Extended Classic Patches. and BBP_LOCATION_GET_ALL. doesn't exist.

Hi SRM GURUS,
I am Implementing SRM 5.5 with Extended Classic scenario, Bidding Engine and Plan driven procurement. I have question, To run this scenario, do we have install any patches?. If yes, what are those please name them. Or tell me where can I find those.
Another question: When I am trying to replicate locations (Plants). I have run the program BBP_LOCATION_GET_ALL.
The systems says that the program doesn't exist. What to do?.
Please explain .... Thanks in Advances.
Regards,
John.

Hi John
BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_SELECTED .check this report too
or location in the report in se38. what are the reports do you get.
is there any syntax error while you search. i smell a rat here.
br
muthu

Similar Messages

Hi there - I have a Mac and use the 15.0 version of Adobe Illustrator. I can't locate the pattern tool under the 'Options' tab. I also checked the help section and it doesn't exist.

Hi there - I have a Mac and use the 15.0 version of Adobe Illustrator. I can't locate the pattern tool under the 'Options' tab. I also checked the help section and it doesn't exist.

Thanks Manish!
I was following the instructions my teacher sent and there was no mention of what program the tutorial used. I ended up finding a pattern tutorial for CS5.
Rosa

Extended Classic Scenerio and Vendor Text

This subject has been brought up before, I've reviewed all those messages. The standard SRM product does not replicate vendor text to the backend system in the extended classic mode.
Having said that, I've been trying to make this work and hope someone here can give me some insight on what I am doing wrong.
In my setup, SRM is using function module B46B_DPO_TRANSFER to send the purchase order to R/3. This fm has a table called i_longtext that contains the header text.
B46B_DPO_TRANSFER calls FUNCTION 'BBP_PO_INBOUND' DESTINATION lv_destination" to create the PO on R/3. This call is missing the POTEXTHEADER table definition. So, I've modified the call to include this table and also filled the table with the following values:
po_item = 00000
text_id = F01 "this value was obtained from the text type for purchase order header configuration settings in R/3"
text_form = *
text_line = "the message that was typed in the header text"
I can't seem to get the header text to appear on the purchase order in the backend, has anyone been successful in making this work?
Kind regards,
Shawn O'Connor

Hi
Incase BBP_LONGTEXT_BADI does not helps, then you can use the BADI, which i mentioned in my earlier post.
In the BADI - BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER, there is a table structure, which holds the long text data.
Refer table ET_SC_LONGTEXT inside ENRICH_ITEM_DATA method of this BADI.
Here is the documenatation of this BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER BADI.
Short Text
Transfer Shopping Cart from Catalog
You can use the Business Add-In BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER to change or add to the data that the catalog returns to SAP Enterprise Buyer via the catalog interface.
Note that your changes also affect the following applications in SAP Enterprise Buyer:
Confirm Goods Receipt/Service Entry
Plan Products for Maintenance Order
The call of this BAdI occurs in function module 'BBP_WS_IMPORT_SC_DATA'. This module is called by the relevant application to import catalog items previously sent by the browser of the user to the application Web server from there. After the catalog has transferred the data to SAP Enterprise Buyer the system carries out the following actions.
Conversion of ISO code of unit of measure and currency to SAP format
Conversion of price field to SAP format
In the case of transfer of a material or service number:
The system reads the product master with this number. If the number exists, the system transfers from the product master record the description and the purchase order unit of measure.
In the case of a partner number:
The system reads the business partner master with this number. If the number does not exist, the number in the shopping cart item is reset.
Note
In previous Releases, only the tables with the prefix "ENRICHED" were available. These were then returned to the calling application and transferred to the relevant document structure from there. From this Release on, the data is transferred from the current document structure to the application. The relevant tables are included as additional parameters (parameters with the prefix "ET_SC_").
New implementations should use these tables only and set the parameter "ev_sc_structures_used". In order that previous implementations need not be changed, a mapping occurs after the BADI. The parameter controls the mapping direction:
Set: New structure overwrites old structure
Not set: Old structure overwrites new structure
In the method ENRICH_ITEM_DATA, the following parameters are available:
catalog_content
This parameter contains the original data that the catalog transferred to the catalog interface. The structure corresponds exactly to the catalog interface. The data in this parameter is only for information purposes, you make any changes in the parameters et_sc_item_data , et_sc_accounting, et_sc_partner, et_sc_orgdata, et_sc_longtext, and et_sc_messages.
Note
The catalog interface also contains customer fields that you can use for your own purposes. You can pass these on in fields that the application can use further.
enriched_item_data
This parameter contains the data for a shopping cart item in Enterprise Buyer.
Note
This table should not be used in new implementations (see above Note).
enriched_acct_data
This parameter contains all account assignment fields. This parameter is empty at this time in the standard system.
Note
This table should not be used in new implementations (see above Note).
enriched_item_longtext
This parameter contains the long texts for the items.
Note
This table should not be used in new implementations (see above Note).
catalog_content_errors
This parameter contains the error messages that occurred when the catalog items were being enriched.
Note
This table should not be used in new implementations (see above Note).
ev_sc_structures_used
This parameter has to be set if the following tables are used in the implementation (recommended procedure, see Note above) et_sc_item_data This parameter contains the data of a shopping cart item in Enterprise Buyer.
et_sc_accounting
This parameter contains all account assignment fields. In the standard system, this parameter is empty at this time.
et_sc_partner
This parameter contains the links to the requester and the supplier, if used.
et_sc_orgdata
This parameter contains the links to the org. data for the partners from
et_sc_partner.
et_sc_longtext
This parameter contains the long texts for the items.
et_sc_messages
This parameter contains the error messages that occurred during enrichment of catalog items. If this table contains a message of type 'E', the item causing this error is not transferred to et_sc_item_data. If the item is added in the BADI again (from the data from catalog_content), the relevant error message should be deleted, since the current SRM Server application generally searches this table for error messages of type 'E' in order to output an error message to the user.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

Extended classic scenario and printout in ERP

Hi,
we want to use extended classic scenario but the printout of the PO should happen in the backend system. PO is already created in the ERP system but I can't change it (as designed). How is it possible to create the printout from the backend?
Thanks
Hubert

Hi Hubert
This consulting note is for triggering Output of PO from ECC instead of SRM. Printing can happen from ECC if you can switch off PO Output form SRM and start triggering the same from ECC as per consulting note.
Try working with this FM In SRM BBP_OUTPUT_PO_PRINT_REMOTE for printing the PO, if PO Output is still required to be triggered from SRM.
Regards
Virender Singh

I can't log into my Apple ID account, I wish to change my email address, as I don't use the one that is already my Apple ID now, and it doesn't exist anymore, but It won't let me log in, it keeps saying username or password wrong, when I believe what

HHow can I change my Apple ID,, it's not letting me log into my account as I don't use the current email address for that Apple ID anymore, that email address does not exist anymore, and I want to change it to a new one

Where are you trying to log in? You should be able to change your ID at http://appleid.apple.com - can you log in there?
Before you change your ID you should log out of the iTunes Store and on any devices which are logged into iCloud. Then once you've changed it you can log back in with the new ID. (Your iCloud synced data will disappear from the device when you do this but will reappear when you sign back in - give it time).
If you are unable to sign into http://appleid.apple.com you will need to contact Support. Go to http://iforgot.apple.com and sign in with your iCloud login. A new password will be sent to your associated email address. If this doesn't work you will have to contact Support. Go to https://getsupport.apple.com . Click' See all products and services', then 'More Products and Services, then 'Apple ID', then 'Other Apple ID Topics' then 'Lost or forgotten Apple ID password'. If you have any problems with that try this form: https://www.apple.com/emea/support/itunes/contact.html

Bought dock adapter for classic 160GB and it doesn't fit

Came in 3 pack, but all three are completely identical and all of them are too big. Product number ma126g/a. What do I do?

The Dock Adaptors dfo usually ship as a three-pack, so that's why you have three identical adaptors. The MA126G/A will fit the early iPod Classic 160GB. So if your iPod Classic is a "late 2009" model (160Gb), the adaptor you would require is the MA125G/A.
However, I think you may be advised to check the model of iPod you have first. You can do that here; http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1353.
Your iPod should come with one Dock Adaptor in the box, do you still have it? If you do find it, it may help you to know that on the underside of the adaptor is a number,
and the number on the MA126G/A is 10. So if you find the adaptor that shipped with your iPod, and it says number 9, then you have a "late 2009" iPod Classic 160GB. (I'm not sure why the picture suggests that the number is between 15-20. I have several adaptors with number outside that range!)

Why does Firefox require a Plug In for Windows Media 11 and it doesn't exist for Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit

I wanted to listen to an Internet Radio Station and every time I clicked the listen now button on that site, Firefox tells me a Plug In is required for Window Media Player 11 so I follow the link to be told it is a manual download. When I get to the download site, I cannot find a Plug In download that is suitable to Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit so, I cannot listen to the radio station I want too and would like to know if there are any other options.

You can use the new WMP plugin for XP/Vista as well on Windows 7 with WMP 11.
See:
*[[Using the Windows Media Player plugin with Firefox]]
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Windows_Media_Player#Missing_plugin

Oranization Unit and Position doesn't exist in pa0001

Hello all,
I am new to HR , i had created one Org Unit in tcode PPOC_OLD and also some positions under it with some holders assigned to these positions .
These entries can be seen in table HRP1001 but not in table pa0001 . when i give the pernr which is holder in the org unit the entries for the coressponding pernr are ORGEH as 000000000 and PLANS as 99999999.
can any one let me know why these entries are nt been reflected in pa0001 table.
Thanks,
Ravi

Hi Ravi!
You have to switch on the integration between OM and HR. To do this please use the feature PLOGI (transaction PE03).
After this is done run one of the reports RHINTE*, to write the organisational assignments to infotype 1.
Kind regards
Peter

How differentiate POs classic scenario and POs extended classic scenario?

Hi Gurus,
Is possible determine that some POs are generated in SRM system and send to R3 (Extended classic scenario) and other POs only to send from SRM to R3 system (classic scenario) in the same system?
How we can differentiate which POs should be sent to R3 (classic scenario) and which not? Is possible use type of document for example? Could you explain me if exists standard process?
The objective is determining the following: Is necessary differentiating POs created in SRM of importation and should be sent to R3 system (classic scenario), and in case of local POs (not importation) is necessary extended classic scenario.
I have understood that there is a scenario that includes the Classic and Extended Classic, I think is called Decoupled scenario.
Thanks for your help!!

Hello,
Yes this is possible.
You can do it automatically based on the product category. You must define the back-end system you wish to use for each product category by making the relevant settings in Customizing for SAP SRM under SRM Server --> Technical Basic Settings --> Define Backend System for Product Category
Check the online documentation here: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm701/helpdata/en/f3/6f505050404ce99151722a79a2c089/frameset.htm
You can also use Business Add-In BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI to overwrite settings made in Activate Extended Classic Scenario and implement more rues for the scenario determination, e.g. based on the purchasing organization for manually created PO's.
First you set you system to Activate Extended Classic Scenario : SPRO --> SAP Supplier Relationship Management --> SRM Server --> Cross-Application Basic Settings --> Activate Extended Classic Scenario.
Then you set exceptions in the BAdI.
Regards
Franck

Popup : OrgUnit doesn't exist. while creating Contract in SRM 7.0

Hi Experts,
I am using Extended classic senario and upgraded from SRM5.0 to SRM7.0.
While creating Contract I am getting popu : OrgUnit doesn't exist. This error is not stopping to create contract.
How to remove this error popup? please suggest.
Reg,
Rajesh.

Hi Rajesh,
I am also getting the same message while creating a contract in SRM 7.0.
we have upgraded from SRM 5.0 to SRM 7.0
Whether you have raised any OSS message
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

Extended Classic Scenario - Free Items?

Does SAP support PO's in Extended Classic Scenario with a zero price (free items)?
My client is switching from classic to extended classic scenario and they require to be able to creaet PO's that have a zero price like they have in the classic scenario.
We are currently getting an error that we need a price with the IR flag, but I would expect the system to automatically unflag the IR flag for a free item?

Hi Jay,
Thanks for your response. There are two problems with your soluiton. First the shopping cart doesn't have the IR flag on it and can't be changed by the user and we have PO's created directly from SC's and go out to the vendor.
Second, In extended classic scenario it apprears that the system doesn't allow you to change the ir flag on the PO and make the cooresponding change in the ERP PO.

Anybody ever created multple PO doc type/number ranges in extended classic?

I have searched this forum, and found plenty of useful threads which would help me determine different document types/number ranges for back-end purchase orders in a classic scenario. (And I have done something similar many years ago on a classic EBP 3.0 implementation)
However, I have a customer who has an SRM 5 extended classic implementation, and who (Based on certain simple criteria) requires a different PO number range to identify certain types of indirect orders. (They also have direct materials procured using doc type ECDP, but that's not relevant to this requirement)
This would obviously have to apply to the local PO in SRM, as well as the backend ECC PO.
It would also need to be derived for orders created automatically via approved shopping carts, as well as those orders that are created via sourcing.
I've copied ECPO via define transaction types IMG step, as well as assigned a new number range.
Just to test, I've also added the second doc type in the BSA attribute for a particular test user - just initially see if it was possible to manually choose when creating a PO in sourcing. However, I could only get ECDP and ECPO.
I have looked at various BADIs to see if I can determine doc type or number range somewhere in the PO creation, but as far as I can see, they either:
- Seem to apply only to the object type (PO, requisition, reservation etc) rather than the transaction type within that object.
- Or look like they are too late in the process to influence the doc type and number range (BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI?) ... which doesn't seem to have those doc type or PO number fields available anyway
- Or I doesn't seem to be trigerred at all when turning requirement into Po and ordering via sourcing. (tried break-point & endless loop in implemnetation of BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW, but nothing happened. In any case the PO number was alreadya ssigned)
If anybody has ever managed this before, or can tell me that I am definitely barking up the wrong tree, it would be gratefully appreciated. The document type is actually lesss important than the different number range... and was really just an attempt to trigger a different number. I'm starting to think that this sort of thing may only be possible in a classic implemntation.
What I need ideally, would have been some kind of 'local PO' equivelent of the BADI that enables you to determine transaction type for a bid.
Regards,
Vince
Edited by: Vincent White on Dec 6, 2010 5:13 PM

Hi. Not sure on this, but I can tell you that with extended classic it is BADI BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI that is called for the backend PO instead of the CREATEPO_BACK BADI.
You can have a look in BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI and see if that helps?
Don't think it will influence the PO in SRM at all though.
Have you tried the number range / grouping BADIs? They definitly work for changing the number range for classic POs.
Regards,
Dave.

Extended Classic Scenario - PO Update issue

Hello experts.
We are working with SRM 5 in the extended classic scenario and we have a serious problem in a productive environment for the following case.
(01) We create a purchase requisition (PR) in R/3 with several items;
(02) We send PR to the SRM generating a shopping cart;
(03) The buyer creates a PO for all items from the shopping cart;
(04) The PO is transmitted to R/3;
(05) For some cases buyer changes the PO wich is sent back (updated) to R/3;
So far so good. The problem happens when some item in the request already has GR or Invoice. In those cases when the PO is updated on SRM, its transmission to R/3 does not occur, generating an error log that can be seen in transaction RZ20 of SRM.
I understand that if any GR or Invoice exists for the item it can no longer be modified, but is it expected that no other item can also be modified from SRM? What is the expected behavior for this case?
Moreover, even if the GR and Invoice have been canceled, we are still unable to update the PO in R/3 from SRM. Is this a expected behavior? It was our understanding that the PO should be updated if all incoming documents (GR, Invoice, SES ..) were completely canceled.
We appreciate any help on this matter.
Thanks and Regards,
Evandro Miasato

Hi, Masa,
Thank you for your advice,
I set the method U:Print Using Berkeley Protocol, after that
in trx. SP01 I have the Error Status on Composite Document -
Status Incorrect (Reason Unknown).
Best regards,
Guzal.

Extended classic scenario to Classic scenarioc in SRM.??

someone pls tell me how to change from Extended classic scenario to Classic scenarion while creating in shopping cart...?
I am using BADI "BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI" change to classic scenarion from extending classic..but i got confused about source code..So i request any one can help me for suitable source code..

Hi
Do you mean to say that you have set up Extended Classic Scenario but you want to change it to Classic Scenario?... If this is the case, remove the activation in COnfiguration for Extended classic scenario and deactivate BADIs you ve implemented for Extended Classic
OR
Do you want to change it to Classic only for the Document user is creating.--> Read the indicator or data from SC and decide whether the document has to be in Classic or Extended classic SCenario.... The BADI will either have Extended classic = X or NOT.... so there is no parameter for classic Scen... Depending on your requirements, implement the ext. classic badi to SET it or NOT set it...
Regards
Virender SIngh

Extended Classic Scenario - how does the integration work ?

Hi,
Apologies for asking a basic question, but we are looking at requirements for integrating SRM with R/3 using the extended classic scenario and I need to understand how the integration actually works ? How is the data transferred between the 2 systems ? Does it use BADI's, idocs etc ?
Many thanks,
fiona

Hi Olaf,
I just wanted to give some precision on what you said (in the thread How to "see" PO in EBP ? also)
The Extended classic scenario only refers to the local PO creation replicated in R/3.
In this scenario, in the R/3 PO only the data not managed/sent from the SRM are available for modification (which depends on the SRM version you use)
The "PR transfer from R/3" is called "Plan driven procurement", and in this scenario only RFC is used, the qRFC are only used for BDocs of the CRM Middleware.
Regards.
Vadim

Extended Classic Patches. and BBP_LOCATION_GET_ALL. doesn't exist.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for