Exclude a version from the calculation

Hello,
In our model we have a version used uniquely to upload data. When the system starts to calculate, it includes this version.  We have tried to lock the version,but it still included in the calculation.
We would like to know if is possible to exclude this version from the calculation in order to optimize the calculation.
Thanks in advance,
Best regards

First of all, thanks for your responses.
We would like to develop option 1 from Michaels' solutions, because we have too much LineItems (about 2000) for the option two. So we think, option 1 will be easier.
The version we are going to exclude is "Initial Charge". Are you suggesting we should make next rule?
       Function CellValue
          RestrictDimension("Versions","Initial Charge")
          CellValue=0
      End Function
In case of  excluding a single period from that version, next rule would be correct?
      Function CellValue
         RestrictDimension("Versions","Initial Charge")
         RestrictDimension("Periods","January")
         CellValue=0
      End Function
Thanks again
Best regards!

Similar Messages

  • Accessibility, exclude UI elements from the Tab-chain

    Hi,
    I have a complex UI which is very uncomfortable to access with the Tab key when using sap-accesssibility=true parameter. The main problem are the many transparent containers, which are necessary to create the refined composition of the UI. They get focused when the Tab key is pressed and this is completely useless. I there a way to exclude UI elements from the Tab-chain?
    Best regards,
    Krasimir

    Hi,
    I have same prolem here.
    In my UI I am using mastercolumn for expand /collapse functionality in parent - child node .
    The problem is the keyboard tab-chain is skipping the master column which makes it a accessibility issue.
    Is there any way we can include/exclude UI elements from tab chain.
    My NWDS version is 7.0.10.

  • NX-OS - How include or exclude an OID from the SNMP view entry???

    Hi, I'm working with Nexus 7010 - System version: 5.1(3).
    For example, in the 7200 we can include or exclude an OID from the SNMP view entry using the command #snmp-server view.
    How can we include or exclude an OID from the SNMP view entry in the Nexus 7010???
    Thanks.

    Greetings Marcelo,
    SNMP views are not currently supported on NX-OS. You can use Role-based Access Control to restrict what SNMP users can manage which is somewhat limited in scope - mainly permit/deny read/write access to specific features.
    Cheers,
    /Phil

  • After upgrading to Yosemite I have lost iPhoto. It has a cross through it in Finder, but I clicked on it and I was directed to download the latest version from the App store, but it is not available in the Australian store. Can anyone help?

    After upgrading to Yosemite I have lost iPhoto. It has a cross through it in Finder, but I clicked on it and I was directed to download the latest version from the App store, but it is not available in the Australian store. Can anyone please help? I am not an advanced user and I would like my photos back, having had no idea I would lose iPhoto in the upgrade!

    Thanks petermac87...but for some reason, the only purchases showing are OS. So assuming iPhoto is in Mountain Lion, I was hoping to look under Hidden Items there as you suggested, but there is no option for that. Only option is to download Mountain Lion again, not iPhoto specifically. Any ideas welcome!

  • Is it possible to exclude single contacts from the mute? For example: I want to hear when I recieve an SMS alert even if I mute my iPhone 4.

    Is it possible to exclude single contacts from the mute? For example: I want to hear when I recieve an SMS alert even if I mute my iPhone 4 (I am a fireman).

    No iPhone apps have access to the necessary API's to do so...they're all sandboxed.

  • How to find out the BI Publisher Version from the Excel output file

    Hi,
    Can any one tell me How to find out the BI Publisher Version from the Excel output file generated using BI publisher.

    Take a look at it in notepad or a text viewer... it's just a MIME/HTML file...
    Example:
    From: "Created by Oracle BI Publisher 10.1.3.4.0" <>
    Subject: Created by Oracle BI Publisher 10.1.3.4.

  • How to find out the BI Publisher Version from the Excel output generated.

    Hi
    Can any one tell me How to find out the BI Publisher Version from the Excel output file generated using BI publisher.
    Edited by: 781689 on Aug 1, 2010 10:22 PM

    Hello,
    This forum is the "Oracle Reports" OTN Forum.
    The "BI Publisher" OTN Forum is here :
    BI Publisher
    Regards

  • Hi, I have recently downloaded a trial version of Ps CC (up until then I have used Ps CS6). All my presets have migrated to the CC version from the CS6 one. However, I can't find any of the plug-ins which I have in CS6, such as Imagenomic Noiseware, Googl

    Hi, I have recently downloaded a trial version of Ps CC (I am still using Ps CS6). All my presets have migrated very nicely to the CC version from the CS6 one. However, I can't find any of the plug-ins which I have in CS6, such as Imagenomic Noiseware, Google NIK Collection, etc. in the CC version. How do I "migrate" the plug-ins to Ps CC? I would appreciate some help with this. Thanks

    Plug-Ins are not Presets.  You need to install Plug-in into CC just like you had to install Plug-ins into CS6.

  • Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA

    Issue Summary
    In Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72 and Java 1.8 Update 25 Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA.  We've noticed this with Oracle Forms and Reports 11g where we have forms that specify Java 1.6 Update 20.  We used to be able to specify Java 1.6 Update 26 in our Ruleset, but now the only version a that works in our ruleset is Java 1.6 Update 20 which is the same version requested by the JPI-Version attribute of the jar.  The long term solution would be to upgrade Oracle Forms and Reports, however this isn't currently in the cards.
    RuleSet.xml Test
    Ruleset.xml
    1 
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    &lt;ruleset version=&quot;1.0+&quot;&gt;  
    &lt;rule&gt;
       &lt;id location=&quot;*.javatester.org&quot; /&gt;
       &lt;action permission=&quot;run&quot; version=&quot;1.6*&quot; /&gt;
    &lt;/rule&gt;
    &lt;ruleset version=&quot;1.0+&quot;&gt;
    &lt;rule&gt;
       &lt;id location=&quot;*.internaldomain.name&quot; /&gt;
       &lt;action permission=&quot;run&quot; version=&quot;1.6*&quot; /&gt;
    &lt;/rule&gt;
    &lt;/ruleset&gt;
    Test 1 (Control)
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 51 b13 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    Deployment Ruleset works as expected for both URLs
    Test 2
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 72 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    The RuleSet works for JavaTester.org however on internaldomain.name we get the following error:
    With the trace logging turned on, I suspected the version attribute supplied by the RIA. I was able to trick Java by adding the following to my system deployment.properties file:
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_20
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files (x86)\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
    Because the RIA requests 1.6.0_20 it matches 1.6* from the deployment ruleset sooner than 1.6.0_26. However, if 1.6.0_20 is not available 1.6.0_26 should match according to the Deployment Rule Set documentation:
    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html
    The version of the JRE that is used is determined by the following order of precedence:
    1. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    2. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    3. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches the version attribute.
    4. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches the version attribute.
    If no version is available that meets the criteria, then the RIA is blocked, and a message is shown to the user. To provide a custom message, include the message element.
    As a result:
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA and 1.6.0_20 is listed in the deployment.properties file, #1 matches.
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA, but 1.6.0_20 is NOT listed in the deployment.properties file the #1 SHOULD match, but doesn’t. It used to match up-to and including JRE 1.7 Update 51 however the ruleset appears to no longer match in subsequent versions.
    #2 should never match with our current Deployment Ruleset. It would match if we specified 1.7* as a version in the Ruleset.xml.
    #3 used to be broken as well after JRE 1.7 Update 51 however this bug has been marked as fixed. See: http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8032781
    I have reproduced this issue with Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72, and Java 1.8 Update 25 when one of these versions are installed with Java 1.6 Update 26.

    I can't seem to edit this post anymore, for some odd reason.
    So here goes;
    I found this post in NVIDIA's knowledge base;
    When installing an after-market graphics card into a certified Windows 8 PC with UEFI enabled, the s...
    The interesting parts in this post are as follows;
    When an after-market graphics card is installed into a motherboard with UEFI enabled in the system BIOS, or if the system is a certified Windows 8 PC with Secure Boot enabled, the system may not boot.
    UEFI is a new system BIOS feature that is provided on most new motherboards. A UEFI system BIOS is required in order for the Windows 8 Secure Boot feature to work. Secure boot is enabled by default on certified Windows 8 PCs.
    In order to get the PC to boot with a graphics card that does not contain UEFI firmware, the end-user must first disable the secure boot feature in the system's SBIOS before installing the graphics card.
    Note: Some system SBIOS's incorporate a feature called compatibility boot. These systems will detect a non-UEFI-enabled firmware VBIOS and allow the user to disable secure boot and then proceed with a compatibility boot. If the system contains a system SBIOS the supports compatibility boot, the user will need to disable secure boot when asked during boot process
    This leads me to believe that the BIOS update that wrecked my setup was 9SKT58A/9SJT58A, which only contains one change;
    "Adds support for updating BIOS from a WIN7 BIOS to a WIN8 BIOS".
    I've just ordered a cheap UEFI-compatible GT640 from Gainward, so I hope I'll be able to try that out this weekend.

  • Copying the numbers from the calculator widget.

    Hello!
    Is it me, or it is impossible to copy the numbers from the calculator widget in 10.6.3?
    Thanks,
    Chris.

    It happened again! I don't understand!
    I did a test: I restarted the computer. I typed in the calculator. Copied, and pasted in Mail. Worked fine.
    After, I opened Illustrator CS3. Copied something from there, and pasted it in Flash. Worked fine.
    After, I went back to the calculator, copied the numbers, and when I pasted the numbers in Mail, it's Illustrator's graphics that pasted instead of the numbers.
    After, I went on the net, copied text from a site. Pasted it in Mail. Worked fine. Went back to the calculator, copied, and the pasted text was the text from the Website, and not from the calculator.
    This is very frustrating!
    Any idea on my problem?
    Thanks,
    Chris.

  • Will the iphone 6 plus work in pakistan if i buy the unlocked and contract free version from the apple store?

    will the iphone 6 plus work in pakistan if i buy the unlocked and contract free version from the apple store? why is t mobile written on top of the button? it is so confusing no one will give me a straight answer on this. if i buy that one, would there be any monthly charges involved or not?

    Are you planning on flying to and visiting the US?  That is the only way you are going to get an iPhone from the Apple store because you will not be able to purchase one from the Apple store online and get it sent to Pakistan - it can't be done and Apple online stores will not ship internationally.
    You have not got a straight answer to this question because there is none.  The phone has T-Mobile on the top button, because it is a T-Mobile phone and although sold as contract free, but NOT unlocked - notice the difference, it still comes with a T-Mobile sim card.
    The phone may or may not work in Paskistan and if you do buy the phone, to ensure that it has the best possible chance of working is to take the T-Mobile sim card out of the phone first and DO NOT activate the phone using the T-Mobile sim.  If you want to use it in Pakistan, then activate it with your local Pakistan sim card and you will not be paying any charges to T-Mobile if you do this.  If you do happen to accidentally activate the phone with the T-Mobile sim card in it, then you will have a contract with them and yes, you will have a monthly bill with T-Mobile and you will need to keep this contract for 40 days, until you can get the phone unlocked by them.
    Also note, that if you buy the phone it may not work on 4G networks in Pakistan due to frequency differences and also you will have no warranty cover for the phone in Pakistan - iPhone warranty is NOT international, so country of original purchase, so the US, which means you have to fly back there - no postage accepted.
    So basically, the phone should work in Pakistan, but not on the 4G networks and you need to take the T-Mobile sim card out before you activate it and activate it using a local sim card and you will have NO warranty cover for the phone in Pakistan.

  • What do I do with my old CS4 when downloading the new versions from the cloud?

    What do I do with my old CS4 when downloading the new versions from the cloud?
    Do I just uninstall via the control panel on my computer?

    if you no longer need cs4, deactivate it (help>deactivate) and uninstall it.
    otherwise, leave it installed along with cc.  you can use both if you need.

  • Find System Firmware Version from the OS rather than ALOM

    I want to update a few T2000 Solaris servers to Firmware 6.4.6,
    but this question is really about finding the firware version from the OS.
    At the ALOM prompt sc>, you can just enter "showhost" and it
    provides a line like "Sun System Firmware 7.1.5.b 2008/08/05 16:58"
    Is there ANY way to find the firmware version from the operating
    system as root without having to go into the ALOM?
    Thanks, Steve K

    Yes, 'prtdiag' could help on that. The reason you are not able to see your SysFW version could be a matter of Patchs. See this output below from 'prtdiag':
    (...snippet...)
    0850NNN07F:CH/PS0 PS enabled
    0850NNN07F:CH/PS1 PS enabled
    ============================ FW Version ============================
    Version
    System Firmware 6.7.11 2010/10/12 12:33
    ====================== System PROM revisions =======================
    Version
    OBP 4.30.4.b 2010/07/09 13:48
    Chassis Serial Number
    0XX0NXNXXF
    If your T2000 is not up-to-date, the only way you will have its from System processor 'showhost' command:
    sc> showhost
    System Firmware 6.2.6 Sun Fire[TM] T2000 2006/10/06 12:36
    Host flash versions:
    Hypervisor 1.2.3 2006/08/18 12:25
    OBP 4.23.4 2006/08/04 20:46
    Sun Fire[TM] T2000 POST 4.23.4 2006/08/04 21:15
    Cheers.!
    </SQ>

  • I am trying to crop faces from old family group photos and paste them on to records in Family Tree Maker. When I do this, the pasted cropped image reverts to the original of the entire family. Is there a way of unlinking the original version from the crop

    I am trying to crop faces from old family group photos and paste them on to records in Family Tree Maker. When I do this, the pasted cropped image reverts to the original of the entire family. Is there a way of unlinking the original version from the cropped image?

    Are you copying the cropped images directly from Aperture's Browser window and then pasting into your family tree?
    It would be safer to export the cropped faces as new image files to a folder on your disk, and then drag them from there to the "Family Tree" window.
    To export select the cropped image versions in Aperture's browser and use the command "File > Export > Version". Select a suitable export preset from the pop-up menu, for example "Jpeg fit into ..." and select a folder to export to.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Any hints of how to exclude these lines from the following BEx output?

    Hi,
    I have a BEx report which outputs the following shipment activities, showing Doc and Items numbers, Requested and Received dates, actual and PO quantities.
    DocNoItmNoReqDate-RcvdDate-PO_Qty-Act_Qty---TB%
    1101-----5--12/10/05-12/5/05020--
    80
    1101-----5--12/10/05#00--80
    1101-----5--12/10/05#200--
    80
    1101-----7--12/10/05-12/5/05030--
    50
    1101-----7--12/10/05-12/8/0505--
    50
    1101-----7--12/10/05#00--50
    1101-----7--12/10/05#350--
    50
    Somehow, I am getting some activity lines which I do not understand but do not want in the output. Those are the lines which show u201CPO_Qty = 0 AND Act_Qty = 0 at the same time.u201D i.e. the highlighted lines.
    Any hint on how to eliminate the highlighted lines from the output?
    I played with calculated key figures but could not reason it out.
    Thanks

    DocNoItmNoReqDate-RcvdDate-PO_Qty-Act_Qty---  Formula                        TB%                                                                               
    PO QTY + ACT QTY
    1101-----5--12/10/05-12/5/05020-----               20                        -
    80
    1101-----5--12/10/05#00--                 0                         -80
    1101-----5--12/10/05#200-----                  20                     -
    80
    1101-----7--12/10/05-12/5/05030-----                30                      -
    50
    1101-----7--12/10/05-12/8/0505--
                    5                         -
    50
    1101-----7--12/10/05#00-----                  0                         -50
    1101-----7--12/10/05#350-----                 35                        -
    50
    Create Conditions over the Formula. Since the sum would be always 0 only when both the KF's are zero I think you can create condition over this formula.
    Would this help?
    Regards
    VJ

Maybe you are looking for