File System I/O sizes

There seems to be a difference in file systems I/O sizes between Solarias 2.5 and Solaris 8. Last time I cause to examie low level Solaris I/O on a SCSI analyzer was on version 2.5. At that time the OS usually issued I/O of 8 or 16 blocks no larger than 244. Recently I was examing a Fibre Channel trace were Solaris 8 was doing 8000 block transfers. Does any one know when these changes took place?

borahshadow wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm new to Arch but not new to Linux. I've been trying to install Arch for the first time and I can't get it to work.
I started to install it and I got about to the point where I run pacstrap and I started getting Ext4-fs I/O errors.
How did you do the installation? I ask because...
borahshadow wrote:"Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 3146272, lost async page write."
This isn't your SSD, but your live environment running out of disk space. You wouldn't get these errors if your SSD was mounted and you were installing to it (rather than the mapped device).

Similar Messages

Resized partitions how to fix file system to new size.

So I had to resize my /boot partition which required me to resize my root partition. How do I fix the file system to match the new size of the partition?

I do not understand why this was moved? This is not a new install, I was tuning my hooks to use systemd replaceing udev, autodetect and base.
running
mkinitcpio -p Linux
resulted in an error that said there was not enough space. and that the image was probably not correctly made.
I based my decision on the placement of the post by the following post which seemed to be in the same category.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=173359
Is there a place that provides a more narrow definition of topics that are acceptable for fourm categories?

Expanding root file system size

Hi,
I am using Solaris 10 in VMware.
I have increased the virtual disk size in Vmware console from 10 GB to 18GB. What commands should i run to affect this changes in my / file system.
Below is the df -h output.
bash-3.00# df -h
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c0d1s0 6.4G 3.4G 3.0G 54% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 1.1G 960K 1.1G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
sharefs 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/dfs/sharetab
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap 1.1G 40K 1.1G 1% /tmp
swap 1.1G 28K 1.1G 1% /var/run
/dev/dsk/c0d1s7 2.8G 2.9M 2.8G 1% /export/home
bash-3.00#
Thanks in Advance
Raja Challagulla

Hi Bob,
Thanks for giving reply.
Below is the output.
bash-3.00# prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c0d1s2
* /dev/rdsk/c0d1s2 partition map
* Dimensions:
* 512 bytes/sector
* 63 sectors/track
* 255 tracks/cylinder
* 16065 sectors/cylinder
* 1304 cylinders
* 1302 accessible cylinders
* Flags:
* 1: unmountable
* 10: read-only
* Unallocated space:
* First Sector Last
* Sector Count Sector
* 0 1124550 1124549
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
0 2 00 1124550 13687380 14811929 /
1 3 01 48195 1076355 1124549
2 5 00 0 20916630 20916629
7 8 00 14811930 6088635 20900564 /export/home
8 1 01 0 16065 16064
9 9 01 16065 32130 48194
bash-3.00#
Please let me know if you need any details.
Thanks
Raja Challagulla

Export 500gb database size to a 100gb file system space in oracle 10g

Hi All,
Please let me the know the procedure to export 500gb database to a 100gb file system space. Please let me know the procedure.

user533548 wrote:
Hi Linda,
The database version is 10g and OS is linux. Can we use filesize parameter for the export. Please advice on this.FILESIZE will limit the size of a file in case you specify multiple dumpfiles. You could also could specify multiple dump directory (in different FS) when given multiple dumpfiles.
For instance :
dumpfile=dump_dir1:file1,dump_dir2:file2,dump_dir3:file3...Nicolas.

How increase external disk size used for an existing file system, Solaris10

Configuration:
Server: Sun T5220
S/O: Solaris 10 5/08 s10s_u5wos_10 SPARC
Storage: EMC AX4-5
EMC PowerPath: PowerPath Version 5.2
I have the following scenario:
In AX4-5 storage array, I created two LUNs into RAID Group 10, with Raid Type1/0:
LUN 101: 20Gb
LUN 102: 10Gb
Both LUNs were added to Storage Group (SG1) that includes two Servers (Server1 and Server2); both servers have Operating System Solaris 10 5/8 and Power Path.
The servers detect both LUNs across two paths. With Power Path were created a virtual path (emcpower0a, emcpower1a) to access to each LUNs respectively.
We have mounted two file system /home/tes1 over emcpower0a -> LUN101 and /home/tes2 over emcpower1a -> LUN102.
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/emcpower0a 20G 919M 19G 5% /home/test1
/dev/dsk/emcpower1a 10G 9G 1G 90% /home/test2
I want to increase the space in file system /home/test2, without lost the information that I have stored and using the same LUN, LUN 102. To do this I start with the following steps:
1- Create new LUN, LUN 103 with 15Gb into RAID Group 10. Result: OK, I have available space in RAID Group 10.
2- Add LUN 103 to LUN 102, using concatenation option. Result: OK. This action creates a new metaLUN with the same characteristics of LUN 102, but with new space of 25Gb.
After to do these actions, I want to know how Solaris recognize this new space. What I need to do, to increase the size of file system /home/test2 to 25 Gb. Is that possible?
I reviewed the description of each disk using format command, and the disks not have any change.
Could anyone help me? If you need more detail, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thanks in advance.

Robert, thank a lot for your know how. You helped me to clarify some doubts. To complete your answer, I will add two more details, based on my experience.
After to execute, type -> auto configure and label, the disk was created with different partitions like root, swap, usr, like this:
Volume name = < >
ascii name = <DGC-RAID10-0223 cyl 49150 alt 2 hd 32 sec 12>
pcyl = 49152
ncyl = 49150
acyl = 2
nhead = 32
nsect = 12
Part Tag Flag Cylinders Size Blocks
0 root wm 0 - 682 128.06MB (683/0/0) 262272
1 swap wu 683 - 1365 128.06MB (683/0/0) 262272
2 backup wu 0 - 49149 9.00GB (49150/0/0) 18873600
3 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
4 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
5 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
6 usr wm 1366 - 49149 8.75GB (47784/0/0) 18349056
7 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
This was not convenient because all information stored appear in the first slice and growfs not work if appear root or swap slice into the disk, for that reason was necesary to recreate manually every slice with partition command. The final result was this:
Part Tag Flag Cylinders Size Blocks
0 unassigned wm 0 - 49149 9.00GB (49150/0/0) 18873600
1 unassigned wu 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
2 backup wu 0 - 49149 9.00GB (49150/0/0) 18873600
3 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
4 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
5 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
6 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
7 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
Now, execute again the label command to save the new information.
Mount file system and execute:
growfs M file_system mount_point to expand the file system to 9Gb.

Solaris 10 - File System Size / Layout

Hello, I�m very new to Solaris OS � UNIX world and have a question around the file system.
I have SUN System with a single 36GB of Hard Disk, and eventually I want to install Oracle 10g on it as a development server for myself.
My question is around the file system size and layout
I have installed Solaris 10 and accepted the default file system, which is as below:
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 5.0G 3.4G 1.6G 69% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 1.5G 1.1M 1.5G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap1.so.1 5.0G 3.4G 1.6G 69% /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr.so.1
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap1.so.1 5.0G 3.4G 1.6G 69% /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap 1.5G 136K 1.5G 1% /tmp
swap 1.5G 88K 1.5G 1% /var/run
/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s7 28G 28M 28G 1% /export/home
What I don�t understand is when I eventually install Oracle, where will the directory go for it?
The /home/export folder is aprrox: 28GB which is now taking up most of the space, and I understand that this is for users, therefore my question is:
1.Should I have allocated a more space to the root file system for oracle during the OS install?
2. If so what should I do? (its not a production system and I know it will have to go somewhere on the single drive, I�m happy to rebuild as I�m still learning the OS).
Any suggestions?
Rgds
D

Thanks, I do have this but needed info on the file system layout... but I have the info now...
If you select the auto file system layout on Solaris 10 then it gives the remaining space to the home/export . I have since re-installed, customised the file system layout and have space for the database.
D

Setting the file system size for the emulator

Hi,
I am trying to set the file system size of the emulator so I can test what happens when the system is full and I try to write to the file system. I am using WTK 2.5.1 and I went into preferences -> storage and set Storage size to 10KB. But when I run the emulator and check the available size of the root directories using:
try {
         Enumeration roots = FileSystemRegistry.listRoots();
         while (roots.hasMoreElements()) {
            String dir = (String) roots.nextElement();
            FileConnection fc = (FileConnection) Connector.open( "file:///" + dir );
            System.out.println( "Available Size on " + dir + " : "+ fc.availableSize());
            fc.close();
      } catch ( IOException ex ) {
         ex.printStackTrace();
}I get the remaining size of my pc's hard drive, not what is remaining from the 10KB I set.
Can you tell me the correct way to do this? I don't want to fill up my pc's hard drive in order to test this!!

Has anyone got an answer to this?

Increase file system size

Hello,
I have solaris9 system where on disk c0t0d0, I have 7 partitions. The first partition shows file system mounted=yes with 10GB space. This file system is near full ( 95% used). I need to increase the size. How can I do that?
I have another partition that shows 30GB and file system mounted=no. Can I create a file system to use this 30 GB? Does it disturb existing file system?
Appreciate your help.

I agree with the guest poster a few posts up. This could be a unique opportunity to think about Bike Trials something that she would really love to do.
Instead of just looking at what's available, think first about what you really want - what would be Bike Trial Seller fulfilling and enjoyable. Is there anything creative she has always wanted to do?
If she loves being a nurse, look at other opportunities within this field that would not involve physical work.
If nursing is just a job, and Bike Store she doesn't enjoy it that much, then look at this as a pointer towards doing something different.
Start making Bike Shop brainstorming lists about all the jobs she would love to and could do - you will come up with something that she can feel excited about.
Edited by: cocosan on May 12, 2009 1:39 AM

Expand file system size

Dears
Can we expand mounted file system+ size on solris 10 ???, knowing that I'm not using SVM
Thanks

And you're asking this question in the Solaris 9 forum?
The answer is yes in both cases, though. 'growfs' will expand a mounted UFS filesystem.
It doesn't help you create the space necessary to expand it, though. That can be very easy or very difficult depending on how your storage is allocated.
Darren

Clean up file system size

Hi,
I found   /dev/shm file system utilization is more in DB server as below. Please help me to reduce the space.
$ df -kh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/root_vg-rootvol
38G 3.0G   33G   9% /
tmpfs 7.8G 7.1G 792M 91% /dev/shm
Files under /dev/shm
I don’t know what these files are.
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:04 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_2
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:18 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_3
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:38 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_4
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:34 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_5
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:15 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_6
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:34 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_7
Files under /dev/shm with sizes
oracle@server01 /dev/shm
$ du -sh * | grep G
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_917525_0
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_917525_1
1.6M    ora_COGNOS_917525_2
0       ora_COGNOS_950294_0
0       ora_COGNOS_950294_1
0       ora_COGNOS_950294_10
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_100
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_101
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_102
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_103
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_104
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_105
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_106
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_107
Regards,
Bala

2790985 wrote:
Hi,
I found   /dev/shm file system utilization is more in DB server as below. Please help me to reduce the space.
$ df -kh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/root_vg-rootvol
38G 3.0G   33G   9% /
tmpfs 7.8G 7.1G 792M 91% /dev/shm
Files under /dev/shm
I don’t know what these files are.
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:04 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_2
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:18 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_3
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:38 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_4
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:34 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_5
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:15 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_6
-rw-r-----. 1 oracle oinstall 16777216 Apr 18 23:34 ora_SAPLAT02_1245213_7
Files under /dev/shm with sizes
oracle@server01 /dev/shm
$ du -sh * | grep G
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_917525_0
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_917525_1
1.6M    ora_COGNOS_917525_2
0       ora_COGNOS_950294_0
0       ora_COGNOS_950294_1
0       ora_COGNOS_950294_10
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_100
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_101
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_102
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_103
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_104
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_105
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_106
4.0M    ora_COGNOS_950294_107
Regards,
Bala
why do you think the current value is a problem?
what will be gained by making percentage smaller?
reduce value of PROCESSES parameter
post results of command below
ls -l /dev/shm
explain what you learned from what you saw
What do you see when Oracle DB has been shutdown?

Regarding increasing root file system size

Hi folks,
I need urgent help regarding increasing the rool file system size from 40gb to 72 gb by decreasing swap from 64gb to 32gb with out any loss.
please find the current partiton config:
Part Tag Flag Cylinders Size Blocks
0 root wm 6595 - 10787 40.69GB (4193/0/0) 85335936
1 swap wm 2 - 6594 64.00GB (6595/0/0) 134221440
2 backup wm 0 - 14086 136.71GB (14087/0/0) 286698624
3 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
4 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
5 unassigned wm 10788 - 14050 32.01GB (3298/0/0) 67120896
6 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
7 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
i need to change this like below.
Part Tag Flag Cylinders Size Blocks
0 root wm 3299 - 10787 72.69GB (4193/0/0) 152446656
1 swap wm 2 - 3298 32.00GB (3298/0/0) 67110720
2 backup wm 0 - 14086 136.71GB (14087/0/0) 286698624
3 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
4 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
5 unassigned wm 10788 - 14086 32.01GB (3298/0/0) 67120896
6 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
7 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
kin dlyhelp me on this....
Thanks in advance,
Prathap

Sorry, can't be done.
If it was any other filesystem than root, you could do by using SVM.
But root filesystems can't be stripes or concats. Only simple mirrors.
So SVM isnt going to work.
If the spare space was after the partiton. You might have been able to do it by the "dirty" method of manually expanding the partition and using
growfs to expand it. You would have had to do it by netbooting or cd booting since growfs can't be used on the current root.
But in any case, you can't do that either since the space if before the partition not after it.
So, reinstalling is your only option..
Well, If you have a spare disk, you might be able to copy the filesystem over to a larger partition on the other disk, growfs it and boot off that instead.
You'd want to try it on a test systen first...

Required "/" (root) file system size on UNIX for Solution Manager.

Hello SAP Gurus,
   I am setting up SAP Solution Manager 3.2 on HP-UX. It is asking me about 350MB free sapce on "/" file system for Central Instance installation and about 120MB free sapce on "/" file system for Database Instance installation.
   I am installaing everything on to shared disk which mounted under /usr/sap. Why it needs free sapce in "/" file system. Is there any workaround to get rid of this requirement, as I have very less free sapce on "/" file system and I don't want to take the risks involved in increasing this size.
   Are there any SAP recommended sizes for "/" file system?
   I stuck in the middle of setting up SAP landscape on HP-UX (11.23). I searched through the Installation documents but I couldn't find any thing helpful in this regard. It is urgent requirement to set up this so please let me know any solution or workaround ASAP.
   Any help is greatly appriciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
cvr/

Hi Vaibhav.
Normally "canonical path not available for (folder name)" means:
1. Wrong username/password. Please double check you credentials.
2. The resource cannot be linked from the portal server. Please be sure that you can connect to the next ports in windows server from the Unix Server:
a. NetBIOS Session Service TCP 139 This port is used to connect file shares for example.
b. TCP 445 The SMB (Server Message Block) protocol is used among other things for file sharing in Windows NT/2000/XP. In windows NT it ran on top of NetBT (NetBIOS over TCP/IP), which used the famous ports 137, 138 (UDP) and 139 (TCP). In Windows 2000/XP/2003, Microsoft added the possibility to run SMB directly over TCP/IP, without the extra layer of NetBT. For this they use TCP port 445.
I hope these things help somebody.
Best Regards,
Jheison A. Urzola H.

How to create a 2 digit (gigabyte) file system to be used for 3 digit tiny size files and not running out of inodes

I have a 83Gb file system that apparently is not full, but its actually full, because I have run out of inodes, and I have 10 million files in there, so I want to create another that will cater for this inode issue. My question is if I use the
newfs -T
option will it work? As its only going to be 90Gb?

You use probably a UFS file system, right ? Then in this case, use the "-i" option with a value less as 8192. 8192 is the default value for a UFS filesystem that is between 3GB and 1 TB size.
But if you want to store 10M of files, UFS will be limited to 1M per TB : 64-bit: Support of MultiterabyteUFS File Systems (System Administration Guide: Devices and File Systems)
In this case, use instead UFS a ZFS filesystem that supports 2^48 entries !!!

Mavericks Server; smbd: File system does not support 0x0, time/size attrs

So I recently installed a Mac Mini with Mavericks and Server 3.2.2 in the main office of my company and everything has been going well, minus a few expected bugs, until recently. Starting last week we've been experiencing random intervals where File Sharing stopped working altogether, and I'd been able to reboot and get it running again. Unfortunately, as I'm the Systems and Server Admin, I've been too busy to look at the logs until now (following the degradation of one of the drives in our DAT-Optic RAID system, I figured it was time to make it a priority), and I'm seeing dozens of entries in the system logs regarding the process smbd with file system does not support errors.
Here's an example.
11/19/14 9:56:21.107 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.107 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.107 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.107 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.107 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.107 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.108 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.108 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.108 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.108 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.108 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.108 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.110 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.110 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.110 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.119 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.119 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.119 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.119 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.119 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.119 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.124 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.124 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.124 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.124 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.124 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.124 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.125 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.125 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.125 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.125 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.125 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.125 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.130 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.130 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.130 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
11/19/14 9:56:21.131 AM smbd[602]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
As far as I can tell, nothing else has changed in our system except for the fact that one of the drives died and was rebuilt as of yesterday (these smbd problems extend to last week shortly after I updated to 3.2.2 I believe). Any help would be much appreciated. I would normally first attempt a repair permissions to see if the issue is related to a bad plist somewhere but the last time we did that, our ACLs were duplicated across our file share and often incorrectly. I'm not sure if it's just me but the last Mac Server software I used was Snow Leopard Server (when it was still a full OS version) and it was infinitely more stable than what I've experienced thus far with Server 3. Anyway, I appreciate any help/advice that can be given and I apologize for the rant.

Been getting the same errors for a while.
1/13/15 11:38:04.975 AM smbd[1112]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
1/13/15 11:38:04.975 AM smbd[1112]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
1/13/15 11:38:04.975 AM smbd[1112]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
1/13/15 11:38:05.124 AM smbd[1112]: File system does not support 0X40000, file attrs
1/13/15 11:38:05.124 AM smbd[1112]: File system does not support 0X0 time attrs
1/13/15 11:38:05.124 AM smbd[1112]: File system does not support 0X0, size attrs
Believe they are related to random disconnects from the file server (10.9.5).

File Size capped at 32bit for File System Data soruce?

I have a report that uses the "File System Data" source. I am using it to find files older then 30 days of type BAK or TRAN. That all works well but the "File Size" field does not display the correct information. For example I have a file that is 191GB or 205,192,528,384 Bytes, but the report displays it as 4,294,967,295 this corresponds with the max for a 32bit INT. Can anyone confirm that this is a limitation of the driver? Is there are 64bit CRDB_FILESYSTEM.DLL?
Regards

Hi Thomas
What version of CR are you using? Please look for the version in the Help | About screen of the designer.
- Ludek
Senior Support Engineer AGS Product Support, Global Support Center Canada
Follow me on
Twitter

File System I/O sizes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for