Fiinding MEMORY,CPU usage trend since the server was installed

Hi - I want to find out the maximum usage trend of CPU , memory,swap and directory space in SAP HANA which can be utilized for assesement of capacity planning. Please let me know the various ways to achieve this.
Regards,
Sharad

Hi Sharad,
Please go though the below guide link which will help you get all the information related to SAP HANA Administration,troubleshooting and performance.
http://help.sap.com/hana/SAP_HANA_Administration_Guide_en.pdf
http://help.sap.com/hana/SAP_HANA_Troubleshooting_and_Performance_Analysis_Guide_en.pdf
Please let me know if is there any concerns.
Thank you.
Warm Regards,
Earesh kuamr

Similar Messages

Are there any memory and cpu logging extensions that is addon, not process oriented, that will detect ram/cpu usage, even within the main Firefox process?

And why wasn't this a feature in FF already? I hear it was, but it was dropped in FF4 as part of some kind of feature freeze? Why was this most important of all features removed, and how can I patch this? So I can use my browser properly again. Maybe an addon that would make about-addonsmemory detect that kind of stuff would do, maybe something that forces all addons to operate within the plugin container. Or maybe just something that will moniter everything right.

The CPU usage part is the most important

Memory & CPU Usages

Hi,
I'm a new user of SJSAS. Currently I�ve installed v9.1 on redhat. I would be helpful for if any body answers questions below-
1. Is it possible to set different limit for memory & CPU usages for different applications, if yes then how ?
2. How can I monitor memory & CPU usages by different application ?
Thanks

By "application", I'm assuming you mean different web/ejb/enterprise applications within a single SJSAS instance. If that's true, then the answer to your question is no -- all applications share the resources of the appserver.
On the other hand, if you need to, you can set up multiple instances of the appserver on the same machine, deploy one application to each instance, and control the resources that the appserver itself uses. How you limit the CPU use (and monitor) is then done at the OS level -- I don't know how it's done in Linux, actually. But in Solaris, you could use the Solaris Resource Monitor, or processor sets, or Zones/LDOMs, or any number of things to affect the resources available to the appserver; look for similar things in Linux.

10.1.3 memory/CPU usage problems

I recently migrated from JDev 9.0.5.2 to 10.1.3.0.4 and impressed with the new features and functionality.
However I've noticed the interface seems significantly slower (eg. code insight and simply inserting a new line of code is much slower), and the memory footprint seems to continually grow. Seeing it at >300M is not unusual.
There are also times when JDev seems to simply hang, and when I look a the JDev process in WinXP, the memory usage grows seemingly out of control as well as gobbling CPU cycles. My only option to kill the process. I'm using a 2.6G Pentium, 1G RAM, WinXP Prof and JDK 1.5.0_05.
Are there known problems with JDev's memory/CPU usage, or known options I can turn off to improve performance?
TIA

I don't have the memory monitor extension and have turned off all non-essential extensions but still see the memory-growth problem.
One odd thing I noticed is the JDev process on WinXP grows by 2-3MB each time a breakpoint is hit. I verified that same behavior doesn't exist in JDev 9.0.5.2 for the same project, and happens no matter which J2SE I select for the 10.1.3 project (JDK 1.4 or 1.5) or which runtime VM (hotspot or ojvm).

Methods to reduce the CPU Usage for painting the image

Hi,
I have developed an application to view images from an IP camera. By this I can simualtaneously view images from about 25 cameras. The problem is that the CPU Usage increases as the no of player increases. My Player is JPanel. which continuously paints the images from camera. The method 'paintImage' is called from another thread's run method. This thread is responsible for taking jpeg images from IP camera.
Here is the code for this.
public void paintImage(Image image, int fps) {
try {
int width = this.getWidth();
addToBuffer(image);
currentImage = image;
Graphics graphics = this.getGraphics();
if (isRunning && graphics != null) {
   graphics.drawImage(image, 0, 0, getWidth(), getHeight(), this);
   if(border ==true){
    graphics.setColor(Color.RED);
                      graphics.drawRect(0,0,getWidth()-1, getHeight()-1);
   graphics.setColor(Color.white);
   graphics.setFont(new Font("verdana", Font.ITALIC, 12));
   graphics.drawString("FPS : " + fps, width-60, 13);
   this.fps = fps;
   if (isRandomRecord) {
    graphics.setColor(new Color(0, 255, 0));
    graphics.fillArc((getWidth() - 10), 5, 10, 10, 0, 360);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
Can someone please help me to solve this problem so that the CPU usage can be reduced.

Can you give me more detail information about how to use
an automated profiling tool You run it and excercise your app. Then it presents stats on number of times each method was called and time spent in each method, plus other stuff. Using those two stats you can zero in on the areas that are most likely to yield resullts.

Ever since iOS 7 was installed on my phone it keeps fetching all and any e-mail from my server and it is taking up tp as much as 2.5 GB even after I delete the messages! Now after a complete wipe and restore it is happening all over

ever since iOS 7 was installed on my phone it keeps fetching all and any e-mail from my server and it is taking up tp as much as 2.5 GB even after I delete the messages! Now after a complete wipe and restore it is happening all over again why can't the techs at apple fix this defective program??????????????

ever since iOS 7 was installed on my phone it keeps fetching all and any e-mail from my server and it is taking up tp as much as 2.5 GB even after I delete the messages! Now after a complete wipe and restore it is happening all over again why can't the techs at apple fix this defective program??????????????

The server was unable to load the SSL provider library needed to log in

Hello All,
When I am trying to login to my default SQL 2008R2 SP2 instance in windows 2003 server via ssms, I am getting the below error
A connection was successfully established with the server, but then an error occurred during the pre-login handshake. (provider: Shared Memory Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.) (.Net SqlClient Data Provider)
When I looked into the error log and i could see lot of these messages.
The server was unable to load the SSL provider library needed to log in; the connection has been closed. SSL is used to encrypt either the login sequence or all communications, depending on how the administrator has configured the server. See Books
Online for information on this error message: 14 Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.
Force protocol encryption is set to off.
I am not sure what is the underlying problem. server's total RAM is 4 Gb and max_server_memory is set to 2 GB. CPU utilization is very normal at the time of issue.
I restarted the SQL service and i am able to connect to the instance, but the issue is repeating and i need to find a permanent fix.
Thanks

I could also see the below in error log some time before i get the above alert
Error: 701, Severity: 17, State: 123.
There is insufficient system memory in resource pool 'internal' to run this query
then after sometime flurry of alerts
The server was unable to load the SSL provider library
needed to log in; the connection has been closed. SSL is used to encrypt either the login sequence or all communications, depending on how the administrator has configured the server. See Books Online for information on this error message: 14 Not enough storage
is available to complete this operation.
Thanks

The server was unable to save the form at this time. Please try again

Having created a new custom list (even with only a text field) I am unable add new items to the list - the error message is Unexpected
response from server. The status code of response is '0'. The status text of response is ''. when in 'quick edit'.
If I try to add or modify an item in the list by clicking 'add new item' I get "The
server was unable to save the form at this time. Please try again."
I have restarted the Sharepoint Search Host Controller server but to no avail. I have 24Gb RAM for this server so it's not a
memory issue (8Gb available). I have also tried from various browsers including Chrome and Safari - still the same error message.
This error only occurs on lists. I can edit document properties in a library and have no problems with calendar entries.
There are no entries in the event viewer, so where do I need to begin looking to find out what is (or rather is not) happening?

One thing I noticed in SP 2013 is that if your list has unique permissions and a user/group has permissions only on that list and has limited or no access at the site level, then you run into this error: "The server was unable to save the form at this time.
Please try again."
This can be resolved by either giving that user/group atleast read access at the site level or in my case I had to create a new permission set (since we cant update limited access permission set) which is same as limited access but with the additional permission
of "Use Remote Interfaces - Use SOAP, Web DAV, the Client Object Model or SharePoint Designer interfaces to access the Web site."
I am not sure if this is a bug or as per design, but not allowing a user who has needed permissions at the list level but limited access at site level doesnt seem right. Never ran into this issue in prior version of SharePoint. I tested and this additional
permission doesnt seem to violate any security at site level. But implement this at your risk. No guarantees provided and not responsible for any issues with this implementation if any.

I downloaded Firefox but can't open it. I keep getting "The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading" message. If it's a firewall issue, how do I change my firewall to accept Firefox?

I have used Firefox for a number of years but some time ago I got a virus on my computer. I loaded eset nod32, removed the virus and cleaned the old files etc. using ccleaner.com. Now I keep getting the "The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading" message and I haven't been able to use firefox since then. I have uninstalled and re-installed it several times with no avail. I suspect there is something in my windows frrewall stopping it.

If you want to check the Firewall, follow this-
1. Click Start Menu > Control Panel > Security Center.
2. Under the "Manage security settings for" click Windows Firewall.
3. On the Exceptions tab, do one of the following-
1. If Mozilla Firefox Firefox is there in the list, make sure it's checked.
2. If Mozilla Firefox is not there, close the Windows Firewall window.

The connection to the server was reset while the p...

For the past week i keep getting the below error page every minute or so--->
"The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few
    moments.
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network
    connection.
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure
    that Firefox is permitted to access the Web."
When i refresh the page it usually goes through as normal or does it again and needs to refresh again. Seems like every 1-2 mins i get a period of 15-20 secs of this.
Is this the connection droppping or another error altogether?? If its not actually the connection dropping will this affect gaming online (xbox 360, Battlefield 3)?
I believe Infinity is rolling out in my village (ST8 7__) (Biddulph Moor) next month. Could this be the reason? Its not the sites/pages im visiting as its happening no matter what site i visit.
I have done the quiet line test (17070) and thats fine. My hub details and speedtest is below. As far as i know we connected to the master socket.
Any advice will be greatly appreciated
I cant do the btspeedtest as the bill payer is away so i cant find out the Serice ID. I have done a test on speedtest.net if thAt is any good
[URL=http://www.speedtest.net][IMG]http://www.speedtest.net/result/1862765754.png[/IMG][/URL]
ADSL line status Connection information
Line state
Connected
Connection time
2 days, 15:46:50
Downstream
2,643 Kbps
Upstream
1,031 Kbps
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
ITU-T G.992.5
Latency type
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)
10.1 dB / 5.3 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
55.5 dB / 35.1 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
0.0 dBm / 12.8 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local)
0
Loss of Signal (Local)
0
Loss of Power (Local)
0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
0 / 13
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
3101 / N/A
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
N/A / 11
Error Seconds (Local)
1281

I dont believe so no. And the speed isnt an issue for me. I live in a village in the sticks so never had over 2.5mb. The issue is the error i get all the time. Ive had problems in the past where my connection would drop and i would have to wait to connect again before continuing. That was along time ago. This seems a different error. And is instantly fixed a refresh.
So if my connection doesnt actually drop will this affect online gaming?
Could this error be due to infinity coming to my area next month?
The reasn its an issue for me at the moment is because im a memeber of a few survey sites where i get paid to take surveys. This error causes me so much trouble. I i click a survey and this error occurs then i lose that survey.... so its actually preventing me from making money :-(
I think we will be getting infinity at the end of april. But if this isnt anything to do with inifinty and is actually a problem with my line then im concerned this will continue.
Since i heard a week or so ago inifinity was rolling out in my village in april this problem seems to have started. So im guessing its due to infinty.
Could it be? and when infinity is running in my village could this problem cease?

Error while creating task: The server was unable to save the form at this time. Please try again. (SharePoint 2013)

I get the following error while saving a task inside task list:
"The server was unable to save the form at this time. Please try again."
I tried restarting "search service host controller".
The server has 8 GB RAM and according to task manager, 6.67 GB is being used.
I logged into the site with user which is the owner of the site. I tried creating tasks from client as well as the SharePoint server itself. Same error is shown in both the cases.
How do I find information on the exact problem that is causing the error? What are possible solutions?

Hi robikshrestha,
This error message often shows when there is low memory that can be used, the workaround restart the “SharePoint Search Hosting Controller” service is to release some memory, and make it work. Whether restart the service release memory
in your situation?
Would you please check whether this issue happens all the time in task list, or happens sometimes when the memory is lower to use. If it doesn’t have a large impact, you can restart the server, check the result. have a look at the event
log and ULS log, see whether there is related information.
If it happens all the time, would you please use other browsers, whether the results are same? This may be caused by some add-ons in IE, like Free Download Manager I have seen.
Thanks,
Qiao Wei
TechNet Community Support

How can I disable incesant rambling alarm "The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading" in FF17?

In using FF 17.0.1 in a WinXP/SP3 notebook (Acer) while traveling abroad I get unrelenting rambling and totally inconsequential display alarms "The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading." The page in question looks perfectly fine and there is NO problem whatsoever in its display. The only problem is this annoyingly useless alarm, which forces the screen display to the tab where the supposed error occurred when one is in a different tab -- in a couple of instances, this absolutely unnecessary, forced jump to a different tab has made me lose data being entered in a different tab.
The notebook is extremely lean in its booting process -- no shared DLLs preloaded; no crapware; limited essential start-ups; trimmed unused or irrelevant services. The alarm occurs:
(1) with FF and the OS in either normal or safe mode (i.e., both safe mode, both normal mode, or one safe mode and the other normal mode);
(2) using different Western European ISPs;
(3) using different DNS servers (either default European ones, or manually selected top-tier U.S. servers);
(4) and with a number of different web pages (such as many in sites of news organizations) but not in all pages (for instance, none of the different Google server pages).
The alarm does NOT occur browsing the same pages with either Chrome, Opera or IE.
I have not been able to find a clearly marked entry for such an alarm in about:config, and am weary of start changing alarms settings blindly. The text of this alarm is not found in firefox.exe so it must be in one of its associated libraries. Given that this alarm is COMPLETELY WORTHLESS, especially in its manic wanton conditions, can some one give me an informed opinion on how to disable it? TIA

Thanks for responding, David. Using <Esc> and <CtrlW> might reduce the time in returning to the other tab, but does little when the triggering of a wanton alarm is very frequent. The connections I have used were extremely reliable and fast. I am using at this moment a 54 Mbps WiFi connection that lives up to its ratings in downloading & uploading data; yet, as shown in the attached image, I still get this worthless alarm. I do not know if this problem happens with my regular ISP since I have been using this tiny notebook only when traveling -- will test that once I am back mostly for curiosity, but even then if then the alarm were not triggered this would be of little consolation, since other browsers do not have the problem right now).
As a moderator, I urge you to ask the Mozilla-powers-to-be why there is no way to turn off the alarm with, say, a true/false switch in about:config (mind you, there is still old-versions junk in this config list, so it isn't we are talking about amending the constitution). Complains about this fugly alarm can be traced in the web as far back as 2010 at least. Besides, what is the advantage of the alarm for the average user? When FF users are still posing amazingly basic questions in forums of Firefox or Mozilla support, such an alarm ought to be _off_ by default and should be an option of advanced settings menu. This annoyance shows how much the critical focus on keeping a simple GUI uncluttered by trivial or higher-level messages still needs to evolve for Firefox, which I have used it since it was known a Firebird. Guess will have to switch to Chrome now while abroad.
Happy Holidays

The server was unable to save the form at this time. Please try again - tried the trust standards...

2013 standard sharepoint server. Content DBs were on a Trial enterprise server and copied over to standard server. All was good on trial server.
there are 8 sites on server, 2 of the sites cannot create or edit items, they get "The server was unable to save the form at this time. Please try again"
googling around i tried everything. restarted search host controller, checked ram usage (8gb free), manage content types, iisresets, edit the web.config file ( add things for ram, search host, etc), no alternate access mappings, .net HTTP activation, rebooted
server... I'm sure i missed some.
The server is new install, all but the August HF CUs. Trial server the content DBs came from is at same level.
It is not a server level issue as the other 6 sites are fine. its something with just 2 sites.
kinda stuck here...
Thanks,
Scott<-

With the USL Logs were hard to track down what was happening, though I think it was too do with /_vti_bin/client.svc/ProcessQuery.
I did the Enable/Disable Anonymous Access on the Directory with no luck.
Brought up Fiddler and Saw that I was getting 401 and 500 Errors on
GET http://team.intranet.eandm.com/it/_vti_bin/client.svc/ProcessQuery HTTP/1.1
So it had something to do with Permissions. I checked the Authentication and the sites that worked had Forms Auth Enabled, and the ones that didn't, didn't have forms Auth enabled. Enabling it manually was no go.
I then went though the web.config on the working and non-working sites and there were some differences. The Authentication was Forms on the working site, Windows on the nonworking. There was many things not present. httpModules section was missing,
Many of the Microsoft Identity /Authentication lines etc.
So I Basically took the web.config from the working site and copied it to the non-working site preserving the following line from the original web.config:
<machineKey validationKey="{key}" decryptionKey="{key}" validation="{hash}" />
After that I had Security Issues, Though I think this was Caused by the July 2014 CU making everything use the Microsoft Identity parts, where as the server I was porting form had the sites created before the July 2014 CU. (though both were at the same level)
Even though all of the users were present in the site security, I had to Drop and re-add them to every site/and list with special Perms.
With the Security Fixed, I no longer received the Error "The server was unable to save the form at this time. Please try again"
Knock on wood its all functioning fine.

FF20 - The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading

Hello,
Since FF starts to upgrate itself to FF20 in some of ours PCs, it doesn't load sites and write:
(in some PCs it s possible to load the google page and make a search, but not opening any link)
"The connection was reset
The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading."
I erased all the data (all the history) this doesn't solved the problem
I tried ff21 beta, i had the same problem.
And only the downgrade to FF19 solved the problem.
The firewall + apps/url filtering don't show any problems...
What it could be?
Thanks

I'm having the same problem but with links on all sites (even emails) and the advertisements.
What do you mean by your apps/url filter??? Is this in the Firewall if so I have already checked there.
I have also went here https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/954665 but nothing changed.

I keep get this messege The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading. when I try to log in in some site like hotmail and photobucket

The connection was reset
The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few
moments.
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network
connection.
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure
that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.
and my internet is connect and every thing fine with web site that I don't have register or response

Thanks for responding, David. Using <Esc> and <CtrlW> might reduce the time in returning to the other tab, but does little when the triggering of a wanton alarm is very frequent. The connections I have used were extremely reliable and fast. I am using at this moment a 54 Mbps WiFi connection that lives up to its ratings in downloading & uploading data; yet, as shown in the attached image, I still get this worthless alarm. I do not know if this problem happens with my regular ISP since I have been using this tiny notebook only when traveling -- will test that once I am back mostly for curiosity, but even then if then the alarm were not triggered this would be of little consolation, since other browsers do not have the problem right now).
As a moderator, I urge you to ask the Mozilla-powers-to-be why there is no way to turn off the alarm with, say, a true/false switch in about:config (mind you, there is still old-versions junk in this config list, so it isn't we are talking about amending the constitution). Complains about this fugly alarm can be traced in the web as far back as 2010 at least. Besides, what is the advantage of the alarm for the average user? When FF users are still posing amazingly basic questions in forums of Firefox or Mozilla support, such an alarm ought to be _off_ by default and should be an option of advanced settings menu. This annoyance shows how much the critical focus on keeping a simple GUI uncluttered by trivial or higher-level messages still needs to evolve for Firefox, which I have used it since it was known a Firebird. Guess will have to switch to Chrome now while abroad.
Happy Holidays

Fiinding MEMORY,CPU usage trend since the server was installed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for