Every delivery nos having same sales order should create single invoice.

Hello All,
My Business requirement is :
For particular Order type if the deliveries belong to the same sales orders, then Routine allow creating Single invoice else it should spilt the invoice according the deliveries belonging to different sales orders.
Before this routine is called i have to check conditions like 'delivery type' and sales area.
So, I have copied routine FV60C001 , added conditions as per requirement. But how to code this requirement is my issue.
Could anyone please suggest how to achieve this.
Regards,
Meena

Hi,
Check SAP Note 11162 - Invoice split criteria in billing document to seach other possible causes.
Regards
Eduardo

Similar Messages

  • Merge PR (same sales order) and Create PO using BADI

    Hi,
    How to merge PR (of same sales order) and create PO using Tcode ME59n.
    Is this possible using BADI?
    pls reply.
    A Rahim.

    Hello Deepak
    This kind of issue is probably related to your rescheduling settings. The PO is probably excluded from the rescheduling settings on customizing or it is outside the rescheduling horizon.
    Please take a look on the following WIKI that explains the rescheduling and the related settings in detail:
    What is rescheduling and how does it work - ERP Manufacturing (PP) - SCN Wiki
    BR
    Caetano

  • Complete sales order after creating proforma invoice

    Hi gurus,
    I am having the following issue:
    I need to generate a proforma invoice. So, I create a new sales order, and then create the invoice based on that same order. The problem is that this sales order keeps its status open, as I understand, because it is pending a delivery. However, I do not wish to create any delivery, only the proforma invoice.
    I have created a new billing document type (based on standard F5), as well as a new sales order type and item category.
    Can anyone give some pointers on what i need to configure in order to not need to create a delivery?
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Joã

    Your doc config seems to be okay for pro forma invoice..
    Kindly check ur header copying control for Sales Doc to Billing Doc (proforma Invoice).
    In general for this senario it is
    0007-Header/ord.pro forma (E.g. Order related pro-forma invoices can be created to supply customs declarations for non-deliverable items such as services. If a customer has ordered a service, this requirement can be assigned to the header to permit the creation of the proforma invoice.)
    And have look on Billing quantity indicator for copy control item. This specifies which quantity the system copies from the source document (a sales order, for example) into the target billing document (an invoice, for example). When you create an invoice for a standard sales order item, for example, the quantity that the system copies into the invoice is the delivery quantity less the quantity already invoiced. If you create a pro forma invoice, the system copies in the order quantity.
    C and D for pro forma invoices
    Make sure that control of the amount to be billed is directly related to the item category billing relevance.
    As we know,  "relevant for Billing", indicates what the basis for billing should be.
    "D:" Relevant for proforma - The billing relevance indicator must contain a value (not be blank) in order to be able to create pro forma invoices. Indicator "D" can also be used as follows for cross-company-code business processing. In the case of a free-of-charge outbound delivery, the company code that is responsible for the delivery should be granted an internal settlement. You can use indicator "D" to record free-of-charge outbound deliveries and grant internal settlements to the relevant company code.
    One thing I like to point out, the sales order will be in open status, even though it has a pro forma invoice.
    Till you have not create a confirmed invoice (in case of non deliverable item) or delivery for that sales order.
    As you might be aware of, proforma invoice is abridged or estimated invoice sent by a seller to a buyer in advance of a shipment or delivery of goods. It notes the kind and quantity of goods, their value, and other important information such as weight and transportation charges.
    Still, I have one doubt, is your sales order an indicative doc and is not going to have any relevant accounting entry?
    If No, then just give a rethought on your business process & confirm with user?
    Thanks & Regards
    J Prakash.
    Edited by: J Prakash on May 13, 2010 3:44 PM

  • How to update the condition price in sales order while creating the invoice

    Hi,
    How to update the condition price in the sales order to carry out the new price while creating the invoice?
    While creating the invoice it should update the condition price in sales order.
    Thanks,
    Balaram

    No, pricing is not there in delivery.
    I found an exit for VF01transaction where we can update the price in order.
    Can you please tell me how to update the price if I have the order, material numbers and conditions number?
    Thanks,
    Balaram

  • Sale order 'value changes' after invoice creation

    Experts,
    A sale order was created / shipped / invoiced. The invoice did not go to accounting because of credit auth error. We have a procedure to fix it and then release it to accounting (transaction VFX3). All OK until this point.
    While fixing the auth error, an user changed the freight condition value in the sale order. Then invoice is released to accounting. Now, the value of freight in order and invoice match. How is it possible to change the value of an invoice after its creation?
    Any input would be appreciated.
    UV

    when the value is changed in the sale order, it would automatically transfer
       the new pricing to the existing open SD invoice pending accounting entry??
    Certainly not.  The control is in VTFL where if you select the billing item category for the combination of your delivery type and billing type, you can see a field "Pricing Type".  If you maintain any value other than "B", system will copy the price from sale order to billing and you can, as I said above, can change manually in billing.  On the other hand, if you have maintained "B" in the above field, system will not  consider sale order price but will check your pricing condition maintained in VK11 which you can check in VK12 or VK13.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Routine for copying sales order header text to invoice

    Hi friends,
    My requirement is to copy header texts from sales orders when creating an invoice (VF01). In T-Code VOTX the system suggests two routines :
    1 - DATEN_KOPIEREN_01 include LV45TE01
    2 - DATEN_KOPIEREN_02 include LV45TE02
    Does anyone already use one of these routines? When invoicing more than one sales order does the routines work fot this case ?
    Best Regards.

    Hello.
    .....goto transaction VOFM
    Menue: Copying requirements -> Billing documents
    ...or maybe: Data transfer -> Billing documents
    Put a break-point and the header routine......for long-text you should use transaction VOTXN
    Edited by: Erik Hoven on Feb 24, 2009 12:28 PM

  • Order and delivery related billing from same Sales Order

    Hi
    I have a scenario where in the same sales order customer has put two line items.One with item category TAN i.e. Delivery related billing and other TAD i.e. Order related billing. Line item with TAN item category is invoiced. When trying to create invoice for second line item(TAD) system gives error like" Item Category OR TAN can not be invoiced with billing type F2".that means when I create billing for second line item ,it also drags first line item which is already billed.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks

    Hello,
    the system works in this way:
    - for every item present in the sales document to be billed, it searches an entry customizing copy control table TVCPF.
    - if TVCPF entry does not exist (because TAN is not maintained in transaction VTFA OR -> F2) then system issues message VF003
    - If TVCPF entry exists, then system performs the copy-requirement routine to check if the item is billeable.
    SOLUTION:
    You could maintain an entry in VTFA for combination OR -> F2 item TAN, and put a copy-requirement routine setting SY-SUBRC = 4, so that the billing is item is not created for the sales order TAN item.
    Best regards,
    Ivano.

  • Sales order should not be abled to be changed

    Sales order should not be abled to be changed after creating and confirming to the customer. What needs to be done?

    Hi kishore
    1) after creating the sales order   we are gong to send  confirmation through output determinatin output type (BA00) .
    2) once the customer confirms the  order based on thet we do the delivery. right----
    3) see exmple : a person who creates the order he does'nt have rights to change in big industry lot of departments (so many managers) has to see the order because  the order canbe  one item it can be 1000 items.
    4) every body will be having certain limitations like authorisations if you take my company i don't have authorisations to do FI settings or MM settings.
    5) what means to say is if  that order has to be changed ababrs might have written the code the moment the order confirms from the customers it's goes to respective department or managers through work flow if it goes any manager , a person who created the order he can't do any changes on that. that's why business works. that is  what SAP
    i hope you have under stood
    thanks
    surya

  • Partial delivery per item in sales order and ATP - schedule lines

    Hi,
    I've problem regarding ATP- schedule lines and partial delivery flag.
    In sales order there is flag Partial delivery per item B / 1 . That means create only one delivery even with quant 0. That comes from customer master or customer info-record and it is OK.
    Please look at next example.
    Customer requires:
    10 PCS of materail A on date X. Only 5 PCS are available on date X.
    10 PCS of material B on date X 0 PCS are available on date X, 10 PCS are available on date Y.
    So if we create outbound delivery on date X it will contain only 5 PCS of material  A. No successive deliveries will be created for material A because of the flag B/1. That item is closed.
    Problem is with material B.
    The sales order will be open because of material B and on date Y we can easily create another delivery with 10 PCS of mat B.
    That is wrong. Agreement with customer is only one delivery for ALL items in sales order. If we create delivery on date X it should contain only materials which are available on date X and sales order should close.
    Do you know how to fix this problem?

    Hi,
    I've think you didn't understand my requirement. I allways get schedule lines but they are confirmed on different dates.
    Example in same sales order we have:
    Schedule line for item A:
    DATE X confirmed quantity 10
    Schedule line for an item B.
    DATE X confirmed quanitity 0 (zeroe)
    DATE Y confirmed quantity 10.
    I would like to create outbond delivery on date X with:
    item A quantity 10
    item B quantity 0.
    And if that hapens than B/0 rule will work or reference customzing that you suggested before. So order will be closed because all items are processed or referenced once.
    Do you know how to do that?
    Regards

  • Delivery Split from multiple sales order with signle ship to party

    Dear All,
    I have multiple sales oreder with different Sold to party and single Ship to Party.
    I want to combine all sales order into a single delivery but here deliver split due to different sold to party which I have checked through report ZLE_ANALYZE_DELIVERY_SPLIT.
    Can any body suggest me, whether i can write any copy control routine so that it will stop in splitting delivery.
    Please suggest if any other way of possibility.
    Regards
    Prashant

    All partners which stand in the partner schema of the delivery and which are copied from the preceding document are part of split criteria. The only mandatory partner of the outbound delivery however is the ship-to party.
    You can delete the sold-to party from the partner schema for deliveries with order reference and it is then no included in splitting criteria.
    Furthermore you can control split criteria in copy control routines -> field ZUKRL is used for this purpose. You can check standard routine FV50C001 for that.
    Your Z* code means that you have applied custom logic to define split criteria. But most probably it is called by copy control routines and the mechanism should be the same.
    For more details you can also check OSS notes:
    SAP Note 546668 - FAQ: Delivery split when creating deliveries
    SAP Note 166397 - Delivery split according to customer field ZUKRL
    Regards,
    Dominik Modrzejewski

  • ATP Check at Delivery Level instead of Sales Order

    In Standard SAP, whenever a sales order is created the ATP check is done and a Goods movement 601 is done for it and gets blocked.
    I want that no movement to be carried out at Sales Order Level and should get blocked only at the Delivery level, instead of Sales order.
    Can i do this by not defining any movement type in the schedule line category attached to the Item category of the sales order.

    hi amit,
      u cannot remove MT assignment to SLCAT ,but what you can do is for your checking group and checking rule remove the ATP check relevancy in requirement class defination in spro customising >sd>availibility and TOR.
      so that in VOV4 transaction for your SLCAT atp will be deactivated.
    only while posting material doc at the time of PGI system would check for availibility and block the goods movement.
    reward if helps !!!!!

  • Sceduling as per the delivery confirmation date in sales order

    Hi,
    I am working with planning strategy 50 and using availabilty check as per ATP.
    When I create the sales order and check the availabilty, system confirms the delivery after TRLT(current date+TRLT).But when I run MRP,system creates a planned order on the req delivery date date.
    (Req date - GR Processing Time - In-House Production time) so that Planned Order is available on the req delivery date.
    As the system confirms the delivery after TRLT,I want my planned order's availabilty on the same date.
    to summarise,I don't want system to consider the Reqmt date as reqd delivery date of the sales order but the conformed delivery date of the sales order.
    I appreciate your help in letting me know if there is any way we can do this.
    Regards,
    Sastry
    Edited by: Sastry Krishna on Dec 13, 2008 4:45 PM

    Hi,
    Can you check what is the Variant (dates filed) specified by going to SM37 transaction.do as below,
    Goto SM37 transaction and give job name and then execute then select check box against date you scheduled job and then CtrlShiftF9,now place cursor on program/command and from the menu Goto-->Variant,here you check if any date range there.
    Regards,
    Chandra

  • Creation of Sales Delivery with reference to Sales Order

    Hi SAP Team,
    I tried making a Delivery with reference to Sales Order. Though in Item Category detemination of Delivery configuration, a separate
    Item Category has been configured, but still System picks up the one in Sales Order. Is there a way to get different Item Category at Delivery level.
    Also, for Subitems a different Item Category is proposed, but still it follows the same behaviour, which is at header level.
    Is there any way to change it.
    regards

    Hi,
    Maintain the required values in the T.Code "0184".
    Or follow the path:
    SPRO>Logistics Execution>Shipping>Deliveries>Define Item Category Determination in Deliveries.
    You have maintained the similar values for your delivery type same as sales order type that were maintained in "VOV4" T.Code.
    So that it getting the item category same as the sales order.
    Change the values here,so that new item categories will be appeared in delivery.
    Regards,
    Krishna.

  • Sales order should get block if XYZ payment terms is used

    Dear Expert,
    The requirement is like,
    If user add payment term XYZ  manually in salse order then that sales order should get block for review purpose.
    Note:
    if user add that payment term in sales order client want that order should block no matter what reason ,  here client not concern about credit limit and any outstanding from customer side ,
    Thanks in advance
    hanumant

    Hi,
    You need to block orders with payment terms XYZ, or only when user changes from ABC to XYZ??
    If first one is your requirment, you can do with userexit - USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT, and you need to create status profile for sales document type and assign to order type, in status profile put status AUTO - automatically approved, LOCK - when XYZ is payments terms it wil not and not create delivery & REJC- Rejected, when approver dont want to approve he can reject.
    In sales order userexit you need write logic when paytemnt terms is XYZ then put status as LOCK.
    New repor need to create to approve LOCKed orders so that user execute and approves or rejects.
    If only user change to XYZ, then you need to write logic in prepare userexit, but it will be tricy, need to store values in tempapory memory, ceck with abaper,

  • VL10C double delivery notes for one sales order

    Dear all,
    Currently we encountered an very strange issue in our SAP.  we found that via VL10C, SAP create two duplicated ourbound delivery notes for one sales order, which resulted in a double items and amount in the billing document. These two deliveries notes are complete the same, which were created with 7 sec interval via VL10C. Check in the sales order, we can see delivery Qty was double against order Qty for all the items.
    does anyone have a clue on this issue? your effort and feedback will be most applicated!
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Kyo NG

    Hi,
    I forgot this possible cause. Check Note 61148 - VL04 VL02 AME807 AME815: Insert to table VETVG and related notes, specially Note 931297 - VL10x, VL10HU - Duplicate entries displayed in STO.
    Regards,
    Eduardo

Maybe you are looking for

  • Missing PDF link that is no longer in the document?

    Hello - I have this document that previously had a multi-page PDF linked file. After several iterations the PDF images were removed from the document. Recently our IT had decided to rename our servers so all the links in the document had to be relink

  • Adobe Reader 9.3.2 local print error

    Hi, I have a lot of problems with Adobe Reader 9.3.2 and printig to local printers. I can print to my network printer just fine. When I try to print from pdf to my local printer I get this error (can't upload .jpg file:( Bellow is the error: "The ins

  • PROCESS ORDER SETTLEMENT - KO88

    Hi! As per my knowledge KO88 will be done for OHDS and for Material.  OHDS settlement will be done in month ending which results the difference between KSII and KP26. Can anybody explain how the accounting entry will be generated at the time of Proce

  • I want to connect my zen v plus!

    I have one , but then i want connect?it, computer see zen v plus but ZEN V Series Media Explorer say that mp3 plaeyr isn't conected . What i have to do?

  • Upgrade from Forms AS10g (9.0.4) to (10.1.2.0.2)

    Hai, Can anybody please give me link for upgrading from Forms AS10g (9.0.4) to (10.1.2.0.2)