Filing Systems

Hey everyone,
I am getting to the point where I have a lot of projects going. Some of them are just little ideas floating around, some are actual projects. I have created a fairly simple system to categorize them so that I can access them quickly now. My question to the group is this:
When you are doing multiple mixes/bouncing down multiple songs/importing exporting for mastering/anything that requires swapping of files...how do you track what is what? Do you keep all the songs incarnations in a specific folder or is there a naming system that you use and do global searches to find matches? I am toying with a bunch of different ideas so any insight would be helpful.
-mike

NAME everything.
Remember,NAME is the most important thing.You might not use PC as a Mac, they can't treat me as mikey10101....
My practise will be:~
1)Create a Folder (name as Mactreouser Album)
2)Inside the Folder with create a few folder (name as Music Arrangement,Mixing,Mastering,
for example)
3)In the Music Arrangement Folder contain all my Arrangement and Tracking projects (Song 01 ,Song
02, Song 03...)
4)Save the Mixing Project into Mixing Folder and Every Bounce from the Mixing will go into the
folder of Mixing and name the Bounced Audio as Song01.1...Song01.2...and so on...easy to
monitor/audition every Mix for the Song
5)When come to the Mastering Stage,is the same,Save every project and Bounce the Audio files into
Mastering Folder and name as above for Audition.
set up your path then you'll not confuse to your messey titled files and folder
huh..do i clear enough?haaa...sorry for the poor english.. :P
cheers

Similar Messages

  • Can anyone tell me where I can find a beginners guide to the filing system?

    Can anyone tell me where I can find a beginners guide to the filing system on the Macbook Air iOS 10.9.4?

    So, does this mean you have given up and decided to return to the MS Windows (PC) embrace?
    The link that dominic23 provided has parts 1, 2, and 3 — did you review all of these? What remaining question(s) do you have about the Apple file system?
    Videos that you may find on the Apple site are not updated regularly, and steps/techniques shown in them may be outdated, or not work as shown on the current operating system release.
    Did you look into the Apple Retail Store One to One learning assistance?
    Did you consider either of the following books as a learning aide?
    Switching to the Mac: The Missing Manual, Mavericks Edition
    OS X Mavericks: The Missing Manual

  • How to get PDF file that has been transformed into docx into my filing system so I can work on it???

    How can I get the PDF file that was transformed into a docx file into my filing system to be able to work on it and translate it as the customer requested?

    THanks for your reply.
    Well what happens is I bought the program. It gives you a button to click,
    you log in and then a box opens up asking you to select the file, I go into
    my filing system (in Windows explorer) select the file, and the program
    converts it into docx, my choice.  I can read it there and when I try to
    copy and paste it into my file where the PDF version is saved, it behaves
    like an "image", and I can't save it.... or it saves likes something you
    save on the internet, so you have to go into internet every time you want
    to see it.    I have also pressed any amount of buttons to see if it will
    give me the option to save it any other way, and have found nothing.  What
    I would need is a file in docx.format that I can edit.  People send me
    things in PDF and sometimes I can just copy it off the PDF file and save it
    in WOrd, then I can translate it for them. But sometimes the PDF file
    doesnt allow me to copy the text.  If it is in image form, I cannot work on
    it.  It means printing it, so I can copy type it into Word... and for that
    I certainly wouldnt need to buy a program.  Its just double the work and
    ends up that the job takes twice as long.!
    Sorry  if I am a bit dumb with informatics.  But I simply could not find
    any way whatever to  copy the PDF file that was transformed into Word, in a
    format that would enable me to edit it.
    Kindest regards,
    Margery
    2013/12/2 Test Screen Name <[email protected]>
        Re: How to get PDF file that has been transformed into docx into my
    filing system so I can work on it???
    created by Test Screen Name<http://forums.adobe.com/people/TestScreenName>in *Adobe
    ExportPDF* - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5890871#5890871

  • Maintaining previous filing system format within Aperture 3

    I am a new Mac user after 20 years with PC's. I bought a 2.3ghz MacBook Pro 15" with 8gb of ram and a 512 solid state drive to try to better manage a photo collection of about 100gb, including a huge set of ancestors photos from 1800 and on. I have been using a simple filing system by creating separate folders for various trips by date and place, such as 2011-03-15 USA, AZ, Phoenix. Each folder may contain photos from several dates over several weeks. I do not want to break out the photos into separate folders by each day. I want to be able to permanently modify, tag, and delete photos from the master file. I also want to be able to export the modified photos using this "date" structure.
    What is the safest and most efficient way to do this while being able to take advantage of all that AP3 has to offer?

    What TD, Allen, and Matthew said.
    There are (at least) two import dialog boxes in Aperture:
    . "File→Import" (also on the Toolbar), and
    . +"File→Import Folders as Projects".+
    You want the latter. It will allow you to retain you current filing system (and take advantage of it).
    1. "Folders and Projects" will make an Aperture Folder for every Finder folder in your tree, except the terminal folders (which should be the ones w. images in them) from which it will create Projects. (If you are not familiar with Aperture's parts, [this comment|http://discussions.apple.com/messageview.jspa?messageID=13124533&stqc=t rue] will help, as will consulting the first seven chapters of the [User Manual|http://documentation.apple.com/en/aperture/usermanual>).
    2. "In their current location" will leave your files where there are. Aperture will create a reference (a pointer) to each file. Your images in Aperture will all have Referenced Masters.
    3. "Master File Name" will assign the current file name to the images imported into your Library. You might want to take advantage of Aperture's naming prowess and start with a file naming convention (search this forum) -- but this is secondary to your current goal. If you are satisfied with the current file names, use them for your Aperture images. If you have thought about renaming them, this might be a good time to do so.
    4. My mistake (but this is whacked in Aperture). If you set this to either one of the settings that start with "Both ... ", Aperture should import all image files, regardless of format.
    By all means:
    - Back up all your current images
    - Practice on small subsets of images. Import a few folders, a few hundred images, and see what happens. Tweak your settings as needed. Delete the entire Library, and try again (since you are leaving your files where they are, deleting the Library deletes only the references (the pointers inside the Library) to those files -- it does not delete the files themselves).
    - Practice until you are sure you have it right, then do a trial run on all of your files. +You can always delete this Library as well.+
    And ask more questions. Good Luck.

  • Cross platform filing system access?

    Has anyone any experience with Paragon software (http://www.paragon-software.com/) filing system tools for osx and windows?
    I want to be able to access OSX formated USB/firewire/eSATA drives from Windows 7/64 and also need something to enable latest OSX to access NTFS formatted drives (if it cant out of the box).
    Looking for similar for accessing each others network shares as well (if thats needed - I dont know yet).
    Anything else that better?
    Thanks all

    Khazul wrote:
    Has anyone any experience with Paragon software (http://www.paragon-software.com/) filing system tools for osx and windows?
    I want to be able to access OSX formated USB/firewire/eSATA drives from Windows 7/64 and also need something to enable latest OSX to access NTFS formatted drives (if it cant out of the box).
    Looking for similar for accessing each others network shares as well (if thats needed - I dont know yet).
    Anything else that better?
    Well, I have used the free NTFS drivers for MacOS and they worked OK. They were a bit slow, but they got the job done. I have also used MedaFour's MacDrive8 on my Windows 7 (x86) systems with levels of success.
    I have recently converted to using the Paragon drivers at the recommendation of a user here with much more experience than myself. The MacOS driver for NTFS has worked flawlessly for me, although I did notice one small incident when I re-partitioned and re-formatted a drive, where for some reason it would only allow me to enter a single character for the volume label. Once the format completed, I had no problems renaming the volume, so I'm not sure what's up there. I will have to try to reproduce this to see if it is a problem with the driver, or just a one-time weird error on my system. On the Windows side, I like how the Paragon driver integrates more seamlessly into Windows and just works. MacDrive8 was OK, but it had a few small issues for me, and the Paragon tool doesn't seem to have these same limitations. In any case, be warned that installing any HFS+ Driver on Windows will probably cause our optical disk drive letter to change. There are ways to deal with this, but it can catch you off guard if you aren't expecting it...

  • Partitioning External Hard Drive- questions about software & filing system

    I just got my macbook and I want to use my older external hard drive to transfer data between the macbook and my PC desktop. I have a Maxtor OneTouch II 300gb with only one partition. I have about 80gb of data already on the Maxtor. So my two questions are . .
    1. What is the best software (prefer freeware) to partition my Maxtor and keep the data I already have on it? Or is there a better way?
    2. What is the best setup for the filing system for the partitions? NTFS for one and FAT32 for the other or something else? I want to be able to both read & write to the Maxtor from both the PC and Mac. Appreciate any help anyone can throw my way.
    Macbook- Black model   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    I'm not quite sure of what you mean by:
    I would like to avoid
    moving all the stuff from the external drive to the
    mac, and then having to move it all back onto the
    external drive.
    But most external drive was formated using fat 32 which theoretically limit to 2 TB and file size limit to 4 GB. Just put a useless file from your pc, and connect your external to your MacBook ,and see if you can copy and or delete that file from your Mac.
    You can also check your HD format on PC side by: go to my computer, right click the external HD icon and select properties, and it will shows you the hd was formatted with,...
    If you mean you want to format to mac format "on the fly", they might be some utilities for that on Mac side, but I'm not aware of, but why you want to re-format it if the external work for both sides without getting new format, since format that using MAc extended journaled wight result unreadable on your PC side.
    Good Luck

  • Filing system: events, projects, backups

    As far as I know Final Cut Pro X should create two new folders within the foulder films: Final Cut Events und Final Cut Projects.
    I can‘t find these folders. Instead there is a folder Final Cut Backups with hundreds of files and more than 800 GB data. Each new file is bigger than the previous one. They seem to copy their predecessors and add new material.
    I am afraid that‘s not the way it should be ... 
    How can I restore a proper filing system ?

    TThis information
    As far as I know Final Cut Pro X should create two new folders within the foulder films: Final Cut Events und Final Cut Projects.
    is is about obsolete versions of FCP.

  • I need version 3. 6.18 back as version 4 is not compatible with the electronic filing system of the U. S. Bankrutpcy Court.

    I'm copying the message I received from the U. S. Bankruptcy Court:
    ECF users are advised NOT TO UPGRADE to version 4.x or 5.x of the Firefox browser.
    The Firefox browser versions 4.x and 5.x are not fully compatible with the court's ECF system. Several issues involving electronic filing have been reported. Furthermore, the "View Labels" button from the Creditor Mailing Matrix is not functional when using the upgrade. The recommended version of Firefox for use with ECF is 3.6.18, and the recommended version of Internet Explorer is either 7.x or 8.x.
    If you have any questions, please contact the ECF Help Desk at 503-326-1510, 541-431-4005 or 866-777-0442.
    I need to get version 3.6.18 back.

    To downgrade to Firefox 3.6 first uninstall Firefox 4, but do not select the option to "Remove my Firefox personal data". If you select that option it will delete your bookmarks, passwords and other user data.
    You can then install the latest version of Firefox 3.6 available from http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html - it will automatically use your current bookmarks, passwords etc.
    To avoid possible problems with downgrading, I recommend going to your profile folder and deleting the following files if they exist - extensions.cache, extensions.rdf, extensions.ini, extensions.sqlite and localstore.rdf. Deleting these files will force Firefox to rebuild the list of installed extensions, checking their compatibility, and reset toolbar customizations.
    For details of how to find your profile folder see https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Profiles
    3.6.17 is the latest release version, 3.6.18 is due out on June 21st.

  • Filing System

    Hello Everyone,
    Our current filing structure has multiple mapped drives on each workstation. The issue is that we are about three companies in one. A few employees are complaining that the mapped drives are very disorganized and that it's hard to know where to save a file
    because there are so many mapped drives for three businesses.
    We currently are using Windows Server 2012 r2 and all workstations are windows 7.
    My question is this. Is there any way to organize the way mapped drives appear on workstations? 
    For example:
    Business 1:
     Drive 1
     Drive 2
     Drive 3
    Business 2:
     Drive 1
     Drive 2
     Drive 3
    Business 3:
     Drive 1
     Drive 2
     Drive 3
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi,
    It seems that DFS (Distribution File System) is the solution of your current situation.
    DFS could help creating a namespace like \\domain.com\root, with different folders which actually point to share folders on different servers.
    The first picture of following article could explain the structure:
    Overview of DFS Namespaces
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc730736.aspx
    You do not need to enable DFS replication - only DFS namespace is enough. Your folders will then work like this:
    \\domain.com\root
    \share1 --- point to \\server1\share1
    \share2 --- point to \\server2\share2
    \share3 --- point to \\server2\share3
    However you may need to reorganize your shares first to may the structure clear and easy to be linked with DFS namespace folders.
    Users just need to map \\domain.com\root then all folders will be displayed inside.
    And another workaround is to just create "shortcuts" on a "root server" which point to another server share with \\server\share - when accessing \\rootserver\share, users will see many shortcuts which actually pointing to a different
    share folder.

  • Setting up PDF filing system - file size woes

    We are using Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro to scan our hard copy filing into the system. I have sussed out how we are going to do it, and build an index etc. What I am a little confused about is how big I should expect these documents to be. If I scan a single letter in, using Grey Scale (which I think looks better than black and white), the document comes out at about 450Kb. If I then optomise it, it almost halfs in size. However, if I adjust the settings on the grey scall preset to get it to scan at about 200Kb, the quality is quite bad.
    Can anyone advise me on the best way, to scan documents that we want to have soft copy, and be able to print off if required. We don't need them to look like they are originals, but dont want them to look like they have been copied in a fax machine.
    Any help is appreciated.
    Gordon Robb

    450 KB per page or hallf that size you got with optimization is not bad. You are not going to get good greyscale documents that look like the original by cutting the size any further. If you want it to look the best and be good for OCR if you need that later, I'd recommend you make sure that you scan to TIFF and import the tiff or get your scanning software to do the equivalent.

  • Can anyone shed some light on the bizarre filing system?

    Ive been using Iphoto for years and have yet to ask or figure out the file naming system.. for instance under 2002 there are a ton of folders that are named as a number and inside of thise more of the same. I cant figure out WHAT the logic is? Enlighten me..

    A Note about the v6 iPhoto Library Folder:
    In this folder there are various files, which are the Library itself and some ancillary files. Then you have three folders
    Originals are the photos as they were downloaded from your camera or scanner.
    (ii) Modified contains edited pics, shots that you have cropped, rotated or changed in any way.
    This allows the Photos -> Revert to Original command - very useful if you don't like the changes you've made.
    (iii) Data holds the thumbnails the the app needs to show you the photos in the iPhoto Window.
    It is strongly advised that you do not move, change or in anyway alter things in the iPhoto Library Folder as this can cause the application to fail and even lead to data loss
    There are three ways (at least) to get files from the iPhoto Window.
    1. Drag and Drop: Drag a photo from the iPhoto Window to the desktop, there iPhoto will make a full-sized copy of the pic.
    2. File -> Export: Select the files in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export. The dialogue will give you various options, including altering the format, naming the files and changing the size. Again, producing a copy.
    3. Show File: Right- (or Control-) Click on a pic and in the resulting dialogue choose 'Show File'. A Finder window will pop open with the file already selected.
    Rolls in the iPhoto Window correspond exactly with the Roll Folders in the Originals Folder in the iPhoto Library Folder. You can move photos between Rolls, you can rename rolls, edit them, create them, as long as you do it via the iPhoto Window. Check out the Info Pane (wee 'i', lower left) the name and date fields are editable. Edit a Roll Name using the Info Pane, the Roll Folder in iPhoto Library Folder/Originals will also have the new name.
    Regards
    TD
    Message was edited by: Terence Devlin

  • Confused about import and workflow using existing filing system

    Ok folks, I purchased Lightroom last week and I am still staring at an empty Library module. I have thousands of images but I seem to have been overcome by a case of anxiety/paralysis. Why, you ask? I can't determine an import strategy; here's why.
    I maintain three versions of every photo: 1) Original RAW, 2)Processed Tif, and 3) a Screen/web-ready Jpg
    Photos are sequencially numbered and maintained in folders as in the example below:
    - Main folder, 00001-00048
    -- 3 Sub-folders: RAW, Tif, Jpg,
    --- Each sub-folder has a sub-folder containing 24 photos (e.g 00001-00024 and 00025-00048)
    Method to my madness...
    - Each Main folder/content fits nicely on a DVD
    - 24 files to each sub-folder makes a nice printed 4 column, 6 row contact sheet and a 1024 x 768 contact sheet for the computer screen.
    Obviously I do not want all 3 versions of every photo visible in the library but I do want access to all of them through LR. Can I import all three versions and stack them?
    Also, I typically d/l my RAW files from a card reader to a d/l folder, preview and delete, process keepers via PS and save as Tif, batch rename picking up where I left off from the last batch, and finally resize/convert to Jpg and save copies. All files are then moved to numbered folders on a backup hard drive and burned to two DVDs.
    Given the new/required import methodology, is this process of saving, renaming, moving to different folders, etc., still possible using LR, or do I have to reinvent the wheel?
    Apologies for the lengthy post - appreciate any and all input. Thanks in advance for your assistance.
    Jeff

    > Can I import all three versions and stack them?
    Well, you can only stack within a folder, not across the hierarchy. So they'll all need different names and to be in the same folder. But leaving them in their own folders should work, and there are ways to hide them, like making the RAWs red, the TIFFs green, and the JPEGs purple, or something like that. Then just filter for what you want.
    Your downloading etc. system should still work in LR.

  • ITunes Filing System

    I have noticed that iTunes on the backend database files albums and songs in a VERY strange fashion. It seems to put a ton of my songs into a folder called COMPLIATIONS or something like that. I have manually gone in and removed these albums from COMPLIATIONS and put them back into a sorting by Artist Name or Albumn title and then relinked them through the iTunes user interface. This has been a painful process. I have also noticed that single song purchases on iTunes are often filed under the album name even if you did not buy the full album. I have again interviened manually to reclassify such cases as a folder under the artists name called MISC. Two questions.....
    1.) Have I screwed myself by renaming all of these folders in anyway?
    2.) Is there a way to force iTunes to have me tell it where I want the songs filed not only in terms of general location but also by name of the folder within that drive?
    Just curious- why does iTunes file so poorly on the backend?
    Thank you

    You could also blame the Gracenote CDDB database, whichi is where iTunes gets its CD info. If CDDB has it listed as a Compilation, that's how iTunes lists it.
    I am with you on being a Compilations hater!
    So, I get rid of the Compilations checkbox when I'm importing CDs. That is the easiest way.
    If you have iTunes managing your music, you are making it very difficult. Instead of all that moving around and relinking, just select all the tracks for that album, right click and get Info. Make sure Album Artist is filled in, the uncheck the "Part of a Compilation" .
    That will make itunes put it in the Artist folder for you, without losing the link to the files.

  • Why did my upgrade to Maverick result in my not being able to access my Documents in the previous format? Why did I not have the option to change my 'filing' system to use the new 'Tags'? Had reinstall 10.8.5 to access my Documents

    Why did Maverick not enable me to access my Documents in the previous format (Grid) and when using the alternative I could not 'clik' to open them. The same applied when I tried to open documents from within my back up disc (LaCie). I had to reinstall 10.8.5 and back up from my LaCie (thankfully) to gain access to all my critical Documents? To deal with this I spent 3 and hlafg hours on telephone to Apple Support ( very helpful - but unable to resolve issues - then 3 hours in Apple Store (again very helpful but only able to assist by clearinng Maverick from my HD and reinstalling 10.8.5. Fortunately LaCie came to the resuce and I was able to back up Mac HD with all my documents but lost about one week of work....!!
    Why did I not have the option when upgrading to Maverick to select the new 'Tag" system which I did not want?

    10.8.5 is the lates ML edition.  I use TM and also carbon copy cloner as my second backup.  If I were you and you have a TM backup prior to Mavericks I would try another restore at bootup.  You should erase your drive first in that process using disk utitlites and then use TM to put back you apps and files.  The other choice is to do an internet recovery and then use TM to restore your apps and files.  That should fix the permissions issue.  I did the same thing and all was OK including getting my original iPhoto progam (9.4.3), iphoto11 and photos back.

  • How to create a simple filing system for my personal material

    --After using Windows for several years, I have bought my first Apple computer last month: MacBook Pro, with OS X Mavericks 10.9.5. I find that just creating files, saving text/photos etc in them, and then creating a folder and saving the files in the folder, is a major operation for me. Obviously there must be a simple, straightforward way to do it, that I don't know. I have not found anything in my Apple books - too basic for them. If somebody could help me, I will appreciate. I am new to the Apple system, so please describe to me step-by-step the way.
    --Also, should I download the new Yosemite 10.10 now? Thanks.

    Hi ..
    You can save text files to the Documents folder.
    You can save photos to the Pictures folder.
    Open the Finder. From the Finder menu bar click Finder > Preferences then select the Sidebar tab.
    The Finder can also be opened by clicking the Finder icon in the Dock.
    Select both:  Documents and Pictures
    That makes it convenient to save text files and photos.
    As far as Yosemite goes, since you're coming from Windows, it be better to learn Mac OS X there first, then upgrade to Yosemite at a later date. It's free and available at the App Store. The App Store icon should be in your Dock.
    Bob LeVitus writes a very helpful Dummies for Mavericks manual for sale at Amazon here.

Maybe you are looking for