Form Field Display Only

Is there anyway within ADDT to specify a form field that is input on insert but display only on update? Marking the field read-only makes it so for both. I would like to let the user input the data, not be able to change it, but still see it for reference.

If I understood correctly you want to allow the user to input data on insert but only be able to see the field value on update. You can make a form field available on insert/update/or both and have it display as text (so that the user can see if for reference but not be able to change it) by clicking on the Manage Dynamic Form wizard icon in the Developer Toolbox bar and changing the corresponding settings.
<br />These options however don't cover your scenario as you want the field to be editable on insert only. I tried tweaking the generated ADDT code but it didn't work. The only other way to do this that I can think of would be to add the read-only attribute dynamically, that is on update only. The code to add to the field would simply be:
<br /><%If Request.QueryString("ID") <> "" Then Response.Write("readonly='readonly'")%>. This code simply checks to see if a record ID is being passed to the dynamic form page and if it is then we know we're on an update page so the readonly field attribute is added (I code in VBScript so the code might be slightly different in your case).

Similar Messages

  • How can i get the order form to display only those fields selected by user?

    Hi everyone,
    I'm a newbee so please bear with me.
    I would like to create an interactive form in a multi-page format. I would like to display our fifty odd products, divided into 5 different categories. The client browses through these pages then selects those that he wants to buy.
    The interactive order form at the end should display only the client’s choices along with the Total purchase order.
    In short, a little like a on-line catalogue and cart/basket that we see while buying online.
    Now, I've created my pdf brochure, and I have the order form on page 12-13 at the end with the subtotal, Vat and Total ...all that's fine. My only problem is I want the order form to display only those items selected by the user and not the entire list of items as shown in my current order form.
    Have a look at my pdf here http://www.upperside.fr/vijee/mpls09ex/EXHIBITOR%20SPECIAL%20ORDERS2010.pdf
    Can someone please help me/guide me to the right resources that I need to look up to achieve my end result.
    Thanks a lot in advance.
    Vijee

    The poster already posted at the Acrobat Users Community, Interactive Forms that sums up a client order from catalog. The sample form posted to Acrobat.com was a revision of the sample form that came with Acrobat 4.0. There are some fairly advance scripts, templates, and document level functions involved with this form.

  • How do i create a multirecord Form for Display only.

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a multirecord form for display only.
    The form is based on one table only so when i try to create
    it using based on a Table or view i get the option of Tabular or
    custom.
    So if someone has faced or worked on a similar problem of creating
    multirecord form pls do reply.
    Thanks,
    Amit.

    Hi
    You can check this one. The previous link in turn points to this.
    Re: .NET application works OK on infrastructure, but has problems on midtie
    Thanks,
    Sharmila

  • Custom infotype - issues with conversion class - making fields display only

    Hi,
    I created the custom infotype 9008 using t-code PM01, created conversion class ZCL_HRPA_UI_CONVERT_9008_XX and assigned it to screen structure ZHCMT_BSP_PA_XX_R9008 in the view V_T588UICONVCLAS. Coded the methods IF_HRPA_UI_CONVERT_STANDARDOUTPUT_CONVERSION and IF_HRPA_UI_CONVERT_STANDARDINPUT_CONVERSION. I'm trying to make some fields display only within the method OUTPUT_CONVERSION dynamically. Coded the check class ZCL_HRPA_INFOTYPE_9008 with business logic.
    Everything seems to be working fine when I test using the test tool through t-code PUIT_UI.
    When I try to create/modify 9008 record through PA30, the code in the methods OUTPUT_CONVERSION  and INPUT_CONVERSION is never getting executed. The control is not coming there at all. The fields are allowing input. Any idea why this is happening.
    We are on ECC 6.0 and at service pack level SAPKE60035. Couldn't find any relevant SAP notes as well.  Appreciate your help in this regard.
    Thanks,
    Kumar.

    Hi Venkata,
    Check this document.
    This explains about custom infotype creation.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60a7586d-edd9-2910-68a8-8204303835a1?overridelayout=true
    regards,
    Brinda L

  • PO - GL Account Field - display only

    Hi,
    Please could you advise on the options for making G/L Account field display only in ME21n?
    I think there are probably a few ways of doing it which I am investigating, but would like your opinion and advice if possible.
    Thanks in advance.
    As always - points up for grabs!

    Hi,
    Hope you are doing cost center accouting with account assignment K while creating PO
    Then go to MM --> Purchasing --> Account assignment --> Maintain account assignment category _-> Select cost center K --> Change view account assignment details you can
    make G L account as mand or optional or display or hidden.
    Check this out please if it helps you.
    Best regards,
    Sridhar

  • How to make form field read only for users with certain permissions

    We need to make two form fields read only for users with certain permissions. Kindly guide me on how to do this in Infopath. I searched and there is an option to disable to the column, but no option to select user permissions. 
    Please give your suggestion on this. 
    thanks.

    Hi,
    See the link below:
    http://info.akgroup.com/blog-0/bid/69277/InfoPath-Restrict-visibility-to-users-in-a-SharePoint-Group
    Here you can add the fomatting action on the field to disable the field if those users belong to certain Sharepoint group (does not matter the permission levels though). Hope it helps.
    Regards, Kapil ***Please mark answer as Helpful or Answered after consideration***

  • ML81N Make FM fields display only in account assignment

    Requirement is to make FM fields already derived from PO (derivation working correctly) display only or add an error message. Easy I thought just go to config for SES and click on Additional Fields display only (Cost Center?, WBS element? there was no funds management fields available)...then after some time investigating
    Have debugged the transaction and found some possibilities.
    (1) BADI TR_GET_ACCNT_ASSIGN called in function FM_ACCOUNT_GET_COBL from MS_ACCOUNT_ASSIGNMENT.
    (2) User Exit EXIT_SAPLFMCH_001 called in function FM_CHANGE_AA_SUBST
    (3) Use FMDERIVE to somehow check the PO derivation
    Just wondered if anyone had taken this further before I spend a lot more time understanding the whole process in order to achieve a small bit. Please I am a technical resource not FM specialist.
    If I could understand the process flow, at least it might help me make quickest simplest solution.
    thanks,

    Hi,
    You can customize the field status in tx OME9 for the relevant account assignment category.
    But be aware that this customizing will be valid for all purchasing documents and transactions - not only for ML81N and the services area.         
    During SES postings, inheriting the FM account assignment from the reference PO is the standard and expected behaviour, so you may see that FMDERIVE is not called when the PO reduction is to be posted during ML81N. Instead, the FMAA is read from table FMIOI and fmderive is skipped in those lines (fi transaction keys KBS/WRX, for instance).
    I hope this will help you
    Kind regards
    Mar

  • Make fields 'Display only'

    Hi
    I have default u2018dep key u2018  &  u2018useful life u2018 in the system. Now I need to make these 2 fields 'display only' in master data.  How can I do it?
    Thanks
    Ava

    Hi
    In AO21 you may not have 'Display' option, but you remove the check under 'Mn No' for these two fields. then they would be only in display at master level. Since we tell the system that maintenance would only be at asset class level
    Thank You,

  • Form field displaying but not in session state

    I have a form which displays data depending on node selected in a tree. The data displays ok and allows me to update but If I try to access a value ( I want to filter a select list ) its empty.
    Displaying all session values reveals that only the primary key of the form is held in sessikon state. I have set the value I want to read to 'Display as Text ( saves state )'
    Regards
    Seán

    I have 2 regions, a tree and a form. The form was created with the wizard and I added the tree afterwards.
    The tree nodes are links which branch to the same page and set the value of the primary key field .
    I've copied the event view of the page below...
    Page Rendering
    Process: After Header Fetch Row from ALL_COST_CENTRE (#OWNER#:ALL_COS..)
    Region: Tree Page Template Body (3) (1,20)
    Admin Tree
    Tree: 11210417299635529
    (50) P8_TREE_ROOT [Hidden]
    Region: HTML Text Page Template Body (3) (3,10)
    Office Details
    (10) CANCEL Location: Template Close
    (30) SAVE Location: Template Change
    (1) P8_COST_CENTRE [Display as Text (saves state)]
    (10) P8_NAME [Display as Text (saves state)]
    (15) P8_OFFICE_TYPE [Display as Text (saves state)]
    (30) P8_DIST_PARENT [Select List]
    (40) P8_ADMIN_PARENT [Select List]
    Region: HTML Text Page Template Body (3) (3,40)
    Administration
    No computations
    Page Processing
    No computations
    Validation: P8_NAME not null (Inline+Notification) sequence: 10
    Process: After Submit Process Row of ALL_COST_CENTRE (#OWNER#:ALL_COS..)
    Process: After Submit reset page (8..)
    Go To Page: f?p=&APP_ID.:8:&SESSION.&succe (After Processing) sequence: 1 Unconditional

  • Adobe form in display only

    Hi expert,
    we have developed an adobe form for the workflow for invoice but it can change we want it to be in display only When it get the the customer. PLEase help.when the customer receive the invoice He is able to make change on the invoice
    Regards,
    Flavien
    Edited by: Flavien Gagoum on Feb 26, 2009 10:30 AM

    Hi Flavien Gagoum 
    In Adobe form, there are two types of forms are available.
    1. Static (Which can not be changed)
    2. Interactive (Which can be chaged, and we can make some / Many fiels disabled)
    So for your case, try to use Static form, hope you have used interactive form.
    Thanks and Regards
    Balaji K.

  • ME22N - Make fields display only.

    Hi gurus,
    I have the following requirement I don`t know how to solve so well...
    We´ve created a new purchase order type and we need a little special behaviour for it.
    At creation (ME21N) all fields must be ready for input, in the same way that the other PO types.
    However, in modification (ME22N) we need some fields unavaible for input, just display.
    This fields are: Payment Terms (At header level) and Delivery Date (At Position level).
    I've trying some user-exits, but I havent found the way to implement this behaviour.
    Because of that, I`ve trying to let the fields available for input in ME22N and check values at save, showing a message in case of changes. Could anybody recommend me which user-exit use for this verifications?
    Once again, a lot of thanks!

    Hi Ole,
    Did you tried screen variants.Please check this lik want to make few fields as display only in ME21N Check this and tell if need more hlep in this.
    Regards,
    Madhu.

  • Single Record Form: fields display with the wrong width

    I'm laying out fields on a single record form and notice that the width of the fields displayed when I run the form is less than the width I specify on the "Edit Page Item" page. Here are 3 examples:
    field 1: Display as=text, Width=100, Maximum Width=100, ==> displayed width=76
    field 2: Display as=text, Width=50, Maximum Width=50, ==> displayed width=46
    field 3: Display as=textarea Width=100 Maximum Width=100 ==> displayed width=100
    Anyone know why this is happening? I'm trying to layout the form so that it has a pleasing look. It's hard to get the fields lined up when they don't display according to the widths specified.
    Edited by: Corvette Captain on Aug 9, 2012 3:21 PM

    Hi,
    >
    I'm laying out fields on a single record form and notice that the width of the fields displayed when I run the form is less than the width I specify on the "Edit Page Item" page. Here are 3 examples:
    field 1: Display as=text, Width=100, Maximum Width=100, ==> displayed width=76
    field 2: Display as=text, Width=50, Maximum Width=50, ==> displayed width=46
    field 3: Display as=textarea Width=100 Maximum Width=100 ==> displayed width=100
    Anyone know why this is happening? I'm trying to layout the form so that it has a pleasing look. It's hard to get the fields lined up when they don't display according to the widths specified.
    >
    Setting the Width of the Page Item sets the input elements "size" attribute. HTML rendering based on size attribute is not a precise as you need. You should use CSS for precision. See Compatibility Notes
    Cheers,

  • Adobe Form field display based on user

    Dear Friends
       I am creating one form. which has the three fields :
       1) Telephone:
       2) Email:
       3) Portal Id:
       My work scenario is when form reaches via workflow to Telefone person he / she only can enter data in the telephone field where he / she cant enter data in email and portal id field and this for all the fields like email guy has access to enter data only in  email and portal will be for portal id,  except concern person's field all other fields become read only.
    I have design the form and successfully trigger it via UWL as well. but all the field are allow to enter data as i dont know how to controll them. I have the role in my bsp's controller do_init method but dont know how to utilize this info to set as read-only for non concern users.
    Is ther any way to achieve this please tell me how I can achieve this functionality. your any help will be appreciated.
    Thanking you
    Regards
    Naeem

    Dear Chintan
       Thank you very much for your reply.. i incorporated your solution in following wat
    ---------data.#subform[0].TextField3::ready:form - (FormCalc, Client)-------------------------------
      <---- this is the line two and column 1
    if(ROLE1 == "TEL")               //form1.page1 - indicates you form hierarchy so change it accordingly.
        form1.page1.phone.access = "open";
        form1.page1.email.access = "readOnly";
        form1.page1.portal.access = "readOnly";
    else if (ROLE1 == "EMAIL")
        form1.page1.phone.access = "readOnly";
        form1.page1.email.access = "open";
        form1.page1.portal.access = "readOnly";
    else if(ROLE1 == "PORTAL")
        form1.page1.phone.access = "readOnly";
        form1.page1.email.access = "readOnly";
        form1.page1.portal.access = "open";
    I am receiving the following error at line 2 and column 1
    " Script Failed ( language is FormClac;contex is xfa[0].form[0].data[0].#subform3[0].textField3)
    Error syntax error near token '{' on line 2 column 1. could you please tell me where i m making mistake.
    I am not using the sub-form.
    for your information what I am doing is:
    I have 7 input fields:
    Form receives the values for the following fields from the BSP Page controller (do_request).
    field 1 pernr ( read only)
    field 2 emp_name (read only)
    field 7 role1 (invisible)
    by this function module
    call function l_name
        exporting
          /1bcdwb/docparams  = fp_docparams
          pernr = emp_id
          emp_name = emp_name
          role1 = role1
        importing
          /1bcdwb/formoutput = fp_result
        exceptions
    Form fields which properties need to be set on role
    Field3 Telephone
    Field4 Mobile (same as telephone and optional so not important)
    Field5 Email
    Field6 Portal
    I have use the code on the above 4 fields.
    Please help me to rectify the error I ll greatly appreciate your reply.
    Thanking you
    Regards
    Naeem
    Edited by: Naim Khan S Babi on Oct 8, 2009 4:13 PM

  • Quantity field display only in ME52N

    Dear Experts,
    Our requirement is to restrict any change in PR qty through ME52N.
    I have done the changes in field selection group ME52, but still the field is not in display mode.
    Kindly siggest what all field selection groups involved when ME52N transaction is executed.
    As per my understanding;
    I checked AKTV-Optional,ME52-Display and NBB-Mandatory...result should be display but the result is still optional.
    Also as per rule combination of display field with any other mode results display only(except suppressed).
    Is it getting overruled through hard coded standard programs...kindly advise.
    Regards

    SAP-MM wrote:
    Dear Experts,
    > Our requirement is to restrict any change in PR qty through ME52N.
    > I have done the changes in field selection group ME52, but still the field is not in display mode.
    >
    > Kindly siggest what all field selection groups involved when ME52N transaction is executed.
    > As per my understanding;
    > I checked AKTV-Optional,ME52-Display and NBB-Mandatory...result should be display but the result is still optional.
    >
    > Also as per rule combination of display field with any other mode results display only(except suppressed).
    > Is it getting overruled through hard coded standard programs...kindly advise.
    >
    > Regards
    hi,
    please change in me52n not in me51.
    and come to me52n 
    select other purchase requsion
    given your requsion number  and click on change / display option  then it displiedin change mode
    Thanking you.

  • Anyone seeing form field display glitches in Safari 6?

    Things like text that disappears as you type (but it's really still there) in heavily styled form fields. Might be a CSS issue. It seems to crop up after running the app for several hours and can be helped by restarting.

    From your Safari menu bar click Safari > Preferences then select the Privacy tab.
    Click: Remove All Website Data
    Quit then relaunch Safari.

Maybe you are looking for