F-04 CLEARING ACCT

Hi Experts!
Good day!
When i'm using F-04 to clear acct 11200012, the error message below:
Consolidated companies ' ' and A201 are different
Message no. F5080
Diagnosis
The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two different companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
Procedure
If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.
Hope you can help me with this...
Thanks so much

Dear
Maria.
Please check that the document type you are using you have selected option Inter-Company postgs.
Simply double click on document type in OBA7 and check - if not flag it and try again.
When you make the transactions between intecompany or affilated company make sure you have flaged this option in for respective option.
Problems can arise in payment transactions if a vendor or a customer has changed its status, for example from a non-affiliated to an affiliated company. In the case of simultaneous payment of old and new items, there is therefore more than one trading partner assigned in the document. Similar problems can occur in the case of payments using several accounts. To make these postings possible, the document type must allow for the payment document to include different trading partners.
I hope this will help you to solve your issue. If you have any doubts feel free to share.
Regards,
Pankaj A Bhalerao.

Similar Messages

MIRO--CENVAT CLEARING ACCT NOT APPEARING.

Hi All,
In PO ,we are maintaining only JIPC ( cst ) for a tax code, But while GR we are capturing excise( cenavtable), now while doing MIRO cenvat clearing acct is not appearing when we simulate.
Is it prerequisit to maintain excise condition in PO so that cenvat clearing acct appears while doing MIRO?
Regards,
Manish

you need to maintain the excise conditions in the PO. What you can do is maintain the values eg. BED 16% and if you have different percentages or values of excise for different materials. Then the t.code FV11 allows you to maintain your condition on the basis of material, material plant and other combinations.
If this does not help then one more suggestion is to maintain a certain condition and percentage in the PO, and when you do the J1IEX capture you can manually go and change the values in the Excise Value tab. Try this and see what entries are passed after J1IEX posting. But this method would require manual intervention, i mean the value will ahve to be changed each time while capturing. and a mistake may cause problems.

Define Clearing Accts for Payment Diff. with Altern.Currency

Dear SAP Gurus,
Please suggest difference between Define Clearing Accts for Payment Diff. with Altern.Currency & Define Accounts for Payment Differences with Altern. Currency.
I am not able to understand what the use of defining Accounts for Payment Differences with Altern. Currency in two activities.
Early reply would be appreciated.
Regards,
Prafful kansal

Hi,
For this Scenario payment clearing is based on the exchange rate currencies for that purpose we configure that 2 setup accounts.
Briefly: If Invoice is raised as per date feb 1st (1 us dollar = 45 rupees)and payment received on that 1 mar ( 1 us dollar=40 Rupees)for this the exchage rate values are may be different for that purpose.
For this scenarios it will be loss or gain.
Hope you will understand.
Regards,
Kanike

Revenue: Gain and clearing acct

Hi,
I want to expose Gain from asset sale and clearing account revenue in Asset register (IT) - RAITAR01
When I execute ABAON transaction, the system use TTy (transaction type) 210-290 only on Acquisition account and Dep account for ordinary depreciation.
How to force using a transaction type into Gain from asset sale and clearing account revenue too? I need TTy to expose this value in the report with Asset History Sheet version, transaction OA79
Thanks
Regards

Hello Chinnu,
Error message F3029 is raised when the clearing account (T042I-VKONT)
is filled but the payment method in question is not defined as
"Bill/exchange".
I assume that the field is not changable at the moment. You may make
necessary changes (delete the entry or delete the specified account)
with the instructions below.
1. Go to Tcd: FBZP -> Push [Pmt methods in country]
2. Select the entry for the erroneous country(US?)/payment method
3. Change Payment method classification to 'Bill/ex' and save
Now you should be able to change "Set Up Bank Determination for Payment
Transactions" table.
Best Regards,
Gladys xing

GR/IR clearing account is being assigned to a acct assignment object

Hi there!
My key-user asked me a question which I really don't know how to answer. He asked me about the reason why in an accounting document automatically generated by MIRO the item which contains the GR/IR clearing acct is always assigned to an acct assignment object (such as WBS element or cost center).
I noticed that all the acct documents generated by MIRO has this mentioned assignment but, unfortunately I don't know why it happens yet.
That's I count on you to help me solving this issue I'm facing now.
Thanks in advance,
Rubens Luiz
SAP SCM Consultant
+55 21 2141 0033

Hello there!
A friend of mine told that it's not a problem at all. And that the reason that the cost object was assigned (or appeared) when you displayed FI accounting document is that since GR/IR Clearing Account is treated as the balance sheet account (I would assume it is the same in your system) and given the Profit Center was appearing in both P&L and Balance Sheet Account Report, SAP will have to use the cost object to derive the ultimate profit center.
Thanks in anyway!
Rubens Luiz
SCM Consultant

Message NA AU133 Account Clear rev sale to affil comp could not be found

I am trying to transfer assets from one company to another (Transaction ABT1N).
The above message tells me to "Enter this account in the account determination for Asset Accounting".
I cannot find this in the IMG. Can anyone advise please
Thanks

Hi, I have tried to assign a P&L acount to "account Clear revenue sale to affil. company" but the system gives me the following errors against existing field "clearing acct revenue from asset sale"! (which currently is a balance sheet account) and has worked successfully for years!
Error AC305 "Account xxxxx not allowed to be a balance sheet account" and Error AC306 "Account xxxxx not defined as a P&L account".
I have looked at other posts and it appear this is only a problem since 4.6. One post on the forum suggests a work around by changing the message status in OBA5 by setting WW against each message number. These settings already exist as Online "W" and Batchl "W".
Have you any ideas how I can get around this problem?

Transaction Codes used for clearing Open Items

Hi Gurus,
I want to know all the T.Codes used for clearing normal transactions and Open Items. Please tell me when to use which code (viz., while clearing vendors, customers, WH Tax, etc)
Your earliest reply will be of great help. and naturally i will award you
Thank you

Hi,
F-03     Clear G/L Account
F-04     Post with Clearing
F-30     Post with Clearing
F-32     Clear Customer
F-39     Clear Customer Down Payment
F-44     Clear Vendor
F-51     Post with Clearing
F-54     Clear Vendor Down Payment
F-91     Asset Acquis. Posted w/Clearing Acct
F.13     Automatic Clearing without Currency
F.19     G/L: Goods/Invoice Received Clearing
F13E     Automatic Clearing With Currency
F13L     Autom. Clearing Spec. to Ledger Grp
Regards,
Eli

Impact of not having bank clearing account?

My client doesn't want to use bank clearing account and wants to directly cr or dr the main bank account whenever a payment is received or made. Could you guys tell me what will be the impact of this, as I see reconciliation might be an issue.

Avinya,
The best solution is to seperate the AP and AR process. The reason i am mentioning this is for better reconciliation process.
According to that, you would have an account 1 for AR i.e deposits(including Wire Ins) and then accounts 2(Wire Outs) and 3 for Check outs.
It's better ( recommended) to have a clearing acct while making payments, so that you have an idea of how much is the outstanding balance. If not, the whole of reconciliation process gets a little complicated - The outstanding balance can still be found out, but as i said, lot of calculations need to be done.
Hope that helps..
Thanks,
Nandita

F.13 Automatic Clearing for cenavt clearing account

I want to do automatic clearing (f.13) for Cenvat Clearing Account
I have maintained EBELN as a criteria in OB74 & for Cenvat clearing G.L.Account Sort key as 14 (Purchase Order)
If I dsiplay Cenvat Clearing Acct, for Document Type ED system display's the P.O. Number as Purchasing Doc; But for RE document system does not display P.O. Number & Auto clearing does not happen
Can you any one guide how to clear this cenvat clearing account automatically
Regards
Sandeep

Hi,
is your GL account defined as 'Automatic postings' by FS00? Please, check and remake your process.
Regards

Clearing documents with no document currency

Have a balance on a acct that is to be written off. Balance only appears on acct as when document currencies is *. When creating GL entry to clear acct we end up with a balance on the acct in whatever currency was used in the clearing document.
The reason this is a problem is that the balance created by the clearing document is appearing on monthly financials under the currency that is used in the clearing document.

Hi Umesh,
Select 'Display Currency' button
Choose Local currency radiobutton and click Enter.
Let me know if it worked.....
Deepthi.

PGI-No Accounts maintained for company code clearing between company codes

Dear Expetrs,
When i am doing PGI getting error that is no accts maintained for company code clearing between 0010 to 0035. This is intercompany process. In our intercompany company codes is 0010 and 0020. So we maintained already clearing acconuts between 0010 and 0020 in OBYA. But when am doing post goods issue... getting error no accts maintained between 0010 to 0035. Actually here supposed to take clearing accts between 0010 to 0020. I couldnt understand why its taking 0010 to 0035. Could you please suggest me where i did mistake, Please suggest me ASAP.
Tanks & Regards,
VS

Dear Lakshmipathi,
Here am pasted the OBYA Screen...whatever i maintain pls check and suggest me. i am suspecting on Debit posting kes and credit posting keys maintain as 01 and 31 is corect.
Transaction          BUV   Clearing between company codes
Posted in             0016
Cleared against       0013
Debit posting key    01                  Credit posting key   31
Account debit        7790000013          Account credit       7720000013
Posted in             0013
Cleared against       0016
Debit posting key    01                  Credit posting key   31
Account debit        7790000016          Account credit       7720000016
Thanks & Regards,
Vasu

PowerShell - Bulk Clear-ADAccountExpiration

Error Message: Cannot Validate argument on parameter 'Identify'. The argument is null. Csv filesamAccountNameTst_Posh1Tst_Posh2Import-Module ActiveDirectory
$count = 0
$UserId = Import-Csv c:\temp\Clear-Acct-Exp-Date.csv
$out = "Findings `r`n" #File Heading
ForEach($Item in $UserId)
$count++
Clear-ADAccountExpiration -Identity $Item.samAccountName
Write-Host $Item.samAccountName ":" $count
$Out += $Item.samAccountName + ":" + $count + " `r`n"
$out | Out-File c:\temp\Clear-Acct-Exp-Date.txt
mamadukes

Hi,
According to the error, you're using -Identify somewhere instead of -Identity.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee617213.aspx
Don't retire TechNet! -
(Don't give up yet - 12,950+ strong and growing)

Accting error while MIRO

Hi ASAP Guru,
while doing MIRO for delivery cost component for transporter where only service tax with ED & HiED is only applicable,
while doing MIRO following FI entry is getting generated
1 K 2003000 N.N. & BROTHERS 677,680.10- INR
2 S 2023000 Freight Provision-     535,124.10 INR
3 S 4620100CENVATABLESERVICE64,215.00INR
4 S 4620200 CENVATABLE EDU.    1,284.00INR
5 S 4620201 CENVATABLE HIGH 642.00 INR
6 S 2205000 CENVAT clearing       74,917.00INR
7 S 2205000 CENVAT clearing       1,498.00      INR
where system has to generate following FI entry
1 K 2003000 N.N. & BROTHERS 677,680.10- INR
2 S 2023000 Freight Provision-     535,124.10 INR
3 S 4620100CENVATABLE SERVICE64,215.00INR
4 S 4620200 CENVATABLE EDU.    1,284.00INR
5 S 4620201 CENVATABLE HIGH 642.00 INR
please let me know where the problem is and what correction to be taken.
With Regards
Manoj Singh

Hi ASAP Guru,
This is the business procedure my client has adopted
This is Open PO, where Raw Mat is Supply by one party and transportation support one party, here both party payment will take place as per supply of mat. & Service.
In PO, in condition tab, freight condition type is maintained and freight vendor master has been assigned with freight cond. type.
At the time of GR with Excise cap/post,
Mat. Value will be posted to Stk Acct, Freight cost will be posted to Freight Acct and Offsetting to GR/IR.
BED/ED/HiCEss debit and cenvatable clearing is getting credit.
At IV level, two invoices will be generated one for material supplier and one for transporter vendor
->For Material supplier vendor with option Goods/ Services
Vendor Acct will credit and GR/IR provision and excise cenvatable is getting debit.
->For transporter Vendor with option planned delivery cost
Freight cost will be credit to freight vendor Acct. and freight provision and + Service tax Acct ( 1221) has to be debit.
System is picking up Vendor Acct + GR/IR acct + Service tax Acct (1221) along with unwanted CENVAT Clearing Acct. when I am trying to create invoice for Freight component.
Whereas system has to generate only Vendor Acct + GR/IR acct + Service tax Acct (1221) component.
I am not finding any problem with TAX code, in other cases tax code is working fine but in this also I am using the same tax code.
Now I believe that case is clear, please guide me to resolve this error,
With Worm Regards
Manoj singh

Account postings in GR & IR for Subcontracting

Hi Experts,
I need to know the account postings for both GR & IR during Sub contracting.
Let us take the scenario . .
PO price - 1000(Gross) + 200(Tax) = 1200 (Net) for 1 Qty
GR - PO Net Price due to Moving Average price.
IR - 1200(Gross) + 240 (Tax) = 1440
Please explain the accounting entries during Goods Receipt and Invoice Receipt.
By
Prabhu

If Material has Price Control as "V" (MAP)
(BSX) Stock A/c of Assembly - Dr
(BSV) Change in Subcon Stock - Cr
(FRL) Subcontracting Charges - Dr
(WRX) GR/IR Clearing A/c - Cr
(BSX) Stock A/c of Components - Cr
(GBB-VBO) Consumption A/c of Components - Dr
If Material has Price Control as "S" (Std. Price)
If Material is having Price Control as "S" then Price Difference A/c will also in picture.
This depends on configuration; SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Goods Receipt > Price Differences for Subcontract Orders at Goods Receipt
Price Differences for Subcontract Orders at Goods Receipt
In this step, you configure for each valuation area whether price differences are generated for a Subcontract order at the time of a goods receipt if the manufactured material is managed at standard price and the standard price varies from the receipt value (externally performed service + value of components + delivery costs).
Example
Finished product: $400 (value at standard price)
Subcontract order:
o Ext. service : $250
o Components : $100
Posting schema without price differences:
Stock account FERT : 400 +
Stock change : 400 -
GR/IR clearing acct : 250 -
External service acct : 250 +
Compon. stock account : 100 -
Consumption account : 100 +
Posting schema with price differences:
Stock account FERT : 400 +
Stock change : 350 -
Price difference : 50 -
GR/IR clearing acct : 250 -
External service acct : 250 +
Compon. stock account : 100 -
Consumption account : 100 +
hope it help

GR/IR behaviour in PSM (FM) with update in both GR/IR

Hello Gurus,
I'd like to ask which is the correct behaviour in PSM when Updating in both GR/IR (in OFUP transaction).
I'm getting the following behaviour from the system:
Goods receipt:
FI document:............... =>......PSM Document:
Expense acct E 100...............Funds ctr AAA /Comm Item AAA   100 (from expense acct E)
Clearing acct     -100
Invoice Receipt:
FI document................ =>.....PSM Document:
Clearing acct        100................Funds ctr AAA/ Comm Item AAA   -100 (inheriting expense acct E)
Supplier acct       -100................Funds ctr AAA /Comm Item AAA    100 (from clearing account)
If you analyze this from PSM perspective its correct, because the impact in Funds ctr AAA/ Comm item AAA is 100, but when comparing it to controlling real items, there is a difference due to the fact that the expense account E would have a balance of 100 in controlling and 0 in PSM.
Is this correct anyway?
Thanx a lot!!

Hello Mariano,
The mapping should be:
Expense account (say, the gl code is 3999999) -> cost element 3999999 -> CI 3999999 30/3 (derived through any desired method)
Clearing account (say, the gl code is 1999999) -> CI 1999999 40/3
Vendor reconciliation accout (say, the gl code is 2999999) -> CI 2999999 60/3
When a PO is created the system derives the FM account assignment for the PO line item. In the above case CI 3999999 will be derived through cost element and a funds center will be derived through a CO object (cost center, internal order, etc).
During IR process, the system bypasses the derivation mechanism. Instead, the account assignment is inherited from the PO line. So, you should get DR 3999999 and CR 3999999 in FM for the LIV postings.
Hope this clarifies the matter.
Regards,
Ming

F-04 CLEARING ACCT

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for