F110 not picking up documents for payment

Hi Gurus,
When we run payment proposal, few lines are not getting selected for payment.
Only first line item is getting selected , remaining are ignored.
Payment method is same for all. there is no payment blocks.
pl advice what other points to check..?
rgds
neha

payment method same
no payment block
immediate payment terms for all
all documents with document date, posting date and amount same.
Only document number different.
Only first doc selected in payment proposal rest ignored.
if i go to addl selection criteria and put any other document number alone, then it is getting selected.
meaning at a time only 1 line selcted for payment.
is there any such restriction which can be set for F110..?
thanks
neha

Similar Messages

  • Single Document  for Payment in F110

    Hi
    When making payment to Vendor (Employee) through F110, system is posting document for each vendor items.
    ex:  Vendor 1  10dr  Bank  10cr     document no: 1000001
           Vendor 2  20dr  bank 20 Cr    Document No:1000002.
    But i need to post single document  for bank account ie
    Vendor 1  10dr
    vendor 2   20 Dr
    Bank a/c               30 cr    Document No; 1000001 (is required)
    How to do this??  Any favorable answer is expected urgently.
    Regards
    saikrishnan.kk
    Mail id: [email protected]

    Hi,
    I have tried this with different examples.But system makes the payment in two different documents.I think it's not posible making payment in single document.
    If I am wrong, Please do correct me.
    If it is useful assign points.
    Regards,
    Kumar.D

  • Manual BRS system not picking the doc for clearing the payment

    While processing Manual bank statement if i am  using referance doc no system not picking doc no for clearing the bank payment. So that after finishing BRs I am matching the doc manually, in f-04. This is taking long time for processing. Anyone can tell me why ref doc no not working and to make it to work, or else any problem is there to use the field. please solve my query.
    Edited by: MANISFICO1 on Aug 1, 2011 11:49 AM

    Hi:
           Please follow as given and hopefully you will be able to resolve the issue.
    1...Go to SPRO...Financial Accounting....Bank...Business transactions...Payment Transactions...Manual Bank Statement..Create a new transaction with sign - and do not assign anything in posting rule for now and enter 15 in Algorithm field , save.
    2...In define posting keys and posting rules...create an account symbol for the one you did in step 1..In Assign account to account symbol please use account symbol created earlier and acc mode + and currency should be + too. In GL Account area please list the outgoing GL which you are using for outgoing postings..
    In create key for posting rule define a posting rule and now go back to step 1 and assign the posting rule you created to the transaction type
    In define posting rules please maintain posting rule as define above...in posting area assign 1. give nothing in first posting key.assign account symbol as created earlier...now give give posting key 50..give account credit Bank...and a suitable document you use for posting BRS...In posting type give 4.
    Your Manual Bank statement is ready ....
    Go to FS00 select your bank outgoing GL account there and in create/bank.interest tab double click on Field status group..in general data make assignment number mandatory for posting...
    Go to FB50....post and outgoing transaction using the GL given above it will require you to enter assignment number enter 123 and post.
    In FF67 Select the new statement , proceed with your normal data entry and give the transaction you created in above , enter value date, amount and in bank ref field enter 123 as given in FB50.
    Save and post it. Now it should work.
    Regards

  • ICR - Mark Assigned Documents for Payment.

    Hi All,
    I am looking at enhancing the ICR functionality by adding an option of marking assigned documents for payment, and was wondering whether anyone has done something similar. What I would like to do is to let the user have an option (additional button) where the assigned (without differences) documents i.e. reconciled across both partner companies, are marked with a flag that can later be used in the F110 selections. This could be the ZUONR field as an example, and should happen in the leading company documents only. I am aware that there are possibilities to automate correction postings from within FBICR3 but am not sure if this would cater for mass document changes to the underlying data?
    Any advice (.e. is there a standard BADI) will be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Kris

    Hello Kris,
    There is no standard functionality or BADI example implementation.
    Implementing a BADI would make sense if you would want to trigger this manually. Otherwise it would probably be better to run a program to process mass data...
    Best regards,
    Ralph

  • EHSM - Create Vendor - error: 'Could not find a document for the given key'

    Dear all,
    In the Chemical Approval Process I have attached a SDS document to the Approval Request. You can assign a Vendor to the SDS. As there are no (EHSM) Vendors currently available in the system I would like to create a new (EHSM) Vendor by clicking on 'Create Vendor'.
    This will lead me to the following Webdynpro Application: Edit Vendor (EHFND_UI_VENDOR_OVP).
    Only one field is shown in the Webdynpro named: 'Name of the Vendor'. After typing a name e.g. 'test', the following error message appears; 'Could not find a document for the given key'. See also attached document. This issue looks like a missing number range, however I could not find a EHSM number range for Vendors.
    How to solve this issue?
    More information:
    Software Component: SAP EHS Management (EHSM) Support Package: 3
    Process: Chemical Approval
    Webdynpro application: EHFND_UI_VENDOR_OVP
    Thank you.
    Kind regards,
    Roy

    Hi
    babooraj
    This might be a problem with Windows Power Shell.
    The solution is to copy the folder: "PSWorkflow" from "C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\Modules\"
    to "C:\Windows\SysWOW64\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\Modules"
    Than everything works fine.
    Ps.: @Microsoft, please fix this problem in future versions.
    Thomas van Veen

  • Adobe connect could not process this document for viewing

    I am using Connect 9 and trying to add a PDF to a share pod. These PDF's are sized at 11x17 and were converted from dwg  files. They are 2-4 megs in size. When I add them to a share pod I get the following error:
    "adobe connect could not process this document for viewing. Please try uploading the file again."
    Things I have already tried:
    Optimizing the PDF
    Printing the dwg file to a pdf
    Adding the pdf to my content library and then adding it to the share pod
    Reducing the page size
    Adding other PDF's to the meeting or pods work fine including larger sized files. My meeting is in 2 days and I can go with a screen share if I have too, but am working witha coulpe of novice presenters and want to make the process as easy for them as posible.
    Any help is appreciated.
    David

    I am having the exact same issue. It would be nice if there were a link to the remedy on this disucssion thread.
    EDIT: just found this - http://forums.adobe.com/message/5049521#5049521 will give it a try and see what happens.

  • FI invoices not picking up Terms of Payment

    Hi,
    We have FI invoices (Posted through FB60) for freight charges. These invoices hit frieght expense account instead of being posted against a PO.
    The problem is that when these invoices are posted, they are due immediately. We checked the payment terms of vendor and the terms of payment should not make the invoice due for payment immediately, instead due after 30 days.
    Hence, the problem is that the correct terms of payment are not being picked up by that invoice doc type. Can you please suggest a solution, as to what could be wrong or where to look.
    Thank you.

    The thing is that this vendor is not a regular vendor. Its a pay to vendor created without a regular (parent) vendor. Hence, I cannot look this vendor up in the Xk03 tcode. I checked the payment terms in table LFb1. There the payment terms say 30 days due.
    Additionally I checked payment transactions view in XK03 for another vendor and did not find any field named payment terms. Not sure if its even there. Did you mean to check the payment terms in the purchasing view instead?
    We are using Retail system, so maybe its different here. I doubt it, but just a thought.
    So to summarize basically, there is no FI payment terms, we use only regular payment terms from vendor and I checked those in LFB1. They do not say due immediately. Secondly, the vendor is a invoicing party (created without a regular vendor). When invoices post, they hit a freight expense account directly.
    Any advice?

  • F110 - not able to make the payment error - Check amts -ex rate is too high

    Hi Experts,
    While running F110 Iam getting the below error. The proposal runs fine. When I run the payment run the status shows "Payment run has been carried out" but no document has been generated. The log says-
    "Job started
    Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000004845, user ID DWARKID)
    Log for payment run for payment on 16.02.2011, identification I0038
    Check amounts - exchange rate is too high (       10,348.00395-)
    End of log
    Job finished
    Its saying Ex Rate is too high. Could you please let me know how to resolve this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Dwarak

    Hello Vishwa,
    I tried with both the options. Still getting the same error.
    Please let me know what needs to be done.
    Job started
    Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000004848, user ID DWARAKID)
    Log for payment run for payment on 17.02.2011, identification I0038
    Check amounts - exchange rate is too high (       10,348.00395-)
    End of log
    Job finished
    Thanks & Regards,
    Dwarakanath

  • How to create print document for payment to customer through cash journal

    Dear Sirs,
    I have a problem with print document from cash journal. I enter a payment to customer (when I turn the money to customer) and the system makes right posting, but when I try to print this point, system printing document for incom from customer. I'm using business transaction for customer posting in cash journal. I would like to know how I have to manage this posting - payment to customer, or incoming from vendor (returnes advances from emploee)?

    Hi,
    please check whether the two solutions below work:
    1. create a contract with milestone billing plan where there are only down payment billings, so that on the basis of the contract you can generate down payment requests and then relevant down payments, release the contract to a sales order which can then be delivered and billed, manually clear the billing document with the down payments
    2. from FI module, create down payment requests via t-code F-37 directly, and then down payment posting, generate sales order directly, and then deliver and bill, manually clear the billing document with the down payments

  • MIGO it is not picking business area for stock account

    dear all
    here we created business area wise balance sheet and profit and loss account it is picking business area for all GL accounts excluding Stock account , while making goods receipt MIGO it is not picking business area, we assigned business area to plant and division. here is it possible to pick business area at the time of goods receipt. it is capturing  for all MM and SD entries here it is not able to capture for stock account.
    regards
    babu

    i make the fields optional in FSG for stock account and movement type  when i make MIGO when i select entries are automatically generates so it is not possible to capture business area, plese any one give me answer is it possible to capture business are at the time of MIGO
    regards
    babu

  • Excise not picked in SO for new plant

    Hai gurus,
    Excise is not picked up while creating a sale order for a newly created plant. If I use a existing plant , Excise is picked in SO. I have maintained the condition record for the newly created plant also.
    Can U say where I would have gone wrong.
    Points will be rewarded.......
    Regards,
    vimal

    Dear Vimal
    I have already answered this question and your problem is solved.  Can you please close this thread also if so.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Function to retrieve long text in FI document for payment file

    Hi
    Is there a function i could use to retrieve the long text in the invoice document for the payment reference field in the payment file?
    Would appreciate your urgetn advice.
    Thanks.

    Possiblity could be that you have passed the wrong object name id or any parameters.
    See below the similar code.
    If you want to know the correct tdobject and correct tdname combinations go to table STXH and under name give the document number ie 1900000000 ie docno then you will come to know the correct tdname and object and tdid from which you can use the read_text function module
    DATA : tdobject TYPE thead-tdobject,
               tdname   TYPE thead-tdname,
               tdid     TYPE thead-tdid,
               tdspras  TYPE thead-tdspras.
      DATA : lines    TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tline INITIAL SIZE 0,
             wa_lines TYPE tline.
    CONCATENATE bkpf-bukrs bkpf-belnr bkpf-gjahr INTO tdname.
      tdobject = 'BELEG'.
      tdid     = '0005'.
      tdspras  = sy-langu.
      CALL FUNCTION 'READ_TEXT'
        EXPORTING
    *     CLIENT                        = SY-MANDT
          id                            = tdid
          language                      = tdspras
          name                          = tdname
          object                        = tdobject
    *     ARCHIVE_HANDLE                = 0
    *     LOCAL_CAT                     = ' '
    *   IMPORTING
    *     HEADER                        =
        TABLES
          lines                         = lines
        EXCEPTIONS
          id                            = 1
          language                      = 2
          name                          = 3
          not_found                     = 4
          object                        = 5
          reference_check               = 6
          wrong_access_to_archive       = 7
          OTHERS                        = 8.
       IF sy-subrc <> 0.
         MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                 WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
       ELSE.
         READ TABLE lines INTO wa_lines INDEX 1.
         IF sy-subrc = 0.
           write at 51(10) wa_lines-tdline.
         ENDIF.
       ENDIF.
    Regards
    Gopi

  • Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

    Hi All,
    I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
    Actual Issue:
    When creating the sales order manually,
    tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
    When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
    We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
    Can anybody solve this issue!
    What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

    Hi All,
    Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
    Working:
    When creating the sales order manually,
    tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
    Actual Issue:
    When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
    tax value is not picked .
    I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
    I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
    But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
    I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
    What can be the issue over here!
    Can anybody give me solution for the same!
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

  • AAM not picking up Updates for CC (2014)

    I just noticed that my deployments of Adobe CC 2014 are not picking updates form my Internal Adobe Update Server.
    The Update Server seems to be working fine, and i can pull updates from Adobe fine, but the local machines are not getting any updates for CC(2014)
    I just found that if i remove the AdobeUpdateAdminPrefs.dat file from it's location, and launch Photoshop CC(2014) The Updates is able to be selected and shows a few updates for the CC(2014) package.
    If i put the file back, and launch, i get an Updates that is grayed out and finds nothing.
    It worked fine in CS6 and CC.
    Please advise, is there a new AAM I should be using?

    After some testing, i do find that the overrides file is working properly for my base/newly built machines. So, it must be something on a currently deployed machine, so i can fix that.. I guess technically it's working...
    But, i'm noticing that the Internal AAM server it's looking at is not showing all of the updates it should,
    I did see some errors of :
    Downloading http://swupdl.adobe.com/updates/oobe/aam20/mac/PhotoshopCameraRawForElements11-7.1-x64/7.3 .37/7.3.37.xml
    ******** HTTP Error*********
    Failed to open remote file http://swupdl.adobe.com/updates/oobe/aam20/mac/PhotoshopCameraRawForElements11-7.1-x64/7.3 .37/7.3.37.xml
    Downloading update:  AdobeExtensionManagerCS5-5.0/5.0.1
    I usually just do an incremental update (Mac Server running 10.8)
    Do i need to do a Forced Update? or a 1, of re-downloading a fresh copy of everything?
    It's only a couple updates, But one missing, is the latest Photoshop, which i see if i remove the overrides file, but disappears if i use the overrides file.
    Thanks.

  • Not picking the stock for the delivery

    Dear friends,
    Though the stock is available, it is not getting picked for the delivery.
    Can you guide me what are the things I should check to solve the issue.
    With regards,
    Atul

    Hi,
    If the picking tab is grayed use T.Code LT03.( IF ware house management is activated).Here fill the ware house number and plant and mention the delivery note number also. Now use The T.Code TCode VL02N here u can see the system automatically picks the required quantity.
    If the picking tab is not in gray mode mention the storage location and the plant correctly. Even though the system is not picking the quantity check the Picking location determination with rule MALA.and also check any open orders are crated for the particular material .
    regards,
    vas.
    Message was edited by:
            v.s.vas.

Maybe you are looking for