Extra-Tables

Dear all,
With 11GR1, I have created two tables ,but with these two here one can see two strange table name in TAB not in USER_TABLES.
SQL> select tname from tab;
TNAME
BIN$ApqPvBz0RHqsrBNGmJNXSA==$0
BIN$Wgrvtsv2RJSOQgSEkp0hdw==$0
TEST1
TEST2
SQL> select table_name from user_tables;
TABLE_NAME
TEST1
TEST2
SQL> desc tab
Name Null? Type
TNAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
TABTYPE VARCHAR2(7)
CLUSTERID NUMBER
SQL> select tname,tabtype from tab;
TNAME TABTYPE
BIN$ApqPvBz0RHqsrBNGmJNXSA==$0 TABLE
BIN$Wgrvtsv2RJSOQgSEkp0hdw==$0 TABLE
TEST1 TABLE
TEST2 TABLE
SQL> desc BIN$ApqPvBz0RHqsrBNGmJNXSA==$0
SP2-0565: Illegal identifier.
SQL> select * from BIN$ApqPvBz0RHqsrBNGmJNXSA==$0
2 ;
select * from BIN$ApqPvBz0RHqsrBNGmJNXSA==$0
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
Is it a BUG ?
:-)

Those tables are in the recycle bin. By default, when you DROP table, Oracle just moves it to the recycle bin in 10g and later. That allows you to undrop the table at some point in the future.
You can prevent that by adding the PURGE command when you drop a table, i.e.
DROP TABLE table_name PURGEor by disabling the recycle bin. You can also clean out the recycle bin
PURGE dba_recyclebin;or
PURGE user_recyclebinJustin

Similar Messages

  • How do I get rid of the extra table of contents that appears following the Pages export to epub?

    When I export my document to epub out of Pages and then open it in ibooks (or any other ereader for that matter)  an extra table of contents with links to the document sections appears at the beginning. This toc has its own numbering system--with its numbers set in front of those I have assigned. This toc is ugly and superfluous and doesn't seem to have anything to do with the table of contents available in the dropdown menu used while actually reading the document. How do I get rid of this extra table of contents? I'm sure I must be missing something obvious, but I can't find a way to remove it. Thanks for any help with this problem.

    Answer available from TomV256: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5486013?start=15&tstart=0

  • Creating extra tables while reversing the schema

    Hi,
    while reversing a schema, ODI is createing some extra tables with name starting BIN....
    BIN$n0N0JG+2TE676lf8wPm3Kw==$0
    BIN$B3QnNwKfRwiJBzUokrdaOQ==$0
    BIN$SlMSt8GRTMeRu92uIx77zA==$0
    BIN$jdFr+kpVQkKobqoU6OY4fw==$0
    BIN$iRX5BQw3TR+jEGZfvUB1cQ==$0
    BIN$3lg8BtTjQ5S0m/E2Sm5Fxw==$0
    These extra tables are creating problems.
    Please help me why these tables are getting created.....
    Thanks,
    Naveen Suram

    Oracle maintains a recycle bin for dropped objects starting with Oracle 10g. Dropped tables go "into" the recyclebin, and can be restored (undropped) from the recycle bin.
    The recycle bin is enabled by default.
    SQL>ALTER SYSTEM SET recyclebin = OFF; -- It will disable recycle bin for the entire database
    SQL> ALTER SESSION SET recyclebin = OFF; -- It will disable recycle bin for the session
    Tables can also be dropped without sending them to the recycle bin.
    DROP TABLE t1 PURGE;
    Thanks,
    Sutirtha

  • Extra Table of Contents entry

    Has anybody seen an issue with iBooks Author where they get an extra blank Table of Contents entry at the beginning of the book?
    In iBooks Author, my TOC shows 10 entries. Yet when it is exported to ibooks format, the ibook contains 11 TOC entries, with the first one being blank.
    The template I used has a placeholder for Intro Media which I did not use, and I'm wondering if this is part of the problem. Yet I can't find anywhere to disable putting Intro Media into the book, and because the TOC entry is blank, I can't tell what it is actually trying to point to.
    Thanks,
    Katrina

    I believe it was the first example. Here's a screenshot that sort of illustrates the problem.
    Chapter 1 - Introduction, is actually the 4th TOC entry, but is the 5th highlighted dot on the bottom (there are title, copyright, and dedication pages prior). I don't have a screenshot of what's displayed when the first dot is highlighted (the error condition). Note a total of 11 dots at the bottom.
    Interestingly, the following screenshot comes from the same reading session, I believe, and the TOC looks fine.
    When I asked my tester to try to obtain a screenshot of the blank entry, he reloaded the file and the problem had disappeared. Note the now correct 10 dots at the bottom, with title page correctly highlighted as first.
    So, thanks for your help KT, but I'm going to have to chalk this one up to an unreproducible glitch, or something strange on first-time loads. Reminds me of the infamous software testing line: "works on my machine". ;-)

  • IE table rendering issues. Any ideas how to eliminate extra cell spacing rendered by IE

    I have a problem with IE 9 rendering a table. This particular page has a larger table rendered for an application.
        1. I have disabled all CSS on the site (its strictly in the table render on the site)
        2. Removed as much spacing as possible in the RAZOR view of the application to try to eliminate whitespace issue in code  
        3. Ensured that there are no extra characters in the text (from the DB) so stripping out anything that is non alphanumeric.
    When IE renders this site note that there is not any extra table elemnents missing there are closing tags on all elements and no syntatical issues.
    I have seen other sites with this issue in IE 9 on Windows 7.
    A table is not ideal here but that is how it was written.
    (Since I don't see an e-mail or anything to verify my account here is a "non-link" to my screenshot of an example)
    i.imgur.com/av8FCZL.png
    Does anyone know how to solve this issue in IE? Also is a side by side of other browser results.

    Thanks Rob for the reply,
    The page passes validation. The CSS was only disabled on the site to determine if it was causing my spacing issue on the table. Initally the CSS was the suspect, but it was eliminated by only showing the raw table element with the same behavior in the browser.
    I will need to convert the table to CSS style or another format (probably a JQuery UI Data Table would be more appropriate in my case)... In any event  I inherited this site so I have not had the time to change the tables out yet. (That was the first
    thing out of my mouth when I reviewed the application was proposing not to use the HTML tables tag for that data). 
    Interestingly enough I can kid of remedy the behavior in IE if I remove line spaces from my Razor view so maybe IE is interpreting the spacing rendered by the Razor view on the table strangely from the code output? I did find a post with another person having
    a similar problem rendering large tables in razor view and they solved the issue by removing line spacing inside of the chtml file.  
    In any case this solves it for the time being... not an ideal solution but a workable one until the table view can be converted to a better format for such a large table. 

  • Unable to pull data from 2 tables of a database linked to a 2nd database

    I have a Crystal V7 Report I'm upgrading to Crystal 10 or 11.  It uses the following formula that works (data is in ONE MS Access database containing all three tables):
    If {PayrollCalc.qSource}=0  then {AuthorizedWithholding.qDesc
    else If {PayrollCalc.qSource}=1 or {PayrollCalc.qSource}= 2 then {UnionBenefitDetail.qUBDesc}
    else
    If {PayrollCalc.qSource}=4 then "Extra Tax" + {PayrollCalc.qID} else
    If {PayrollCalc.qSource}=5 then "Payroll Insurance" else
    If {PayrollCalc.qSource}=6 then {PayrollCalc.qID} else
    Mid ({PayrollCalc.qID},2 )
    The upgraded application software uses TWO SQL 2005 Express databases, replacing the one Access database.  PayrollCalc is a table in database A while UnionBenefitDetail & AuthorizedWithholding are tables in database B.  The links are left outer joined from PayrollCalc table to each of the others (I've tried all the enforcement options) but the formula no longer works.  If I remark out the part of the formula from one or the other of the "extra" tables, then the one still active works great but I can't get both to work in the same subreport.  There's no error, I just get a blank returned for the formula.  I'm not familiar with using the Add Command so I haven't tried that.  Can anyone help me?

    I confirmed that the join fields are identical:
    PRCalc Table - qConNo=int (32 bit), length 4
    PRCalc Table - qID=varchar (byte), length 10
    PRCalc Table - qSeg=int (32 bit), length 4
    UnionBenefit Table - qUBID=varchar (byte), length 10
    UnionBenefit Table - qUBSeg=int (32 bit), length 4
    Both of these UnionBenefit fields are left outer joined FROM the PRCalc Table's qID & qSeg fields
    Authorized Withholding - qConNo=int (32 bit), length 4
    Authorized Withholding - qSeg=int (32 bit), length 4
    These two fields are left outer joined FROM PRCalc's qConNo & qSeg fields.
    The qDesc & qUBDesc fields that I'm trying to print in the same subreport using the formula that's not working are both varchar (bye), length 50 fields.
    I have tried various other joins unsuccessfully.  I'm convinced that the left outer join is the correct one to use since neither of the tables from Database B will always have records that match up with those in Database A (PayrollCalc's database).  So yes, it appears that the left outer join does not work properly across two databases when more than one table in the 2nd database is used.  It works fine if I just use one table from database B & do a separate subreport for the other table.

  • Not able to export all table data to excel

    Hi All,
    I am using jdev 11.1.1.4.0
    I want to export all my table data to a excel file.
    I used ADF inbuilt <af:exportCollectionActionListener/> to do the same.
    Also, I have pagination on my JSPX.
    When I click on export button to export the data, it exports current records in the page not all the records.
    For instance, I have 100 records in my table and I am displaying 20 records per page.
    When I click on export to excel image, it exports current 20 records instead of exporting all 100 records.
    Please tell me how to export all the records to the excel.
    Sample code,
    <af:exportCollectionActionListener exportedId="t1" type="excelHTML"/>t1 is id of my table from which I want to export the data.
    also, I have tried exportedRows="all" - but it doesn't work!!!!
    Appreciate your help.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Madhav K.

    Hi Arunkumar,
    thanks for your reply.
    Yes, it works....
    But I don't want to do the same in such way.
    Because almost every page I have export to excel functionality.
    So if follow this way then I have extra table on every page. I don't want this in my application.
    Is there any other way???
    Thanks and Regards,
    Madhav K.

  • Table width not displaying correctly in IE - Works in Mozilla / Chrome

    I am working tirelessly trying to optimize my site for SEO purposes and I have been able to strip out over a hundred lines of extra code while maintaining my sites look. The problem is in doing so I messed something up - well at least Internet Explorer seems to think so. My site renders just fine in Mozilla and Chrome but for whatever reason, the width of the main table for my product pages is showing up a lot wider than it should. I currently have it set to 859 pixels but Explorer is rendering a much larger table. For the life of me, I can not figure out why this is happening. Our sites homepage The BlueDot is located at http://www.thebluedot.net is showing up as it should in Explorer, but if you click on any of the products it goes wider for some reason? I have limited code access in my store front whereas I have complete control over my home page. Again - it shows as it should in Mozilla and Chrome but not Explorer...
    If you happen to decide to help and see anything else I can strip down in the code or make more Google friendly - please let me know - I would so much appreciate any help you could provide. I have tried stripping out any extra tables I could with my current experience with CSS, HTML and Div tags but I know I could probably strip out much more unneeded code if my skills were a bit better.
    What am I doing wrong in my code that explorer is deciding to make the table width much wider?
    Thanks so much in advance.

    body {
         background-color:fff;
         font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
         color: #006;     
    Add a # to your background color above.
    Also align="center" is deprecated code just so you know. It looks like the table is being populated dynamically from a database. Tables will expand to hold the content it's given - just make sure your dynamically created tables use CSS that constrains the width as you desire it. Potentially this is an ASP .NET control issue (it looks like you're using .asp) and you may need to change that (the control) through whatever CSS it uses.
    Hope this helps.

  • Inserting into Linked table

    I am writing some code to copy some data from point A (the client's Oracle database) to point B (the client's DB/2 database). I'm trying to determine the least problematic way of dealing with the inserts to a heterogeneously linked table and updates to the source table.
    Working in an ideal world, in one transaction I would insert each row to the linked table and mark the source row as "processed". Each source row produces one target row, and the commit would happen after each row. Will this work and can it be relied upon to commit and/or rollback together, even if the link goes down? My other option, which I've seen done in several pieces of code that we have in our organization, is to perform all actions in local tables, and then at the last minute in a separate transaction, do a bulk copy "insert into tableA select from tableB". Most of these examples are moving data FROM the external table TO our internal database and then processing them.
    So my question is, is it always a good idea to do this bulk copy method, or is it mostly necessary only when you're NOT committing after each row? Or is it dependent on what sort of external database you're linking to? If I'm to add an extra "staging" table, then I also have to deal with deleting the rows after they're inserted in to the linked table, and figuring out how to deal with the possibility that this job might be running twice at the same time. So I'd like to avoid it if I can. But if it's all around safer to use an extra table, I will.
    Thanks for your thoughts!
    Christine Wolak

    Kamal, from the example you gave, the table you're inserting into is named "[email protected]", right? That sounds like an Oracle instance. This apparently works fine Oracle-to-Oracle, but not so much when the other side of the link is a different kind of database. In my case, I'm trying to copy the data to a DB2 table. From the text I've seen, the way the "insert into ... select from ..." works, is the TARGET database has to know how to do the "select from" part, and if it's not an Oracle database, there's no guarantee that it can.
    I've also found that I cannot even have a distributed transaction of any kind (without buying Oracle's Transparent Gateway Services, I think). I've tried committing my updates of my own table and insert into a remote table from within the same transaction, and I get ORA-02047 (cannot join the distributed transaction).
    So it looks like I will be stuck not only copying the rows one by one, but also "crossing my fingers" that my second transaction goes through. Actually, I'm planning something like this:
    1. Do my updates in my local table, including setting the "complete" flag to Yes, and commit.
    2. Do the insert into the remote table, and commit.
    3. If the insert gets an error, change the "complete" flag back to No (so it'll get picked up the next time around), and commit. If THIS step gets an error, I'll log a message indicating that operator intervention is required.
    I'm guessing that 99.999% of the time this will run without a hitch, and I think that's pretty much all I can ask for, without buying Transparent Gateway. Unless someone else here as a better suggestion? I'm all ears...
    Christine

  • Another user-modified table  'Items' (ODBC -2039)

    I have a problem with the Items object. I have a folder on the Item MasterData  form and a extra table that stores the info from that tab.
    When I try to update an item i get this error message :
    Another user-modified table  'Items' (OITM or OITW) (ODBC -2039)
    I can update items normally if my addon is stopped. I have read something about a similar message about PO, but I get the error on all items( even newly added ones) so I don't think it's about them being involved in PO.
    Any ideas on this matter ?

    Hi,
    I faced a similar error once, i also modified the Item Master screen and added a tab with an extra table, then i was modifing the FORM MODE explicitly.
    If ur are modifing the FORM MODE explicitly we may get this error.
    Vasu Natari.

  • How to  Find Logical Database with table name

    Shankar

    Version 4.6x
    If you need to find the logical database for a table name, you can used <b>SE36</b> - Logical Database Bulider.
    Steps :-
    Go to transaction <b>SE36</b>
    Click <b>Extras -> Table usage</b>
    Supply the Table name and hit enter.
    A Display Logical Database will be shown on a pop-up windows.
    Reward  points  if it is  usefull ....
    Girish

  • Numbers - Strange Table/Sheet behaviour

    I have a simple document open: one worksheet with a table for bank statement analysis.
    I looked at the side bar and saw under the Sheet arrow that there were 2 identical tables - Table 1 and Table 2
    Perhaps I had duplicated the first table as Table 2 was a copy.
    I selected Table 2 and pressed deleted.
    Table 1 then changed to a completely BLANK table with all the information lost - hours of work.
    I pressed Command Z to undo - but this did not restore the deleted work or any of the information.
    Luckily I had not saved the delete so saved the document without changes and thank goodness - all the original work was still there - table 1 and table t2
    duplicated
    I save this document as a test copy and then tried deleting the extra table 2 - same thing: all of table 1's contents were also wiped.
    This time UNDO worked and both tables were restored.
    THen I tried deleting Table 1 - this WORKED and Table 2 is left with the correct information.
    I would appreciate if anyone who has an explanation could offer it
    best
    MS

    MS,
    I suggest that you take a look at the contents of the cells by clicking on a cell and looking at the Formula Bar to see if the data is literal or computed. You may find that the display in one table is computed from the data in another table.
    Jerry

  • Clustor table in Query - SQ01

    Hi All
    I know that clustor tables can not be used in joins.
    Can any body please let me know how do I use data in table REGUP with joines. Also I want to know where can we use output of one infoset or SQ01 in other ??
    Thanks in advance
    Sameer

    HI All
    I could find how to join the clustor table in the SQ01. Use it as extra table , a select single statement is created which gives the desired result.
    Is there any procedure for giving points to self?????

  • Problem with saving duplicated tables in interactive form

    Hi,
    I have an interactive form that contain a table with a row that contain "insert remove move " object .
    when i press the add button, it duplicate the table, but if i save the PDF and then open it again, the extra table does not appear,
    it seems like it never been save.
    do you knoe what is the problem? why the tables are not saved properly?
    thanks, Noa

    Hi,
    Try doing the following
    try using the simple 'Button'. In the button's object properties, in the tab named 'field', select 'Control Type: submit'.
    Then, in the 'submit' tab in the object properties, choose PDF in the 'submit format' dropdown field.
    In the 'submit to URL field' type:
    mailto:nameataddress.com?subject=mySubject&body=Done
    You may need to adjust the e-mail address, subject and body text.
    Regards
    Ayyapparaj

  • Button created among region items generates a spurious table cell

    To reproduce:
    =============
    1. Create a text item X in an HTML region.
    2. Create a button B amongst region items, to appear after X and on the same line, new field.
    3. Run the page and look at the source. I would expect to see something like:
    <td>X</td><td>B</td>
    But instead I see
    <td>X</td><td align=right></td><td>B</td>
    This is messing up my item alignments and I can't get rid of the extra table cell. What's going on?

    Any ideas, anyone?

Maybe you are looking for