Facebook question about private groups

I am a member of a private Facebook group and while I can see the group's Wall, I cannot find the link to the discussion board.  I have the BB 8900 with data package and have tried both the browser and the Facebook for BB application.  It seems like I get a very condensed version of Facebook on the BB, with limited access.

Hi and welcome to the forums!
Here is the link to the Facebook support page. Facebook support page
It contains the user guides and trouble shooting tips as well as a complete list of support articles.
Look over the information and see if you can pick out what you are seeing wrong with the app.
Post back and we can work on fixing the issues.
Thanks,
Bifocals
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Install BlackBerry Protect it's a free application designed to help find your lost BlackBerry smartphone, and keep the information on it secure.

Similar Messages

  • Question about Everyone Group in SharePoint 2013

    Hi,
    I have couple of question about EVERYONE group below,
             - As per the best practice which Group we should use instead of EVERYONE group in Sharepoint ?
             - What is the difference between Everyone and All Authenticated Users Group
    We have added Everyone Group in different sites, now the question is if we hide this group showing up in sharepoint people picker, is there any impact interms of current site?
             - Is there any way we can hide Everyone group showing up in the people picker only for the site / Site Collection level.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    srabon

    There is no functional difference between the Everyone group and All Authenticated Users (after Active Directory has been upgraded to Server 2003 native schema).
    I'm not aware of any function to hide the group from the People Picker.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Question about split group by in IQ16 SP08.

    Dear all,
    I have a customer who encountered performance of "union all view".
    As per our analysis, IQ optimizer does't split the Group By.
    [Query]
    select "EDPS_CSN","count"()
      from "adwown"."vw_adw_dpy111n_01"
      group by "edps_csn"
    As far as I know, There are some restrictions on the situations and queries that benefit from the split GROUP BY.
    But this view meets all restrictions.
    Please refer to the below URL.
    [Impact on query performance of GROUP BY over a UNION ALL]
    - http://infocenter.sybase.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.sybase.infocenter.dc00169.1520/html/iqperf/iqperf35.htm
      So I would like to know the following questions.
      1) How to enforce the split the group by.
      2) Any changes about split group by in IQ16 SP08?
      I failed to attach the query pland becuase it's extension is html.
      Any comments or advice will be greatly apprecaited.
      ** Base Table Rows
        1) ADWOWN.TB_ADW_DPY119N : 23,259
        2) ADWOWN.TB_ADW_DPY111N : 398,017,348
        3) ADWOWN.TB_ADW_DPY117N : 16,160,487
    Thanks
    Gi-Sung Jang

    The big issue is that the GROUP BY is on the view, not on the base tables.  At the time of optimization, we don't know always know the data distribution of the GROUP BY key.  At least we don't know whether or not each table in the UNION ALL has overlapping data for that column.  Consequently, you have to retrieve all data first, sort/order it, then run the group by.
    There are caveats to this, as your link provides.  But what is missing from your post is the logic of the view.  Can you provide that?
    Mark

  • A question about cache group error in TimesTen 7.0.5

    hello, chris:
    we got some errors about cache group :
    2008-09-21 08:56:15.99 Err : ORA: 229574: ora-229574-3085-ogTblGC00405: Failed calling OCI function: OCIStmtFetch()
    2008-09-21 08:56:15.99 Err : ORA: 229574: ora-229574-3085-raUtils00373: Oracle native error code = 1405, msg = ORA-01405: fetched column value is NULL
    2008-09-21 08:56:28.16 Err : ORA: 229576: ora-229576-2057-raStuff09837: Unexpected row count. Expecting 1. Got 0.
    and the exact scene is: our oracle server was restart for some reason, but we didnot restart the cache group agent. then iit start appear those errors informations.
    we want to know, if the oracle server restart, whether we need to restart cache agent?? thank you..

    Yes, the tracking table will track all changes to the associated base table. Only changes that meet the cache group WHERE clause predicate will be refreshed to TimesTen.
    The tracking table is managed automatically by the cache agent. As long as the cache agent is running and AUTOREFRESH is occurring the table will be space managed and old data will be purged.
    It is okay if very occasionally an AUTOREFRESH is unable to complete within its defined interval but if this happens with any regularity then this is a problem since this situation is unsustainable. To remedy this you need to try one or more of:
    1. Tune execution of AUTOREFRESH queries in Oracle. This may mean adding additional indexes to some of the cached Oracle tables. There is an article on this in MetaLink (doc note 473493.1).
    2. Increase the AUTOREFRESH interval so that a refresh can always complete within the defined interval.
    In any event it is important that you have enough space to cope with the 'steady state' size of the tracking table. If the cache agent will not be running for any significant length of time you need to manually cleanup the tracking table. In TimesTen 11g a script to do this is provided but it is not officially supported in TimesTen 7.0.
    If the rate of updates on the base table is such that you cannot arrive at a sustainable situation by tuning etc. then you will need to consider more radical options such as breaking the table into multiple separate tables :-(
    Chris

  • Two questions about Logon Group

    About logon group, it describes as below in the help.sap.com.
    1. Each SAP application has different resource requirements. Certain applications may therefore require more servers and logon groups. For example, you should assign separate servers for the application component PP.
    Q1: How a certain application use more than one servers via logon group, and how it use sap memory which resides in different servers?
    2. If it is not practical for you to assign separate servers to integrated applications, such as the application components SD-MM and FI-CO, you should assign common logon groups to these applications.
    Q2: I don't understand this sentence exactly.
    Thanks so much.
    James

    Not sure if I exactly understood what your problem is, but let me give it a try:
    A1: One logon group may have several servers attached to it. If users user1, user2, user3, ... are going to connect to the logon group, they will be sent to different servers. None of those users will be able to use memory from more than one server. But, let's say user1 and user2 will use resources from server1, whereas user3 will use resources from server2. The goal is that all servers will have the same (or similar) load, just by distributing users.
    A2: If it is not possible to have four logon groups for the four applications SD, MM, FI, CO, but you still want different logon groups, then, at least, you should create two logon groups, one for SD and MM, the other one for FI and CO. That's because resource requirements are similar for SD and MM, and for FI and CO.
    hope this helps

  • Question about SNMPv3 group/user configuration

    I'm trying to do configure SNMPv3 on a 2811 router for the following:
    - group ADMIN should allow user access from 10.10.1.0/24
    - user IT is on group ADMIN, using MD5 authentication
    Is the following the right configuration? should I configure engine-ID? should I put "access 1" to the "snmp-server user" command?
    snmp-server group ADMIN v3 priv read READMIBS write WRITEMIBS access 1
    snmp-server user IT ADMIN v3 auth md5 password
    access-list 1 permit 10.10.1.0 0.0.0.255

    Now I did pull off a way to hide groups based on the step contextuly without different profilesWould you mind sharing this with the community? It might be helpful for the others, and it could also help to move your question forward.
    I am trying to imagine:
    - one place where you can add idocScript to rules&profiles is Rules Activation Condition. Was this you way?
    - if so, you could have several rules, under a single profile (my previous answer was a bit imprecise in that respect), and within the activation condition you can specify when you want the rule to apply, and in the rule itself you can then specify what fields, and whether a field should be editable or read-only, etc. Note that you can have multiple rules defining usage of the same metadata field - it is more transparent if activation conditions are mutually excluding
    I'm still struggling with your pressure on showing/hiding groups. Could you describe it on a real-life example? Also, could you describe what is your way to display metadata within a workflow process?
    My real example is as follows:
    - an invoice document is scanned by a receptionist. It could be an A/P invoice for paying raw material, or office supplies (I think they had three major categories). Depending on that, the receptionist sends it to the appropriate department (by filling an option-list metadata)
    - the head of department either accepts it, or sends it to the correct department. By accepting, he or she also fills in the responsible clerk to process the invoice (also an option-list)
    - the clerk is no longer allowed to modify Dept and RespPerson metadata, but fills in other metadata like Supplier, Invoice Amount, etc. - those fields are not visible to previous reviewers at all
    - etc.

  • Question about private browsing andcookies in rel 3.6.6

    I have been using Auto Private Browsing mode for the last 6 months and never had any problems before with accessing my banks online service. That is until I updated to Firefox 3.6.6.
    Before this problem started, when I went to my Banks website and entered my Username i was sent to another URL and asked to verify an Image so I could enter my password.
    Since updating to 3.6.6 every time I go to my banks website I am prompted to answer a security question and also asked if i want to save the info from this PC( so i don't have to answer a security question every time.)
    I would really like to stay with Private Browsing all of the time.
    I have tried entering ALL the websites that my bank uses in the Tools -> Options Privacy Tab -> Exceptions Tab to ALLOW from these websites. What appears to be happening now is that they are always deleted when I end a Firefox session. But allowed to be added when I start a FF session and go to my banks website(s).
    I would have assumed that if I was going to allow these Exception website to write cookies that they would not be deleted when I exited Firefox. I guess that's a wrong assumption, hey?
    How can I resolve this problem?

    Your Goal: Persist data from websites on your computer (your bank's offer to save information for your PC).
    Private Browsing's goal: Prevent any persistence of information from websites, including that you've been to them at all.
    If a website was able to have Firefox store cookies from a site in private browsing mode, that would appear after restarting Firefox or exiting Private Browsing, the feature would be completely worthless.
    Don't use [[Private Browsing]] if you want Firefox to save information (such as cookies, including the login token from your security question).
    A reason I could think why this would stop working is you originally authorized a computer (browser, really) outside of Private Browsing and then this authorization expired.

  • Question about private web browsing and Spotlight

    I was browsing personal webpages on a work computer using Safari's 'Private Web Browsing', but although Safari doesn't remember the pages, Spotlight does which is a little concerning!
    I have excluded webpages from Spotlight searches but that doesn't mean the pages have gone. I have tried clearing my history in Safari and Resetting it, to no avail. Can someone tell me how to delete the webpages from Spotlight?
    Thanks and regards

    Hi Rapidness,
    I checked on my computer and do not have this issue. And I have no website located somewhere on my machine, after cleaning / or resetting the browser.
    In the "Safari" - Menu > below the "Private Surfing" > is "Safari Reset"
    Maybe you should try this...
    You can also use "Onyx" to reset the browser. See the link below:
    http://www.titanium.free.fr/pgs2/english/download.html

  • Simple Question About Using "Group by" Inside the Oracle XE Query Builder

    Hi,
    I am a new user of Oracle 10g XE and I have built and populated some tables. I am trying to create a view (make a query) via using the Query Builder. I have chosen two attributes, say course_section_ID and trainer_ID in the same table. I choose the "COUNT" function for course_section_no and I check the box for "Group By" with trainer_ID. (I would like to count the number course sections each trainer is teaching). Then I "run" the query and the same error message appears:
    fail to parse SQL query:
    ORA-00904: "COURSE_SECTION"."TRAINER_ID": invalid identifier
    Both attribute names should be valid (as shown above).
    If I only choose course_section_ID and do a COUNT on it, it gives the same error message on course_section_no.
    I did try to do the same thing with the demo HR database. There were no problems with counting a field nor with grouping on a field with HR.
    PLEASE HELP!
    Thanks.

    I have got it. When all the attribute names are in the uppercase, then I can do aggregate functions and "group by" with the GUI.

  • Question about Function group

    Hi All,
    I have to transport a function module from development to next environment. The function group has around 9 function modules among them i have edited one and assigned to a transport request. Do I have to include function group also in the transport along with the function module? pls suggest, in which scenarios we have to transport function group along with function module?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Suresh,
    You dont need to transport the Function Group. You would transport it only if the FG is not available in another system or if there is any change in the main program of the FG.
    If you create a New Function Module and attach the FM to this FG, then an include gets automatically added to the main program. In this scenario you may need to transport all.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ram.

  • [Solved] Questions about /etc/group and /etc/gshadow

    This morning, package filesystem was upgraded to 2015.02-1 and pacnew files were created for /etc/group and /etc/gshadow. I ran diff against my current files, and the differences seem very minor, to me. I need some guidance to understand whether I should implement the pacnew changes.
    The only significant difference I see in the group file is that in my original version, my username is added to the wheel group. This seems correct, to me.
    For gshadow, there is the same difference for wheel. However, there are several entries where my original entry contains an exclamation point, but the new version does not. For example:
    < proc:!::
    > proc:::
    If I run man /etc/gshadow, it does not give me what I understand as a man page, and gives me what appears to be a listing of the stuff in my /etc/gshadow file, instead. Which does not help me.
    So, like I say, I need some guidance on dealing with these pacnew files.
    Tim
    PS - I now see that "man gshadow" gives me an actual man page. Sorry. I am currently studying it.
    Last edited by ratcheer (2015-02-24 21:37:52)

    After the update to filesystem 2015.02-1 some voices in /etc/gshadow were changed (in the pacnew file) from
    systemd-journal-gateway:!::
    systemd-timesync:!::
    systemd-network:!::
    systemd-bus-proxy:!::
    systemd-resolve:!::
    to
    systemd-journal-gateway:::
    systemd-timesync:::
    systemd-network:::
    systemd-bus-proxy:::
    systemd-resolve:::
    What's the change? Before they had a locked password (the ! sign) and now they haven't?

  • Qustions about Package "Groups"

    Hello,
    I have some general questions about package "groups" in Pacman. Mainly, I'm curious about who is responsible for deciding when a group will be made and what packages will be included. For example, I type in "pacman -S gnome" and get this:
    gnome package not found, searching for group...
    :: group gnome (including ignored packages):
    epiphany gnome-applets gnome-backgrounds gnome-control-center
    gnome-desktop gnome-icon-theme gnome-media gnome-mime-data gnome-mount
    gnome-panel gnome-screensaver gnome-session gnome-settings-daemon
    gnome-themes gnome2-user-docs libgail-gnome metacity nautilus
    notification-daemon yelp
    :: Install whole content? [Y/n]
    Who decides what all those packages will be? Is there a place where users can provide input about what should be included? I realize a big part of package groups by be simply ease of dependecy managent, but it seems it would be a useful tool for users to get a system up and running quickly. For example, there are several basic things that one would need to get a usable "desktop" up and running (not counting the WM or DM). For example, xorg, alsa, etc.
    I understand that Arch is all about simplicity and building a system from the ground up, which I totally love, but many of us are still going to have the same core goals in mind when setting up a "desktop" system.  We're all going to need xorg, want sound, desire pretty fonts, and have some common useful apps. So, for anyone that falls into that category, a package group called something like "arch-desktop" could include some of these core components. We could even eventually have additional groups tailored towards specific DMs like "arch-desktop-xfce" or "arch-desktop-gnome".
    Now, I realize I've totally spun this specifically for this propsed "arch-desktop" group but I guess my main point was to find out where one could provide official input for such things.
    Thanks!
    Swill

    Mr. Swillis wrote:It seems to me like something that could make things "quicker" for an advanced user to get setup (less stuff to remember) and perhaps "easier" for teaching new Arch users.
    Since pacman will resolve all dependencies, all you need is to do a
    # pacman -Syu
    # pacman -S gnome
    after a core-install. Everything else you would need, could be clutter to someone else. I don't believe there is something as a 'sane default of packages'. Maybe if you're a fan of a particular windowmanager, then you might be interested in what the majority uses for a panel, a taskbar, a background-image-viewer, but also then there are so many choices and personal preferences that everyone could make his or her own group of packages.
    my 0.02€

  • Questions about Mapping GL Accounts to Group Accounts

    Hi,
    I have some questions about mapping gl accounts to group accounts while configuring OBIEE APPS 7.9.6.3 with EBS R12 as a source:
    FIRST QUESTION.-
    For file file_group_acct_codes_ora.csv, I have the following accounts from my customer:
    101101 - Caja Administrativa
    101102 - Fondo Revolvente
    101103 - Caja de Cambios
    101104 - Efectivo en cajero
    This group of accounts is named CASH, now my customer said that this group begins in 101101 and ends in 101199 but in this moment only have this 4 accounts in GL, the rest of the accounts, I mean 101105-101199 are not used right now, they are gonna used in the future.
    So, my question is, in file_group_acct_codes_ora.csv how I need to put this group:
    In this way:
    CHART OF ACCOUNTS ID,FROM ACCT,TO ACCT,GROUP_ACCT_NUM
    50308,101101,101104,CASH
    Or in this way:
    CHART OF ACCOUNTS ID,FROM ACCT,TO ACCT,GROUP_ACCT_NUM
    50308,101101,101199,CASH
    I mean, is there any problem if I use the second way, or is necessary to do it in the first way, and why?
    SECOND QUESTION.-
    For file file_group_acct_names.csv, when I update with a new group of accounts, is there any rule or size boundary for GROUP_ACCOUNT_NAME?
    THIRD QUESTION.-
    For file_group_acct_names.csv, what is the value in column LANGUAGE? I mean, is EBS language?, DB language?, server language?
    I hope that someone can help me, because I need to clarify this and don't do the first full load and this load ends with error because of this.
    Regards,
    Arnulfo

    I'll take some broad swipes at this and let the smarter people come fill in the details.
    We have a true 1:1 setup in our office and have moved to PHDs as a means of protecting against downtime. The thinking is that we will have a spare machine lying around with our base installation ready to go. If a user's machine fails we'll replace it with the spare machine, let it sync the user directory from the server, and we're back in business. It's no substitute for a real backup system, but it potentially avoids having to run a restore from your backups. It also reduces network traffic compared to plain networked homes, and still lets your users work if the server goes down, but provides the benefits of centralized management. John DeTroye wrote a nice article about this.
    If you've already got data on your "client" Mac you will need to move it onto the server. PHDs will download data from the server to the client on the first sync, but will not upload a complete home directory from the client to an empty directory on the server. You'll find some posts in this forum discussing how people have gone about migrating data prior to that first sync.
    WGM allows you to establish exclusions for stuff you don't want to sync.
    One thing to watch out for in the scenario you describe is the so-called "rabbit effect." Assume Bob uses Mac1 as his primary machine. If one day he logs into Mac2 his home directory will be downloaded to Mac2. Once he returns to Mac1 he'll still be cluttering up Mac2 with his data. If he logs into Mac3 the next day and Tom and Sue are also periodically logging into different machines, you can see how you'll end up with a mess pretty quickly.
    Hope this helps.

  • Private groups on Facebook App

    How can I see my private groups using my Blackberry App?  I have no problem with this from my wife's Iphone, but can't find them on my BB.

    use your browser and go to https://m.facebook/com/ .
    The search box on top-right of this page is your true friend, and the public Knowledge Base too:

  • Re: Questions about Plan structure

    Reply-To: "Duncan Kinnear" <[email protected]>
    Q. if you have an Employee class with related EmployeeSubordinate and
    EmployeeSalaryHistory classes, should these all be in the same plan?
    A It is better to have them in the same plan.It depends on the design
    you have
    Q Why should the Managers be separated from their business classes?
    A Managers are usually service objects which might require different
    resources.
    These managers when deployed might be required by several other
    applications.
    Seperating them as a different plan will help in just using one
    installed partition to be
    Used by different applications (refer about Reference Partition)
    Q If you have the Database managers separate, what scope does each DB
    manager cover?
    A It is better to have the DB managers in user scope.
    It depends on the numbers of users, u have for the system.
    Since u are talking about 100 tables. It's a huge system.
    It also depends on the user licenses u have for the backend.
    Take care that u use proper load balancing of DB Managers for the
    system.
    Krishna CVSR
    GoldStone Softech Inc
    >
    Hi there,
    We are in the middle of designing the structure of a new system.
    I have read/heard that it is best to break down the plans into the
    following categories:
    Business Classes
    Managers/Services
    Clients
    I have a few questions about this structure:
    Should related business classes be grouped together in Plans? E.g. if
    you have an Employee class with related EmployeeSubordinate and
    EmployeeSalaryHistory classes, should these all be in the same plan?
    Why should the Managers be separated from their business classes?
    E.g. if there is an EmployeeMgr service which deals with anything to do
    with the Employee business class, why separate them in different
    plans? If you need the manager to access the class, you will always
    need both.
    Some of the Forte documentation talks about "Policy" managers and
    "Database" managers. How do the functions of these managers differ
    for a simple CRUD (Create Read Update Delete) class?
    If you have the Database managers separate, what scope does each
    DB manager cover? I.e. do you have one for the entire database (over
    100 tables in our case), or do you break it down by sub-system?
    Thanks in advance for any answers.
    Cheers,
    Duncan Kinnear,
    McCarthy and Associates, Email: [email protected]
    PO Box 764, McLean Towers, Phone: +64 6 834 3360
    Shakespeare Road, Napier, New Zealand. Fax: +64 6 834 3369
    Providing Integrated Software to the Meat Processing Industry for over 10 years
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Reply-To: "Duncan Kinnear" <[email protected]>
    Q. if you have an Employee class with related EmployeeSubordinate and
    EmployeeSalaryHistory classes, should these all be in the same plan?
    A It is better to have them in the same plan.It depends on the design
    you have
    Q Why should the Managers be separated from their business classes?
    A Managers are usually service objects which might require different
    resources.
    These managers when deployed might be required by several other
    applications.
    Seperating them as a different plan will help in just using one
    installed partition to be
    Used by different applications (refer about Reference Partition)
    Q If you have the Database managers separate, what scope does each DB
    manager cover?
    A It is better to have the DB managers in user scope.
    It depends on the numbers of users, u have for the system.
    Since u are talking about 100 tables. It's a huge system.
    It also depends on the user licenses u have for the backend.
    Take care that u use proper load balancing of DB Managers for the
    system.
    Krishna CVSR
    GoldStone Softech Inc
    >
    Hi there,
    We are in the middle of designing the structure of a new system.
    I have read/heard that it is best to break down the plans into the
    following categories:
    Business Classes
    Managers/Services
    Clients
    I have a few questions about this structure:
    Should related business classes be grouped together in Plans? E.g. if
    you have an Employee class with related EmployeeSubordinate and
    EmployeeSalaryHistory classes, should these all be in the same plan?
    Why should the Managers be separated from their business classes?
    E.g. if there is an EmployeeMgr service which deals with anything to do
    with the Employee business class, why separate them in different
    plans? If you need the manager to access the class, you will always
    need both.
    Some of the Forte documentation talks about "Policy" managers and
    "Database" managers. How do the functions of these managers differ
    for a simple CRUD (Create Read Update Delete) class?
    If you have the Database managers separate, what scope does each
    DB manager cover? I.e. do you have one for the entire database (over
    100 tables in our case), or do you break it down by sub-system?
    Thanks in advance for any answers.
    Cheers,
    Duncan Kinnear,
    McCarthy and Associates, Email: [email protected]
    PO Box 764, McLean Towers, Phone: +64 6 834 3360
    Shakespeare Road, Napier, New Zealand. Fax: +64 6 834 3369
    Providing Integrated Software to the Meat Processing Industry for over 10 years
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Maybe you are looking for