrita on Dec 3, 2009 12:53 AM

    Hi all,
    I've had the same issue with regards to getting the error below when assigning transactions to a Blueprint business process.
    "No system found for component and Evaluation system in the Project"
    But I think I have solved it and seems pretty simple to change the system role from Evaluation System to any other that is relevant in your landscape.
    Go to transaction SOLAR01 > Click on the first level of the Project Name (Under Business Blueprint Structure) to select the Project.
    Click Business Blueprint in the Menu > System Role > Choose the relevant System Role (in my case Development)
    Click Copy
    This should replicate to all nodes and then you should be able to assign transaction to the business processes.
    Quite strange and seems simple, I checked the Solution Directory, Solar Project Admin etc etc but couldn't find the solution until this which should work.
    If not, there is a similar work around which also works.
    Go to transaction SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN
    System Landsacpe Tab
    Systems subtab
    Click System Role Assignment
    Remove the Evaluation System (or all those not relevant to your Project and Logical Components)
    Save Project
    Go to SOLAR01 and it should reflect it in the Blueprint.
    You can always go back to this and add the System Roles you removed and the Blueprint will reference the correct Role.
    Hope this helps everyone,
    -Rohan

  • Vendor Evaluation and Analysis

    Hello,
    Where can i find " vendor evaluation and analysis" information from SRM 5.0 datasources. I looked at it and i couldnot find it. Is it from SRM or do we get the data from ECC.
    Need your assistance.
    Thanks,
    Lasya.

    From ECC.

  • PROCESSING.EVALUATION AND CUMULATION CLASS

    Hi,
    Can anyone send me the link/document for processing ,cumulation and evaluation class.
    I want to complete usage .
    I tried searching in forum but in vein.
    Regards
    Ananthi.M
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=20061980&messageID=4685459
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=20061980&messageID=4605028
    processing class
    I got these From the forum search                                                                               
    Regards
    Ananthi.M
    Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 18, 2010 1:27 PM

    I got these From the forum search                                                                               
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=20061980&messageID=4685459
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=20061980&messageID=4605028
    processing class
    Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 18, 2010 1:30 PM

  • Help with Time Evaluation and function exit (HRPTIM03 / SAPLHRLV_001)

    Hello,
    Hopefully someone can help me with an issue I am having with time evaluation and a user exit I wrote.  The code for my exit is at the end of this post.  IN DEV and QAS, everything works.  However, in PRD, multiple rules are considered fulfilled (when looking in PT60), and so employees get two sets of vacation entitlements per month.
    We have three rules for quota type 03 (vacation).  Rules 3,6, and 9.  Only rule 9 should apply to the individuals with the two job numbers in the code.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Shane
    WHEN ABSENCE QUOTA TYPE IS 3 (VACATION)
    CASE XT559L-QTYPE.
    WHEN '3'.
    CASE - COMPARE SELECTION RULE FOR ABSENCE QUOTA TYPES
      CASE XT559L-ACCNR.
    WHEN RULE SELECTED IS 009
        WHEN '9'.
        IF JOB NUMBER IS 5084 OR 3084, THEN THE RULE APPLIES
          IF XP0001-STELL = '5084' OR XP0001-STELL = '3084'.
            XSUBRC = '0'.
        OTHERWISE, THE RULE DOES NOT APPLY
          ELSE.
            XSUBRC = '1'.
          ENDIF.
    WHEN ANY OTHER RULE IS SELECTED
        WHEN OTHERS.
        IF JOB NUMBER IS 5084 OR 3084, THEN THE RULE DOES NOT APPLY
          IF XP0001-STELL = '5084' OR XP0001-STELL = '3084'.
            XSUBRC = '1'.
        OTHERWISE, THE RULE APPLIES NORMALLY
          ELSE.
            XSUBRC = '0'.
          ENDIF.
      ENDCASE.
    WHEN OTHERS.
    ENDCASE.

    The problem was that even though the code was transported to PRD, and listed as Active - it still was not activated, and had to manually be done though CMOD.

  • Processing classes, cumulations, and evaluation classes for Surcharge

    Hi Experts,
    As I am working on Indian payroll in form 24Q the surcharge is not calculating properly it is displaying the TDS amount.
    and in surcharge column of form 16 is appearing total Taxable amount.
    Can any body send the nessessary sreen shots of process, cumulations and evaluation classes for the surcharge wage type.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Srinivas

    solved thanks

  • ACI Evaluation and DPS

    Some of our ACIs have historically used IP address/network to control access to certain data.
    On putting DS instances behind DPS, the DS ACIs respond to the DPS IP address rather than the client's.
    Is there a way to either (1) configure DPS to "pass-through" the client's IP address, or (2) have DPS perform ACI evaluation?
    Would the latter be an ACI Storage Repository?
    Thanks.
    Tom P.

    Hi Tom,
    Unlike the HTTP protocol, there is no standard way to pass the original client IP address to the directory server with LDAP.
    DPS can take advantage of client IP addresses in 2 different ways:
    First, you can classify incoming traffic into different "groups" using the "connection handler" feature based (amongs others) on the client IP address. Then policies (e.g target servers to use, or administrative limits to use) are applied based on group menbership.
    ( more on connection handlers and IP criteria at [http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-4809/fnkbx?l=en&a=view|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-4809/fnkbx?l=en&a=view]
    Second, you can configure ACIs on the DPS side, based on client IP addresses: DPS supports ACIs similar to the ds aci, but unlike ds acis, aci definitions are stored and evaluated on the proxy side. Some restrictions apply regarding proxy acis but IP-based acis are supported. ( more on DPS acis at [http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-4809/virtual-aci?l=en&a=view|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-4809/virtual-aci?l=en&a=view] . The doc is a bit misleading in the sense acis can be applied on any kind of data view, including plain old LDAP data views, not only "virtual" data views.
    Hope this helps
    -Sylvain

  • Processing classes, cumulation classes and evaluation classes

    Hi Friends,
             What is the diff between  processing classes, cumulation classes and evaluation classes. where we see these three and what is the table no. for this?

    .) Processing Class - A wage type characteristic that controls processing during Payroll. There are different processing classes for the various processing steps that are performed within Payroll. During the payroll run, SAP R/3 processes a wage type in a specific processing step according to its individual specification in the respective processing class.
    Cumulation class - Cumulation class are used to cumulate the model wage types to generate the /1** technical wage types.
    Example - Processing class 20 is used for cumulation and processed by PCR X023. Now suppose you have set specifiction as 8. Now if you will check PCR X023 for spec 8, it says to cumulate wage type into cumulation class which are ticked. Like may be you want to cumulate a model wage type into /101, set PCL 20 as 8 and tick cumulation class 1.
    Evaluation Class - Wage type characteristic that controls processing when payroll results are evaluated and displayed. There are various evaluation classes for the different processing steps that are performed when payroll results are evaluated and displayed.
    Example
    In the standard system, the specifications for evaluation class 02 determine how a wage type is printed on a form  that is payslip.
    Specification 00: no printing on the form
    Specification 01: prints personal payments/deductions
    Specification 02: prints wage types included in the total gross amount
    Specification 03: prints wage types derived from time-based payments and included in the total gross amount

  • Processing classes and evaluation classes

    hi there could some one tell me the best site to understand processing classes and evalution classes of Great Britian Payroll.(or anyother documentation)
    many thanks
    srikanth

    These are a few which are Uk specific.But I dont want to proof anything to you .So if you dont tell me why you require the meaning of a PR class I dont think I can help you.  Thanks anyways.                                                                               
    50 Deductions processing using 'Ba                                             
      61 Deduct GB court orders from net                                             
      62 Deduct from taxable pay -->CYCL                                             
      63 GB deductions from working net                                              
      64 GB SSP/SMP absence amounts  -->

  • What are the logical structure and physical structure in oracle

    what are the logical structure and physical structure in oracle and how can allocate a DB block size as default size is 8192?

    From the Concepts Guide
    http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/toc.htm
    The physical structures are:
    Datafiles
    Control Files
    Redo Log Files
    Archive Log Files
    Parameter Files
    Alert and Trace Log Files
    Backup Files
    The Logical Structures are:
    Tablespaces
    Oracle Data Blocks
    Extents
    Segments

  • What is diff b/w Include Structure and Append Structure at Database Level

    Hi Experts,
    Could you please let me know what is the main difference between .Include Structure and .Append Structure at SE11?
    Thanks in advance and for good answer will give good points.
    Sekhar

    Hi,
    1. Append Structures
    Append structures can only be assigned to a single table.
    Append structures are created in the custome rnamespace ( ZZ or YY)
    In case of new versions of the standard table during upgrade, the append structures are automatically appended to the new version of the standard table
    Append structures can not be used with cluster and pool tables
    Append structures are created in transaction SE11. Display the standard table fields and press the Append structure button.
    When you press the button, SAP sugests a name for the new append structure. After you has accepted the name,
    a screen will be shown where you can enter the new fields.
    Remember to activate.
    2. Customizing Includes
    Some of the SAP standard tables contains special include statements called Customizing includes. In contrast to Append structures,
    Note that customizing includes are created by SAP, but the customer supply the fields for the include.
    Customizing includes begin with CI_ and is part of the customer namespace
    One Customizing include can be inserted into more than one table.
    You can find Customizing includes in SE11 under structures.
    Try to take a look at table RKPF which uses the Customizing include CI_COBL (In an IDES system). Next try to add a field to CI_COBL, and activate it. If you go back to table RKPF you will se that your new field has been added.
    Regards,
    Ferry Lianto

  • Questions on Iframes and PAR structures

    Hi,
    I have a few questions on Iframes, JSP's and PAR structure for Portal Application Projects in NWDS.
    1. Can I change the source of an iframe from one jsp to another instead of one html to another.
    2. My Jsp's are in Portal-Inf/pagelet because whenever I add a new JSP I add a new Portal application object. So how do you refer to the relative path in the calling JSP. e.g <iframe name = "myframe" src ="<relative path>BlankPage.jsp" width="100%">. What would be the relative path. I tried pagelet\jspname.jsp but it does not work.
    3. In general how do you type the relative path for objects in a PAR project structure?

    Hi Prem,
    1.Yes,you can.
    2.You dont have to,you can copy and paste as many as Jsp's inside the pagelet.I use beans to customize the BHTML UI properties.So you can make your IFRAME source tag as variable.
    <iframe
         id="Nedbrowser"
         name="Nedbrowser"
         style="relative"
         width="<%=myBean.getFrameWidth()%>"
         height="<%=myBean.getFrameHeight()%>"
         frameborder="yes"
         marginheight="0"
         marginwidth="0"
         scrolling="yes" 
         src="<%=myBean.getUrl()%>">
    </iframe>
    Your approach of setting relative path wont work as it is.You have to do something more
    1. in JSP you have to use a import statement like
    <%@ page import="com.sapportals.portal.prt.resource.IResource" %>
    <% IResource rs = componentRequest.getResource(IResource.JSP , "pagelet/BalnkPage.jsp");  %>
    and in the IFRAME tag you can do something like this
    <iframe
         id="Nedbrowser"
         name="Nedbrowser"
         style="relative"
         width="300"
         height="400"
         frameborder="yes"
         marginheight="0"
         marginwidth="0"
         scrolling="yes" 
         src="">
    </iframe>
    <% Nedbrowser.setSrc(rs.getResourceInformation().getURL(componentRequest)); %>
    3.There are so many forum pages on this matter.Just go ahead and search for IResource in SDN.
    Goodluck
    regards
    Senthivel

  • The source and target structure have a different number of fields

    Hi,
    I am new to workflow and I am trying to create an attachment in Workflow (SAP ECC 6.0) and pass it through to a User Decision (User Decision works fine) however the workflow is failing on the attachment step with u2018The source and target structure have a different number of fieldsu2019. The bindings check ok. Please see details below.
    I have used document u2018Creating Attachments to Work Items or to User Decisions in Workflowsu2019 by Ramakanth Reddy for guidance. Thanks in advance.
    1) Workflow containers (SWDD)
    WORKITEMID (import)
    ZSWR_ATT_ID (export)
    SOFM (export)
    2) Task Container (PFTC)
    1 Import parameter defined u2013 WORKITEMID (swr_struct-workitemid)
    2 Export parameters defined
    - SOFM (Ref. obj. type SOFM)
    - ZSWR_ATT_ID  (swr_att_id-doc_id)
    Binding task -> Method
    Binding for 1 parameter (import) defined
    Task <- Method
    Binding for 2 parameters (export) defined
    3) Z  BOR object created with a Method, Method Parameters and Event (SWO1)
    1 import parameter defined
    2 export parameters defined
    Method calls FM SSF_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME, CONVERT_OTF, SCMS_XSTRING_TO_BINARY and SAP_WAPI_ATTACHMENT_ADD
    Workflow is triggered by FM SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT, Return_code = 0
    Event_id = 00000000000000000001
    Test results
    A) Triggered by ABAP/ FM SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT - SWI2_DIAG results
    Work item  14791: object <z bor object name> method <method name> cannot be executed. The source and target structure have a different number of fields (this message is repeated 3 times). Error handling for work item 14791. No errors occurred -> details in long text (message is repeated 3 times).
    Message no. WL821, OL383, WL050 in long text
    B) Z BOR Test method <execute>
    Enter workitem id.
    Runtime error - Data objects in Unicode programs cannot be converted. The statement "MOVE src TO dst" requires that the operands "dst" and "src" are convertible. Since this statement is in a Unicode program, the special conversion rules for Unicode programs apply.                                        
    In this case, these rules were violated.   
    Program                             SAPLSWCD                
    Include                                LSWCDF00                
    Row                                    475                     
    Module type                        (FORM)                  
    Module Name                      MOVE_CONTAINER_TO_VALUE           
    C) Z BOR Test method <debugging>
    Enter workitem id.
    SAP_WAPI_ATTACHMENT_ADD, return_code = 0, message_lines  = Attachment created            
    both  swc_set_element container work ok
    Runtime error occurs after end_method executed. Data objects in Unicode programs cannot be converted.
    D) Workflow test
    Enter workitem id <execute>
    Task started> Workflow log> Status = Error
    Workflow errors in Attachment step (however Office document can be viewed in details for step).

    Problem has now been resolved. Problem was related to use of swr_att_id structure and swc_set_element statement in BOR program - problem resolved by only setting w/f container to swr_att_id-doc_id.

  • Download and upload structure

    hi,
    how to download and upload structure from one r/3 to another r/3 system . 
    <b><REMOVED BY MODERATOR></b>
    regards,
    anuj
    Message was edited by:
            Alvaro Tejada Galindo

    Check my weblog...It might help you out -;)
    <a href="/people/alvaro.tejadagalindo/blog/2006/03/14/taking-good-care-of-z-tables good care of Z tables</a>
    Greetings,
    Blag.

  • Directory Scan and Volume Structure Failure

    My imac (white, 24") has been running slow and freezing up while attempting to preview files. Ran Disc Utility and OnyX, which gave me the following permission issues:
    Permissions differ on "usr/share/derby", should be drwxr-xr-x , they are lrwxr-xr-x
    Repaired "usr/share/derby"
    Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/
    But otherwise, both said the disk was fine.
    Ran TechTools failed the Directory Scan, Format Scan, and Volume Scan. I restarted from a second partition on the same HD. This partition passed all tests.
    I repeated all three tests on the original partition. This time, Disk Utility could not verify or repair the original partition and no longer recognized it as a valid startup disk. I erased the partition and restored from a Time Machine backup. Now, I get the following permission errors:
    Permissions differ on "usr/share/derby", should be drwxr-xr-x , they are lrwxr-xr-x
    Repaired "usr/share/derby"
    ACL found but not expected on "Library/Preferences/Audio"
    Repaired "Library/Preferences/Audio"
    ACL found but not expected on "Library/Preferences/com.apple.alf.plist"
    Repaired "Library/Preferences/com.apple.alf.plist"
    Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/
    And while once again OnyX and Disk Utility says the disk is fine, Tech Tools still reports a Directory Scan failure and Volume Structure failure. A subsequent Surface Scan passed.
    Ideas? Is this a software failure or a hardware failure? Both partitions are running 10.6.3. This is the second HD on this imac, the previous 750GB failed completely and could not be restored.

    Kyle W wrote:
    It says permissions are repaired on those items, but when I verify permissions, they are still not right.
    See Mac OS X: Disk Utility's Repair Disk Permissions messages that you can safely ignore. It isn't that the permissions themselves are wrong but that the database of correct permissions on your hard drive the utility refers to has not been updated to reflect the permissions settings & directory structure changes in the most recent OS updates. This is a known issue that affects everyone, but as the article says, you can ignore it.
    Mac is not experiencing the same slow down on routine items as it was before, but TechTools is still saying there's a problem.
    What version of TechTools are you using? If it is not a current one it may not recognize the recent changes in the file system structure made in Snow Leopard.

Maybe you are looking for