General ledger accouont-issue

Experts:-
    I have one of issue, i.e we are received, material from cost cneter, to cost center, now recived material excess so that  we return to the General stroes, at that thru MB1A, we can do return stroes, systme gives the issue:- G/L xxxxxxxxxx does not exit in COA for xxx
so plz help for this one

I have one of issue, i.e we are received, material from cost cneter, to cost center, now recived material excess so that we return to the General stroes, at that thru MB1A, we can do return stroes, systme gives the issue:- G/L xxxxxxxxxx does not exit in COA for xxx
I created account no as ur advice but the same problem is existing, where we can cehck
but still the same problme exiting
Edited by: ameer rai on May 31, 2008 4:23 PM

Similar Messages

  • General ledger plan issue

    Dear Sapguys,
    we have one g/l account code is 400302 name is printing & stationery these g/l account is using for all cost center, we have defined 10cost center, for indivudial cost center budget is 1000 rs total cost centers budget 10000,i know how to create based on cost center wise budget, same way all cost center of cost to g/l i want to maintain 400302 cost is 10,000rs that means plan value 10000 where i have to mentioned.
    Regards
    Veeru

    Hi,
    If you do your planning in CO (on cost element) you always make it on combination with cost object. You cannot make planning for cost element (G/L) alone.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items 0FIGL_O14  Performace issue

    Dear Forum,
    We are facing a performance issue while loading the data to 0FIGL_O14 General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items from  CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
    Please see my requirement below for updating the data to 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
    This report is generated to display Dry Dock and Running Repair expenses for the particular Purchase orders with respective G/L's.
    1) The G/L DSO will provide us the 0DEBIT_LC and    0DEB_CRE_DC Foreign currency amount with signs (+/-) amounts and.
    2) ZMMPRC01 Cube   will provide us the 0ORDER_VALUE  (Purchse order value)and    0INVCD_AMNT Invoice  amount.
    While we are loading the data from  CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO ,we have created nearly 19 InfoObject  level routine to derive the below mentioned fields data for MM Purchase Order related records.
    0CHRT_ACCTS    Chart of accounts
    0ITEM_NUM      Number of line item within accounting documen
    0AC_DOC_NO     Accounting document number
    0GL_ACCOUNT    G/L Account
    0COMP_CODE     Company code
    0COSTCENTER    Cost Center
    0CO_AREA       Controlling area
    0COSTELMNT     Cost Element
    0SEGMENT       Segment for Segmental Reporting
    0BUS_AREA      Business area
    0FUNC_AREA     Functional area
    0AC_DOC_NR     Document Number (General Ledger View)
    0AC_DOC_TYP    Document type
    0POST_KEY      Posting key
    0PSTNG_DATE    Posting date in the document
    0DOC_CURRCY    Document currency
    0LOC_CURTP2    Currency Type of Second Local Currency
    0CALQUART1     Quarter
    0CALYEAR       Calendar year
    For reference Please see the below logic to derive the data for PO related record.
    DATA:
          MONITOR_REC    TYPE rsmonitor.
    $$ begin of routine - insert your code only below this line        -
        ... "insert your code here
        types : begin of ty_FIGL,
                    CHRT_ACCTS type /BI0/OICHRT_ACCTS,
                    ITEM_NUM type /BI0/OIITEM_NUM,
                    AC_DOC_NO type /BI0/OIAC_DOC_NO,
                    GL_ACCOUNT type /BI0/OIGL_ACCOUNT,
                end of ty_FIGL.
        data :it_figl type STANDARD TABLE OF ty_figl,
              wa_figl type ty_figl.
        SELECT single CHRT_ACCTS
                        ITEM_NUM
                        AC_DOC_NO
                        GL_ACCOUNT from /BI0/AFIGL_O1400
                          into wa_figl
                          where DOC_NUM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_NUM and
                                DOC_ITEM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_ITEM and
                                /BIC/Z_PCODE = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_PCODE
                                and
                                /BIC/Z_VOY_NO = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_VOY_NO
                                and
                                FISCYEAR = SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCYEAR.
        if sy-subrc = 0.
          RESULT = wa_figl-AC_DOC_NO.
        ENDIF.
        clear wa_figl.
    Please note the same kind of logic is applied for all the above mentioned fields.
    Here is my concerns and issue.
    For the all above all routines i am referring BI0/AFIGL_O1400
    DSO and finally loading to the Same DSO(BI0/AFIGL_O1400
    The worried part is my DSO  0FIGL_O1400 is currecnly having nearly 60 Lacks records and MM cube is having nearly 55 requests which are required to update to the Above DSO for PO related PO value and Invoice amount.
    The big issue here is while uploading data from MM cube to DSO say for example if the request is having  25,000 records from this  nearly 500-600 records will be updated to DSO.
    But here it is taking huge time ( nearly 3 days for request ) for updating  these records , like this i have to pull 50 more requests from Cube to DSO as per the requirement.
    Please note as of now i haven't created any indexes on DSO to improve this loads.
    Please note am facing this issue in Production environment and need your help ASAP.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Srinivas Padugula

    Hi,
    If selecting data from 0FIGL_O14 is taking long time then you can create secondary indexes on DSO.
    0FIGL_O14 would be huge as data volume directly corresponds to data volume in BSEG.
    But for you requirement, I think what you can do is,
    1. create multiprovider on top of DSO and Cube and create Bex report to give you the fields requried from both the infoproviders, you can then use open hub or APD approach to keep the data in the staging table or direct update DSO and then load the data to the DSO
    2. Create secondary indexes on DSO so that fetching would be faster.
    3. Do the enhancment at R/3 level to fetch fields from MM during load of G/L
    Regards,
    Pravin Karkhanis.

  • Workflow issue with interco transactions & general ledger entries in F-02

    Hello Experts,
    We are encountering a workflow issue when we are entering intercompany transactions with general ledger entries in F-02. Our workflow is set up with two release levels and the details are as follows:
    Amount below $2500 - single release level
    Amount above $2500 - two release levels
    The document type that we are using is SU and it is configured with intercompany postings and trading partner enabled in the control data.
    After parking a GL document that has interco amount entries below $2500 and general ledger amount entries above $2500 in F-02, the document is supposed to go to the two release levels in the workflow because the total amount is above $2500 (interco amount + general ledger amount > $2500). However, in the workflow, the document went to the single release level instead of the two release levels.
    Any idea why the subledger amount takes precedent over the general ledger amounts in determining the workflow release level?
    We would appreciate your help in solving this issue.

    You cannot change the design of the system.
    SAP may consider the change of design if all the users across the industries are reported. If a single user has a special requirement, it cannot be changed.
    You need to ask, whether this is a critical requirement for your business. Otherwise, please follow the standard way.

  • Payment accounted in AP but not posted in General Ledger

    Helloo everyone,
    I have an issue.
    Some Payments have been accounted in AP. However when querying the account in General ledger nothing is found.
    As you can see from the above Accounting has been processed and GL date is 26 Feb 2015, However same information cannot be found in GL.
    Grateful if anyone can pinpoint me to scripts or oracle docs to resolve this issue as it is impacting on the reconciliation process.

    Hello,
    Normal: the transfer to GL request was run on 05 Mar 15
    Now, let us look for the corresponding Batch Name and Journal Entry Name in GL
    Please, in the lines shown in print screen you posted, click the + (show) icon for cash accounting class:
    Under General ledger header you should see Batch and Journal Entry Names:
    If these values are populated in SLA, then search them directly in Enter Journals from (General Ledger Responsibility) and update this discussion
    Thank you

  • Variance between Material Ledger and General Ledger of

    There is again a variance between Material Ledger and General Ledger of
    7.026,64 (Tcode MB5L) as it was already in $$100036500(G/L).
    The strange thing is, that there is only a difference in the GL Account
    Balance report (FS10N) for S240077000(G/L ). In the Line Item report (FBL3N)
    all documents are available. This issue impacts at least the Balance
    carry forward negativ at the year end, because the system will forward
    the the amount of the balance for S240077000, which is now 7.026,64 to
    less.
    Ther first investigations results:
    - all Material- and FI documents are available.
    - the variances in June refer to FI-documnets 4900015286 and 4900015293.
    - the documents, e.g. 4900015292 and 4900015287, are correct and was
    posted at the same day by the same user and with the same transaction
    MI07.
    - there are no differences for the posted materials identificable from
    the other materials

    Material Ledger/Actual costing  MLAC
    MLAC is used where the FG cost varies every month due to external procurement variation.
    Ex: Jan 2011
    FG cost of manufcature internally = 100
    FG cost of procurement externally = 120 ( Company procures due to capacity constraint)
    FG Standard price at the end of month = 110...This is standard price of FG
    Due to heavy fluctuations in the month of February 2011 in procurement...
    Ex: Feb 2011
    FG cost of manufcature internally = 140
    FG cost of procurement externally = 460 ( Company procures due to capacity constraint)
    FG Standard price at the end of month = 300...This is standard price of FG.
    The variance is very high in Feb 2011 and company want to absorb this variance in Feb 2011 iteslef hence they will use MLAC.
    So if the variance is within reasonable limits company usually do not follow MLAC.
    Where as if the variance is very high company usually follow MLAC.
    In Pharma Industry usually the variance is very high on month to month basis hence they follow MLAC.
    Where as in Industrial Mahcineery Manufacturing Company the variance is with in reasonable limits hence they do not follow MLAC. Ofcourse they can use MLAC as well.
    Srinivas

  • The Customer/Vendor Name in the General ledger Report Form.

    I have Questions about General Ledger Report in SAP Business One. Display the Customer/Vendor Name in the General Ledger Report.
    Just would like to ask if its possible to display the Customer/Vendor Name in the General Ledger Report? The format simply have the Customer/Vendor Code on the said report. Is there a work around on this?
    Please help me.

    Hi,
    In the Standard Reports, you cannot add a new column.
    As mentioned by me earlier, please check 'Offset Account Name' column in the Form Settings if the same is of help in your case.
    You can check Note No. [1045356|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1odSZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1045356] regarding the issue. The same has been fixed in 2005 A PL23.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Summarization in General Ledger view

    Hi Gurus,
    Facing a typical issue....
    Working on ECC 6.0.
    Document splitting across profit centers is enabled in our system.
    I am using the below data.
            Customer account    G/L account      Profit center     Amount
              123                                 3350
                                XYZ           5678           1000    with tax code O1(17.5%)
                       ABC           5678             1000      With tax code O0(NO TAX)
                       DEF           2345           1000      with tax code O1(17.5%)
    When I post a vendor invoice through FB70 for the above data. the posted document line items will be as below.
           Customer account    G/L account     Tax account      Profit center     Amount
              123                                 3350
                                XYZ                      5678           1000   
                       ABC                      5678             1000     
                       DEF                     2345           1000                
                                224706      5678             175
                                               224706      2345            175
    When I observe this document in 'General ledger view' I am able to see all the above lines as it is in 'Entry view'
    That means the summarization at "Entry view" is working fine I believe.
    Now with the same data if I post a document through  BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST, in "General ledger view" again the tax lines
    are getting splitted into two lines across profit centers as shown below
        Customer account    G/L account     Tax account      Profit center     Amount
              123                                 3350
                                XYZ                      5678           1000   
                       ABC                      5678             1000     
                       DEF                     2345           1000                
                                224706      5678            87.5
                                               224706      2345           87.5
                                224706      5678            87.5
                                               224706      2345           87.5
    Itseems the summarization is not happenning at "General ledger view" level.
    Does any body have faced the similar situation? Is there any OSS note which can rectify this? or what is causing for this problem?
    Regards,
    Nanda.

    Hi
    Maintain defult profit center in t .code :3keh
    only for balance sheet Gl accounts only
    lenin

  • Finance General Ledger dashboards data is missing.

    Hi,
    I have noticed a strange behaviour related to data loads and data visibility through the Financials Analytics dashboards.
    Let me please begin with an empty target schema.
    I run the first load having the General Ledger subject area (Full Load=Y). When it's successfully completed, I can see data in most of the tabs of the GL dashboard. In the Profitability dashboard, I can see P&L statement with data.
    However, when I run further loads for other subject areas like - paybales, receivables, revenue, cost of goods sold, supply chain, etc., I see, gradually, empty GL dashboard across its tabs. I can not see the P&L statement with data, too.
    I take an export of the schema at the end of each load and create a log for each of the export. I compare the logs and can conclude that there is no loss of data (W_GL_OTHER_F) because of, may be, the next loads that I usually do. There is no data in W_TAX_XACT_F from the first load. I notice that due to the next loads more tables are populated with data or the tables with the data have more rows. So, there is no reduced number of rows in the tables because of the next loads.
    When I 'modify' the reports in BI Answers by removing all the filters, I see no data, there, too.
    Does anyone have an idea what the is the issue here? Am I looking at the right database tables?
    Please let me know.
    Thanks and regards,
    Manoj.
    Edited by: mandix on Oct 8, 2008 4:48 AM

    Hi,
    Adding an input to my message.
    I created the same target schema in a different database and imported the first dump (GL subject area, full load = Y) into this. I am now pointing to this schema via the ODBC datasource on the BI Server server. It shows me all data in all the tabs of the GL dashboard and also, I can see the P&L statement in the Profitability dashboard, too.
    So, after the first load, I can see the data in GL dashboard tabs and the P&L statement but once more subject areas are loaded, then the GL data and P&L statement disappears. My issue still remains.
    Edited by: mandix on Oct 8, 2008 4:52 AM

  • Problem with General Ledger Budget Load

    Hi All,
    We are experiencing an issue wherein the Budget figures for general ledger are incorrect in the cube. The data-flow is 0FI_GL_10 to DSO (daily delta) to Cube (daily delta). There is a singular DSO and Cube for Actuals and Budgets. The figures in the DSO tally with R3. The delta from the DSO to the Cube is using Active Data Table of the DSO using DTP. The contents of the cube are exactly similar to those of Active Data Table i.e the new and old records both reach the cube and hence the inconsistency. I tried to do a selective deletion for a particular fiscal period from the cube and then doing a full update using both the Active Data and Change Log tables but the results are still the same. All key figures u2013 0BALANCE, 0DEBIT and 0CREDIT look affected. My questions are u2013
    Is using Active Data Table rather than Change Logs for delta the reason behind this ?
    Why is it only the Budget that is affected, Actuals and other versions look fine.
    Do we need a different data-flow (like a daily delete and load into a separate cube) for Budgets ? Does SAP suggest something specifically for Budget loads.
    Why does selective deletion for a particular fiscal period not working, do I need to do it for the entire fiscal year ?
    Your expert opinion on this is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Saurabh Diwakar
    Edited by: Saurabh Diwakar on Sep 19, 2010 10:57 AM

    HI ,
    may be you can take a look at the following SAP notes , it might help
    Note 1002272 - NewGL-DataSource 0FI_GL_10, 3FI_GL_*: Records missing in BI
    Regards,
    Sathya

  • Line Items Data Source for General Ledger

    Hello everybody,
    I'm trying to generate a Data Source for Line Items (new General Ledger) in transaction FAGLBW03. When I generated a Total Record-Data Source, everything was done correctly. When I try to generate a Line Item-Data Source, I receive following error message: "Extractors for general ledger documents are not yet supported". I was looking for any SAP notes that would explain this issue, but I couldn't find anything.
    Could you please tell me how can I generate Data Source for Line Items? Add some SP, use some another transaction, ...?
    Thank you for any help
    Janule

    Hi,
    Can u tell me how did u solve that problem.
    i m facing same.
    /sachinkumar.

  • Drill Down Report gives an error for General Ledger.

    Hi,
    I'm using the transaction GCAC to compare general ledger with profit centre accounting.While drilling down the report for PCA, the report works fine and gets drilled down to the invoice in SAP.But I get an error when I try to drill down the report for general ledger.It gives an error GI358 i.e. No line items were selected.The diagnosis of the error message shows that pool tables have to converted to transparent tables.
    I want to know whether the error occurs beacuse of pool tables issue and if yes then how can we remove the error.
    <<removed_by_moderator>>
    Thanks,
    Sandeep.
    Edited by: Vijay Babu Dudla on Apr 27, 2009 7:04 AM

    Hi sandeep,
      Check if this is of any relevance to you:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/EN/0a/8b7415dc4ad111950d0060b03c6b76/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Oracle 11i e-Business General Ledger Lead

    Skills -- Oracle 11i e-Business General Ledger implementation
    Job description:
    High profile consulting client seeks a solid Oracle 11i GL Lead for an overseas contract position. This is an excellent opportunity for anyone seeking to gain experience overseas with a Fortune 500 company. All visa requirements will be taken care of by the company.
    Candidate must have experience implementing Oracle e-Business Suite 11i for the GL module with three+ years implementing relevant Oracle products.
    Application Team Lead for Oracle GL
    * Design the Oracle Applications configuration and RICEW component customizations to meet the business process design and application requirements.
    * Use the business process requirements to drive out application requirements and metrics.
    * Assist in defining and reviewing requirements for the application.
    * Validate the design with the stakeholders to ensure that the design satisfies the requirements.
    * Supervise client in completing designs.
    * Inform the project manager of any issues that may affect other areas of the project as discovered.
    * Participate in quality management reviews as outlined in the Validation Task Overview ensuring the application design and related work products satisfy the requirements.
    * Develop an application prototype and conduct conference room pilot to validate the configuration design and explore Oracle Applications gap resolution options.
    * Conduct Oracle Applications training for conference room pilot participants.
    * Participate in transitioning the designs to the programmers and ensure a clear and complete understanding of the designs.
    * Understand that this role is more focused on the overall process flow and user experience than the integration solution designer role.
    * Provide status to project management regarding the process area.
    * Knowledge of the functionality provided by Oracle Applications
    * Ability to transform customer requirements into a workable design at the functional and/or technical levels
    * Ability to translate functional requirements into technical terms relevant to Oracle Applications to coordinate and assist with the detailed technical design tasks
    * Facilitation experience for conducting user design and review sessions and running stakeholder agreement meetings
    * Familiarity with Joint Application Design (JAD) session, Conference Room Pilot (CRP), and similar approaches and principles
    * Familiarity with business process design concepts and principles
    * Deep functional knowledge of Oracle Applications: configuration/development experience is not necessary, but knowledge of how functionality can be supported through the technology is needed
    * Some project management skills
    Location: Hong Kong, HK
    Pay rate: open and daily expenses will be covered with benefits
    Length: 6 months+
    Project language: is English
    NOTE: CHAINESE LANGUAGE IS MANDATORY AND ANY EXPERIENCE IN CHINA OR HONG KONG IS ADVANTAGEOUS
    Kindly apply your resume to [email protected] contact nos: India: +91-9989482244, London: +44 7799 112 005 with updated resume, contact details, pay rates and availability for the project

    Thanks to previous responder for tip regarding JDK/JRE anchor strings. I'm not sure if that is a problem. After letting the install process (java.exe) run for over an hour, I finally got past the InstantiateFile step. It looks like the process just takes a long time with no visible progress sometimes. After 5-6 hrs, it looked like the install succeeded (for the most part). There were still some errors in the error logs related to the Concurrent Manager (TNS-12541: TNS:no listener) I believe. If anyone has insight on what this error msg means, I would greatly appreciate a reply.
    The other problem I am tackling right now is how to explicitly set the Forms processing mode to HTTP rather than the default socket mode. According to the 11i docs (and Forms Developer 6i docs), you should only have to set "connectMode=HTTP" in the config file, appsweb.cfg, to make this happen. However, when I try bringing up a client form, the form hangs. So, obviously, something is amiss. A related question is whether one can run Forms in only HTTP mode and not HTTPS (and thus avoid having to install SSL). I would greatly appreciate any insight from fellow users.

  • Please Help....Need base tables link from Trade management to General Ledge

    HI,
    As per our current requirement we need to pull data from Trademanagement Module to General Ledger.
    we are able get exact data which is posted in GL.
    since we need to display only finished Items in product column. we are getting some unfinished Products also.
    is there any table which has correct link trademanagement to GL. Version R12:
    we have used the below query:
    ------------------------------------Start TM-GL Item Level-------------------------------------------
    SELECT 'FY'||substr(batch_period_name,5,2) Year
    , substr(batch_period_name,0,3) Period
    , 'Final' version
    , 'Actual' Scenario
    , ('C'||substr(account,0,3)) Company
    , ('A'||substr(account,5,5)) GL_Account
    , substr(account,11,2) BU
    , ('PC'||substr(account,14,3)) Profit_Center
    , Plan_Dist
    , decode(Product,'','No_Product',Product) Product
    , Site_No
    , currency_code
    , substr(account,18,2) Country
    , sum(nvl(accounted_dr,0)-nvl(accounted_cr,0)) Amount
    , batch_period_name
    FROM (SELECT
    gjh.currency_code
    , gjh.je_category
    , gjh.je_source
    , gjh.period_name je_period_name
    , gjh.name journal_name
    , gjb.name batch_name
    , gjh.status journal_status
    , gjh.creation_date je_created_date
    , gjL.period_name batch_period_name
    , gjl.je_line_num line_number
    , gjl.ledger_id
    , gjl.entered_dr
    , gjl.entered_cr
    , gjl.accounted_dr
    , gjl.accounted_cr
    , gjl.description
    , gjh.running_total_accounted_dr je_total_dr
    , gjh.running_total_accounted_cr je_total_cr
    , gcc.concatenated_segments Account
    , xdl.source_distribution_type
    , xdl.source_distribution_id_num_1
    , xlate.source_id_int_1
    , (select distinct segment1
    from mtl_system_items_b@ebs_link
    where inventory_item_id= ofuab.product_id ) Product
    , (select distinct HCSusesal.attribute4
    from HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL@ebs_link hcasiteall
    ,HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL@ebs_link HCSusesal
    ,HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS@ebs_link hca
    where HCSusesal.cust_acct_site_id= hcasiteall.cust_acct_site_id
    AND ofuab.ship_to_site_use_id=HCSusesal.site_use_id
    AND hcasiteall.cust_account_id=hca.cust_account_id) Site_No
    ,(select distinct hpsites.party_site_number
    from HZ_PARTIES@ebs_link hpart
    ,HZ_LOCATIONS@ebs_link hloc
    ,HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS@ebs_link z
    ,HZ_PARTY_SITES@ebs_link hpsites
    ,HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL@ebs_link hcasiteall
    ,HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL@ebs_link HCSusesal
    ,HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS@ebs_link hca
    -- ,HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL_MNC mnc
    where hpsites.location_id= hloc.location_id
    and hpart.party_id= hpsites.party_id
    and hpsites.party_site_id= hcasiteall.party_site_id
    and HCSusesal.cust_acct_site_id= hcasiteall.cust_acct_site_id
    and hpart.party_id= hca.party_id
    -- and mnc.cust_acct_site_id= hcasiteall.cust_acct_site_id
    and z.party_id= hpart.party_id
    and ofuab.ship_to_site_use_id=HCSusesal.site_use_id) Plan_Dist
    FROM gl_je_headers@ebs_link gjh,
    gl_je_lines@ebs_link gjl,
    gl_import_references@ebs_link gir,
    gl_code_combinations_kfv@ebs_link gcc,
    gl_je_batches@ebs_link gjb,
    xla_ae_lines@ebs_link xal,
    xla_ae_headers@ebs_link xah,
    xla_events@ebs_link xe,
    xla_event_types_tl@ebs_link xet,
    xla_event_classes_tl@ebs_link xect,
    xla_distribution_links@ebs_link xdl,
    xla.xla_transaction_entities@ebs_link xlate,
    ozf_funds_utilized_all_b@ebs_link ofuab
    WHERE gjh.je_header_id = gjl.je_header_id
    --AND gjh.reversed_je_header_id = gjl.je_header_id
    --AND gjh.je_header_id = gir.je_header_id
    AND (gjh.reversed_je_header_id = gir.je_header_id OR gjh.je_header_id = gir.je_header_id)
    --AND gjl.je_header_id = gir.je_header_id
    AND gir.je_line_num = gjl.je_line_num
    AND gcc.code_combination_id = gjl.code_combination_id
    AND gjb.je_batch_id = gjh.je_batch_id
    AND gir.gl_sl_link_id = xal.gl_sl_link_id
    AND xal.ae_header_id = xah.ae_header_id
    AND xah.event_id = xe.event_id
    AND xe.event_type_code = xet.event_type_code
    AND xe.application_id = xet.application_id
    AND xet.LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')
    AND xect.event_class_code = xet.event_class_code
    AND xect.application_id = xe.application_id
    AND xect.LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')
    AND xah.ae_header_id = xdl.ae_header_id
    AND xal.ae_line_num = xdl.ae_line_num
    AND xe.entity_id = xlate.entity_id
    AND xe.application_id = xlate.application_id
    AND xlate.source_id_int_1=ofuab.utilization_id
    AND gjh.je_source = 'Marketing'
    AND gjl.status='P'
    AND gcc.segment3 in ('10')
    AND gcc.segment1 <> 'C01'
    AND substr(gcc.concatenated_segments,5,1) in (4,5)
    AND gcc.segment6 not like ('SPO%')
    AND ofuab.utilization_type <> 'ADJUSTMENT'
    -- AND gcc.concatenated_segments = '101.41220.10.999.US.BAZ2503.000.0000'
    -- AND gjl.je_line_num in( 5674,5675,5676,5677)
    -- AND gjl.period_name = 'AUG-12'
    -- AND gjh.je_header_id IN (7236,7235)
    -- AND gjl.je_line_num = 3830
    AND substr(gcc.concatenated_segments,5,2) not in('40'))
    AND gjl.je_line_num in( 5674,5675,5676,5677)) PG -- 11/23/12
    GROUP BY 'FY'||substr(batch_period_name,5,2)
    , substr(batch_period_name,0,3)
    , 'Actual'
    , substr(account,0,3)
    , substr(account,5,5)
    , substr(account,11,2)
    , substr(account,14,3)
    , substr(account,21,7)
    , currency_code
    , Product
    , substr(account,18,2)
    , Site_No
    , Plan_dist
    , batch_period_name
    , 'Final'
    ------------------------------------End TM-GL Item Level-------------------------------------------
    Please help me if any body worked on this issue.
    Thanks,
    Ram

    I have find the answer for my Question...
    We can have 2 columns in ozf_funds_utilized_all_b. product_type and Product_id.
    If product_type is Family then Product_id would be the Item Category ID.
    If Product_type is Product then Product_id would be the Inventory_item_id.
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • General Ledger Reconciliation Detail Report shows a diiference

    Hi,
    I am doing a bank reconciliation in EBS and when I take out the General Ledger reconciliation report I get a difference. My understanding is that the system tries to balance my bank statement balance at a certain date to the general ledger balance after taking into consideration all the unreconciled payments and receipts. Is this correct? If yes, then could this just be a timing issue? Is their any way of ascertaining why I am getting this difefrence?
    Thanks.

    Hi.
    The difference corresponds to the amount shown in the Bank Statement Detail Report (Unreconciled).
    Octavio

Maybe you are looking for