First time flexer long time flasher

Hi im having a bit of trouble getting an xml file that uses
namespaces parsed into my first flex app, the basic structure of
the xml is as follows::
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:IJKGD='
http://www.betadesigns.co.uk/RSS/'>
--------other stufff-------------contianer etc-----
<item>
<title>a title</title>
<description>a description</description>
<IJKGD:grammar>
<IJKGD:grammarID>1</IJKGD:grammar>
</IJKGD:grammar>
</item>
i can get the first two tags into the app ie title and
description however i cant get the< IJKGD:grammar> tag to
display this is the code i have attached to a text box
<mx:TextArea x="20" y="235" width="400"
htmlText="{dgGrammar.selectedItem.IJKGD:grammar.IJKGD:grammarID}"
/>
however this throws up an error:: unfortunately it displays
some characters in chinese dont know why.
Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation
Time Id
2 1084: 应该有 rightparen (在 colon
之前)。 IJKGD.mxml IJKGD line 17
2006年8月6日 0:35:54 59
Any help would be much appreciated thanks in advance

Hi,
I think you have to create a namespace to access that
property
something like
var ns:Namespace = new Namespace("IJKGD", "
http://www.betadesigns.co.uk/RSS");
htmlText.selectedItem="{dgGrammer.selectedItem.ns::grammer.grammerID}"
William Chan

Similar Messages

  • SharePoint 2013 - First load takes long time

    I could be barking up the wrong tree here, but Ive had a continuous problem loading sites for the first time in SharePoint 2013. I've tried multiple warm up scripts, cleared out the cache, increased resources.
    Specs
    SharePoint 2013 Server
    OS: Windows Server 2013
    RAM: 16GB
    CPU: 2x 4cores
    SQL Server 2012
    OS: Windows Server 2013
    RAM: 8GB
    CPU: 1x 4cores
    This server is still in development, so there isn't a lot of traffic going to it.  I opened the Developer Dashboard to try and pinpoint where the latency was coming from.  One process or scope by far takes the longest.
    SPClaimsCounterScope
    Start Time(ms)489
    Duration(ms)6488
    CPU(ms) 6343
    Next would be SPSqlClient which only takes about 1sec. After the WebApplication loads the first time, the performance is fine.  It's just that first time after a reboot, reset, or first thing in the morning. 

    Hi
    There is a 'known issue' with SharePoint's initial load. SharePoint runs on the .Net framework on IIS, which goes to sleep by itself, or in your case an IISRESET restarts all the services.
    Though the IIS services are running, nothing is going on until that first request is made to the website. At that moment, the .Net Framework has to compile all of the DLLs that comprises SharePoint and its features. So the initial load will take a long time,
    and the more features you're using (User Profile, Metadata, etc), the longer it'll take.
    Also following are some of the links which can be helpful
    http://blog.blksthl.com/2013/05/15/sharepoint-2013-page-loads-takes-a-very-long-time/
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/14287.sharepoint-2013-how-to-improve-speed-on-first-page-load.aspx
    Please mark the Answer and Vote me if
    you think that it will help you to resolved your issue

  • Young generation gc some times takes longer time

    jdk: 1.4.2_06
    jvm parameters:
    -Xms2560m -Xmx2560m -XX:NewSize=32M -XX:MaxPermSize=256M -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
    -XX:+UseParNewGC -
    nature of our application is that most of the new objects which are cretaed most likely is going to end up in tenured space so we have kept newsize small.
    Our young gc is frequent but takes vet less time most of the time and it is like this most of the time
    1892801.223: [ParNew 1307000K->1276979K(2621376K), 0.0405279 secs]
    1892803.702: [ParNew 1309619K->1280021K(2621376K), 0.0381812 secs]
    1892810.257: [ParNew 1312661K->1282979K(2621376K), 0.0430851 secs]
    1892813.616: [ParNew 1315619K->1285174K(2621376K), 0.0353861 secs]
    1892820.838: [ParNew 1317814K->1287959K(2621376K), 0.0391169 secs]
    1892825.486: [ParNew 1320599K->1294498K(2621376K), 0.1225365 secs]
    1892825.883: [ParNew 1327138K->1309838K(2621376K), 0.4025240 secs]
    1892832.756: [ParNew 1342478K->1315852K(2621376K), 0.1057747 secs]
    1892838.118: [ParNew 1348492K->1317861K(2621376K), 0.0320176 secs]
    1892843.932: [ParNew 1350501K->1319480K(2621376K), 0.0383975 secs]
    but one or twice in a day it start taking higher gc time for new generation for 2-3 minute till gc happens for old generation
    311536.095: [ParNew 1583769K->1556941K(2621376K), 0.2767211 secs]
    311536.768: [ParNew 1659394K->1638895K(2621376K), 0.5441500 secs]
    311537.638: [ParNew 1671535K->1650538K(2621376K), 0.4639280 secs]
    311538.849: [ParNew 1683178K->1652904K(2621376K), 0.4405431 secs]
    311540.088: [ParNew 1685544K->1659556K(2621376K), 0.4570603 secs]
    311545.027: [ParNew 1692196K->1661921K(2621376K), 0.4514625 secs]
    311547.213: [ParNew 1694561K->1664354K(2621376K), 0.4518378 secs]
    311553.699: [ParNew 1696994K->1666712K(2621376K), 0.4341839 secs]
    311556.270: [ParNew 1699352K->1668499K(2621376K), 0.4293822 secs]
    311559.200: [ParNew 1701139K->1670185K(2621376K), 0.4406644 secs]
    311562.732: [ParNew 1702825K->1672748K(2621376K), 0.4399115 secs]
    311563.772: [ParNew 1705388K->1674850K(2621376K), 0.4561811 secs]
    311568.178: [ParNew 1707490K->1677631K(2621376K), 0.4509551 secs]
    311569.400: [ParNew 171027
    We rarely have Full GC. Mostly minor GC of 2-3 seconds. Once minor GC happens , new generation comes back to .04 sec from .5 sec
    311660.144: [ParNew 1789014K->1758802K(2621376K), 0.4462287 secs]
    311662.122: [ParNew 1791442K->1762257K(2621376K), 0.4457078 secs]
    311662.570: [GC 1762289K(2621376K), 0.0171463 secs]
    311664.142: [ParNew 1794897K->1765945K(2621376K), 0.4635559 secs]
    311666.224: [GC 1771006K(2621376K), 1.6403867 secs]
    311670.893: [ParNew 1492500K->1462823K(2621376K), 0.4980912 secs]
    311672.790: [ParNew 1357566K->1327406K(2621376K), 0.5134905 secs]
    311673.748: [ParNew 1328011K->1303516K(2621376K), 0.4523868 secs]
    311675.227: [ParNew 1239373K->1212039K(2621376K), 0.4482543 secs]
    311677.571: [ParNew 1037272K->1006895K(2621376K), 0.4341042 secs]
    311681.144: [ParNew 584941K->554178K(2621376K), 0.0314600 secs]
    311682.233: [ParNew 586818K->557176K(2621376K), 0.0409105 secs]
    311683.170: [ParNew 589816K->563481K(2621376K), 0.0589575 secs]
    311686.489: [ParNew 596121K->565244K(2621376K), 0.0335869 secs]
    311689.309: [ParNew 597884K->567601K(2621376K), 0.0351472 secs]
    To me it looks like our old generation is fragmented and promotion from new generation to old generation start taking longer time. But once Minor GC happens an dfree up spaces from old generation then we longer sees pauses of .5 seconds every 1 seconds
    I am thinking to increase newsize as well as use following
    UseCMSCompactAtFullCollection
    -XX:CMSFullGCsBeforeCompaction=0
    -XX:-CMSParallelRemarkEnabled
    we haven't used these earlier becasue we thought these are default to these in 1.4.2
    any other suggestion?
    how we can prevent fragmentaion of old space. full gc can adjsu old space but in our case we don't have many full gc's.

    As tschodt indicated, increasing the NewSize as well as
    SurvivorRatio and MaxTenuringThreshold so as to reduce
    the promotion rate into the old generation might help.
    To see if it helps you can use -XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution to
    see if aging objects in the survivor spaces stems the
    tenuring rate substantially or not.
    You may also consider manually setting the CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction
    parameter so as to trigger a CMS old generation collection cycle
    sooner than is the case currently.
    Finally, consider moving to a newer version of the JDK. In particular
    1.5.0_09 (or later) or 1.6.0 (or later) have substantially improved both
    the performance, scalability and "autonomicity" of the concurrent
    collector quite substantially.

  • U00D8 DB Time takes long time after migration

    Hi Guru,
    I have time out error in my background job. i see the status in st03 the DB Time take big time
    Trans/Rep. : ZFISLRR009
    Background Job     Z_ZFISLRR009_TPJOB_DAILY
    1. Steps     1
    T Response Time     3,740     
    Ø Time       3,739,819.0
    T CPU~     5
    Ø CPU~     5,340.0
    T DB Time      1,933
    Ø DB Time 1,932,983.0
    But when I run this job again in the morning it is fine. This error occurred since i migrate my system from Solaris/Oracle 9 to HP-UX/Oracle 10. In the old system with lower spec hardware everything was okay.
    Any idea why it's happened or what database configuration should i consider after migration?
    Any help will be appreciated,
    Thanks,
    Aswin

    Hello Andrea,
    > I see the status in st03 the DB Time take big time
    Yes you are correct, that is your problem.
    > But when I run this job again in the morning it is fine
    Maybe your I/O subsystem is very slow and mostly of the needed buffers are still in the buffer cache or dynamic sampling is done, etc...
    > This error occurred since i migrate my system from Solaris/Oracle 9 to HP-UX/Oracle 10. In the old system with lower spec hardware everything was okay.
    I am quite sure, that the execution plan of the SQL statement(s) has changed. This is not unusual if you upgrade to a newer database release.
    > Any idea why it's happened or what database configuration should i consider after migration?
    Oracle 10g Parameter: Sapnote #830576
    Oracle 10g Patches: Sapnote #1137346
    Oracle 10g Statistics: Sapnote #838725
    I think that these notes are the important ones. If you have done all these things, then you have to go into deeper analysis (as i can see that this is a Z-Report you won't get support by SAP).
    Regards
    Stefan

  • T400 boot time takes long time & has issue with restart

    Not sure if any one has already posted this and got replies...
    my T400 has a strange issue. it takes a lot time in pre-boot... a cursor blinks on the top left corner for 5+ minutes and then loads the 'Windows loading...' screen for about another 5 mins and finally shows the windows logon screen.
    Additionaly, when i hit shutdown, i am fine. if i hit restart - i am sitting there for ever. 
    my laptop has 8GB RAM + 256 GB SSD + Windows 7 Ultimate x64.

    Srini,
    I brought your tweet in and started a new thread and then found you already had a forum discussion going, so I'll just apend to your original thread and will leave this since I tweeted the link back to you to let you know we were taking a look.(Apologies) 
    Does this abnormally long startup of your T400 occur when docked or by itself?  On battery or on AC power?   
    Have you checked the boot device order in BIOS?  Make sure HDD is listed first.
    Are there a lot of applications being loaded in the startup folder?
    Have you tried using the MSCONFIG utility (start -> run ->msconfig) and then selected the startup tab to see what programs are being loaded during boot and if you can uncheck some that you don't always need to load?
    This could reduce your boot time.  I believe this, along with some setting tweaks was suggested in a similar T400 slow boot thread here...
    Perhaps other members will have additional suggestions....
    Mark
    ThinkPads: S30, T43, X60t, X1, W700ds, IdeaPad Y710, IdeaCentre: A300, IdeaPad K1
    Mark Hopkins
    Program Manager, Lenovo Social Media (Services)
    twitter @lenovoforums
    English Community   Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español   Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • Security Groups not being discovered / Talking a long time to be discovered

    Hi All.
    When creating user collections i am creating the majority of them with a membership rule that links directly to a discovered Security Group, so in order for this to happen the security group has to first be discovered by Security Group Discovery Method.
    Ok, what i am seeing is that it is taking a long time, very long time for the security group to appear. At the moment a security group that i am waiting on was created more then 24hours ago and has still not appeared in the All User Groups collection.
    Now this has got me thinking, some of these security groups are created and will not be populated with users from active directory so it is basically an empty security group, the security group that im waiting on to be discovered is empty also...
    So my question... if a security group has no members, does this stop it from being discovered / appearing in All Users Groups collection ?
    If this answer is 'no' then i got to ask some more questions as to what is causing this severe lag in my discovery :-(

    Hi Jason, 
    been trawling the internet and found this.... its dated 2010 so must be referring to SCCM 2007, but could still be relevant.. ???
    5. Active Directory User Discovery
    It discovers the following:
    User name
    Unique user name (includes domain name)
    Active Directory domain
    Active Directory container name
    User groups (except empty groups)
    http://systemcentersupport.blogspot.co.uk/2010/01/discovery-methods-do-what.html
    (just added a user to my 'empty' security group - see what happens)

  • Sending mail take too long time exchange 2011 in iphone4

    when i try to sending mail take too long time.
    stay long time in outbox folder.
    i'm using exchange 2011 in iphone4 with latest updates.

    Hi,
    This is a characteristic of some, but not all, ISPs, and not the SMTP itself. It involves DNS. See:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10391853&#10391853
    Ernie

  • Long time to load a first page, get "the connection has timed out" frequently.

    Frequently takes a long time to get to first page. Even a "speed test" to check my DSL connection. Usually can get to "google.com" quickly but it did come up slow today (just a test for a simple page).
    I have a wireless N router with it's own Firewall (which I didn't want) and I think I've turned it off. Symantec firewall, don't think WinXP firewall is on.
    Tried refresh of Adobe Flash Player per suggestion in this forum, no help.
    Would like to have a tool to see how long each step of getting to the web takes so I can see if there's a bottleneck.
    Occasionally "try again" button works on the "connection has timed out" message.
    My PC is 6 yr old. xp-home, lots of ram, HDD available. Run Symantec AV/MBAM frequently. Ran Housecall and Dr. Web- no problems.
    Talked to my DSL provider and Symantec in depth. Similar lethargy when I get IE running but not as frequent as under FF. Measured my DSL speed - 5MB as promised.
    When the lag occurs, Task Manager does not show FF taking a lot of processor time.
    Have done the things suggested in FAQ to help with performance.
    Also going to bleepingcomputer.com to see if there are suggestions there.
    I'm hoping someone has experienced an analog to this and has a suggestion to diagnose and solve. Thanks - Mike.

    Here's your sign! This is my problem and its solution. Let me know if someone needs help to interpret.
    If you frequently get "connection timed out", go to your ISP and get Manual DNS addresses. Then beat them till they put a real fix on their system.
    Problem is in the DNS server service provided by my DSL provider, Bell South/AT&T. Result of a poor performing DNS is that one can't get thru to the selected site.
    If you do a web search +dsl +"time out" you will see the history with Windstream. THEY finally issues a system-wide fix which, it appears, flattened the issue. Then add +AT&T to see that experience. I did not read it all thru, I'm wasted chasing this problem. I don't give AT&T ANY credit for customer service or heading off problems for their customers on this one.
    AT&T support offers me:
    ==================================== start quote.
    How do I check and update my DNS settings, if my DNS settings are not "server assigned"?
    When you visit a Web site, your browser sends the site's alphabetic domain name to a DNS server. The DNS server translates the domain into a numeric IP address, then responds to your computer with the Internet location of the Web site. Incorrect DNS settings on your computer can disrupt this information flow and cause your Internet browsing to slow down or fail.
    If you have trouble browsing the Internet, check your DNS settings. You likely have your DNS settings as "server-assigned." This allows DNS information to be automatically sent to your computer, which may improve your browsing experience. However, you may need to have your DNS settings manually entered
    Note: If you are using a router to connect to your Internet service, check with your manufacturer's web site for instructions on updating your DNS settings with the following information:
    Primary DNS: 68.94.156.1
    Secondary DNS: 68.94.157.1
    1. Click the Start button and select Control Panel from the menu.
    2. Select Network and Internet Connections.
    3. Double-click the Network Connections icon at the lower right.
    4. Under the LAN or High-Speed Internet section, right-click the Local Area Connection icon and select Properties.
    5. From the "Components checked are used by this connection" list, select Internet Protocol (TCP/IP), then click the Properties button.
    6. Read the current DNS setting on the lower half of the TCP/IP properties screen. If the radio button Obtain DNS server address automatically is selected, you do not need to update your DNS settings. Otherwise, please continue.
    7. Input the new Preferred DNS server of 68.94.156.1 and the Alternate DNS server of 68.94.157.1.
    8. Click OK.
    9. Return to the Network Connections screen. If you have a DSL Connection icon in the Broadband section, proceed to next step otherwise you have completed updating your DNS settings.
    10. Under the Broadband section, right-click the DSL Connection icon and select Properties.
    11. Select the Networking tab.
    12. From the "This connection uses the following items" list, select Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) and click the Properties button.
    13. Read the current DNS setting on the lower half of the TCP/IP properties screen. If the radio button Obtain DNS server address automatically is selected you do not need to up date your DNS settings. Otherwise, please continue.
    14. Input the new Preferred DNS server of 68.94.156.1 and the Alternate DNS server of 68.94.157.1.
    15. Click OK.
    ================================= end quote.
    So it appears I can't put screen shots in here. Well I hope you get the gist.
    In fact this is a bit hosed up.
    It says if you user "automatic dns" you're OK, that's opposite of my experience.
    I changed to the specified DNS addresses and things seem 99.9% fixed.
    I also changed my Router (wireless) settings.
    If there's a survey of my experience here I'll take it.
    Mike Hardy

  • Firefox takes a long time to start, unless I disconnect from the internet first, in which case it starts instantly.

    Whenever I start firefox, it takes an inordinately long time (usually close to a minute, sometimes longer) to start up. i.e. no window, no nothing. In task manager, it shows no activity for cpu, disk, or network activity - it's as if it's waiting for a connection to be made or something.
    If I disable my internet access first, then start firefox, it starts up instantly, and once the internet re-enabled, it works normally.
    Whatever it is doing at initial startup is taking a very long time - couldn't it be done in a separate thread, and let normal startup continue?

    Press the '''<Alt>''' or '''<F10>''' key to bring up the tool bar.
    Followed by;
    Windows; '''Tools > Options'''
    Linux; '''Edit > Preferences'''
    Mac; ''application name'' '''> Preferences'''
    Then '''General.'''
    There are two settings;
    * '''When Firefox Starts'''
    When the browser is started, what page do you want to
    display. Many of us choose '''Show My Home Page.'''
    * '''Home Page'''
    When a new page is opened, what do you want displayed.
    # '''Use Current Page'''. Use what ever page(s) are open at that time.
    # '''Use Bookmark'''
    # '''Restore To Default.''' about:home shows a Mozilla page with tools.
    You can use any of these that you wish;
    '''about:home''' (Firefox default home page),
    '''about:newtab''' (shows the sites most visited),
    '''about:blank''' (a blank page),
    or you can enter any '''web page''' or '''about: ''page''''' you want.

  • Takes a long time to connect to the internet when I first open an app

    I bought my Macbook Pro Retina 13inch last weekend and I love it! Everything was working fine but over the last couple of days, when I first open an app, for example Safari, Google Chrome, iTunes, App Store, anything that requires an internet connection, it takes a long time to load up that first time, but after the first page has been loaded it works again fine until closing the app and re-opening it. When loading the App Store or iTunes it has even said an internet connection is required, even though my connection is fine and the other apps are still loading ok.
    I first thought it was my WIFI connection but I have checked my router and everything seems fine, also my iPad and iPhone are still working fine with the internet.
    Has anyone else had the same problem or can offer me a solution?

    I am getting the same issue, on first starting safari the first page takes an age to load.. once it has everything is fine.
    I have tried the 'Reset Safari' function but no difference. This only happens on my Macbook Pro Retina, Using safari on my iphone or ipad is fine. (I connect via ethernet too so its not a wifi problem.)
    Any one got an answer to this yet?

  • Firefox is taking a long time to open the first time I click on it and also a dialouge box comes up stating firefox is already running, but is not responding, you must close existing firefox process? What is going on?

    After I start my computer in the morning, I go to my email, then I click on firefox, with google as my homepage, it takes a long time for firefox to show up on the computer. It says it is connecting, then when I close firefox, and go to reopen it again, a dialog box opens up that says firefox is already running and I must close existing firefox process first. I have not run into this problem before.

    * The first time you start up any application after turning on your computer is called a cold start, which is why Firefox takes a while to load right away. (I've noticed that future versions of Firefox start up faster on a cold start then Firefox 5.0.1.) Also, a lower amount of RAM could be slowing its start-up down since Firefox is kind of memory hungry.
    * As for the second part of your question, press ctrl,Alt, and the delete keys on your keyboard. The Windows Task Manager should start. Go to the processes tab and look for 'firefox.exe'. Right click on the firefox.exe and click 'End Process'. Hit Yes and wait for a minute.
    * Then opening Firefox again.
    Hopefully this helped somewhat!

  • My husband has a 4s. He hadn't synced phone in a long time. I did the sync on his ipad first, then i phone.  am now missing contacts from iphone. any way to restore back to the way it was b4 I performed sync?

    My husband has a 4S.  He hadn't performed a sync in a long time.  I sync'd his I Pad first, then the I Phone.  His I Phone is now missing quite a few of his contacts.  Any way to retrieve?

    If the iPad and iPhone contacts are being synced with the same supported address book app on the computer, they should now be the same on each device.
    Is Sync Contacts selected under the Info tab for the iPad and iPhone sync preferences with iTunes?
    Which supported address book app on the computer are contacts being synced with?
    Are the missing contacts available in the supported address book app on the computer?

  • Hyperion System 9.3.1 reports taking longer time for the very first time

    We are on Hyperion System 9.3.1. The Financial reports are taking longer time (like 2 to 3 minuter) for the very first time for each login. The subsequest reports are does work faster.
    The behaviour is same for the Production and Development environments.
    All the reporting services have given enough JVM heap size.
    FYI, Reporting and Workspace runngin on the same server. Workspace/Reporting are clusted in two servers. HFM app is running on different server. HFM web is on different server. Shared Services is also on running on different server.
    Any help would be greately appreciated.
    Thanks.

    The reason they run quicker the subsequent times, is because the data has already been cached in the system.
    You could try the usual tricks to speed the report up:
    - move items into POV
    - have children and parent in the same row
    - arrange dimensions in inverse outline order
    - remove excessive formatting
    - push report calculations back to the data source
    We have found that using lots of dynamically calculated members also slows down reports, so try and limit the number of these.
    Hope this helps. If not maybe give us an idea of how the report is created to see if other changes could be made.

  • I have just purchased a subscription of Acrobat XI Pro, which I installed in my computer a long time ago, when I first tried it. Alas, I cannot open the application, which keeps asking me for a serial number I have not yet received. What the hell is going

    I have just purchased a subscription of Acrobat XI Pro, which I installed in my computer a long time ago, when I first tried it. Alas, I cannot open the application, which keeps asking me for a serial number I have not yet received. What the hell is going on?

    [discussion moved to Acrobat Installation & Update Issues forum.]

  • Windows 8.1 first boot time too long

    After Sysprep, windows 8.1 tooks long time to boot, is it normal?
    N.A.Malik

    Hi,
    Generally, when you sysprep an image and deploy it to other devices, it would prepare the device settings, registry update and other computer configuration. This phase would take some time. We call it as specialize and OOBE pass.
    Here we have a metric to assess the first boot time, you can take a look at this guide:
    First Boot Performance
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/jj130825.aspx
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • Phone layout redirect not working - built and hosted on Muse

    Hi, I just added a tablet and phone layout to my Muse built desktop layout. The redirect works fine for the tablet but the desktop version comes up on my smartphone (Android Moto X). The webpage is http://www.elegantperfection.com/ I am hosting with

  • Manager not able to approve leave of the employee on the MSS

    Hi There, When the manager execute the work item on the portal, a run time error occurs on SAP and as discribed on ST22, is caused by function module HR_HK_DIFF_BT_2_DATES which returns a CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW exception. I Think that this functio

  • Batch process makes image resolution change to 72dpi - it should be 300dpi - Help!

    In my work I use a batch process to run an action that converts EPS files to TIFF files. I have been using this successfully in Photoshop 7 on a Win2000 PC for a number of years. The process is as follows... Open EPS file Flatten Image Save Close Whe

  • Link column from an interactive report to insert a row in a tabular form

    Hi, I need your help, i'm new on APEX and i really need to make a "link column" from an "interactive report" to insert a row into a "tabular form". I mean that when you click the "link column" instantly create a new row in the Tabular form with the i

  • Nokia c3-01 calibration!

    I have a big problem with mi device (Nokia c3-01)! I make a software update to the last 07.32 and and now my touch is doesn't work good! When i try to go in the menu it enters in search of wireless! I think if I could get in the menu to the calibrati