Excluding the wages from Infotype 2010

Hello there!
I want to Payroll schema to exclude the information stored in Infotype 2010 or Table P2010 (however you would like to consider it).
Please let me know where do you add or remove such validation. I could find for 14 and 15 but unsure of where is 2010.
You can give me direct PCR/Schema or a path such as:
XT00 -> XAP9 -> P0015 Disable the line with P0015 to exclude all Additional Payments in Payroll Processing.
Thanks
Yash

Friends
As I check the US Schema, I see the 2010 is processed in subschema UT00.
U000 -> UT00 -> P2010
If I disable the same line with * all the wages stored in 2010 should not be processed by schema. I don't have the development server or test server ready yet so cannot say for sure. Can someone please confirm me if I am going right?
Thanks
Yash

Similar Messages

  • To move the wagetypes from infotype pa0008 subtype 11 to subtype 0.

    Hi all,
    I have a requirement wherin i have a need to copy the wagetypes from infotype pa0008 subtype 11 to pa0008 subtype 0 based on the begin date i.e., if if the begda of subtype 11 is greater than begda of subtype 0 it has to be copied. This has to be run on a monthly process. Can anyone provide me a sample code or tips about how to do this without using dynamic actions.
    Regards,
    Shiji

    Hi
    Usually the entire set of content management scenario like wf's , metadata , expiration etc are created on UCM Server . On the URM side all the life cycles like Retention , Disposition , Records actions etc are created .
    So when you checkin a content and if it is attached to a category / record folders then it will be searchable from URM side as well .
    As for moving the contents you can schedule the Synchronization on a manual basis from UCM side where in the contents will then be searchable from URM side .
    All the contents , metadata and such details will be on UCM itself but they will be attached to the URM life cycles .
    Apart from this if you want then the same ucm server can be turned into a standalone RM server as well by selecting Standalone Option while enabling RM components .
    Or else use the Adapter configuration to have UCM server with RM communicate with a full blown URM server .
    Thanks
    Srinath

  • Excluding the index from the page numbers

    Hi,
    is it possible to exclude the index from the page numbers? My index is 5 pages long and I want the first page of the first chapter to start at page 1, not on page 6.
    Any hint? Anything to do with sections?
    Thanks!

    Solved, thanks to this topic:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2046762&tstart=0

  • Moving the CMS from Lync 2010 to Lync 2013

    Now that all our users have been migrated to Lync 2013, I need to move the CMS from 2010 to 2013. Using the following MS article:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj688013.aspx
    Nothing is mentioned about the mirrored database. What about that? I found the article below on creating a mirrored database
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj204986.aspx
    But at what point do you do this? Should this be done at the same time you run the install-csdatabase to move the CMS or do you wait until everything is complete including the removal of the old 2010 database and then create the mirrored database?

    Hi,
    Agree with Georg, you can even add a SQL mirror to an existing Lync server 2013 Back End.
    You can refer to the link below:
    http://howdouc.blogspot.in/2012/08/adding-sql-mirror-to-existing-lync.html
    Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please make
    sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
    Best Regards,
    Eason Huang
    Eason Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Excluding the asset from depreciation

    Hi,
    We are trying to run restart run, from AFAB . One perticular auc asset is ending in an error, that account for unplanned depreciation is missing.
    "Account 'Accumulated dep. account unpl. deprec.' could not be found for area 01"
    Now some how, this asset had unplanned depreciation postings, which we reversed in AB08.
    After that below are the asset values.
    But the restart run in 2013 period 11, still ends in the above error.
    Please let me know how this can be solved. Can the asset be excluded from depreciation?
    Regards
    SR

    Hi,
    Depreciation is posted for all the assets at a same time. You cannot ignore or post only for a single Asset. Now here in your case its showing that unplanned depreciation is posted in period 11 whereas its reversed in period 12. So I thin kif you execute AFAB for period 12, for Fiscal Year 2013 in planned values, then system will post the values in the assets and the Asset values will be nil. I think that you have reversed the Document through AB08 in 12th period.
    Regards,
    Malhar.

  • Availability Chk at Plnt level excluding the stk from some storage locatn

    Hello Gurus,
    I want to configure availability check at Plant Level which should exclude stock from few storage location. Example: if Plant 1000 is having 20 Storage location, at the time of availability Check it should consider only stock of 15 storage location and not the other 5 storage location.
    How do i achieve this scenario.
    Note: the 5 storage location which it should not consider can have unrestricted stock.
    Thanks
    Prashant Ranalkar

    >
    Prashant Ranalkar wrote:
    > Hello Gurus,
    >
    > I want to configure availability check at Plant Level which should exclude stock from few storage location. Example: if Plant 1000 is having 20 Storage location, at the time of availability Check it should consider only stock of 15 storage location and not the other 5 storage location.
    > How do i achieve this scenario.
    > Note: the 5 storage location which it should not consider can have unrestricted stock.
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > Prashant Ranalkar
    Hi Prashant,
    You could check this on "Availability Check Control " screen,
    There is a chack box to select " Storage location", This indicator is used to set the scope of the availability check. It is used to switch off the check at storage location level.
    Hope this will help you for further analysis.
    SAN..

  • How to exclude the stock from MRP in MS04.

    Hi SAP ALL,
                 My client req the stock maintain the for the long term planning purpose under one storage location stock not considered to the MRP. in MS04 T Code.this is issue where did i m setting plz give some detailed explanation
    regards
    raju

    Hi,
    In transaction OMIR, choose your plant & then for the storage location you want to exclude from MRP enter 1 (exclude from MRP).
    After this setting is maintained, whenever a material is created in this plant & storage location, it will have MRP indicator as "1" in the mrp 4 view .
    For materials already in this storage location if the MRP indicator "1" is not maintained in mrp 4 view, please go for a mass change maintenance in the material master & maintain this indicator.
    Stock in the excluded storage location will not add up to the stock which is displayed in the top in the md04 screen. This stock will be displayed separately in the bottom of the screen.
    Please check same with MS04.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • How to exclude the data from the query ?

    Hi all,
    I got the following sql script :-
    SELECT OS.SL_DT, OS.sl_item_code, OS.SL_REF, (OS.sl_val_1) recp,B.CGCV_VALUE_1
    FROM OS_STK_LEDGER OS, ( SELECT cgcv_item_code, CGCV_STK_QTY_BU, CGCV_COST_1, CGCV_VALUE_1
                             FROM OS_COST_GROUP_CURR_VAL
                             WHERE CGCV_COST_GROUP_CODE = 'ACOSG'
                             AND CGCV_GRADE_CODE_1 = 'G1' ) B
    WHERE OS.sl_dt <= TO_DATE('31/05/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy')
    AND OS.sl_rcvd_issd = 'R'
    AND (OS.sl_txn_code = 'SGRN' OR OS.sl_txn_code = 'PGRN' OR OS.SL_TXN_CODE = 'SAOP' )
    --AND (os.SL_REF LIKE 'CRE%' OR os.SL_REF LIKE 'UT%' OR os.SL_REF LIKE 'MAR%' OR os.SL_REF IS NULL )
    AND B.CGCV_ITEM_CODE(+) = OS.SL_ITEM_CODE
    AND OS.SL_COST_GROUP_CODE(+) = 'ACOSG'
    AND sl_grade_code_1 = 'G1'
    order by sl_item_code, sl_dt
    The following output will be :-
    Date_______Item__Code________V1___V2
    01/01/2012_AAA___CRE1005____100___200
    02/02/2012_AAA___ABC1005_____50____200
    02/03/2012_AAA___CRE1005_____90____200
    01/03/2012_BBB___ABC1005_____50____1000
    04/04/2012_BBB___ABC1005_____12____1000
    From the output, when group by item & code, I am actual needs only Code with CRE1005, but for item : AAA group, I cannot delete code of ABC1005 because it consists of code with CRE%. For item : BBB, where Code not like CRE% then the two records actually I don't need to select in my SQL.
    Can anyone help me to think about ways of solving this issue ?
    Thanks.
    Lim

    with t
    as
    select to_date('01/01/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'CRE1005' code, 100 v1, 200 v2 from dual
    union all
    select to_date('02/02/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'ABC1005' code, 50  v1, 200 v2 from dual
    union all
    select to_date('02/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'CRE1005' code, 90  v1, 200 v2 from dual
    union all
    select to_date('01/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'BBB' item, 'ABC1005' code, 50  v1, 1000 v2 from dual
    union all
    select to_date('04/04/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'BBB' item, 'ABC1005' code, 12  v1, 1000 v2 from dual
    -- Output sample ends.
    -- Original select begins
    select t1.dt, t1.item, t1.code, v1, sum_v1, v2
    from t t1,
            select item, code, sum(v1) sum_v1
            from t
            group by item, code
            ) t2
    where t1.item =t2.item
        and t1.code = t2.code;
    DT       ITEM CODE            V1     SUM_V1         V2
    01.01.RR AAA  CRE1005        100        190        200
    02.02.RR AAA  ABC1005         50         50        200
    03.02.RR AAA  CRE1005         90        190        200
    03.01.RR BBB  ABC1005         50         62       1000
    04.04.RR BBB  ABC1005         12         62       1000
    5 rows selected.
    with t
    as
    select to_date('01/01/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'CRE1005' code, 100 v1, 200 v2 from dual
    union all
    select to_date('02/02/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'ABC1005' code, 50  v1, 200 v2 from dual
    union all
    select to_date('02/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'CRE1005' code, 90  v1, 200 v2 from dual
    union all
    select to_date('01/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'BBB' item, 'ABC1005' code, 50  v1, 1000 v2 from dual
    union all
    select to_date('04/04/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'BBB' item, 'ABC1005' code, 12  v1, 1000 v2 from dual
    -- Output sample ends.
    -- Original select begins
    select t1.dt, t1.item, t1.code, v1, sum_v1, v2
    from t t1,
            select item, code, sum(v1) sum_v1
            from t a
            where exists
                    select 1
                    from t b
                    where code like 'CRE%'
                        and a.item = b.item
            group by item, code
            ) t2
    where t1.item =t2.item
        and t1.code = t2.code;
    DT       ITEM CODE            V1     SUM_V1         V2
    01.01.RR AAA  CRE1005        100        190        200
    02.02.RR AAA  ABC1005         50         50        200
    03.02.RR AAA  CRE1005         90        190        200
    3 rows selected.

  • How to suppress compiler errors without excluding database objects from the "Schema Compare" tool (using VS2013/SSDT)

    Hi,
    In short: How to suppress compiler errors without excluding the object from the "Schema Compare" tool ??
    A bit longer:
    We have a SQL Server 2008 project in Visual Studio 2013 running SQL Server Data Tool.
    An old database, with a lot of history in, has been imported into SSDT and there are many syntax errors preventing the project from compiling/running. An typical error is: "SQL70001: This statement is not recognized in this context".
    Running the "faulty" scripts on the server, executes just fine. I understand that there are syntax errors and they should be rewritten, but it's not gonna happen just like that - it is a slow process over a long period of time.
    I know it is possible to change Build Action to None, but that also exclude the object from appearing in the Schema Compare function/window.
    So - how to ignore some compiler errors and still having the objects to appear when doing "Schema Compare" ??
    Thank you in advance.

    Hi Steven,
    Thanks for your comments.
    Well, it sure does help in the future, but right now i would prefer the other way - to suppress some errors and still allow the scripts to build.
    The thing is that if we "rewrite" the objects into create scripts, then we have a huge test job ahead of us + the database environments (PROD vs DEV and UAT) does not share the same AD or DB users and therefore grants is lost if dropping/creating
    objects, right!
    If you drop a object before creating it, the drop will also drop the roles and grants and since they don't share user table, the create will not be able to add the permissions again. There might be a solution to that, but it is going to be very complicated
    for some newbies like us. We need something we can trust.
    BR
    Peter

  • RFC to get the data from HR Infotypes

    Hi,
    We have a requirement to get the data from infotypes for a particular personnel number. Can anybody tell me the RFC for extracting the data from the infotypes?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Shaikh,
    Here are few more which got missed out:-
    BAPI_EMPLCOMM_GETDETAIL - Communication infotype - infotype 0105
    BAPI_INTCONTROL_GETDETAIL - Internal cont - infotype 32
    BAPI_PDOTYPES_GETDETAILEDLIST - PD infotypes
    BAPI_ABSENCE_GETDETAIL   - infotype 2001
    BAPI_W4W5INFOUS_GETDETAIL - W4/W5 info of an emp - infotype 210
    BAPI_DATESPECS_GETDETAILEDLIST - Date specifications -infotype  41
    RFC_ABSENCETYPES_READ - RFC which Lists absence types
    HR_BEN_READ_CREDIT_PLANS - RFC for reading credit plans
    HR_BEN_READ_INSURE_PLANS - RFC for reading insurance plans.
    HR_BEN_READ_HEALTH_PLANS_RFC     RFC for Reading Health plans
    Hope this helps.
    Kindly reward if useful.
    Regards & Thanks,
    Darshan Mulmule

  • How to Unlock a Locked Recoed for Infotype 2010..

    Dear Expert,
    How can I unlock a locked record from Infotype 2010. When I am using BDC how should I decide which record to select in PA30 once I have passed the date and Employee Number details on the screen.
    If on the same date if there are more than one record and if the first one is not locked then the BDC is locking them insted of unlocking it.
    Is there any function module which can help me. The Code I have used is as below.
    The field SPRPS is coming during recording but bdc gives error stating this field is not there on the screen so could not use this one as well..
    IF T_REPORT-INFOTYPE = '2010'.
              PERFORM BDC_DYNPRO USING 'SAPMP50A' '1000'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '=LIST'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50G-PERNR' T_REPORT-PERNR.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50G-TIMR6' 'X'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50G-BEGDA' TEMP_BEGDA.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50G-ENDDA' TEMP_BEGDA.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50G-CHOIC' '2010'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50G-SUBTY' T_REPORT-LGART.
             PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'P50G-SPRPS' 'X'.
              PERFORM BDC_DYNPRO USING 'MP200000' '3450'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'BDC_CURSOR' 'P2010-BEGDA(01)'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '=EDQ'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50M-BEGDA' TEMP_BEGDA.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50M-ENDDA' TEMP_BEGDA.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50M-PAGEA' ' 1'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'RP50M-SELE2(01)' 'X'.
              PERFORM BDC_DYNPRO USING 'MP200000' '2450'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
              PERFORM BDC_DYNPRO USING 'MP200000' '2450'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'BDC_CURSOR' 'P2010-LGART'.
              PERFORM BDC_FIELD  USING 'BDC_OKCODE' 'UPD'.
    Unlock the Details to the R/3 using Tcode PA30.
              CALL TRANSACTION 'PA30' USING BDCDATA MODE 'P' MESSAGES INTO MESSTAB.
    Regards,
    Vidya..

    first of all, use a BAPI instead of BDC.. HR_MAINTAIN_MASTERDATA
    you may have to do some up-front logic to determine which records to unlock, if necessary.
    EDIT: that is a FM, not BAPI.
    Edited by: robert phelan on Mar 16, 2009 8:57 PM

  • Exclude the value 0 records in the pivot view obiee 10g

    HI,
    I have a requirement.,i have report circuit and outage time by month in a pivot view.If one circuit have a '0' outage time in all months then i want to exclude the record from the display.Is there anyway to display the data like this....
    thanks,
    prassu

    circuit   April may jun
       1          0   0     10   
       2         0     0     0
       3         0     4    1
    my question is  for circuit 2 all months we have outage 0.so i want to exclude the record , if we select Quarter 2.
    And  exclude 3 if we  select April....etc

  • 3138 SQL error opening sqlite db file from Outlook 2010 as attachment

    Has anyone of you tried sending the sqlite db file thru e-mail and then open the file from Outlook 2010?
    I have an air app that can be opened by doubleclicking the sqlite database file (invoke event). The file is sent via e-mail from the app itself, so another user can run the app directly from their e-mail client once he receives the db. Now everything works fine unless you use Outlook 2010 - when I open it I get an sql error 3138 - do you know what can be the problem? Everything is fine when I'm using different e-mail client (the same e-mail account, just other client) like Outlook 2003 or Thunderbird or Opera. I'm guessing Outlook 2010 is using some kind of protection to attachments that is making the file not understandable by the app, but Microsoft seems to ignore my e-mails sent to them with the same question. The db file is not encrypted if that changes anything and saving the file from outlook to desktop and then running does not help. When I do the same using Outlook 2003 everything works as it should, but unfortunatelly my customer upgraded to 2010 :/ Any ideas would be much appreciated.

    This looks like a new behavior of Outlook 2010 and isn't specific to PDFs. You will need to "save as" the document. There is a thread at Microsoft forums about this with some possible workarounds:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/outlook/thread/927d678d-b55b-4732-93cb-f1 3ed1dacf96/

  • Appointments from Exchange 2010 show as Mail in Mailbox

    I have a very frustrating issue with a single user on one of our post offices. For reasons unknown appointments sent to the user from Exchange 2010 appear as mail items instead of appointments within the mailbox. Other users on the same post office do not get the same issue. I have tried resetting the user's views and a full client reset via maintenance. I have set the user's client settings to be the same as another user who does not get the issue without any luck either. Maintenance checks on the account does not flag any errors. I'm pretty certain I'm missing something very simple, but alas I can not think what.
    Software wise we're running client 8.0.1 on post office agent version 8.0.2. We seem to get the same results regardless of the Client version of outlook, (we have tried the web version and 2003 and 2010 of the client). Anything else I could try would be greatly appreciated.
    Kind Regards
    Rob

    In article <[email protected]>, Rob naylor
    wrote:
    > Software wise we're running client 8.0.1 on post office agent version
    > 8.0.2.
    >
    How about updating those as they are a bit old.
    Try looking at that user's account from another machine and from
    WebAccess (if installed).
    It is good to separate the PC from the user account as sometimes an odd
    problem can be from some funky issue on the PC.
    I'm not surprised that different versions of the Exchange 2010 client
    doesn't make a difference as there is the formatting is set when
    Exchange formats the outgoing to the internet.
    A thought there, is your user setup as a contact on the Exchange
    system, there have been settings in the past that caused invalid
    formatting of internet messages. Something to the effect that 'this
    user is on OutLook/Exchange vs regular internet standards'.
    Has there been a single appointment sent from a user on that Exchange
    system to two of your users?
    Andy Konecny
    Konecny Consulting Inc. in Toronto
    "Give more than others think is wise
    Challenge yourself beyond what others think is right"
    Michael 'Pinball' Clemens

  • F110 - Exclude Credit Memos from original Invoice

    Good afternoon,
    Our go live was 1 month ago.
    We have prepared automatic payment process and everything works perfectly. Mainly, we base our process in the Payment Method Supplement field. Some payment methods group documents following different rules (restricted to 7 rows or as many as request).
    Our problem is that our customer does not want credit memos to be included never there (payment terms are taken from original invoice and when they pay the invoice, this credit is included). They want to identify ALWAYS what they are paying fulfilling the Payment Method Supplement field.
    Is there any chance not include the credit memo in these payments? For example, not copying Payment Method Supplement from the original invoice? any other idea? Please let me know. Regards,
    Javier

    Hi Renfe Proyecto Auge ,
    You can exclude Credit memos in Additional Fields there you have to select Excluded and from hidden field select document radio button and from the list select Document Type (BKPF-BLART),
    after this you have to choose Document type credit memo what ever you maintained for Credit memo, accordingly system will exclude the values from Automatic Payment Run.
    Regards
    Sridhar

Maybe you are looking for