Feature-based Licensing and Timer-based Licensing

Can we combine both licencing, which I would need to market my application for users from different countries interested in testing for a certain time their specific language application of interest featured in the application?

Currently you wouldn't be able to set up variable pricing for the application based on the features that user decides to choose.  However, this is on the roadmap of features that we want to offer in the future.

Similar Messages

  • Difference between Forecast Based Planning and Time-Phased Planning

    Difference between Forecast Based Planning and Time-Phased Planning and  Time-phased w.auto.reord.point

    Hi,
    go through this links
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/fr/7d/c27143454011d182b40000e829fbfe/content.htm
    http://it.toolbox.com/wiki/index.php/Time-Phased_Planning
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/fd/45bc639d6411d189b60000e829fbbd/content.htm
    Regards,
    Sreehari

  • Reconciliation of  costing based COPA and account based COPA

    hi experts,
                 I want reconciliation statement of A/c based copa and costing based copa through SAP. we have not configured any account based copa reports. now we are manually doing the reconciliation. Please tell me the configuration.
    Thanks & regards
    jay

    HI
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting
    Regards,
    Vijayanand Sankaran

  • Differences between Costing based COPA and Account based COPA

    Hi,
    I wanted to know the main differences between Costing based COPA and Account based COPA?
    For which scenarios account based COPA used and for which scenarios costing based copa used.
    please guide me
    sateesh

    HI
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting
    Regards,
    Vijayanand Sankaran

  • There are two CDC methods - Source based CDC and Target based CDC which one

    There are two CDC methods - Source based CDC and Target based CDC, which one is better performancewise. in data services.
    If there is any document available which compares both and provides any info on performance etc, will be helpful.
    thank you for the helpful info.

    LIke Suneer mentioned CDC is for better performance.
    Following link would be helpful.
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BOBJ/Extractors-Source-Based+CDC
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BOBJ/Extractors-Target-Based+CDC
    Thanks,
    Arun

  • Can we frame a VO which is a combination of EO based VO and SQL based VO?

    Is it possible to create a VO which is a combination of EO based VO and SQL based VO? Is the resultant VO capable of inserting data in the database?

    Fortunately, this is such a common use case that it's documented how to do this:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26098_01/web.1112/e16182/bcquerying.htm#CEGEGHFB
    and
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26098_01/web.1112/e16182/bcquerying.htm#CHDHBDDE
    are the two sections you need to read.
    You don't need a "combination" VO, and in both cases, the base EO of the VO is updatable/insertable
    Note: This is why the best course is to state your use case (problem) - not failed or attempted solutions - when posting questions on OTN.

  • Differance between the Cost based costing and Account based costing

    Hi,
    What is the Differance between the Cost Based Costing and Account Based Costing ?

    You can check sap note 69384
    COSTING-BASED PROFITABILITY ACCOUNT-BASED PROFITABILITY
    ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
    OBJECTIVE
    o profitability and sales accounting
    o evaluation of market segments (for example,
    customers, product groups, sales areas) and corporate
    units (for example, division, sales organization) with
    regard to their profit or contribution margins
    o calculation of profits procedures
    - cost-of-sales accounting
    - interim and reconciled sales report
    - periodic and transaction-based allocation
    - Profitability Analysis on the basis of full and
    direct costs
    o posted and costing-based values o account-based values
    o can be reconciled with FI for o always reconciled with
    account groups (revenues, sales FI on account level
    deductions, costs of goods
    Note 69384 - Information: Account-based Profitability Analysis
    manufactured, and so on)
    DATA STRUCTURES
    o definition of operating concerns o definition of operating
    with fixed characteristics and concerns with fixed and useruser-
    defined characteristics defined characteristics
    and value fields
    o cumulative storage by posting o cumulative storage by
    periods and weeks posting periods
    o storage in operating concern o controlling area currency,
    currency (as of Release 4.0 also company code currency
    optional in company code currency and transaction currency
    if req.)
    o user-definable summarization levels
    FUNCTIONS
    o transfer of profit relevant o transfer of profit-relevant
    business transactions from SD, FI activities from SD, FI, CO, MM
    CO, MM (revenues, sales deductions (revenues, sales deductions and
    and costs organized by value fields) costs organized by accounts)
    o Derivation of characteristics from master
    data or using derivation rules
    o Realignments also for data that is already
    posted
    o Valuation
    (Costs of goods manufactured, imputed
    costs and sales deductions)
    o sales and profit planning o profit planning
    - flexible layout - flexible layout
    - periodic distribution - periodic distribution
    - valuation, revaluation - forecast procedure
    - forecast procedure - top-down distribution
    - top-down distribution - simulation
    - simulation
    o profit analysis by means of 'interactive drill-down
    reporting'
    - Report Painter
    - object list/ranking lists, database schema
    - drill-down
    - key figure systems
    - flexible hierarchies
    - navigation between reports
    - exception reporting
    - ABC analyses
    - Exporting (Excel, Winword, Mail)

  • TDMS copy based on Company Code and time based reduction.

    I'm struggling to understand the process of this scenario.
    I created a new client in the target system (using local client copy with SAP_UCSV).
    I configured a time based and company code based reduction.
    After the TDMS copy is complete, I check the target system and still find plenty of data that isn't related to the company codes I selected. It appears that it still copies part of the excluded data. For example: I can still find work orders and sales orders for company codes that I specifically didn't select for the copy process.
    Any idea why this is? It appears that the copy doesn't bring across ALL of the excluded data. Just some.
    I double checked and triple checked my TDMS selection for company code based reduction and I can't find any error in there.
    To be more specific: I selected company code A01 A02 A03 and left B01 B02 B03 out. After the copy there are still orders visible in the target system with company code B01 B02 B03.
    This is after I created an empty target client first so it's not copying into an already existing client.
    Thanks for any guidance guys.

    Hm, not sure what's going on. There is no clear link between those existing orders and the company codes I initially selected. Then again it only seems to have a "high level" record of the data. As soon as one starts to drill down, the data is missing as expected. Same goes for other areas as well.
    Looks like we can live with that for now so I won't lose any sleep over it anymore.

  • Asr1000 and time-based acl

    Hi
    We use 7206 as a PPPoE BRAS. All user sessions are rate limited using MQC on virtual-access interfaces.
    Rate changes dependng of the time of day. It's imlemented using time-based acl. Now we want to migrate to asr1000,
    but that router doesn't support time-based acl according to Cisco FN.
    Question is how to change user traffic rates on asr1000 on time of day basis?

    radius attribute nas-port-type through rate-limit (firewall)
    http://conft.com/en/US/docs/ios/security/command/reference/sec_r1.html#wp1062750

  • Both Cash based Accounting and Accrual based Accounting for Capital Exp

    I have a requirement to generate both Cash based and Accrual based accounting for Capital Expenditure transactions. I am thinking of using Secondary Ledger for Cash Based accounting. I have never used secondary ledger or customization in SLA.
    Can someone please let me know the steps to do this, or if this solution is going to work?
    Regards
    Sam

    Hi Dewi
    You will get message (warning):
    Message no. KE107
    Diagnosis
    Operating concern XXXX is set up for both forms of Profitability Analysis (costing-based and account-based).
    You have set an active indicator for only one form. Note that no data will be transferred to the form of Profitability Analysis that you did not activate. If this form is activated at a later point, the data posted up to that point will be missing.
    You can change active flag (customizing request) any time.
    Dejan

  • Cubes - COPA Based Model and Account Based Model.

    please search the forums before posting - the COPA models is well documented in help.sap.com and also in the forums
    Hi All,
    Can some one tell me the difference in Cubes based on COPA Based Model and Cubes on Account Based Model?
    thanks
    Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Jan 28, 2009 8:11 PM

    please search the forums before posting - the COPA models is well documented in help.sap.com and also in the forums
    Hi All,
    Can some one tell me the difference in Cubes based on COPA Based Model and Cubes on Account Based Model?
    thanks
    Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Jan 28, 2009 8:11 PM

  • Timeline slider and time based FOI's

    Hi,
    We are currently working on an IBU demo which needs to spatial Mashup. The Mashup consists of 3 geometry themes defined from 3 tables. There is a requirement now to plot/ show the markers as per a timeline or selected calendar duration. E.g. all the data for April week 1, all the data for April week 2 etc. once the week is selected on the html page.
    Has anyone worked on a map with time dimensions ? We did look at the Google timelines widget but it seemed to be a little complicated and unfortunately our schedules do not allow for much r&d.
    An already available example would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Radhika

    Use predefined themes with parameters. See the templated theme examples in the tutorial. i.e. examples number 10 and 28.

  • Subsequent debit - different behaviour for PO based IR and GR based IR

    Hy Guys,
    i am facing currently a problem with my understanding of system behaviour for GR Based Invoice Verification in combination with Subsequent Debit Postings...
    Example 1 - System Behaviour in case of PO based Invoice Verification:
    PO with 3000 PC Material XYZ / Price 10 EUR
    Goods Receipt for all 3000 Pieces
    Goods Issue for 2000 Pieces
    Situation is now:
    Valuated Material XYZ with Stock Quantity 1000 PC / MAP 10 / Stock Value  = 10.000 EUR
    Subsequent Debit Posting for 300 EUR / 3000 PC
    Result is that Stock Account is debited with 100 EUR / Price Difference with 200 EUR
    New Situation is:
    Valuated Material XYZ with Stock Quantity 1000 PC / MAP 10,1 / Stock Value  = 10.100 EUR
    This makes sense to me!!!
    Example 2 - System Behaviour in case of GR based Invoice Verification:
    PO with 3000 PC Material XYZ / Price 10 EUR
    Seperate Goods Receipt for 1000 PC - three times
    Goods Issue for 2000 Pieces
    Situation is now:
    Valuated Material XYZ with Stock Quantity 1000 PC / MAP 10 / Stock Value  = 10.000 EUR
    Subsequent Debit Posting for 300 EUR / 3000 PC
    Result is that Stock Account is debited with 300 EUR  (But there are only 1000 PC currently on stock!!!!! -  System thinks there are 3000 on stock....)
    New Situation is:
    Valuated Material XYZ with Stock Quantity 1000 PC / MAP 10,3 / Stock Value  = 10.300 EUR
    In that case i think system behaviour is wrong, because MAP increased to much.
    Any comments? Is this customizable?
    Thanks!
    BR;
    Gregor

    Hi Gregor,
    Wellcome to SCN. Please, see SAP Note 308008 - FAQ: Posting logic: GR/IR clearing account, and related notes.
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Can you enable both Windows Based Authentication and Forms Based Authenication for the same web application?

    Hello Community
        In WS2012 and SharePoint 2013 Server is it possible when creating a
    web application to enable both Windows Based Authentication/Negotiate
    (Kerberos) and enable Forms Based Authentication or does the web application
    use either one or the other?
        Thank you
        Shabeaut 

    Yes , you can use dual authentication on same web application. You can use same web application , at OOB login page you will have option to use windows or form login.
    Or you can extend your web application to a new web app and configure extended web application to use Form Based Authentication(Note extended web application will also show same content database , so the content will same only url will be different)
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/ptsblog/archive/2013/09/20/configuring-sharepoint-2013-forms-based-authentication-with-sqlmembershipprovider.aspx
    http://gj80blogtech.blogspot.in/2013/11/forms-based-authentication-fba-in.html
    Thanks
    Ganesh Jat [My Blog |
    LinkedIn | Twitter ]
    Please click 'Mark As Answer' if a post solves your problem or 'Vote As Helpful' if it was useful.

  • Gettin SAP license and total numer license for my Addon

    Hi,
    i need from my addon to read:
    1. license sap number
    2. total license number for my addon
    I see these information in the license administration form in B1 client.
    First is in the 'Allocation' tab, License field.
    Second ins in the 'Components' tab 'total number' field selecting my addon from 'license components' grid.
    How do i get them ?
    thank you
    Paolo

    Hi Edward,
    I already checked SAP Business One License API, but it was a little unclear to me.
    I found this blog post:
    SAP Business One License API
    It's almost 3 years old, is still valid? Is there something newer?
    Talks about 'COM License Bridge'.
    Where do i have to install it? On develompment machine or on SAP B1 server? I guess B1 server.
    Furthermore, in the post i read 'It's important to Note that it will only work on the system where the License Service is running'
    Is this still true?
    I need to access licence information from the client when the addon starts, not from the server.
    Is there any other solution?
    Thank you
    Paolo

Maybe you are looking for