File naming: sequencing by date

In the Filename Template Editor and Rename Photos (F2) function, I'd like to be able to sequence my file names by date, with the sequence beginning with 1 for each day, and incrementing regardless how many imports I do.
For example, the first image for January 2, 2008 might be called "08-01-02_001". On that day I may perform three or four imports, and the sequence continues to increment from 001 to however many images I import on that day. The following day the sequence automatically resets to 1.
If images are imported that were recorded on an earlier date, this function would have to increment from the highest number of the date the image was recorded (because this is how Lightroom's date function works). For example, if on December 28, 2007 I shot 243 images and today I import another image that was shot on that day, the file name would be 07-12-28_244.
(I currently sequence by month, manually specifying the start number for each import sequence, but I sometimes forget to change the sequence starting number.)
Thank you for all you've done. I can't imagine working without Lightroom.

I would like to see exactly the same enhancement. Perhaps for some file naming schemes it would be helpful to parameterize that function, e.g., "Resent sequence number [to xxx] whenever [date|month|year|camera ...] changes].
As part of that, I would like very much to have more options/control for the file organization. In particular, I would like to see yyyy/yyyymm/yyyymmdd (e.g., 2008/2008-01/2008-01-15 with the "-" being optional). Right now, the closest you can come to that is yyyy/mm/dd, which leaves too much opportunity for file/folder name confusion.
dds

Similar Messages

  • File Naming for Image Sequence to work properly?

    Hi,
    I shot about a 226 shot time lapse this weekend and so far having a severe pain getting it to be a time lapse movie in photoshop.
    Shots were 3 minutes apart.
    Originally I tried using the RAW images, then exported them to full size jpeg, then finally exported them to HD video resolution jpegs thinking format might be part of my issue. But it seems to be more of a naming convention problem.
    Originally tried :
    AAA-XXX-<4 digit shot #>-20100508.<ext> & AAA-XXX-<4 digit shot #>-20100509.<ext>  as it spanned over night. Once sequence was loaded I then saved as PSD before trying to export.
    That would only load the very first image, even though it would come up with the frame rate question.
    Then I shorted it to 0508-HHMMSS.jpg & 0509-HHMMSS.jpg and set the frame rate to 10 frames per second. It warned "This sequence has gaps". Once sequence was loaded I then saved as PSD before trying to export.
    This created a 36 minute timeline in CS5 but the opening image was the one I selected, and then about 36 minutes of blank, with a random image from somewhere in the middle of the scene being the last frame.
    I tried this in both CS5 and CS4 thinking it may be a bug just in CS5.. but I get the exact same results.
    What naming convention is the Image Sequencing 'open' really looking for to work properly. I would have thought that either of the above would have worked.. but so far they are not.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Using Adobe Photoshop CS5 & CS4.
    Christopher

    I did just do a generic 1.2.3.4.5.6. export up to 226 and that seems to have worked. But I don't think I should have to do that and the image sequence function should be able to handle more agile file naming sequences.
    Christopher

  • Remember file renaming sequence

    Is it possible for LR3 to remember a file naming sequence for a folder.  That is, each time I move images to a folder can the rename sequence previously applied to that folder be recalled along with the current sequece number so that additional files can be added?
    Thanks.

    Look what's the last file's sequence number in that folder and rename new files starting with the next number.
    By the way, why do you move files around once they have been injested/imported? I'd take a look at my workflow if that involves moving files into folder along the workflow path.
    Also, the very fact of renaming files is a bad idea. The name should be as an identifier: unique and constant over the file's life time.

  • Sequence Number By Date Option For File Naming

    I would like to see Lightroom have the option to have the sequence numbers be reset when the date changes and increment accordingly. For example, I have the file naming set to use Date (YYYYMMDD) Sequence Number (0001) and the sequence number starting at 1. As Lightroom is now I will end up with 200909010001, 200909010002, 200909020003, 200909020004, 200909030005 200909030006 etc. and what I would like to see is the option for 200909010001, 200909010002, 200909020001, 200909020002, 200909030001 200909030002.
    This would make it much faster for renaming or import when using this combination of date and sequence in file names.

    Hi
    For the Transport Protocol "File Transfer Protocol (FTP)" files are always processed in ascending alphabetical order
    If you want the file to be processed in sequence then you can use Quality of Service EOIO in the sender adapter.
    The files are processed in the sequence they are picked up.
    otherwise use BPM for File Sequencing..
    Refer the following Threads
    FTP Sender Adapter - Processing Sequence
    Processing Sequence issue of FTP protocol
    Regards
    Abhijit
    Edited by: Abhijit Bolakhe on Nov 4, 2009 10:32 AM

  • LR2 File naming on import problem, date and time not from photo

    Hi all,
    I think I've run into a bug or inconsistency regarding the file naming in LR2. All my photos are named after the template YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS-XXXX.dng, where XXXX is the original file ID number and the rest is the capture date and time. This has worked excellently in 1.1 through 1.4.1.
    In LR2 this template, on import, doesn't use the capture time from the photo for naming but rather the _current_ time when the import happens. In the template editor you don't get to choose what time to apply, as the fields are simply called "Minute", "Second", etc.
    If I, however, use the function Library > Rename photos... on the new batch of photos after import, and apply the exact same template, they are correctly renamed to match their capture date.
    This is with LR 2.0 on Mac OS X 10.5.4 on PowerPC. Anyone else see the same thing?

    This is a reported bug.

  • File naming with sequence

    My editor requires that I name a file as in the following example:
    FI_RX_London(sequence number)
    if I try this while importing using file name with sequence, there will be a - sign in front of the number. My question, how do I remove the - sign

    In the import dialog, pick Filename-Sequence from the drop down File Naming list. (you will have done this already). Now click the drop-down list again and choose Edit. You will now see the Filename Template Editor window; remove the hyphen from the text box that shows
    {Filename>>}-{Sequence #(1)>>}. When you edit this, you will see the example just above it, reflect the change.

  • File Naming with parts of names and dates (substrings)

    I am trying to settle on a filenaming convention that Lightroom doesn't support, but does exist in Breezebrowser and in many database languages.
    It is a function that allows using just part of one of the other available file naming elements, instead of the full thing. This helps keep file names shorter but still meaningful.
    For example, one piece of the naming convention I'm trying for is just the sequential number generated by my camera, but without the camera specific designator. For file '_C8P7692', for example, I just want to use the '7692' part.
    This could be accomplished if I could specify in the file name builder that I only want to use those characters. It would look something like:
    SUBSTRING(filename,5,4), where 5 is the character I want to start with, and 4 is the number of characters I want to take.
    This would also address some of the other feature requests for variations on the date formats built into the file name builder.
    Paul Wasserman

    You can do that one in LR easily.
    Use "(filename or original) number suffix" instead of "filename".

  • Does anyone know where the iWeb data files are located or what they are called?  I can't find them.  I looked in Finder for files named the same as my website, but found nothing.  Any help would be appreciated.

    Does anyone know where the iWeb data files are located or what they are called?  I can't find them.  I looked in Finder for files named the same as my website, but found nothing.  Any help would be appreciated.

    If you erased or replaced your hard drive since iWeb was cancelled, then they are gone. Otherwise, if you have maintained backups then check those.
    Usually such files are in the /Home/Library/ folder or a sub-folder.
    Exposing the /Home/Library/ Folder
    Pick one of the following methods:
    A. This method will make the folder visible permanently. Open the Terminal application in your Utilities folder and paste the following at the command prompt:
    chflags nohidden ~/Library
    Press RETURN.
    B. Click on the Desktop, press the OPTION (⌥) button, select Library from the Finder's Go menu.
    C. Select Go To Folder from the Finder's Go menu. Paste the following in the path field:
    ~/Library
    Press the Go button.

  • File naming

    I'm new to the Mac, new to Aperture 3 (running Trial at the moment). Came from PC and PS CS2 and Adobe Bridge. I have most of my pics in folders organized by date (2008-01-13) and inside the folders, the pics have their original file names - img7832.cr2, etc.
    Upon importing (I've just tried a few folders), I choses a naming scheme such as Boston2008-01-13_img7832.cr2. I left unchecked the rename Masters because I wasn't sure if that was a good idea or not. What do you think of this naming scheme? Or would you toss out the original file name and put the date in front - such as 2008-01-13_Boston. I'm kind of at a loss as to what down the road is going to be most beneficial when it comes to locating photos or to sorting methods. Are underscores necessary between the various components? I do mostly travel and nature photography and and have generally keyworded in the past to find my pictures. I've scanned forums, etc., but haven't found any really good advice on this. I'd appreciate any thoughts
    Reading a bit further, maybe a counter is what I need, such as 2008-01-13Boston001, etc. If I understand that correctly, as I import further pictures to that project, they will just continue the counter (002,003,etc). I only need to remember to reset the counter if I'm going to import into a different project (assuming I don't already have pics in the other project, in which case I would start the counter with the last number in the project + 1).
    And returning to the date issue - is there a benefit in having the Date fields at the beginning of the file name? If you were searching for dates, wouldn't the search pull from the date info that is already inside the picture file?
    Again, I'm asking for those with some years of experience under their belts, as to their opinions and any downfalls they see with my various schemes.
    I should also mention that I'm thinking about letting Aperture "manage" the files, since I have about 100GB to import and I have a 1TB hard drive. If I run out down the road somewhere (I'll probably be dead before then. , then I'm thinking I can just transfer the library to an external and point to it there.
    Thanks!
    Mark

    Hi Mark. You seem to have this pretty well thought through. I'll tell you what I do, just as foil to better refine your scheme, and then I post some comments further down in-line with your questions.
    I use this Naming Convention every time I import my photos into Aperture:
    (Image Date)_(Custom Name)_(Sequence Number)_(Master File Name).
    I use a Referenced Masters storage system (highly rec'd for all but the most simple installations) with my raw files stored on an external HD. I have Aperture auto-file them by YYYY/MM/DD. I have deliberately built a degree of redundancy into my system. The general idea is that all images should have unique names, and I should be able to roughly identify and exactly re-file an file based on name alone.
    (Image Date)
    Starting with this allows me to easy sort files by file name. It is meaningful and useful to me and to the computer.
    (Custom Name)
    I store all my images in Aperture's Library in Projects based on shoots. Roughly, one Project per shoot. (If I have only two shots in a Project, I don't worry about it. If I have more than 60 (after stacking) I tend to break them into Albums within the Project.) "Custom Name" allows me to input two pieces of information per shoot which are important to me: "Shoot Name" and "Shoot Location". I type these into the field provided at the time of import as " ShootName_ShootLocation ". This allows me to keep a bit of useful descriptive text attached to the file (and available without opening or previewing it or even having it on my machine).
    (Sequence Number)
    Self-explanatory.
    (Master File Name)
    Useful when one has more than one camera at a shoot, and also should anything go wrong during import (I rotate cards and don't re-format them until I put them back in a camera).
    ATHiker95 wrote:
    I'm new to the Mac, new to Aperture 3 (running Trial at the moment). Came from PC and PS CS2 and Adobe Bridge. I have most of my pics in folders organized by date (2008-01-13) and inside the folders, the pics have their original file names - img7832.cr2, etc.
    Important: you are creating two separate filing schemes in your use of Aperture: one for files, and one for images. Imho, there is no reason to use any time- or date-based scheme for your image storage (date and time are hard-tagged to each image and Aperture provides ample tools to sort and filter by date and time (and day and month and year)).
    Upon importing (I've just tried a few folders), I choses a naming scheme such as Boston2008-01-13_img7832.cr2. I left unchecked the rename Masters because I wasn't sure if that was a good idea or not. What do you think of this naming scheme?
    I always rename Masters. There is no reason not to.
    Or would you toss out the original file name and put the date in front - such as 2008-01-13_Boston.
    Both. See above.
    I'm kind of at a loss as to what down the road is going to be most beneficial when it comes to locating photos or to sorting methods.
    Again, remember that are creating two distinct storage/filing/retrieval systems (files and images). Your file naming convention should be designed to help you locate and identify files outside of Aperture. Inside Aperture you can make extensive use of Folders, Projects, Albums, Keywords, Labels, and Flags to bring you whatever functionality you desire.
    Are underscores necessary between the various components?
    The time when this was useful because some computers couldn't handle spaces in file names is past. I do it out of habit.
    I do mostly travel and nature photography and and have generally keyworded in the past to find my pictures. I've scanned forums, etc., but haven't found any really good advice on this. I'd appreciate any thoughts
    Keyword extensively. Use keywords naturally and personally. Your keywords are for you to help you find your files. (Assuming you are not going to sell Stock Photos.)
    Reading a bit further, maybe a counter is what I need, such as 2008-01-13Boston001, etc. If I understand that correctly, as I import further pictures to that project, they will just continue the counter (002,003,etc).
    I don't think so. The counter, afaik, counts the number of images in the import.
    I only need to remember to reset the counter if I'm going to import into a different project (assuming I don't already have pics in the other project, in which case I would start the counter with the last number in the project + 1).
    Seems complicated and likely to fail due to user error.
    And returning to the date issue - is there a benefit in having the Date fields at the beginning of the file name? If you were searching for dates, wouldn't the search pull from the date info that is already inside the picture file?
    Inside Aperture, there is no advantage whatsoever. Outside Aperture, there is a significant advantage.
    Again, I'm asking for those with some years of experience under their belts, as to their opinions and any downfalls they see with my various schemes.
    I should also mention that I'm thinking about letting Aperture "manage" the files, since I have about 100GB to import and I have a 1TB hard drive. If I run out down the road somewhere (I'll probably be dead before then. , then I'm thinking I can just transfer the library to an external and point to it there.
    Highly recommend a Referenced Masters system from the get-go. Terry Devlin (iirc) has many sensible posts on this here -- search the forum.
    Thanks!
    Mark
    Good Luck!
    Message was edited by: Kirby Krieger

  • File naming, archiving and time management

    I've posted on this subject before, but I have a new twist that I'd like to get some feedback on.
    I usually import my photos, keeping the master (now called original) file name until the end of the calendar year.  At the end of the year, I like to change the original name for classification and archiving purposes.  By then, I've usually made all of the deletions for the year, so I feel comfortable renaming the photos with some sort of counter or index.  My preferred classification system is: "Custom Name"/"Image Date_"/"Counter" (0000).
    The problem that I'm experiencing is that it is impossible to rename my originals using this format without some inaccuracies if I try to name them all at once without readjusting the computer's internal time zone settings.  I live on the east coast, so if I have a photo shot at 10:30 pm PDT on 2011-03-14, it gets named with a date of 2011-03-15, which obviously isn't accurate for when that photo was shot.  Well, it is accurate based on East Coast Time, but I want the file to be renamed with the date that it was shot, where it was shot, not where my computer currently resides.  Of course, I could rename the batch of 2011 photos in segments, but that would mean multiple quits/reopens from Aperture in order to change the time zone appropriately.
    It seems that my only choices are to either rename my photos at the time of import using the correct time zone settings on my computer, or to not use this renaming format.  Neither of these options are very appealing, since this renaming format is my preferred method.
    I guess my question is: does anyone have any insights or advice on either how to better work around this problem, or if not, other renaming methods that they like to use for archival and organizational purposes?  I know there are many to choose from, but I'm looking for something simple, which also provides direct information about the image, should I want to reference my Originals (which I do outside of Aperture from time to time).
    Thanks for adding to this discussion...
    mac

    Allen,
    SierraDragon wrote:
    mac-
    Personally I create a folder for each Project and copy pix from CF card into those folders. Then I import from the backup hard drive into Aperture using the folder name as the Project name.
    Usually each Project includes only one day or less, and I may have YYMMDD_JonesWed_A, YYMMDD_JonesWed_B, etc. for a large or multiday shoot. I do not let any Project contain more than ~400 Nikon D2x RAW+JPEG files.
    Projects are just that and never put into folders other than by month and/or year, just a forever chronological list. All organizing is done via Albums and Keywords. JonesWed_2011 is a keyword that can be an Album instantly when needed; bride is a keyword; wed is a keyword; flower is a keyword; etc.
    I use wedding just as an example. The process applies to all kinds of shoots.
    I use the 1-9999 Nikon auto-numbering of image files, and never rename image files except  sometimes during export. That way original image names can always be found across mass storage devices in the future independent of any application.
    -Allen
    SierraDragon wrote:
    Usually each Project includes only one day or less, and I may have YYMMDD_JonesWed_A, YYMMDD_JonesWed_B, etc. for a large or multiday shoot. I do not let any Project contain more than ~400 Nikon D2x RAW+JPEG files.
    Why do you keep the photo count in a project to around 400 files or so?  Is it detrimental to speed, or are there other considerations that have led you to work this way?
    SierraDragon wrote:
    Projects are just that and never put into folders other than by month and/or year, just a forever chronological list. All organizing is done via Albums and Keywords. JonesWed_2011 is a keyword that can be an Album instantly when needed; bride is a keyword; wed is a keyword; flower is a keyword; etc.
    So, you are saying that you sometimes put projects into folders by month and/or year?  Or, do you just keep all projects at the top level of the hierarchy?  The only folders I use are at the top of my hierarchy, and they are by year, 2002, 2003, 2004...2012.  I then keep all of my projects in the appropriate year.  I used to keep folders that were named things like, "Travel", "Occasions"..., but this became problematic when I had overlap, and images could fit in more than one designated folder.
    SierraDragon wrote:
    I use the 1-9999 Nikon auto-numbering of image files, and never rename image files except  sometimes during export. That way original image names can always be found across mass storage devices in the future independent of any application.
    It sounds as though you don't actually rename your images at all, but rather just keep the original names.  I don't like to do this because after deletions, it creates gaps in my sequence, and I also end up with multiple images with the same name.  I like for each image to have its own unique identifier by name.
    I'm considering importing the images using a version name, where the version is named by the image date.  I'll keep the original file name intact until the end of the year, and then, should I decide to rename my files, I could base my renaming system off of the version name.  This will automatically capture the date of the image without being reliant on my computer's time zone settings.

  • Problem with File Naming when Importing in LR 3

    When I previously imported in LR 2, under File Naming, I used a custom template:
    {Custom Text}_{Date(YY)>>}_Sequence # (001)>>}.  Sometimes I added custom text and it showed up in my file name and other times I didn’t and then the file name just included the Date and the Sequence # without the Custom Text.
    I am having a problem when importing in LR 3.  The dialog box on the right is now called File Renaming instead of File Naming. I am using the same Custom Template I used when importing in LR 2.  There is a line in the dialog box for Custom Text as there was in LR 2.  If I add a custom text name, it shows up at the beginning of the file name correctly as it did in LR 2.  But if I leave it blank, you’ll remember in LR 2 the resultant file name just included the Date and Sequence #, but in LR 3 the file name now is “untitled_Date_Sequence #”.
    How do I do this so it doesn’t have “untitled” in the file name?
    Thanks,
    Matthew Kraus

    Thanks for reply.  I am using Windows 7 64 bit. I am using 'Copy", not copy to DNG. There are 2 screen shots attached.  The first screen shot is from LR2 and you can see there is no "untitled" in the file name example.  The second is from LR3 and you can see "untitled" is in the first part of the file name in the example.  Do you need any other information?
    Tnaks,
    Matthew Kraus

  • Power of File Naming during import

    Can you append the HH (Hour) MM (Minute) SS (Second) that the photo was shot to the name while importing?
    I have read that Aperture will not allow files to be renamed after in the Library to follow along with being non destructive. However I do not see renaming files or appending Meta Data in IPTC as being destructive and should not be ignored if the Photographer desires that to be part of his/her workflow.
    I am sure that some third party programmers will write Automator scripts to accomplish many of the things that Aperture will be lacking in.
    I am curious as to the power and functionality of Naming digital files as they are imported. I know that they can be tagged with YYMMDD. I have Read the Getting Started but want to know if HHMMSS can be appended also. I have searched the Internet for a naming convention that is very flexible and unique. When files are imported you do not know and can not say what is in each file, so better renaming and IPTC editing should be support post import. I do not consider preImport or during the best place to do this in Post Production. I think this can best be accomplished after using Aperture's Great Meta tagging tools.
    I have accepted for for the majority of my workflow that Files should only be named once, and only tagged with a different name on an export. (Like appendning some Keywords).
    I used to use a Random, Sequentually generated SN, but think now that the Date is nearly Unique (execpt Multiple Shots a second, or from other cameras at the same time.) I think that this SN to be tagged on the photo is more helpful.
    Does any body recommend a powerful naming convention for digital image files?
    Here is the naming Scheme that I am thinking of.
    YYMMDD-HHMMSSx.CR2
    X - is 0 through 9 to account for multiple shots a second.
    I was planning on using the sequential numbering. This will allow me to easily speak out differenced between multiple files in a stack by speaking the last number which will usually be unique.
    I have also thought about YYMMDD-ABC-HHMMSSx.cr2 (ABC would identify the roll) which is similar to what I have used, but I am do not like ABC now because it might mislead me or not mean anything at all.
    What is everybody using, and what is working for you???
    (and again)
    Can you append the HH (Hour) MM (Minute) SS (Second) that the photo was shot to the name while importing?
    PowerMac G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    Yes, after playing with it at home, I confirm the same things. All of the - (dashes) and .(dots) and 'PM' is wasteful, and aperture will not even show that full name.
    Naming is a Huge deal. The photos will not be in Aperture forever, and when they come back out during an export or whatever, they should be how you want them. Not having control makes using aperture as a Library for your photos and projects weak.
    If Aperture starts at the import from digital media, then naming happens only after that point. If I have to rename files before importing them into aperture then, I have to skip Aperture's first Steps.
    When I name photos I have in the past tagged some keywords to the file name. Stacks and smart albums would do great to help, but after I put all of the work into naming and organizing, the filenames can not be set to what I want them to be.
    This means that I would still have to use a 3rd party app to organize sort and name all photos then import to aperture.
    Now the Stacks functionality, and keyword tagging can be skipped in Aperture. What is left are versions, working with RAW and smart albums. And Spotlight would do just as good of a job searching for photos this way.
    I do not want to knock Aperture, but I have to accept that it is a learning curve. I need to learn what it can do for me to save time. And I need to learn what it will not do so that I can stay away from it. I was really looking forword to it being my post production SW.
    I would like for something like this.
    YYMMDD-HHMMSSx-Grouping Keyword(IPTC)-1 of 7(in stack)
    This would use the Keyword and IPTC That you work hard to set in aperture, and also the stacking. Then when they are exported to clients, or for backup, web, or use when aperture has reached EOL, then it can be very useful.
    I like that iPhoto has 3rd party extensions to use Keywords to Save in photo or extract from photo to add to iPhoto Library. I am a little more afraid of Aperture because it is a closed system. If a 3rd party app sets keywords to a photo or renames it, what info would be lost in Aperture.
    Thanks for all of the thougts.

  • Vaildating File name with the data in the file using sender file adapter

    Hi,
    Below is the scenario
    1)       Pick up files from a FTP server, the file name is dynamic, how do I put dynamic name in sender file adapter?
    2)       Determine if the user correctly named the file based on data in the file.
    a.       File naming structure that we will be concerned with is <company_code><accounting_time_period>.<extension>
    b.      The company code and the time period in the file name have to match the data in the file.
    i.      For example.  If the file name is 1001_200712.csv and the data in the file is for company code 1005, time period 200712, the file is incorrectly named.  Both values must be correct.
    How do we do this?

    Hi Sachin,
                    As Rightly said by Krishna, You can not put Dynamic name in sender File Adapter .You have to provide the name of the file like "*.txt" in Sender Adapter and at runtime you can access this file name by using following UDF:
    DynamicConfiguration conf  = (DynamicConfiguration) container
      .getTransformationParameters()
      .get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
    DynamicConfigurationKey key = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File","FileName");
    String valueOld = conf.get(key);
    return (valueOld);
    As now you have picked up the file name at runtime.
    Now concatenate source file fields Company_code and Accounting_timeperiod using "_" as delimiter in properties.Also concat the extension .Now you have required file name.
    So using EQUALS standard function ,compare it with File Name fetched at runtime using above given UDF, and pass result as you desire to process further or not or to raise Alert to resend the file.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anurag Garg
    You can validate this file name in Mapping itself.

  • File selection sequence in the FTP connection for File Sender Adapter

    Hi,
    I have a file to Proxy scenario using FTP connection parameters.
    If there are multiple files in the sender folder, XI picks up the files randomly with no processing sequence.
    I want XI to pick up the files based on the date time stamp meaning the  oldest file created in the folder should be processes first and rest all in sequence there after.
    I know processing sequence can be set for NFS connection but not for FTP .
    Please suggest if there's any way to make this work.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Amit Bhagwat.
    Edited by: Amit Bhagwat on Nov 4, 2009 5:17 AM

    Hi
    For the Transport Protocol "File Transfer Protocol (FTP)" files are always processed in ascending alphabetical order
    If you want the file to be processed in sequence then you can use Quality of Service EOIO in the sender adapter.
    The files are processed in the sequence they are picked up.
    otherwise use BPM for File Sequencing..
    Refer the following Threads
    FTP Sender Adapter - Processing Sequence
    Processing Sequence issue of FTP protocol
    Regards
    Abhijit
    Edited by: Abhijit Bolakhe on Nov 4, 2009 10:32 AM

  • Can iOS 8 Photos sort by File Name insted of Date?

    I want to sync a set of folders from my windows 8.1 pc to my iPhone 5c running iOS 8.  when i sync with iTunes the folders in the photos app show in right order. the problem is the photos are not in ordered and I named all my files in sequence.  below is a example how I have folders named with file names.  maybe someone can give me advice so I can get my photos for being so random.
    Misfile- Book #01:
    20040223_Z1ow.jpg
    20040224_4y0E.jpg
    20040225_U00r.jpg
    20040226_Q8j6.jpg
    Misfile- Book #02:
    20041130_PiTf.jpg
    20041201_y4Pi.jpg
    20041203_EB4A.jpg
    that is how my file structure is in windows but when I sync to my iPhone my actual photos are scattered all out of order.  any ideas???
    thanks in advance, Alice

    Since it is not possible is ther a app in the App Store someone could recomend

Maybe you are looking for