FG Actually dates requirement

Dear All,
I am facing one problem, first for your information i have maintained the following inputs in material master.
For Finished Good (FERT)
in-house production time = 5 days
For dependent component
Planned delivery time = 5 days
Now suppose if we feed the order in md01 on 16.12.2011, then the order report after MRP run in md04 generated shows dependent materials requirement date as 11.12.2011 , but i don't want requirement date to be display i want component delievery date as per material master which should be on 22.11.2011 as i have feed the order today. if this is possible then what i will do i will release the planned order to production order and will make FG ready till 27.11.2011
This way i will serviced the FG before the final deadline of 16.12.2011
Please provide me a good solution

Phalgun,
It is not clear what your expectation is.
You say that for Finished goods, you have a planned order. The finish date is Dec 16.
You say that for Component part, you have a dependent requirement (from the FG planned order) of Dec 11.
If you run MRP against the component part (will assume the component part does not use consumption MRP logic, and assume the component part is externally procured), you will get a purchase req which has a completion date of December 11 and a release date of Dec 6. These are the dates you must meet in order to finish the FG planned order on Dec 16.
Now you mention another date: Nov 22. I don't know what this represents. However, if you have created a purchase req for the component, which has a finish date of Nov 22, and you wish to start the FG order early, e.g. on Nov 22, then just change the planned order for the FGs accordingly (earlier date). Alternatively, you can just change the date when you convert the planned order to a production order.
Or, if I have misunderstood your question, please explain in greater detail.
Best Regards,
DB49

Similar Messages

Report to display (actuals data from one cube and plan from another)

Hi Gurus,
         I have a requirement in reporting to display actual data from one cube and plan data from a different one.
        The example below might give a clear picture of the requirement.
rows has key figures and columns = months
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun ...   ....
GrossSales
Net Sales
Now if I run the report for Current month (Apr), then for the months of (Jan, Feb and Mar) i need to get the data from CUBE1   and for the remaining months (Apr thru Dec) from CUBE2.
Similarly when i run the report next month(may),
then (data for Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr from CUBE1)
and ( May thru Dec from CUBE2)
Any suggestions.
Thanks in Advance
Kumar

Hi Henry,
     We alreadey have a multi provider which includes
FinDat Cube(CUBE1) for actuals and Comm.Goals cube (CUBE2) for plan.
So you suggest that we have two versions of key figure for actual and plan.
ie. each KF will have two versions.
actuals = (version 10, FiscPer<curr.mnth, key figure, acutals cube)
Plan = (version 20, FiscPer>=curr.mnth, key figure, comm.goals cube)
eg:
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun ...
GrossSales(Act)
GrossSlaes(Plan)
Net Sales(Acutal)
Net Sales(Plan)
Correct me if I am wrong.
the report has a lot of key figures, having two versions for each kf will be confusing.
the user would like to see
Jan.....| ...Feb |..Mar |..Apr.....| May |
GrossSales   Act Value|Act.V |Act.V| PlanVal|PlanVal|
Net Sales
where Act.Value is from CUBE1
         Plan Value is from CUBE2
Thanks
Kumar

Original dates in comparison of actual dates

Hi Experts
I have a project with certain activities and partily executed (few activities are confirmed and partially confirmed).
For the finally confirmed activities, the planned earliest and latest dates if activity are matched with actual dates.
To have an analysis of planned and actual dates, how to retain the original dates?
Over a period of time, i have incerted new activities. To enable bringing these activities in schedule, i need to re-schedule the project.
But, the origjnal schedule also will get rescheduled. I am looking for retaining the original schedule despite repeated reschedules for the purpose of future analysis.
Generally, the project progress in gantt chart (general business requirement) is monitored with out deviating the original schedule.
Require comments by experts.
warm regards
ramSiva

Hi Mahendra
My scheduling scenario is bottom up, because the individual activities and procurement lead times will decide the actual planning for each WBS.
So, as you suggested, once after complete structuring and initial scheduling, i will transfer the basic dates to forecast dates.
Then onwards i will keep reschedule after confirmation / partial confimation / addition of new activities. Is this method keeps the forecast dates unchanged forever and gives information on iniital schedule?
During intermittent rescheduling, will the forecast dates get affected as like basic dates (due to my scenario bottom-up)?
warm regards
ramSiva

Input Ready Query needs Actual Data too

Hi Gurus
Our customer requires last 3 months of actual data for reference on the Input Ready Queries, to plan . They need to see last 3 months actuals when they start seeing planning season.
Is it a good option to show actual and Input enabled plan piece together.
We can build a MultiProvider and Build the Agg levels.
Pls advice if this would be a best practice or should we create a WAd Dash board showing 3 months actuals in one column of the Table lay out and allow the In put ready query in another column.
Please advice
Points would be awarded .

Hi,
You can easily achieve by providing the Plan data and Actual data in two different worksheets of the work book.
First, create an aggregation level on the plan cube and then an input ready query on this aggregation level.
Then create one more query on the actual cube(agg level is not needed as input readiness is not required).
In the Analyzer, open the first query in the first worksheet. Then create one more worksheet, create a data provider in the design mode and embed the second query.
The user can see the actuals in the second sheet and can plan on the firsst sheet.
Hope this will resolve your problem.
Thanks and Regards,
Srinivas Kamireddy.

Suppress cumulated key figures for actual data

Hello all,
I have build a query which display monthly actual and forecast order income for an ficsal year. The fiscal year starts in July and end in June
The forecast data were loaded in BW over an flat file for the whole fiscal year. The actual data gets loaded daily from R/3.
When I run the query and select the whole fiscal year and displayed the key figures as "cumulated" in the query properties, I can see all the cumulated forecast values (for 12 months) but the actual order income data just cumulated till the current month (December). For the next months (until June) always the last value from December remains.
I want to provide a line diagram in a Web Application, which shows the forecast and the actual data. Right now the line for the actual data stops to raise at the current period and gets continued as a horizontal line till the end of the fiscal year.
Therefore my question is: Is it possible to suppress values for actual data for the next periods in order to end the actual order income data line in the diagram at the current month.
Any ideas would be great.
Best regards from Munich,
Stefan

The one thing I can think of would require a very messy way of doing things, but it would probably work.
If you created a set of calculated/restricted key figures for each period of the fiscal year (non-cumulated), you could also have a set that cumulates up to each period. Then, in the calculation, you can set the stipulation that if period x is not > 0, then don't sum that particular colum. Then, supress columns that don't have any data in the structure properties. I think you'd end up with 24 columns, 12 hidden, and some that won't display depending on which values exist.

Insert actual date and time

Hi forum,
I want to know if it is possible to insert for example like a field more but hidden the actual date and time, like in abap we use sy-datum...
The attribute visible of a inputfield:
visible Use this attribute to determine whether the input field should be visible or invisible, that is, whether or not the BSP element should be rendered in the BSP.
For example: visible = "X" ¿? (default¿?)
And to generate automatically what i have to do¿?
Thanks and regards!
Mon.
PD: Anybody knows any idea or suggestion about my last topic (tableview-onpinputprocessing)¿

Hi Eddy,
Finally i have used:
      <htmlb:inputField id             = "campo_fecha"
                         type           = "date"
                         required       = "true"
                         size           = "10"
                         showHelp       = "X"
                         value          = "<%= sy-datum %>"
                         visible        = "false" />
Thanks indeed for ur answer...
Regards,
Mon

Actual dates should not impact the Network scheduled dates

Hi
I have planned schdeuled dates (Early/latest).
When i am confirming the activity the actual dates get updated
When i schedule the network the scheduled planned dates are recalulated
This should not happen for this client i am working for
The requirement is that the Planned Scheduled should remain fixed and
should only change if duration, relationship etc changes.
I have tried different option to solve this but still no clue
Adjust basic date 1, 2, 3 option
Shift Order
No date Update - this seems to work but not visible in CN22/CN25/CJ20n
Kindly highlight if any of you have come with similar requirement & provided solution to it
Either thru standard functionality, configuration or any development
Cheers

Hi Manoj,
I had the same requirement and able to achieve it by std. settings. Keep in mind that the planned dates wil get changed when you do the final confirmation. You should have the control on the planned dates until the activity get Fianlly confirmed.
psconsultant

Bw to BPC actuals Data load

Hello Experts,
Here is the scenario I need to views.
1)I am trying to load Actuals data from BW to BPC and there is one Infoobject whose display attribute's value is required to be loaded to dimension.
Currently I am trying with static conversion file where in I have given the IO and its attribute value in external and internal respectively.
MAPPING
Dimension = BW Info Object.
Can anybody tell me if there is some other better workaround for this situation.
2) Second issue is while I try to validate the transformation file with BW IP it gives error saying: "validation with Data file Failed".
I have tried giving selections for the record value where no field have blank value in cube. Not sure what the reason is.
Regards,
Kavita

Hi,
Transformation mapping based on Display attribute may not work. As per the below note Navigational attribute is not supporting in lower version. But you can give a try if you are in BPC 10.
1455947 - Transformation mapping to a Navigational Attribute
Thanks,
Raju

When we get the actual data in BPC for planning, is the data consolidated

I had a question regarding Planning. When we get the actual data in BPC for planning, is the data consolidated? Do we need to run the consolidation business rules( IC Booking, Matching, IC Eliminations) on the data before we can use it for planning? Per my understanding we have to run Currency Conversion on this...correct?
Also, where do I get my actual data from? Does ECC/ Source system have data from all entities( CHQ, Region and Countries)?
Please help!
Thanks in advance

Hi Kimi,
In a hierarchical structure, the data is always loaded in to the base level, and the data is automatically rolled up to its parents.
The currency conversion will also take place at the base level, and as mentioned earlier, the converted data will also be rolled up as per the hierarchy.
The heading of this thread says planning. So, ideally, there wont be any legal (or statutory) consolidation. You might use the US elimination however, for eliminating the intercompany transactions, if any.
The planning can be done as zero based (wherein the user has to enter the planned data manually from scratch) or non-zero based (wherein the planned data of previous year is copied and the user can change the data as required).
The flow of events cannot be suggested by us. It has to be discussed with the business to understand how do they do the planning.
Hope this helps.

Actual data different during confirmation

Hi all
I confirmed first operation with yield of 800pc out of production order of 1000 pc and put 200pc as scrap. Now during confirmation of second operation the actual data should be 800 for yield but the system showing 1000pc. What are the settings that system will show as required.
Regards
roshan

Hi,
Pl. check ur entries in "Parameters for order confirmation - opk4". In the control data tab, check ur entry in " generated confirmations without qty. adjustments".
If don't set that indicator, then the scrap qty. will be taken into account.
Regards,
Jeyaraman.R

Copy actual data to plan version

Dears,
I have a requirement wherein business has maintained plan data for balance sheet GLs in GP12N for version 1 for 6 months. Now the requirement is to copy actual data of first 6 months to next 6 months in version 2 (forecast) and start comparing actual/plan/forecast. I tried copying in FAGLGP52N, but it allows only from plan version to another plan version.
Please suggest if there is a way to copy actual data to plan version.
I have another requirement to display plan version data of cost element (PL) which we maintain in KP06/7KE1 in F.01.
Thanks,
Lokesh

Try to use Plan version (000) where the Actual values are posted in this version.
Cheers,
Sarhan.

Activity without date type "Actual Date"

Hi experts,
Does anybody use activities without date type "Actual Date"(000000000002)?
I created a new date profile and assigned it to a transaction type,
then warning message "Date type "Actual Date" does not exist in the activity
" (CRM_APPOINTMENT062) occurs.
The message was origninally created by note 428436.
The note describes "certain date types are required in the reporting and for the index update".
I don't know what is "the reporting and for the index update".
I'm afraid if something bad happens without the date type.
Regards,
Fukuhara Yohei

Hi,
Whenever activity (or any other one oder document) is created, an entry will be made in CRMD_ORDER_INDEX table. When system looks for the transactions, it first checks if a corresponding entry is there in this or not. That's why indexing is improtant for effective search to happen.
So the note means that in absence of Actual Date date type, system may lead to improper update of the index table and also reporting of activities may be affected.
Regds,
Raghu

Scheduling after entering Actual dates

Dear Members,
I have a scenario where I want to reschedule the project after entering actual dates for the activity.
Lets say,
An activity was planned for Duration : 8 Days and work : 64 Hrs (Capacity is 8 hrs/day)
20.05.2009 to 28.05.2009
Now I am confirming the activity for the first time after say 4 days work :
20.05.2009 to 24.05.2009
but the work done is only 16 hrs.
Now the remaining work is 48 hrs in only 4 days.
Requirement is that... scheduling should shift the dates of the activity according to capacity and remaining work.
48 hrs can be completed in 6 days... so the finish date of activity should be increased by 2 days... from 28.05.2009 to 30.05.2009.
I hope I have put my requirement in a meaningful way... please help me on this...
(I know that instead of increasing the dates and delaying the project, it is recommended to overload the capacity and finish the activity withing the planned duration.. but I cant increase the capacity...)

Dear Amol,
I have come across the same business requirement in one of the project implementation.
So I had given a logic to my ABAPer to calculate the forecast duration and automatically bring the value in the internal activity screen.
The user exit used was CONFPS04, there is an include available where you can out the code for this enhancement.
Hence, whenever you will do the confirmation, as per the calculation you have given in your example, system will calculate & update the forecast duration field. Now, everytime you will do the scheduling, on the basis of the value in the forecast duration, system will schedule the project.
Regards,
Vikas D.

Not getting 'actual data' in the planning query

Hi all,
I am debug other's query. This cube stores 'actual' and 'plan' data and I loaded 'actual' and can see it in the cube. But I cannot see 'actual data' when I run the planning query.
I checked all restrictions in the KFs and CHARs and fliters in the query. There are only 'value type 10', 'fiscal year variant Z1', and 'currency CAD' restricted and actual data does contain those values in all line items.
Can someone point it out what it could be the issue? Thank you.
R.

Hi,
if you enter some data (plan data) you cannot see it again. Is that correct?
are you using the same query to enter and to see plan data?
Because if you are entering data in an aggregate level and you are executing your query over the infocube you will not see the data from the yellow request. If you execute query over the aggregate you should be able to see all data in the cube (yellow and green requests).
Also check if your query is defined as per note 1136163.
I hope this helps.
Lucimar

How to differentiate b/w Plan and actual data

Hi,
How to differentiate b/w plan nad actual data.
Is that value type or Version InfoObject??
What should be the value for that and how it gets populated ??
Regards,

Hello Tapan,
The plan and actual data is differentiated on the basis of value of infoobject 0VTYPE. Value 10 is for actual. Different plan versions can be differentiated by different values of infoobject 0VERSION.
These values are populated when actual data is loaded or plan data is entered.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Praveen

FG Actually dates requirement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for