FF713 - Taxcode not assigned to the TAXINN

Hi all,
I am getting the above error, i have done following settings
Created tax code in FTXP for IN
assigned N0 (taxcode) to company code
assined tax code as zero value
i have assigned TAXINN to country IN
can u help me with this problem.
regards,
suresh s

create condition records for the tax code N0..
FV11...
enter any conditions type(JMOP).. and maintain zero value for the taxcode N0

Similar Messages

SAP MII 14.0 SP5 Patch 11 - Error has occurred while processing data stream Dynamic Query role is not assigned to the Data Server

Hello All,
We are using a two tier architecture.
Our Corp server calls the refinery server.
Our CORP MII server uses user id abc_user to connect to the refinery data server.
The user id abc_user has the SAP_xMII_Dynamic_Query role.
The data server also has the checkbox for allow dynamic query enabled.
But we are still getting the following error
Error has occurred while processing data stream
Dynamic Query role is not assigned to the Data Server; Use query template
Once we add the SAP_xMII_Dynamic_Query role to the data server everything works fine. Is this feature by design ?
Thanks,
Kiran

Thanks Anushree !!
I thought that just adding the role to the user and enabling the dynamic query checkbox on the data server should work.
But we even needed to add the role to the data server.
Thanks,
Kiran

SAP System is not assigned to the leading

Hi,
I am trying to configure JOB DOCUMENTATION in "Solution Manager / JSM", under tab "SYSTEMS" when assigning "Logical Components" on the bottom of this screen there is a table "Systems", when in this part trying to ativate "Monitoring" getting following error:
1. System is not assigned to the leading
Can someone pl. help to understand how to assign a system as "Leading:
2. Under tab "Contact Person" I am not able to assign "email, and Telephone**" fields under "communication" are gray, and cannot be modify.
Please help
sahmad

Hi
have you properly configured smsy and maintain the PRD etc roles in it ......pls chk this tutor
http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001911452008E.sim
Pls check this notes and links
Note 1054005 - FAQ: Job Scheduling Management with SAP Solution Manager
Note 1117355 - Job Scheduling Management: Work Center
Note 1111310 - Job Scheduling Management: Extended Configuration
Links:-
   Scheduling
   /people/martin.lauer/blog/2008/01/03/job-scheduling-management-with-sap-solution-manager
Usage Tutorials (http://service.sap.com/rkt-solman)
Job Import
                    http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001975402008E/index.htm
Job Request
                    http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001975952008E/index.htm
Job Documentation
                    http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700000332842009E/index.htm
Job Documentation Templates
                    http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001911082008E.sim
Job Scheduling
                    http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001911452008E.sim
Job Monitoring
                    http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001976052008E/index.htm
Work Center
                    http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001975932008E/index.htm
                    http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001911442008E.sim
Hope it helps
regards
Prakhar

Cause is mentioned as : "The cause for this error is due to person name is not assigned to the FND_USER."

Cause is mentioned as : "The cause for this error is due to person name is not assigned to the FND_USER."
Do we need to attach the person name of employee whose reverse Global deployment we are doing or the person name of the person who is doing this transaction.
Thanks & Regards,
Kirti Mohan Sharma

You just need to attach the person to the FND User. System Administrator responsibility - Security - User screen.
After you have linked the person, you can check the table
Select * from FND_USER
Where user_name = '<user_name>';
Cheers,
Vignesh

Removing Not Assigned from the query

Hi,
I have one query, in which the data is displayed as shown below
Country         City          Amount
India           Mumbai        10000
                Delhi         10000
US              Los Angeles   20000
                New York      30000
Not Assigned    Sydney        80000
If I sort/descending on the Amount, I will get Sydney as a top. But the moment, I remove the city from the query, my output is displaying as mentioned below
Country        Amount
Not Assigned   80000
US             50000
India          20000
I need the help in displaying the output as mentioned below. (Basically, instead of Not Assigned, Syndey
should be displayed)
Country        Amount
Syndey            80000
US             50000
India          20000
Please help if any code / formula needs to be written, to acheive the above result.
Thanks & Regards
Ramesh Ganji

This can be acheived if you can save this query as a workbook and writing Excel Formulas.
You have to Insert a column and wirte a Formula like
( I am assuming column B is country and A is City and you have inserted column is A and the formula you are writing in the 10th row)
= IF(B10= "Not Assigned",C10,B10)
copy this formula to all the rows for the column A.
Now based on this column you can sort your report.(Excel sort).
Save the workbook.
Regs
Gopi
Assign points if it helps ....

Field "Not Assigned" in the Bex Query

Hi All,
I've build a query which target is a multi-provider ( 1 Cube + 1 ODS ).
My 2 InfoProvider are joined by 0material.
In my Query fields(from the ODS) are "Not Assigned" when displaying the result ?
Someone has an idea, plz ?
Thanks a lot,
Erwan.

Hello ErWaN,
How r u ?
Check this thread.... seems to be the same issue....
# and Unassigned - in BW Report
Best Regards....
Sankar Kumar

Selection screen value not assigning to the value when executed for the first time

Hi ,
Im My program at selection screen there are company code, vendor account and open items at key date(takes system date as default value).
Facing problem at open items at key date - Open key date parameter is taken from LDB - KDF.
First time when I am executing the program it is taking system date value in the selection screen variable even though I have given the different date.
This problem is only when I execute for first time or press enter without giving company code.
Can any one please help us to come out of this problem.
Regards
Sri Bhargavi

HI,
you can use the Event as AT SELECTION-SCREEN

Reporting Issue "Opening Balance values are going to Not Assigned Values"

Hi Friends,
Closing Balance values are perfectly showing but opening balance values are going to Not Assingned Values? I am not able to find it out.
our query is built on PCA Daily Multiprovider.
Pls Help.
Thanks
Asim

Hi Ravish,
Here are the details
Stock values and quantities in the PCA cube of BW never show correctly at an article level due to an opening balance issue. This reduces our ability to report on stocks at moving average price, i.e. anything that actually matches the financial values in the system. The issue arises because stock at the beginning of the year (quantity and value) for any site is only shown against an article of "Not assigned." Stock movements during the year are shown against the appropriate article.(If you have a new site, the will have stock assigned against an article up until 31 December and then the 31 December values are shown against "not assigned" for the next year).
Thanks
Asim

Vendor not assigned to PR when doing a MRP run

I am doing an MRP run for creating purchase requistions
However the vendor is not getting assigned to the PR.
I have the vendor defined in the source list (made it fixed) and also created info record.
However when i run the MRP the PR is created but the vendor is not assigned to the PR.
Also how can create the PO automatically from the MRP ?
Also where can i see the time frame setting for Processing PR to PO?
Thanks

Dears,
I'm faced to the same kind of problem...
The process is an inter-company PR.
The MRP of our plant creates PR for the other plant, these PR are type "MFS" (because of customizing with the tcode OPPR, in order to manage MRP group in the material sheet MRP1)
We have maintained the info-record and the source list, and the extra-purchasing view of the vendor (the plant we send the PR).
When we launch the MRP, the systems creates the PR and we get them in the dynamical status of stock (tcode MD04). In this list, the vendor well appears on the rigth of the screen. So, it seems that the source list is well managed
BUT, when we have a look into the PR (tcode ME53N), the vendor doesn't appear in the source list sheet. :-((
Please, tell me what could be the reason of this stange fact ? (the field is not invisble customized...)
FYI, we get the same result with material without MRP group, and PR type NB
Thanks for your support,
BR,
Tony

Strategy escalation not appearing in the escalation node of UWQ.

Hi,
Module: Advanced Collections
Customer has done the following test case:
There are three work items in the collection strategy. First two work items are automatic and completed successfully. Third work item is manual and need to be escalated to manager, if it is not closed within time limit.
Escalation for third Work Item has been setup. On the expiry of the time limit, system sends a email notification to the manager of the collector but this escalation is not appearing in the escalation node of the collectors work queue.
Checked the collections implementation guide and found the following:
"In the Escalation section, enter Yes and a closure time if you want an "automatic"
notification sent to the collector’s manager if the work item is not completed in the
specified time period"
It has not specified whether the escalation appears in the workqueue node of the manager.
I would like to know whether the escalations should appear in the escalation work queue node or is this an intended functionality.
Thanks and regards,
Hareesh

Hareesh,
As I see the work items a resource after esclation will only in the escalated node but not in the queue of the manager.
My requirement was to show the UQW items of the subordinates of a manager in the UWQ apart from his own. I am not sure the R11.10 and above with some patch levels has that functionality out of the box, but I had to change the metadata view defnition to show that info in the UWQ.
Going back to your question, escalations use task architecture. As the task owner is still the resource who holds the task of completing it, the task is not "assigned" to the manager but just a mail is sent keeping in the different bucket.
Hence that **May** not show in the manager queue. But if you change the metadata views, you can show all of my subordinates tasks to the manager as well which includes the escalations.
You can try using the task escalations screen to reassign the owner to be manager thus taking the task out my list and showing it up in my manager's list.
I have not tested this but you can try this option and use as a process step.
Thanks
Nagamohan

FSV not assigned accounts in Report Painter

Hi
I created one report through Report painter for Balance display.
After Execution of the report in Drilldown many Balance sheet G/Ls are showing as not assigned in the report.
As they are assigned in the Financial statement version.The G/Ls not assigned are the Balance Sheet G/L.
Thanks

Hi,
Can you please check the financial statement version which might have been included in the general data section of the report or the column characteristics. Also check the row element/ cell element defination.
Regards,
Gaurav

Problems with CIF (Logical system not assign to BSG)

Hello,
We are sending all master data from ECC to APO. We set up the CIF in DEV and all worked fine. But when we try to send the data from ECC to APO in QA an error appears. It says that the logical system is not assign in the BSG. Apparently the configuration that we have in DEV is the same that we have in QA. The logical systems in all instances (DEV & QA) have the same name. Could this be the problem?
Thanks,
David

Hi David,
1) Check whether BSG is defined in customisation under the below
link
SAP - Implementation Guide > Integration with SAP Components
     > Integration via APO Core Interface (CIF)    >
    Basic Settings for Creating the System Landscape   > Maintain Business System Group
2) Check the BSG is assinged to the logical system under the
spro transaction
SAP - Implementation Guide > Integration with SAP Components
     > Integration via APO Core Interface (CIF)    >
    Basic Settings for Creating the System Landscape   >
Assign Logical System and Queue Type
3) Check BSG is showing in APO material master for a location
product under "Properties" tab.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

G/l account not assigned to chart of account

Hi all,
While GR I am getting an error message.
G/l Account for the particular material type (e.g. Trading goods Val Class=3100 & G/l Acct 301000) not assigned to
the chart of accts.
Actually this error is only with this material type and not with others.
The particular G/l Acct is not created in the company code.
I have tried to create that G/l Acct using T.Co. FS00 but in vain. Because some error occurring.
So how to create G/l acct for that mat type and how to assign that to the chart of accts
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Check configuration whether your valuation class assigned propertly..
1.OMSK: valuation Class with Account catagory reference,
2.OMWM: Active Valuation Grouping Code,
3.OMWN: Active Movement type with G/L account,
4.OMWD: Active Valuation Area,
5.OMWB: Active Chart of account,Valuation Grouping Code,Account Grouping Code,Valuation Class and G/L acocounts
Regards,
BK

Partner Function Check while changing partner Functions not assigned to SP

Dear All,
I have created a Partner profile and its working fine.
But recently there was a problem reported, where in the User changed the Bill to Party at the Sales order header which was not defiend in the Customer Master, this Bill to Customer was defined in the same sales Area as the Order was.
The Problem is it was a typo error by teh user while modifying the default Bill To. They realsied it only after the Invocie was sent to a different payer.
Could we have a check built in where the system pops up error when we choose a partner function which is not assigned in the Customer master??
And to my surpise now I noticed that its allowing me to enter any Bill to and payer Partned which is defined in the Sales Area as the Sales Order is.
I expect to have someting in teh customisation to give up a error.
Thansk for all your help.

System will accept any SH/PY/BP in same sale area to put in sale order, this is the std functionality.
In order to change this u need to use Userexit.
In MV45AFzz and Include in USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE you can have the same logic to put error while PY/SH/BP not in CMR.
Sam

Order unit not assigned

Hi All,
we have a B.doc with error "order unit 'C' is not assigned to the product".when we check the product in r/3 and crm the base unit and order units are same and they are ( ex: A & B ). actually what we feel is, the order unit C is not related to this product.
can anybody please help in solving this issue.

Hi,
You mean to say that I need to downlaod the object DNL_CUST_BASIS3 and then reprocess the idocs
Thanks,
Murli

FF713 - Taxcode not assigned to the TAXINN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for