Files system - access problem (JSR 75)

Hi All
My cell phone is Nokia 6288, I'm from Israel.
The phone should support JSR 75 (FileConnection and PIM API), and I get it without it.
Probably, my Cell operator decided to remove the built-in support for JSR-75 (which suppose to be there).
I wonder how can I add or restore the java thing for JSR-75 (if is it possible).
or if there is someway to get it back because
I know that Nokia 6288 should include the JSR 75 support.
How can I be sure that it have be removed?
Because many application which need this JSR 75 support
couldn't find files and not work because of that.
Thanks,
Adi

25-Jul-2008 10:33 AM
burekas wrote:
I know there is maybe a special burning which should get it back.
It is not permitted to discuss such operations on this forum.
Was this post helpful? If so, please click on the white "Kudos!" star below. Thank you!

Similar Messages

  • Direct File System access problems from JAWS application

    Hello,
    I have built a Web Start application that consists of a Webserver (Jetty) ,
    a WAR file and a Java (main) class that deploys the web application on
    the server and starts the server. It all works fine, apart from the fact
    that I am getting java.security.AccessControlExceptions when I try to
    access the local filesystem or system variables like the java.io.tmpdir.
    I have signed all the jar files and I included the<security> <allpermissions />
    </security> tag in the jnlp file. Still, I can't seem to get out
    of the sandbox.
    I have read in this article (http://mindprod.com/jgloss/javawebstart.html)
    that direct file system access from a Web Start application is impossible
    (Quote: "There is still no way for even a signed JAWS app to
    find some persistent disk space in an easy way. It pretty well
    has to ask the user for the name of some directory to use.")
    Is this true?
    Thank you,
    Peter

    Hi Guys,
    I found a way to access the local filesystem...
    Besides signing all the jar files and including the<security><allpermissions /></security> tag in the jnlp file I have to include this line in the code I execute on the client machine:
    System.setSecurityManager(null);
    Regards,
    Peter

  • SAP File System Access - SLD Naming Convention/Suggestions

    I would like to access our ECC file system to pick up files we will use to create Idocs.   
    I'm wondering the best way to describe the file system access in the SLD.   
    I have a business system for the main client on the ECC  system (BS_ED1CLNT010) for example but the OS isn't client specific.    I could use this as the Business System in the scenario and define a file adapter that connects to the unix server.
    Any thoughts?

    Maybe I didn't frame my question properly.  
    In the ECC system we have multiple clients (20,30,40, etc).  If I am going to post an Idoc to a client in this system I need to define each as a business system in the SLD and import this to the Integration Directory.    So I would have BS_XXXCLNT010, BS_XXXCLNT020, etc, one for each client.   These all share the same Technical System.    If I want to post an Idoc to a client on the ECC system I have to define a Business System and interface to that and every client that will receive an Idoc. (as well as the ALE settings on the ECC)
    Each of these reside on the same SAP server (sap00001 for example) and there is a directory (/public for example)  on this server.     This isn't client specific.  
    I wish to pick up a file from the ECC file system and post a client on the ECC system (maybe different ones based on the data in the file).   
    I don't want to define the file adapter under BS_XXXCLNT020 since it isn't specifc to client 020 although that would work.  
    Do I create a new TS in the SLD as third party, stand alone java, and a BS for that?    TS_XXX_FILESYSTE (3rd party).  BS_XXX_FILESYSTEM for the TS?
    I'm really looking for clarity in the definition of the SLD.

  • Whether will falsh player support  Unrestricted File System Access in Full Trust ?if it will , when?

        I am doing a software based on Flash , to provide my customer to edit pictures online.
        In some scenario, to get Full Acess Local File is necessary. I find SliverLight 5.0 had supported such features:
    Unrestricted File System Access in Full Trust
    Full Trust in-browser for enterprise scenarios
    Default Filename in SaveFileDialog and OpenFileDialog
       I really desire those features , so , I am wondering whether adobe will support it .If will, when?

    Please read the below flash player administrator guide
    http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/flashplayer/pdfs/flas h_player_11_7_admin_guide.pdf
    check the section "The User FlashPlayerTrust directory". It will help.

  • Ext3fs file system access on Sparc SCSI disk

    We've got a requirement to read data from a SCSI disk with an ext3fs file system which will be connected to a SunBlade system. Write capability would be a bonus.
    We've found some old (and not working) implementations to allow Solaris to mount and read ext2, but these don't work on Sparc. Things like LTools won't work either, since Solaris won't allow access to a SCSI disk that doesn't have a Solaris label on it.
    Does anyone know of any possible solutions to this problem? Any one know of ext3fs for Solaris? Any one know how to access an internal SCSI disk on Sparc that doesn't have a Solaris label on it?
    Thanks
    Ed

    Hmmmmmm........Thanks for the suggestions - have written a test and the results arent good.
    Using file filter to "find" the file is just too slow (1.4 secs and i need to do this 4million times for my application).
    So I understand why the filter is slow compared to directly naming the file as we have to accept/reject them all, whereas if we know the file we can go straight to it. But this is a nightmare for my app. Looks like Im going to have to think again....
      public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        String dir = "/path/files";
        File dirf = new File(dir);
        long l = System.currentTimeMillis();
        File f1 = new File(dirf,"TheRealFile.3253.ser"); // The file in the 30,000 we want
        InputStream i = new FileInputStream(f1);
        System.err.println("--> "+i.read());
        i.close();
        System.err.println("Took: "+(System.currentTimeMillis()-l)+" ms");
        // Test 2
        FileFilter ffx = new FileFilter() {
          public boolean accept(File s) {
            return s.isFile() &&
                   s.getName().startsWith("TheRealFile")
                   && s.getName().endsWith(".ser");
        l = System.currentTimeMillis();
        File [] f2 = dirf.listFiles(ffx);
        //System.err.println("Found: "+f2[0]);
        InputStream i2 = new FileInputStream(f2[0]);
        System.err.println("--> "+i2.read());
        i2.close();
        System.err.println("Took: "+(System.currentTimeMillis()-l)+" ms");
    --> 172
    Took: 0 ms
    --> 172
    Took: 1482 ms

  • Disallow for file system access

    Hi All,
    I would like to not permit to access to file system, how can i do that with permission object. I saw only examples how to set contraints on location where it can access.
    Regards

    I'm sorry but i dont understand the problem. (Maybe someone else will)
    So you have told me that when you pass null to an file permission object, that you find out the mask is "NONE"?
    You want to stop users accessing some files?
    You need to build code that will stop the user accessing certain files
    You want to know if you can put restrictions on the whole VM(What is VM?) or just the context?
    I believe this Link could be helpful for you.

  • What is the minimum file system access needed to run ODI 10.1.3.4.0 client?

    Hi ODI discussion folks,
    I have a couple of questions from an Oracle partner that I'm trying to find a definitive answer for if possible. The partner is setting up ODI 10.1.3.4.0 for a customer who insists that the absolute minimum amount of access to the file system is granted due to corporate security policies.
    I have checked the bundled ODI documentation but couldn't really find anything about file system permissions needed to run the ODI client. I was pointed towards the "Setting Up Security for an Integration Project — What to Consider" document but this does not mention a great deal about how much access to the file system is needed for the ODI client to function.
    What the partner is asking is the following:
    "1. What are the minimum file/folder permissions needed for the ODI client installation? I'm installing at xxxxx
    and their machines have to be locked down as much as possible.
    2. Say you have 3 users all wanting to run integrations etc and the Master and Work
    repositories have been set up. An admin installs the ODI client but doesn't
    create the connection to the Master repository. What are the minimum
    file/folder permissions required on the client machine to:
    a) create the connection to the repository
    b) run any subsequent integrations?"
    If anyone can advise on this then that would be much appreciated.
    Regards
    Craig Huggans
    Oracle Hyperion Support
    Message was edited by:
    user648991

    Hi Craig,
    How are you?
    Let me try to contribute a little....
    1) The minimum requirement is for its own installation directory, there is no reason to have access to other directories unless if it is necessary to read files from some other directory at the client
    2) Again only to its own install directory. The connection setting is recorded at \bin install directory. After that, all information are recorded at repository, there is no client work.
    Be free to contact me by email or phone if you have any new doubt. You can get my email from my profile.
    Does it respond your doubts?
    Cezar Santos

  • Read only file system and Problems witth pacman -S

    Hi im a newbie at Arch, and i have 2 problems...
    1) When I log in as a root user i can't modify any of the configuration files cause i only have a " Read only file System" does anyone know how  I can  change this cause im sick of using my live cd to modify the files i need to change..
    2) I have problems with pacman -S it says " Unable to lock database if you're sure pacman is not already running you can remove /tmp/pacman.lck"
    when i do rm /tmp/pacman.lck it says that it can't be done cause the file doesn't exist.. and Im sure that my dhcp and dns is working fine... (just in case of any wonder)
    Well if someone could help me i really would appreciate it
    thanks

    # <file>      <dir>           <type>     <options>           <dump>      <pass>
    none                 /dev/pts        devpts     defaults               0          0
    none                 /dev/shm        tmpfs      defaults           0          0
    /dev/cdrom           /mnt/cd          iso9660   ro,user,noauto,unhide  0          0
    /dev/dvd             /mnt/dvd         udf       ro,user,noauto,unhide  0          0
    /dev/fd0         /mnt/fl          vflat     user,noauto            0          0   
    /dev/hda6          swap            swap      default                0          0
    /dev/hda5/            ext3        defaults      0  0
    /dev/hda7/mnt/windows vfat  rw,usev,auto,umask = 000 0 0
    fsck -fC /dev/hda5 didnt work it said... "Error while executing fsck.ext3 for /dev/hda5

  • Motorola file system access

    hi,
    I wrote a Midlet to access image files on my motorola v3x.I also checked it by Device Emulator .It is working fine.But when i installed in my phone it is not worked.So,if any body worked on this please help me.
    sorry for my bad english.thanks in advance

    We have to start it from begining ..
    Does the device supports full implementation of JSR75. MOTO devices dont support complete implementations. like RAZRv3 i claims to support JSR75 but doesnt supports complete implementation.
    A. Check Call to System.getProperty with key microedition.io.file.FileConnection.version
    should return the implementation version number starting with 1.0
    B.Files read/write permissions should be supported by the device�s native system:
    � javax.microedition.io.Connector.file.read - should enable reading from the file
    system (hereinafter just �read permission�).
    � javax.microedition.io.Connector.file.write - should enable writing to the file
    system (hereinafter just �write permission�).
    If A and B are true ..u can start with below points.
    If it supports the complete implementation, then
    1. is it able to install properly.
    2. Have u specified permissions in the JAD file for the same?
    3. at what stage is it not working, when the file write code is being executed ??
    Message was edited by:
    aeran1

  • File drag and drop from java app to file system - Linux problem

    Hi all,
    I am developing an application for files archiving, with a graphical user interface. The files are showed in a JList, and I implemented drag and drop feature for it. It works well for Windows platform, but not at all for Linux (Ubuntu).
    Under Linux, file export with DND from the archive to file system does not work.
    To extract a file with DND, we can't know the target destination folder, so I create a temp file (file extracted from the archive is wrote to OS tmp dir), and the system is expected to handle the DND action.
    The temp file is correctly created (original data is well retrieved), but Ubuntu does not want to copy or move it via DND.
    I get a system dialog window (while extracting file "test1") :
    Error while moving
    There was an error getting information about "[tmp/60lp1t7egl/test1]".
    Show more details > Operation not supported
    (Cancel, Skip all, Skip, Retry)
    Can it be a rights problem ?
    Any idea ?
    Regards,
    Biibox

    Until the 3rd party image editor developers provide us with the Photos extensions for using their app from within Photo we'll have to export to the Desktop, edit there in the apps and either import the new file into Photos or use it elsewhere.

  • File System Repository problem

    Hello guys,
    I'm on:
    J2EE Engine 6.40 PatchLevel 98256.313
    Portal 6.0.14.0.0
    KnowledgeManagementCollaboration 6.0.14.4.0 (NW04 SPS14 Patch 4)
    running on a Windows machine.
    I'm trying to set up a File System Repository to connect to a remote share on another Windows machine. I followed the documentation and also some hints here from SDN and still can't connect to the share.
    In component monitor it says:
    Startup Error:  The localroot does not exist:
    10.80.1.55\Test_portal
    In a trace log I'm getting this:
    #1.5#000BCD3F823F00260000000800000AB000040D879131A728#1140775814806#com.sapportals.wcm.service.fsmount.FSMountService#sap.com/irj#com.sapportals.wcm.service.fsmount.FSMountService#Guest#59####3a9c7e20a51d11da928e000bcd3f823f#Thread[ConfigurationEventDispatcher,5,SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_Group]##0#0#Error##Plain###Error mounting drive ,path
    10.80.1.55
    Test_portal#
    #1.5#000BCD3F823F00260000000900000AB000040D879131ABAB#1140775814806#com.sapportals.wcm.service.fsmount.FSMountService#sap.com/irj#com.sapportals.wcm.service.fsmount.FSMountService#Guest#59####3a9c7e20a51d11da928e000bcd3f823f#Thread[ConfigurationEventDispatcher,5,SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_Group]##0#0#Warning##Plain###FSMountService Reconfiguration (New path) failed to mount network path
    pr1141
    Test_portal - com.sapportals.wcm.service.fsmount.RemoteAccessException:  Network component not started:
    10.80.1.55
    Test_portal
         at com.sapportals.wcm.service.fsmount.FSMountService.mountDrive(FSMountService.java:90)
         at com.sapportals.wcm.service.fsmount.FSMountService.updateConfigurables(FSMountService.java:349)
         at com.sapportals.wcm.service.fsmount.FSMountService.reconfigure(FSMountService.java:287)
         at com.sapportals.wcm.crt.CrtThreadSafeComponentHandler.tryToReconfigure(CrtThreadSafeComponentHandler.java:297)
         at com.sapportals.wcm.crt.CrtThreadSafeComponentHandler.handleReconfigure(CrtThreadSafeComponentHandler.java:147)
         at com.sapportals.wcm.crt.CrtComponentManager.reconfigureComponent(CrtComponentManager.java:343)
         at com.sapportals.wcm.crt.CrtConfigurationEventListener.notifyComponentConfigChanged(CrtConfigurationEventListener.java:79)
         at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.runtime.CmConfigurationProvider.sendChangeEvent(CmConfigurationProvider.java:1288)
         at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.runtime.CmConfigurationProvider.sendChangeEventOrRestart(CmConfigurationProvider.java:1237)
         at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.runtime.CmConfigurationProvider.configEvent(CmConfigurationProvider.java:256)
         at com.sapportals.config.event.ConfigEventService.dispatchEvent(ConfigEventService.java:210)
         at com.sapportals.config.event.ConfigEventService.configEvent(ConfigEventService.java:98)
         at com.sapportals.config.event.ConfigEventDispatcher.callConfigListeners(ConfigEventDispatcher.java:299)
         at com.sapportals.config.event.ConfigEventDispatcher.flushEvents(ConfigEventDispatcher.java:248)
         at com.sapportals.config.event.ConfigEventDispatcher.run(ConfigEventDispatcher.java:105)
    I had an idea that it could be because of the Serverlet Engine User, which is set up due to documentation, but is only a local user not a domain user. I don't know to which extent this user is important for FS Mount Service. I thought, that for connecting to a remote share, there is only important the user and password set up in Network Path settings in CM.
    Changing the user on which is EP running is quite a difficult step due to our security policies and so on. So I would rather not experiment with this until I try all the other possibilities.
    Could you, please, give me some advice?

    Hi Jiri,
    have you used double forward slashes in your network path? Please try: //10.80.1.55/Test_portal
    You can also test from the portal machine that you can mount the drive via command shell:
    "net use t:
    10.80.1.55\Test_portal /user:DOMAIN\USER"
    (make sure you specify the user with domain)
    Hope this helps,
    Robert

  • File Manager access problem

    So I am really confused on this subject...
    I have the Creative Cloud subscription, therefore I have a webBasics site. It says on the Business Catalyst pricing page that with the webBasics package it comes with access to the file manager... But when I login to my Admin Console I cant find the file manager anywhere. Why is this? Is there something I am not seeing?

    With that how Muse works, while it has been updated to be better it basically handles the files. Allowing managing files on the admin side can cause conflicts when you do changes in Muse. So it is disabled by default.
    I think the option to turn it on is under site settings somewhere, I forget where as we are full partners and do not use Muse.

  • Search event logs for file system access

    I'm looking to create a script that will allow me to search Windows 2012 security event logs for access to specific folders.  Ideally it would allow the granularity to search for read access events (4663) and specify specific users to view.  One
    example would be to show events for drive F:\ where the folder name is JSmith (including subfolders) and the username is not JSmith.
    I've tried something like this, but can't see how to filter.
    Get-EventLog security | ? {$_.Message.contains("F:\JSmith")}

    Is the match explicit?  How can I use wildcard?  How can I exclude events?
    I recommend asking a search engine and doing some initial research. Here's a starter:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh849682.aspx
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/powershell/archive/2009/06/11/windows-event-log-in-powershell-part-ii.aspx
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/ashleymcglone/archive/2013/08/28/powershell-get-winevent-xml-madness-getting-details-from-event-logs.aspx
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/heyscriptingguy/archive/2011/01/24/use-powershell-cmdlet-to-filter-event-log-for-easy-parsing.aspx
    https://richardspowershellblog.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/get-winevent/
    Don't retire TechNet! -
    (Don't give up yet - 13,225+ strong and growing)

  • How to access file system in  kernel?

    hi
    i need to access disk file system in kernel.
    is it possible using UFS data structure and function in
    other modules in kernel?
    or i need to create file system access function based on DDI/DKI?

    Short answer is "you cannot".
    The longer one is "see topics in this forum" - there was an exhaustive discussion about this issue...
    The thead "File I/O from withing a driver" in Driver Development forum may be of particular interest.
    Hope this helps,
         Ilya.

  • Problem with File System Repository after release change

    Hello,
    we have been changing the Portal release from EP 6.0 to SAP NetWeaver Portal 7.0 SP17. The OS of the host is Windows 2003 Server.
    If I open the component monitor to watch the repostitories, the state of the file system repositories are red and a error message occurred:
    Startup Error:  getting mapped math - Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password
    I checked the logon credentials....they are ok. Also I checked the access from the Portalhost to the Windows File System....it´s ok too.
    In our previous portal release the FSR were ok!!
    Is there a difference between the file system repository configuration in portal 6.0 and portal 7.0?
    Thanks and regards
    Tom

    Hello Hussain,
    I have checked the username and the password of the user who have full access on the Windows file system, but the same error occurred. In the Network Path we have configured a domain user for the file system access. Here is the configuration of the network path:
    Name: Test
    Description: Test
    Networkpath:
    Host\share
    Password: ****
    Re-enter Password: ****
    User: domain\user
    Here the configuration of the repository:
    Name: Test
    Description: Test
    Prefix: /Test
    Lookup Mode: caseless
    Root Directory:
    Host\share
    Repository Services: Nothing
    Property Search Manager: com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.generic.search.SimpleManagerSearchManager
    Security Manager: AclSecurityManager
    ACL Manager Cache: ca_cm_rep_acl
    Windows Landscape System: Microsoft_Windows_KM
    Read only: unchecked
    Could it be that I need a user mapping for the access of the windows file system?
    Perhaps the configuration of the Windows Landscape System is wrong?
    regards
    Tom

Maybe you are looking for