Excluding records with 0 quantity in cube 0SD_C15

Hello BWers,
I'm attempting to load the condition values into 0SD_15 via 2LIS_13_VDKON. However I get an error message from the update rules:
"Arithmetical errors or conversion errors found in routine ROUTINE_0001 record 98"
The reason for the error seems to be that the 0KPRICE info object (Condition rate) is including a formula looking like this:
KNVAL / INV_QTY
...where KNVAL is the 'condition value' and INV_QTY is the 'billing quantity'.
This means that when the either one of these objects are 0 (zero) then there will be an error for the record.
I need to exclude the records which have a zero value for these two objects..
Which is the easiest way to do this?
- ABAP in the info source?
- ABAP in the update rules?
- some other setting?
How could the code look for this?
Best regards,
Fredrik

I have switched to expert mode in order to be able to enter the code. It looks like this:
IF KNVAL <> initial and INV_QTY <> initial.
Price = KNVAL / INV_QTY
endif.
However, I'm getting this error message:
'Opening parenthesis "(" expected'
How should the code look?
Best regards,
Fredrik

Similar Messages

Exclude records with value 0 for calculated KF

Hi, experts,
How do I Exclude records with value 0 for calculated KF without using condition? I'm using version 7
Appreciate any help you can provide.
Thank You!
Alina

Hi,
We didn't understood ur requirement well.
1) Lets say, you have 3 KF. and you are doing CKF1 and you don't want to show the records with Zero, In that case you can go with Zero Record Supression.
2) If you want to try to delete only KF/CKF where there is zero, it won't work as others may have values in them and you may miss the whole record set in the report
3) If the zero result is part of calculation, then please go ahead as explained above.
Please explain clearly if this is what you have or is it different ?
Regards,
-S-

No microphone recording with cub

HELLO,
I can record with the microphone with the windows wave recorder or other softs like n-track studio, but not with CUBASE. Only CUBASE does'nt get the input from the microphone
Any help please
Thanks?

Hmmm... It depends but, I guess that you have not configured the I/Os in Cubase yet. It's all described in Cubase Manuals so .... Ifyou don't have the manuals then, yo be able to Dl those from ftp://ftp.steinberg.net
jutapa?

How-To allow records with Overlapping Time from SAP R/3

Hi guys,
Made reference to SAP Note 336229.
Maintained my Transfer Rules of Data Source 0HR_PA_PA_1 to Info Source 0HR_PA_PA_1 and all is green! Unfortunately, still NO data and error IDOC message is " The data request was a full update. In this case, the corresponding table in the source system does not contain any data."
"The extractor of the DataSource reads the master data tables of the Employee (0EMPLOYEE) and person (0PERSON) InfoObjects and makes changes to these time-dependent attributes available as headcount changes"...says SAP
Info Object person (0PERSON) works!!!, however Info Object(0EMPLOYEE) is giving me problem whereby in SAP R/3 Data Source (Employee - Education and Training) 0EMPLOYEE_0022_ATTR allows time overlapping of records, BUT BW generates an error " The time interval ['99991231'/'19930104'] & (from/to) for the data records 46 and 47 overlaps in characteristic 0EMPLOYEE "
For example, lets assume there is Employee X with the following entry in SAP R/3.
Begin Date||| End Date ||| SubType
01.09.2003||| 01.09.2004||| Professional Cert.
01.09.2003||| 01.09.2006||| Degree
SAP R/3 allows this overlapping of time records however, BW does NOT. How can I tackle this overlapping issue in SAP BW?
With much appreciation!

Hi guys,
Please assist to resolve this.
I attempted to assigned 0DATETO and 0DATEFROM to my attributes of 0EMPLOYEE, but it gives me the following error
 Characteristic 0EMPLOYEE: Attribute 0DATETO cannot be used w. time-dependent attribte
 InfoObject 0DATETO cannot be used as an attribute if attibutes already exist that are time-dependent. Attribute 0ANSALARY is such an attribute. A field in the InfoObject 0DATETO is automatically generated in the master data table.
Once again, what I want is to be able to allow the Records with HighDate in R/3 into my BW Cubes.
Please please assist !

2lis_02_scl extract records with wrong posting date for Good Receipts.

Hi Experts,
We are currently having issue of mismatch between BW Schedule Line data with R/3 values for the Goods Receipts posting date updating incorrectly in to BW.
Example.
In table EKBE purchase order history we have following records.
MANDT EBELN        EBELP   ZEKKN VGABE GJAHR BELNR      BUZEI BEWTP BWART BUDAT      MENGE
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0001 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0002 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0003 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012693310 0001 E     101   26.02.2010        1.250,000
Which means we have on posting date of 23.01.2010 1250*3 i.e. 3750 quantity of Goods Receipts.
However when we check the extractor we get multiple records in internal table C_T_DATA and in psa.
Line BWV ETENR   SLFDT              MENGE    ROCA BEDAT                            BUDAT          EBELN
       ORG                                                        NCEL
1     001     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
2     001     0002     20100226     1250.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
3     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
4     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
5     003     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
6     003     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
7     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
8     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
9     002     0002     20100226     1250.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
As can be seen we have record no 8 for ETENR (Schedule line 1) with posting date 26.02.2010 and another record with posting date 23.01.2010.
Since we are getting 2 records the record with incorrect posting date overwrites the record with correct one.
Any idea if this could be a standard extractor problem or any other way to resolve this issue.
Any help would be appreciated.

First of all, are you using a staging DSO? (You should ideally)
If yes, is it a Write Optimized DSO? (Again, this is ideal)
If its a standard DSO, the values maybe over-writing upon activation.
You have 3 records (quantity = 1250 * 3) that have been receipted on 23.01.2010, where Posting Date = 23.01.2010.
You also have a record (quantity = 1250 * 1) that has been receipted on 26.01.2010. Posting date = 26.01.2010.
Now, in RSA3 & in PSA you can see more records than intended.
This is because you have before & after images. (ROCANCEL = X or blank).
ROCANCEL = X --> Before Image (record before change)
ROCANCEL = blank --> After Image (record after change)
This is a standard property of the extractor.
Now, we also have something known as BWVORG (Process Keys). Each process, i.e. creating a PO, Goods Receipt, Invoice etc.. have different Process Keys.
Creation - 001
Goods Rcpt. - 002
Invoice - 003
We can see that record 8, i.e. BWVORG = 002 (GR) has been modified on 26.01.2010.
That is why there is before image and after image.
Which one should be the correct posting date? 23.01.2010?
Normally in a Write optimized DSO, you will have all the records (before and after images & others as well).
I hope this helps.
Please let me know if otherwise.

Duplicate record with same primary key in Fact table

Hi all,
Can the fact table have duplicate record with same primary key . When i checked a cube i could see records with same primary key combination but the key figure values are different. My cube has 6 dimentions (Including Time,Unit and DP) and 2 key figures. So 6 fields combined to form the composite primary key of the fact table. When i checked the records in se16 i could see duplicate records with same primary key. Ther are no parallel loading happening for the cube.
BW system version is 3.1
Data base is : Oracle 10.2
I am not sure how is this possible.
Regards,
PM

Hi Krish,
I checked the datapacket dimention also. Both the record have same dimention id (141). Except the Keyfigure value there is no other change in the Fact table record. I know this is against the basic DBMS primary key rule. But i have records like this in the cube.
Can this situation arise when same records is there in different data packet of same request.
Thx,
PM
null

Materials with Zero Quantity in Stock

Hi Experts,
I am preparing a Customized Stock Summary Report.
I have two queries.
1. How do i find Materials with Zero quantity in Stock????
Is searching for MATNR based on MENGE value 'SPACE' correct way to go about it?
2. How do i find number of same materials in the same plant ?????
Points will be awarded for the helpful answers.
Cheers
Gaurav Raghav

Hi Vineet,
Thanks for the quick solution.
I got point 1.
Just confirm whether i understood it correctly.
If a search for MATNR based on Field LBAST i.e Valuated unrestricted-use stock in table MARD, i will get all materials with Quantity Zero.
Have i understood correctly????
I guess i was not clear with my second point.
let me try once more.
My selection criteria is based on Plant.
Therefore i guess same materials under PS & JS are redundant.
So i want to display SKU excluding all Deleted Materials.
How do i go about it???
I have already coded to select deleted materials.
Cheers
Gaurav Raghav

How to exclude records from infopackage

Hi All,
I am trying to exclude records based on characteristic(ZSCSF) value.I have written ABAP routine in infopackage.
    l_t_range-sign      = 'E'.
    l_t_range-option    = 'EQ'.
    l_t_range-low       = '0-3 CASE CARB MV TRB CUP'.
During scheduling of infopackage i am getting below error message.
For sel. field '/BIC/ZSCSF', no selection with SIGN = 'E'; OPTION 'EQ' allowed
i am getting error message for below code too.
    l_t_range-sign      = 'I'.
    l_t_range-option    = 'NE'.
    l_t_range-low       = '0-3 CASE CARB MV TRB CUP'.
I am only able to execute below selection.
    l_t_range-sign      = 'I'.
    l_t_range-option    = 'EQ'.
    l_t_range-low       = '0-3 CASE CARB MV TRB CUP'.
Please suugest me can we exclude records in infopackage using type 6(ABAP routine).If yes,coule you please provide code.it will be great for me..
Thanks in advance,
Bandana.

One suggestion is, you select all the options for characteristic(ZSCSF) values(if they are not many) from the source DSO.
Remove the one which you want from internal table.
And append the rest in the l_t_range table.
But the best way is, to delete the records in the start routine.
Thanks.

One-to-many selfjoin removing records with the same ranking or with a substitute

Sorry for my bad choice of discussion title, feel free to suggest me a more pertinent one
I've rewritten post for clarity and following the FAQ.
DB Version
I'm using Oracle Enterprise 10g 10.2.0.1.0 64bit
Tables involved
CREATE TABLE wrhwr (
wr_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
eq_id VARCHAR2(50) NULL,
date_completed DATE NULL,
status VARCHAR2(20) NOT NULL,
pmp_id VARCHAR2(20) NOT NULL,
description VARCHAR2(20) NULL);
Sample data
INSERT into wrhwr VALUES (1,'MI-EXT-0001',date'2013-07-16','Com','VER-EXC','Revisione')
INSERT into wrhwr VALUES (2,'MI-EXT-0001',date'2013-07-01','Com','VER-EXC','Verifica')
INSERT into wrhwr VALUES (3,'MI-EXT-0001',date'2013-06-15','Com','VER-EXC','Revisione')
INSERT into wrhwr VALUES (4,'MI-EXT-0001',date'2013-06-25','Com','VER-EXC','Verifica')
INSERT into wrhwr VALUES (5,'MI-EXT-0001',date'2013-04-14','Com','VER-EXC','Revisione')
INSERT into wrhwr VALUES (6,'MI-EXT-0001',date'2013-04-30','Com','VER-EXC','Verifica')
INSERT into wrhwr VALUES (7,'MI-EXT-0001',date'2013-03-14','Com','VER-EXC','Collaudo')
Query used
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT eq_id,
 date_completed,
 RANK ()
 OVER (PARTITION BY eq_id
 ORDER BY date_completed DESC NULLS LAST)
 rn
 FROM wrhwr
 WHERE status != 'S'
 AND pmp_id LIKE 'VER-EX%'
 AND description LIKE '%Verifica%') table1,
 (SELECT eq_id,
 date_completed,
 RANK ()
 OVER (PARTITION BY eq_id
 ORDER BY date_completed DESC NULLS LAST)
 rn
 FROM wrhwr
 WHERE status != 'S'
 AND pmp_id LIKE 'VER-EX%'
 AND description LIKE '%Revisione%') table2,
 (SELECT eq_id,
 date_completed,
 RANK ()
 OVER (PARTITION BY eq_id
 ORDER BY date_completed DESC NULLS LAST)
 rn
 FROM wrhwr
 WHERE status != 'S'
 AND pmp_id LIKE 'VER-EX%'
 AND description LIKE '%Collaudo%') table3
WHERE table1.eq_id = table3.eq_id
 AND table2.eq_id = table3.eq_id
 AND table1.eq_id = table2.eq_id
Purpose of the above query is to selfjoin wrhwr table 3 times in order to have for every row:
eq_id;
completition date of a work request of type Verifica for this eq_id (table1 alias);
completition date of a wr of type Revisione (table2 alias) for this eq_id;
completition date of a wr of type Collaudo (table3 alias) for this eq_id;
A distinct eq_id:
can have many work requests (wrhwr records) with different completition dates or without completition date (date_completed column NULL);
in a date range can have all the types of wrhwr ('Verifica', 'Revisione', 'Collaudo') or some of them (ex. Verifica, Revisione but not Collaudo, Collaudo but not Verifica and Revisione, etc.);
substrings in description shouldn't repeat;
(eq_id,date_completed) aren't unique but (eq_id,date_completed,description,pmp_id) should be unique;
Expected output
Using sample data above I expect this output:
eq_id,table1.date_completed,table2.date_completed,table3.date_completed
MI-EXT-001,2013-07-01,2013-07-16,2013-03-14 <--- for this eq_id table3 doesn't have 3 rows but only 1. I want to repeat the most ranked value of table3 for every result row
MI-EXT-001,2013-07-01,2013-06-15,2013-03-14 <-- I don't wanna this row because table1 and table2 have both 3 rows so the match must be in rank terms (1st,1st) (2nd,2nd) (3rd,3rd)
MI-EXT-001,2013-06-25,2013-06-15,2013-03-14 <-- 2nd rank of table1 joins 2nd rank of table2
MI-EXT-001,2013-04-30,2013-04-14,2013-03-14 <-- 1st rank table1, 1st rank table2, 1st rank table3
In vector style syntax, expected tuple output must be:
ix = i-th ranking of tableX
(i1, i2, i3) IF EXISTS an i-th ranking row in every table
ELSE
(i1, b, b)
where b is the first available lower ranking of table2 OR NULL if there isn't any row of lower ranking.
Any clues?
With the query I'm unable to remove "spurius" rows.
I'm thinking at a solution based on analytic functions like LAG() and LEAD(), using ROLLUP() or CUBE(), using nested query but I would find a solution elegant, easy, fast and easy to maintain.
Thanks

FrankKulash ha scritto:
About duplicate dates: I was most interested in what you wanted when 2 (or more) rows with the same eq_id and row type (e.g. 'Collaudo') had exactly the same completed_date.
In the new results, did you get the columns mixed up? It looks like the row with eq_id='MI-EXT-0002' has 'Collaudo' in the desciption, but the date appears in the verifica column of the output, not the collaudo column.
Why don't you want 'MI-EXT-0001' in the results? Is it realted to the non-unique date?
For all optimization questions, see the forum FAQ:https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362003
If you can explain what you need to do in the view (and post some sample data and output as examples) then someone might help you find a better way to do it.
It looks like there's a lot of repetition in the code. Whatever you're trying to do, I suspect there's a simpler, more efficient way to do it.
About Duplicate dates: query must show ONLY one date_completed and ignore duplicated. Those records are "bad data". You can't have 2 collaudos with the same date completed.
Collaudo stands for equipment check. A craftperson does an equipment check once a day and, with a mobile app, update the work request related to equipment and procedure of preventive maintenance, so is impossibile that complete more than one check (Collaudo) in a day, by design.
In the new results, it's my fault: during digitation I've swapped columns
With "I don't want 'MI-EXT-0001'" I mean: "I don't want to show AGAIN MI-EXT-0001. In the previous post was correct the output including MI-EXT-0001.
Regarding optimisation...
repetition of
LAST_VALUE (
 MIN (CASE WHEN r_type = THEN column_name END) IGNORE NULLS)
 OVER (PARTITION BY eq_id ORDER BY r_num) AS alias_column_name
is because I don't know another feasible way to have all columns needed of table wrhwr in main query, maintaining the correct order. So i get them in got_r_type and propagate them in all the subquery.
In main query I join eq table (which contains all the information about a specific equipment) with "correct" dates and columns of wrhwr table.
I filter eq table for the specific equipment standard (eq_std column).
efm_eq_tablet table and where clause
AND e.eq_id = e2.eq_id
 AND e2.is_active = 'S';
means: show only rows in eq table that have an equal row in efm_eq_tablet table AND are active (represented by 'S' value in is_active column).
About the tables v2, r2 and c2
 (SELECT doc_data, doc_data_rinnovo, eq_id
 FROM efm_doc_rep edr
 WHERE edr.csi_id = '1011503' AND edr.doc_validita_temp = 'LIM') v2,
 (SELECT doc_data, doc_data_rinnovo, eq_id
 FROM efm_doc_rep edr
 WHERE eq_id = edr.eq_id
 AND edr.csi_id = '1011504'
 AND edr.doc_validita_temp = 'LIM') r2,
 (SELECT doc_data, doc_data_rinnovo, eq_id
 FROM efm_doc_rep edr
 WHERE edr.csi_id IN ('1011505', '1011507')
 AND edr.doc_validita_temp = 'LIM'
 AND adempimento_ok = 'SI') c2,
Those tables contains "alternate" dates of completition to be used when there isn't any wrhwr row for an eq_id OR when all date_completed are NULL.
NVL() and NVL2() functions are used in main query in order to impletement this.
The CASE/WHEN blocks inside main query implements the behavior of selecting the correct date based of the above conditions.

How to prepare sales order quantiti with free quantity reprot?

Hi SAP Guru's,
I need to create a reprot that is based on special schemes like bye 2 get 1 free in that report client wants order quantity along with free quantity.
please help me to generate a report.
Hussain.

dear friend,
as far as i know there is no such report in standard.
so you have at least two ways:
1. build a sap query (use SQ02 and SQ01)
2. request abaper for custom report
from technical point of view i would suggest to operate with your particular 'free' item.
for example, in standrd it is AFNN item category, so run through VBAP looking for AFNN' records (VBAP-PSTYV = 'AFNN' for example) and get a quantities per position. of course, do not forget about VBAK table - you will get all important info from there, for example, the sales documnet type, date, sales area,...and you may look at VBFA (sales doc flow), KNA1 (customer) and other tables if you need some extra info.
good luck!

Related item with calculated quantity

Hello,
I have requirement like this in 11.5.10.2.
1. I have sales order with item "A" quantity 10.
2. I choose related item "B" with default quantity 1.
This is easy.
I want put my own quantity instead 1. I can change this quantity manually but I want make own calculation and I want fill in quantity by system.
What kind of setup/customization I have to make? Has somebody had requirement like this?
Regards,
Luko

Luko,
I think the standard functionality is always going to give you a quantity of 1 as default.
Have you tried using a personalization on the LINE object, WHEN-VALIDATE-RECORD event, with a condition statement restricting the trigger to the item relationship type(s) you're using?
If your requirement is as simple as always setting the related item quantity to be the same as the ordered item quantity then you should be able to take care of that within the perso. If you have variable qty relationships, you'd have to look at storing those in the Item Relationships DFF and referencing that setup from your perso to get the correct calculated qty value to set.
Regards,
Jon

Exclude records in a parameter selection

Post Author: bilbo
CA Forum: General
Hi,
Is it possible to exclude records from a parameter selection field? Part of my record selection is: "NOT ({TABLE1.FIELD1} IN {?Exclude})" but my Exclude parameter obviously returns every record. Users need this to exclude multiple selections. Can I limit what is returned by adding a WHERE clause like "NOT ({TABLE1.FIELD1} IN {?Exclude}) WHERE {TABLE1.FIELD2} = 'Car parts' Obviously not what I've just put as this don't work!?!
I don't really want to manually set the default selections as there is a huge number to contend with.
Any help or pointers greatly appreciated!
Bill

Post Author: SKodidine
CA Forum: General
Your NOT condition seems to be fine (at least in CR XI). You said it is 'part' of the select. Could it be that the rest of the selection criteria be causing issues? Also, is your parameter set up to accept multiple values?

Filtering records with deletion flag in Query report

Dear Friends,
We are using ECC6.00 (EHP4) for one of our QM requirement, i have created a query in SQ01 with the tables QMEL,AUFK,AFKO,QMFE etc., to get the details of production order and notification.
The report will list out the production scheduler wise, order wise, defect wise quantity with the notification number also in the display.
For notifications which are created wrongly, the users set deletion flag. The same i.e., notifications with deletion flag should not appear in the report and hence i have called the field and filtered the value in the output (i.e., field value not equal to X where X is for deletion flag set records).
Everything works fine upto this, but when users (to carry out analysis) send the data to the spread sheet, the filter values are removed and all records are populated in the excel sheet (even records with deletion flag).
To select and display only records without deletion flag, i want to introduce coding in the query. Kindly tell me whether this is possible, if so where and what code should be written to meet my requirement.
The records with the deletion flag (notifications) should be eliminated from the selection and display.
Experts help required.
Regards,
M.M

Dear Raymond Giuseppi,
Thank you for your reply. The code syntax had been corrected based on your information. Unfortunately the code doesn't filter the records. On further investigation , it was observed that the field KZLOESCH doesn't get updated and hence a field had been created in the infoset wherein the following coding is written
clear : w_dlfl.
data : w_inact type char1.
select single inact into w_inact from jest
where objnr = qmel-objnr
and stat = 'I0076'
and inact ne 'X'.
if sy-subrc = 0 .
w_dlfl = 'X'.
else.
w_dlfl = ''.
endif.
The field name is W_dlfl.
In the above condition how and where should i include the code given by you. Since the field KZLOESCH is not updated how should we get the data from the field w_dlfl be exempted from selection?
Kindly provide solution.
Regards,
M.M

Two records with same key (Infocube)

Hi,
I was trying to do, in a update rule, an "IF" condition with two key figures.
IF Kf1 > Kf2. result = Kf1 else result = Kf2.
But the data in the source (datamart Infocube to infocube) have tow records with the same characteristics combination (the same keys)and different amount in the keyfigures, then the result of my "if" condition is not the expected because I understood in the infocube only exists one characteristics combination. :S
I was seeing those records in the manage transaction of the infocube.
Some reason for this?
Thanks and regards
Victoria Leó

This can happen with parallel loads. Two rows with same set of Char values but in different packets of the same Request, being loaded at the same time.
It really shouldn't be an issue - your update rule will make the KF change as desired. Your queries aggregate KFs based characteristic values, not Dim IDs, so you'll get the totals you expect.
Here's some more info:
There is an RSRV Test that lets you check a dimension for a cube to see if multiple DIM IDs exist for the same combination of Chars - Multiple Entries in Dimensions of a (Basis) InfoCube
Output looks like:
12:02:24 o'clock on 08/25/2006: Start test run for user PIZZAMAN:)
Dimension ZFM_C521: DIMID 61,215 and 61,214 have same characteristic values
Dimension ZFM_C521: DIMID 61,880 and 61,879 have same characteristic values
Dimension ZFM_C521: DIMID 61,366 and 61,365 have same characteristic values
Dimension ZFM_C521: DIMID 61,368 and 61,367 have same characteristic values
12:02:24 on 08/25/2006: Test run for user PIZZAMAN:) completed
You can run the Correct Error option to have it update fact rows to use one of the DimIDs if you want, but unless you have lots of them, I even wouldn't bother.
Here's the description of the test:
Description
This elementary test recognizes whether there are several lines that have different DIMIDs(dimension table key), but have the same SIDs for the selected dimension table for the InfoCube specified. (This can occur by using parallel loading jobs). This has nothing to do with an inconsistency. However, unnecessary storage space is occupied in the database.
Repairs
Since the different DIMIDs with the same SIDs are normally used in the fact tables, they cannot simply be deleted. Therefore, all of the different DIMIDS in the fact tables are replaced by one DIMID that is randomly selected from the equivalent ones. Before a change can be made to the database, the consent of the user is requested.
DIMIDs that have become unnecessary are deleted in the connection. In doing so, not only are the DIMDs deleted that were released in the first part of the repair, but so are all of those that are no longer used in the fact tables (including aggregates). The consent of the user is again requested before this change is made.

Records with duplicate key in Infospoke

Hello
I have a question with regard to the output produced by a Delta Extraction Mode infospoke.
I have an Infospoke running across a single cube that pulls a number of characteristics and key figures from said cube. The infospoke uses delta extraction and is run as part of a process chain after the successful update of the said infocube.
The output file contains two records for each record that exists in the cube .....
The first record contains all the characteristics and the correct values for the key figures - this record corresponds with the associated record in the cube.
The second record contains all the characteristics as the previous record but, all the key figures contain '0' values.
The two records in the infospoke output file are always sequential. Every valid record (ie record I would expect to see) has a duplicate with '0' value key figures.
Has anyone experienced this? As the key figure values for the output always correspond when totalled I am not too concerned at this stage but just wondered if anyone has seen this before.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Sally

Hi Sally,
Info spoke first extract data from F fact table and then from E fact table. If you are extracting data into an table you can choose request id and package id as key on top of characteristics. But when you are extracting data into flat file you cant. so you will get multiple records.
Try to extract the data into a table and check the difference. If you have same characteristic combination records available in E & F fact table you will get 2 records in 2 different request nos(Check in the Open Hub Monitor).
For more information see the how to papers on open hub...
https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/bi
right side "Info Index".
seach for the papers
· BW 3.0B Open Hub - Positioning (zip)
· BW Open Hub (ppt)
· BW Open Hub - Transcript (doc)
· BW Open Hub Service - Update (zip)
Hope this Helps
Srini

Excluding records with 0 quantity in cube 0SD_C15

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for