Firefox 5 or 6 served over NFS to UNIX clients has problem finding shared object libraries.

With versions of firefox 3 and below, I was able to serve the application from a NFS share to all client workstations. Now I can not find a version above 3 that will run from just the NFS share. They all need shared libraries local (instead of just using the shared libraries in the NFS share)

It is just on Solaris we have the issue and even with local installed libraries it still crashes alot. On Redhat it works fine with the libraries in the NFS share.

Similar Messages

Mac OS X Server 10.4.10-11 client user problems

It appears that since updating to Mac OS X Server 10.4.10 (and now 10.4.11), running on an XServe G4 with 2GB of RAM, QuarkXPress Passport 6.5 (and also 6.52) crashes at the splash screen when newly created network users launch it on client computers running OS X 10.4.8, 10.4.10 and 10.4.11. QuarkXPress runs fine when logged in as the computer owner with administrator rights.
Users created under Mac OS X Server 10.4.8 do not have this problem and are able to launch QuarkXPress 6.5 or 6.52 without a problem on these same computers.
Quark license verification is supplied by a QLA 4.5 server running on a seperate computer to the OS X Server system.
Can anyone give me any pointers as to what may be causing the crash? A couple of extracts from the crash log are listed below - the full log is available if anyone can decipher it:
Date/Time: 2007-12-05 14:02:19.702 +0000
OS Version: 10.4.11 (Build 8S165)
Report Version: 4
Command: QuarkXPress
Path: /Applications/QuarkXPress 6.5/QuarkXPress Passport.app/Contents/MacOS/QuarkXPress
Parent: WindowServer [53]
Version: QuarkXPress version 6.52 (6.51)
PID: 238
Thread: 0
Exception: EXCBADACCESS (0x0001)
Codes: KERNPROTECTIONFAILURE (0x0002) at 0x00000009
Thread 0 Crashed:
0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90003ba0 szone_malloc + 616
1 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90003600 malloc + 632
2 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x00670a0c operator new(unsigned long) + 64
3 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x00616c98 std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::init(char const*, char const, std::allocator<char> const&, std::randomaccess_iteratortag) + 96
4 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x0062f7ec std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basicstring[in-charge](std::basicstring<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 56
5 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x00645408 std::_vector_imp<std::basicstring<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, (bool)0>::insert(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*, unsigned long, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 872
6 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x0045eccc PPDPath::SetPPDPath(char**, unsigned char) + 216
7 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x0045555c PPDMergeOSXAndClassic(char**, char**) + 340
8 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x004556bc PPDUpdate(unsigned char) + 328
9 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x004557b4 PPDInit() + 56
10 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x00016214 initialize() + 19176
11 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x0048a8e4 main + 224
12 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x000038d0 _start + 380
13 com.quark.QuarkXPress 0x00003750 _code_start_ + 48
Thread 0 crashed with PPC Thread State 64:
srr0: 0x0000000090003ba0 srr1: 0x000000000200f030 vrsave: 0x0000000000000000
cr: 0x84004444 xer: 0x0000000020000004 lr: 0x0000000090003a00 ctr: 0x0000000090003938
r0: 0x0000000000000008 r1: 0x00000000bfffec70 r2: 0x00000000fffffffe r3: 0x0000000002000038
r4: 0x0000000000000000 r5: 0x0000000005f66510 r6: 0x00000000ffffffff r7: 0x0000000000000001
r8: 0x0000000000000001 r9: 0x0000000000000001 r10: 0x0000000002000054 r11: 0x00000000020000d0
r12: 0x0000000090003938 r13: 0x000000000522d97c r14: 0x0000000000011740 r15: 0x0000000000010032
r16: 0x0000000000000019 r17: 0x000000000000000a r18: 0x00000000bb1a85b2 r19: 0x00000000007cb618
r20: 0x00000000a0003948 r21: 0x00000000ffffffff r22: 0x0000000000000002 r23: 0x0000000000000024
r24: 0x00000000a0003390 r25: 0x0000000005f6653c r26: 0x0000000002000000 r27: 0x0000000005f6653c
r28: 0x0000000000000003 r29: 0x00000000a0003390 r30: 0x0000000005f76d50 r31: 0x0000000090003948

Hi
Have you tried repairing privileges and permissions on the affected clients?
You could also try creating a new admin account on the affected clients and logging in with that. Launch Quark and see if it behaves the same way. If it does not then its more likely some damaged/corrupted plist or preference in the primary admin account’s Home/Library/Preferences folder.
It could also be down to a damaged/corrupted font or Xpress Preferences file. Running the 10.4.10/11 update could be a red herring and its just coincidence that the issues you are seeing happened after the update. Generally an application crashes on launch or when opening a file because its had a problem building the font list or trying to access/load a font when the file has been requested. If your Font Management system is Suitcase remove the Suitcase Preferences folder from /Users/Home/Library/Preferences and restart the mac. Hopefully Quark should now launch. Redefine font sets from there. Quark keeps its Preferences file in /Users/Home/Library/Application Support/Quark.
Of course it could be none of these in which case start looking at drive/directory issues or possibly system issues. You may be looking at an Archive/Reinstall of the OS or Reinstall of the application. Don’t rule out a rebuild either.
Hope this helps, Tony

Can I update to earlier than the latest (currently 8) version of Firefox? I need that because my test frameword has problems starting Firefox version 8 and there were no such problems up until version 7.

I recently updated from Firefox 7 to Firefox 8.
Until version 7 the test framework I use, based on Selenium, was working normally with the browser. Since I updated to version 8 - the framework can't open any browser session. So I had to downgrade to older version to be able to run my tests. But the only older version than 8 was 3.6 - really stable but very, very old one.
So I need to choose to work with any version between 3.6 and 8, excluding 8 for now.
How can this happen from the Firefox site?

Nice try, but this url does not work anymore 10 Dec 2011. Are we ever going to have an answer as to why all versions before V8 were dropped off the map back to 3.6? Is 3.6 secure?

Mountain Lion Server with Windows 8.1 Client communication problems

We have a Mountain Lions Server and several diffent Clients that need access to it.
Macs work fine Linux clients work fine
Windows 8.1 only "sees" the router but not the Server or the Printer
the "Windows proofs" tell me its a Problem with the server
has anyone an Idea what I can do?
And pls don't tell me I should change all Windows clients to Mac. If I had so much money I would, but at the moment the existing systems need to stay.
@ Templeton Pack
I know this is a Mac Community
and no google doesn't solve all Problems

Well no, Google doesn't solve all problems, but its a great place to start.
As far as your issue goes, you need to provide more details before anyone could begin to guess, as we're not mind readers here.
What do you mean by "Windows only sees the router, not the server"? What does "sees" mean in this context?
Who / what is Windows proofs?
How are you trying to access the server? SMB file sharing? If so, how are you trying to connect? What happens when you try? Do the users trying to authenticate to the server have an account on it and access to the necessary services?

10.3.9 Server with 10.4.x clients: any problems?

I'm thinking of upgrading our clients from 10.3.9 to 10.4.6 (fresh install), while keeping the server on 10.3.9. The server is used as OD-Master, Mailserver, DNS, DHCP and Netboot (only for installing).
Are there any experiences, hints and problems?
Thanks a lot
Gerd
XServe G5 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

I did this exact thing. Corrupted imapd.conf. Corrected by restoring imapd.conf.default (or whatever it's called) via cp imapd.conf.default imapd.conf. Then I had no users. Was told to rebuild the cyrus database.
Although I was running the 10.3.9 server, I was directed to kb article #107996. I followed those steps, saw no errors during the rebuild process and all the users reappeared with their mail.
I note that kb article #301694 simplifies the process for Server 10.3.9 - don't know if that works or not as I did the process for Server 10.3 - 10.3.8 on the direction of an Apple Care specialist.

New files and folders on a Linux client mounting a Windows 2012 Server for NFS share do not inherit Owner and Group when SetGID bit set

Problem statement
When I mount a Windows NFS service file share using UUUA and set the Owner and Group, and set the SetGID bit on the parent folder in a hierarchy. New Files and folders inside and underneath the parent folder do not inherit the Owner and Group permissions
of the parent.
I am given to understand from this Microsoft KnowledgeBase article (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951716/en-gb) the problem is due to the Windows implmentation of NFS Services not supporting the Solaris SystemV or BSD grpid "Semantics"
However the article says the same functionality can acheived by using ACE Inheritance in conjunction with changing the Registry setting for "KeepInheritance" to enable Inheritance propagation of the Permissions by the Windows NFS Services.
1. The Precise location of the "KeepInheritance" DWORD key appears to have "moved" in Windows Server 2012 from a Services path to a Software path, is this documented somewhere? And after enabling it, (or creating it in the previous
location) the feature seems non-functional. Is there a method to file a Bug with Microsoft for this Feature?
2. All of the references on demonstrating how to set an ACE to achieve the same result "currently" either lead to broken links on Microsoft technical websites, or are not explicit they are vague or circumreferential. There are no plain Examples.
Can an Example be provided?
3. Is UUUA compatible with the method of setting ACE to acheive this result, or must the Linux client mount be "Mapped" using an Authentication source. And could that be with the new Flat File passwd and group files in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc
and is there an Example available.
Scenario:
Windows Server 2012 Standard
File Server (Role)
+- Server for NFS (Role) << -- installed
General --
Folder path: F:\Shares\raid-6-array
Remote path: fs4:/raid-6-array
Protocol: NFS
Authentication --
No server authentication
+- No server authentication (AUTH_SYS)
++- Enable unmapped user access
+++- Allow unmapped user access by UID/GID
Share Permissions --
Name: linux_nfs_client.host.edu
Permissions: Read/Write
Root Access: Allowed
Encoding: ANSI
NTFS Permissions --
Type: Allow
Principal: BUILTIN\Administrators
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
Type: Allow
Principal: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

I'm making some "major" progress on this problem.
1. Apparently the "semantics" issue to honor SGID or grpid in NFS on the server side or the client side has been debated for some time. It also existed as of 2009 between Solaris nfs server and Linux nfs clients. The Linux community defaulted to declaring
it a "Server" side issue to avoid "Race" conditions between simultaneous access users and the local file system daemons. The client would have to "check" for the SGID and reformulate its CREATE request to specify the Secondary group it would have to "notice"
by which time it could have changed on the server. SUN declined to fix it.. even though there were reports it did not behave the same between nfs3 vs nfs4 daemons.. which might be because nfs4 servers have local ACL or ACE entries to process.. and a new local/nfs
"inheritance" scheme to worry about honoring.. that could place it in conflict with remote access.. and push the responsibility "outwards" to the nfs client.. introducing a race condition, necessitating "locking" semantics.
This article covers that discovery and no resolution - http://thr3ads.net/zfs-discuss/2009/10/569334-CR6894234-improved-sgid-directory-compatibility-with-non-Solaris-NFS-clients
2. A much Older Microsoft Knowledge Based article had explicit examples of using Windows ACEs and Inheritance to "mitigate" the issue.. basically the nfs client "cannot" update an ACE to make it "Inheritable" [-but-] a Windows side Admin or Windows User
[-can-] update or promote an existing ACE to "Inheritable"
Here are the pertinent statements -
"In Windows Services for UNIX 2.3, you can use the KeepInheritance registry value to set inheritable ACEs and to make sure that these ACEs apply to newly created files and folders on NFS shares."
"Note About the Permissions That Are Set by NFS Clients
The KeepInheritance option only applies ACEs that have inheritance enabled. Any permissions that are set by an NFS client will
only apply to that file or folder, so the resulting ACEs created by an NFS client will
not have inheritance set."
"So
If you want a folder's permissions to be inherited to new subfolders and files, you must set its permissions from the Windows NFS server because the permissions that are set by NFS clients only apply to the folder itself."
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321049
3. I have set up a Windows 2008r2 NFS server and mounted it with a Redhat Enteprise Linux 5 release 10 x86_64 server [Oct 31, 2013] and so far this does appear to be the case.
4. In order to mount and then switch user to a non-root user to create subdirectories and files, I had to mount the NFS share (after enabling Anonymous AUTH_SYS mapping) this is not a good thing, but it was because I have been using UUUA - Unmapped Unix
User Access Mapping, which makes no attempt to "map" a Unix UID/GID set by the NFS client to a Windows User account.
To verify the Inheritance of additional ACEs on new subdirectories and files created by a non-root Unix user, on the Windows NFS server I used the right click properties, security tab context menu, then Advanced to list all the ACEs and looked at the far
Column reflecting if it applied to [This folder only, or This folder and Subdirectories, or This folder and subdirectories and files]
5. All new Subdirectories and files createdby the non-root user had a [Non-Inheritance] ACE created for them.
6. I turned a [Non-Inheritance] ACE into an [Inheritance] ACE by selecting it then clicking [Edit] and using the Drop down to select [This folder, subdirs and files] then I went back to the NFS client and created more subdirs and files. Then back to the
Windows NFS server and checked the new subdirs and folders and they did Inherit the Windows NFS server ACE! - However the UID/GID of the subdirs and folders remained unchanged, they did not reflect the new "Effective" ownership or group membership.
7. I "believe" because I was using UUUA and working "behind" the UID/GID presentation layer for the NFS client, it did not update that presentation layer. It might do that "if" I were using a Mapping mechanism and mapped UID/GID to Windows User SIDs and
Group SIDs. Windows 2008r2 no longer has a "simple" Mapping server, it does not accept flat text files and requires a Schema extension to Active Directory just to MAP a windows account to a UID/GID.. a lot of overhead. Windows Server 2012 accepts flat text
files like /etc/passwd and /etc/group to perform this function and is next on my list of things to see if that will update the UID/GID based on the Windows ACE entries. Since the Local ACE take precedence "over" Inherited ACEs there could be a problem. The
Inheritance appears to be intended [only] to retain Administrative rights over user created subdirs and files by adding an additional ACE at the time of creation.
8. I did verify from the NFS client side in Linux that "Even though" the UID/GID seem to reflect the local non-root user should not have the ability to traverse or create new files, the "phantom" NFS Server ACEs are in place and do permit the function..
reconciling the "view" with "reality" appears problematic, unless the User Mapping will update "effective" rights and ownership in the "view"
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

Server for NFS deletes the partially copied file after failover

Hello,
I found the strange behaviour in Server for NFS in the microsoft foc cluster.
I have a foc cluster of two nodes(windows server 2k12r2) and server for nfs role is installed on both. now I did mount the export from the client(windows server 2k12r2) where client for nfs role is installed;
and a large file copying from the clients local drive to the mounted export is started.
Now during this copying operation I did switch the export to second node(moved it using the failover cluster manager wizard). and what I found is the copying interrupts with
error message "there is problem accessing file path" and on retry the copying starts all over again, I mean if the 50% was copied previously then
after retry it will start from 0%.
I watched the system events on second node with the "procmon" and I found; after the disk gets attached to the second node, the delete operation is get called for this file.
Now what I need to know is why this delete is been called and who made this called. In the stack of the delete operation I could track the nfssvr.sys but not sure what attributes of that file made it to call the
delete.

Hi,
It takes us some time to create a failover cluster for testing.
We tried to copy a large folder which contains many files, and a large VHD file we created.
The result is the same - it will not restart the copy after failover. Thus as you said it is not caused by design and it should be an issue on your side which causes a Delete and redo the copy.
Is there any application or specific network settings could terminate a disconnected copy process? Currently I do not have much information about this.
Edit: I noticed that it is NFS share and in our test we are using SMB share. Will do the test again to see if any difference.

Incorrect file sizes shown in Finder over NFS and permissions issues

Hi there
This is a problem that existed for me in Leopard and has not been resolved in Snow Leopard.
I have an XSan with a Leopard server sharing over NFS and AFP. When I connect from a Leopard or Snow Leopard client over NFS the file sizes in Finder are incorrectly displayed. My Tiger clients work perfectly.
Also, although it says I have read write access to the files over NFS I cannot save over an existing file when I make changes to it, I instead have to create a new version of it and remove the old one.
Check the link to show a grab of one of the folders in question, the upper window is what the NFS shows me, the lower AFP. If you Get Info on the files over either connection the byte count is identical.
http://www.the-9000.com/images/finder_anomaly.tiff
Any info would be greatly appreciated.

This is a problem that existed for me in Leopard and has not been resolved in Snow Leopard.
Have you filed a bug report with Apple?
http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter/
If not, there's less of a chance they'll know about it and help fix it for you.
Do things look OK from the command line in Terminal?
It would probably be useful to use a tool like Wireshark to check out what each protocol is sending over the wire. That could at least narrow it down to being a client or server issue.
Thanks
--macko

Ierrs on 3C905B over NFS on solaris 8 x86

I have 2 identical Dell PC's, one with Solaris 8 HW 07/01 and one with Solaris 2.6
On the Solaris 8 box, when copying files to local disk over NFS, I get lots of ierrs
on the elxl0 devices and the copy is very slow (NFS server is a netapp with gigabit). FTP
shows no increase in ierrs. The 2.6 box is fine doing the same operation
so I suspect Solaris 8. I've tried my install disks on a Dell pc with a 3C905C card
and thats OK. Here is netstat -ain
Name Mtu Net/Dest Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Collis Queue
lo0 8232 127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 103 0 103 0 0 0
lo0 8232 127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 0 N/A 101 N/A N/A 0
elxl0 1500 172.17.8.0 172.17.8.121 22768 4457 1995 0 0 0
elxl0 1500 172.17.8.0 172.17.8.121 20542 N/A 1992 N/A N/A 0
bash-2.03# netstat -k elxl0
elxl0:
opackets 2557 ipackets 30038 oerrors 0 ierrors 6016 collisions 0
obytes 456750 rbytes 38685177 multixmt 0 multircv 79 brdcstxmt 10 brdcstrcv 3108
unknowns 1908 blocked 0 ex_collisions 0 defer_xmts 77 align_errors 0
fcs_errors 0 oflo 6012 uflo 0 runt_errors 0 missed 0 tx_late_collisions 0
carrier_errors 1 noxmtbuf 0 norcvbuf 0 xmt_badinterp 0 rcv_badinterp 0
intr 24005 xmtretry 0 opackets64 2557 ipackets64 30038 obytes64 456750
rbytes64 38685177 ifspeed 100000000 duplex half media PHY/MII promisc off first_collisions 0
multi_collisions 0 sqe_errors 0 macxmt_errors 0 toolong_errors 0
Help!

Hi Ithieme,
Try with other media. This issue may be your media problem.
Revert back.
Thanks & Regards,
Senthilkumar
SUN - DTS

Write permission over nfs for transmission files

Hi all,
I have a strange problem and I hope you could help me.
Context :
I have a server with :
transmission-daemon to remotely download torrent
pyload to remotely download ddl
nfs server to provide write access over lan for linux clients
samba server to provide write access over lan for windows clients
And of course, a client wich connect to nfs share to manage files .
Problem :
nfs clients have write permission over files created by pyload and basic users of servers but not on transmission files.
otherwise, samba or local basic user have write access on all files (even transmission)
Configuration :
On the server, I have a storage mounted in /mnt/data binded to /srv/nfs4/.
Transmission save files with mask 022 in directory :
/mnt/data/downloads/
Pyload with mask 022 in :
/mnt/data/downloads/ddl/
Nfs give access to /srv/nfs4 with wirte permission :
/srv/nfs4/ 192.168.100.0/24(rw,no_subtree_check)
Infos :
With I know and I tested, I can tell you :
I have 770 (and not 700) permissions on /mnt/data for local users on servers
Permission files should not be the cause. nfs and smbd are owned by root so logically, both of them can write.
Smb clients can write with every permissions (777,770,700) on files
Nfs clients seems have permission of "other". No write with 700 and 770. But write access with 777
pyload files are owned by pyload:pyload
transmission files are owned by transmission:transmission
basic users files are owned by [the_user]:users
So the problem exists only for transmission (not pyload) owned files from nfs client (not samba) and files are the same permissions .. I don't understand.
I will try with more verbose nfs server but I take every idea
Thanks you.
Last edited by xp-1000 (2015-05-01 12:46:00)

The problem could be related to Mavericks permission problems. You can try the Bridge fix:
Open Finder > (go) Computer > Macintosh HD (for me) > Users > Click once on the Home icon (main admin) > Get Info >
click on lock and authorise bottom right > click on cog wheel drop down > click on 'Apply to enclosed items' > OK

Multi Thread Server over TCP/IP

Multi Thread Server over TCP/IP. Does it work?
In my box it works only over IPC protocol.
null

S C Maturi (guest) wrote:
: Mark Malakanov (guest) wrote:
: : Multi Thread Server over TCP/IP. Does it work?
: : In my box it works only over IPC protocol.
: Mark,
: Multi threaded server over TCP/IP will not work with
: the current distribution of Oracle 8.0.5 on Linux.
: This is corrected and a patch would be released soon.
: Maturi
tcp 0 0 bock.nettek-ll:listener bock.nettek-
llc.co:4196 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 bock.nettek-llc.co:4196 bock.nettek-
ll:listener ESTABLISHED
(I have serveral of these)
TNS Ping Utility for Linux: Version 8.0.5.0.0 - Production on 07-
JAN-99 18:45:52
(c) Copyright 1997 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Attempting to contact (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=localhost)
(PORT=1521))
OK (440 msec)
...and from my install log you see that I selected MTS:
-[ YESNO
Q> Would you like MTS (Multi-Threaded Server) configured
and the SQL*Net$
A> TRUE
Please explain? Will TCP/IP MTS work via the loopback adapter
only? So far I have not tried a remote TCP/IP connection.
-STEVEl
null

How can I install Firefox on a server that does not have an internet connection?

I run Firefox on a server to display graphs for a program. I was able to save, upload and install Firefox version 21 on my server because it used the executable installation program. Versions 22 and 23 use a stub program that goes to the internet and installs the program. My server does not have an internet connection, so the stub program does not work. Can I get a copy of the executable program that installs the program without having an internet connection?

hello pkautzman, the full install packets that are capable of an offline installation are available at https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/all/.

Is it possible to boot oracle vm server over iSCSI and ipxe?

Hi,
Is it possible to boot oracle vm server over iSCSI and ipxe?
I have tried it, but got a kernel panic after the boot progress.
Can anyone tell me what should I do to install and or boot oracle vm server on and from a iscsi lun instead a local hard drive?
Thanks!
Redwan

959211 wrote:
Hi,
I have Windows 2008 R2 64 Bit Operating Server Installed.
Other software that are Installed :
1) Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate 32 Bit.
2) Microsoft SharePoint server 2010 64 Bit.
For my development purpose I want to install both oracle 11g client 32 bit and oracle 11g client 64 on the same machine.
Is it possible to install both 32 and 64 bit instance on the same machine.
Thanks
Sambityes, possible; but minor challenge to manage dynamically
how to ensure that you actually use the flavor you desire?

How to install owb server-side software on UNIX Solaris (SPACR-64)?

Hi there,
How to install owb server-side software on UNIX Solaris (SPACR-64)?
I've read the install guide
and it mentions
3. Start the installer by entering the following at the prompt:
cd mount_point
./runInstaller
I don't have access to any graphical interface on the UNIX box e.g. x-windows nor any cd with the software, just the solaris software downloaded from web - does this include the runinstaller
and is the runisnatller just a command line interface?
I hoped I would be able to download the software from oracle website and then simply run the a setup scrip?
Is it possible to do this? Would I simply substitute cd mount_point to cd <directory I put software)
I've never ran oracle universall installer on UNIX before.
Many Thanks
Edited by: user575470 on Feb 15, 2009 7:54 AM
Edited by: user575470 on Feb 15, 2009 8:06 AM

Hi,
You can install the server-side software from the downloaded software.
You don't need the CD
You do need an X-windows client on your computer to connect to the server OR work directly on the server.
Without X-windows you cannot start the Oracle Universal Installer.
Maybe there is a command line installation, I have never used this.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Emile

Is it possible to install Firefox on Windows Server 2008?

I try to install Firefox 3.6 on Windows server 2008 but it says that the file is corrupted.
Is it possible to install Firefox on Windows Server 2008?

From the Parallels website:
32-bit Operating Systems
Windows 8 with: Windows 8, 8.1 (when available)
Windows 7 SP1
Windows Vista SP0, SP1, SP2
Windows Server 2008 R2, SP2, SP1, SP0
64-bit Operating Systems
Windows 8
Windows 7 SP1
Windows Vista SP0, SP1, SP2
Windows Server 2012
Windows Server 2008 R2, SP2, SP1, SP0
I do suggest that you upgrade RAM to at least 8gig
if you haven't already.
FWIW, I currently use Win8/64 bit with Parallels on a 2011 Mini Server
using the windows environment for engineering applications and have
had no issues. I am running Mountain Lion but do not have the
Server app installed.

Firefox 5 or 6 served over NFS to UNIX clients has problem finding shared object libraries.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for