FM SWW_WI_ADMIN_CANCEL takes time to execute

Hi All,
I have used FM SWW_WI_ADMIN_CANCEL in a report to logically delete workitems. When i execute the FM through SE37 it completes execution within seconds. However when i execute the report , time taken for execution of the FM is very high ( almost 3-4 minutes for a single workitem).
Please advise how this issue can be fixed.
Thanking you in anticipation,
Chinmay

You should post this in the workflow forum and not in this one. This one is for SRM related issues. You can find the workflow forum [here.|SAP Business Workflow;
Regarding your problem, I don't think it is a problem with the Fm but with the workflow. Search here on SDN for a document on upgrading from 4.6C to ECC for workflow. There are some actions which should be performed I think.
Regards,
Martin

Similar Messages

Query takes time to execute

I am creating a jsp application . . . .I am retreiving some values from my database oracle 10g..my query taking time to execute even in isql plus..am uisng tomcat5 and oracle 10gR2..can anyone pls tell me why it happens...my query fetches data from four tables...i dont know exactly why its taking so muc time say 50seconds...when i run the application in my local host it retrievs fast when i do that in server it creates a problem..
Actually it works fine when i deployed in my client server it takes time sometimes it takes atmost one minute
1.pls tell me how can i test my query about the performance
2.is der any command in oracle to test
3.how much bytes it takes

Look at this thread...
When your query takes too long ...

Query takes time to execute. Review this query and give me a possible quere

SELECT DISTINCT A.REFERENCE_NUMBER
FROM A,B,C
WHERE DF_N_GET_CONTRACT_STATUS (A.REFERENCE_NUMBER, TRUNC (SYSDATE)) = 1
AND ( B.CHQ_RTN_INDICATOR IS NULL AND B.CHALLAN_NUMBER IS NULL
AND C.INSTRUMENT_TYPE IN (1, 2) AND C.MODULE_CODE = 5 )
AND ( A.HEADER_KEY = B.HEADER_KEY AND C.HEADER_KEY = B.HEADER_KEY);
This query takes 3 minutes to execute. I want to improve the performance so that it can execute with in seconds.
Table A has 10 lakhs record.
Table B has 3.7 lakhs record.
Table C has 5.3 lakhs record. Consider DF_N_GET_CONTRACT_STATUS as function. REFERENCE_NUMBER is the type of Varchar2(20).
Plz give me a correct logical and fastest execution query for the same.
Thanks in advance.

I would agree with the post from Santosh above that you should review the guidelines for posting a tuning request. This is VERY important. It is impossile to come up with any useful suggestions without the proper information.
In the case of your query, I would probably focus my attention on the function that you have defined. What happens if the condition using the DF_N_GET_CONTRACT_STATUS function is removed? Does it still take 3 minutes?
SELECT reference_number
from (
SELECT DISTINCT A.REFERENCE_NUMBER
FROM A,B,C
WHERE ( B.CHQ_RTN_INDICATOR IS NULL AND B.CHALLAN_NUMBER IS NULL
AND C.INSTRUMENT_TYPE IN (1, 2) AND C.MODULE_CODE = 5 )
AND ( A.HEADER_KEY = B.HEADER_KEY AND C.HEADER_KEY = B.HEADER_KEY)
where DF_N_GET_CONTRACT_STATUS(reference_number, trunc(sysdate)) = 1;Of course, the query above really depends on the cardinality of the returned data..... which is impossible to know without following the posting guidelines. This query could return anywhere between 0 rows and 2x10^17 rows. And in the latter case evaluating the function at the end wouldn't make any difference.
Also, do you really need the distinct? Does it make any difference? Most of the time that I see distinct, to me it either means the query is wrong or the data model is wrong.

Auto scaling takes time to execute the rules

Hi,
I am using the windows azure application. In that I am using the scaling feature provided into the azure portal. Here, I have configured the rule to scale up my web role instance by 1 if CPU load increases up to certain limit. and the reverse rule that for
decrementing the role instance.
However, I tried to increase my system load. and checked the scaling feature. So, here I observed that the rules gets satisfied to auto scale the role instance by 1 but it took around 12-15 min to execute it.
NOTE: I have set the rule checking time duration to 5 min.
Please help me.

Thank you for your response.
But I guess this will not solve my problem. Let me elaborate my problem in detail.
I have a site hosted on azure environment. To make the site performance better we are doing some research out of that one attempt we did is the performance test. So in that we are increasing the load on our site to check how it works with heavy user load.
And we observed that when web roles CPU usage goes beyond 50% then we gets lower response from our site. So get the better performance we have used the scaling feature from azure portal. and configured the rule that if CPU usage goes beyond 50% then scale
up the web role instance. Here, we observed that when CPU usage goes beyond 50% at the same time scaling doesn't triggered and we got lower response from our site and then after 12-15 min scaling rules got executed and at that time CPU usage was around 70%
but the triggered in auto scaling was for the 50% condition. In short we are experiencing delay in executing rule. Please help.

Count (*) for select stmt take more time than execute a that sql stmt

HI
count (*) for select stmt take more time than execute a that sql stmt
executing particular select stmt take 2.47 mins but select stmt is using the /*+parallel*/ (sql optimer) in that sql command for faster execute .
but if i tried to find out total number of rows in that query it takes more time ..
almost 2.30 hrs still running to find count(col)
please help me to get count of row faster.
thanks in advance...

797525 wrote:
HI
count (*) for select stmt take more time than execute a that sql stmt
executing particular select stmt take 2.47 mins but select stmt is using the /*+parallel*/ (sql optimer) in that sql command for faster execute .
but if i tried to find out total number of rows in that query it takes more time ..
almost 2.30 hrs still running to find count(col)
please help me to get count of row faster.
thanks in advance...That may be because your client is displaying only the first few records when you are running the "SELECT *". But when you run "COUNT(*)", the whole records has to be counted.
As already mentined please read teh FAQ to post tuning questions.

Procedure takes long time to execute...

Hi all
i wrote the proxcedure but it takes long time to execute.
The INterdata table contains 300 records.
Here is the procedure:
create or replace procedure inter_filter
is
     /*v_sessionid interdata.sessionid%type;
     v_clientip interdata.clientip%type;
     v_userid interdata.userid%type;
     v_logindate interdata%type;
     v_createddate interdata%type;
     v_sourceurl interdata%type;
     v_destinationurl interdata%type;*/
     v_sessionid filter.sessionid%type;
     v_filterid filter.filterid%type;
     cursor c1 is
     select sessionid,clientip,browsertype,userid,logindate,createddate,sourceurl,destinationurl
     from interdata;
     cursor c2 is
     select sessionid,filterid
     from filter;
begin
     open c2;
     loop
          fetch c2 into v_sessionid,v_filterid;
          for i in c1 loop
               if i.sessionid = v_sessionid then
                    insert into filterdetail(filterdetailid,filterid,sourceurl,destinationurl,createddate)
                    values (filterdetail_seq.nextval,v_filterid,i.sourceurl,i.destinationurl,i.createddate);
               else
                    insert into filter (filterid,sessionid,clientip,browsertype,userid,logindate,createddate)
                    values (filter_seq.nextval,i.sessionid,i.clientip,i.browsertype,i.userid,i.logindate,i.createddate);
                    insert into filterdetail(filterdetailid,filterid,sourceurl,destinationurl,createddate)
                    values (filterdetail_seq.nextval,filter_seq.currval,i.sourceurl,i.destinationurl,i.createddate);
               end if;
          end loop;
     end loop;
     commit;
end
Please Help!
Prathamesh

i wrote the proxcedure but it takes long time to execute.Please define "long time". How long does it take? What are you expecting it to take?
The INterdata table contains 300 records.But how many records are there in the FILTER table? As this is the one you are driving off this is going to determine the length of time it takes to complete. Also, this solution inserts every row in the INTERDATA table for each row in the FILTER table - in other words, if the FILTER table has twenty rows to start with you are going to end up with 6000 rows in FILTERDETAIL. No wonder it takes a long time. Is that want you want?
Also of course, you are using PL/SQL cursors when you ought to be using set operations. Did you try the solution I posted in Re: Confusion in this scenario>>>>>>> on this topic?
Cheers, APC

Query takes large time to execute

Hi,
These are interview questions:
1. If the query takes lot of time to execute, what should be the preliminary analysis done by a DBA
2. If we have system, users, rollback and temporary tablespaces, 2 disks disk1 and disk2, how should the tablespaces be distributed on the disks
I am interested to know the answers. Kindly respond
Thanks and Regards
Sumit Sharma

2. If we have system, users, rollback and temporary tablespaces, 2 disks disk1 and disk2, how should the tablespaces be distributed on the disks
2 disk are not enough for a good distribution but however you could the best possible with that.
Really the optimal distribution of disk must be so:
DISK1: Tablespaces of data, One Controlfile, Redo Logs ( 1 member per group )
DISK2: Redo Logs ( 1 member per group ), One Controlfile
DISK3: Tablespaces for Indexes, Redo Logs ( 1 member per group ), One Controlfile
DISK4: Archives, Rollback Segments
Joel Pérez
http://otn.oracle.com/experts

How to debug a background task that takes a lot of time to execute

My workflow consists of a background task which takes a significant amount of time to execute completely. I have executed the BO method from SWO1 and it works fine.. takes just few secs to execute.
But when this method is executed through workflow as a background task, it takes more than 20 mins to execute.
What can be the possible causes and how do I debug this.

Dear Tiyasha,
You can debug your task even if it is a back ground task.
The process is as follows :
The place where want to place your break point put an infinite while loop just before your actual code.Now execute your workflow , now go to sm54 there u will find your entry and from here you can go to the debugger .In the debugger make the value of the while loop to be true so that u can proceed.
Here u will able to debug it properly.
Regards,
Geet

Urgen!! Query takes lots of time to execute and the production is in effect

Hi,
We have some data loading script. This scripts takes lots of time to execute. As Iam new to tunning please do let me know what is the wrong with the query !!
Thanks In advance
Query:
=========
INSERT /*+ PARALLEL */ INTO ris.ris_pi_profile
(ID,COUNTRY_OF_CITIZENSHIP,IMMIGRATION_STATUS,SSN,DOB,GENDER,
ETHNICITY,RACE,DEPARTMENT,DIVISION,INSTITUTION_ID,INST_EMAIL,EFFECT_DATE,ACADEMIC_TITLE,ACADEMIC_POSITION,
OTH_PER_DATA,PCT_RESEARCH,PCT_TEACHING,PCT_CLINICAL,PCT_ADMIN,PCT_OTHER,PCT_TRAINING)
SELECT
ap.id,
p.citizen_cd,
decode(p.visa_cd,'CV',0,'F1',1,'H1',2,'H1B',3,'H2',4,'J1',5,'J2',6,'O1',7,'PR',8,'PRP',9,'TC',10,'TN',11,'TNN',12),
(select n.soc_sec_num from sa.name n where n.name_id = p.name_id),
(select n.birth_date from sa.name n where n.name_id = p.name_id),
(select decode(n.gender_cd,'F',1,'M',2,0) from sa.name n where n.name_id = p.name_id),
(select decode(n.ethnic_cd,'H',1) from sa.name n where n.name_id = p.name_id),
(select decode(n.ethnic_cd,'A',2,'B',3,'I',1,'P',4,'W',5) from sa.name n where n.name_id = p.name_id),
a.dept_name,
a.div_name,
a.inst_id,
(select n.email from sa.name n where n.name_id = p.name_id),
a.eff_date,
ac.acad_pos_desc,
p.acad_pos_cd,
0,
p.research_pct,
p.teach_pct,
p.patient_pct,
p.admin_pct,
p.other_pct,
p.course_pct
FROM
appl1 ap,
sa.personal_data p,
sa.address a,
sa.academic_pos_cd ac,
profile_pi f
WHERE
p.project_role_cd='PI'
and ap.appl_id=f.appl_id
and p.appl_id=f.appl_id
and p.name_id=f.name_id
and a.addr_id=f.addr_id
and p.acad_pos_cd=ac.acad_pos_cd
AND EXISTS (select 1 from ris.ris_institution i WHERE i.id = a.inst_id)
AND EXISTS (select 1 from sa.academic_pos_cd acp WHERE acp.acad_pos_cd = p.acad_pos_cd);
In the execution PLan I see lots of Nested loop, Hash Join
Index( Unique scan)
Table Access by ( Index rowid)
This query is fast in Test DB but ver very slow in prod DB. Need your help Urgent.
Minaz

When your query takes too long...
When your query takes too long ...

Query take more time to execute

Hi
I am using in sql select statement two non exist statements it is taken more time to execute the query ,non exist is any impact query performance
thank's

[email protected] wrote:
I am using in sql select statement two non exist statements it is taken more time to execute the query ,non exist is any impact query performanceI have a query that is using even more time to execute. Do I win?

Taking long time to execute views

Hi All,
my query is taking long time to execute(i am using standard views in my query)
XLA_INV_AEL_GL_V , XLA_WIP_AEL_GL_V -----these standard views itself taking long time to execute ,but i need the info from this views
WHERE gjh.je_batch_id = gjb.je_batch_id AND
gjh.je_header_id = gjl.je_header_id AND
gjh.je_header_id = xlawip.je_header_id AND
gjl.je_header_id = xlawip.je_header_id AND
gjl.je_line_num = xlawip.je_line_num AND
gcc.code_combination_id = gjl.code_combination_id AND
gjl.code_combination_id = xlawip.code_combination_id AND
gjb.set_of_books_id = xlawip.set_of_books_id AND
gjh.je_source = 'Inventory' AND
gjh.je_category = 'WIP' AND
gp.period_set_name = 'Accounting' AND
gp.period_name = gjl.period_name AND
gp.period_name = gjh.period_name AND
gp.start_date +1 between to_date(startdate,'DD-MON-YY') AND
to_date(enddate,'DD-MON-YY') AND
gjh.status =nvl(lstatus,gjh.status)
Could any one help me to execute it fast?
Thanks
Madhu

[url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=501834&tstart=0]When your query takes too long...

Stopping a Query taking more time to execute in runtime in Oracle Forms.

Hi,
In the present application one of the oracle form screen is taking long time to execute a query, user wanted an option to stop the query in between and browse the result (whatever has been fetched before stopping the query).
We have tried three approach.
1. set max fetch record in form and block level.
2. set max fetch time in form and block level.
in above two method does not provide the appropiate solution for us.
3. the third approach we applied is setting the interaction mode to "NON BLOCKING" at the form level.
It seems to be worked, while the query took long time to execute, oracle app server prompts an message to press Esc to cancel the query and it a displaying the results fetched upto that point.
But the drawback is one pressing esc, its killing the session itself. which is causing the entire application to collapse.
Please suggest if there is any alternative approach for this or how to overcome this perticular scenario.
This kind of facility is alreday present in TOAD and PL/SQL developer where we can stop an executing query and browse the results fetched upto that point, is the similar facility is avialable in oracle forms ,please suggest.
Thanks and Regards,
Suraj
Edited by: user10673131 on Jun 25, 2009 4:55 AM

Hello Friend,
You query will definitely take more time or even fail in PROD,becuase the way it is written. Here are my few observations, may be it can help :-
1. XLA_AR_INV_AEL_SL_V XLA_AEL_SL_V : Never use a view inside such a long query , becuase View is just a window to the records.
and when used to join other table records, then all those tables which are used to create a view also becomes part of joining conition.
First of all please check if you really need this view. I guess you are using to check if the records have been created as Journal entries or not ?
Please check the possbility of finding it through other AR tables.
2. Remove _ALL tables instead use the corresponding org specific views (if you are in 11i ) or the sysnonymns ( in R12 )
For example : For ra_cust_trx_types_all use ra_cust_trx_types.
This will ensure that the query will execute only for those ORG_IDs which are assigned to that responsibility.
3. Check with the DBA whether the GATHER SCHEMA STATS have been run atleast for ONT and RA tables.
You can also check the same using
SELECT LAST_ANALYZED FROM ALL_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'ra_customer_trx_all'.
If the tables are not analyzed , the CBO will not be able to tune your query.
4. Try to remove the DISTINCT keyword. This is the MAJOR reason for this problem.
5. If its a report , try to separate the logic in separate queries ( using a procedure ) and then populate the whole data in custom table, and use this custom table for generating the
report.
Thanks,
Neeraj Shrivastava
[email protected]
Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:02 PM
Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:03 PM

It takes time before the system is working properly

Hi,
This morning something strange happened.
Turn on the iMac, the chime is there but when using the audio control keys (F4-F15-F16), nothing happened.
Trying to quit an application (like iMail) from the dock does not work either.
The icon in the dock shows the selected view but the options above the icon are not shown.
For your info: the audio is working when using iTunes.
But after waiting for a few minutes, the system is back to normal: the options above the iMail icon are shown and the audio control window is shown as well.
For some reason, the system needs a few minutes to get back to normal.
It performs the selected actions but they are delayed.
Additional information:
- The permissions are o.k.
- No external DVD writer or hard disk has been connected
- USB connected equipment: EyeTV, cardreader
I have rebooted, restarted the systems a few times and it goes wrong in most of the cases.
Here is the system log for a case where it goes wrong.
Anyone?
Could the problem be caused by the error message at 12:38:32?
Apr 27 12:38:31 iMac-Rob shutdown: reboot by Rob:
+Apr 27 12:38:32 iMac-Rob SystemStarter[210]: authentication service (219) did not complete successfully+
+Apr 27 12:38:33 iMac-Rob SystemStarter[210]: The following StartupItems failed to properly start:+
+Apr 27 12:38:33 iMac-Rob SystemStarter[210]: /System/Library/StartupItems/AuthServer+
+Apr 27 12:38:33 iMac-Rob SystemStarter[210]: - execution of Startup script failed+
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: hi mem tramps at 0xffe00000
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: PAE enabled
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: 64 bit mode enabled
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: standard timeslicing quantum is 10000 us
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: vmpagebootstrap: 512847 free pages
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: migtable_maxdispl = 71
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Enabling XMM register save/restore and SSE/SSE2 opcodes
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: 90 prelinked modules
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: ACPI CA 20060421
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement: ready
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: AppleACPICPU: ProcessorApicId=0 LocalApicId=0 Enabled
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: AppleACPICPU: ProcessorApicId=1 LocalApicId=1 Enabled
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: using 10485 buffer headers and 4096 cluster IO buffer headers
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Enabling XMM register save/restore and SSE/SSE2 opcodes
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Started CPU 01
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: IOAPIC: Version 0x20 Vectors 64:87
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: ACPI: System State [S0 S3 S4 S5] (S3)
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Security auditing service present
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: BSM auditing present
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: disabled
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: rooting via boot-uuid from /chosen: 706A03DF-BE50-44AC-82DB-D23B5D479191
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Waiting on <dict ID="0"><key>IOProviderClass</key><string ID="1">IOResources</string><key>IOResourceMatch</key><string ID="2">boot-uuid-media</string></dict>
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: USB caused wake event (EHCI)
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: FireWire (OHCI) Lucent ID 5811 PCI now active, GUID 0019e3fffe89003a; max speed s400.
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Got boot device = IOService:/AppleACPIPlatformExpert/PCI0@0/AppleACPIPCI/SATA@1F,2/AppleAHCI/PRT2 @2/IOAHCIDevice@0/AppleAHCIDiskDriver/IOAHCIBlockStorageDevice/IOBlockStorageDri ver/WDC WD2500JS-40TGB0 Media/IOGUIDPartitionScheme/Customer@2
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: BSD root: disk0s2, major 14, minor 2
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: CSRHIDTransitionDriver::probe:
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: CSRHIDTransitionDriver::start before command
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: CSRHIDTransitionDriver::stop
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: IOBluetoothHCIController::start Idle Timer Stopped
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Jettisoning kernel linker.
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Resetting IOCatalogue.
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: display: family specific matching fails
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 0
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Matching service count = 1
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: Previous Shutdown Cause: 3
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: display: family specific matching fails
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: wl0: Broadcom BCM4328 802.11 Wireless Controller
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost kernel[0]: 4.170.46.5IPv6 packet filtering initialized, default to accept, logging disabled
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost mDNSResponder-108.6 (Jul 19 2007 11: 41:28)[32]: starting
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost memberd[40]: memberd starting up
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost DirectoryService[45]: Launched version 2.1 (v353.6)
Apr 27 12:39:00 localhost lookupd[44]: lookupd (version 369.6) starting - Sun Apr 27 12:39:00 2008
Apr 27 12:39:02 localhost kernel[0]: yukonosx: Ethernet address 00:17:f2:da:0f:96
Apr 27 12:39:02 localhost kernel[0]: AirPort_Brcm43xx: Ethernet address 00:1b:63:14:3b:be
Apr 27 12:39:02 localhost launchd: Server 331f in bootstrap 1103 uid 0: "/usr/sbin/lookupd"[44]: exited abnormally: Hangup
Apr 27 12:39:02 localhost kernel[0]: Registering For 802.11 Events
Apr 27 12:39:02 localhost kernel[0]: [HCIController][setupHardware] AFH Is Supported
Apr 27 12:39:02 localhost diskarbitrationd[39]: disk0s2 hfs 9A0A53D7-98B5-3116-8E2B-08011F0C72BF Macintosh HD /
Apr 27 12:39:02 localhost kernel[0]: IOBluetoothBNEPDriver: Ethernet address 00:19:e3:ef:d4:33
Apr 27 12:39:02 localhost lookupd[63]: lookupd (version 369.6) starting - Sun Apr 27 12:39:02 2008
Apr 27 12:39:03 iMac-Rob configd[36]: setting hostname to "iMac-Rob.local"
Apr 27 12:39:03 iMac-Rob configd[36]: bootpsessiontransmit: bpf_write(en2) failed: Operation not permitted (1)
Apr 27 12:39:03 iMac-Rob configd[36]: DHCP en2: INIT transmit failed
Apr 27 12:39:03 iMac-Rob /System/Library/CoreServices/loginwindow.app/Contents/MacOS/loginwindow: Login Window Application Started
Apr 27 12:39:04 iMac-Rob loginwindow[66]: Login Window Started Security Agent
Apr 27 12:39:04 iMac-Rob kernel[0]: AppleYukon - en0 link active, 100-Mbit, full duplex, symmetric flow control enabled
Apr 27 12:39:06 iMac-Rob configd[36]: executing /System/Library/SystemConfiguration/Kicker.bundle/Contents/Resources/enable-net work
Apr 27 12:39:06 iMac-Rob configd[36]: posting notification com.apple.system.config.network_change
Apr 27 12:39:06 iMac-Rob lookupd[96]: lookupd (version 369.6) starting - Sun Apr 27 12:39:06 2008
Apr 27 12:39:07 iMac-Rob kernel[0]: netsmb_dev: loaded
Apr 27 12:39:08 iMac-Rob mDNSResponder: Adding browse domain local.
Apr 27 12:39:08 iMac-Rob configd[36]: target=enable-network: disabled
Apr 27 12:39:09 iMac-Rob kernel[0]: smbfssmbqfsattr: (fyi) share 'NTFS', attr 0x2b, maxfilename 255
Apr 27 12:39:09 iMac-Rob kernel[0]: smbfs_aclsflunksniff: sm_args.uid 501, error 2

Mac_Robban wrote:
Could the problem be caused by the error message at 12:38:32?
Apr 27 12:38:31 iMac-Rob shutdown: reboot by Rob:
+Apr 27 12:38:32 iMac-Rob SystemStarter[210]: authentication service (219) did not complete successfully+
+Apr 27 12:38:33 iMac-Rob SystemStarter[210]: The following StartupItems failed to properly start:+
+Apr 27 12:38:33 iMac-Rob SystemStarter[210]: /System/Library/StartupItems/AuthServer+
+Apr 27 12:38:33 iMac-Rob SystemStarter[210]: - execution of Startup script failed+
It looks like that message comes immediately after you tell it to restart, so it's not related to your problem. I see those same lines in my log, anyway. The actual reboot comes with the next line, at 12:39:00...
As for the slowdown, do you have an external file share turned on that mounts at startup? I see a mention of an SMB mount called "NTFS" in your log. That can slow things down a lot, especially if it's not available.
Also, things are a bit slower right after a reboot. For example, when you launch a program for the first time after a reboot, it takes quite a bit longer. But once it's been launched once, it'll launch much faster after that. Also, lots of things are going on in the background, even once the Finder desktop comes up. If you have a lot of applications listed in "Login Items" in your "Accounts" preferences, those take time (and more important, CPU time) to start up, too.
Also, see if things speed up if you remove the EyeTV and card reader. Maybe they're starting a process that's taking a lot of CPU time...
charlie

Java Stored Procedures take longer to execute

Hi,
I am doing a comparison of Oracle and Java Stored procedures in terms of execution time. I have created a java stored proc and an Oracle stored proc both of which perform the same task. Upon execution, I find that the java proc takes longer time to execute.
I have the following qs:-
Why are Java Stored Procs slower than Oracle Stored Procs?
How is a java stored proc executed as compared to an Oracle Stored Proc?
Can someone give a detailed explanation of -
- how a java stored proc is stored in the database?
- what happens when it is executed?
Thanks in advance
Nusrat

Why are Java Stored Procs slower than Oracle Stored Procs?java program slower than native code! hold the front page!
On second thoughts don't bother.
Cheers, APC

GUI update problem: button take time to be disabled

I have a Stop button. In the actionPerformed() method for the button, I disable the button and also some other buttons (using setEnabled(false)) then there are some other codes that include Thread.sleep() method. Then again I enable some other buttons. Problem is the Stop button take time to be disabled. The time exactly equals sec provided in the sleep() method. I tried by puting the button disabling buttons' code in another thread that is called from SwingUtilies.invokeLater() method just before the sleep() method. It is very important to disable some buttons before Thread.sleep() is called. And only after the sleep() method I can enable some other buttons.
Please help me.

Hello Experts! I can't hear you. 1) Swing related questions should be posted in the Swing forum
2) Quit bumping your question, you only posted it 30 minutes ago. People will answer when they have the time.
Your code in the actionListener needs to be executed in a separate Thread, so that when you invoke the "sleep" method the separate Thread sleeps, not the Event Thread.

FM SWW_WI_ADMIN_CANCEL takes time to execute

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for