Excluding items with journalctl?

Since I started looking at the nice filtering journalctl has for its output, this has been bothering me, but I haven't been able to find an answer in the man pages (or anywhere else). Is there a way, when calling journalctl, to filter by excluding certain items rather than specifying what to include and having journalctl exclude everything else? For example, to filter out messages from sudo in journalctl's output without touching anything else? And yes, I know it's possible to use --no-pager and pipe the output through grep -v or something similar, I'm just curious as to whether this is something the built-in filtering is capable of.

Are you looking for something like
# journalctl /usr/bin/sudo
EDIT:
Another example I want to see transmission-daemon logs only:
# journalctl /usr/bin/transmission-daemon
I saw these in the 'examples' section of the man page
Last edited by ixnine (2012-10-06 05:59:27)

Similar Messages

Exclude line items with has no batch when we create a delivery

Hi All,
How can i Exclude line items with has no batch(Batch determination not found)when we create a delivery from sales order. Is there any user exit to prevent line items with has no batch number. I appreciate your help.
thanks,
Nara.

Hi
Can you try by putting some custom code in the include MV50AFZZ/mv50afz1/mv50afz2/mv50afz3/mv50afzk/mv50afzl. These are all exit.
Thanks
Chinmoy
Message was edited by: Chinmoy Ghosh

Exclude items in payment run

Hi Expert,
During payment run, the system clear the open items with zero-balance due; but we want to eliminate this functionality and instead add another scenario.
One of the suggestion is to customize BTE 1820; and exclude these items in the selection.
Will you able to help me in how to perform this scenario? Maybe an ABAP logic or example will be very helpful
Any suggestion for this scenario?
Thanks
Lon

Dear,
I want to use BTE 1830 but unable to use. Kindly help me on this.
My blog is: Re: Eliminate vendor in payment run

Time Machine has been excluding items for hours... and counting!

I have been using time capsule for several years now. But today I brought a new hard drive to use with Time Machine. It's a Western Digital My Book Network drive.
Plugged it in selected the new disk and started to back up. For hours now it has been 'Excluding items..'. It has apparently excluded over 5 million items! Why is it doing this?
I've checked the list of files to exclude and it's just set to exclude the desktop and the Downloads folder.
I don't understand why it has been excluding items so long. Nothing had been copied to the external disk yet. If anyone could help me I'd be much apreciative!
Thanks, George!

georgeShawkins wrote:
Well now I have this new hard drive
You may avoid some confusion and/or problems by not calling it that. It's a +Network Attached Storage+ (NAS) device, or +network drive.+ Yes, it contains a hard drive, but OSX handles it very differently for many purposes. You've already seen that you can't format it via Disk Utility, for example.
I'd rather not have erase the whole disk and put the wanted data back onto it.
If you can copy that 50GB elsewhere temporarily, erase the drive, then copy it back, that may be much faster and easier than deleting the Backups.backupdb folder. It contains at least several hundred thousand, perhaps over a million items, that OSX must delete one at a time. It may also have permissions or other problems.
Erasing, however, takes only a few moments.
This is why we recommend giving Time Machine its own, exclusive space. See #3 in Time Machine - Frequently Asked Questions (or use the link in *User Tips* at the top of this forum).
Are you putting other things on the network drive? If so, you may have problems there, too, as Time Machine will eventually use all the empty space available to it.
Those backups will be inside a rather odd container called a +sparse bundle.+ If you're really on Leopard, as per your signature, you can limit the maximum size of the sparse bundle, per #A8 of Time Machine - Troubleshooting (or use the link in *User Tips* at the top of this forum).
But since you've posted in the +Snow Leopard+ Time Machine forum, if you're on 10.6.3 or later, that won't "stick," so you may want to see if you can partition the network drive via WD's software (another thing you can't do on a network drive via +Disk Utility,+ unfortunately).

Purchase contract print preview is displaying items with DEL_IND='X'

Hi,
We are using SRM Server 5.5 and have a situation described below
A purchasing contract is created with, for example, 2 items with status as 'Held' . In change mode, the one item is deleted and the purchasing contract is Released.
When the button 'Output Preview' is pressed, the system displays the print preview with both the irems although one item is deleted.
I am trying to find SAP notes for this but I didn't find any relavent note.
I found one note for not displaying 'Inactive' status items however not found anything for excluding deleted items from print preview.
Appreciate your inputs on this.
Thanks and Regards,
Sambhaji Chawale

Thanks Georg for your inputs.
Yes, you are correct we are using custom developed smart form and not SAP Standard. We will be updating the smartform for adding the condition of u201Cselect items with deletion indicator=u2019Blanku2019.
However we are interested in the standard solution that SAP has provided to cover this. I don't see this condition in SAP standard smart form so this must have been covered through some program code.
Does anybody have idea on this.
Thanks and Regards,
Sambhaji Chawale

Time Machine excluding items....

Hi,
Newly installed Server 10.6.6 Mac Pro.
When enabling Time Machine to backup the boot drive onto a 2nd internal drive it starts, and then starts "excluding items" and backs up only 40MB in the end while there's over 130GB of stuff to back up. There are no folders set to be excluded, the TM drive is newly formatted and empty.
Re-added the drive through system preferences, reset spotlight, trashed the preferences... everything we tried has failed. Any thoughts on this ?
Thanks,
Jay

Hi
http://manuals.info.apple.com/enUS/ServerAdminv10.6.pdf
Pages 36, 37 and 155 onwards. Time Machine is not really a 'backup' solution for OSX Server itself as such, especially if dealing with Mail and Open Directory Databases amongst others. It can also cause lock ups for clients accessing and changing data in configured share points although your mileage may vary. It's actually OK as a Time Machine destination for client workstations.
Tony

Time Machine ignoring excluded items (performing full backup)

Hi.
I started having problems with Time Machine recently.
My macbook hard drive has 250 GB, 80 GB free. In the Time Machine preference pane options I have selected a couple of folders so that an "estimated full backup" is 52.9 GB. When I'm running TM it tries to backup the full drive (160GB) ignoring the folders I chose to exclude.
I have verified and repaired both my main hard drive and the external drive used for Time Machine.
The log in the console initially says that it is going to backup 44GB and then it continues copying more data:
1/24/10 10:14:02 PM com.apple.backupd[378] Starting standard backup
1/24/10 10:14:03 PM com.apple.backupd[378] Backing up to: /Volumes/Time Machine Backups/Backups.backupdb
1/24/10 10:14:10 PM com.apple.backupd[378] Backup content size: 157.0 GB excluded items size: 113.0 GB for volume Macintosh HD
1/24/10 10:14:10 PM com.apple.backupd[378] No pre-backup thinning needed: 53.73 GB requested (including padding), 260.74 GB available
1/24/10 11:14:04 PM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 4.1 GB of 44.0 GB, 1471 of 782012 items
1/25/10 12:14:05 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 6.3 GB of 44.0 GB, 20599 of 782012 items
1/25/10 1:14:06 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 9.0 GB of 44.0 GB, 48709 of 782012 items
1/25/10 2:14:06 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 11.1 GB of 44.0 GB, 124469 of 782012 items
1/25/10 3:14:07 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 21.9 GB of 44.0 GB, 155468 of 782012 items
1/25/10 4:14:08 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 42.0 GB of 44.0 GB, 156348 of 782012 items
1/25/10 5:14:08 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 62.5 GB of 62.5 GB, 156455 of 782012 items
1/25/10 6:14:09 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 83.1 GB of 83.1 GB, 156517 of 782012 items
1/25/10 7:14:10 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 103.7 GB of 103.7 GB, 156648 of 782012 items
1/25/10 7:56:21 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 183712 files (114.1 GB) from volume Macintosh HD.
1/25/10 7:56:23 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Backup canceled.
1/25/10 7:57:55 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Stopping backupd to allow ejection of backup destination disk!
1/25/10 8:20:53 AM [0x0-0xb50b5].backupd-helper[2308] Not starting Time Machine backup after wake - failed to resolve alias to backup volume
1/25/10 8:46:07 AM com.apple.backupd-auto[2421] Not starting scheduled Time Machine backup - time machine destination not resolvable.
Thanks for the help!

Hi, and welcome to the forums.
We have seen this on rare occasions.
Start by Repairing your Time Machine drive and verifying your internal HD, per #A5 in the Time Machine - Troubleshooting *User Tip,* also at the top of this forum.
Also do a "full reset" of Time Machine via #A4 there.
If that doesn't help, there's probably something corrupted in OSX.
You'll need to reinstall it from your Snow Leopard Install disc, then download and install the "combo" update to get back to 10.6.2. Info and download available at: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL959 Be sure to do a +Repair Permissions+ via Disk Utility (in your Applications/Utilities folder) afterwards.

Vendor Line item with Opening and Closing Balances report regarding

Dear All,
I need a report for vendor line items with Opening and Closing balances.
Thanks in advance
Sateesh

Hi
Try S_ALR_87012082 - Vendor Balances in Local Currency
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Duplicate records for Sale Order Cycle Report(excluding item level detail)

I have posted this issue in number of forums but till today no one is able to answer it correctly.Here it is:
I need to create a report which I think most of the sd consultants have also done it.It basically covers sales order cycle without item lvel detail such as:
Sale Order No -- Sales Order Date-- Delivery No-- Delivery Date
Now as we all know ,sales orders and deliveries are connected through item table which means in the output I will get duplicate rows for the report above.For Example, if a sales order share 3 items with the delivery then we will get 3 exact duplicate rows in the report.
What can be the best solution?connecting through VBFA has alos same result as it also has item level details.
I need a good solution.This a common report and there must be some solution

Hiiii,
It is standard SAP rule that system will catch the document flow (document link history) at item level.
Now your problem that you dont want to show the line item based report because of duplicacy.
Try this.
Brows table VBFA -
In screen selection select the following......
1. Subsiquent document category
2. Preceding item
select "J" in Subsiquent document category
and "000010" in Preceding item then execute the table.
Now system will not show multple line item based delivery report. so No duplicacy will be there
Regards
Shambhu Sarkar

De-link PPM Item with SAP Project

Hello,
Can somebdoy throw a light on what to do in case I want to de-link a PPM-item with SAP project.This situation may rise if I want to change the project actuals going to bucket A to bucket B.As I can not change the relationship of an item with the bucket, I am looking for alternate solution where I can de-link SAP Project with SAP PPM item.
thank you!
Regards,
Mahendra

Hi Mahendra
If you are meaning to de-link a PS Project from a PPM Item, you can from the Item navigate to the 'Relationships' tab and then on the 'object links'sub-tab select and delete the assignment:
You can also remove a cProject relationship by clicking the 'Related Objects' sub-tab
Your comment that you cannot move an Item to a new Bucket - is this because your business process does not allow you to do so? Because this is definitely possible in the system.
Let me know if you have any further questions as I am not sure I have addressed your question
Regards
C

SharePoint Search Service upgrade to 2013 fails: "Inner Exception: An item with the same key has already been added."

Here's the situation:
Upgrading a SharePoint Server 2010 Search Service Application dB to our SharePoint 2013 SP 1 development environment, using the Management Shell
Running the following commands:
$applicationPool= Get-SPServiceApplicationPool -Identity 'SearchService_AppPool'
$searchInst = Get-SPEnterpriseSearchServiceInstance -local
Restore-SPEnterpriseSearchServiceApplication -Name 'SearchServiceApplication' -applicationpool $applicationPool -databasename 'SearchServiceApplicationDB' -databaseserver SERVERNAME -AdminSearchServiceInstance $searchInst
Creates the search dBs (crawl, links, analytics) successfully; however, in the end, I get....
"Exception: Action 15.0.107.0 of Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Upgrade.SearchAdminDatabaseSequence failed."
Looking at the ULS logs, I find the following:
Inner Exception: An item with the same key has already been added.
at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.Insert(TKey key, TValue value, Boolean add) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.OOTBSchemaDefinition.FindAndFixExistingManagedProperties() at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.OOTBSchemaDefinition.InstallManagedProperties(Boolean
upgrade) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.OOTBSchemaDefinition.Upgrade() at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Upgrade.UpdateAllOOTBProperties.Upgrade() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPActionSequence.Upgrade()
Exception: Action 15.0.107.0 of Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Upgrade.SearchAdminDatabaseSequence failed.
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPActionSequence.Upgrade() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPDatabaseSequence.Upgrade() at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Upgrade.SearchDatabaseSequence.Upgrade() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.Upgrade(Object
o, Boolean bRecurse)
Anyone encounter anything like this during their search upgrade process? I'm not honestly even sure what duplicate value to look for at this point, if I were to run a SELECT Id, ClassId, ParentId, Name, Status, Version, Properties FROM Objects on
"SharePoint_Config" in SSMS. Any insight or opinions on the matter are welcome; and thanks to those who choose to reply to this, in advance.

Hi ,
You can enable the ULS log on verbose level (note, remember to reset to default level after finished troubleshooting) for more information per the following article, then check there should be more useful message for helping solve the issue.
http://www.brightworksupport.com/enabling-verbose-logging-to-compare-against-c/
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/12c99279-d3aa-46de-bc57-d5d250692ff0/upgrade-of-search-service-application-from-2010-to-2013-failure?forum=sharepointadmin
https://www.simple-talk.com/blogs/2014/04/22/sharepoint-2010-to-2013-search-service-application-upgrade-issueaction-15-0-80-0-fails/http://blogs.msdn.com/b/biyengar/archive/2009/10/27/psconfig-failure-with-error-an-item-with-the-same-key-has-already-been-added.aspx
Thanks,
Daniel Yang
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

How to get all properties for an item with search?

How can I get all crawled / managed properties back of an item with the search API (REST, client, or server)?
Currently I am only aware of specifying the applicable properties specifcally by using the selectproperties parameters via REST:
http://host/site/_api/search/query?querytext='terms'&selectproperties='Path,Url,Title,Author'
(taken from http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nadeemis/archive/2012/08/24/sharepoint-2013-search-rest-api.aspx)
I don't want to do this. I just want to get all properties back that
are associated with the search results.

Its my understanding that standard managed properties will be returned, like: Created Date, Last Date Modified, Author, Title, etc. However, if you need more than that you will need to specify the properties to return.
This blog post also has a similar thought process:
http://www.blendmaster.net/blog/2012/09/view-managed-property-value-in-sharepoint-2013-using-search-rest-api/
Brandon Atkinson
Blog: http://brandonatkinson.blogspot.com

Cannot backup my files / copy my files and folders due to error message " The operation can't be completed because an item with the name ".DS_Store" already exists. "

Hi Apple community!
I have a [rather worrying] problem.
When I try to copy all my files from my documents on my mac [or the entire documents folder] into an external drive, I get this error message
" The operation can’t be completed because an item with the name “.DS_Store” already exists. "
I am not given an option to skip this file or anything else.
But I simply cannot complete the operation!
I have tried deleting a few of the .ds_store files, [both in the original and in the destinations]
but no success.
The same thing keeps happening.
At first, this was just happening when I was trying to backup to my dropbox folder [the one on my mac's harddrive, which gets synced to the cloud],
but then I tried to back up my documents to my external hard drive, and I realized it is giving me the same error message.
So effectively, it seems I cannot backup my files anywhere!
Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, or by corruption of certain system caches.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. Note: If FileVault is enabled on some models, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain iMacs. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin. Test while in safe mode. Same problem? After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

Error message "The operation can't be completed because an item with the name .DS_Store already exists"

Major headaches with copying files and folders between drives. I constantly (and I mean constantly) have to resort to copying files across in small batches (fewer than 10 works best) because anytime I try to copy lots of files and folders from my mac to an external hard drive (or from one external HD to a second external HD), I ALWAYS get the error message "The operation can't be completed because an item with the name .DS_Store already exists".
The files and folders are all Mac-generated, so hint or trace of foreign OSs in the mix.
All file types are susceptible
the HDs are all Mac OS X formatted, no foreign file formats involved
the HDs are all journal-enabled, OS X extended formats
have looked on here for previous posts, past suggestion was to disable creation of DS_Store files - not really a solution and realistically, defeats the purpose of their creation
any ideas anyone?
would appreciate any thoughts or sugestions, this has got me beat
the context is that I have a lot of image files that I am copying (trying to...) new external 3TB drives for backup and the job appears endless if I have to do this in batches of 10 or so..!
many thanks for any suggestions

This is definitively a nuisance. When copying large amounts of files between volumes try opening a terminal window and use use ditto. You need to type the directory paths of the source and the destination volume. When it starts ditto just coupes and optionally overwrites anything on the destination. You can get a verbose mode where it lists all activities.
gunnars-mac-mini-i7:Volumes gunnar$ man ditto
NAME
     ditto -- copy directory hierarchies, create and extract archives
SYNOPSIS
     ditto [-v] [-V] [-X] [<options>] src ... dst_directory
     ditto [-v] [-V] [<options>] src_file dst_file
     ditto -c [-z | -j | -k] [-v] [-V] [-X] [<options>] src dst_archive
     ditto -x [-z | -j | -k] [-v] [-V] [<options>] src_archive ... dst_directory
     ditto -h | --help

Problem with copying to external drives 10.8.3 "the operation can't be completed because an item with the name .ds_store exists"

After upgrading from 10.7.5 to 10.8.3 I cannot copy certain folders to any external drive. the operation can't be completed because an item with the name .ds_store exists. I have seen this problem in discussions for many years with no real solution. Does anyone have a resolution? Please help. This is very frustrating as I work in two locations and copy folders back in forth all the time.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, or by a peripheral device.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including Wi-Fi on certain iMacs. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin. Test while in safe mode. Same problem? After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

Excluding items with journalctl?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for