Freetype2 with GD Library (PHP Developement)

I am wanting to develop with the GD Library for PHP and use Freetype2. Do I need to have Developer Tools installed? Is it necessary to use my Snow Leopard machine, or is Leopard fine? I have both...
The only reason I ask, I seem to get some of the image functions to work, but when I try to access some of the Type Functions I get errors (imagefttext). I am thinking, maybe I got the GD Library installed correctly, but for some reason cannot get the Fonts installed correctly. In one of the links I read, they mention Developer Tools need to be installed for this to work.
This is the link I tried to follow. Second post. Working through Terminal, was getting errors. Not finding directories, and also, GNU does not recogize "make"...
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=381298
Any help would be greatly appreciated!

I'm thinking...
in "init.php" to see if FreeType2 is available.
As a first step to resolve this recompile Your PHP4 setup using the following basic configuration (depending on the local conditions some options/path might have to be changed). The critical options are marked in bold.
./configure --prefix=/usr/share \--datadir=/usr/share/php \--with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs \--libdir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include \--bindir=/usr/bin \--with-config-file-path=/etc \--enable-mbstring --enable-mbregex \--with-mysql \--with-gd \--enable-gd-imgstrttf \--enable-gd-native-ttf \--with-ttf-dir=/usr/lib \--with-freetype-dir=/usr/lib \--with-zlib-dir=/usr/lib \--with-png-dir=/usr/lib \--with-jpeg-dir=/usr/lib \--with-xpm-dir=/usr/X11R6 \--with-tiff-dir=/usr/lib \--enable-memory-limit --enable-safe-mode \--bindir=/usr/bin \--enable-bcmath -enable-calendar \--enable-ctype --with-ftp \--enable-magic-quotes \--enable-inline-optimization \--with-iconv
If there is still no TTF fonts displayed then the enxt step is to upgrade Your TTF libraries to the latest version. The FreeType version 2.1.9 is known to work well.
http://jpgraph.net/doc/faq.php
If you want to use the TrueType font support, you must also install theFreeType 2.x library, including the header files. See the Freetype Home Page, or SourceForge. No, I cannot explain why that site is down on a particular day, and no, I can't send you a copy.
http://www.boutell.com/gd/manual2.0.33.html

Similar Messages

Lightroom 2015 version on creative cloud I am getting a blue screen with x mark when i am switch from library to develop mode

Lightroom 2015 version on creative cloud I am getting a blue screen with x mark when i am switch from library to develop mode

Hi Chandan,
Kindly try the below mentioned link.
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Help | Lightroom GPU FAQ
Please share the results once you have tried the steps.
Thanks,
Atul Saini

After updating to new 2014 updates Lightroom would not go from 'library' to Develop - screen was greyed out with the message saying:- Please renew your membership to reinstate the develop module. My membership is up to date. I then uninstalls Lightroom an

After updating from CC to new 2014 updates Lightroom would not go from 'Library' to 'Develop' - develop screen was greyed out showing the message 'Develop module is disabled. Please renew your membership to reactivate the Develop module.' Since my membership is fully up to date. I then uninstalled Lightroom 5 and then installed it again. Now when I try to open Lightroom 5 its LOGO flashes onto the screen and then 'crashes' in an instant. Please fix.

Hi brooks45,
Please try the steps mentioned in the KB Doc : http://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/unable-launch-lightroom-55.html
Regards,
Rave

Images once exported (RAW) do not show up in catalog or previous imorts not film strips in library nor develop. They are in the files to which they were exported

Not sure how to get this going seems rather redundant.
In the last 4 - 5 days I have imported several hundred RAW files, done some minimal post processing and exported these images to various files (I have verified that the images are in the files to which I exported them). These images to no show up in previous imports nor do they show up in library nor develop film strips. How or can I get them to show up for additional review and possible manipulation. I recently did this same operation with largle JPEG files and all went well.
I did initially have some problems with LR recognizing the RAW files but some how was able to overcome that ( perhaps a card issue they are old card and the JPEGs were on a new card hmmmm!!??)
Any ways I supposed I can reimport them from their current files but that is a redundant pain. Suggestions would be apprediated

One possibility is that you accidentally opened a new/different catalog.
Look at File->Open Recent and open the catalogs shown there and see if your photos appear

Using JavaCompiler together with a Library

Currently I am developing a tool in which Java Source Files are created based on a XSD file with help of a tool named Castor.
After the generation of the files the files need to be compiled in order to be used by the program. This used to be done with a Library named XMLBean, however I do not wish to use this library anymore.
As a alternative I ended up using the Java compiler that comes with the JDK in the tools.jar file. This resulted in a problem, which made me search for a other solution. This way I ended up working with the javax.tools.JavaCompiler. However compilation still failed due to the same problem.
So what is this problem?
Initially I tested my code generation logic and compile logic in a normal application. The Java code got generated fine using castor, the compilation using both methods I described also went fine.
The problem occurs when I attempt to use the same logic in a web application I am developing to run on Tomcat. The Code generation goes fine (since the castor library is included in the project) however the compilation goes wrong and results in the following error:
"package org.exolab.castor.xml does not exist"
In other words, the compiler does not understand one of the imports of the source file (refering to a namespace in Castor, a library that was used to generate the file, and is included in the web project).
Does anyone know why compilation fails in a web application but goes well in a normal application? Does anyone know how this problem can be solved, or does anyone know better component for compilation?
Thanks a lot.
This is the code I currently use for compilation:
public void compileJavaSource(String[] sourceFilePaths)
          System.out.println("Begin Compiling of Source Files");
          JavaCompiler compiler = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler(); // Line 1.
          DiagnosticCollector<JavaFileObject> diagnosticsCollector = new DiagnosticCollector<JavaFileObject>();
          StandardJavaFileManager fileManager = compiler.getStandardFileManager(diagnosticsCollector, null, null); // Line 3.
          Iterable<? extends JavaFileObject> fileObjects = fileManager.getJavaFileObjectsFromStrings(Arrays.asList(sourceFilePaths)); // Line 5
          CompilationTask task = compiler.getTask(null, fileManager, diagnosticsCollector, null, null, fileObjects); // Line 6
          Boolean result = task.call(); // Line 7
          List<Diagnostic<? extends JavaFileObject>> diagnostics = diagnosticsCollector.getDiagnostics();
          for(int i=0; i < diagnostics.size(); i++){
               Diagnostic<? extends JavaFileObject> d = diagnostics.get(i);
               System.out.println(d.getMessage(null));
          if(result == true) {
               System.out.println("Compilation has succeeded");
          else {
               System.out.println("Compilation fails.");
          System.out.println("Done Compiling of Source Files");
     } Initially I used this:
com.sun.tools.javac.Main.compile(sourceFilePaths);

Cross posted. (Sorry about that)
To avoid people spending time looking for an answer, here is the solution I found myself:
First off all, for ANT to work, 2 libraries have to be imported in the web project.
The libraries are: ant.jar and ant-launcher.jar
Next to that, the library's Xerces (xercesImpl.jar) and xml-apis.jar (also included in ANT). There Library's are also needed to get Castor to work.
To compile the code of my generated Java Classes I use the following ANT Build file code:
<project default="build" basedir=".">
     <path id="classpath">
        <fileset dir="WEB-INF/lib" includes="**/*.jar"/>
    </path>
     <target name="build">
        <javac srcdir="src" destdir="WEB-INF/classes" debug="true" includes="**/*.java" classpathref="classpath"/>
     </target>
</project>The file basically reads every .java file from my "src" folder. Which is the folder I choose to put my generated class files, and compiles them to the WEB-INF/classes folder. This is the folder were Tomcat stores all its classes.
What went wrong with the compilation I attempted in the opening post, is that javac could not find the Castor Library, even after I added it in my classpath environment variable. Fortunately, with ANT I can define a classpath for the application, which is the WEB-INF/lib folder. This is the folder where Tomcat stores its Library's. Hence, javac can find the Castor Library from then on.
Finally I call the ant task using the following Java Code:
public void compileJavaSource(String buildFilePath)
          System.out.println("Start Compilation");
          File buildFile = new File(buildFilePath);
          Project p = new Project();
          p.setUserProperty("ant.file", buildFilePath);
          p.init();
          ProjectHelper helper = ProjectHelper.getProjectHelper();
          p.addReference("ant.projectHelper", helper);
          helper.parse(p, buildFile);
          p.executeTarget(p.getDefaultTarget());
          System.out.println("Compilation Finished");
     }This took care of the problem pretty nicely.

Library and Develop Module Photos Appear Different

I am using Lightroom 4.4 Dell Ultrasharp monitor is calibrated. I own and have been referring to Scott Kelby's Lightroom4 book for digital photographers. I recently took some photos of my daughters prom. She had on a beautiful reddish orange dress. I notice that the dress appears very red in the develop module, however, appears a bit more orange in the library module. The change is very noticeable between the modules. The dress also appears similar to the library module view (a bit more orange) when viewed on the web via Flickr utilizing Chrome, Firefox, or IPad. It also appears the same when exported to a JPEG file.
I have done some experimenting and have determined that this color change effect appears to be very noticeable utilizing the Adobe Standard Camera Calibration Profile. It does not happen (at least to a noticeable extent) with the others such as Camera Standard where the dress appears a bit more orange in both the library and develop module. I do, however, like the appearance of the Adobe Standard profile better and this happens to be the default profile as well.
I have also noticed that the dress looks more orange when Soft Proofing is enabled. The change happens immediately when the check box is enabled. Checking the box makes the photo appear similar to the Library module view. Enabling Soft Proofing does make noticeable that there is Destination Gamut Warning which mainly involves the dress which is the point of interest, however, there is no warning with the Monitor Gamut Warning. I am intending to place the photos on the web at this time via Flickr. I will be printing several later so will be worrying about the printer gamut at that time. But for now, I would like to get the photos on the web looking as intended.
Having the photos look so different in the Library and Develop Modules is very frustrating. I am hoping that there is a simple setting or fix for this problem that I am experiencing. Your assistance will be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
-Mark

Hi Victoria. Thanks for your reply. Re the saturation of the yellows, an example of a photo which shows the behaviour is that of a sunflower shot in direct sunlight. So a typical bright yellow. The raw files are from a D7000, so I have several "camera" profiles to choose from in LR4, in addition to the default Adobe Standard. None of the camera profiles show a difference between Library & Develop. Also, the Adobe Standard profile only shows the described behaviour when yellows are present. I can find plenty of examples where the photos are identical between the two modules when there are no yellows in the shot. I doubt this is a monitor profiling problem, given that it affects just the Adobe Standard profile, however I will try re-profiling. My U2412M display is not wide gamut. I posted here because the issue I am seeing sounds very similar to the original poster's. We're both using Dell Ultrasharp displays, although that could be a coincidence. I'll see if I can get some screen grabs from my Mac and upload here later today. I'm on my Windows 7 laptop at the moment.
R
Update:
I have a pair of screen grab JPEGs from the Mac which I'm happy to share, however the upload here in the forum is limited in size. Any suggestions how I can best share the full size JPEGs?
Re-profiling hasn't changed anything. I'm pretty sure my profile is good. Ambient natural lighting, monitor warmed up, etc. Native white point used as always. The difference between profiled and unprofiled is very subtle. The U2412M appears to be pretty accurate at factory settings.
If I turn soft proofing on in Develop I see the less saturated image which matches Library. Turning it off again and the differences return.
LR4 on my Windows 7 laptop doesn't have the same problem. The screen on that is calibrated with the same Spyder3, however the laptop's screen is of a mediocre quality compared to the U2412M.
Found another thread where the poster is having the same problems with yellows, this time in LR5.
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1265004

Color shift between Library and Develop module

Hi,
I recently noticed a color shift between in the image when going from the library to the develop module. Yes, I know this is mentioned in the FAQ, but I did not find the solutions given there to be satisfactory.
Let me explain what happens: I have taken Photos with my Canon EOS 300D, in Jpeg mode with Color Space in the Camera set to AdobeRGB. The photos I am talking about were taken with Tungsten light with auto white balance and have a distinct orange color cast. I use Windows XP and view my Photos on a LCD Display calibrated with the Pantone Huey system. The Lightroom Library Module and Photoshop CS2 both display the original image almost identically (there are no changes applied inside Lightroom or Photoshop, I view the original image in both applications). Photoshop is set to use the Adobe RGB Color space as its working Color space, Softproofing is switched off. However, when I switch to the Develop Module, the colors (especially the orange hues) shift very noticably toward pink. I can only assume that the Colorspace conversion or maybe some implicit soft proof used differs between the modules. So, to restate the problem: If I switch back and forth between Library and Develop, without changing anything and in 1:1 view to avoid errors introduced by different zooming methods, the colors shift quite drastically back and forth.
I have to say that this is really quite annoying. The whole point for me to use the develop module is to use it to make adjustments to the colors, and for this to work properly I have to see the same colors in both modules and in Photoshop. There is no point in correcting a pink color cast away in Develop that is not even there in either the library module or Photoshop (and that would then have a stronger orange tint because I tried to counter the pink tint in develop).
So this leads me to the final question: Is it possible to tell Develop to use the exact same color settings as the Library Module? Or is there another way to compensate for the color shift?
I hope I was clear in what happens and what I tried to do. If it helps I can gladly provide a sample photograph that clearly illustrates the point.
Thank you in advance for your help,
Daniel

Thanks for your comments, Don and Fred. I hope that this issue will be worked on soon.
Fred, I have set the Preview Quality to High, but it doesn't seem to make any differences concerning the color shift. I have investigated this matter further by now and made the following observations:
*The color shift is a lot less noticable on my laptop (the laptop screen is also color profiled). On my laptop the change is more of a subtle shift in contrast than in color. This might be caused by the smaller color gammut of my laptop display though.
*I have uploaded a testimage so that others can check if this shift occurs at their workstations too - after all, it might be a misconfiguration of my color management software, though I doubt that (because Adobe already states that library and develop render different previews). I would be interested if the color shift I describe is noticable at other workstations too. The link to the testimage: http://www.danyx.com/colorshift.jpg (permission to use the image to test the color reproduction is of course granted hereby).
Thanks for your help, I hope Adobe will listen soon,
Daniel

Problems with recordset in PHP/MySQL setting

We use Dreamweaver CS5 for creating dynamic pages (PHP pages with MySQL database). We test the site locally on a Windows 7 operating system with EasyPHP as WAMP server.
We often have a problem in managing the record set.
The following problem occurs quite often:
We take a PHP page. We create a recordset. We use a dynamic table or a repeated region to show the results of the recordset. So far so good.
Then we want to change something to the recordset for example the filter. When editing the recordset, the advanced mode is shown, it is impossible to swith to the simple mode.
By deleting the recordset the problem is not solved. By deleting and afterwards rebuilding the recordset, syntax errors occur. It seems that the php code for building the recordset didn't dissapear.
The only solutions till now seems to completely restart with a new PHP page.
Anyone has a solution for this or anyone did experience the same problem ?
Thank you very much in advance.
Ilse

You cannot switch to Simple mode in the Recordset dialog box if you have made any changes to the SQL in Advanced mode.
Opening the Recordset dialog box to edit the settings does occasionally result in the code being inserted again instead of being changed. This appears to be an intermittent bug, which I have experienced myself, and know that others have complained about it, too. As far as I know, there is no solution other than to watch carefully the code that Dreamweaver generates.
If you don't understand the code, you would be well advised to learn what it means and does. Relying on Dreamweaver to do everything for you severely limits what you can do with PHP/MySQL. Adobe regards the server behaviors as quick prototyping tools, rather than for developing production websites.

Do we need a Library and Develop Module?

Do we really need a Library and Develop module? There's lots of dissatisfaction with Lightroom speed and one of the problem areas is when switching from Library, when in standard preview or 1:1, to Develop and the 'loading' message appears or as on my mac the dreaded spinning beach ball goes crazy. Even with all the previews created it's still slow.
So, if we have a standard preview or 1:1 loaded why can't we automatically be ready to apply any adjustments and save an extra step to another module? The quick develop in the library seems unnecessary and I've never used it. That leaves the metadata and keywording panels requiring a new location, but again these are not something I need to refer to on a regular basis.
Anyone else any similar thoughts?

> ...but I'm pretty darn sure there won't be any back-stepping to REMOVE or substantially alter LR's basic premise...pretty sure Develop will always be about dealing with a single image adjustment (and applying that adjustment to other images if you wish).
And I'm okay with this premise, but it needs additional functionality, such as the ability to apply relative adjustments. It already has this via the keyboard shortcuts while hovering. It just needs a UI adjustment (I once did a mockup of this, and I think it works) and the ability for autosync to recognize them as relative adjustments to the other images.
It also needs additional views. Grid, survey and compare would be nice, but you're only adjusting a single image's RAW data rendering at a time - the others are shown as previews and adjustments to them are rendered that way (like Library does).
The issue is, many people like me end up switching modules far too often. I generally go back and forth between Library and Develop hundreds of times per day. That's way too many times to be suffering the module-switching penalty. I'd prefer to select the images I'm working on in Library, and never see that module again until I'm done working on them. For now, grid and survey are too often needed, and so are relative adjustments.
Develop already has most of the needed functionality. Relative adjustments are already available to one image, a grid is available but only at 1 row (film strip supplied by Library) and a quick-render (the image in the upper left) is available as well. This just needs to be expanded and adjusted so that going back and forth to Library isn't as necessary as it is now. Ideally, you'd import in Library, to your metadata stuff there or in other related modules, choose the image group you want to work on using filters/folders/collections/find, then go to Develop and work on them until you are done.

Lr3 upload in library or develop

Uploading pictures in library or develop with the trial Lr3 is very slow. I work with a Mac OS X, 4 GB memory....
Trash is empty, available memory 2,54 BG, 1,45 in use.
I had the same problem with my Lr version Lr 2.6, it became suddenly slow from one day into another??
What can/must I do???
Tina Piano

Maybe it'the old bug that gets out of metadata entry at some point and further keystrokes act as shortcuts. "D" gets you to develop, "R" to crop etc.
Do you have xmp auto-write? Having it on increases the chance of such behaviour.

Lightroom 6 difference in color in Library vs Develop module

Hello,
i have recently installed LR6 and converted existing LR5 catalog. I have an issue that in Library module, all pictures looks yellow (like wrong color balance) and in Develop module they look correct. When i export a picture into JPG file it also looks correct. But the color difference between Library and Develop modules is huge with Library shifted into yellow tones.
Does anybody know what to do?
Best regards,
Pavel

Hello,
i have recently installed LR6 and converted existing LR5 catalog. I have an issue that in Library module, all pictures looks yellow (like wrong color balance) and in Develop module they look correct. When i export a picture into JPG file it also looks correct. But the color difference between Library and Develop modules is huge with Library shifted into yellow tones.
Does anybody know what to do?
Best regards,
Pavel

LR 5 slow in Library and Development module

Hi,
Used LR 5's trial version for a month and then bought full version last week. Withing 2-3 days of useage, started experiencing time lag to import, view, edit and export images. Even a simple exposure correction takes couple of seconds lag !!
Any solution to this issue?

Thanks for that Bob,
the really confusing thing is that the magnification appear to be identical between the library and development module while the development module is still softer....
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:01:33 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: sharpness between library and development module
    Re: sharpness between library and development module
    created by bob frost in Photoshop Lightroom - View the full discussion
The general rule is that sharpening will only appear correctly at 1:1 in Lightroom, or at 100% in Photoshop. Any other magnifications are just a simulation of what the pixels would look like if you could see them all, i.e. not accurate. Bob Frost
     Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4988844#4988844
     Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4988844#4988844
     To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4988844#4988844. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
     Start a new discussion in Photoshop Lightroom by email or at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Best Practical JSP Book for PHP developer

Hi Friends,
I am new to JSP and want learn basics of JSP so that I can do simple web page works.
I am a PHP developer with one and half years of experience.
Can anybody tell me what is the best JSP book for beginners or any web link with lots of simple jsp example?
--Sujoy

Before you learn JSP, you need to learn Java. I heard 'Head First in Java' is a good book. Install Eclipse IDE (its free) and work through some of the book's examples in it (as you read the book from cover to cover). Then Install Tomcat (its free) and the tomcat plugin for Eclipse (its free). Then read a book on JSP (cover to cover). I like the book 'JSP in action'. It covers both JSP and servlets. Then, create a hello world JSP in Eclipse, then a hello world servlet in Eclipse.

Regarding PHP Development to Related area in SAP

Hi All,
I am presently working in PHP Development technologies & Web services.
Now i want learn some related area in SAP which relates to PHP Development.
Can anybody sujjest any technology in SAP which will be suitable for me to get started and will have good future!
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi,
maybe start with <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/e9/bb153aab4a0c0ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm">BSP (Business Server Pages)</a>, go through the <a href="https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BSP">Wiki</a>. This should give you enough information for a start. Once you got a grip on BSP, try to expand your knowledge to MVC development, which is the foundation for Web Dynpro ABAP, the future standard UI technology.
Good luck with your SAP start!
Max

White Balance: Library versus Develop modules

I don't understand why the WB controls in the Library versus Develop modules differ as to choices. Sometimes I work with JPEGs rather than RAW and then in Libray I can chooose shade etc, but not in the Develop module.
Is there a theoretical reason for this or a design hiccup?

There probably shouldn't be specific choices in QD for JPEGs either. This is because JPEGs don't have an absolute WB reference like RAWs do. If you shoot in daylight and select daylight WB, you'll get an entirely different WB than if you shoot in tungsten and select daylight WB.
In other words, LR has no way to know the starting point on a JPEG since it isn't encoded in the file.

Freetype2 with GD Library (PHP Developement)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for