Flash movie looks different in some IE8 browsers

Hi All,
I have a website http://www.pestcontrolonline.com which looks fine in  firefox, safari etc, but in some versions of IE 8 or 9 the flash movie looks wrong or doesn't display.  For example the insect guide vertical scroller on the right hand side of the page goes out of alignment with the actual scroller scrolling out the top of the back ground image.
Also on the main page beneath the flash movie that shows the special offers is another flash movie that segments and rotates the image, on some browsers this doesn't show at all.
If the flash movies didn't show in any version of IE then i would assume that there was a problem cross browser wise, but in our office it shows on virtually all of our computers fine, except for two and all computers run the same browser version and connect to the internet via our company server.  I have tried several things including re inserting the flash movies, but nothing really changes.
Any ideas or suggestions would be gratefully recieved.
Thanks
Lee

Altruistic, what happens when you click No? Does the error appear?
I ran the IE8 debugger to see if i could investigate further and I actually did not see the same thing you did.
I ran into problems with 3 things:
jquery.min.js
SpryData.js
It's reporting that certain variables are null or not objects
tabsandaccordions.js
says "object does not support this property or method", referring to this:
     if($.cookie('/careercenter/menustate')) {           $('#menu').accordion('activate', $('#' + $.cookie('/careercenter/menustate')).parent('h3'));      }; 
Again, thanks a lot for pointing me in the right direction. I'm really not sure what is going on. Is this something other than a compatibility issue?

Similar Messages

  • Flash movie looks different in mac vs pc

    I built a flash movie to display products. There are 3 different key frames. Two of them look the same on both mac and pc. Only one looks completely different.
    It works on IE7, IE8, Firefox, and Chrome on PC. Everything looks exactly how it should.
    I tested with Chrome, Safari, and Firefox on a Mac and it looks totall different.
    I am using swfobject.js to embed the file and I updated flash to the most recent version on both machines.
    With a windows computer, it looks like this:
    On a Mac, it looks like this:
    The two New Arrivals are encroaching on the image and there is no product name or item numbers.
    Any thoughts on why this is happening?

    Usually when a browser has an issue playing a Flash file it is due to the embedding code that is used in the html page.  Can you compare your code to another page's code to see what differences there are?  You should let Flash generate the embedding code rather than using some other software to do it if that is what you did.  Just have Flash publkish and html page, test that page in your various browsers, and if it works, copy/paste that code in place of what you have now.

  • Flash movie not showing up in IE8

    Hi,
    I have a flash movie on a login page that shows up fine in every browser apart from IE8 (surprise surprise!), where I just see a red cross in a square. You can see what I mean if you look at the page in IE:
    http://monthlymixup.com/index.php
    Here is the relevant code:
    The movie was created in Flash 10 with ActionScript 3. Does anyone have any suggestions as to why it is isn't working in IE?
    Thanks,
    Nick

    OK, here's the problem. From the time the .swf file starts to download until it is completely downloaded is the flicker time.
    So the browser draws the container, puts the little x inside until the entire .swf is downloaded.
    I verified that by deleting my Temp Internet files cache and while opening the page, monitored the download via ZoneAlarm firewall indicator lights. The empty container is displayed when the download starts, and the .swf is not displayed until the download is complete.
    So to resolve... incorporate a preloader into the .swf or use swfobject.js and provide an alternate image that gets downloaded/displayed first while the .swf is downloaded.
    http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/
    swfobject is also an excellant way to enhance SEO of Flash content.
    Best wishes,
    Adninjastrator

  • Webpages look different on all mac browsers than they do on IE

    Ok, I just purchased an IMAC 27inch and I am not happy. The WebPages I used to do my job on my windows machine worked fine. On my IMAC, they look different, as if part of the page is lying on tope of another part of it, or like the tables used to create the web page are skewed.
    I have tried this on Safari, Firefox and Opera. I went back to the mac store and brought the webpage up on the model in the store and the same thing happen. The sales person downloaded and installed Chrome and there was no change. It did the same thing on chrome.
    Has anyone had a similar problem? WebPages looking different on the IMAC than they do on windows IE? I need to get this figured out fast or I will just take this thing back. I have 11 days left on the 14 day return policy. Help.
    I will try and figure out how to upload a pdf of both WebPages to this thread

    So, is this your first Mac? I remember when I switched over from a PC, I had the exact same issue. Trust me on this one, there is nothing wrong with your computer, it simply takes time to mentally adjust to the differences. It looks as if Safari does not show the complete webpage, or looks as if it is cutoff, or as you said, "skewed." But it is not, your eyes are so used to the IE format and your brain has grown so accustomed to your internet experience being a certain way that it takes time to get used to it. I posted the EXACT same question five years ago in this forum and everyone told me what I am telling you and I got pretty upset with some very knowledgeable people. Now I feel like a fool for having disagreed because I see nothing wrong with it at all, but I am using the same exact computer I was five years ago (I love IMac's, how many PC's can one say that about) You will get used to it, no doubt about it.

  • Quicktime movie looks different in different browsers.  Is there a fix?

    I have an H.264 Quicktime movie (and will be making versions with the Sorenson Video 3 codec, WMV compatible files, and FLV as well), and it looks the way I want it to look in Firefox for Mac and Firefox for Vista. In Safari and Internet Explorer, the blacks are washed out and it looks less saturated (though this is probably due to the image being washed out).
    Is there anything I can do? I know Safari reads color profiles now, but I don't know how to add that to a Quicktime movie, and that wouldn't fix the problem with IE (or, curiously, Firefox on XP). If I drop the blacks enough to make it look good in Safari and IE, it will be too dark for Firefox users. Firefox appears to be the one displaying it "properly" (how it looks in FCP and the stand-alone Quicktime player).

    It is indeed tricky. I've spent a lot of time over the last few months trying to figure it all out and still can't wrap my head around it all. That's due in large part because there's a lot of misinformation out there.
    Thanks for the article. It's interesting because I too set my monitor to 2.2 gamma (sRGB) but for the purpose of working on this project had reverted it to 1.8 (Cinema Display default), and it's been there for a long time now. It is interesting, but it didn't solve my problem.
    My problem is different browsers show a Quicktime differently. Now that I've switched to 2.2, Firefox looks too dark and Safari looks just right (where as before Firefox looked just right and Safari was washed out). Is there or is there not an option to include a color profile with Quicktimes? If not, I'll have to make a compromise, and I'd rather have one that looks great across all high-end monitors (meaning an expensive Dell or Apple monitor on OSX, WXP, and WV).
    Does anyone know what in particular is making the two browsers display Quicktimes differently?

  • Flash movie acts differently on different browsers

    hi
    i have created an online calendar, you can see it on
    this
    link
    this application uses php as well which is called through the
    actionscript
    it works fine on firefox browsers, and some versions of IE,
    the version i have is explorer 7 (which i really dont like), and it
    doesnt work well at all. dont know if it works on safari or other
    browsers, i havent checked it out yet
    (the main problem is trying to write more than one message,
    it isnt displayed on the messageboard on IE)
    does anyone have an idea what the problem could be?
    also if someone sees any problems on different browsers i
    would like to know
    thanks

    "and it doesnt work well at all."
    Is there sometime more specific to describe what is the
    problem?

  • Entire flash movie not playing fully in all browsers

    Hey there,
    I launched a flash site this morning and then discovered
    that the movie isn't playing in it's entirety in all browsers. It
    plays perfectly in Firefox but stops half way in IE and Safari.
    I checked to see if I had any stops in the code but couldn't
    find anyway. When I do a test movie it looks fine.
    Does anyone know why this happens and how to fix it?
    -Stephanie
    URL - www.espavoproductions.com

    I just tried www.espavoproductions.com on all 3 browsers and
    it works fine.
    Is that the url you're talking about?

  • A page ie6 looks different than in other browsers

    The site is www.GigHarborWashington.com
    When viewed in most browsers it renders correctly.  When viewed in ie6 a white border on the right is added with approx 180 pixels.  Additionally, a portion of the image behind the nav bar is repeated and the text on the 3rd image is cut off. I tried adding no-repeat to the areas of question and it created problems in ie7
    I have attached my css file.  Any suggestions on how to repair these problems in ie6 without affecting other browsers?
    Thank you,
    Mike

    Thank you Nancy,
    I am off to a meeting but will work on this later and respond if that was the solution or not.
    Regards,
    Mike

  • Flash movie not displayed correctly in IE 8 on some Windows OS

    Has anyone seen this problem?
    I'm using CS4 to export a basic flash movie with embed tags pre scripted...
    And the issue is that on some OS systems using Vista or Windows 7 and IE 8 as a primary browser, it appears that IE 8 is not displaying the flash banner completely.... its CROPPING it off... This is very strange because the banner works fine in FireFox, IE7,Opera,Chrome but not I.E.8 on some OS systems...
    If you google "Flash not displaying correctly in IE 8" you'll get alot of people with the same issues but no real definate fix...
    Are there any suggestions as to what i could try?
    Do i need different flash embed tags? Or is this a user issue?
    Please Advise as soon as possible...
    Thanks

    I'm sorry, i forgot to explain that I didn't upload the flash published html because it did and produced the exact same results.
    The flash published still got cropped off on 1 vista os(I.E 8) running from a laptop and 1 windows 7(I.E. 8) latop os...
    Its good to hear that you're able to see it clearly... however in my QA efforts, i've been asked to fix the issue or drop the flash banner all together.
    I've tried every which way, i've even converted the embed tags (not uploaded by the way) to a js script and it STILL gets cropped of on 2 ie8 run OS systems...
    And now i'm not sure what else to try on my end.
    I'm currious if because this is an XML driven flash banner, this may be an issue? But it still doesn't explain why some people can see this in IE 8 as you can and others get a cropped banner like in my screen shot sample.
    Again i invite everyone in the forum to take a look at the sample links, as i'd be curious to see who else is seeing this.
    By the way "kglad" Thank you so much... please keep the suggestions coming... but everything you've suggested, i've tried.
    This is very perplexing. Is this a setting issue? or is there some setting on the user side i'm not aware of? Either way, as usual... the flash developer is blamed so i must find a solution.
    Link to flash sample
    http://www.extremefx.net/flashie8issue/flashtest.html
    Link to screen shot sample on a Vista and Windows 7 running IE 8 browser
    http://www.extremefx.net/flashie8issue/ie8issue.jpg
    Again... eagerly await feed back from you and the rest of the forum.
    Message was edited by: RegGFX

  • Automatic scale of Flash movie to fit different screen/browser sizes

    Hi guys,
    I am a mid level Flash user. I have a online portfolio site which I have had running for around 4 years.
    The site at the moment is in its 4th incarnation as I keep growing tired of the layout and design and keep striving to improve it visually. The previous designs have always been at the standard 800x600px or slightly bigger. So when viewed on the majority of different screen sizes and browsers the site was always fully visible at 100%.
    For the latest redesign I've opted for a much larger site size of 1024x768px. This is obviously alot clearer for the user and looks great when viewed on a 19" monitor and above. I for example have a 27" iMac so the site in my opinion looks great.
    The problem I have is when the site is viewed on a smaller screen 17" and below, laptops etc. Due to the size of my Flash site if I view it on a laptop screen the side and bottom scroll bars obviously appear on the browser. I want to know if there is anyway that I can publish the Flash site so that whenever the site is viewed on whatever sized screen or browser it is always seen at 100% without scrollbars.
    I have played about with the publish settings but can't seem to find a way to do this. I have also downloaded SWFFit (Flash Fit) but i'm not sure whether this will do the trick?
    My site can be viewed at:
    www.nineteeneightyone.co.uk
    Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    I was a little confused when you mentioned wanting to "scale" the site and then you mentioned that "the site was always fully visible at 100%".
    Now I understand that when you say 100%, you simply meant that all of the site was visible at the same time... no scrolling needed.
    "whenever the site is viewed on whatever sized screen or browser it is always seen at 100% without scrollbars".
    By this I assume you mean that the site is fully visible? not that you want to view the site at !00%... correct?
    Typically when discussing Flash scaling, 100% mean 100% of the browser window, and has nothing to do with how much of the site is visible inside that window.
    When looking at Flash scaling, there are a number of things to consider, width, height, aspect ratio, and the use/no use of scrollbars.
    Using a size of 1024 X 768 is a good example of a size that will require scrollbars or downscaling in order to display in a Web browser on a  1024 X 768 monitor. A 1024 X 768 will only display about 1000px or less in width and of course with the Web browser address bars etc, a height of 600 or so would be more realistic. So by default, the size requires both horizontal and vert scroll bars when viewed on a 1024 X 768 monitor.
    So what would be required to display the entire site without scrollbars? Well in this case, since only 600 px in height are available, the height has to be downscaled about 78% of the original height... so to maintain the same aspect ratio (the ratio of width to height), then the width was also be downscaled to about 78% or original or about 800 px wide... OK that's fine, but because the monitor is about 1000px wide, there will now be about 100 px unused space on the right and the left.
    By default, Flash likes to maintain that aspect ratio, so that round things stay round and square things stay square. It just means that as you increase or decrease width or height, the corresponding dimension will also change.. decrease height.. and width decreases also.
    Here is an old post that illustrates Flash scaling and how aspect ratio can be maintained or distorted:
    Here are examples of different scaling parameters available in the Publish settings. You can also add these parameters directly in the html (<param name="scale" value="noscale"). All the examples replace the actual Flash dimensions with 100% for both width and height (width="100%" height="100%"). These examples use the old <object> and <embed> to illustrate the different ways to scale Flash. Once you understand how it works I’d recommend that you use swfobject to place the Flash in your final project.
    View the source code for each page to see the full code.
    http://www.cidigitalmedia.com/tutorials/scale/exact_fit.html
    "exactFit" scales the file to fit exactly within the confines of the screen, irregardless if the movie becomes consequently distorted. The original aspect ratio is not maintained. So round things are not round and squares are not square.
    http://www.cidigitalmedia.com/tutorials/scale/noScale.html
    "noScale" is the default setting, and causes the movie to be displayed at the originally designed dimensions.
    http://www.cidigitalmedia.com/tutorials/scale/no_border.html
    "noBorder" causes the movie to be scaled to what ever dimensions are needed to have no border surrounding the movie within the player, which consequently could result in some of the movie being cut off from view. In other words, the movie will maintain the original aspect ratio and will fill the screen completely. But if the movie has to be streched wider to fill both sides of the screen, it will also stretch taller, but then some of the top and the bottom of the movie may be cut off from view.
    http://www.cidigitalmedia.com/tutorials/scale/show_all.html
    "showAll" scales the movie to the size of the screen (which could cause pixelation if the file contains raster information), the difference between showAll and exactFit is that showAll mantains initial movie size proportions. Because it maintains the original aspect ratio, there can be space to the sides or the top and bottom. But everything always shows and they are not distorted. But notice the photo in the center, it becomes pixilated at larger screen resolutions.
    The trickiest part of trying to go full screen is that it’s difficult to make the Flash wider without making it taller also, that is, to maintain the correct proportions or aspect ratio of everything on the stage. These methods are just simple scaling accomplished with html. There are also methods to dynamically scale the stage and it’s elements using Actionscript… but that’s a much more complex undertaking.
    Best wishes,
    Eye for Video
    www.cidigitalmedia.com
    Best wishes,
    Adninjastrator

  • Flash buttons showing differently in browsers

    I just used some simple, built-in Flash buttons (with no
    spaces) for my nav bar in DW CS3. They look great and close
    together in IE 7, but there is a gap between the buttons in Safari
    and Firefox. Any simple explanation? Is it just how different
    browsers render flash/html?
    Thanks,
    Brian

    If you want to use Flash for navigation, consider this -
    1. Some people don't have Flash installed - what do they do?
    Especially
    consider those people who are browsing from a corporate
    internet where Flash
    is not allowed by the IT staff.
    2. Search engines may not parse Flash links - your site will
    not be
    spidered unless you have redundant HTML links
    3. Screen assistive devices don't parse Flash links - what
    will those users
    do?
    4. DW cannot maintain links within a Flash movie, so if you
    move or rename
    a linked file, your navigation will break - what will you do?
    You will have
    to remake those buttons.
    It's usually a very bad idea for these reasons - and for
    these reasons,
    Adobe has removed Flash buttons and Flash text from CS4.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    ==================
    "btr57" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:gmp62v$9c9$[email protected]..
    >I just used some simple, built-in Flash buttons (with no
    spaces) for my nav
    >bar
    > in DW CS3. They look great and close together in IE 7,
    but there is a gap
    > between the buttons in Safari and Firefox. Any simple
    explanation? Is it
    > just
    > how different browsers render flash/html?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Brian
    >

  • Need some advice on how to make this Flash movie

    I have 5 flash movies which are all exported swf files from Camtasia. Now I have to design a Flash movie which has 5 Icons on a blank screen which point to each of these movies. When the user clicks on one movie the exported swf from Camtasia should play and when its finished it shoudl go back to Main Menu page.
    a) Is it possible to include a controllable progress bar for a SWF movie
    I am just looking for advice , like do this and do that. I shall try and write the code myself.
    cheers
    peanutlife.

    You may find the VideoPlayer class helpful:
    http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/fl/video/VideoPlayer.html#includ eExamplesSummary
    There's some sample code there which shows you how to put a video player on a movie and play something.  You would just need to add some buttons and stuff.  That example is Actionscript 3.  Things will be different if you have an older version of Flash.

  • Exported images looking different in different browsers

    I've just published a set of images to my website using a publishing service from Lightroom 5, sRGB. The images look different when viewed in Chrome and Firefox browsers, Chrome looking fine but Firefox displaying them with a red cast. The also display with the red cast in some parts of the OS X Finder but not in Lightroom or Photoshop.
    I've run one of the images through Jeffrey Friedl's online exif viewer and it's telling me there's no colour space metadata or embedded colour profile in the images ( http://goo.gl/Ouqkis). this would make sense as far as the strange colour goes but I thought Lightroom always embedded a colour profile?
    I've had a couple of suggestions that revolve around changing firefox settings but really I just need for the images to work in any browser, without visitors having to care.
    Does anyone have any thoughts
    Sample screen grab, Chrome to the left, Firefox to the right.

    kimaldis wrote:
    Firefox and OS X's Cover Flow view both showed the red cast until this am. Now neither of them do.
    Ah ... hang on, I had a second, wide gamut monitor attached to the computer yesterday, mirrored display. Now it's not. I'd been mostly viewing in the main monitor (Macbook Pro), that was the one that was out and I wasn't checking the second monitor much after uploading. I'm willing to bet that was it. Second monitor affecting colour management on the first .....
    This is what you are seeing and why everything now looks fine on your MacBook's display, which is NOT wide gamut:
    http://www.gballard.net/photoshop/srgb_wide_gamut.html
    Here's a screenshot of an sRGB profile ColorChecker image file with and without the profile in FireFox and Chrome browsers. All four browser images look identical on my non-wide gamut display...what do you see?
          With sRGB Profile embedded                 Without sRGB Profile
    As long as the images are sRGB profile it doesn't matter whether the color profile is embedded or not.

  • Print job looks different in html than it did in Flash preview

    I have created a .swf that contains several movie clips. I have inserted a print button in each movie clip - and managed to get everything in working order on the Flash end of things. Then I inserted the .swf into a new HTML document in Dreamweaver. So far so good - but when I  preview in the browser and hit the print button in one of the nested movie clips, the output looks different than it did when testing it in flash.
    My main .swf has a dark blue background so I used a large white rectangle to act as the background of the movie clips so it would not waste a lot of ink. When I print from the browser, the background is blue and the large white rectangle I see in Flash does not appear.
    This is the first time that what I insert in Dreamweaver doesn't match up with my Flash preview. Can anyone help?

    I'm still not sure why it looked different when inserted into an HTML file. However, I went back into my flash file and changed the document background to white and added a blue rectangle instead of the blue background with a white rectangle in the movie clip for printing - this seems to have solved my problem.
    Thanks to anyone thinking about my problem!

  • AP Div "Moves" in Different Browsers

    (The site in question is at www.yankee-lake.org) In a
    template file, I have a layout table, within the first cell of
    which is a jpg image as my page banner. I want a flash movie to
    "float" above the jpg banner, and appear to be framed by the jpg
    image. I used an AP div to contain the flash movie. If I position
    the AP Div so that the movie is positioned correctly in Internet
    Explorer, then it does not display properly in FireFox, Safari,
    Opera, Camino, Chrome. Conversely, if I position the AP Div to
    display properly in the other browsers, then the movie is not in
    the proper position when viewed in Internet Explorer.
    I think that the problem is that Internet Explorer uses a
    different amount of space between left and top edges of the
    viewport and the first elements of the web page, than the other
    browsers. And, since the AP div is absolutely positioned within the
    viewport, I get this anomalous behavior. But, I don't know how to
    fix it.
    If I use relative positioning, then I don't know how to
    "layer" the movie to float above the banner graphic.
    Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide.
    Brad

    The AP Div is not moving. It's the rest of your content that
    is moving.
    Add this to your CSS -
    body { margin:0; padding:0; }
    and then locate the Flash div as desired.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    ==================
    "LinkDoctor" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:gd89tv$lqu$[email protected]..
    > (The site in question is at www.yankee-lake.org) In a
    template file, I
    > have a
    > layout table, within the first cell of which is a jpg
    image as my page
    > banner.
    > I want a flash movie to "float" above the jpg banner,
    and appear to be
    > framed
    > by the jpg image. I used an AP div to contain the flash
    movie. If I
    > position
    > the AP Div so that the movie is positioned correctly in
    Internet Explorer,
    > then
    > it does not display properly in FireFox, Safari, Opera,
    Camino, Chrome.
    > Conversely, if I position the AP Div to display properly
    in the other
    > browsers,
    > then the movie is not in the proper position when viewed
    in Internet
    > Explorer.
    >
    > I think that the problem is that Internet Explorer uses
    a different amount
    > of
    > space between left and top edges of the viewport and the
    first elements of
    > the
    > web page, than the other browsers. And, since the AP div
    is absolutely
    > positioned within the viewport, I get this anomalous
    behavior. But, I
    > don't
    > know how to fix it.
    >
    > If I use relative positioning, then I don't know how to
    "layer" the movie
    > to
    > float above the banner graphic.
    >
    > Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide.
    >
    > Brad
    >

Maybe you are looking for

  • Open a txt file in a real time PXI target

    I want to open and read a txt file when targeting to a PXI, running a real time OS. The file is saved in a specific directory of the real time machine. When I run the typical Labview (version 7.1) examples there is alwasys an error message.

  • Deprecated Class

    I am attempting to 'import com.borland.jbcl.layout' but java now doesn't recgonise this statement. I am trying to use the XYLayout method, but without the correct libarie it won't work. So does anybody know what it's been updated with? Any help would

  • [solved] Thunar: no automount for removable hard drives

    USB flash drives are automatically mounted by thunar-volman. However, removable USB hard drives are not. These are the settings of thunar-volman: http://i.imgur.com/24mHHSs.png In order to mount removable USB hard drives, I have to manually click on

  • Need help with a simple prime number output program

    ok, the teacher asked for a program to output the first 90 prime numbers and i have been able to do that so far. but now he is asking for the numbers to be printed in a grid of columns and rows. specifically 9 across and 10 down. im stumped. what sho

  • Ni reports crashes with large amounts of data

    I'm using labview 6.02 and am using some of the Ni reports tools to generate a report. I create, what can be, a large data array which is then sent to the "append table to report" vi and printed. The program works fine, although it is slow, as long a