FI AP AR PCA

Hi,
Can anybody help me with some BW documents on FI AP, FI AR and PCA other than help links.
Thanks.

Hi J B,
Go through these Doc's.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a7f2f294-0501-0010-11bb-80e0d67c3e4a
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/fb07ab90-0201-0010-c489-d527d39cc0c6
Check these links for COPA Extraction.
For COPA:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?query=copa%20extraction%20step%20%20by%20step&cat=sdn_all
FOR FI/CO:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?cat=sdn_all&query=fi%2fco+extraction&adv=false&sortby=cm_rnd_rankvalue
copa extraction: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/fb07ab90-0201-0010-c489-d527d39cc0c6
copa retraction: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1910ab90-0201-0010-eea3-c4ac84080806
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sapportals.km.docs/documents/a1-8-4/how%20to%20set%20up%20connection%20co-pa%20-%20extraction
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sapportals.km.docs/documents/a1-8-4/how%20to%20set%20up%20connection%20co-pa%20-%20retraction
Also
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c9/fe943b2bcbd11ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
For FI_GL its very normal u can find good explanation in
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/57/dd153c4eb5d82ce10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Also Refer this link:
http://www.sap-img.com/business/lo-cockpit-step-by-step.htm
FI-CO 'Data Extraction -Line Item Level-FI-CO
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a7f2f294-0501-0010-11bb-80e0d67c3e4a
FI-GL
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c9/fe943b2bcbd11ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/e1/8e51341a06084de10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
http://www.sapgenie.com/sapfunc/fi.htm
FI-SL
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/28/5ccfbb45b01140a3b59298c267604f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/41/65be27836d300ae10000000a114b54/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ee/cd143c5db89b00e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
FI related transparent Tables
BSID / BSAD ===> AR
BSIK / BSAK ===> AP
GLT0 ===> GL
The best way to find all the list of data sources available is go to R/3 transaction LBWE and then open the sub tree under Purchasing or Sales and Distribution or FI.
FI-AP
0FI_AP_1 Vendors: Transaction figures
0FI_AP_3 Vendors: Line Items
0FI_AP_4 Vendors: Line Items with Delta Extrcation
0FI_AP_6 Vendor Sales Figures via Delta Extraction
0FI_AP_7 Vendor SGL Sales Figures using Delta Extraction
FI-AR
0DPM_0 Dispute Management: Transaction Data
0DPM_DEBITOR Dispute Management: Business Partner
0FI_AR_1 Customers: Transaction figures
0FI_AR_10 Customer Payment Behavior via Delta Extraction
0FI_AR_3 Customers: Line Items
0FI_AR_4 Customers: Line Items with Delta Extraction
0FI_AR_5 Customers: Payment History
0FI_AR_6 Customer Sales Figures via Delta Extraction
FI-GL
0ACAC_CALC Manual Accruals: Calculated Accrual Values
0ACE_CALC_RESULT Accrual Engine: Calculated Accrual Values
0FI_GL_1 General ledger: Transaction figures
0FI_GL_10 General Ledger: Leading Ledger Balances
0FI_GL_2 General ledger: Transaction figures - Cost of sales ledger
0FI_GL_4 General Ledger: Line Items with Delta Extraction
0FI_GL_6 General Ledger Sales Figures via Delta Extraction
0FI_GL_7 General Ledger Cost of Sales Ledger via Delta Extraction
0FI_GL_8 General Ledger: Statistical Key Figures
0FI_TX_4 Taxes: Line Items by Means of Delta Extraction
GL Queries
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/57/dd153c4eb5d82ce10000000a114084/frameset.htm
AR/AP
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/ee/cd143c5db89b00e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
PCA
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/7a/c3143c26b8bc00e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
CCA
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/8d/1f383fe58d5900e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Here you will get all General reports belongs to the given application wise
Hope This Helps.
Regards,
Ravikanth

Similar Messages

Re: How to Improve the performance on Rollup of Aggregates for PCA Infocube

Hi BW Guru's,
I have unresolved issue and our team is still working on it.
I have already posted several questions on this but not clear on how to reduce the time on Rollup of Aggregates process.
I have requested for OSS note and searching myself but still could not found.
Finally i have executed one of the cube in RSRV with the database selection
"Database indexes of an InfoCube and its aggregates" and got warning messages i was tried to correct the error and executed once again but still i found warning message. and the error message are as follows: (this is only for one info cube we got 6 info cubes i am executing one by one).
ORACLE: Index /BI0/IACCOUNT~0 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BI0/IPROFIT_CTR~0 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BI0/SREQUID~0 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BIC/D1001072~010 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BIC/D1001132~010 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BIC/D1001212~010 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BIC/DGPCOGC062~01 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BIC/IGGRA_CODE~0 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BIC/QGMAPGP1~0 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BIC/QGMAPPC2~0 has possibly degenerated
ORACLE: Index /BIC/SGMAPGP1~0 has possibly degenerated
i don't know how to move further on this can any one tell me how to tackle this problem to increase the performance on Rollup of Aggregates (PCA Info cubes).
every time i use to create index and statistics regularly to improve the performance it will work for couple of days and again the performance of the rollup of aggregates come down gradually.
Thanks and Regards,
Venkat

hi,
check in a sql client the sql created by Bi and the query that you use directy from your physical layer...
The time between these 2 must be 2-3 seconds,otherwise you have problems.(these seconds are for scripts that needed by Bi)
If you use "like" in your sql then forget indexes....
For more informations about indexes check google or your Dba .
Last, i mentioned that materialize view is not perfect,it help a lot..so why not try to split it to smaller ones....
ex...
logiacal dimensions
year-half-day
company-department
fact
quantity
instead of making one...make 3,
year - department - quantity
half - department - quantity
day - department - quantity
and add them as datasource and assign them the appropriate logical level at bussiness layer in administrator...
Do you use partioning functionality???
i hope i helped....
http://greekoraclebi.blogspot.com/
///////////////////////////////////////

PCA Manual Posting - Open/close posting periods

All,
Is there a way you can open or close PCA posting periods? The FI posting period control does not control the PCA manual posting. We need however to do this. Is there a way to do it. I know I can create a validation. But is there any other way?
Regards,

Hello,
here is the one and only correct answer for your question:
Unfortunately, there is no possibility to lock periods / posting
transactions in PCA (including distributions).
There are only two possibilities to prevent postings to profit centers:
1. is to completely lock them in the master data via transaction KE52 (tab 'Indicators' -> activate 'Lock indicator'. Please read also the F1-help here for the field 'Lock indicator')
2. to lock one complete fiscal year in the entire Profit-Center
Accounting via transaction 1KEF.
One important reason is that PCA receives its postings from preliminary applications like MM, CO, FI. Therefore, postings can only be locked in those applications (like in FI via TN OB52 or in CO via TN OKP1 or FI-SL via GCP1), but not directly in PCA.
Excpetions from that are described in the SAP notes 436384 and´836218 for manual postings made with transactions 1KEL and 9KE0. With the coding corrections of the both notes a period lock is possible for these two transactions.
It is not planned to have a general functionality of period locks in Profitcenter Accounting. PCA should be always open for postings. It is designed to be the receiving application of data delivered by the preliminary applications. Therefore period locks must be handled / maintained also in those applications.
Best regards,
Andreas

Open/Close periods in PCA

Dear all,
We do Balance Sheet and P+L statements in PCA, and Finance department wants to close PCA periods for manual corrections after period close (similar to FI). How it can be solved? There are no customizing in PCA for posting periods. I've also tried to close periods in FI-SL, but it has no effect on PCA documents.

>
sreekanth munipally wrote:
> Hi,
> Use transaction OKP1 for closing the period.
>
> Regards,
> Sreekanth
Hello Sreekanth
OKP1 locks only CO postings and has no effect on PCA. Technically, EC-PCA more close to FI-SL component than to CO.

Material and representative material in PCA

Hello all,
I have an issue concerning material numbers in Profit Center Accounting. My aim is to be able to report on material group (attribute on 0MATERIAL) in BW for both plan and actuals.
In R/3 PCA they plan on field "representative material". Furthermore they post actuals on "material" field.
Extractor 0EC_PCA_1 brings all postings (plan + actuals) to BW, but does not include the "material" field. It only includes the "representative material" field, so I'm missing the possiblity to see the actuals per material number.
Extractor 0EC_PCA_3 brings all actual postings to BW and includes the "material number". However the representative field is not filled (since this is only actuals)
So I get what I need into BW, but in two different extractors (and also on two different aggregation levels).
I somehow need to merge the information of these two extractors. Is it a multi cube I should use here? Or should I rather try to modify 0EC_PCA_1 by adding the material number in an append structure? I actually tried this, but I still couldn't find the new field in the extractor. So I guess this is not possible here and that I have to go for the multi cube solution?
I need to get both the "representative material" and the "material" into info object "0MATERIAL" since the material group is an attribute of that. Could this work if I modify the update rules in cube 0PCA_C01 (this is filled with records from 0EC_PCA_1) so that repr. material points at 0MATERIAL (for plan values) and at the same time use cube 0PCA_C03 (this is filled with records from 0EC_PCA_3) which uses 0MATERIAL as standard (for the actuals).
I'd be extremely thankful for some ideas/help...
Thanks in advance!
best regards,
Fredrik

Hi Fredrik,
Some questions:
Is there a 1 on 1 relation between repr. mat. and material?
Do you have PCA_1 as Totals or Line Items?
If you want to report on material group you somewhere have to have a relation between repr. material and mat. group.
Of course you can always map the rep. into 0MATERIAL, but you MD has to be correct too.
And: Adding in PCA extractors is difficult!

Opening and Cumulated Balances of PCA

Dear BI Gurus,
I am using two standard (PCA) Data Sources
<b>1. 0EC_PCA_3 and
2. 0EC_PCA_4</b> to Load data into my Custom Cube.I need Cumulated balance and Opening Balance of Actual Line Items for my reporting purpose.
There is an object 0BALANCE which is not getting populated from the 0EC_PCA_3 Data Source.
We are able to get only the Cumulated Balances of Periodic Transfer, but unable to get the Balances of all the other Accounts.
So, can anyone please help me out in getting the Cumulated Balances and Opening Balances of the Account Numbers.
With regards

For Delta update
The extract structure does not contain the BALANCE field. To get the inventory for balance sheet account, 0BALANCE can be filled in BW in den updating rules. For further information, see note 577644.
Or you can do full load
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5d/ac7d8082a27b438b026495593821b1/content.htm
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

1KEK and 1KEI Difference between FI and PCA KE5U

Hello All,
We have a difference between our FI and PCA and that is shown when we run the Transaction KE5U.
we have a calendar year with 4 special periods as our fiscal year and 12 2010 was the last normal period
The business made some postings in period 13 during their year end close.
These postings in periof 13 2010 are not shown in PCA.
I have tried the following
Ran 1KEK and 1KEI for period 13 => System response: You cannot run these transactions for special periods
Ran 1KEK and 1KEI for Period 12 => The difference still exist.
I dont think we can open period 12 2010 again as the fiscal year 2010 is closed.
Is there a different way to run these transactions and reconcile the balance?
Please advice
Subhani

We figured it out.
we had to perform the following steps in sequence to resolve the issue
1KEK and 1KEH should be run periodically, every time we run the previous month we have to run it for all the proceesing months
1. Ran 1KEH and 1KEK for Dec 2010 => this will transfer all the postings made in the special periods of 2010
2. PCA balance carry forward 2KES
3. 1KEH and 1KEK for Jan 2011 and Feb 2011 in sequence.
Thanks

Billing doc cost PCA versus GL

The billing doc cost should be different for the PCA posting versus the GL posting. We have transfer pricing activated as well as material ledger. On the material master the standard price for legal valuation is different than profit center valuation and that is fine. When the billing doc posts it uses standard price for legal valuation for the GL posting. It should use standard price for profit center valuation. It uses legal valuation instead. Goods issue does use the correct standard price for GL versus PCA though.
How do I make the billing doc use the correct standard price ( profit center valuation ) for PCA?

Hi,
I am a bit confuesed on scenario explained by you and I am tring to restate the same:
1. You are using Transfer Pricing and Material Ledger is active.
2. You have different prices updated in Standard Price for Legal and Profit Center Valuations respectively.
3. When you make a goods issue, the system uses the Standard Price in the Legal Valuatoin for accounting.
4. You need the system to use Profit Center Valuation Price for accounting.
Opinion.
The Goods issue as updated in the Financial Accounting should use only the Legal Valuation values. The Profit Center Document anyhow will have the cost of sales based on the profit center valuation. This is by design and correct approach.
If your question is related to values posted in Profitability Analysis. You need to activate profit center valuation in PA and then you will see that both values flow to Profitability Analysis.
Hope this helps you.
Varadharajan

Sales order PCA to be updated in WBS elemnet

Hi Experts,
Can you please help me on below:
We have PS and SD, we will create project for additonal work. we will create sales order and assign the project at line item level till here no issues.
We are using sales order substitution (Materi PCA with Territory) - this updates the PCA from substituion no issues.
We need this Profit center for our downsteame reports.
But when we assign WBS to sales order the PCA is getting updated from WBS, i know this is standard SAP.
But we dont want to distrub the Profit center on sales order we need the same value in Project also.
can we achieve this automatically.
Updataing the Profit center of sales order in project - can any one provide some inputs.
Thanks,
Sudha

Hi
Your WBS is created independant of the Sales Order.. So you can use Validation and not substitution in my opinion
Either add a User status profile so that the person who releases the WBS also ensures correct PC on the WBS... The WBS shall not allow any transactions till then
Another option is to use MV45AFZB exit in SD to check the PC in WBS is the same as in Sales Order
I would prefer a process control and not the exit
br, Ajay M

GL not appearing in PCA report S_ALR_87013336

Dear Experts,
For acct XXXX, there's balance & we can view line item thru FI (tcode: FBL4N). We can see PC been assigned to those line items, but the GL XXXX not reflecting in PCA report (tcode S_ALR_87013336).
GL XXXX is a Balance Sheet GL (not a Reconciliation GL). This GL is not added to 3KEH. There are other GLs too, which are not added to 3KEH, but still those are appearing in PCA report S_ALR)87013336.
If you can please advice about this discrepancy.
Regards,
Hussein.
Edited by: Hussein Merchant on Apr 18, 2011 5:05 PM

After adding 'trip type expenses in the layout' in the layout, save the layout as a variant and give it a name.
Next time when you run the report, put that variant and then run
Values will come

T_Code 1KEK - Transferring Receivables and Paybles to PCA

Hi SAPients,
We normally do the transfer of Receivables and Paybles to PCA through T-code 1KEK as a period end closing process. Now something strange is happening which was never before. While transferring the Receivables and Paybles through 1KEK, all the line items are getting transferred to Dummy profit Centre rather the respective ones which is resulting in the mismatch in basic ledger and comparision ledger in T-code GCAC ( Ledger Comparision ). Can any body explain why it is happening and where the dummy profit centre is getting picked from for 1KEK?
Thanks,
BABA

Hi,
The following needs to be done.
1) Ensure you have assigned all B/S accounts in 3KEH.
2)Execute F.5D (Calculate Balance Sheet Adjustment)
3) Execute F.5E (Post Balance Sheet Adjustment) (mark the option "Post to profit center")
4) Execute 1KEK.
Regards,
Assign points if useful.

Posting to Production Order Field during WIP Calc in Classic Ledger FI/PCA

During our weekly Work In Process Calculation job (SAP Transaction KKAO) the following journal entry posts correctly per our company's SAP configuration:
Debit/Credit Work In Process Change (Income Statement)
Debit/Credit Work in Process Inventory (Balance Sheet)
When the entry posts in the Financial Accounting and Profit Center Accounting Modules within the Classic Ledger, the Order field (BSEG-AUFNR, GLPCA-AUFNR) is not being populated with the Production Order number. Instead it is going into a Text field. An example of the current behavior is below.
Itm PK Account    Account short text   Amount Text
1 40 530000     WIP Change                9.59 ORD 12345678
2 50 132000     WORK IN PROCESS    9.59- ORD 12345678
The other Production Order transactions such as labor confirmations and finished good deliveries populate the aforementioned Order fields and have no Text entry.
I would like the WIP calculation transaction to populate the Order fields in the Financial Accounting and Profit Center Accounting Postings. How can I make this happen within the SAP configuration?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Roman

Hi,
old PCA report painter reports can be migrated to NewGL reports under certain circumstances (see SAPNET note 1555535 for details).
As the NewGL PC reporting bases on the data available in the new GL tables FAGLFLEX* I think that you will miss some infos in NewGL PC reporting compared to infos available in classic PCA reporting (eg object type / object class).
Nevertheless it is possible to add fields toFAGLFLEX* but I doubt that this will be helpful in your case.
BR Christian

Goods Movement 351 not posting to PCA

For our new plant implentation, we create STO (ME23N), GI - 351 movement type, and GR - 101. No sales order, No delivery. Also 101 GR doesnt create financial document.
at good issue 351 movement type :
inv FG     13300100 Cr
inv FG     13300100 Dr
For good receipt, 101 there is no financial document.
However we are not able to extend this to PCA documents. the PCA settings for internal goods transfer are the following: 0kek
Mat type   Valcl     VGCd    No receiver rec   Internalrec     Chg.stock         DelfromPrCTR
Zint           -           -                -                         40050100       50050500     50050500
materials of same valuation type on both plants.
We also use the lengthier GM 641 but this would pick up the above PCA positings using Delivery note as trigger. The following postings happen:
Document Cat.     Ref. Document     Ref. Doc. Line     Posting period     Profit Center     Partner Profit Ctr     Account Number     Acc.Text     In profit center local currency     Curr. Key of PrCtr LC
W     4910001880     1     9     8001-CFTBI     8007-HCGEN     11000000     Inv-FG     -583.20     USD
W     4910001880     2     9     8007-HCGEN     8001-CFTBI     11000000     Inv-FG     0.00     USD
W     4910001880     3     9     8007-HCGEN     8001-CFTBI     61000001     PPVDirMatl     583.20     USD
W     4910001880     4     9     8001-CFTBI     8007-HCGEN     40050100     Sales-IntraCo CCS     -583.20     USD
W     4910001880     5     9     8001-CFTBI     8007-HCGEN     50050500     Cost of Sales-IntraC     583.20     USD
W     4910001880     6     9     8007-HCGEN     8001-CFTBI     50050100     c/s-Intra.CCS Receiv     583.20     USD
W     4910001880     7     9     8007-HCGEN     8001-CFTBI     50050500     Cost of Sales-IntraC     -583.20     USD
                                        0.00     USD
The only difference in the configuration is at OMWN:
GM Splstockdesc    Val. Update    Qty Update    Mvt Ind*    ConsumAccnt Val.String C TEKey    Accnt Modi
101    -                        -                       -                   B                  A                    WE06      1   KBS
101    -                        -                       -                   B                  A                    WE06      3   KDM      ERA
351    -                        -                       -                   -                   E                    WA04      2   PRD       PRU
351    -                        -                       -                   -                  E                    WA04        5 GBB     VKA
641 E                                                                     L                   E                   WA04       2   PRD       PRU
641   E                                                                    L                    E                   WA04      5 GBB     VKA
Its todo with material indicatior but i think other conditions apply. Any ideas how to get PCA postings using 351.
Would appreciate a quick response.

Hi Sharath
Maybe you have already check it, but here it goes, are you sure the material master have a profit center assigned ?
I did a transfer using mov 301 and it has posted fine.
Regards

Quantity field not getting update in PCA document for Goods Receipt

We have the Purchase Account activated for our company code.
For movement type 101 (Goods Receipt), I am getting the quantity field updated for GR/IR account and Stock Account (B/S item).
But the quantity field is not getting updated for the "Purchase Account" and the "other offsetting PL A/C).
Please advice whether I am missing something.
Regards
B.Mohanty

Hi Aravind,
Check SAP notes 1063198 and 1117587.
FAGLL03 display quantity which is updated in FAGLFLEXA, BSEG is not
relevant in this case. This is clearly explained in the note 1063198.
The quantity posts through to FI on the 'goods receipt' items, but not on the
'invoice receipt' items.
In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
is more related to the MM area.
But in the old 'Profit Center Accounting' and the old' Special Ledger'
the field has been important.
As the same logic of these areas to 'store' the Quantity is also used
in the NewG/L the field get only filled in the line, where it make
'sense' from our point of view, because only in the 'goods receipt'
lines a 'real' Quantity is posted to the system.
So as before in the PCA and SL, now also in the NewG/L the Quantity is
filled in the correct and important lines and postings.
In the BSEG ('old document segment table') the field is filled 'just'
as it is send to the FI, but this is not completely correct from the
business point of view.
This can also lead to issues with the reporting and summation to this
field. So with creating the new logic in the NewG/L the 'correct'
standard of the 'writing' for the Quantity has also been taken over.
So in the end, the update and display is correct according SAP standard behavior.
Actually,Quantities within G/L are never reliable,
because the purpose of FI is a view on the data according to amount
but not according to quantity.
In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
is more related to the MM area.
I hope I could be of assistance.
Regards,
Fernando

Cost Element missing in FAGLFLEXT for some PCA Plan records

Hi Gurus,
We have uploaded a PCA plan and can see the same in GP12NA. I see the planned values (GLPL) in FAGLFLEXT from SE16 under the correct accounts for 0L ledger for the correct company code and the fiscal year. I noticed a difference in the data
1) For the revenue elements (11 and 12 Categories) the 'cost element' field is not getting populated in FAGLFLEXT. ('Account' is populated.) Is it expected?
2) We have a Z library report that was built on FAGLFLEXT. The report uses the cost element groups to pull in the data and hence the 'Actual Values' are pulled in the report but the 'Plan Values' are missing. (Because of point1)
Any pointers on how to fix this?Could you please suggest the places i would need to look to fix this?
(I've checked that the plan vesion is activated for 2011)
(The report has version Z2 as one of its parameters.)
Regards,
Erp.Warrior

Thanks a lot for your replies.
Waman: I've looked up the Note 983835 - NewGL planning: Cost element field (COST_ELEM) initial.
This note talks about the Cost element not getting populated during planning. My question / confusion is in my case, the cost element is getting populated for some of them and not getting populated only for cost elem category 11 and 12.
Is this note intended for this issue?
Ajay: I've tried re-planning and still found the same issue. Thanks for your inputs. I'll analyse about the Note that waman has referred to and then may be go to SAP as suggested by you.
Please let me know if any of you have any other suggestions as well.
Thanks
erp.warrior

Differences in FI & PCA Substitution

All,
I am primarily an SD consultant working on a small solution related to Goods Receipts and Profit Center Accounting.
After searching all the available forums with all sorts of keywords, no similiar issue could be found; hence posting this question hoping someone might propose a solution.
According to a posting requirement for goods receipt, we have activated an FI substitution to override accounts configured in OBYC. This works as expected but our main objective is to have the same account determination in PCA documents too. But the G/Ls determined in PCA doc are different because no corresponding substitution has been activated other than in FI. I tried a similar substitution in CO (OKC9) but the collection of fields is different from those of OBBH. Therefore looks like the logic of FI substitution cannot be replicated here.
With most of my experience in SD, I don't understand why account determination during goods receipt in FI should be different from that of PCA. And what needs to be done to determine the same G/L substitution in PCA as that in FI.
Can someone suggest how the G/L accounts can be kept same in both FI & PCA docs? All of your expert inputs are highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
KC

Reverted the G/L substitution in FI & instead opted to change the account keys dynamically during PO processing, using a pricing routine (condition value formula).

FI AP AR PCA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for