Formula Needed to bring back last Case Comment related to a Case

Post Author: angiecreese
CA Forum: Formula
I am having trouble pulling the LAST Case Comment. I created a report to show me all open cases by Account and then created a sub-report pulling in the Case Comment Date and the Case Comment. I only want it to pull in the latest Case Comment and not all of the comments per case.
Can someone please help. A tech guy offered this but I don't understand the formula he's saying to use??
u201CCreate a subreport that pulls in all the comments for the case number. Then do a filter on the MAX date or time stamp for that comment date.u201D
Any help is greatly appreciated!!

Post Author: sharonmtowler
CA Forum: Formula
in the subreport you need to retrieve the maximum date, that will show you the most recent case. there is a date stamp that you will need to create a formula from.
create a group by case id, then place the case date and comment in the details. use the summary wizard to create a MAXIMUM formula by date grouped on the case id. this will show you the last recent case date by the case id. you will have to surpress the data either by section surpression or group selection. record selection wont use a formula. make sure you join the sub report by case id.

Similar Messages

Verizon needs to bring back the games on demand

why did verizon take away the games on demand they need it back

It's possibly due to a lack of uptake or licensing, but I'll let someone from Verizon chime in officially. It looks like they've transferred control to a 3rd party per: http://games.verizon.com/do/gameList?genre=-1
========
The first to bring me 1Gbps Fiber for $30/m wins!

Green Screen - need to bring back a small portion of clothing

I shot some video against a green screen and the talent wore a green shirt under a black jacket. It is only a small portion of what she was wearing and the shirt never touches the green screen. Is there a way to only ultra key contiguous green or a way to bring her shirt back in after it is keyed out. It is only about a 30 second video and not a lot of movement.
thank you

It sounds like you did it the right way. Or, rather, the easiest, most common way.
It is possible to take the video, mess with the levels until you get all black or white, and use that as a mask. If you reduce the mask a bit you can avoid messing up any edges.
The advantage of that is that you don't have to keyframe. But that only works with some video. If there are soft edges like hair it won't work very well. But for clothing it is usually OK. Sometimes the movement is so radical that creating a mask out of the video itself can be a real time saver.

Apple needs to bring back the month preview on IOS7 calendar.

Am I the only one who finds this a not very well thought out move? The preview is so helpful! Instead of going into each day and looking at the individual appts/events, it was so much easier to look at a month, tap a day and it would show a list of all appts/events for that day while still displaying the whole calendar. It is something small but I think it should be added back in.

http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone

Check voided in error...need to bring back

Hello,
We voided a check in error and want to re-instate it? Is this possible?
Linda

Hi Ravi,
Thanks for your message. We would like to not create a new check number...we would like to use the original check number because it was voided by mistake and subsequently cashed.
I tried to use FCHG to change the check status of the original check, but this didn't work because I can't reset and reverse the "reversal" document that offset the payment document.
The check register still shows the original check as being voided.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Linda

Bring back the 12 month devise installment plan.

You need to bring back the 12 month devise installment plan. I am grandfathered into the unlimited data plan and do not want to give it up, so the edge plan is out of the question. I cannot afford to pay full price for a phone and accessories. the installment plan helped me tremendously in my purchase of a new devise withOUT, changing my plan and coming greatly out of pocket. HELP!!!
I have been a VZW customer for more than 12 yrs. The devise installment plan, unlimited data plan that I have and great service, are just a few of the reasons i an still with VZW. Please remain competitive and re-offer this service.

Who cares what my data plan is? Has nothing to do with my opinion on unlimited data. I could of had it. Chose not to, didn't need it. Still don't. I use maybe 500 MB per month.
The point is Verizon wants to get rid of it. And has been getting rid of it piecemeal for years. My point is if they are going to do it, just do it. Like pulling a band-aid off. You just rip it off you don't try to finesse it. Just dumping it gets rid of all the 'How can I still get a discounted upgrade" threads also gets rid of the "Verizon tricked me into giving up unlimited data" threads.
Will people get mad? yes.They get mad now. What's the difference? Heck offer them 10 GB per line bonus for 2 years for each unlimited data line as a gesture. The ones that leave likely use the most data and that will actually help if they left.

Bring back Visual Basic 6.0 ! We all need it.

Please reconsider introducing VB6 to the market. It is needed by many.

Hi Reed,
Thanks for your two posts. Let me try to reply.
Discussion or Argument ?
You say "these forums are for discussions not arguments", and suggest that I want an "argument" or I am "trolling".
Yes they are for discussions and no it isn't the case that I want an argument (or that I am trolling). I am trying to have a reasoned discussion following the opening poster's genuine request to "Please reconsider introducing VB6 to the market. It is needed
by many."
I don't consider you treated him fairly. You have some sort of administrative status on this forum, implicit in that is that you should treat all posters equally and fairly. Yet your first post was "Bring back Windows 3.11, we need it. ......VB6 should
be retired and forgotten." That post alone was unfair to the OP and it set the tone for other posts that followed.
In other posts you refer to "VB6 zealots" but never criticize those who oppose the return of VB6 even when they accuse posters of being someone else. (I'm not making a plea for more banning and more censorship, I'm asking that everyone be treated
equally).
You also say "At the end of the day it is a fool's errand to argue with fools, so there's little sense to continuing the 'discussion'". Hardly fair and equal treatment, and certainly not an encouragement of discussion rather than argument.
You also state "If this thread were meant to take itself seriously, it would have a title which was not so obviously false, and it would contain some content with a reasonable argument." Again, the opening post was clearly a genuine call. You may
not agree with it but that is no reason to call it 'obviously false'.
Also the opening post doesn't even refer to VB.NET, it certainly doesn't suggest that VB6 should replace VB.NET - it is others who bring VB.NET into the argument. (And yet you move it to 'Off-topic posts' on the grounds it is not VB.Net related).
Let me state I am putting this forward as my genuine opinion of your actions, I am not attempting to 'troll', 'flame' or to attack you personally.
Valid arguments for VB6
You say Cor has clearly demonstrated there are no valid arguments for keeping VB6 around. Not so.
First of all the OP says "it is needed by many". Why should your and Cor's opinion be any more important than the OP's ?
Here are some reasons it is needed (I limit myself to just 5 otherwise this post will be huge):
1) VB6 is still widely used. According to the TIOBE index it is the #7 most popular programming language - an amazing feat for a language last updated 16 years ago. Particularly as Microsoft (& others) have spent 12 years trying to kill
it off. You may not like it, but there it is.
2) There are still a huge number of legacy VB6 applications in use, especially in corporates and government. Microsoft have (to their credit) recognized this and offer "it just works" support for the VB6 runtime until at least 2023 (soon to be extended).
But this support is for the runtime, not the IDE.
Microsoft effectively offer 2 options for these VB6 applications
a) If no modifications are required, continue running the VB6 application (presumably Cor disagrees with Microsoft).
b) If modifications are needed, migrate to VB.NET.
But in real life the most likely scenario is that the VB6 application will require a minor modification.
So what do you do ? According to Microsoft you migrate. But if the modification is just to change (for example) some text on a form that would be nonsense. I saw a suggestion a while ago that it cost $1 for every 3 lines of code migrated. So
a medium sized VB6 application could cost say $20,000 to migrate. Clearly that is not an acceptable cost for the minor modification I suggested. (Don't get hung up on actual cost figures, I am just pointing out there are potentially significant
costs involved).
The obvious answer for this scenario is to use VB6 (at a cost of say $20 not $20,000). Yet Microsoft don't offer this, stating that the VB6 IDE is not supported on Windows 7 or 8.
Does anyone disagree that doing minor modifications in VB6 is the only acceptable solution in this scenario? Or are some going to suggest it is better to spend $20,000 than $20 ?
Microsoft have painted themselves into a bit of a corner here, stating that they support unmodified VB6 applications until 2023, but you can't (theoretically) modify them.
For completeness on this point I'll cover some other typical scenarios too:-
One is that the VB6 program needs to become a web application - effectively this is then a re-write not a migrate, so you can decide what language is best to use. It may be, for example, that JavaScript/HTML5 is the way to go. (I've followed this route myself
for some old VB6 apps).
Another is that the VB6 application needs a mobile version. A few years ago that may have been VB.NET for Windows Mobile. (I've done that myself too, great for Windows CE/Windows Mobile 6.x). But doing this today you are really looking at iPhone,iPad
and Android - again you can choose the best approach (native or web app ?) and language.
The final scenario I'll mention is the one Microsoft do cover - migrate your desktop VB6 app to desktop VB.NET. I can't think of any occasion in the last few years where I have found a genuine need to do this. I have certainly seen cases where
IT (or whoever) have decided that VB6 apps must be migrated because VB6 is 'obsolete' (I guess a view not too dissimilar from many in this forum). I've even done a few of these myself (though I had the sense to only do smaller migrations, not wanting
to tie myself up with large scale migrations). I don't think of any of these new applications (done by myself or others) were any better than the ones they replaced, but at least the customers were happy (and paid well).
3) VB6 is the same language as VBA. VBA is a current, Microsoft supported language. It is in Microsoft's flagship product Office 2013. And it is the same language as VB6. You can cut and paste code between VB6 and VBA (and vice-versa). It is the same
language.
Both VB6 and VBA use the Visual Basic Runtime Library. In fact it is more than that, VB6 actually uses VBA to define it's language. In effect the VB6 IDE is a host for VBA in the same way that Word or Excel are hosts.
It is strange that Microsoft support (and sell and extend) the language when it is named VBA but not when it is named VB6.
Microsoft say VBA will be supported for the foreseeable future stating "This means that if you have an existing VBA project that you are satisfied with, you can be confident your investment is safe". Where is the logic in having this for VBA but not VB6
They assure you your VBA investment is safe but won't give the same assurance for your VB6 investment.
(OK, for the more pedantic posters VB6 is the same as VBA6. VBA7 is the latest release and includes a handful of modifications to support 64 bit Windows. Prior to VBA7 the languages were kept identical, it is these same modifications that many
of us now would like to have incorporated into an updated VB6).
4) A suggestion to bring back an improved version of VB6 is the fifth most popular (out of almost 8,000) on the Visual Studio UserVoice site. Vote
for VB6
5) Microsoft's program manager for Visual Studio stated (Channel 9) "It isn't cost effective to keep rewriting code to get back to functional equivalence". Quite so. So why re-write existing VB6 applications ? (Again, Cor presumably disagrees).
General Points
You mention LightSwitch and SmallBasic. A good point. But I'm sure you know neither support VB6 code so it doesn't address the concerns of the OP. But it is nice to see that you aren't opposed to all languages that aren't called 'VB.NET'.
So why the opposition to an updated VB6 ? If you prefer, it could be named LightSwitch 6.1 rather than VB6.1 ? Or maybe SmallBasic 7.0 ? Or if you see VB6 as a threat to VB.NET you could name it VB Junior. As long as it can open and compile VB6
code that's fine by me. Incidentally, there is certainly no call for VB6.1 to be part of "the .Net family".
You say "you want these hard working people to DO MORE WORK so that you can continue to generate income from your ancient endeavors." I'm not sure I see your point here. How is asking for Microsoft to bring back VB6 (together with the modifications
they have already done for VBA7) doing that? I suspect Microsoft could do this for a fraction of the money they have wasted on LightSwitch or SmallBasic. And if it is going to be more work than Microsoft can handle (as if) they should open source
VB6.
You mention that your 8 year old website is 'crap'. Well, that's what happens with websites. But the analogy doesn't really hold for a typical VB6 desktop program. A desktop CRUD program written in VB.NET doesn't really look (or behave) any different
to the same program in VB6.
You ask what I will be doing in 5 years when nobody uses PCs anymore ? Well who knows what the future will bring, but it is likely to be VB6 for those (mainly corporate) users still using desktops and laptops or Windows tablets, JavaScript for
Web apps - including iOS and Android - (I note Microsoft are recommending JavaScript/HTML5), and something (maybe Basic4Android ?) for native Android apps if Android phones and tablets become more acceptable for corporate users. I'll probably
also be migrating my VB.NET apps to JavaScript too.
As things stand, Microsoft have sent a clear message: 'If you are planning to make a substantial investment in developing your software, if your application is mission-critical, if you expect to use it for years to come - don't use Microsoft languages.'
Have Microsoft learnt from this ? The killing of Silverlight would suggest not.

Bringing back hub/mb/cas server

Exchange 2010 sp3, 1 DAG, Win2k8 r2 sp1
2 MB, 1 hub main site
1 MB/CAS/hun DR site
for a long time, the Exchange server in DR site has been offline because of no available disk space. now that both the Exchange servers in main site and DR site have the same hd size for the mailbox database, i'm planning on bringing back the DR site Exchange
server.
problem is, the DR site Exchange server have the previous configurations in terms of mailbox database names, sizes. the main site Exchange servers have different database names, sizes. but both have the same drive letters.
question is, when i bring online the DR site Exchange server, how can i make it sync with the new configurations from the main site Exchange servers? should i delete the old mailbox databases in the DR site first, do a file level copy of the mailbox databases
from the main site, and then restart Exchange?

If your database is that large, your best bet for adding a second copy is to use external storage, as you suggest. However, in order to do this, you are going to need to freeze the database so it doesn't change during the time you are copying the database
and placing it onto your second server. To do this, you need to add the second database copy (without seeding it - using "Add-MailboxDatabaseCopy -SeedingPostponed" - this will save the log files necessary for the database
copy until it is available to add them) before you start copying your database files, and you will need to copy your database files while the database is offline - you can bring it back online once you have copied it. I am going to guess
that you don't have the storage necessary to host your log files for an extended time period (more than a week), so you will need to copy the database and get it placed on the second server in a very short time period in order to complete this before your
log drive is full. And if you have a lot of churn in your database, those transaction log files are going to take a very long time to copy across your WAN link so they can be read into the database copy.
An alternate solution you may consider, which won't require that the database be copied manually to the new server, is to add a new mailbox database with copies on both servers, then to move mailboxes into this database. This will allow you to grow the database
gradually, allowing the passive copy to keep up to date with the active primary. You can move the high priority mailboxes to this database first, moving to mailboxes of lower importance over time.
I'll add a final note - if you add your database copy on the weekend, you may be able to seed it across your WAN. My calculations show that this should take less than a few hours (easily less than half a day), which may be much faster than if you attempt
to copy the database to a USB device and transport it to the second datacenter. That WAN connection is going to be saturated while this copy goes on, which is why I recommend doing it on a weekend.

Bring back Amply/Fade and other comments

Hi,
Please bring back Amplify/Fade.
Here is my workflow:
When I record concerts (I frequently combine audio with video, but this is not necessarily the case), I need to cut audio CDs. After cleaning up the audio files and applying affects (EQ, etc.), I use track markers to delineate where song tracks begin and end. I then use Amply/Fade with the Fade Out option on small sections where the song ends. Of course, if the beginning of the song has a beginning that is abrupt to the point of being jarring, I can use a Fade In option. After fades have been applied, I switch to CD mode and burn the selected tracks to CD. One of the great things about Amply/Fade is that one gets consistent results every time. Drag fading (available for the beginning and end of clips) might be "fun", but I regard it as more difficult to apply consistent results.
The fact that the CD burn functionality is missing from CS 5.5 really restricts my ability to give CS 5.5 a fair audition. I think that CS 5.5 sounds better than AA 3 (and this is really important to me if this attribute carries through to the finished product), but the final proof is in listening to the finished product. Yeah, I can burn in AA 3 or by using some other product, but I have doubts as to whether I revert to AA 3 for burning, I am losing the improved sound qualities)..
Back to Amply/Fade...I accept, to some degree, the need to release this rewritten product without all of its previous functionality. So, part of my evaluation process was to see how well CS 5.5 records and if its effects were not sufficient for me, to use it as a shell for third-party VST plugin effects. My reasoning is that, possibly, it would be more productive and might be somewhat cost effective to stay with Audition than switch to another DAW. While Ozone 4 appears to work with CS 5.5 (it shows, although I have yet to test it), some other VST plugins erroneously are disabled.
Suggestions:
If possible, publish a roadmap for your customers, in terms of what features you plan to reintroduce and when they should reappear. I realize that I risk sounding arrogant with a request like this, but at least for me, 12 to 18 months waiting for a "maybe" is just too much. It would be good if interim releases could restore at least some missing functionality before CS 6. Also, before the release of CS 6 (maybe this was done for CS 5.5), evaluate the product in terms of beta user reaction to the feature set.
Final thoughts:
It would be good if you could post a compelling features list. I have roughly 27 or 28 days left on my trial. It's obvious that many useful features are missing. Rather than spending the remaining time puzzling over missing features, I would prefer to spend my time gushing over how CS 5.5 would be a great addition to my tools. Yes, the performance seems a little faster and it plays nicer with my current audio interface, but from the point of testing basic features, the speed doesn't matter. And, in the end, it's quality of results and ability to adopt an easy workflow that matters. The non-modal dialog design is welcome. In itself, however, it's not enough.
Thanks,
Steve

Hi RY,
I can't explain why, but it sounds more "open" or more "spacious". This is just a matter of wild speculation, but the best way I can guess at what's going on is that it might sound like there is an EQ boost at some point in the spectrum without having to add one. I have not tried every possible combination, but for an audio clip recorded with CS 5.5 at 192khz and then played back within both AA 3 and CS 5.5, I can detect a difference. And, while I have a decent audio interface, I think that my audio monitors would generally be considered to be insufficient for mastering purposes. Perhaps someone else can weigh in (possibly from Adobe) and tell me that I am imagining things, but Durin has, in an earlier posting, said that CS 5.5 should sound as good or better.
Steve

I I have a late 2005 power PC G5 that I want to bring back to life. I need to replace the original hard drive, a Maxtor 250 GB Sata. Can I replace it with modern drives, SATA 5-6 etc?

I have a late 2005 power PC G5 that I want to bring back to life. I need to replace the original hard drive, a Maxtor 250 GB Sata. Can I replace it with modern drives, SATA 5-6 etc?

I knew I should never get rid of my old G5's. By the way, there is a browser still supported for the PPC, TenFourFox, if you're not using it already. Go to the Floodgap website (they author it) download it for free. The only thing it doesn't support is the Flash plugin, but the browser works great. Other video types are supported. It's based on Firefox, and runs most of the plugins and add-ons. It's very fast, and beats all other browsers on the browser compatibility and speed test. That's now my default on my G5's. Firefox and Safari are no longer supported. As far as the OS, both Tiger and Leopard were solid for me. The reason, as I stated before, was iMovie. The version in Tiger with iLife was far superior to what Apple changed it to. They 'dumbed it down' for the masses. Even the newest iLife 11 on my Mac Pro quad isn't is good, in my opinion. So Leopard should be fine for you. It's a much larger browser in terms of sheer megabytes and disk space, but it's fine. As far as getting an OS disc, I'm seeing Tiger for about $45.00, Leopard for $50 - 60.00 on that famous auction site. As far as RAM, I have 8GB in my G5 2.3, but you should check Activity Monitor when you are running your apps. See how much green slice you have left (unused RAM). You might find you don't need eight. A Mac Pro will grab more free RAM than a PPC machine will. I have a hard time maxing out use of my 8 on the PPC. Not true with the eight on my Mac Pro. The OS doesn't hesitate to grab and use it. You might be OK with 6GB on your PPC. More will not make you faster, as long as you still have free RAM available. As far as backup on your resurrected machine: look for a firewire enabled backup if can. Use CCC (Carbon Copy Cloner) and make a clone backup. Next time your PPC machine wipes out the hard drive, just take your Firewire drive and plug it into another PPC machine, and you can select it as your boot drive. You'll be back and running in five minutes. You can also take the physical drive out of your enclosure, and put it in your tower to replace the failed drive, and you'll be back to where you were in less than ten minutes, OS and all. The PowerMac has an 800 port, so you can do the 800 on the machine to an 800 port on your backup. A firewire 800 to 800 cable is only about $8.00. It runs nice and fast through the 800 port. I like the OWC Mercury Extreme enclosures. They use USB, Firewire 800, and eSATA, so all your options are open.

Have not purchased music for 10 months, in the meantime card has expired, which has £1.74 in credit on it, tried to change card details to current last 4 numbers/expiry date and security code but keeps on rejecting and brings back old card details

Have not purchased music for 10 months, in the meantime card has expired, which has £1.74 in credit on it, tried to change card details to current last 4 numbers/expiry date and security code but keeps on rejecting and brings back old card details

Try here > iTunes Store: My credit card's security code or zip code does not match my bank's records

I had iweb on my last computer - bought a new 2013 macbook pro a few months ago and it's gone. I have a webpage I build on it and now I need to get back in to update it. Help.

i had iweb on my last computer - bought a new 2013 macbook pro a few months ago and it's gone. I have a webpage I build on it and now I need to get back in to update it. Help.

Well of course you won't have iWeb on a new MacBook from this year. iWeb has not shipped on new Macs for a long time now and Apple has not sold iLife through its stores or online for over a year and does not support iWeb any longer.
If you want iWeb now, you will either need to purchase a new copy of iLife or try and find the old install discs from your old Mac and re-install iWeb from that disc. It also depends on what iWeb version you were using too - iWeb 08 or 09? If 08, then this is not compatible with Mavericks which will be running on a new Mac, so you'll need iWeb 09 for this. If you can find your old install discs and they are iWeb 09 then go ahead and use these, but if not, you will have to purchase the iLife 09 or 11 boxed set from Amazon and both of these contain iWeb 09 and you can then install it.
Also, when you set up your new Mac, did you migrate info over? If you had built a website on your old Mac, then you need to data file where all iWeb info is stored and that is called your domain.sites file and you need this file to be transferred if you want your website back again.
Can you get access to thhis file on your old Mac and transfer it? If you can then fine, you can access your website again, but if not, you are out of luck and you'll have to re-build your website from scratch using iWeb.
If you don't have iWeb, then now might be a good time to move forward and look at the many alternatives that are out there such as RapidWeaver, Sandvox, and EverWeb which is billed as an iWeb replacement and is very much like iWeb, but with SEO and the ability to create drop down menus built in (check out http://www.everwebapp.com). Other alternatives also include Flux 4, Freeway Pro and Express and WebAcapella 4.
Have a look and most of these allow you to download free trials so you can try before you buy.

Will they bring back camara roll? This is the ownly thing the IOS8 software needs to sort out

Bring back camara roll!

Hi lindab63,
Welcome to the community!
I'm sorry for the problems you're having with your broadband speed and for the time this is taking to sort out. I can help you from here. To get in touch, click on the "about me" section of my profile where you'll see the link to "contact the mods".
Thanks a million,
Robbie
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

V9 don't work with 1password I need to go back to the last version 8.1

I updated to v 9.0 now my 1password don't link up I need to go back to the last version how do I ???

The latest version of 1password extension for Firefox is compatible with Firefox 9.0. They may have set the max version incorrectlt at 12.0 when the max allowed at moment is 12.0a1 and one needs to reinstall the latest 1password extension.
http://support.agilebits.com/discussions/browser-extensions/1144-firefox-9-extension-not-compatible

I had to reboot my iphone. I now need to download my last backing from the cloud to get back my photos etc. How do I do it? IO have an Iphone 4

I had to reboot my iphone. I now need to download my last back up from the cloud - how do I do this?

All of your apps should be in iTunes on the computer, simply sync them back.
If they are not, go into the purchase history and download them again.

Formula Needed to bring back last Case Comment related to a Case

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for