Final Cut Pro X MacBook Pro Retina 15'' (Late 2013) Question

Hello,
Knowing that it is always good practice that your "OS drive" and "Media to Edit drive" is the right way to do things for multiple reasons.
1. We used to operate on spinning drives. Said drives would average out at say 100MBps read and 100MBps write. Having to read/write the application and cache it in RAM and use the same drive to access media would obviously bottleneck the system somewhere.
2. SSDs used to be really expensive and we use to have 64 or 128GB SSDs just running our OS and have the cheaper storage and/or RAID drives manage our media.
The question is now in relation to the latest iteration of Apple's MacBook Pro Retina 15'' (specifically the 1TB and 2.6GHz) version which geekbench'd the highest single-core score any mac has ever geekbenched. But most importantly scores an astonishing 675MBps write and 725Mps read due to its PCIe connector.
With those ridiculous speeds nearing what many extremely striped RAIDs couldn't achieve only a few years ago, and the whole system architecture handling application management. Is it safe to say that editing can be done on the internal drive as a regular practice (keeping in mind that SSDs do have limited read/writes) and that it's not ideal, but the trade-off being not lugging around hard drives everywhere you go.
Any thoughts/opinions/constatations/technicalsavvy/banter on this subject is openly welcome.
Thanks,
Nick

If the content you are editing fits comfortably within the space you have in the SSD (with allowances for extra stuff that the system may need to store there, like VM, caches, etc), I can see no reason why not.
You can work on the SSD on the field and move the events and projects not in use to externals. This seems a very reasonable way to work on these machines.

Similar Messages

Can edit videos with Final Cut ProX a macbook pro 13 "??, can edit videos with Final Cut ProX a macbook pro 13 "??, can edit videos with Final Cut ProX a macbook pro 13 "??

can edit videos with Final Cut ProX a macbook pro 13 "??

Hi p,
Check out the requirements here: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4664
If your MBP meets them, it should work fine.

Final cut 4 on MacBook Pro

I have a MacBook Pro (bought 6 months ago). I installed Final Cut 4 and when I tried opening it, it said that I needed an Agp graphics card.
Anyone know anything about that? Is this version of final cut compatible with the Mac Book Pro?
MacBook Pro

Shane's exactly right - Now is the best time to upgrade to the full Final Cut Suite. You MIGHT be able to hobble along with FCP4 if you follow this hack:
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/feedback/finalcut_pro_on_oldmacs.html
Patrick

MacBook Pro Retina 15'' (Late 2013) Question

Hello,
I'm thinking of getting a MacBook Pro Retina 15'' (Late 2013). I know it comes installed with Mavericks. I would like to know if it would be possible to install Mountain Lion, since Mavericks' iBooks is horrible and mostly screws up my huge library of books I had on iTunes. I would aslo like to avoid the countless incompatible pieces of software that have so far crashed on mavericks.
Long story short, I would like to format the new MacBook Pro and install Mountain Lion. Will it allow me to do so?
Thanks
Nick

Hi ds store,
I don't think the MacBook Pro I'm talking about has mountain lion, because they were released only a few days ago and come with mavericks installed from the factory

Final Cut Crashes on macbook pro, please help!

Hi!
I just bought Final Cut Studio 3, but Im having some issues. Final Cut Pro 7 crashes at startup, everytime. Motion 4 crashes when I click on "file". Color and DVD studio works okay-ish (I havent tried them out extensively)
Could this be due to my macbook pro 4.1 not being good enough? I have 4 gb ram, 2,4 ghz, and I dont think it has integrated graphics, so it seems to pass all requirements.
Please help me! I paid lots of money for this program, so it would be a shame if I cant get it to work.

Hi Mads,
These are the specs recommended by apple.
http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/specs/
Also, do you have any third party filters/effects loaded.

Final cut studio and macbook pro

hi i have final cut studio 2 currently installed on my imac, and it kinda slows my general use of the computer
i bought a new macbook pro (the new one with aluminum casing), but its only the base, and i have not upgraded it in any way, so it is as it comes
and basically i was wondering, if i installed the entire final cut studio 2 (and aperture), how would it affect the general speed of the machine when doing other general tasks not FCS related:
a) while FCS is running
and b) while it is not running
i also want to run games off of my MBP so i really dont want to compromise speed

It needs to be filled with RAM, and when running Pro Apps, in the faster graphics processor mode. Mail, etc. will likely run fine along side them. I'd not play games when rendering though.
When they don't run, they don't affect anything but disk space 60 gigs for it all including Templates... RAM is the key to running multiple apps on any given Mac.
Nice Mac too. I just saw one the other day for the first time. I love that new trackpad the most. It's likely a lot faster than my 2.3 laptop, and I can run all the apps at the same time no problem with it. But ya need to fill up the RAM. I like that it's so green.
Jerry

Final Cut Express 2/MacBook Pro

I have a MacBook Pro (purchased in June 2006). I am trying to install Final Cut Express 2, but it says that I need to install an AGP Graphics Card in order to open and use the application. The computer already has a graphics card in it (ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Graphics Processor I THINK), so I don't know how to proceed. Please help!
MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Do what Ian says, but it will be very slow, as it is running through Rosetta Emulation, so you should upgrade to FCE 3.5.
- Craig

Final Cut Studio on MacBook Pro

Will all Final Cut Studio 2 programs and features run efficiently on a new MacBook Pro 13"? If not, what MacBook Pro would be the cheapest to run it on?

Greetings,
I just upgraded to a new 3.06 GHz 17 inch MacBookPro with 4 GB of RAM from the previous generation 17 inch MacBookPro with a 2.33 GHz processor. I have noticed a tremendous increase in performance and ability to render and export with ease and alacrity.
Having said that, my general question is: Does anyone have any general advice for hardware/ video setup configurations? I am very well versed with iMovie (ha!), and now I am seriously trying to graduate to Final Cut Studio. I have made a few clips and played around with various transitions, filters, etc, but does anyone have advice for what settings I should be using?
Oh yeah, I have a Sony AVCHD Camcorder (HDR-CX7)... I am not a fan of the CMOS chip, but nonetheless, it is what I have at the moment.
Any feedback will be appreciated.
Cheers.

Trying to install final cut on my macbook pro. HELP!!!!!!

hello
i have a macbook pro. i am trying to install final cut. when i put the disc in and follow the prompts, it tells me that my computer no longer supports this power pc application. if i download os x mountain lion, will i be able to install final cut on my laptop? i think the problem has something to do with something called rosetta. but im not totally sure. does mountain lion have anything to do with rosetta?

What version of Final Cut do you have?
There are versions that are Intel, but the installer is a PowerPC app. I have Final Cut Express 3.x and it is working on Lion and ML. If you have a working version of Final Cut on a Mac with Snow Leopard, you can manually copy all necessary files from there to your new Mac - that is how I got it to work (my installer is PPC also). Following are the instructions that I followed (although they are for deletion, it does not matter - it gives all the locations, so I just copied the files to an external and put them in the exact same spots on the new iMac):
http://support.apple.com/kb/TA38198?viewlocale=en_US

Logic Pro X MacBook Pro Retina 15'' (Late 2013) Question

Hello,
Knowing that it is always good practice that your "OS drive" and "Media to Edit drive" is the right way to do things for multiple reasons.
1. We used to operate on spinning drives. Said drives would average out at say 100MBps read and 100MBps write. Having to read/write the application and cache it in RAM and use the same drive to access media would obviously bottleneck the system somewhere.
2. SSDs used to be really expensive and we use to have 64 or 128GB SSDs just running our OS and have the cheaper storage and/or RAID drives manage our media.
The question is now in relation to the latest iteration of Apple's MacBook Pro Retina 15'' (specifically the 1TB and 2.6GHz) version which geekbench'd the highest single-core score any mac has ever geekbenched. But most importantly scores an astonishing 675MBps write and 725Mps read due to its PCIe connector.
With those ridiculous speeds nearing what many extremely striped RAIDs couldn't achieve only a few years ago, and the whole system architecture handling application management. Is it safe to say that editing can be done on the internal drive as a regular practice (keeping in mind that SSDs do have limited read/writes) and that it's not ideal, but the trade-off being not lugging around hard drives everywhere you go.
Any thoughts/opinions/constatations/technicalsavvy/banter on this subject is openly welcome.
Thanks,
Nick

Well I have this problem too, do you get a message saying 'an error has occured please press a button to restart' or something similar when you just brosing the internet or watching a movie.
P.S I use safari and QT.

I am traveling with my macbook pro and I forgot to install final cut express and quicktime pro before I left. How can I in a way download them for free on my laptop from where I am

I am traveling with my macbook pro and I forgot to install final cut express and quicktime pro before I left. How can I in a way download them for free on my laptop from where I am? I need them and don't want naturally to buy them again!!!
Thank you

Assuming you purchased QT Pro, you can always download it again at no extra charge by logging in to your Apple account.
Regarding FCE, there is no way to download & install the product. You need an original FCE install disk and your FCE serial number.
Final Cut Pro X (aka FCPX) can be purchased & downloaded from the App Store.

Problem sending timeline from Final Cut to a Soundtrack Pro Multitrack Project

Hello,
Thank you in advance for reading. I am having trouble sending a timeline from Final Cut to a Soundtrack Pro Multitrack Project. Final Cut makes a new Soundtrack Pro project file just fine and opens Soundtrack Pro as it's supposed to, but the project in Soundtrack Pro only has a portion of my audio tracks. I've tried sending by control clicking the sequence in the browser and selecting 'Send to Soundtrack Pro Multitrack Project' as well as highlighting my entire timeline and doing the same. Both result in the same Soundtrack Pro proejct with about 1/3 of my total 48 audio tracks (lots of sound FX).
I'm using Final Cut 7.0.2 and Soundtrack Pro 3.0.1 My computer is a Macbook Pro running OS 10.6.8, 2.26 ghz intel core 2 duo, 4 gb ram.
Any suggestions (or workarounds, if it comes to that) anyone has will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks again, Gabe

Try building the project to your desktop and then open the Video_TS in the Mac DVD player application.
How does it play/sound? This application is the best way to see and hear how your burned DVD should play vs. just using simulator and burning.
Just to clarify- are you taking your FC QT file into Compressor and creating a MPG-2 and AC3 file or are you bringing your FC QT directly into DSP?
What codec are you exporting from FC? ProRes422, DV, H264?
Open the FC QT in QT and apple+I to see this.
What does it say for audio?

MacBook Pro retina 13" (late 2013, Haswell) why is the highest resolution rendered in 3360x2100, which the system obviously can't handle?!

Hey Apple and Apple users,
I just recently switched from an MacBook Air (mid 2013) to the new Haswell MacBook Pro retina 13" (late 2013 model).
The main reason to do so was the better screen and the option to run higher scaled resolutions, as advertised.
I was willing to trade in the Air's low weight, smaller formfactor and the extra batterylife for the better screen.
When it comes to resolutions:
1280x800 is just a joke nowadays, why is the MacBook Pro still based on it? 13" and 1440x900 work quite fine...see MacBook Air.
1440x900 is okay in everyday life situations, but sometimes you just need "more space" as the third scaling option calls it as well in the display-settings.
1680x1050 on 13" can sometimes be challenging, but it is really fine if you need to work and have a lot UI elements to deal with (Photoshop etc.)
So 1680x1050 scaled on the 2560x1600 screen would be my daily driver for work. So I expected a scaling factor of "1.5238..." (2560/1680) will be used most of the time.
Frankly spoken...I am really disappointed by the 13" retina MacBook Pro and the way OS X Mavericks is handling the scaling.
It obiously works well and responsive with the 1280x800 non-scaling resolution ("best for retina, scaling factor 2: 1280 --> 2560).
Is still "okay-snappy" at 1440x900 (scaling factor 1.777...: 1440 --> 2560).
But it totally breaks down at 1680x1050 (scaling factor 1.523...: 1680 --> 2560).
I use "Mission Control" all the time and it is stuttering and slow...overall a sluggish and unbearable experience.
The same goes for Desktop-Switching by swiping the screens or resizing and moving windows and files around.
So I was wondering why...and then I noticed that when taking a screenshot of my entire screen (CMD + 3) the image size of the screenshot was 3360x2100 and not the expected 2560x1600.
This means Mavericks is not scaling the UI with the appropriate factor (see above). For retina MacBooks it ist simply rendering one pixel of the classic, non-retina Interface in now 4 pixels (2x2) and sending this straight to the screen, which then "scales" it down to the resolution it is able to display.
Why is this bothering me? – Because the machine has to do a lot more work to render the higher resolution that can't even be displayed, due to the screens limitations.
2560x1600 = 4096000 pixels = 100%
3360x2100 = 7056000 pixels = 172%
This means the MacBook has to render 72% more information than actually can be displayed on the built-in screen and are just lost.
Of course this makes the overall UI feel sluggish and idly! Especially with the not that performant Intel Iris IGP and no dedicated graphics card.
All this extra "rendering" just results in a worse battery life due to the extra work that the graphics card and CPU have to do.
First, Apple...are you serious about this?
What can we do about this?
Is there a way to have this properly scaled?
Thanks in advance to everyone.

Okay...I thought deeply about this issue.
Even looking into ways to maybe fixing this on the software side. But it occured to me that this is to deeply embedded into the system that it won't be possbile to come up with a sufficient third-party solution.taht
The problem is that there is no intermediate step inbetween "standard DPI" graphics and "HiDPI" (image-resources named "[email protected]").
But there should be one, to minimize the amount of image information that needs to be processed by the device.
This effects especially the MacBook Pro retina 13", as it has the less powerful Intel Iris IGP, when performing on the highest scaled resolution (equivalent to 1650x1080).
As well as the MacBook Pro retina 15" without a dedicated, second Graphics Unit,when performing on the highest possible scaled resolution (equivalent to 1920x1200).
Those devices don't have enough resources to handle the consequential "HiDPI" resolutions of 3360x2100 for the 13" and 3840x2400 for the 15" model.
(Comment: 3840x2400 = 9,2MP, which is more than the standard 4K resolution of 3840x2160.
I analyzed the scaling factors as follows:
Factor "2" to display 1280x800 on the 13" model and 1440x900 on the 15" model in HiDPI.
Factor "1.777..." would be required to display 1440x900 on the 2560x1600 screen of the 13" model.
Factor "1.714..." would be required to display 1650x1080 on the 2880x1800 screen of the 15" model.
Factor "1.523..." would be required to display 1650x1080 on the 2560x1600 screen of the 13" model.
Factor "1.5" would be required to display 1920x1200 on the 2800x1800 screen of the 15" model.
As all the models seem to have no problem with rendering the intermediate scaling step (1440x900 for the 13" and 1680x1050 for the 15" model) at HiDPI, hence with the scaling factor 2. There is no real need to provide the UI-elements.
But in my opinion there is a strong need for a "MidDPI" ([email protected]) intermediate step for all the UI graphic elements that wis based on the scaling factor 1.5.
This would result in the following:
13" MacBook Pro retina with 2560x1600 screen:
1280x 800 @ 2x = 2560x1600 (no surplus, native screen resolution)
1440x 900 @ 2x = 2880x1800 (the surplus of 1088000px = ~1MP can still be handled and compansated by the weak Iris IGP)
1680x1050 @ 2x = 3360x2100 (the surplus of 2960000px = ~3MP is too much for the weak Iris IGP)
NEW 1680x1050 @ 1.5x = 2520x1575 (with a small border of left=20px, bottom=13, right=20, top=12 pixels, which means ~2,2mm and ~1.3mm around the 1.5x scaled image!).
15" MacBook Pro retina with 2880x1800 screen:
1440x900 @ 2x = 2880x1800 (no surplus, native screen resolution)
1680x1050 @ 2x = 3360x2100 (the surplus of 1872000px = ~2MP can still be handled by the Iris Pro IGP)
1920x1200 @ 2x = 3840x2400 (the surplus of 4032000px = ~4MP can't be handled sufficiently by the Iris Pro IGP)
NEW 1920x1200 @ 1.5x = 2800x1800 (nu surplus, native screen resolution, no border needed!)
The big advantage is that all the graphics have already been remodeled for the HiDPI mode.
So scaling those "factor 2x" images down to "factor 1.5x" should be comparably easy!
Example:
Left: Traditional "standard DPI" icon of "all my files".
Right: "@2x.png" for the "HiDPI" modes.
Middle: "@1.5x.png" suggestions for the "MidDPI" mode; easily scaled down from the lovely HiDPI graphics.
With this simple introduction of the "MidDPI" modes a significant amount of processing power can be saved.
This not only improves battery life when driving those higher scaled resolutions, but also lets the user access those resources for what really matters: processing power for the primary job that the Mac needs to get done.
Thanks in advance.

Frequent Kernel Panics on Macbook Pro Retina 15" late 2013

Since a few weeks my Macbook Pro is suffering from frequent kernel panics. The logic board has already been replaced by the Apple but the panics keep occurring.
Machine specs: Macbook Pro retina 15" late 2013, 2.6Ghz Core I7, 16GB Ram, 1TB SSD. This is the model with the discrete Nvidia graphics card.
Already tried, clean install from usb, internet recovery, reset of SMC, PRAM, the machine passes the build in diagnostics and the Apple Store diagnostics.
The following panics occur without specific action from my part so they can happen when the Macbook is idle or when in use. There is no other software installed in the machine than OS X Yosemite and the latest updates.
Every kernel panic (currently 12 in the last 5 hours) show the latest loaded Kext, AppleHWSensor and latest unloaded Kext AppleFileSystemDriver which seems like more than a coincidence.
Hopefully someone can point me in the direction of cause of the problem.
Anonymous UUID:       520FBDBE-27D4-C829-C678-B83F981E20E0
Thu Jan 22 11:13:09 2015
*** Panic Report ***
Machine-check capabilities: 0x0000000000000c0a
family: 6 model: 70 stepping: 1 microcode: 15
signature: 0x40661
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz
10 error-reporting banks
Processor 0: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005
IA32_MC9_STATUS(0x425): 0xfe4000c00002011b
IA32_MC9_ADDR(0x426):   0x037205800007db26
IA32_MC9_MISC(0x427):   0x00000003085581c0
Processor 1: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005
IA32_MC9_STATUS(0x425): 0xfe4000c00002011b
IA32_MC9_ADDR(0x426):   0x037205800007db26
IA32_MC9_MISC(0x427):   0x00000003085581c0
Processor 2: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005
IA32_MC9_STATUS(0x425): 0xfe4000c00002011b
IA32_MC9_ADDR(0x426):   0x037205800007db26
IA32_MC9_MISC(0x427):   0x00000003085581c0
Processor 3: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005
IA32_MC9_STATUS(0x425): 0xfe4000c00002011b
IA32_MC9_ADDR(0x426):   0x037205800007db26
IA32_MC9_MISC(0x427):   0x00000003085581c0
Processor 4: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005
IA32_MC9_STATUS(0x425): 0xfe4000c00002011b
IA32_MC9_ADDR(0x426):   0x037205800007db26
IA32_MC9_MISC(0x427):   0x00000003085581c0
Processor 5: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005
IA32_MC9_STATUS(0x425): 0xfe4000c00002011b
IA32_MC9_ADDR(0x426):   0x037205800007db26
IA32_MC9_MISC(0x427):   0x00000003085581c0
Processor 6: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005
IA32_MC9_STATUS(0x425): 0xfe4000c00002011b
IA32_MC9_ADDR(0x426):   0x037205800007db26
IA32_MC9_MISC(0x427):   0x00000003085581c0
Processor 7: IA32_MCG_STATUS: 0x0000000000000005
IA32_MC9_STATUS(0x425): 0xfe4000c00002011b
IA32_MC9_ADDR(0x426):   0x037205800007db26
IA32_MC9_MISC(0x427):   0x00000003085581c0
panic(cpu 3 caller 0xffffff801781f12a): "Machine Check at 0xffffff801783af57, registers:\n" "CR0: 0x000000008001003b, CR2: 0x00007f800b060400, CR3: 0x000000001a904000, CR4: 0x00000000001626e0\n" "RAX: 0x0000000000000033, RBX: 0x07ffffffff85f496, RCX: 0x0000000000000001, RDX: 0x0000000000000000\n" "RSP: 0xffffff82030d3ee0, RBP: 0xffffff82030d3f20, RSI: 0xffffff8017ee8c40, RDI: 0xffffff8017e29d60\n" "R8: 0x0000000100000000, R9: 0x0000000000000000, R10: 0x0000000000000003, R11: 0x0000000000000200\n" "R12: 0x0000000000000000, R13: 0xffffff8017ee9640, R14: 0x00000000000009c0, R15: 0x0000000000000033\n" "RFL: 0x0000000000000046, RIP: 0xffffff801783af57, CS: 0x0000000000000008, SS: 0x0000000000000000\n" "Error code: 0x0000000000000000\n"@/SourceCache/xnu/xnu-2782.1.97/osfmk/i386/trap_native.c:1 68
Backtrace (CPU 3), Frame : Return Address
0xffffff81f7545e90 : 0xffffff801773a811
0xffffff81f7545f10 : 0xffffff801781f12a
0xffffff81f7546070 : 0xffffff801783acef
0xffffff82030d3f20 : 0xffffff80178202ae
0xffffff82030d3f40 : 0xffffff80177514bb
0xffffff82030d3f90 : 0xffffff8017751970
0xffffff82030d3fb0 : 0xffffff80178192c7
BSD process name corresponding to current thread: kernel_task
Mac OS version:
14B25
Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 14.0.0: Fri Sep 19 00:26:44 PDT 2014; root:xnu-2782.1.97~2/RELEASE_X86_64
Kernel UUID: 89E10306-BC78-3A3B-955C-7C4922577E61
Kernel slide:     0x0000000017400000
Kernel text base: 0xffffff8017600000
__HIB text base: 0xffffff8017500000
System model name: MacBookPro11,3 (Mac-2BD1B31983FE1663)
System uptime in nanoseconds: 5128992840770
last loaded kext at 4411235159: com.apple.driver.AppleHWSensor 1.9.5d0 (addr 0xffffff7f99d14000, size 36864)
last unloaded kext at 85121680121: com.apple.driver.AppleFileSystemDriver 3.0.1 (addr 0xffffff7f99ff7000, size 8192)
loaded kexts:
com.apple.driver.AppleHWSensor 1.9.5d0
com.apple.driver.AudioAUUC 1.70
com.apple.driver.ApplePlatformEnabler 2.1.0d1
com.apple.driver.AGPM 100.14.37
com.apple.driver.X86PlatformShim 1.0.0
com.apple.filesystems.autofs 3.0
com.apple.driver.AppleOSXWatchdog 1
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothSerialManager 4.3.1f2
com.apple.driver.AppleGraphicsDevicePolicy 3.7.7
com.apple.driver.AppleHDA 267.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUpstreamUserClient 3.6.1
com.apple.GeForce 10.0.0
com.apple.iokit.IOUserEthernet 1.0.1
com.apple.iokit.BroadcomBluetoothHostControllerUSBTransport 4.3.1f2
com.apple.driver.AppleSMCLMU 2.0.4d1
com.apple.driver.AppleLPC 1.7.3
com.apple.driver.AppleMuxControl 3.7.21
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltIP 2.0.2
com.apple.driver.AppleMCCSControl 1.2.10
com.apple.driver.AppleCameraInterface 5.23.0
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelHD5000Graphics 10.0.0
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelFramebufferAzul 10.0.0
com.apple.Dont_Steal_Mac_OS_X 7.0.0
com.apple.driver.AppleHWAccess 1
com.apple.driver.AppleHV 1
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBTCButtons 240.2
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBCardReader 3.5.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBTCKeyboard 240.2
com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeDataless 1.0.0d1
com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib 1.0.0d1
com.apple.BootCache 35
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBHub 705.4.1
com.apple.driver.XsanFilter 404
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIBlockStorage 2.6.5
com.apple.driver.AppleAHCIPort 3.0.7
com.apple.driver.AirPort.Brcm4360 901.19.10
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBXHCI 705.4.14
com.apple.driver.AppleSmartBatteryManager 161.0.0
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIButtons 3.1
com.apple.driver.AppleRTC 2.0
com.apple.driver.AppleHPET 1.8
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBIOS 2.1
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIEC 3.1
com.apple.driver.AppleAPIC 1.7
com.apple.nke.applicationfirewall 161
com.apple.security.quarantine 3
com.apple.security.TMSafetyNet 8
com.apple.kext.triggers 1.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSerialFamily 11
com.apple.driver.DspFuncLib 267.0
com.apple.kext.OSvKernDSPLib 1.15
com.apple.iokit.IOAudioFamily 200.6
com.apple.vecLib.kext 1.2.0
com.apple.nvidia.driver.NVDAGK100Hal 10.0.0
com.apple.nvidia.driver.NVDAResman 10.0.0
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothHostControllerUSBTransport 4.3.1f2
com.apple.driver.X86PlatformPlugin 1.0.0
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBUserClient 705.4.0
com.apple.driver.AppleHDAController 267.0
com.apple.iokit.IOHDAFamily 267.0
com.apple.driver.IOPlatformPluginFamily 5.8.0d49
com.apple.driver.AppleGraphicsControl 3.7.21
com.apple.driver.AppleBacklightExpert 1.1.0
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusController 1.0.13d1
com.apple.iokit.IOSurface 97
com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport 2.4.1
com.apple.AppleGraphicsDeviceControl 3.7.21
com.apple.iokit.IOAcceleratorFamily2 156.4
com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily 2.4.1
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothFamily 4.3.1f2
com.apple.driver.AppleSMC 3.1.9
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIBlockCommandsDevice 3.7.0
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBMassStorageClass 3.7.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIArchitectureModelFamily 3.7.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBMultitouch 245.2
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBHIDDriver 705.4.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBMergeNub 705.4.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBComposite 705.4.9
com.apple.driver.CoreStorage 471
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltDPInAdapter 4.0.6
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltDPAdapterFamily 4.0.6
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltPCIDownAdapter 2.0.2
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily 2.7.0
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltNHI 3.1.7
com.apple.iokit.IOThunderboltFamily 4.2.1
com.apple.iokit.IO80211Family 700.52
com.apple.driver.mDNSOffloadUserClient 1.0.1b8
com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily 3.2
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily 705.4.14
com.apple.driver.AppleEFINVRAM 2.0
com.apple.iokit.IOHIDFamily 2.0.0
com.apple.driver.AppleEFIRuntime 2.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSMBusFamily 1.1
com.apple.security.sandbox 300.0
com.apple.kext.AppleMatch 1.0.0d1
com.apple.driver.AppleKeyStore 2
com.apple.driver.AppleMobileFileIntegrity 1.0.5
com.apple.driver.AppleCredentialManager 1.0
com.apple.driver.DiskImages 389.1
com.apple.iokit.IOStorageFamily 2.0
com.apple.iokit.IOReportFamily 31
com.apple.driver.AppleFDEKeyStore 28.30
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIPlatform 3.1
com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily 2.9
com.apple.iokit.IOACPIFamily 1.4
com.apple.kec.corecrypto 1.0
com.apple.kec.Libm 1
com.apple.kec.pthread 1

Perhaps running Apple Diagnostics will provide a clue:
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202731
I suspect tha your best option is an appointment at an Apple store genius bar. (bring the kernel panic report with you)
Ciao.

Macbook Pro Retina 15 late 2013 won't turn on after being sleep

I've been having the an issue with my macbook pro retina 15 late 2013 that I bought 2 weeks ago. After a long time of being slept when I try to turn it on, it won't. I press the power button several times and nothing happens, after a long time of trying then it turns on. and I get the message that the machine turn off because of an error but nothing else. I think that's not ok for such an expensive laptop. I had the first version of the macbook pro retina display and never had an issue like this even though I install a lot of apps from app store and third party apps also. I was running parallels with 3 microsoft windows os and never had an issue like this. In this case I haven't installed anything on my new macbook pro besides parallels and the windows seven os. So I don't know if I should take it to the apple store maybe they could change it for another one I don't know.
Does anyone have the same problem?
sorry for my english

Well I have this problem too, do you get a message saying 'an error has occured please press a button to restart' or something similar when you just brosing the internet or watching a movie.
P.S I use safari and QT.

Final Cut Pro X MacBook Pro Retina 15'' (Late 2013) Question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for