File table overflow

Hi ,
I am experiencing an issue.One application is running on Solaris which gets the files from another ftp host.
Now i am getting one alert of content **File table overflow.**.But the files are successfully ftp'd.
Can anybody suggest what could be the reason..
Thanks in advance
Regards
Siti

It looks like the file table that manages your server socket connections is full. You could always get around this by implementing your own subclass of ServerSocket

Similar Messages

Lock table Overflow as the file size is 50 MB BW side.

Hello Everyone,
I have a XML idoc file as input which is usually more then 50MB in size.
Usually, i am getting Lock table overflow at Receiver BW side . This error is pointing to Inbound_Asynchronous_Idoc.
i have tried dividing the Input XML idoc file into small group by handling them in chunk mode of sender communication channel.
However, since its TRFC , so if it gets processed in PI but at outbound if there is an Lock table overflow error, then it fails.
I have tried to process the 50 MB of file in parts by processing 5 MB at one point of time. but does this mean that BW also process data in parts or it gets entire 50 MB to process at one stretch.
Since the input is IDOC XML so i was not able to make use of Record Set per message. so i am making use of chunk mode.
AM i doing correctly ?
Regards,
Ravi

Hi Ravikanth,
If i make use of the below logic as mentioned in the link that you provided, then do i have to remove the chunk mode from communication channel .?
Secondly, mine is a SLSFCT idoc XSD that i am using here as source and target as well.
The hirearchy becomes like this after implementing the logic mentioned in link:
Messages
Message1
Z1ZBSD_SLSFCT01
IDOC
BEGIN
EDI_DC40
For Messages and MEssages1 there is no mapping at target side.
For Z1ZBSD_SLSFCT01 its 1..1 in source and 0..unbounded in target.
For IDOC its mapped to constant and Begin to constant with value 1 .
And then EDIDC to source and target are mapped to each other with occurrence of 1..1.
Is there some thing wrong that i am doing . because after this again the files are not getting divided
Regards

File to Idoc error:"Lock table overflow"

When I post 3000 records I see 3000 idocs generated in ECC successfully, when I try to post 4000 idocs I get an error in PI "Lock table overflow" in SM58, please help
Thanks

Hi.
The error could be due to following:
1. small size of lock table
2. a particular program sets a large no of locks
3. an update process hangs hence setting a large number of locks
please check below thread.
Lock table overflow
Also check below link frm help.sap.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/d3/43d2416d9c1c7be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak.
Edited by: Deepak Shah on Feb 8, 2011 4:48 AM

IDOC Receiver Adapter, getting Lock Table Overflow to CRM System

Hello SDN!!!
This scenario is for PI to process a file and send to CRM via IDOC. The IDOCu2019s are only being created and not processed until later.
Problem: I am getting a Lock Table Overflow error in method IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS via sm58 in PI which points to the CRM box.
I have been searching many forums and every solution seems to indicate increasing the lock table, the problem with that solution is we are currently trying to create (not process yet) 80000 IDOCu2019s. This would allocate too much for the lock table.
So my question is this, Shouldnu2019t the lock be released when the IDOC gets created or none the less when a packet of IDOCu2019s via content management (breaking up the file in 1000 increments) finish. The lock table in CRM keeps increasing until all rows from the file, sent via IDOC adapter in 80 messages with 1000 IDOCu2019s per messagein the table are complete (80 separate messages in sxmb_moni).
Background:
IDOC was imported, changed to include unbounded and reimported.
Content Management breaks the file into 80 different segments, thus creating 80 distinct mappings with distinct MessageIdu2019s.
80 IDOC packets are sent to CRM, via IDOC adapter and sm58.
TCODE sm12 in CRM shows the table to keep growing and locks not released until full message is complete.
Any help would be appreciated
Cheers
Devlin

The only way to process the IDOCs in this case is by increasing the "enque/table_size" parameter in order to create the required IDOCs. You can increase the value for this parameter up to 102400 (beyond that can cause performance issues). Since you need to handle 80000, this shouldn't be an issue.
Please refer to the notes below for more information about the lock queue overflow and management.
[Note 552289 - FAQ: R/3 Lock management|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1wdCZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=552289]
[Note 13907 - System error in the block handler, overflow lock table|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1wdCZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=13907]

802.1x partial authentication and Association Table Overflows

We're rolling out 5508's/3600's/ISE's/MSE's, using existing NCS's. using dot1x (machine certs EAP/TLS MS laptops) on one SSID, 2 x other SSID's have open auth.
MSE is flagging Association Table Overflows on loads of WAPS, reseller TAC case tells me its .1x and misconfigured clients
half authing causing this (not uncommon problem apparently), however my desktop support colleagues ideally need at least a mac
address to identify a misconfigured device (if not more)
Been debugging dot1x on the 5508's and looking at MSE/WAP forensic wireshark files created on the Association Table overflow rule, but nothing leaps out immediately for the offending devices
What would be the quickest way to individually identify these devices that are filling the WAP association tables ??
(Can specific WAP Association tables be viewed with controller based WAPS's ???? )
Anyone solved similar ??
thanks
Martyn

Solution
After some too-ing- and fro-ing with TAC eventually got an answer of
"As it can be false positive in our case."
rgds

Lock table overflow problem in transaction sm58

Hi ,
I have a file to idoc scenario.I am on xi 7.0 sp09.
I am posting about 10000 records at one time in a 1 mb file.
In idx5 i am able to idocs .
However in transaction SM58 I am seeing Lock table overflow error .
Regards ,
Deepak

Deepak,
Here you can solve the problem in two ways
1) increase the size of the lock table via parameter
enque/table_size
2) or increase the enque work processes from 1 to 2 or 3
via parameter rdisp/wp_no_enq
Please have a look on SAP Note: 928044.
---Satish

Firefox lets table overflow instead of breaking words at soft hyphens

On http://www.idea.int/vt/country_view.cfm?id=2 , the table overflows into the right column because of long table headings. I inserted soft hyphens into them to help the browsers break the headings when needed. This seems to work in IE 8 and Google Chrome but not in Firefox.

Yeah, same thing on my end. It seems like it's a difference of attitude in terms of implementing the standards. You should file a bug at [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org bugzilla] and let the devs know about this. See if it hasn't been file already. Remember that bugzilla is for bug work, not discussions or complaints.

RV325 System Log Entries - Kernel - kernel: The MAC table overflow. (Neighbour table overflow.)

Hello,
I have a RV325 Router. Entries in the System Log are repeated over and over.
The messages are:
2015-01-20, 04:11:59
Kernel
kernel: The MAC table overflow. (Neighbour table overflow.)
2015-01-20, 04:11:59
Kernel
last message repeated 8 times
2015-01-20, 05:52:19
Kernel
kernel: The MAC table overflow. (Neighbour table overflow.)
Packet traces point to thousands of ARP packets coming from the ISP to my WAN port. Most of the ARP packet sources/destinations are not even close to my ISP DHCP assigned IP.

Hi, Mark.
I'm not an Apache guru, but you may have two different issues here, depending on when the
kernel[0]: file: table is full
message is time-stamped relative to when you issue the
sudo apachectl start command.
1. Looking at the results of this Google search and some others tends to indicate that common causes for httpd could not be started are errors in the /etc/httpd/httpd.conf file.
You might also want to take a look at some of these other Discussions threads and in these "Networking and the Web" Discussion threads.
2. One explanation I've found for kernel[0]: file: table is full is here.
Hope these ideas help.
Good luck!
Dr. Smoke
Author: Troubleshooting Mac® OS X

SPS224G4 IGMP-TABLE -OVERFLOW

Hello,
I have an issue with using IGMP snooping on SPS224G4.
After some period of using I get such message in log:
%BRG_IGMP-W-TABLE_OVERFLOW: IGMP group table overflow
After a little time after event the switch became uncontrollable.
Normal functionality returns only after hard reboot.
On the switches we use MVR and the static multicast groups are configured on them.
Update to the latest firmware version (1.0.6) has not solved the problem.
If it will be necessity, I can attach configuration file.
Will be glad for any help in solving the problem.

Hi As this is the BASIS problem as your BASIS person to increase enque/table_size in server. Then it may fix your problem.
thanks,
madhu

Concurrent Request 를 처리하는 File과 Tables

제품 : AOL
작성날짜 : 2003-12-02
Concurrent Request 를 처리하는 File과 Tables
=================================================
PURPOSE
이 Note는 Concurrent Reqeust output & Log 의 저장위치와 DB내 저장되는
Object들에 대한 설명입니다. Purge Concurrent Request and Output을 실행할때 다음 table들의 해당 record들이 삭제됩니다.
Explanations
- FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS
This table contains a complete history of all concurrent requests and
stores information about all submitted jobs(requested directly or by a
report set) within applications.
There's one request_id for each requested job in this tables.
- FND_RUN_REQUESTS
When a user submits a report set, this table stores information about the
reports in the report set and the parameter values for each report.
Stores information about all request sets submittted within applications.
Columns parent_request_id and request_id reflect the job# for the
report-set and the jobs it calls to.
- FND_CONC_REQUEST_ARGUMENTS
This table records arguments passed by the concurrent manager to each program
it starts running.
FND_DUAL
This table records when requests do not update database tables.
FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES
This table records information about Oracle Applications and operating system
processes.
FND_CONC_STAT_LIST
This table collects runtime performance statistics for concurrent requests.
FND_CONC_STAT_SUMMARY
This table contains the concurrent program performance statistics generated by
the Purge Concurrent Request and/or Manager Data program.
The Purge Concurrent Request and/or Manager Data program uses the data in
FND_CONC_STAT_LIST to compute these statistics.
FND_CONC_PP_ACTIONS
Stores the post request processing actions(e.g., print, notify) for each
submitted request. There's a concurrent_request_id here for each request_id
in the FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS.
FND_RUN_REQ_PP_ACTIONS
Stores the post request processing actions(e.g., print, notify) for
submitted request set programs that are stored in FND_RUN_REQUESTS.
Reference Documents
Note 132823.1

I created four (4) similar two (2) page file tables as an inventory of the contents of four (4) file crates full of LP vinyl record albums. How can these four (4) files be merged into a single file, then arranged in alphabetical order (by artist)?

I am using "pages" version 5.5 (2109) as updated in its newest version after installing Yosemite OS X 10.10 on my 21.5 inch Mac desktop computer. When I printing the second file as a two sided document on a single sheet of paper, it only printed the first side. I looked at the copy of the file on my screen, and saw that the second page was also blank on my screen. I opened the original locked version of the 68 row, 4 column table, and found that both pages, 34 rows on each page, were intact, but when I saved it again, locked it, and reopened a duplicate copy, the second page again was not there. I ended up printing a copy of the original file, but I am nit able to save more than one page of the two page original. I would like to do this so I can edit the list without altering the original. I would eventually like to merge all four tables into one document, than arrange the entire merged file in alphabetical order. I would like to do this and have not been able to. This was the original question I had before I lost the second page of the second file table.

In general theory, one now has the Edit button for their posts, until someone/anyone Replies to it. I've had Edit available for weeks, as opposed to the old forum's ~ 30 mins.
That, however, is in theory. I've posted, and immediately seen something that needed editing, only to find NO Replies, yet the Edit button is no longer available, only seconds later. Still, in that same thread, I'd have the Edit button from older posts, to which there had also been no Replies even after several days/weeks. Found one that had to be over a month old, and Edit was still there.
Do not know the why/how of this behavior. At first, I thought that maybe there WAS a Reply, that "ate" my Edit button, but had not Refreshed on my screen. Refresh still showed no Replies, just no Edit either. In those cases, I just Reply and mention the [Edit].
Also, it seems that the buttons get very scrambled at times, and Refresh does not always clear that up. I end up clicking where I "think" the right button should be and hope for the best. Seems that when the buttons do bunch up they can appear at random around the page, often three atop one another, and maybe one way the heck out in left-field.
While I'm on a role, it would be nice to be able to switch between Flattened and Threaded Views on the fly. Each has a use, and having to go to Options and then come back down to the thread is a very slow process. Jive is probably incapable of this, but I can dream.
Hunt

Corrupted Master File Table on External Hard-Drive(NTFS)

You could try some data recover software, it should be able to copy the data off for you (as long as there are no physical problems with the HD). Recuva is free, Rstudio is also very good. You will need to have enough space available on another drive to restore the data to.
Best of luck with it! :)

First off I want to apologize if I sound inexperienced, this is my first time posting on Spiceworks and I have only been in IT for a year as an intern.So here is my problem, I have an external hard-drive that I use as a secondary drive for storage. The other day I went to get something off it when I noticed that I could not access the drive through file explorer. It came up with an error saying "Data error (cycle redundancy check).".
I proceeded to google the problem since I have not seen the error before and found many forums telling me to run a check disk on the drive with /f to fix the errors on the disk. I run the chkdsk and I get the following error"Corrupt master file table. Windows will attempt to recover master file table from disk. Windows cannot recover master file table. CHKDSK aborted".
I then booted my machine into a...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Internal table overflow

Hi All,
In an enhancement, I have to look-up a R/3 table.
For this I wrote select query and getting data into internal table.
Here, when executing select query, a runtime error occurred saying that internal table overflow is happening...because of huge data...
How to overcome, this overflow.. with out increasing the size of internal table ?

Hi,
make also sure to define and select only the fields you need in your internal table.
Don't use
DATA: it_mat TYPE TABLE OF mara.
if you need only MATNR, MTART and MATKL (just for example).
Regards,
Klaus

Lock table overflow 1 & Error 7 when sending an IDoc

dear all,
we r getting error in purchasing cube for itm datasource
2lis_o2_itm for delta...
1.Lock table overflow 1
2.Error 7 when sending an IDoc
3.Errors in source system
when i check in details it is showing :
Data Package 1 : arrived in BW ; Processing : Selected number does not agree with transferred n
its daily delta..plz give me solution its urgent....
at request in manage...we got some records...wat shud the process..
Thanks in adv
pinky reddy
Edited by: pinky reddy on Apr 8, 2008 7:42 AM

solved

Error " RFC Status :- Lock table overflow "in event trace ( SWEL )

Hi experts ,
I will not mention this post as URGENT but you guys can understand the importance as I am in PRD Support of my workflows .
My Workflow is throughing error in SWEL , as below   and after error its getting deactivated .
The workflow is triigering based on the BO : DRAW and event CREATED .
Error : RFC Status           Lock table overflow
In feedback after error the message is : A system error has occurred in lock management .
I have resolved the deactivation problem after error , but   can any body please suggest me what is the root cause of this error , so that i can try to avoid that error .
Regards
Prabhudutta
Edited by: Prabhudutta Behera on Nov 20, 2008 5:58 AM

This error I have not faced. i will suggest you to check SWU3 transaction Code and check everything is configured. Also check SM12 and SM58. Also I will ask you to contact the Basis Guys related to this issue. Also check WF-BATCH is having all the authorization required. Try to replicate this from the system where Workflow is working.
Thanks
Arghadip

File table overflow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for