From date(ETTIFN-AB) greater than To date(ETTIFN-BIS) in table ETTIFN

Hi,
In my client system I have observed that in table ETTIFN(Installation Facts (Normal) for a specific operand the "From date" field contains date which is greater than the date contained in the "To date" field.
eg: from date = 20/7/2008
To date = 4/4/2008
This is observed in multiple records of the same operand.
Can any one throw some light on this issue.
1) How this could have happened, and using what transaction.
2) what will be the effect of such entry on rate category and billing.
3) how this can be changed.
any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
thanks
ajay

In my experience, this a sort of a bug that happens in several time sliced tables.
However, the programs only seem to take the BIS date into account, so this inconsistency doesn't create any problems.
If I'm not mistaken, there are some notes on this error, but I'm not sure if it'll fix the problem for every table.
When in doubt, create a customer message to SAP explaining in which cases the error is generated and ask for a correction.

Similar Messages

PO Doc Date is not Greater than MIGO Date.

Dear All,
I ahve Done PO with doc date 02.02.2009 & i create MIGO as 25.01.2009 System is accepting this document.
so i want restriction of this procedure.
PO date is not greater than MIGO date.
Thanks
Shital

hi
for ur problem just set message no ME039 as error message
go to SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Environment Data>Define Attributes of System Messages
here make message ME -039 as error
regards
KI

How To View An Item When Publish Date Is Set Greater Than Current Date

Using Oracle Portal Version: 10.1.2.0.2 (Build: 139).
The customer(content manager) uploads a document into the portal on 28-JUL-2006 07:08 AM.
The publish date is change to 1-AUG-2006 00:01 AM.
There is a portal user group needing to review the document prior to the publish date.
I created an oracle procedure to display the links to the unpublished items.
Unfortunately the links generate an item can not be found error.
When the publish date is met the links function properly.
How can provide a method to allow this user group to view the unpublished document without granting them the manage content privilege on the page?
Thanks

For anyone else struggling with this... In my case this was not working due to a bug in XI R2, XI 3.0, and XI 3.1. QueryService modifyDataProvider (tracking ADAPT01113234) has been fixed with XI Release 2 FixPack 4.5 and I've tested that it did work for me. No such fix is available for XI 3.0 or XI 3.1 as of this post but I was told that it would get a fix in the next SP (fingers crossed)

Datetime in log is greater than current date, how to adjust them

our env is jes8.1 and solaris 8, and the datetime of log in jes is 8 hours greater than current date in solaris, I want to know how to adjust datetime of log to current date?

Type
#date
at the prompt and check whether the log file date/time and the system date/time are the same. I guess the log file uses the system date/time. if tats the case then change the system date/time

Doc Date is Greater than Posting Date in Migo

Hi ,
Document Date shouldn't be greater than Posting date in MIGO .How can I restrict it ??
Biswajit

Hi
We can restrict through Define Attributes of system messages
Settings for SYSTEM MESSAGES - Doc Date is Greater than Posting Date in Migo in that in that Message Type we can make the Warning Message to Error Message
regards,
senthil.

Need to create a workflow after Date Modified is greater than 7 days

I'm using SharePoint Deisnger 2010 and attempting to create a workflow to generate an email after the Date Modified is greater than 7 days. Checking to see if there is a way to create this workflow without creating a "calculated" field with a date.
Have:
If Current Item:Modified is greater than Today
But would like to have 7 days not today or a set date.
What's the best way to do this?

Hello,
In addition to Bistech, here is link to set date in WF context variable.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17082455/sharepoint-designer-2010-set-variable-today-x-days
Hemendra:Yesterday is just a memory,Tomorrow we may never see
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help

PR Date Should be less than PO date

Hi
I have done the change in message type to control PO date at the time of creation, now PO can be created only in current date but if at a later stage somebody has been created one more PR and change the PO and add one more line item from this PR then PR date is greater than PO date.
So this is objectionable and I want to control this i.e. PR date should be less than PO date.
Please guide how can i achieve this?
Regards
Ajay Goel

Hello,
Ajay if u you want to restrict the PO can be created only in current date then u can take help of your ABAPER because its possible through BADI.
If you want to add the other line item in PO Or Use Tcode Me22n you can not change the document date that time bcoz its disable check it.

End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it

Hello
I put CONTRACT START DATE and CONTRACT END DATE fields on the form. These 2 objects (Date/Time objjects) i pulled them from Satndard tab of pallette and dropped on my layout page design, fine.
Now, am trying to put a validation that the end dat eshould not lower than start date, so, i got a thread as below from Niall,
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1909551
and i did my FormCalc coding under EXIT event of END DATE field as below,
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_START_DATE") .rawValue
endDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue
if (stDate > endDate) then
    xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
    xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue = null
endif
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End
I tried in VALIDATE, CALCULATE, CHANGE events of END DATE, but nothing working!!
PLs. let me kow how can i achieve my requirement? I am anewbie,
Thank you

If you use the exit event, you will probably have to have the same code on both the start and end date fields since they have a dependancy on each other. Maybe better to try the validate event of the end date so that if either field is changed the event gets fired. You can try the following for validate event
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = CON_START_DATE.rawValue
endDate = $.rawValue
if ( HasValue(endDate) ) then
    if (stDate > endDate) then
        xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
        $.rawValue = null
    endif
endif
1
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End

Contract End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it

Hello
I put CONTRACT START DATE and CONTRACT END DATE fields on the form. These 2 objects (Date/Time objjects) i pulled them from Satndard tab of pallette and dropped on my layout page design, fine.
Now, am trying to put a validation that the end dat eshould not lower than start date, so, i got a thread as below from Niall,
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1909551
and i did my FormCalc coding under EXIT event of END DATE field as below,
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_START_DATE") .rawValue
endDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue
if (stDate > endDate) then
xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue = null
endif
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End
I tried in VALIDATE, CALCULATE, CHANGE events of END DATE, but nothing working!!
PLs. let me kow how can i achieve my requirement? I am anewbie,
Thank you

http://forums.adobe.com/message/4264933#4264933

SAP Table index size is greater than the size of the actual table

Hello Experts,
We are resolving an issue related to database performance. The present database size is 9 Terabytes. The analysis of response times through ST03N shows that the db time is 50% of the total response time. We are planning to reorganize the most updated tables (found from DB02old tx).
Here we see that the size of the index for a table is greater than the actual size of the table. Is this possible, if yes then how can we reorganize the index as it does not allow us to reorganize the index using brspace command.
Hope to hear from you soon, and if any additional activities you can suggest to improve the performance of the database will be appreciated.
Thank you

Hi Zaheer,
online redef may help you (for a little while) , but also check WHY the index became fragmented.
Improper settings can bring the index fragmented again and you have reoccuring reorg needs.
i.e.
check if PCT_INCREASE >0 if you are using Dictionary Managed Tablespaces or locally managed tablespaces that uses a "User" allocation policy. Set it to 0 to generate uniform next extents in the online reorg.
select
            SEGMENT_NAME,
            SEGMENT_TYPE,
            round((NEXT_EXTENT*BLOCKS)/(EXTENTS*BYTES))*(BYTES/BLOCKS),
            PCT_INCREASE
        from
            DBA_SEGMENTS
        where
            OWNER='SAPR3'
        and
            SEGMENT_TYPE in ('INDEX',
                            'TABLE')
        and
            PCT_INCREASE > 0
        and segment_name in ('Yourtable','Yourindex')
In the following cases, it may be worthwhile to rebuild the index:
     --> the percentage of the space used is bad - lower than 66%: PCT_USED
     --> deleted leaf blocks represent more than 20% of total leaf blocks: DEL_LF_ROWS
     --> the height of the tree is bigger than 3: HEIGHT or BLEVEL
select
name,
'----------------------------------------------------------'    headsep,
'height               '||to_char(height,     '999,999,990')     height,
'blocks               '||to_char(blocks,     '999,999,990')     blocks,
'del_lf_rows          '||to_char(del_lf_rows,'999,999,990')     del_lf_rows,
'del_lf_rows_len      '||to_char(del_lf_rows_len,'999,999,990') del_lf_rows_len,
'distinct_keys        '||to_char(distinct_keys,'999,999,990')   distinct_keys,
'most_repeated_key    '||to_char(most_repeated_key,'999,999,990') most_repeated_key,
'btree_space          '||to_char(btree_space,'999,999,990')       btree_space,
'used_space           '||to_char(used_space,'999,999,990')        used_space,
'pct_used                     '||to_char(pct_used,'990')          pct_used,
'rows_per_key         '||to_char(rows_per_key,'999,999,990')      rows_per_key,
'blks_gets_per_access '||to_char(blks_gets_per_access,'999,999,990') blks_gets_per_access,
'lf_rows      '||to_char(lf_rows,    '999,999,990')||'        '||+
'br_rows      '||to_char(br_rows,    '999,999,990')                  br_rows,
'lf_blks      '||to_char(lf_blks,    '999,999,990')||'        '||+
'br_blks      '||to_char(br_blks,    '999,999,990')                  br_blks,
'lf_rows_len '||to_char(lf_rows_len,'999,999,990')||'        '||+
'br_rows_len '||to_char(br_rows_len,'999,999,990')                  br_rows_len,
'lf_blk_len   '||to_char(lf_blk_len, '999,999,990')||'        '||+
'br_blk_len   '||to_char(br_blk_len, '999,999,990')                br_blk_len
from
index_stats where index_name = 'yourindex'
bye
yk

From Date is greater than End Date of a BBP document.

Hi,
There is a BBP document created in the system which has From Date (BBP Start Date) greater than End BBP Date.
Have any one come across this type of issue.
Can any one tell what can be the reasons for this to happen?
Also in this case there are no entries for the items in this BBP document in database table DFKKMOP.
Thanks in advance,
Hrushikesh

Hi Hrushikesh,
Could you please check the details at billing document level if any of them is having the bad data.
Also, please check the data passed and the importing data for the below FM's in debug mode.
1. START_TIME_DETERMINE
2. END_TIME_DETERMINE
I am not sure, but have heard about the similar issue in one of the project, but it was related with invoicing not specific to BBP.
Let me know the data received for the above FM's, also, will check if I can get any specific details for the same.
Regards,
Rajesh Popat

Numbers function IF greater than using date & time

I am trying to produce a number sheet that will allow me calculate a working rota for staff.
The problem i am having is when i try and use a IF function to remove 1hr (for lunch) if the person works 8 hours or more.
If that person works between 6 and 8 they require a 30 mins lunch.
I have already setup the sheet to calculate the total shift time by subtracting the starting time from the finishing time. i.e. 18:00 - 08:00 = 10hrs
Now i need it to subtract 1hr for lunch.
It should read something like IF 10 >8 then -1 from 10.
I just don't know how to not cause an error.
ideally i would like it to be able to handle 2 IF's in the one cell. if its 6-8hrs - 30mins or if its greater than 7 -1 hr.
I currently have all the cells set at time and date.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Richard

this works a little but it seems to subtract 0.5 and then 1 removing to much time.
I have attached a link which i hope will explain this better.
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=82B56CEF9A61CDE9!8770&authkey=!ALJn-lja2b2 q1iw&ithint=file%2cnumbers
Thank you for your help

Problem with Filtering Data by Using "Greater Than" in APD

Dear Experts,
First of all, I am a novice of SAP Data Mining. I try to filter data in APD by using the 'Restrict Amont of Data (the Filter Icon).' My problem is really simple. I don't know how to filter data which have value greater than a constant.
For example, I try to keep only records which have a quantity greater than 1000.
At the selection option in the single value tab, I found only the '=' option. The options like '>', '<', '>=', etc are not found. Could anyone suggest me please?

I do appreciate your prompt response.
Seemingly, using the interval is our best solution, though it is not best for our customers.
Having already gone through the note you gave me, in fact, it is really pertinent. Unfortunately, our support package is now 13, and it is extremely difficult to retest our system if we decide to apply the support package 16.
Are there any other solution?
By the way, you deserve my point.

Report data showing a date 1 day greater than selection formula end date

Hi All,
   I have a report that contains the following selection:
date(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) >= date(minimum({?Date})) and date(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) <= date(maximum({?Date})) and dayofweek(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) in {?DayOfWeek} and
    time(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) >= time({?Start Time}) and
    time(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) < time({?End Time})
When I view the report, if my date(maximum({?Date})) is 5/1/2011, the report shows data for 5/2/2011. I can't seem to figure out why my report is generating data for a date that is 1 day greater than my end date.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you in advance,

No need to send SQL as dates are not in WHERE clause.
It someting to do with the way crystal handles datetimes
If you want to see dates up to an including 6/2/2011 if its a date time crystal will create a where caluse
Datetimefield <= 6/3/2011 00:00:00
Looks like when this is converted to date its stayin as 6/3/2011
Sorry can't think of any solutions, also I live in UK so just about to leave, hopefully some one else may be able to offer a solution.
Ian

Goods receipt date should be greater than the P.O. date

Hi
Is there any option to control the Goods receipt date should not be lesser than the P.O.Date??
Eg: P.O. is raised in 10.1.9, User should not do the GRN before 10.1.9. In which way we can control this???
Regards
Ravi

Dear,
You have to include User exit in MIGOwhich will trhrow an error at the time when Goods receipt date is greater than the P.O. date.
Regards
Utsav

From date(ETTIFN-AB) greater than To date(ETTIFN-BIS) in table ETTIFN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for