Excise UOM Issue

Hi All
I am facing the UOM issue while creating excise invoice. Actually my client is creating Commercial invoice in Sqm & excise Invoice in KG i.e. different UOM for comm & excise invoice. Now when i create excise invoice through J1IIN, I cannot change the UOM from sqm to kg.
Please suggest how can i make different UOM in excise & comm invoive.
I have maintained both these UOMs along with the conversion factor in material master.
Thanks
Rishi

Hi Rishi,
Can you pls explain the exact process of creating excise invoice with different UoM as im also facing the same problem.
Which document u have taken as reference? I tried taking billing document but its not accepting the values. Pls reply.
Rgds,
Antima

Similar Messages

Depot Excise Invoice Issue

Dear Friends,
Business Process: The depot receives the material in bags, after that they torn the bags and sell it in loose (some times they sell it in bags also). So to differentiate the loose material they are maintaining the material in a storage location called LOOS (apart from storage loc. BAGS).
1. After MIGO and while capturing the excise (J1IG) the storage location is BAGS.
2. After receiving the material they are transferring it to storage location -LOOS with MB1B (movement type-311).
3. After PGI, while doing depot excise invoice (J1IJ), system is not able to select the reference document, since the storage location is different.
Pl guide me how to rectify the problem.
Also tell me, is there any other procedure that we can adopt to resolve the issue.
Regards,
Sreehari

Hi
Check in J_1IWRKCUS table wheather the plant, excise regn and Depot are there coming or not. Also check in Excise group details wheather you have checked the box of Depot settings.
Regards
Srinath

Export Excise Invoice issue

Hi,
I have one scenario where in export invoice excise duties are not getting capture...
Example:
Customer is using ECC 5.0 with TAXINJ procedure where plant 100 and 200 maintained ,different material code are maintain for two plant x for 100 and y for 200.one excise group D1 for both plant ,series group S1 for 100 and S2 for 200,one shipping point P1 for both plant.
Now I have created one export sales order with both materials, x from plant 100 and y from 200, here everything is fine till billing
Export Sales order
item material qty plant
10 - x - 10 - 100
20 - y - 10 - 200
System is capturing everything properly till billing document means BED,ECS and HECS but when I will create excise invoice in J1IIN with the reference of billing document then system is not capturing BED and HECS ,only ECS is captured.
Why this is happening? Any solution,please suggest........I have checked all CIN setting I believe everything is fine...
Regards,
Vipin

Hi ,
As u suggested above for user exit ,we have already applied this user exit but issue is still not resolved..
Problem is in J1IIN BED,CESS n HCESS are getting properly for Plant 100 material but BED and HCESS are nullified for pant 200 material.
Below example clear the picture, please have a look
Transaction Code: J1IIN
item Material BED CESS HCESS Plant
1 A 10 2 1 100
2 B 10 2 1 100
3 C 00 2 0 200
4 D 10 2 1 100
5 E 00 2 0 200
6 F 00 2 0 200
Note: Shipping point is same in both plant.
Please suggest..
Edited by: KHAPREVIPIN on Dec 12, 2011 1:41 AM

Excise invoice issue with AT1

While i creation of Excise invoice with this t.code J1IIN with
refference to Billing document this is autometically generated the
Excise invoice and while i save this document the system thowing the
following eror.
AT1 : Debit = 77,01 Credit = 231,03 Diff =
154,02-
Message no. 8I312
Please give the solutoin for this issue,thanks in advance.
with regards,
Venkat

Hi Bernhard,
Thanks for your previous mail but am not able to solve the problem. I have done some changes in configuration now am getting the following erro.
Error in allocating Excise invoice number Number object J_1IEXCLOC
Message no. 8I336
Please give the more details to solve this issue.
With regards,
Venkat
Edited by: vsajjala on Nov 22, 2010 12:05 PM

Excise related issue

hi,
I've faced some issues regarding Excise part1 and part2 (capture and post)
1. can we cancel the the exice part 1 without cancelling the mat doc(assuming part 2 entry is not getting updated yet)? if yes the how?
2. can we cancel the the exice part 1 only without cancelling the mat doc(assuming part 2 entry is getting updated allready)? if yes the how?
3. can we cancel the the exice part 1 and part 2 both without cancelling the mat doc? if yes the how?
Please help me and give solution in details
regards,
Aniruddha

Hi
Following is the procedure.
Assume you have posted a goods receipt and then posted the CENVAT on the excise invoice accordingly. Then it transpires there is a problem with the goods and the goods receipt has to be reversed. Under excise laws, that means you are no longer entitled to the CENVAT credit.
In the SAP System, therefore, you have to reverse CENVAT posting correspondingly.
1. MIGO:Cancel the material document (movement type 102) & during cancellation update part1 only. This changes the excise invoice document status to In process
2. J1IEX:Post the excise invoice referring the material document (of movement type 102). Creates an accounting document to reverse the CENVAT postings. Creates a corresponding entry in Part II of the appropriate excise register
Thus the excise postings are reversed.
3.J1IEX: Cancel the excise invoice (Do this if your plant does not allow multiple goods receipts per excise invoice).Now the system will allow you to cancel the vendor excise invoice

Excise Duty issue

Dear Sir,
I configure Excisable depot.
STO Process
we created purchase order in which price is mentioned 1000 for a material, and we did delivery ,proforma invoice and excise invoice ( Price of material 1000, Excise Duty is BED 100 Ecs 2 H Ecss 1) through J1IIN and we have done Goods receipt through MIGO while doing MIGO we have given Base Value 1000 ,BED 100, ECS 2, H Ecs 1 and J1IG document also created.
the issue is that while selling goods, our sales price will be 2000 so naturally BED will be 200, ECS 4 and Hecss 2 in our sales invoice. but when we create Depot Excise Invoice through J1IJ . excise duties BED 100, Ecs 2 and Hecss 1 are appearing which means the amount of excise duties are picking up from J1IG document OR MIGO Document.
question is that we need to do Price escalation in depot , how can we treat excise duties in Depot?
Do we need to do JV in Depot for excise?
Please give me an insight in this regard as early as possible
Thanks
Shibu Chandran

As per excise law in India, whenever there is a price escalation happens in a depot we have to create a document called "A Certificate" by paying additional excise duty on the differencial amount between STO price and Depot sales price. Because when you post incoming excise duty in J1IG after MIGO at depot, system captures BED, CESS & E.CESS as per the chapter ID of the material being transported from the factory and based on this Excise duty value for STO is calculated.
If the selling price of the material is higher than the STO price, we have to pay excise duty on the defference. Because law requires excise duty to be calculated on the selling price or assesible value if one exists.
perform the following activities
J1ILN >Indirect taxes>Procurement->Excise invoice->For Depot--> J1IGA Acertificate entry at Depot
Here enter the internal excise invice already captured at J1IG. System will show you the excise duty values to corresponding Folio nos. Here you can enter excess amount to be paid for each line item in the excise invoice. Save.
Now you create OR, delivery and PGI from Depot for customer. Go to J1IJ to create Depot Excise invoice. After entering the delivery document no. you will see a list internal of excise invoices choose the excise invoice to which your delivery material belongs. In the bottom you will see other table containing a list of "A Certifivates" created for all your internal excise invoices. You have to choose the "A Cerificate" of the internal invoice which you have selected already. Capture and post the document. Now RG23D will be updated.
Now you create the commercial invoice for the customer in VF01. In item condition tab you can see the effect of "A Certificate".
Please reward if you find this as useful
Regards
Ramesh

Excise Indicator issue

Dear Gurus,
In our company we are following TAXINN and our Plant and regular Customers are applicable for Excise.
If Customer is Excise relevant, in J1ID, under 'Customer Excise Details' we assign 'Customer Excise Indicator' as '1' and if not relevant for Excise, we assign the indicator '3'. Same is the case for the Plant.
For regular Customer and regular Plant the combination under 'Excise Indicator for Plant and Customer' is 1 : 1 = 1.
For SEZ customers and regular Plant, the combination is 3 : 1 = 3 (combination is not relevant for Excise).
Now my issue is after maintaining like this and maintaining normal Excise condition record for BED as 8%, how to make the system take zero Excise duty for SEZ customer only?
Though Excise Indicator '3' is given, where are we saying to the system that if Excise Indicator is '3', then pick zero value for calculation purpose in Pricing Procedure of Sales Order?
What is the configuration I am missing? Help me with this, as it is an immediate issue for me.
Best regards and thanks in advance.

DearAA,
If I am not totally wrong, Customer Tax classification is for Sales Tax (which is maintained in CMR under Billing Tab in Sales Area Data screen) and nothing to do with Excise duties. I need to change the Excise duties differently for different customers of the same group, distribution channel and division.
Dear Prashanth,
I am not doing Exports or Deemed exports, ya, I realise I gave wrong information regarding SEZ. I meant to say that if the customer is like SEZ customer who is not liable for Excise duties, how to prevent the system from populating excise values in the pricing procedure. My customers are not SEZ customers, but regular Dealers, who have Excise exemption due to some special circumstances.
Any help plzzzz . . .

Inclusive of excise duty issue

Hi,
We encountered a issue in case of inclusive of excise duty procurement. I will try to explain it here.
We have punched a PO with excise duty inclusive and the tax code as per the vendor's terms.
The GR based IV is checked.
We made GRN with reference to this PO. In this GRN we put the excise values in appropriate places. Here we have not checked the MRP indicator in excise invoice header.
In the invoice verification when we give the inputs system is fetching the values as per the PO and not as per the GRN.
This scenario is done with text material. The scenario works fine with material code.
Now my question is when system fetches values from PO while LIV and not from GRN? One more thing i have tried this scenario with MRP indicator checked but same results are found.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar

Here we have not checked the MRP indicator in excise invoice header.
Now my question is when system fetches values from PO while LIV and not from GRN?
If MRP indicator is not ticked,how system will split excise from base value frm p.o in GR excise &
also need to orginal base value without excise while invoicing.
My suggestion for dealer purchase is you need to create seperate tax code to handle it.
I don't have any idea about how MRP indicator works for text material ?
Refer Note 1104456 - Use of MRP indicator for capturing excise duties from dealer
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 9, 2010 10:28 PM

Excise(serious issue)

hi friends..
        when excise was changed from 10% to 8%, i changed the conditions records for all tax code with JMOP conditions type from 10% to 8% directly in t-code FV12 and saved.
      My issue is before changing BED was calculating properly as 10%, after changing it is calculating 8.24%(BEDECESSSCESS) instead of 8%(BED),
     please anybody tell me was it the wrong procedure i followed while changing tax percentage,
if so please let me know the right procedure...
    else please let me know to solve this issue, please guide me what all i have to do..
    awaiting ur valuable replies...
thanks in advance..

No for excise rates but yes for exceptional excise rates...
Please check if somedoy had mantained exceptional excise rates in J1ID.
Also check your condition records in FV12, check the valid date or if any other condition records for the same condition type JMOP (BED), key can be your tax code, also check the setoff condition records..
Regards,
Sujoy

Excise Group and Excise Register issue

Hi Friends,
We have internal order budgeting for consumables.whenever we make purchase order , the account assignment category is F and we purcahse against the particular internal order.when G/R is done the consumable material gets cosnumed against the particular interla order. ie goods receipt and the issue against the internal order with same movement type.
IF the material is exciseable then excise part 1 register shows receipt and removed quantity .please suggest how to avoid the removal entry in part 1 register. only receipt has to be updated in the part 1 not the removal ie goods issue.
and
at the same time we have std. purchasing also. we maintian one excise group for plant
and excise group i maintain consumption check box.
at the time of register system shows only one type of procurment data . how to handle this senario.
go for other excise group need to be maintained or else one excise group is sufficeent
pls explain step by step.

Hi Akhil,
Thanks for ur reply
i am not understood "3" their is no option in selection "3" at excise group part1 posting trigger(consumption) only.
here business line are different
senario 1: i am purchasing material for internal order (while i made GR , auto GI).
theirs is sales order or MRP direct create PO manual. (here excise group removed for consumption).
senario 2: i am purchasing material for stock (std.) (while i made GR stock goes to MMBE, after i goods issue to certain reservation based).
for std process i maintain excise group (consumption check box maintained).
in RG23a or RG23C both part1 and part2 will need to be updated.
so how can i map single excise group for two senarios.

UOM issue

hi,
Here I am explaining the issue
In system A -
material A001
Base unit of measure = EA
In system A u2013
material A001
Base unit of measure = PC
UOM is maintained differently between SYSTEM A and B.
In B we have maintained additional unit of measure LIKE 1EA = 1PC
Initially we were trying to correct the UOM as EA instead of PC so to match with A system, but that is not possible to change.
In system A they have not maintained additional UOM like as above PC=EA. And it is not possible to maintain they have told due to PC is not available as UOM in the A system.
SYSTEM A side they confirmed that SO got generated in A system without any issue.
After SO generated in A, buyer supposes to find an order acknowledgement in PO in SYSTEM B, but that is missing. So there is I-DOC fail.
so i check the error of IDOC, i found error message 'Order units differ'. Standard code to check VALUE OF UOM OF idoc(seg E1EDP01-MENEE). It used function module 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDRSP' -> subroutines 'maintain_data_ordrsp' like 'IF yekpo-meins NE fekpo-meins.' .
Can anybody adivise me how to fix this error?
thank you !!!!!

Hi SS,
You can not change the UOM once the P.O.are closed. u can use alternative conversions method.
Manoj

Alternative UoM issue

Hi Gurus
material A - Base UoM = LB
component B - Base UoM = LB, Alt UoM = PC (conversion 1PC = 10 LB)
I am trying to create a BOM (CS01) for material A: with components B.
And I'm receiving this error:
Unit of measure PC not supported for material B in plant 000X
Message no. 29175
Diagnosis
You have entered a unit of measure for a component or variable-size item which is not defined.
System Response
The unit of measure entered is checked against settings in the IMG (Global settings -> Unit of measurement). This table contains all the units of measure that are supported in the system.
If the item is a material, the system also checks whether the entered unit of measure corresponds to the unit of issue or base unit of measure in the material master.
For variable-size items, the item entry screen and the overview also allow the you to enter the unit "piece" (Var-size item unit).
Procedure
Check your entries.
Delete your entry for the unit of measure.
If you have entered a material as an item, the system enters the unit of issue from the material master, if there is one. If not, the base unit of measure from the material master appears.
If no material is entered in the item, the system takes the unit "piece" as a default.
Can someone please help me in resolving this issue? Thanks

dear friend,
you could run MM02 for your component B on plant 000X and add the unit of measure PC (in 'Units of measure' TAB)
good luck

UoM issue due to multiple backend systems

Hi All,
We have multiple backend systems hooked up with the SRM system. One issue that we have is that many of the UoMs are different in the backend systems. For example, for THOUSANDS, we have TH and THO in different systems. As part of optimization we intend to include only 1 entry per UoM in SRM box.
The problem is if we put TH as the unit, then if it is chosen by a user linked to the backend system that does not have this Commercial unit, then the Shopping Cart fails when trying to create a follow-on document.
Any advice how we can get this resolved will be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards
Gaurav

Hi Gaurav,
Common problem when using multiple back-ends, which can be resolved rather easily. The best way to solve this is by a business change. That isu2026. synchronize the use of the UoMu2019s throughout the organization. This would be the most elegant solution. All back-ends will then have the same valueu2019s in their respective CUNI tables.
Off course the feasibility of this will depend on your organizational structure and the hitting the u2018right stringsu2019 in order to get every one to understand the importance of this.
As a back-up an other solution would be to create a Z-table which will translate the UoM used in the SRM system to the corresponding UoM in the respective back-endsu2026.. The table will have three columns. u2018SRM UoMu2019 u2013 u2018Back-end Systemu2019 u2013 Back-end UoM. Depending on the implementation scenario U use, you can have the interface to the back-end carry out the translation. For this you can use the available Badiu2019s: BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW, BBP_CREATE_BE_RQ_NEW, BBP_CREATE_BE_RS_NEW
Downside of this solution will be the extra maintenance effort for the Z-table. Best choice in my perspective would be the business change.
Kind Regards,
Skander

UOM issue of SR that push from third party integrated software into SAP

Dear SAP Expert/Guru,
Would like to seek for your advise what is to be done to check the issue of different UOM created in SR when push from thrid party intrgration software into SAP.
The material only being maintained 1 UOM which is PKT however, when the data being push from the integration software it created the material with the UOM CTN and this cause the whole SR cannot be used.
Is there any way to check between the data integration? The client is using BAPI to push the data.
Currently the client just implement PI module and the third party software is integrated with PI module.
Kindly advise is there any other way to check.
Thank you
Regards
Leonard Tan

Dear Shailesh & Jurgen,
Due to the T-code CUNI is maintained as Fire Fighter in the production server, so I only can use the QA server to analyst the UOM maintained in the server.
Below is the result of the analysis:-
ISO Code ISO code text
CT CTN
PK Pack (assuming this is used as packet)
As in the Change Units of Measurement of Dimension: Overview. THe result as shown:-
Unit Commercial Technical Meas.unit text
CTN KAR CTN Carton(SC)
PKT PKT Pkt Packet(s)
When double click the "Units of Measurement, select any unit and click on the lens, here you will see a small box called ALE/EDI, you will get to see the ISO Code in the box and a small checkbox called primary code"
There is no checking being clicked at the primary code and nothing is being keyed in the ISO code
Kindly advise what is to be done? is it the ISO issue or is there any setting being done wrongly.
Thank you
Regards
Leonard Tan

Dealer Excise Invoice-Issue while posting MIRO

Dear All,
Today i was doing Domestic procurement with Dealer for Gas Cylinder. In PO we entered total value which includes Excise amount also (1000+103)& VAT @ 14% (154,42).
While doing GR i selected as Only captured excise inv, checked MRP indicator.
Changed the bse value to 1000, entered BED as 100, E Cess as 2 & SEcess as 1.
The accounting entries were correct, Inventory is posting with Rs 1000
Posted excise invoice in J1IEX, the values were coming from GR, its correct and the acc entries were also OK with 103 Cenvat clearing acc Cr & Excise acc Dr.
While posting MIRO, I am facing problems...
In line item i am getting as 1103 Base value...
VAT is calculating on (1103+103) @ 14% 168.84,
so total value is 1271.84
When i simulate, its showing
Vendor 1271.84 Cr
GR/IR clg acc 1000 Dr
Material 103 Dr
VAT 168,84 Dr
There is no cenvat clearing account here
Please help me how to resolve this.
Regds,
CB
When i simulate

Hi,
have you mainatin 100% setoof condition check it it should be there
check MIRo posting date and excise invoice posting date
check condition record validity in FV13
Regards
Kailas Ugale
Edited by: kailasugale on Feb 10, 2012 12:01 PM

Excise UOM Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for