Expanded data in Advanced Search for UI

Hi Gurus,
what I wonder to know if where I can remove/change fields which compare if I click on the triangle on the left side of a promotion ID in the Advanced Search Result view.
At the present moment if I click on it I can see three sets of data: one for product of the Trade Promotion, one for Casual Product and the last one for Trade Spend.
If, for example, I want to delete the row for trade spend, how can I do it?
Full of point for an helpful answer!...
Thanks a lot,
best regards,
A.

Hi Carsten,
I will try to explain it better.
So when I search a Trade Promotion I have a little tringle on the left of the link to the Trade Promotion and clicking on it I can see the three objects I told you. I also had a look to the correspond context node and I found in the context node ADVANCEDSEARCHRESULT for TPMOE component the method GET_SUB_CNODE_DEFINITIONS the three calls to the three objects.
Is it the right path?
If I would like to hide one of them I should work in this method?
Thanks a lot,
best regards,
A.

Similar Messages

Find Label Missing in Advanced Search For Specific User

for specifi users FIND label is showing but some of the users in advanced search this find label is missing . top of the applictaion it is there
plz let me know why this is problem is coming
find button should visible to all users......................
give me repaly ASAP

Hi
CRM 5.0
its not related to application,modification ..but my problem is the find label is working for some of the users.but some of the users find label is not there,
plz let me know where i have to make corrections for this problem........

Unable to turn on Advanced Search for viewing PDFs (v9.1) through IE7

Our company is currently using Acrobat 9.1 and Internet Explorer 7.
We have multiple PDF document sets set up to be searched using index files. The Index feature can only be accessed using the Advanced Search option of Acrobat Reader or Pro 9.1.
When we access the documents via our internal network, the advanced searching works fine. We can easily set the user's Acrobat Reader (or Writer) to have the Advanced Search option enabled.
However, if our users try to access these documents via our company's intranet web pages, the Acrobat Reader Interface plug-in (acropdf.dll?) of IE7 is fixed to only use the Basic Search option. Users are only able to search the active PDF. I have not found a way to enable the the Advanced Search option using the Adobe / IE7 interface.
Not that long ago, we thought this option was available.
Is there a way to turn this feature on or at least allow it to be enabled?
Thanks Much!

Hello,
This may be of interest to anyone whose had the Advanced Search Problem (or the mis-linking problem mentioned below) using the current Acrobat Plugin to IE7.
I think I have found a workaround for this problem (and another we've found). I've been having users test this out over the past couple of weeks and it's working fine.
Problem #1
Being unable to use index searching across multiple documents with the Acrobat Reader 9.1 plug-in interface running from within Internet Explorer version 7.0.    This current plug-in interface disallows setting up the Advanced Index Search feature that groups within our company use.
Problem #2
Links in PDF A are not properly linking to desired pages (link targets) in PDF B. Any links in PDF A will only take the user to Page 1 of PDF B. This occurs when any PDF links to a certain page (other than page 1) in another targeted PDF.
Solution:
Set the user's (many users in my case) Acrobat Reader (or Pro) to only open web based PDFs into the stand-alone Acrobat interface using the Accessibility Setup Assistant.
In Adobe Reader:
     Go to Document | Accessibility Setup Assistant.
     Advance through the dialogs to Screen 5 of 5.
     Turn OFF the feature Display PDF documents in web browser.
     Select Done.
     Exit Adobe reader.
In Adobe Acrobat Pro:
     Go to Advanced | Accessibility | Setup Assistant ...
     Advance through the dialogs to Screen 5 of 5.
     Turn OFF the feature Display PDF documents in web browser.
     Select Done.
Result:
Any PDFs embedded in a web page (environment) will open up in a new session of Acrobat (Reader or Pro) on the users desktop.
Searching via indexes works great and there are no linking problems between PDFs.
It may not be an optimal solution, but is working fine for our folks that access our files via our company's intranet.
The only drawback I see is that you lose focus of the IE7 session and have to work outside of it's containment. Although it is easy to set it back to the way it worked previously.
If anyone has any questions or comments, please let me know. I'm open to any improvements we can make to our process.
Thanks!
Dave

Advanced search for a price range while checking for an empty values using php in DW

I am creating an advanced search with DW php. I would like to submit a search where some entrys can be left black. So checking for empty values (which I have managed, thank you David Powel), however when searching between multiple price ranges does not seem to work.
please see attached forms:
The search page:
<form action="Detailed-Search-Result.php" method="get" target="_self"><table width="90%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tr>
    <td colspan="2"><label for="Detailed Search">Advanced Search</label></td>
    </tr><tr>
    <td><label for="Product">Product:</label>
      </td>
    <td><select name="Category" id="Category">
      <option value=></option>
        <option value="Keyboard">Keyboard</option>
        <option value="Piano">Piano</option>
      </select></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td><label for="Make">Make:</label>
    </td>
    <td><select name="Manufacturer">
      <option value=></option>
      <option value="Boss">Boss</option>
      <option value="Casio">Casio</option>
      <option value="Kawai">Kawai</option>
      <option value="Ketron">Ketron</option>
      <option value="Korg">Korg</option>
      <option value="Roland">Roland</option>
      <option value="Samson">Samson</option>
      <option value="Yamaha">Yamaha</option>
    </select></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td><label for="Color">Color:</label></td>
    <td><select name="Color">
      <option value=></option>
      <option value="Black">Black</option>
      <option value="Cherry">Cherry</option>
      <option value="Mahogany">Mahogany</option>
      <option value="Polished Eboney">Polished Eboney</option>
      <option value="Rosewood">Rosewood</option>
      <option value="White">White</option>
      <option value="Red">Red</option>
    </select></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td><label for="Price">Price:</label></td>
    <td><select name="Price">
      <option value=></option>
      <option value="0-500">£0-500</option>
      <option value="500-1000">£500-1000</option>
      <option value="1000-2000">£1000-2000</option>
      <option value="2000">£2000></option>
    </select></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td colspan="2">
      <input name="Search2" type="submit" id="Search2"></td>
    </tr>
    </table>
</form>
The results page
$varCategory_rsgetsearch2 = "%";
if (isset($_GET['Category'])) {
$varCategory_rsgetsearch2 = $_GET['Category'];
$varMake_rsgetsearch2 = "%";
if (isset($_GET['Manufacturer'])) {
$varMake_rsgetsearch2 = $_GET['Manufacturer'];
$varColor_rsgetsearch2 = "%";
if (isset($_GET['Color'])) {
$varColor_rsgetsearch2 = $_GET['Color'];
$varPrice_rsgetsearch2 = "%";
if (isset($_GET['Price'])) {
$varPrice_rsgetsearch2 = $_GET['Price'];
mysql_select_db($database_dBconn, $dBconn);
$query_rsgetsearch2 = 'SELECT * FROM products';
$where = false;
if (isset($_GET['Category']) && !empty($_GET['Category'])) {
$query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' WHERE Category LIKE varCategory '. GetSQLValueString($_GET['Category'], 'text');
$where = true;
if (isset($_GET['Manufacturer']) && !empty($_GET['Manufacturer'])) {
if ($where) {
   $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' AND ';
} else {
   $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' WHERE ';
    $where = true;
$query_rsgetsearch2 .= 'Manufacturer LIKE varManufacturer ' . GetSQLValueString($_GET['Manufacturer'], 'text');
if (isset($_GET['Color']) && !empty($_GET['Color'])) {
    if ($where) {
   $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' AND ';
} else {
   $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' WHERE ';
    $where = true;
$query_rsgetsearch2 .= 'Color LIKE varColor ' . GetSQLValueString($_GET['Color'], 'text');
if (isset($_GET['Price']) && !empty($_GET['Price'])) {
    if ($where) {
   $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' AND ';
} else {
   $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' WHERE ';
    $where = true;
switch( $_GET['Price'] ){
        case '0-500':
        $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' RRP BETWEEN 0 AND 500 ORDER BY price ASC'. GetSQLValueString($_GET['Price'], 'text');
        break;
          case '500-1000':
        $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' RRP BETWEEN 500 AND 1000 ORDER BY price ASC'. GetSQLValueString($_GET['Price'], 'text');
        break;
                    case '1000-2000':
        $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' RRP BETWEEN 1000 AND 2000 ORDER BY price ASC'. GetSQLValueString($_GET['Price'], 'text');
        break;
          case '2000':
       $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' RRP BETWEEN 2000 AND 10000 ORDER BY price ASC'. GetSQLValueString($_GET['Price'], 'text');
        break;
$query_rsgetsearch2 = sprintf("SELECT * FROM products WHERE Category LIKE %s AND products.Manufacturer LIKE %s AND products.Color LIKE %s", GetSQLValueString("%" . $varCategory_rsgetsearch2 . "%", "text"),GetSQLValueString("%" . $varMake_rsgetsearch2 . "%", "text"),GetSQLValueString("%" . $varColor_rsgetsearch2 . "%", "text"));
$query_limit_rsgetsearch2 = sprintf("%s LIMIT %d, %d", $query_rsgetsearch2, $startRow_rsgetsearch2, $maxRows_rsgetsearch2);
$rsgetsearch2 = mysql_query($query_limit_rsgetsearch2, $dBconn) or die(mysql_error());
$row_rsgetsearch2 = mysql_fetch_assoc($rsgetsearch2);
I would be greatfull for any help

I have managed to solve the problem.
In the end I didn't check if the values were empty, as it worked fine without. However the switch of the price didn't work in combination with the rest of the query.
I've solved the problem as follows:
$varCategory_rsgetsearch2 = "%";
if (isset($_GET['Category'])) {
$varCategory_rsgetsearch2 = $_GET['Category'];
$varMake_rsgetsearch2 = "%";
if (isset($_GET['Manufacturer'])) {
$varMake_rsgetsearch2 = $_GET['Manufacturer'];
$varColor_rsgetsearch2 = "%";
if (isset($_GET['Color'])) {
$varColor_rsgetsearch2 = $_GET['Color'];
$varPrice_rsgetsearch2 = "%";
if (isset($_GET['Keysound_price'])) {
$varPrice_rsgetsearch2 = $_GET['price'];
mysql_select_db($database_dBconn, $dBconn);
$query_rsgetsearch2 = sprintf("SELECT * FROM products WHERE Category LIKE %s AND products.Manufacturer LIKE %s AND products.Color LIKE %s", GetSQLValueString("%" . $varCategory_rsgetsearch2 . "%", "text"),GetSQLValueString("%" . $varMake_rsgetsearch2 . "%", "text"),GetSQLValueString("%" . $varColor_rsgetsearch2 . "%", "text") );
switch( $_GET['price'] ){
        case '0-500':
        $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' AND price BETWEEN 0 AND 500 ORDER BY price ASC';
        break;
          case '500-1000':
        $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' AND price BETWEEN 500 AND 1000 ORDER BYprice ASC';
        break;
                    case '1000-2000':
        $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' AND price BETWEEN 1000 AND 2000 ORDER BY price ASC';
        break;
          case '2000':
        $query_rsgetsearch2 .= ' AND price BETWEEN 2000 AND 10000 ORDER BY price ASC';
        break;
$query_limit_rsgetsearch2 = sprintf("%s LIMIT %d, %d", $query_rsgetsearch2, $startRow_rsgetsearch2, $maxRows_rsgetsearch2);
$rsgetsearch2 = mysql_query($query_limit_rsgetsearch2, $dBconn) or die(mysql_error());
$row_rsgetsearch2 = mysql_fetch_assoc($rsgetsearch2);
I'm sure that you can keep the checking for values in, however for me the was no need for it anymore.
Thanks for all your help

Relative dates in advanced search / snapshot queries

Hi -
Is there any way to search with a relative date in PT 5.x? EX: "Find me content published in the last week"
We have over 700 publications that make use of relative date searches in PT 4.5 WS. I understand that these should be converted to separate snapshot queries in 5.x, but as I look at things I realize there does not seem to be a way to query by relative date - I seem to need fixed, specific dates ("between October 1 and October 7"). We realy heavily on this kind of logic in order to keep our content fresh with no ongoing maintenance.
Anyone have any suggestions? Are we missing something obvious?
Thanks,
Eric

Hi.
You can do this:
1.- Replace the controller class (MAC) for the corresponding structure.
2.- Redefine the method QUERY; then is possible to change the parameters that the "Search Engine" (might be the Reporting Framework) uses
You can find more details in "The cookbook" and this can be found in the marketplace. If you don't have access give me your e-mail and i will send it to you.
Best Regards.
Armando Rodriguez.

Website data in advanced settings for websites never visited

How is it possible for website data to be recorded in advanced settings without visiting a website? Would other websites visited have to be related content popups? If the iphone 6 plus was used as a hot spot, can other users actions be recorded on the hot spot phone? Phone is automatically locked after short time. This user has visited sites previously on a previous iphone but not the phone in question

In addition to the server (site) that you navigate to, any inserted material on that site that is actually on another server would also be recorded, including images, embedded videos, ads, and other embedded content. Website data for another device using the phone as a hotspot will not be captured on the phone.

Neen help with date range searches for Table Sources

Hi all,
I need help, please. I am trying to satisfy a Level 1 client requirement for the ability to search for records in crawled table sources by a date and/or date range. I have performed the following steps, and did not get accurate results from Advanced searching for date. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong, and/or if there is a way to define a date search attribute without creating a LOV for a date column. (My tables have 500,00 rows.)
I am using SES 10.1.8.3 on Windows 32.
My Oracle 10g Spatial Table is called REPORTS and this table has the following columns:
TRACKNUM Varchar2
TITLE Varchar2
SUMMARY CLOB
SYMBOLCODE Varchar2
Timestamp Date
OBSDATE Date
GEOM SDO_GEOMETRY
I set up the REPORTS table source in SES, using TRACKNUM as the Primary Key (unique and not null), and SUMMARY as the CONTENT Column. In the Table Column Mappings I defined TITLE as String and TITLE.
Under Global Settings > Search Attributes I defined a new Search Attribute (type Date) called DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY).
Went back to REPORTS source previously defined and added a new Table Column Mapping - mapping OBSDATE to the newly defined DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) search attribute.
I then modified the Schedule for the REPORTS source Crawler Policy to “Process All Documents”.
Schedule crawls and indexes entire REPORTS table.
In SES Advanced Search page, I enter my search keyword, select Specific Source Group as REPORTS, select All Match, and used the pick list to select the DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) Attribute Name, operator of Greater than equal, and entered the Value 01-JAN-07. Then the second attribute name of DATE_OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY), less than equals, 10-JAN-07.
Search results gave me 38,000 documents, and the first 25 I looked at had dates NOT within the 01-JAN-07 / 10-JAN-07 range. (e.g. OBSDATE= 24-MAR-07, 22-SEP-), 02-FEB-08, etc.)
And, none of the results I opened had ANY dates within the SUMMARY CLOB…in case that’s what was being found in the search.
Can someone help me figure out how to allow my client to search for specific dated records in a db table using a single column for the date? This is a major requirement and they are anxiously awaiting my solution.
Thanks, in advance….

raford,
Thanks very much for your reply. However, from what I've read in the SES Admin Document is that (I think) the date format DD/MM/YYYY pertains only to searches on "file system" sources (e.g. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, etc.). We have 3 file system sources among our 25 total sources. The remaining 22 sources are all TABLE or DATABASE sources. The DBA here has done a great job getting the data standardized using the typical/default Oracle DATE type format in our TABLE sources (DD-MON-YY). Our tables have anywhere from 1500 rows to 2 million rows.
I tested your theory that the dates we are entering are being changed to Strings behind the scenes and on the Advanced Page, searched for results using OBSDATE equals 01/02/2007 in an attempt to find data that I know for certain to be in the mapped OBSDATE table column as 01-FEB-07. My result set contained data that had an OBSDATE of 03-MAR-07 and none containing 01-FEB-07.
Here is the big issue...in order for my client to fulfill his primary mission, one of the top 5 requirements is that he/she be able to find specific table rows that are contain a specific date or range of dates.
thanks very much!

Need help with date range searches for Table Sources in SES

Hi all,
I need help, please. I am trying to satisfy a Level 1 client requirement for the ability to search for records in crawled table sources by a date and/or date range. I have performed the following steps, and did not get accurate results from Advanced searching for date. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong, and/or if there is a way to define a date search attribute without creating a LOV for a date column. (My tables have 500,00 rows.)
I am using SES 10.1.8.3 on Windows 32.
My Oracle 10g Spatial Table is called REPORTS and this table has the following columns:
TRACKNUM Varchar2
TITLE Varchar2
SUMMARY CLOB
SYMBOLCODE Varchar2
Timestamp Date
OBSDATE Date
GEOM SDO_GEOMETRY
I set up the REPORTS table source in SES, using TRACKNUM as the Primary Key (unique and not null), and SUMMARY as the CONTENT Column. In the Table Column Mappings I defined TITLE as String and TITLE.
Under Global Settings > Search Attributes I defined a new Search Attribute (type Date) called DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY).
Went back to REPORTS source previously defined and added a new Table Column Mapping - mapping OBSDATE to the newly defined DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) search attribute.
I then modified the Schedule for the REPORTS source Crawler Policy to “Process All Documents”.
Schedule crawls and indexes entire REPORTS table.
In SES Advanced Search page, I enter my search keyword, select Specific Source Group as REPORTS, select All Match, and used the pick list to select the DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) Attribute Name, operator of Greater than equal, and entered the Value 01-JAN-07. Then the second attribute name of DATE_OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY), less than equals, 10-JAN-07.
Search results gave me 38,000 documents, and the first 25 I looked at had dates NOT within the 01-JAN-07 / 10-JAN-07 range. (e.g. OBSDATE= 10-MAR-07, 22-SEP-07, 02-FEB-08, etc.)
And, none of the results I opened had ANY dates within the SUMMARY CLOB…in case that’s what was being found in the search.
Can someone help me figure out how to allow my client to search for specific dated records in a db table using a single column for the date? This is a major requirement and they are anxiously awaiting my solution.
Thanks very much, in advance….

raford,
Thanks very much for your reply. However, from what I've read in the SES Admin Document is that (I think) the date format DD/MM/YYYY pertains only to searches on "file system" sources (e.g. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, etc.). We have 3 file system sources among our 25 total sources. The remaining 22 sources are all TABLE or DATABASE sources. The DBA here has done a great job getting the data standardized using the typical/default Oracle DATE type format in our TABLE sources (DD-MON-YY). Our tables have anywhere from 1500 rows to 2 million rows.
I tested your theory that the dates we are entering are being changed to Strings behind the scenes and on the Advanced Page, searched for results using OBSDATE equals 01/02/2007 in an attempt to find data that I know for certain to be in the mapped OBSDATE table column as 01-FEB-07. My result set contained data that had an OBSDATE of 03-MAR-07 and none containing 01-FEB-07.
Here is the big issue...in order for my client to fulfill his primary mission, one of the top 5 requirements is that he/she be able to find specific table rows that are contain a specific date or range of dates.
thanks very much!

How enable material class for Material Advance Search in MMnn transaction?

Hello,
Isn't possible to include material characteristics in Advance Search (via TREX) for every material fields in ECC? So I can enter material characteristics value in 'Full Text Search' field of material 'Advance Search for Material Using Search Engine' searchelp in order to find material that I want.
I tried to include BUS1088 in SES_ADMIN transaction and succesfully indexed it. But I still can't search with characteristic.
Would you all help me, please.... Thanks.
Regards,
Zam

Hi Colleague,
No. This function is not provided in the R/3 System. Only one record is taken into account during the free goods determination with the existence of several valid condition records. This record is the one with the largest minimum quantity. For this record the system only generates one free goods subitem.
Free goods can only be supported on a 1:1 ratio. This means that an order item can lead to a free goods item. Agreements in the following form are not supported: #eWith material 1, material 2 and material 3 are free of charge#e or #eIf material 1 and material 2 are ordered at the same time, then material 3 is free of charge#e.
You can refer FAQ note 549963 which clarifies this point.
I hope it can be helpful.
Regards
Ruy Castro

PC UI Advanced Search - Enhancement by standard fields of transaction table

Hello,
we are using CRM 5.0 SP13.
We are familiar to enhance PC UI applications (BP+transactions) by EEW customer fields and how to use/hide them in the search functionalities etc.
But now we need to enhance the advanced search for leads by the POSTING_DATE date of table CRMD_ORDERADM_H. Unfortunytely in PC UI advanced search structure for leads CRMT_BSP_LEA_SEARCH_ME the POSTING_DATE is not included like it is in the opportunity advanced search structure CRMT_BSP_OPP_SEARCH, where we were able to enhance the search easily by CRMC_BLUEPRINT_C customizing.
The idea is to solve the problem to create EEW fields POSTING_DATE_FROM and POSTING_DATE_TO like they are existing in CRMT_BSP_OPP_SEARCH and use them in advanced search. So far no problem in creating and displaying the EEW fileds by CRMC_BLUEPRINT_C.
But the part we are missing is to link the new EEW fields to the standard database-field POSTING_DATE and implement the search functionality "Searching by select option POSTING_DATE_FROM and POSTING_DATE_TO".
Anybody any experience to link EEW-fields to standard fields of database tables for advanced search functionality in PC UI.
Thank you for your help in advance.
Best regards
Marco

Hi Marco,
The best option here is to create redefination of the query method of the leads search class. Here you can first ensure that the call to the query method of super class takes place and the next would be do mapping between custom fields to local structure and then call the relevant API's to fetch the data.
Best Regards, Adil

Time Frame option in Opporutnity advanced search from PCUI

Hi,
We have Time frame,Valid to Valid from time option in advanced search for Opportunity but When i checked this it is not pulling the data on Creation date or Closed data or Even the Start date of opportunity.
Kindly help me in understanding the logic for this funcitonality.
Thanks
Naveen

Resolved

Issue while enabling Advanced Search functionality in Agent Inbox

Hi Experts,
We have enhanced the Agent inbox search to include few EEWB fields. The basic search is functioning smoothly and search is working on both standard and EEWB fields.
But after configuring the Advanced Search for agent inbox, we are not able to find the EEWB fields in the Advance search dropdowns to be searched upon.
We checked the ICCMP_INBOX/InboxAdvancedSearch view configuration and the EEWB fields are also not available in the list of available fields, but are present in the Context node 'SEARCH'.
Are we missing on some configuration?
Any pointers towards the solution would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Saumya

Closing this thread due to lack of replies

How to restrict columns in Advanced search which are known at runtime

Hi Team,
I need your suggestions for one of my adf search usecase. I had Querypanel with table on UI...where in Viewobject has relations with 2 other tables and this Viewobject is based on Entity...now in advanced search for addfields i was getting all column names by default like 3 tables column names....instead of all columns i need to restrict to particular columns. This particular columns will be decided at runtime like how many columns needs to be shown and alias names for those particular columns. So could you please help me how to approach this requirement.
Thanks in Advance for your help.

whatever you said is at designtime wherein we can uncheck the Queryable checkbox....but as i said at runtime from the application i can come to know whichever fields needs to be there and alias names for columns for add fields in Advanced search...

Enabling Multiple Search in Advanced search

Hi All,
I am trying to enable Multiple search on a particular field in the advanced search for that PCUI application. E.g Search for Opportunities with Partner P1 and P2.
When i perform the search the results show me all opportunities with partner P1 OR Partner P2. So i get all opportunities which belong to partner either P1 or P2 or both
I want to view all opportunities with partner P1 AND P2 i.e i want to search only for those opportunities that have both P1 and P2 in it
Is there anyway we can achieve this
Thanks and Regards,
Varun

Hello,
The MAC for the the advanced search in opportunities (application CRMD_BUS2000111) is CL_CRM_BSP_AM_HEADME_1O.
Create a Z MAC inheriting from this MAC and redefine the method IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL~QUERY.
In you redefined method, you can for example first call the super query method and do your own additional selections after.
The FM used for the standard query is CRM_BSP_OIC_1O_SEARCH_FROM_RF.
You can maybe also check how this FM is called and make you own call of this FM.
Regards,
Frederic

SRM 7.0 Advanced Search Object Type

Dear All,
We use SRM 7.0, I want to remove some object types from Advanced Search options in Portal. For example, in standard advanced search, you can select shopping card, confirmation, purchase order, contract... etc. And i dont want some emplyees to see all purchase order or contracts.
How am i going to delete for example purchase order option from advanced search ?
Best regards,

Hi
Advanced search drop down menu is based on SPRO configuration
SRM server -- Cross application basic settings -- POWL and Adv search
Here Standard object types will be defined as SAP entries under define objects types for advanced search.
Also, default application will be assigned for each object types.
If you deleted any of these standard object types, then that object type will not be available in advanced search for any SRM roles. However, that is not advisable to deleted standard objects.
Alternatively, if you want restrict certain group of users to access the some object types, you can control through the configuration powl_queryR which is query visibility at role level.
You can control the the same at user level if you want through powl_queryU
Regards,
Krish

Expanded data in Advanced Search for UI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for