FI Summarization SD

Dear all,
we have the following business case:
Free-of-charge invoice for goods:
One position in the invoice
SD-Kondition A = Price      100,- EUR
SD-Kondition B = Discount -100,- EUR
SD-Invoice value = 0,- EUR
Condition A and B are assinged in CO-PA to the same value field, so the total in CO-PA is also 0,- EUR.
In FI we still receive posting lines:
Line 01 based on sd-condition A               credit revenue account           -100,- EUR
Line 02 based on sd-condition B               debit revenue account             100,- EUR
so in total the FI-posting is also 0,- EUR, but we want to <b>avoid the complete FI-posting</b>.
In view V_TTYPV (FI Summarization) we have defined the following settings for Ref. Transaction VBRK:
Table name             Field name
BSEG                   MATNR
BSEG                   PAOBJNR
How can we avoid the complete FI-posting if the total of the posting is 0,- and all other characteristicsa are also the same (the only difference is debit/credit)?
Thanks!
XmchX

HI,
check SAPNET note 36129 + related notes (33258,...) how to handle the invoice posting of free of charge deliveries.
The solution creates ONLY a CO-PA document but no FI document (as this is senseles, the revenue is zero).
best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

Difference on KE33 and Line item/summarization

Experts,
please help me.
We have cost based COPA report. Where the rows are defined as distribution channel (by type of sales, example whole sale, retail, inter-company etc) which is a characteristic and the columns are value fields (Gross rev, QTY etc).
We also have user defined characteristics for PH Product Hierarchy category which is linked to MVKE- PRODH.
A summarization level is defined @ Product hierarchy category and with other values.
Now my problem is, when I ran the KE33/KE30 report the gross value is less than the line item (this is when I navigate to line item from the ke33). The difference is at product hierarchy level. Now I have document level details only at line item level. But, I only have total from ke33. I tried accessing CE3XXXX table. But, couldn't find a reason for the difference. I verified the currency also.
Please help me in finding the difference.

The Gross rev/gross billing column is keyfigure value field where a forula is defined in keyfigure scheme. The formula is not working.

How to summarize Open sales order credit value

Hi, friends.
I am designing Add-on report about credit exposure.
I found the relevant tables of Credit Limit in FD32
KNKK
S066
S067
Then, I would like to show the document details of open sales order credit value in the report.
I tried to summarize the open sales order amount from VBAK, VAUK, VBAP, VBUP.
However, it doest match to the amount in S066 table.
Can anyone tell us how to summarize Open sales order credit value from SD documents?
Regards,
Yu

Sudheer,
You need to check the update rule given in the definition of the Credit control Area which you are using for credit management. If you want only the open deliveries then you need to have update rule 15 in the credit control area.
In the credit controal settings, you need to have settings for the credit check at the delivery level.
Hope this will solve your issue.
Regards,
Chetan
Edited by: Chetan Gupte on Jul 15, 2010 8:56 PM

How to create a report and summarize some columns per page

Hi all,
I need to create a HTML report using the OA Framework Extension and it needs summarize some values columns highlighted similar to what can be done when using Report6i. Is there some class or package or a region or page's parameter that permits me to do that?
I also thought to summarize the values and put them in a table with a column saying that the line is a simple value or a summary and just put those values in html table. My problem still how to hightlight the html table line when the value "summary" is being fetched.
Any suggestion????
Thanks in Advance!!!

Essentially you want to write a pl/sql function which returns a varchar2 string. The contents of the string must be a valid sql statement.
Once you have done this, you need to add a report region as type sql report and you will have the option of writing it as a query or as a function returning query. Choose function returning query and enter in the function call.
Note your function must be valid, and must be executable by your apex parsing schema.
example:
create or replace
function test_report( p1_tablename in varchar2)
return varchar2
is
v_query varchar2(4000);
begin
v_query :=
'SELECT * from '||p_tablename;
return v_query;
end test_report;Edited by: Keith Jamieson on Aug 15, 2011 4:50 PM

Photos Year Overview does not always summarize geographic locations

Hello,
This has been bugging me for a while now. I have searched for similar questions in this forum but haven't found a thread that treats the same issue, so here we go.
In the year overview, in the standard IOS Photos app (completely zoomed out), not all the years are giving me a nice summarization of the geographic locations of my photos. As you can see in the screenshot attached, the first couple of years are showing just fine, but 2012, 2013 and 2014 aren't. No summarization of locations is showing and therefore I cannot view that particular year on the map.
Now, when I zoom in, almost all photos actually do have a geotag, some don't, but that isn't any different than in the years where locations are showing fine in the overview. I think in all the years about 98% of the photos do have a geotag, as I took all my photos with my iPhone. Oh, and the problem is similar on all my iOS devices.
I have no clue on what is going wrong. I already regretted that Apple removed the complete geographical overview map for all photos, but now individual years aren't even working.
I hope someone can help me. Thanks!

Hi there Phrenol,
I would recommend taking a look at the troubleshooting steps for PhotoStream found in the article below.
Get help using My Photo Stream
-Griff W.

How to summarize the formula field for grand total

Hi All
Iam desinging a report in which iam facing a problem to summarize the formula field . This formula field contains sum calculation like
formula name is @sales
Sum ({@DTM200}, {@SaleMan})+Sum ({@DTM500}, {@SaleMan})+
Sum ({@TM500}, {@SaleMan})+Sum ({@TM1000}, {@SaleMan})+
Sum ({@HTM500}, {@SaleMan})+Sum ({@HTM1000}, {@SaleMan})+
Sum ({@WM500}, {@SaleMan})+Sum ({@WM1000}, {@SaleMan})+
Sum ({@CURD}, {@SaleMan})+Sum ({@Buttermilk}, {@SaleMan})+
Sum ({@BULKWM}, {@SaleMan})+Sum ({@BULKTM}, {@SaleMan})
the fields are summary fields and iam calculating all these fields to get the final result . Upto this it is working fine but finally i want to calculate the grand total of this formula '@sales' how should do this
Thanks in advance

Hi,
If your formula name is @Sales you click the @Sales formula then Click Insert from Menu bar and click Summary.
Then click Grand Total.
Regards,
Clint

Running Total - How to summarize a formula field?

I'm sorry if this comes over as stupid but I have got myself quite messed up and am not 100% au fait with Crystal Reporting.
The aim of my report is to calculate the costs of selected tests and to calculate a grand total of all tests at the end.
I have created a group of jobtests.TestTypeName
Details
1. testTypeName - to show Test Name that is being calcutaed - Database field
2. Count ({jobTests.testTypeName}, {jobTests.testTypeName}) - to show number of tests of that type - this is a formula field
3. Analysis1 - to show the cost of that test type - Database field
4. {@CountTests/TestType} * {jobTests.AnalysisN1} - to show the number of tests per test type mulitplied by the cost of that test type - this is a formula field
Report footer
Count ({jobTests.testTypeName}) - to count the total number of tests
MY PROBLEM - I need to see the sum of 4, this would be my grand total
Trying to run the Running Total I can't get it to Summarize the field 4 because it is a formula field.
What can I do?
Thanks.

You can't do a SUM on a formula that uses another aggregate function. However, for both 4 and your grand total, you just need to SUM() (with ",{jobTests.testTypeName}" for the #4 calc), as the database field will be the cost for each test in each record.
HTH,
Carl

KE30 is not picking the data from summarization level

Hi Techies,
We are facing one issue in KE30 tcode.
We are able to run the same report in our QLTY, its showing "Data is getting fetched the data from summarization level 33" and we can see the output within 5 mins, But if we use same parameters in PRO, its showing "Data is getting fetched from segment level".
So we are not getting data in PRO, its throwing TIME_OUT error....
Request you to suggest how we can map these summarization level to the particular report.
*We have already rebuilt and refreshed the summarization levels, then also it is being picked from segment level.
Thanks in advance,
NIck Loy

Hi,
In KE30 right click on the report. Click on change. Go to the options tab. In the performnace block check if radio button "use a summarization level" is selected.
If the customizing is correct then the select stamenet generated by the report may not be in sync with the summ level i.e. the chars in the selection of the report must be there in the summ level.
regards
Waman

Summarize data from a subreport in a main report

Good afternoon,
I'm trying to summarize data from a subreport with data in a main report and I can't get it to summarize all the data correctly. The reports are linked on order number.
The main report has 3 groups - customer id, batch, order number (in that order). In the detail section I have product and amount. I have the group footer for group order numbers split into two. Footer A has the subreport.
The subreport has tax code and amount in the detail and I've created a shared variable:
WhilePrintingRecords;
Shared CurrencyVar taxtotal := Sum ({@total tax})
In my main report I created a formula for the shared variable:
WhilePrintingRecords;
Shared CurrencyVar taxtotal; taxtotal
In Footer B of the order number group I have a summary field that is taking the shared variable and adding it to the product amount and creating a total.
{@taxtotal1} +Sum ({@ext price}, )
That is all working fine. Where my problem comes in is on the footer for the Batch group. There are 3 order numbers for 1 batch. I have this summary field in the Batch group footer
({@taxtotal1} +Sum ({@ext price}, ))
But it's not calculating correctly. I need it to take all the product amounts and all the tax amounts and add them together, what it is doing is only adding one of the tax amounts along w/ all the product amounts.
What am I doing wrong? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Jeannette

Hi Jeanette,
You need to have the running total accumulate into the Batch group as well. Right now it's just getting the the Tax Total from the last Order Number.
In the formula in Footer B of the Order Number, change your formula to:
WhilePrintingRecords;
Shared CurrencyVar taxtotal;
CurrencyVar batchTaxTotal;
batchTaxTotal := batchTaxTotal + taxtotal;
taxtotal;
Now in your formula in the Batch footer change it to:
WhilePrintingRecords;
CurrencyVar batchTaxTotal;
(batchTaxTotal +Sum ({@ext price}, {batch}))
In the Batch Group Header, you will need to reinitialize the total to 0 for the next batch:
WhilePrintingRecords;
CurrencyVar batchTaxTotal := 0;
Good luck,
Brian

Printing problem with Summarize Comments?

Printing problem with Summarize Comments in Pro 10.1.6? When I print, I only get the number boxes on one page and the comments on the next page. The numbered boxes don't show up on the actual image itself.

Um I dont know if im doing something daft but I tried this like you said
PrinterJob printJob = PrinterJob.getPrinterJob();
printJob.setPrintable(this);
if(printJob.printDialog()){
try {
          PageFormat pageFormat = printJob.defaultPage();
          if (pageFormat.getOrientation() == PageFormat.PORTRAIT) {
          landscape = 0;} else {
               landscape = 1;}
          System.out.println("THE ORIENTATION IS "+ landscape);
          printJob.print(); }
catch (Exception PrinterExeption) { PrinterExeption.printStackTrace();}
and it doesnt seem to work as I tried it both as landscape and portrait in the print dialog but landscape is always 0.
cheers
pmiggy

'*' in Summarization Levels for CO-PA

Hi All,
What is the role of table "TKETRLF" in Account based CO-PA. When I try to check the CO-PA Datasource it is giving me an error. I tried to debug it and see where exactly is the problem. I found that the standard program is trying to read the data from the above said table and becoz of not finding the required data it is not picking up the summarisation level and throwing the error.
The table has got all the fields from the summarization levels and a flag(0,1,2...) which says if it is a summarization characteristic/user defined characteristic etc. The fields with out a '*' in KEDV has '0' as the flag. If the program finds the flag as '0' for any of the field in one summarization level then it is ignoring that level.
Since I have atleast one field with out a '*' in each of my summarization levels, it is not picking up the summarization level and throwing an error saying "No Source could be found".
This is very urgent...Please someone help me...
Thanks,
RPk.

Hi,
I have the same problem, and I find SAP Note Note 1069507 - BI Extraction : 'Errors occurred during the extraction'. This is for version 5.0, probably it help you, but in my case I am working in ECC 6.0.
Regards,
Gabriel Barroso.-

Summarization Levels in COPA. Tr Code KEDV

Dear All,
I request you to give me some Clarifications on Summarization Levels namely;
1) Are the summarization levels build form Line Items tables(CE1XXXX and CE2XXXX).
2) If so how does it get the field "PLIKZ"(Plan/Actual Indicator) for Plan line items as this field so not part of CE2XXXX, so How is it Updated?
3) Assuming that there are Performance problems even after using Summarization Levels, can you please explain as to how exactly do the Indexs work.?
4) In Indexes, there are 5 Columns with the title "Field", each of the column containing multiple rows, can you please explain what is the use of each of the columns.?
5) i have gone through the OSS Note "83204", in it there is a path(given below) given to download the information on Summarization Levels. However, i was not sure as to how to download it Could you please let me know how to download it.If Possible can you upload the document under "Wiki" or " Articles".
Below is the data and the file path from the note:
===============================================
The document can be downloaded via ftp from the sapserv3 server (binary
transfer mode). The German or English version is stored in directory:
(~ftp/)general/R3server/abap/note.0083204
under the name h83204dt.doc or n83204en.doc.

Hi,
Please follow instructions in note 480180 to download the file. Also for creating index you can refer to note 35288. Together with summarization levels and a proper secondary index you should not face major performace issue. If the performance continues to be bad then you must think about archiving the CE1 or CE4 tables in CO-PA.
Regards,
Abhisek

CO-PA Account Based - Summarization built but no records!

Our CO-PA AB extractor has not been functional for a while in test. Production is fine. To remedy, the R/3 folks have rebuilt the summarization levels. Ran for 3 days but finished OK. The status is now "Active". In the details screen the K8XXXXX tables - Key and Totals - have records. The Build panel has a record count but the Update panel has 0 records. RSA3 to check the extractor brings back nothing - times out. Running an infopackage - first replicating the datasource and reactivating TRs - still no records. Has anyone run into this before? Is there another step? Or another setting after the summarization runs that we have missed? Do records need to built for the Update panel - is that done through KEDU? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks. Don

Ravi - Thanks. The R/3 system (F) that feeds the dev BW enviroment is not modifiable so I would have to get it opened for this but it brings up an issue. Our company has R/3 D and Q systems but we are not connected to them for data. Extractor enhancement is done in D then moved quickly thru Q and then to F for testing. (Yes, the R/3 transport person is always complaining). There are some minor enhancements to this extractor that are waiting to move to F for testing - once we get data. I assume re-generating the datasource will have no impact on the transport moving through with those enhancements. Please let me know if that needs clarification. Thanks again.

CO-PA Summarization Level

Hi,
I am very unclear about summarization levels in CO-PA. Please can any one explain me what is the real significance of summarization level, why do we need it and steps to configure it, and on what logic is data extracted from it.
Thank you,
Sam

1. What is use of summarizattion in COPA?
summarization level in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA):
A summarization level is a tool for improving performance.
Summarization levels store an original dataset in summarized form. This gives quick access to presummarized data for functions that do not need detailed information, and means that the data does not need to be summarized separately each time.
you can check this in this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ae/bd116e940f11d2b63c0000e82debc6/frameset.htm
2. If we dont give summarization in COPA Account based will records be available in RSA3 - yes
2. How to create summarization level for a datasource?
You can do this in Transaction - KCDU/KCDV or SPRO
Hope it helps.
Regards

CO-PA Summarization Levels

Hi,
for a report with many characteristics I created 4 summarization levels in such a way that
Summarization Level 2 includes all characteristics of the Summarization Level 1 + some more
Summarization Level 3 includes all characteristics of the Summarization Level 2 + some more
Summarization Level 4 includes all characteristics of the Summarization Level 3 + some more
In the report options, in Presummarized data section, I selected "Read upon each navigation step".
Now when I execute the report, data is first read from the Summarization Level 1. During drill down data is read from further summarization levels depending on which characteristic is used for the drill down.
There is one thing that I don't understand:
None of these summarization levels is used by the system if it does not contain the characteristic "Product".
As Product is not used for the initial selection of the report I initially put it on Summarization Level 3. But the system did not want to use Summarization Levels 1 and 2 then. When I added the Product to the Levels 1 and 2, everything is working fine. However this is not what I need because Product is not displayed on the first screen of the report.
Do you know why the characteristic "Product" is required in each summarization level?
I will appreciate your help very much!
With best regards,
Marcin

Hi Surya,
My report is calling all summarization levels.
At the start the summariyation level 1 is called. It is most aggregated so it is little time needed to start the report. It contains only the most frequently used characteristics.
During drilldown other summarization levels can be called (this is achieved thru the option "Read upon each navigation step"). It depends on which characteristic is used for drilldown: if the characteristic used for drilldown is not included in the currently used summarization level, the next least aggregated summarization level which includes this characteristic is called.
The most frequently used characteristics are included in the most aggregated summarization level, the least frequently used characteristics are included in the least aggregated summarization level, which contains all characteristics used in the report.
With best regards,
Marcin

FI Summarization SD

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for