FIELDS IN TRANSFORMATION (UPDATE RULES)

Hi all,
When i add fields to a standard cube from the infosource. I understand that i also have to add those fields in the transformation.
In the transformation display i do see the added fields in the datasource (infosource). But i do not see any infoobject in the rule group to match it with.
How do I add an info object in the rule group (transformation) to match it with the datasource?
Thanks

Hi,
It is not neccessary to use infosource any more. Please follo the below steps:
1. create rule for target infoobject.
2. choose rule type read from master data
3. add  source field
4. assign source infoobject to target as IOAssgnmt
5. set Source InfoObject
6. save and activate
Hope so this will be helpfull for you.
Cheers
Rajesh

Similar Messages

  • Error when transporting a transformation (Update rule) BI 7.0

    Error when transporting a transformation (Update rule) BI 7.0
    Hi all,
    I’m trying to transport the transformation between the infocube 0FIGL_C10 and the ODS 0FIGL_010 from BI Dev into BI QAS. I kept getting a return code 12.
    Transport message:
       Program terminated (job: RDDEXECL, no.: 18141700)
       See job log
       Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
       End date and time: 20070620181432
    I go to the log and I got the following message:
    Job started
    Step 001 started (program RDDEXECL, variant, user ID DDIC)
    All DB buffers of application server vrxsapq1 were synchronized
    ABAP/4 processor: ASSERTION_FAILED
    Job cancelled
    I’m using BI 7.0
    I don’t know what it is. Can someone tell what should I do or what I’m missing?
    Thanks a lot
    Regards
    Vic

    Hi Victor,
    check this thread may it solves your problem
    Re: Error during the creation of transport request
    one more thread
    /message/2785863#2785863 [original link is broken]
    cheers
    Sunil
    Message was edited by:
            Sunil John

  • Fields missing in Update rules

    I am creating snap shot DSO for inventory management and after that i created the update rules for it linking it to the info source 2LIS_03_BX. When i do this i am missing the info objects that i created to include in the DSO. How do i solve this issue as those info objects are very important and i have to create the routines for it.
    I have got the units for those fields and they are mapped but the info objects itself are missing.
    Thanks for any help in advance
    Naveen

    HI Naveen,
    Yes, you can include the missing infoobject in DSO. for that you need to follow bellow steps:
    a). Delete the data from DSO.
    b). you have to include the infoobject in DSO.
          Double click on  DSO>select chage mode->select keyfield /data field node--->right click select Infoobject Direct Input.
    c). Activate the DSO
    Brief Description about 2LIS_03_BX :
    The 2LIS_03_BX is used to extract an opening stock balance on a detailed level (material, plant, storage location and so on). At this moment, the opening stock is the operative stock in the source system. "At this moment" is the point in time at which the statistical setup ran for infosource 2LIS_03_BX.Loading the opening stock balance InfoSource 2LIS_03_BX into data target.In the InfoPackage, choose the upload mode u201CCreate opening balanceu201D.
    Regards,
    Suman.

  • Update rule field.

    hiye,
    i'm trying to assign a field to my update rule but i keep getting this error.
    Field "COMM_STRUCTURE-ZCOSTCODE" is unknown
    any idea?

    Hey,
       I got the issue. It is due to different data types.
    Do type casting before passing it to the target field.
    Example :
    source_var TYPE CHAR
    target_var   TYPE  NUMC
    Create a temp variable.
    temp_var   TYPE NUMC.
    Assign the value as follows.
    temp_var  = source_var.
    target_var = temp_var.
    This will solve the problem.
    Regards,
    Balaji V

  • ABAP needed: New Value/Old Value in Update Rules

    Hi all
    I'm updating some attributes in IObj by ABAP routine. Is it possible to get not only new value of attribute but the old one to compare them?
    Is it possible to get others attribute old and new values?
    I'll illustrate it with example.
    Say, IObj has 3 attributes:
    0ACC_GRP
    0DT_FROM
    0DT_TO
    if NEW value of 0ACC_GRP <> OLD value of 0ACC_GRP then
    new 0DT_FROM = SYSDAT
    new 0DT_TO = old 0DT_FROM
    else
    new 0DT_FROM = old 0DT_FROM
    new 0DT_TO = old 0DT_TO

    My case quite simple I guess.
    I got 0CUSTOMER infoobject and appended it with several time-dep attributes. After it my Update rules were deactvated.  I got error message with prompt to fill out FROM_DATE, TO_DATE as key fields in every attribute (time-dependable and none time-dependable) while was trying re-activate Update Rules.
    So, what's wrong with that? What I supposed to do with all those to/from date key fields  in my Update Rules??
    Edited by: Gediminas Berzanskis on Jul 2, 2008 3:44 PM

  • BI7.0 _Issue with Migration of Update rules

    Hi friends,
    I am trying to migrate Sales DataFlow. As per the steps, when i am trying to transform Update rules and Transfer Rules , system is prompting " Before Rules Can Be Copied, You Must Select an InfoSource" . But i heard IS is optional in BI7.0. So what shall i do here?? how to proceed to transform these UR and TR without using Infosource.
    Can any body have some doc with steps to migrate any dataflow to BI7.0 , please send me to my id [email protected]
    Please suggest some thing.
    thanks with advance
    -Murthy

    Murthy,
    Did you converted your 3.x Data source to 7.0 Data source or not. If you have already converted you dont need to select any infosource. Goto the Tcode RSDS and migrate 3.x datasource to 7.0 and try to create the transformation rule.
    here is link where you can find more info
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/e3/e60138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    Jagadeesh.

  • 0PM_DS02 - Problem with Update Rule

    Hi ,
    I have installed the Standard ODS 0PM_DS02 from BI content.
    Problem is --> In Update Rule all Data Fields have been installed perfectly but all Key Fields with Blank ( No Assignment ) .
    I would like to know  what is the reason that All the KEY Fields have installed with Blank .
    Though I can do the manual assignment for characteristics like Equipment / Functional location but my specific area of Concern is what to assign to time characteristcs 0CALDAY / 0CALMONTH etc.
    I would appreciate your help in guiding me what to assign in Key fields of 0PM_DS02 update rule.
    regards
    Vishal

    Probably you have got it resolved already.  The key fields are assigned along with the data fields in the statement RESULT_TABLE[] = G_T_UPDATE_IMAGE. 
    G_T_UPDATE_IMAGE has the same structure as /BI0/APM_DS0200, which is nothing but the active data table of 0PM_DS02.  This structure gets populated in the FM BW_MCI1_KEYFIGURE_ARRAY_GET.

  • Update rule changes

    hi
    is there a way to compare previous & currently active Update rules ...somebody has changed the update rules and i have no clue what changes have been made ..
    i need to check changes to 0recordmode
    thanks

    Hi Koops
    Check the Update routine as well as field wise routine
    Click on any field in the update rules it will take to you to the another screen there u will click on the field  wise code u will know.Normally for our seek when ever changes are made @ that time we will put a comment along with the date.
    Hope it will clear.If not let me know for further.
    Regards
    RMK
    **No need to say assisgning pointz is the only way of saying thanx IN SDN**

  • Transformation can't see a field, Update rules can! Why?

    Hi!
    I've a problem creating a transformation between 2 ODS:
    When I create a transformation system correctly proposes me the schema except for a field: I can't see in source table (but I see it in destination) a Key figure that exists in source ODS and works correctly in update Rules!
    I try to explain better: a key fig whose unique difference against other fields is the No AGGREGATION attribute appears in destination fields (ODS B) of transformation but not in source fields (ODS A). The strange is that that keyfig is in data fields of source ODS (ODS A). When i try to create a transformation using that Datastore (ODS A) as destinations I have the same problem: field appears in destination(ODS A) but not in source (ODS C), even if I try to create a transformation looping on same ODS!(ODS A on ODS A) it doesn't appear in source fields.
    Any suggestion, SAP Note to read about it???
    Thank you!

    In the key figure  change screen> in the additional propertis tab>uncheck the attribute only option so that it will solve ur problem. u did this operation already...good.
    Thanks,Rams.

  • DATA Transformation Vs Update Rules ?

    Hi guys,
          I have a scenerio , where I need to have data from 2 DSOs in to one combined DSO. Lets Says the 2 DSOs as DSO A and DSO B. and the Third as DSO C.
        I want to get DSO C Structure as exactly as DSO A. and DSO B structure is only few fiew fields from DSO A (Key Fields are same). I have loaded the data in to DSO A and DSO B using Transformation and DTP . Now How to load DSO C data I mean combined data of DSO A and B.
    1.If I create update Rules to DSO C using DSO A and DSO B. Iam not getting any data in to DSO C. (Do I need to make any settings in DSOs to update the data of A and B in to C ?).
    2.If I create 2 transformations between DSO A -C  and DSO B-C. I am sure I need to create DTPs to get the corresponding data. When I do that Iam getting 2 separate sets of data for DSO C. But I need data as one set from DSO A & B in to C.
    Please help me ASAP and let me know if you need more information on it.
    Thanks in advance

    Hello Harish,
    I just got confusedwith the requirement. When u r loading from 2 sources (here it is DSO A and DSO B), then obviously u will get 2 rows whne u manage your DSO C.
    But, in case u r referring to data, then there should be some commonality between A, B and C, thenonly it will not come as seperate rows in your report.
    Can u send the details of DSO A, B and C ?
    -- Plz assign points if helpful --
    Regards,
    Mainak

  • Need to create a transformation based on Update Rules Logic

    Hi,
    I have an existing complex Update Rule. I need to manually create a Transformation based on this Update Rule logic. The Start Routine of the Update Rule comprises of:
    1) All data declarations in the Global Area
    2) The local coding area consists of various select statements from various r/3 tables used later for mapping. It also calculates and stores values in the Data Package final internal table for few infoobjects that are not present in the Source object but and are used to populated data in the target.
    3) then we have the various one to one individual Infoobject mappings/constants and many individual infoobject routines that pick result from the comm_structure
    I am not very clear as to where each of the above coding logic should be put in the transformation coding area...... I can see four main coding areas in the transformation....global area, 2nd Global Area, Method Start_Routine and Method Inverse_Start_Routine........... I think the global data declarations(point 1 above) should be put in the Global declaration area of the start routine. The local area of the update rule logic (point 2 above) that contains select statements should be put in 2nd Global part or should it be put in Method Start_routine????? Point 3 above for individual filed mappings will be done through Rule groups. Also can anyone let me know what is the methos inverse_start_routine used for?????
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Point 1 you mentioned should be put under2nd Global declaration part of start routine.
    Point 2 should be put under Method Start_routine.
    Point 3 as you only mentioned can be done by individual field rule mappings.
    Method inverse_start_routine
          This subroutine needs to be implemented only for direct access
          (for better performance) and for the Report/Report Interface
          (drill through)
    Not very clear though about Inverse routine. But definetly not being used for the case you mentioned.
    Hope it helps.

  • Convert ABAP code in start routine/update rule to transform. start routine

    Dear BW ABAPers,
    I have created a custom purchasing info cube (YCP_PURC1) based on 0CP_PURC1 standard cube. I would like to convert this new data flow to BI7 (from 3.x), and convert the standard update rule to transformation. I would need to rewrite the below start routine from the standard update rule to a start routine ABAP code in the newly created  transformation / start routine. My ABAP knowledge is limited. Will you please help?
    *this is the start routine from the update rule. As a side note, the data source is 2LIS_02_SCL.
    LOOP AT SOURCE_PACKAGE.
        IF (     SOURCE_PACKAGE-cppvlc  EQ 0
             AND SOURCE_PACKAGE-cppvoc  EQ 0
             AND SOURCE_PACKAGE-cpquaou EQ 0 ).
          DELETE SOURCE_PACKAGE.
          CONTINUE.
        ENDIF.
    no_scl is initial ( e.g. for good receipts, billing)
    value has to be set depending on storno
        IF SOURCE_PACKAGE-no_scl IS INITIAL.
          IF SOURCE_PACKAGE-storno = 'X'.
            SOURCE_PACKAGE-no_scl = -1.
          ELSE.
            SOURCE_PACKAGE-no_scl = 1.
          ENDIF.
          MODIFY SOURCE_PACKAGE.
        ENDIF.
      ENDLOOP.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0.
    Many thanks and look forward to your kind feedback.
    Kind regards,
    Csaba

    Dear All, Durgesh,
    thanks to you all for your valuable input. Mainly the ABAP part was more interesting for me.
    Durgesh, thanks for your input, it was useful. I just had to change the info objects to data source fields and add the lines before the loop:
    DATA: I_PACKAGE TYPE TYT_SC_1.
        FIELD-SYMBOLS <i_package> TYPE tys_sc_1.
        I_PACKAGE[] = SOURCE_PACKAGE[].
        LOOP AT SOURCE_PACKAGE assigning <i_package>.
          IF ( <i_package>-BWGEO EQ 0
          AND <i_package>-BWGEOO EQ 0
          AND <i_package>-BWMNG EQ 0 ).
            DELETE SOURCE_PACKAGE index sy-tabix.
            CONTINUE.
          ENDIF.
    no_scl is initial ( e.g. for good receipts, billing)
    value has to be set depending on storno
          IF <i_package>-NOSCL IS INITIAL.
            IF <i_package>-ROCANCEL = 'X'.
              <i_package>-NOSCL = -1.
            ELSE.
              <i_package>-NOSCL = 1.
            ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
        ENDLOOP.
    Points have been assigned accordingly.
    Thanks,
    Csaba

  • Error in Update Rule migration using "Create Transformation"

    Hi gurus,
    We are encountering errors in the migration of our 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_BX update rules into a transformation via URs Context Menu    Additional functions - > Create transformation
    This action creates a new transformation, but is only generating very little Routine assignements in our KF fields. That is, some KF have their old ABAP converted automatically into ABAP OO while the rest (majority) of KF fields have no rule (routine) assigned at all.
    However, the most surprising thing is that after executing the "Create Transformation", the log shows everything correct and warnings (message 652 "Routine created. Verify sintax").
    Have you ever faced this problem?
    Is the automatic migration tool working correctly?
    If not, do we need to manually create all those KF routines that have not been correctly been migrated? Even after two years since new dataflow that was released?
    We are on SP 15...
    Thanks and best regards,
    Enric

    Hi Juanjo,
    In fact, if I understand you correctly, I'm facing the same situation: all FORMS based on OLD individual KFs routine are now available in the global transformation routine in ABAP OO, but what I'm missing is the individual source to target KF field mapping to routine, where the method with the perform to each coding should be done.
    Shall I understand this is a common bug? Manual correction proposed?
    Thanks,
    Enric

  • Migration of update rules to transformations

    Hi Experts,
    We are in process of migrating update rules to Transformations.
    We have following data flow for one info cube.
    *Existing*
    Data source -
    >transfer Rules--->info source->update rules--
    >cube
    New
    Data source -
    >transformations----
    >cube
    When I am trying to create transformations, I am not able to read master data properties for all info objects.
    It gives error that No info object is available.
    Now my question is
    it is not possible to read mster data in one transformation?
    If I change my new scenario to this then it workes.
    Data source -
    >transformations----->info source(new BI7)--
    >transformations -
    >cube
    But then I need to convert All existing info source to new one in BI7 then only I can use read from master data functionality.
    Please advice.
    <removed by moderator>
    Edited by: Siegfried Szameitat on Nov 25, 2008 9:05 AM

    In the Transformation maintenance, open the rule details.
    Here you see the source fields of the rule.
    Update 'IOAssgnmnt' with the InfoObject corresponding to the field from the source system.
    Example
    Field PERNR
    Description Personnel No.
    Type NUMC
    Length 8               
    Conversion
    IOAssgnmnt 0EMPLOYEE  <-- Entered manually
    Then you should be able to use the 'Read master data' functionality.
    Regards,
    Lars

  • Key rule 2 (target field: M1_SUN): Initial update set

    HI
    friends,
    while creating transformations for my character i gave initial
    i am getting this message
    Key rule 2 (target field: M1_SUN): Initial update set
    initial means blank, so my output values should be blank for material, ple let me know.
    regards
    suneel.

    Hi Suneel,
    Normally you would want to load data for an InfoObject, so if you are not, the system just warns you. Like you also get warning when adding or removing nav attr from an InfoObject. Even if you are doing that for a reason, the system will prompt with warnings before activating the object.
    Hope this helps...

Maybe you are looking for