Extractor 2LIS_02_SCL and AFS-Contracts
Hi together,
we use in our AFS-system contracts with schedule-lines and
we need the contract-information in BW.
The extractor 2LIS_02_SCL don't extract this infomations.
Someone can help me.
Thank you in advance
Hi Roberto,
i have found my problem:
Report: LMCRSF01
Form: ANREICHERN_EKET
Tranfer Mengen/Werte zuweisen
CASE zeitp.
WHEN con_zeitp_bestellung. "Bestellung
xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-menge.
xmceket-bwgeoo = xmceket-menge * x_effw.
xmceket-bwgvo = xmceket-menge * x_vpom.
xmceket-bwgvp = xmceket-menge * x_vpmm.
WHEN con_zeitp_we_zu_best. " WE zur Bestellg
xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-wemng.
*... Only for valuated GR
IF xmcekpo-weunb IS INITIAL. "558508
xmceket-bwgvo = xmceket-wemng * x_vpom.
xmceket-bwgvp = xmceket-wemng * x_vpmm.
ENDIF.
xmceket-bwgeo = xmceket-wewrt.
WHEN con_zeitp_rechnung. "Rechnung
xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-remng.
xmceket-bwgeo = xmceket-rewrt.
WHEN con_zeitp_lieferplan. "Lieferplan
xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-menge.
xmceket-bwgeoo = xmceket-menge * x_epom.
xmceket-bwgvo = xmceket-menge * x_vpom. "Operat.: keine VP-
xmceket-bwgvp = xmceket-menge * x_vpmm. "Operat.: keine VP-E
WHEN OTHERS.
>> my comment : ignore inquiry and contract
Nicht verarbeitete Vorgänge: z.b. Anfrage, Kontrakt <
xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-menge. <
xmceket-bwgeoo = xmceket-menge * x_epom. <
xmceket-bwgvo = xmceket-menge * x_vpom. <
xmceket-bwgvp = xmceket-menge * x_vpmm. <
ENDCASE.
and i must solve this problem myself with
generic extractor EKET (Function module)
on the BW site consolidate item and schedule line in a new ODS
Thank's for trying to help me.
I hope the solution of this problem is helpful for someone
regards
thorsten
Similar Messages
-
Purcahsign data tables for the extractors 2lis_02_scl and 2lis_02_itm
Hi,
Can any one tell in which tables the purchasing data is stored in R/3
Thanks in Advance
DruHi........
EKKO >> Purchase document
EKPO >> Purchase document (item level)
EKPV >> Shipping-Specific Data on Stock Tfr. for Purch. Doc. Item
EINA >>Purchase info record (main data)
EINE >> Purchase info record (organizational data)
EBAN >> Purchase requisition
EBKN >> Purchase Requisition Account Assignment
T024 >> Purchasing Groups
EKET >> Scheduled lines
EKES >> Vendor confirmed lines
Regards,
Debjani...... -
2lis_02_scl and 2lis_02_itm
Hi developers,
I've activated the extractors 2lis_02_scl and 2lis_02_itm, when I do the initalitation in the setup tables I don't see any record also if in the execution log there are 7230 documents.
Any ideas to solve my problem?
Best Regards!Hi Roberto,
Thanks for your answer!
You have understood my problem! After the setup OLI3BW for MM-PUR in the table MC02M_0SCLSETUP and MC02M_0ITMSETUP there are not entry and in LBWE I've activated the extractors.
The Extractor LIS for area MM Stock and SD work perfectly.
The problem is only for 02MM! I've opened an OSS note but none answer!
Can you help me, plese?
Thanks a lot! -
2LIS_02_SCL and 2LIS_02_ITM missing records
Hi,
We have a problem with DS: 2LIS_02_SCL and 2LIS_02_ITM. We load data in 0PUR_C01 throu Bi content standard objects (0PUR_C01 2LIS_02_ITM / ...SCL). ... there seem to be problem with DS because In infocube 0PUR_C01 we don't get consigment records (consigment records - possition on PO). I have already checked DSs in RSA3 and those records are missing?
Any ideas?
JN.Hi,
are you sure you have PO's for your consignments? I would recommend to check the source tables EKKO, EKPO and EKET first. Once you are sure to have PO's there for consignments you can run RSA3 for the DS with the EBELN (PO Number) and confirm that the extractor does not extract them. One thing to watch out for the RSA3 does not pull from the delta queue but from the setup tables. So you need to make sure that the Consignment Document you are missing are the setup tables.
Hope that helps,
Michael
PS the extractor also pulls BSTYP Document Category K (Contracts) and L (Scheduling agreements)
Edited by: Michael S on Jul 14, 2009 12:20 PM -
Extractor 2LIS_02_SCL -- behaviour when ELIKZ is set
Dear BI-colleagues,
we are actually facing an issue with the standard extractor 2LIS_02_SCL - schedule line Level of purchase orders.
Our system setup:
The data of this extractor needs to be used to measure a supplier service sevel based upon single schedule lines. My predecessor actually changed the standard definition of this extractor in the System (which might be a reason for our issue?!).
In the BW-System, one standard staging DSO has been created with the folling key:
- PO document number
- PO document position
- PO document schedule line
- field BWVORG --> process key to distinguish between purchasing, goods receipt and invoice receipt data
Coming to the issue....
We are using the following fields to measure the (on time) Service Level:
SLFDT statistical delivery date = "to be" date
BUDAT booing date of GR / IR = "as is" date
--> whenever the BUDAT is higher than SLFDT, the delivery was not in time
In case a purchase order position has more than one schedule line, we get into trouble using this logic. When the final delivery indicator (field ELIKZ) is set on position level, there are update records passed to the BW for all schedule lines of this position showing as BUDAT the date when ELIKZ was set. Example:
Record Record date Sched. line SLFDT BUDAT Comment
1 01.04.2014 1 01.04.2014 01.04.2014 on time
2 10.04.2014 2 10.04.2014 10.04.2014 on time
3 15.04.2014 3 15.04.2014 15.04.2014 with this partial delivery the ELIKZ was set
4 15.04.2014 1 01.04.2014 15.04.2014 not in time
5 15.04.2014 2 10.04.2014 15.04.2014 due to record 3, a new BUDAT arrives for line 2 --> not in time
Unfortunately it's not as easy as e.g. just deleting incoming records having the same BUDAT as the last schedule line, as there are some intended processes which can lead to a later BUDAT (e.g. cancellations, corrections...)
Does anyone know if this is the Standard behaviour of this Extractor? How can I solve my issue?
Thank you in advance,
AndreDear Gajesh,
thank you for your remark.
Yes indeed the schedule line is in the key of the staging DSO. But as already said, the issue is that there are update records coming for ALL schedule lines whenever the ELIKZ is set on Position Level. From my Point of view the correct behaviour would be to deliver only update records for the last schedule line (the latest line). In my example the records 4 & 5 should never arrive in the BW system.
On BW side there are no modifications done for this Extractor.. the above mentioned examples are taken out of the PSA table, not from the DSO.
My requirement is either to stop transferring records 4 & 5 and/or to filter them somehow out in the BW-System, which is - from my point of view - almost impossible. I've already done a deep analysis of the incoming records in the PSA table and I couldn't find any way to separate these records from other, correct ones.
You said my example is not the standard behaviour... What would it be in this case (and how to restore standard)?
Thanks and best regards,
Andre -
How to extract User status for Sales and purchase contracts
Hello,
We need to load the User status linked to sales and purchase contract.
I think that there is no datasource in BI content.
What is the better solution ?
- Enhance a standard datasource like 2LIS_11_VASTH with a status field (This solution is not ok for Purchase contract)
- Create a spécific datasource to extract this status
- Others
Thanks for your help
Best regards
ChristopheHi,
In your scenario its better to use generic extractor to get the reqd data. This data can than be stored in a DSO on the BI side.
And you can look up for the user status using a routine .
Regards,
Rahul -
FULL is not FULL ? - extractor 2LIS_02_SCL
Hi Experts,
I have a problem with the loading from R/3 to BW regarding extractor 2LIS_02_SCL
Earlier we loaded the infoprovider in BW with DELTA but now we want to use FULL instead.
Theproblem is that our FULL load do not seems to get everything without filling a new SETUP
I have an exemple:
The FULL Load before filling a new SETUP shows a old Delivery Date, the user have change the date I ME38 in R/3 but
after filling a new SETUP the new date appears.
We have tested to set the InfoPackage to Repair Full Request but no difference.
Please help me to describe this and why FULL is not FULL.
Regards
KerstinHi,
The information I had was that you only use SETUP table when to make an INIT-load and that FULL loads is independent of the SETUP but as I understand from you guys is that LIS extractors have to have a new SETUP table when to make a new FULL also. Correct?
I don't want a daily full load of 2LIS_02_SCL, that was only an exemple
Regards
Kerstin -
Report for Qty Contract and Value Contract with PO release exceeding limits
Hi All,
Is there a std report in SAP that the users can use to view Qty and Val Contracts that has exceed in Qty (in case of Qty Contracts) or Val (in case of Val Contracts) ?
Thanks in advance!hi Duke,
If thinking logically, then there is no report for the same..this may be because you enter the qty or value limits in the contract doc itself....So, when you make the PO for the same, and if the qty or value exceeds the system automatically provides the message..stating that the qty or value has exceeded....
So, there is no report for the same...
Hope it helps...
Regards
Priyanka.P -
Creation of Sales Order and Service Contract from Inbound IDOC
Hi Experts,
My requirement is to create a Sales Order as well as a Service Contract from one Inbound IDOC. I am getting the Inbound IDOC from a third Party. The message type is ORDERS and Basic Type is ORDERS02. How ever i am using an extension type IDOC which carries all the required data for Sales Order and Service Contract. My requirement is like, to create a Sales Order first.
I have created a Z FM which is attached to the Process Code and subsequently to the message type. Inside the FM i an calling FM 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS' for creation of Sales Order. After that i am changing the IDOC data for the Document Type. I am changing the document type which is responsible for Contract Creation.
Then I am again calling the FM 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS' for creation of Contract with the help of IDOC data. But here the Contract is not getting created. It's getting failed during the Batch input session.
I need to solve this problem as soon as possible. Please help me. If there are any other options also please share.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
PriyabrataActually there is problem with BDCDATA. Inside the FM it's calling transaction with help of BDCDATA. If i am creating a Sales order or contract alone its creating successfully. But when i am trying to create both, it's retuning sy-subrc '1001' after calling the transaction on the second attempt. Is there any problem with BDCDATA like we can't handle with less time gap? Please help and give your inputs.
Regards,
Priyabrata -
I was given this address from the Apple customer support team.
I have an active existing iTunes store account and use the same Apple ID for signing into my iTunes Connect Account that distributes Apps.
I have created some books using the iBook author and in order to distribute content on the iBookstore I have been told electronically that I need a new Apple ID and password that is different to iTunes store account which I have already activated and completed contracts, tax information and bank information valid until 2013?
I want to create a Paid Books Account using the same email address, tax information and bank information. This has been most frustrating, as I cannot get passed the sign in section and there is no contact person I can speak to. I was of the understanding the iTunes connect account and the Developer programs which I paid good money for is all what I needed to be paid for selling iBooks on the iBookstore???
I only have one email address and wish to also use it for the Paid Books Account. I have books ready to be exported and published.
I am also having trouble locating and downloading iTunes Producer. I understand I need to have the Paid Books Account active to access the iTunes Producer program. Please help.
See additional information below:
What device did you use to connect to the store? Mac computer
Which operating system is installed? Mac OS X v10.7.x
What version of iTunes is installed on your computer? iTunes 10.6
Choose the iTunes Store or App Store for your country: Other
Please select your country: AustraliaHi Lrwill,
If the apps that are on your son's iPad were purchased under his Dad's Apple ID, then signing your Apple ID onto the iPad will not help you with updating those apps.
Also, if the iPad was sync'd with his Dad's iTunes library, then hooking it up to your computer/iTunes library, will require you to reset the iPad, and everything that was loaded under the other Library and Apple ID will be wiped out.
Can you provide a little more info about what was set up under which Apple ID and what iTunes library the iPad was sync'd with?
Cheers,
GB -
What is a table containing sales order and the contract it refers to
Hi,
I have a following problem (ECC6.0):
A sales order is created in VA03 and referenced to a contract. I need to locate the table or tables (or FM) which contains the information of the sales order number and the contract number.
Problem with VA03 is that I can see both numbers in the document flow screen; i.e. sales order (Doc.no) is xxxxx and the Preced.Doc field contains the contract number. However, this is only an ALV view. I cannot get anywhere from the program SAPMV75F.
I have checked table VBAK and it contains most of dat but not the link itself as it has any sales document. I need to have an entry containing the link between a given sales order (+item) and the contract.
Instead of creating with "Create with reference" and select Contract (which you need to refer to), the system is defined so that contract is used with a hierarchy customer. Debugging of creating did not help as the linking was conducted in the background without activation of debugging screen. I'm not an SD and no experience with contract.
Help is highly appreciated,
PipsaHi,
The field VBAK-GUEBG is used for valid from and valid to date,
you can find the Preceding and Subsequent sales and distribution document under table 'VBFA'.
under SMOD, you can find below exit use for Contract data modification:
V45W0001 Function module exit for copying sales header data into
items.
This enhancement contains the user exit:
- EXIT_SAPLV45W_001
regards
Vivek.
Edited by: Vievk Vardhan on Jan 29, 2010 3:13 PM -
Upgrade from CUCM 7.1.5 to 9.1 (No UCSS and ESW contract)
Hi,
we have CUCM 7.1.5 cluster (two servers) with no UCSS and ESW contract.
What would be the best and cheapest way to upgrade to CUCM 9.1.
We are planning to use our VMWare system and buy only CUCM 9.1 software (no servers).
Can the current DLU's be trensfered or do we have to buy everything from scratch.
Regards.For using Jabber mobile if you go with UCL - you wil need enhanced/enhanced plus. Or you can use CUWL std or pro both. Choose the licensing type based on your needs keeping in mind the future path of your organization. If you go UCL you will need to buy add on licenses for voicemail, webex etc. If you choose CUWL Professional for every user you buy one license - which enables them to use phone, voicemail, webex, jabber etc. Choose according to your needs, now is the time you can upgrade the licensing as you will benefit from discounted prices.
Below tables show the details:
Refer:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6882/ps9156/product_solution_overview0900aecd806cc7a4.pdf
Please rate all helpful posts and mark the thread as answered if this resolves your queries.
Terry -
Hi Gurus,
I am getting a short dump when i am trying to load the data from datasources: 2lis_02_scl and 2lis_02_itm.
It is giving the error message : "
"MESSAGE_TYPE_X" C
"SAPLRSC2" or "LRSC2U01"
"RSC2_QOUT_READ_DATA"
and even the repeat of delta has failed again.
Can ne body please help as this is business critical issue.
Thanks in advance,
Anurag RathoreHi
There is one other method where in youc an go to the Item and Schedule line tables ( EKET) and filter on created on and load those documents into BW.
However this is tedious process as you many have several documents to fill the setup tables
This is just another alternative..
Regards,
Srini -
Smartforms on Purschase Order and Purchasing Contracts in SRM system
Hi Friends,
Can anyone provide sample example of smartforms on Purchase Order and Purchsing Contracts in SRM system?
It is great, if you send me valuable material to create smartforms on PO and Purchase Contracts in SRM system.
Thanks in Adv.
BABAHello BABA,
Try this link. Hope this helps.
[Re: Creating SRM PO with Smartforms BBP_PO;
Please discuss this issues in SRM- General forum for better replies.
Cheers,
Suvendu -
Delta Loads for 2lis_02_scl and 2lis_02_itm
Hi Experts,
I am facing an issue, After initializing the setup tables and doing the init load for 2lis_02_scl and 2lis_02_itm whenever I do the delta loading for these two, all the dataload finish with green status and extracting 0 from 0 records.
I can see the queues for both these datasources in RSA7 in R/3, yet no record is extracted.
Any help will be appreciated.
Regards.Hi,
have a look into transaction smq1. there you should be able to see your extraction queues with the entry MCEX02 (or likewise)
Please schedule the program RMBWV302 and when this one is finished, start the deltapackage.
hth
cheers
sven
Maybe you are looking for
-
Non PO Invoice Workflow - Error while Posting Document
Hi Experts Hope I am posting this in the right forum as I am new to SDN! We have customized a multi-level non PO invoice workflow which triggers at the time of clicking 'Save as Completed' in tcode FV60. It has been configured to automatically post t
-
My laptop is about to die. Can I store my entire itunes library in icloud, then access it when I get a new computer?
-
IDOC error msg has to be populated in Souce system Ztable
Dear Forum, We had a following requirement. A sales order (ORDRSP) Idoc is being generated when ever the sales order is created in ECC 5.0 (Sender system) and the IDOC is being transferred via XI.Based on these inputs new purchase Order (PORDCR1) wil
-
I am trying to learn how to add and delete playlists. I have some libraries showing up on the left hand side of my i-tunes screen on my computer with duplicates and triplicates. How do I delete these.
-
'Save as' file shows blank code view until reopened
Odd behaviour that I have noticed just recently (say last week - so could be after the XMP updates to CS5). I have a large number of PHP pages within a development site, they reference headers and footers etc... If I carry out a 'Save as' procedure,