F110 hitlist on ECC6.0 for rundate

Hi,
my customer recently switched to ECC6.0. When you now start transaction F110 (payment prog) and execute the possible entries on the run date, the system shows a list of all payment id. Since we have more then 5000 SAp provides a pop-up message that only the first 5000 hits are shown. The process of seeing this list takes quite some time for 5000 entries and thus the performace is the issue. Now I think we can delete old logs so that the list is smaller when doing a possible entries (where?), but is there a way to config that only 500 hits or 100 hits are shown instead of the full list when doing the possible entries on thr run date field.
Thanks!

Can anybody help on a related Problem with regard to F110;
When we generate the list of Payment runs, it does not give which Company Code has generated that run; We have about 110 Company Codes; It would be ideal if we can have Company Code & user name and also the facility to filter based on Company Codes;
Can this be achieved in F110 itself or is there any other place where we can get this info;
Regards
Siddique

Similar Messages

Feature in ERP 2005/ECC6 for MM & SRM

Dear all
Kindly let me know the link for Feature available in ERP 2005/ECC6 for MM & SRM
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Hi
check following
/thread/170347 [original link is broken]
The only difference between ECC5 and ECC6 is that additional components like mySAPCRM, mySAPPLM, mySAPSCM, mySAPSRM are added in ECC6.0. HR was already a part of ECC5.0.
http://abdurohman.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/whats-new-in-ecc5-and-ecc6-ecc7/
http://service.sap.com/instguides.
Vishal...

T code in ECC6 for SE49 in 4.6B

Please provide me t code in ecc6 for t code se49 which exists in 4.6B

Hi,
Refer this link
SE 48/SE49 new tranaction code
Regards,Sheetal

Whats the relevant FM in ECC6 for following FM of 4.6c

Hi Abapers,
Could anyone tell me, whats the relevant FM in ECC6 for following FM of 4.6c:
BBP_GET_ATTRIBUTES
COM_OM_ORGOBJECT_TEXTS_GET
SWW_WI_TO_OBJECT_FIND

Dear Aravind,
http://service.sap.com/erp
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.6 b Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
Select the Solution Area like Financials, Human Capital Management, Sales....
Select module like MM, PP, SD, QM.....
Click on Search
Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
and also check the release notes of ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Rakesh

Runtime Error in ECC6 - for t-code PPOCE

HI Gurus!
at my client site , we have upgraded 4.7 to ECC6. Now functional consultants are testing the system.When HR consultant working on PPOCE t-code ,the patch no of SAP HR - 0007. its giving runtime error.
Runtime Errors CREATE_DATA_UNKNOWN_TYPE
Except.     CX_SY_CREATE_DATA_ERROR          Date and Time                    19.08.2008     14:42:44
Short text
CREATE DATA: The specified type "HRP1680" is no valid data type.
What happened?
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "SAPLRHDB" had to be terminated because it has come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis :An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_CREATE_DATA_ERROR', was not caught in
procedure "FILL_I777D" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
The dynamically specified type "HRP1680" at CREATE DATA is no valid data type.
The type is either unknown or an object type.
Missing RAISING Clause in Interface
Program     SAPLRHDB
Include     LRHDBF00
Row     177
Module type (FORM)
Module Name FILL_I777D
Trigger Location of Exception
Program     SAPLRHDB
Include     LRHDBF00
Row     308
Module type(FORM)
Module Name     FILL_I777D
Source Code Extract
Line          SourceCde
278          **                HEADER   = FI_HEADER                    "ANDBCEK008264
279          **           TABLES                                       "ANDBCEK008264
280          **                FIELDTAB = FI_TAB                       "ANDBCEK008264
281          **           EXCEPTIONS                                   "ANDBCEK008264
282          **                OTHERS   = 4.                           "ANDBCEK008264
283          *                                                         "ANDBCEK008264
284          *      CALL FUNCTION 'DDIF_FIELDINFO_GET'                 "ANDBCEK008264
285          *           EXPORTING                                     "ANDBCEK008264
286          *                tabname        = fi_tabname              "ANDBCEK008264
287          **               FIELDNAME      = ' '                     "ANDBCEK008264
288          **               LANGU          = SY-LANGU                "ANDBCEK008264
289          **               LFIELDNAME     = ' '                     "ANDBCEK008264
290          **               ALL_TYPES      = ' '                     "ANDBCEK008264
291          *           IMPORTING                                     "ANDBCEK008264
292          *                x030l_wa       = fi_header               "ANDBCEK008264
293          **               DDOBJTYPE      =                         "ANDBCEK008264
294          **               DFIES_WA       =                         "ANDBCEK008264
295          **          TABLES                                        "ANDBCEK008264
296          **               DFIES_TAB      =                         "ANDBCEK008264
297          *          EXCEPTIONS                                     "ANDBCEK008264
298          *               not_found      = 1                        "ANDBCEK008264
299          *               internal_error = 2                        "ANDBCEK008264
300          *               OTHERS         = 3.                       "ANDBCEK008264
301          *
302          *      IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
303          *        i777d-tbtab_tabof = fi_header-tablen - tabnr_intlen.
304          *        i777d-pnnnn_tabof = i777d-tbtab_tabof - 8.
305          *      ENDIF.
306
307          *      ASSIGN char TO <any_field> CASTING TYPE (fi_tabname). "ANDDDIF
>>>>>                create data anyfield type (fi_tabname).                "ANDUNI
309                assign anyfield->* to <any_field>.                     "ANDUNI
310
311          *     we need a character view of <any_field> !!!            "ANDUNI
312                assign <any_field> to <char_field> casting type c.     "ANDUNI
313
314          *      DESCRIBE FIELD <any_field> LENGTH tablength            "ANDDDIF
315          *                                 IN BYTE MODE.               "ANDDDIF
316
317                DESCRIBE FIELD <char_field> LENGTH tablength           "ANDUNI
318                                            IN CHARACTER MODE.         "ANDUNI
319
320                <i777d>-tbtab_tabof = tablength - tabnr_intlen.        "ANDDDIF
321                <i777d>-pnnnn_tabof = <i777d>-tbtab_tabof - 8.         "ANDDDIF
322
323             ENDIF.
324              IF <i777d>-ext_infty NE space.                             "VWMEXT
325                READ TABLE i77id
326                     WITH KEY infty = <i777d>-infty
327                     BINARY SEARCH.

Hi Ramesh,
i have check the table HRP1680 in SAP4.7c but in ECC 6 it is not there. So i have create that table. Is it Info-type? or i have apply OSS notes.
regards
Rahul

F110 Payment run authorisation for release of funds

Hi All,
we are in the process of streamlining our SAP banking process with Westpac's integrated banking system.
Specifically the AP and payroll process. Under the current system we upload the payment file to their online system and we then have two signatories who sign in and authorise the release of funds online.
Under the new process, we want to remove any manual handling of the payment files. It is assumed that the authorisation for the release of funds is done in SAP and there is no online signature for the release of the funds.
The only way i can think of to do this is by controlling access the payment run process and have our signatories process one element of the payment run each I.e.
1)    AP clerk creates the payment proposal
2)    Signatory 1 executes the payment proposal
3)    Signatory 2 Executes the print of the payment run (this stage produces our output file which is sent directly to the bank)
However, this seems a little clunky and our signatories are not necessarily SAP users. does anyone have suggestions for a more elegant solutions to this?
many thanks
Phil.

Please work with you Security Team. The solution for this is:
1. Create Three differenet Roles
For Scenario 1) AP clerk creates the payment proposal
Solution. Give in Role 1
Key        Action
02         Edit parameters
03         Display parameters
For Scenario 2) Signatory 1 executes the payment proposal
Solution. Give in Role 2
11         Execute proposal
12         Edit proposal
13         Display proposal
14         Delete proposal
15         Create payment medium proposal
For Scenario 3) Signatory 2 Executes the print of the payment run (this stage produces our output file which is sent directly to the bank)
Solution. Give in Role 3
21         Execute payment run
23         Display payment run
24         Delete payment run payment data
25         Create payment media of payment run
26         Delete payment orders of payment run
31         Print payment medium manually
to See the above option follow the below path:
T-Code F110>Enviornemnt>Authorization
Hope this helps.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Vivek Srivastava

F110 - Many Check no for multiple pages

Dear Sapients,
I have some issue with Automatic Payment Program using F110. We are using Non-Preprinted stationary with un-numbered checks, but system is assigning check no for each pages, if there are multiple pages for same vendor. Here is scanerio in more details:-
1. Configuartion for F110 is done. Payment Method "C" is our payment method configured. All configuration is done and looks good.
2. We have assigned FORM - /SMB11/CHECK_UNN, which is SAP standard form.
3. We are using RFFOUS_C program for printing, which SAP allowed to use this print program for both pre-printing and non-pre-printed stationary for Check.
4. When we execute program for vendor payment and vendor have say 50-60 invoices, system generate proposal correct, and post the document in payment run, but when we execute print for check printing, we check the spool request, it assign check number on each page. say it have 4 pages.
(a) On page 1, check no would be say 2001 and it will VOID the check
(b) On page 2, check no would be say 2002 and it will VOID the check
(c) On page 3, check no would be say 2003 and it will print the check correctly.
(d) On page 4, check no would be say 2004 and it will VOID the check, This is summary page. ON summary page, it also give the check no details that from 2001 to 2004 check are assigned for this payment and check registered is updated properly.
It should only assign one check no 2001 and shoudl only print the check on last page.
Please advice.
Thanks,
Pawan Sharma

Finally found the issue. In fact, we need to select "Do Not VOID any Check" in variant of program RFFOUS_C.
For More Details, please read help for this check mark. It resovled my problem.
If anyone have same issue, please use same process.
Thanks,
Pawan

Business Area not populated for F110 but it works for FBZ2

Hi all Gurus,
I have marked my co code in OBY6 for Business Area Financial Statement. In GL a/c, I also marked the FSG to be "Required" field. For posting key field status, it set to "Optional"
During F110 auto payment run, the Business Area field was blank and without any update.
But if I perform the same for manual pymt posting via FBZ2, Business Area is mandatory field.
Please help to undertand the logic.
Regards
jloh

hi
use substitution for business area.

F110 - One payment document for numerous vendors

Hi,
I know it is possible to create in F110 one document for all payments for one vendor.
Recently I was askedy by Finance to allow to create in F110 one document that combines payments all vendors open items that have the same payment method. I have never had such requirement before.
Is it possible and if yes how can I set it up?
Many thanks,
Karol

Hi,
The requirement is not feasible practically, as if you create only one payment document for all vendors with same payment method, how will you pass on the payment data to bank for making payment to different vendors. (as each vendor would be having different bank details.)
In case you do not want to pass on the payment data to bank, and just want to make posting in FI for payment, then you can link all the vendors to a head office vendor (Head Office - Branch Concept) and can then make a single payment document for all the vendors linked to the main vendor.
Regards,
Gaurav

F110 Error-Pymt Methods for This Run Not Specified in Master Record

Hi,
I have encountered an issue where the payment program will not determine the payment method correctly. We have several company codes assigned to a single paying company code. We do not enter a payment method on the invoice. The payment method is determined from the vendor master during the execution of F110. We have two different payment methods C and A. The vendor is extended to multiple company codes and each company code can choose either payment method A or C.
Following is an example:
CoCd     Vendor PM
1000     123         C (paying company code)
2000     123         C
3000     123         A
4000     123         A
If I execute F110 for payment method C, for vendor 123 and only include company codes 1000 and 2000, the payment program includes the invoices for payment as expected. The same is true for payment method A with company codes 3000 and 4000.
We are trying to move towards a centralized AP payment run. However, if I execute F110 for payment method C, for vendor 123 for all company codes (1000, 2000, 3000, 4000), the payment program has ALL the invoices set to exceptions. If I review the Additional Log for Pmnt Method Selection if Not Successful it states: "None of the pmnt meths "C" has been entered in mast.rec.or in doc." Message No. FZ605. I would expect SAP to include the invoices from company code 1000 and 2000 for payment and the invoices from company codes 3000 and 4000 as exceptions because the payment method does not exist in the invoice or the master record.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to resolve this issue? Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sue

Hi
Friends,
Check the Config FBZP properly
1. Payment mentd in country-C (Check) select details button check whether this is maintained
Select checkl box-Street PO, Box, pst code. in required master data specification Tab
RFFOU_C
LISTIS
2. Payment methd in company code-A (ACH) select details button check whether this is maintained
select check box Bank details required master data specification Tab
RFFOEDI1
LIST1S
3. XK01 - Give Payment methd (AC) and also give Bank details in payment transaction tab.
4.F110- Give payment metnd A or C depends upon your requirement.
Go to SE11-PAYR, SE38-RFFOUS_C-----Check
Goto SE38-RFFOEDI1----ACH
Anil

F110 - several bank accounts for the vendor,which one is retrieved by SAP?

Hi gurus,
When using data medium exchange in transaction F110 for a customer (or a vendor) that has several bank accounts in the customer (vendor) master record, which one amongst those accounts will be retrieved by the system ?
Ronan
Edited by: Ronan LEGUELLEC on Nov 20, 2008 3:58 PM

Each bank in vendor master is linked to Partner Bank Type (BnkT) field. One of these values is entered in header (Payment tab), while entering vendor invoice in the system. APP picks the bank (in vendor master record) linked to the partner bank type key entered in the vendor invoice.

F110 - An email ID for remittance to vendors?

When payment is done through F110, an email should go to the vendor with the payment details
We have a requirement currently to send emails to vendors. I have searched in the forum got enough answers, still I have few more questions regarding the setup .
1. we are currently using classic payment medium and program RFFODEI1 to send the ACH payments to the bank.
Payment file using is DME
Anil
Edited by: Anil Kumar on Dec 14, 2011 8:48 AM

These are steps you need to carry out to send email.
Emailing SAP Remittance advice:
1.
For the following process to work SAP Connect needs to be configured for outgoing mail. This is carried out by the Basis team. The t-code is SCOT.
2.
Vendor Master Data
Define ‘Std communication method’ as SMTP (Internet mail) and maintain an email address in the vendor master data.
3.
T-Code BERP – Code to find the relevant BTE. Use the Selection Attribute to browse for your business area. In my case, it is AP-Payment Transactions hence FI-AP-AP-PT.
00002040 is the relevant process. This is a Function called SAMPLE_PROCESS_00002040. In this case, the FM only checks for an email address in the Vendor Master. If more logic is required a Z-version would need to be created.
4.
Use t-code FIBF to create the enhancement.
a)
Create a product.
A product groups together customer enhancements to BTE’s developed in the customer's namespace. All customer enhancements assigned to a certain customer product can be released with the Activate Customer Product indicator. The OPEN_FI function module for a certain customer enhancement cannot find the corresponding customer function modules, until this has been done.
Create the product name (for example ZMAIL) and make it active.
FIBF->Settings->Products->…of a Customer
b)
Assign the BTE to the FM:
Settings->Process Modules->…of a customer
Assign the 00002040 process to the FM and Product.
5.
At the end of this process when the payment advice program is run, the event will be called and it will automatically send an email to the vendor.
6.
Assign an email address to the sap user who will be the outgoing accounting clerk. Define the Accounting Clerk for the outgoing email address:
SPRO->FI->AR/AP->Vendor Accounts->Master Data->Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data->Define Accounting Clerks
Thanks.
Irene

Recommended upgrade method from ECC5 to ECC6 for lowest production downtime

Hello everybody,
I've been looking through multiple documents concerning a system upgrade and I am still unable to figure out the recommended method for upgrading a system with minimum downtime.
My scenario requires that tests as rigid as possible will be performed and that development will be halted for the shortest time possible , therefore development must be continued after the initial upgrade.
We are currently debating the required way to do this - what should be done with the change requests that currently reside in the DEV system, in which steps the incomptabilities are fixed and so on.
I've decided that I'll share my thoughts with you and maybe you guros will be able to point out mistakes in the methodology.
1. ECC 5 Production System is copied aside, lets call this system EPC
2. Change requests from DEV ECC5 are copied to this EPC System.
3. EPC system is upgraded to ECC6.
4. Bugs and incomptabilities such as unicode incomptabilities are fixed and merged in a change request
This ends the preperation step and in my opinion is sort of a preperation step.
During the whole preparation step, which to my estimate could take at least one month, development in the original system must be continued, so this is my main trouble.
What is the recommended procedure from here?
I assume that another production must be done on the day of the actual upgrade start, then the fixes from the previous preperation system are copied to this actual ECC6 Production, but I am rather lost as far as it goes to having an ECC6 Dev with most current change requests.
I would appreciate any hints and help,
thanks in advance,
Eli.

Ok, your idea of having a production copy for development and tests is a good upgrade strategy, we have done this twice due high quantity of developments and configuragion changes but I don´t see why you wrote " copy change requests from DEV to EPC " your whole configuration, programs, etc, are already in EPC once you copy the system.
In this scenario every change made in DEV ECC 5.0 must be also replicated and tested in EPC 6.0 because you cannot use the change requests from 5.0 in 6.0 once in productive upgrade, let me list the global steps:
1.- Homogeneous system copy from PRD to EPC, you will get a working test platform
2.- Upgrade EPC to 6.0
3.- Developers and functionals will do all respective changes and generate chage requests.
Once EPC is ready
4.- Upgrade DEV system to 6.0 transport change requests created in EPC to upgraded DEV, from this point you should only do emergency changes using Q&A system.
5.- Upgrade Q&A system, transport change requests from DEV, no changes are permited from now until PRD is upgraded.
6.- Do all tests very carefully
7.- Upgrade PRD transport change requests
Then you are ready. the downtime can be tune trough EPC, DEV and Q&A systems so you can determine what you shoud do to assure the shortest method.
I recomend you to use the downtime minimized upgrade method and from every upgrade take a deep look at the upgrade report generated after the whole process is completed.

IDOC Problem From 46C To ECC6 For ORDERS05

Hello
I am trying to generate 46C version ORDERS05 basic type from ECC6 700 version.
Within WE20(Partner Profiles) I have set the Seg. release in IDOC type to 46C to generate the old 46C segment. When I run my test again the IDOC that was generated is still version 700.
Thanks for the help.
Joe

Gentlemen:
The problem around this statement:
ASSIGN (w_field) TO <fs_field>
is explained as follows:
1. In ABAP language, there are two ways for assigning a new value to a field-symbol.
- Sentence: ASSIGN (values) TO <my_field_symbol>.
In this case, the <my_field_symbol> receives from (w_field) the data type and value content of this variable. So, we keep that a FSymbol is assigned and, at the same time, receives an initial value.
- Sentence: <my_field_symbol> = '/' or <my_field_symbol> = my_var.
In this way, we only pass the content of the variable next to = sign. But before this, the field-symbol must had been assigned (using ASSIGN statement), in another case, the compiler raises an exception.
Following the example of Federico... I think he tried to assign a field like this (please, supose the program imports the structure of a database table with a standard function, into a internal table which is looped by the work area w_field ):
- If w_field contains 'BKPF-WERKS', so sentence ASSIGN will affect the field symbol, passing to this the data type and current content of table field BKPF-WERKS.
- If w_field contains 'BKPF-.INCLUDE': *the column .INCLUDE obviously is not associated with a data type... so our statement ASSIGN... TO... never pass any data type or value to our field-symbol. So that, this field is never initialized properly, and when inmmediately you try to execute something like this: <my_field_symbol> = '/', the game (program) is over.. XD
I hope this post was helpful for anyone...
Best Regards!!
RRG
ABAPer(u) - EVOLution

I want to update enhancement category in ECC6 for Z-Table

Hi,
I am working in Upgrade project from 4.5B to ECC6. In Ecc6 I want to update Enhancement category for Z-Table but this facility is not avilable in 4.5B.
Unless updating enhancement category for Z-Table then it is throughing runtime error.
But Z-Table has some datas. My question is if update enhancement category and save and activate this Z-Table then is there any problem affect to that table data.
Or any other problem will be arised ?
Waiting for quick response.
Best Regards,
Padhy

Not to Worry Dear.. enhancement catagory is like u want urr table to be enhanceable (i.e the no of fields can be increase , decrease or edited)
so its just an catagory setting or configuration like do you want to allow others to change fields setting in your table.
so actual proble may occur when u add, remove or edit fields list. (ofcourse when you have made it enhanceable)
so if there is possability of data truncation then u will get error and you have to go to SE14 for Table adjustment
No Rewards Plz..

F110 hitlist on ECC6.0 for rundate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for