Generate hierarchy BW 07

Hello,
How to generate hierarchy in BW07 for compounding objects.
Supriya.

Hi,
This may be hlepful.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/80/1a6736e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Hierarchy Upload from Flat files
Thanks,
JituK

Similar Messages

Generate hierarchy for an IO containing compounding

Hi Experts,
We have a requirement to generate hierarchy for an IO which is compounded to another IO.
Master data team is supplying us with hierarchy data without this compounding information.
For eg: Product is componded to Company Code, but the Product hierarchy data supplied by Master data team is Company Code independent.
Is there any options of writing ABAP logic for creating Company Code dependent hierarchy leaves in Start Routine in Transfer Rules or stand alone ABAP program?
Expecting your opinions at the earliest.
Madhu.

Hi,
this forum is for the SAP BusinessObjects BI Solution Architecture. I would suggest you post your question into the SAP BW forum or into the forum for the used reporting tool.
regards
Ingo HIlgefort

Load of hierarchies from R/3 via flat file: how to generate the flat file?

Hello,
I need to build a custom extractor for a hierarchy. The hierarchy exists in R/3, but there's no standard datasource to extract it. I know I can upload it via flat file, but I have a question related to this.
Does anyone know if there's a program (standard or custom by SAP) or function module in R/3 which allows me to generate that flat file, with the required format by BW?
I would appreciate very much any help about this topic
Thanks in advance

In CO-PA there is a way to generate Hierarchy Extractors (see Note 422175 for more details). With a Custom Program you generate a specific DataSource.
Hope it helps
GFV

Hierarchy using a flat file for a master data load.

Can anyone please tell me the steps involved in creating a hierarchy in BI 7.0. and loading the data using a flat file into the created hierarchy? I have seen some posts and weblogs but they were not helpful and i have been getting some errors which i dont know how to resolve.
Can someone please give a clear steps and procedure for this?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Naveen

Hi,
The flat file is generated in application server by executing an ABAP program in SE38.
This ABAP program contains the logic to generate hierarchy.
In our case we used a DSO to store employee & supervisors.
This program generated a flat file in tmp folder in application server
In our case, To load this flat file we created an Infosource on our master data using direct update using RSA1old Tcode
after Infosource is created right click on the InfoSource and click on Assign DataSource.
Give the Source System name
When you open this Info source you can select data source as YHIEROBJ_HIER and then activate the InfoSource.
create an Info Package to load the Hierarchy. Right click on the PC Files (Source System) and click on u201CCreate InfoPackage".
Under Extraction tab give the flat file name which is generated by the ABAP program in AL11.
Select the hierarchy which you want to load. Also, you can rename the Hierarchy after loading it. The update method is selected as u201CFull Updateu201D.
Logic for Generation of flat file & ABAP Program:
Flat file structure:
Node ID     InfoObject     NodeName     Parent ID     Date To      Date From     Language
u2022     u201CNode IDu201D indicates the unique number which defines the Node.
u2022     u201CInfoObject u201Cgives the name of the InfoObject which is assigned to this Node ID.
u2022     u201CNodeNameu201D is the name you specify to that Node.
u2022     u201CParent IDu201D is the Node ID to which the Current Node ID reports to.
u2022     u201CDate Tou201D and u201CDate Fromu201D are taken for time references (You can set them constant).
u2022      u201CLanguageu201C is set to English (E).
The program Logic can be :
Declare the hierarchy structure
Get the data from DSO into internal table
Read all the EMP values into NodeName Field of the table
Build lookup table for Parent Node ID
Fill Parent Node ID field
Append this data to work area & then to another internal table
You need to declare the selection parameter as SSFILE1
& use following code to write back the file
OPEN DATASET SSFILE1 FOR OUTPUT IN TEXT MODE ENCODING DEFAULT
     MESSAGE MSG.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
    MESSAGE E008(ZBW1) WITH MSG.
ENDIF
Populate the output from that internal table into final work area.
Transfer this final work area to the ssfile1 which is the desired output file.
and   CLOSE DATASET SSFILE1.
When this program is executed, selection screen asks for the name of file
Enter the desired file name & execute
flat file would be generated in the Application server now.
To view the File, Go to Transaction AL11. Search the directory /tmp. Double click on this directory.
This opens the list of flat files under this directory. Double click on the file name.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Rashmi.

Generated authorizations on 0ORGUNIT - Time-dep.hier.struct&Temp.hier. join

Hello gurus,
We use generated hierarchy authorization for 0ORGUNIT with Time dependent heirarchy structure & Temporal hierarchy join.
Authorization objects (RSR_*) seems to generate well, however they don't work - query ends with EYE 007 message.
If I make a copy of generated authorization object and split it into two objects - one with very the same 0ORGUNIT limitation and the rest of original auth. object, it suddenly works!
So I don't know what's wrong whether the generation of authorization or evaluation process.
We use EHP1 with 05 support package.
BR
Ondrej

Ondrej,
Please refer to the below post, it is helpful.
Re: BI HR Structural Authorizations
Also, refer to the below document. It is old but provides very useful steps to be followed.
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/business-intelligence/a-c/bw_hr%20authorization%20-%20asap%20for%20bw%20accelerator]
Update your findings.
-Mann

Hierarchy with several characteristics

Hi,
I want to create a display layout with cost center and cost element hierarchies in the lead column. But the issue here is BW hierarchy structure is getting disturbed because i have two characteristics in the lead column. System is generating hierarchy combinations on its own.
For each cost center node in the hierarchy, i want whole cost element hierarchy to be displayed. It is just like BW report when we have CC and CE in rows restricted by hierarchy variables.
Is this possible in BPS?
Bindu

Hi,
Let me explain my question with example.
Say costcenter has the following structure.
cost center
   Node1
     CC1
     CC2
    Node2
     CC4
     CC5
and cost element as
Node1
     CE1
     CE2
Node2
     CE3
Now i want my layout to display the data in the follwing manner.
cost center          cost element      amount
costcenter           costelement           300
node1                 costelement          100
                           Node1                    30
                              CE1                    10
                              CE2                    20
                           Node2                    70
                              CE3                    70
    CC1                costelement          100
                           Node1                    30
                              CE1                    10
                              CE2                    20
                           Node2                    70
                              CE3                    70
    CC2                 costelement            0
                           Node1                     0
                              CE1                     0
                              CE2                     0
                           Node2                     0
                              CE3                     0
Node2                 costelement          200
                           Node1                    60
                              CE1                    20
                              CE2                    40
                           Node2                   140
                              CE3                   140
     CC3                costelement         200
                           Node1                    60
                              CE1                    20
                              CE2                    40
                           Node2                   140
                              CE3                   140
Means for each node of the cost center, whole hierarchy of cost element should be displayed.
Is this possible in BPS?
Thanks,
Bindu
Edited by: Bindu on Jul 3, 2008 2:30 PM

Supplier Hierarchy issue

anyone have idea to map 0XALSUPPA (Source System Supplier (parent) (ERP).
As far as I understood this field is to enable supplier hierarchy in SPM.
We are using datasource method to map from ECC but 0XALSUPPA (Source System Supplier (parent) (ERP) is not part of datasource (Z_SADSERPSUPPLIER)?
Rgds,

Hi Sathyasree,
Its not easy to populate the hierarchy table directly in BW. Instead follow the suggestions mentioned above. Populate the parent attribute in the master data object and use the SPM program to generate hierarchy. The program to be used is "RSXSA_HIERARCHY_UPLOAD", the values you need to pass this program are:
Upload ID: just use 1
Hierarchy name: Provide a valid hierarchy name
Info-object: is the characteristics on which you want to create a hierarchy (0XARLSUPP, 0XAREWCCAT, ETC...)
Hierarchy-bearing attribute: This is the attribute which will provide a valid parent ID
Hierarchy root node: Root node of the hierarchy.
This program is called in few SPM process chains (0ASA_XA_P14, 0ASA_XA_P04, 0ASA_XA_P27), these should give you a good idea of how this program works.
Limitations of the above program for now.
1. Make sure this is one and only record where the ID and the parent match, this is basically the root node of your hierarchy.
2. Text nodes are not supported at the moment to create a hierarchy.
3. External characteristics are not supported to create a hierarchy.
4. The ID provided in the parent attribute has to be a valid master data ID.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Rohit

Error in updation of location products in Hierarchy

Hi
While generating hierarchy in APO, I have already 3 location products available for a particular hierarchy. I went into change mode, added one more location product and updated the hierarchy. It got saved. I could able to see the new loc product in the screen. But when I come back from the screen and again enter the transaction, the newly added item is missing.
Even I have added the item in the active model also, but still i am facing the same problem.
Could any one throw some light on this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
R. Senthil mareeswaran.

Hi all,
I got the solution, before updating location product, location has to be updated, then system is picking up.
Thanks to all.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Heading level hierarchy errors when topics are in TOC more than once

I have discovered that the hierarchy in the Heading levels in
the Printed Documentation will differ from than in my online help
table of contents hierarchy, and that the problem is due to topics
that are intentionally in the TOC more than once.
For example, in chapter 5 of a particular help system the
hierarchy should be:
Heading 1 < Chapter 5 title from top-level book>
Heading 2 <title of second level book>
Heading 3 <title of topic that appears under second-level
book>*
What I actually get is:
Heading 1 < Chapter title from top-level book>
Heading 2 <title of second level book>
Heading 4 <title of topic that appears under second-level
book>*
* This same topic appeared in an earlier chapter. In that
chapter it was really at a Heading 4 level.
Due to company styles, etc. we use a numbering system at the
headings and in the TOC, so instead of
5
5.1
5.1.1
I erroneously get
5
5.1
5.1.1.1
This type of hierarchy issue appears multiple times in this
particular document (which I inherited by the way.)
Other than restructuring the document to not reuse topics in
different places in the TOC, is there a solution or a workaround
for this problem?
What I am doing so far, is generating the Print Documentation
one chapter at a time. As long as a topic is not reused with the
same chapter, my hierarchy of heading levels is maintained;
otherwise, it is not. Then I can put the chapters back together
after fixing the few places that still have heading level problems.
This however, will be quite cumbersome as this document is
translated into nine other languages.
I am using RoboHelp X5 for Word / Word 2003 for the source
and most of the translations; RoboHelp Asian Edition, Simplified
Chinese / Word 2003 for the Chinese translation. The heading level
hierarchy error occurs in both versions.

>> AF: I've commented in sections...
Without Maintain Heading Levels, RH will apply heading levels
to the books and then the topic levels will get bumped down. So a
top level book will be Heading 1 and the Headings in the topic will
get bumped down to 2, 3 and 4 etc. If then you have another book
one level down so that it gets Heading 2 applied, the same topic
but under the level two book would then get 3, 4 and 5 applied.
That is not the original problem but hopefully we are agreed
that is how things work on that.
>> Yes - that is the expected behavior. When it didn't
happen as expected, that's what led me to the discovery of the
cause of the problem (topic reuse).
Your problem was that firstly Heading 3 got bumped to Heading
4 if the same topic was inserted into the TOC twice. I assume it
was OK in the first instance, or is it that when you add it twice
it goes wrong everywhere?
>> Your assumption is correct. First occurrence is
correct. Second, third, and fourth (yes - there is one topic that
is used 4 times! ) are not correct based on TOC hierarchy.
On the numbering, nothing surprises me. If you look at my
site you will see that for RH HTML, i gave up on getting it right.
I have had many queries on this and more than a few people have
indicated they will work on the problem and get it working. I'm
still waiting. There are many posts about outline numbering
problems. Has anyone got it working satisfactorily?
>> I don't really have numbering problems. The
numbering is following the RoboHelp-generated hierarchy and the
.dot template that I apply. It's just that the RH-generated
hierarchy and its heading levels don't correspond to the "real"
hierarchy because of the reuse issue.
I have seen various Word gurus maintain that numbering has
not worked entirely satisfactorily since Word 2! Also enough posts
to convince me this is a Word issue, not a RH issue.
If you want to create a new project and knock something up
that demonstrates this problem, by all means zip it up and send it.
I'll assume it will be a small project and zip to less than 5mb. If
more, contact me first.
>> Unless you have RoboHelp X3 Asian Edition,
Simplified Chinese, there is really no need. I plan to either avoid
the reuse issue in the source, or build the print doc in sections
which is easy enough in RoboHelp X5 for the non-Chinese languages.
It is in the older Asian edition where the problems are compounded
by the omitted reuse topics. If you do have RoboHelp X3 Asian
Edition, Simplified Chinese and want to experiment, I can send you
a cut-down version of the project. Don't feel obligated though;
unless you can read Chinese (I can't) it is very tedious to work
with.

Error while Creating "Create As Of" versions

Hello,
I thought of finally starting to make sure of the "Create As of" feature of DRM and generate Hierarchy Difference reports but I am having issues. When I righ-clicked my current version and clicked Create As of...
It gave me an error saying: The operation timed out - URL:http://myservername.com:11751/mdm_ntier/VersionMgr.asmx - SOAPAction:urn:UVersionMgrIntf-IVersionMgr#CreateAsOfDate.
Does anybody know what this means and/or how it may be resolved? Thanks.
-- Adi

Hi Adi,
As-Of Versions give you the ability to recreate a Version as it was at some point in its history - so if you had a Working Version which is being continually updated but you decided that all updates done in the last week were invalid you could recreate it as it was at the end of the previous week without the invalid updates. It is the equivalent of taking the Baseline version and applying all Transaction log entries up to the point where you want it. If you create the As-Of version and as of now it is equivalent to doing a Copy to New.
Not sure why you can't save As-Of versions - may be there's a technical version or may be it is just to emphasise that you're getting a new version without any history from the As-Of.
Ed

Olap Universe Based on BEx Query - Cascading Prompt

I need to get two prompts: 1) Division 2) Group. Division has to be selected first and then Group. I understand I have to create cascading prompt. In the universe, in default hierarchy, group stands before before division. I have created a custon hierarchy like: Division, Group. I used Tools -> List of Values ->Create cascading list of values and then selected the right dimensions and then clicked on Generate LOVs. Then I have exported it to the repository. But I cannot see any reflection at the report level. So, some questions came in my mind:
1) Where can I check in the universe whether my cascading prompt has been created or not ?
2) I am using L01 Dimension. But underneath, there are two dimensions called LovDivision and LoVDivisionBase which are in Italic. I believe integration kit creates this. It is the same as Group. So, my question is: Am I selecting the right dimesnsions ? Or, should I select those in Italic.
3) Actually, these two prompts (variables) [along with others] are already created in BEx which I can see in my report. My plan is, if my cascading prompts work, I will tell the BW developer to remove those two. Do you think that these existing prompts are creating any problem.
I would really appreciate your response.

Hi
1) Where can I check in the universe whether my cascading prompt has been created or not ?
Have you entered the cascading object in the webi query condition.At the run time it will generate hierarchy in the tree structure.
2) I am using L01 Dimension. But underneath, there are two dimensions called LovDivision and LoVDivisionBase which are in Italic. I believe integration kit creates this. It is the same as Group. So, my question is: Am I selecting the right dimensions ? Or, should I select those in Italic.
correct you are using right objects L01.By mdx driver it will create by default L00 and L01 objects.neglect the Lo00 objects.You can hide them in the universe or go to refresh structure and their is option to replace L00 definition with some other definition.
3) Actually, these two prompts (variables) along with others are already created in BEx which I can see in my report. My plan is, if my cascading prompts work, I will tell the BW developer to remove those two. Do you think that these existing prompts are creating any problem.
By default when you are creating universe based on the mdx drivers it will convert Bex query filters in the universe condition as mandatory filter and applied on the full universe.
You can go to the universe condition and open the condition and unchecked the option from their and after that these will not prompt in the webi query.
Thanks,
Amit

Heirarchical Trees

Developer 6.0.5.0.2 Forms
Windows NT4 Service Pack4
ORACLE 8.0.5 on sun solaris server
I am attempting to build a tree via a record group.
The property sheet for the tree asks for a record group.
What structure does the record group (or query that creates the
record group) need to be in to populate the tree?
Thankyou
null

Hello-
I've been using Hierarchy Trees for a few weeks now and thought
I would be able to help you out a bit if you need it.
I've used queries, record groups, tables, views and cursors to
generate hierarchy trees of depths up to 5 levels.
To date, I've found that the table/view is the fastest way to
go. Of course, you need to create your hierarchy organization
in a flat file format in order to use a table or view as the
Htree's source (I used a big Union query with multiple reference
keys to keep things straight).
I've found that the more elements you auto-expand (initial state
value) the longer it takes to render the object. One Tree that
took over a minute to generate with all nodes expanded (5
levels) took only 3 seconds when only the top level (root node)
was expanded.
What I don't understand is why Oracle didn't create the tree in
a way that allows you to use a non-flat file arrangement for
your hierarchy data feed. Allaire created a nice hierarchy tree
control (using Java) in their Cold Fusion application (database
applications for the web) that allows you to write a single
query to feed the entire tree using the format
value="value1,value2,value3" Display="display1, display2,
display3" instead of doing each level on its own the way Oracle
forces it. Look into Cold Fusion if you're looking for a
comparable internet-based hierarchy tree control.
S-
Lakhbir Kang (guest) wrote:
: Developer 6.0.5.0.2 Forms
: Windows NT4 Service Pack4
: ORACLE 8.0.5 on sun solaris server
: I am attempting to build a tree via a record group.
: The property sheet for the tree asks for a record group.
: What structure does the record group (or query that creates
the
: record group) need to be in to populate the tree?
: Thankyou
null

Report for Location Product hierachy creation

Anyone knows a report which can automate the location product hierarchy? (Assuming Location hierarchy and product hierarchy exists). The screen where I could maintain the hierarchy do have the generation capability. We are looking for similar feature but batch one (with possibility of selection).
Shibu

hi - have you maintained a product-location hierarchy structure in customization? Hierarchy structures, generated hierarchy structures are based on other hierarchy structures (generated or independent - can be product/location in your case).
The initial screen for maintaining hierarchy structures is divided into two areas. The area on the left shows a tree structure in which you select the part of the structure you wish to maintain, while the area on the right consists of a table containing all the structures you have maintained, and in which each line represents a structure. You can change existing structures in or add new ones to this table.
hope this helps.
regards
Vinod

Connect by prior problem

hi friends i have table like tree which have have two different type of leaf
my tables
deparment did,name
person perid,name
treetable id, pid,did,perid--tree table one row have only did or pid if did =2 , peridhave to be nullso i generate hierarchial structure between person and deparments
   id      pid       did     perid
    1     null       1        null
    2    1          null        1
    3     2         null        2
    4     2          null       3
    5     3          2          null
   6     5          null       4
    7     5          null       5for example i select first deparment's person querry result must be (id=)2,3,4 not 6,7 because 6,7 below 5
can we write with connect by prior it?

Hi,
JAVAMAN2 wrote:
hi friends i have table like tree which have have two different type of leaf
my tables
deparment did,name
person perid,name
treetable id, pid,did,perid--tree table one row have only did or pid if did =2 , peridhave to be nullso i generate hierarchial structure between person and deparments
id      pid       did     perid
1     null       1        null
2    1          null        1
3     2         null        2
4     2          null       3
5     3          2          null
6     5          null       4
7     5          null       5for example i select first deparment's person querry result must be (id=)2,3,4 not 6,7 because 6,7 below 5I'm not sure why you want to exclude 5, 6 and 7. Is it that you don't want any nodes (except the root) with NULL perid?
can we write with connect by prior it?Yes.
If my guess about excluding 5 and it's descendants is correct:
SELECT     *     -- or whatever you want
FROM     treetable
START WITH     pid     IS NULL
CONNECT BY     pid     = PRIOR id
     AND     depid     IS NULL
;If you need the names from the other tables, then outer-join both other tables, and use NVL to get the one name that is not NULL.

Master Data Setup Steps & Execution for SNP Aggregated Planning

Hi,
I need some URGENT Help on the Master Data Steps and Execution of SNP Aggregated Planning. I've read the SCM 5.0 help with quite confusing understanding from it as regards to Master Data setup.
I want to run SNP for a Group of Products at a Group of Locations (say Customer Group or Group of Distribution Centers) at an Aggregate Level & then later Disaggregate the Generated Supplies from the Aggregate Level to the detailed Product-Locations level.
I have setup a Location Hierarchy with the Group of Distribution Centers and Product Hierarchy with a Group of Products & since SNP_LOCPROD aggregation is assigned to the 9ASNP02 Planning area ... I created a LOCPROD Hierarchy which use the Location & Product Hierarchy.
The Main intention is to Improve Performance of Planning Runs at a Rough Cut / Aggregate Level by doing a Rough Cut Capacity Check & Split Distribution Center requirements to Multiple Plants producing the same product. This would also help increase the Optimizer Performance.
I am finding there is no place to run SNP Heuristic by Specifiying a Hierarchy in the Selection screen of /sapapo/snp01. So how is Aggregated Planning even run ?
(I know there are Aggregation & Disaggregation Functions available in SNP Interactive Planning ... but what do I put in the Selection as 'Hierarchies' are not available in the Selections in the 9ASNPAGGR Aggregation Planning Book).
Can someone also Provide me Detailed Steps and point me to a Detailed Training document on this ? I could not find anything on the SDN Form as well as BPX Forum as well as on Wiki site from within SDN.
Please if anybody can Guide me Urgently ? I am needing to test this quickly to Demo to someone to demonstrate the APO Capabilities (else the Customer may lose interest in APO as he is comparing functionality with another tool). I don't want this to happen.
Regards,
Ambrish Mathur

Harish,
Read your Blog with great interest. I think you have very nicely captured the Features over there. It was very helpfull.
I still have some very very basic questions (sorry if I was not clear earlier) and I will try state with an Example.
Are you saying ...
1. If I have 2 Products FG1 & FG2 .. then I need to FIRST
     create another Product Master called FG1_2_GP (say)
     via Trnx. /sapapo/mat1 ?
2. Similarly for the 5 DCs say DC1, DC2 .... DC5 ... I need
    to First Create a Location of type 1002 DC1_5_GP (say)
    via Trnx. /sapapo/loc3 first ?
I think I have not done these at all.
3. Finally are you saying that I need to now Create the
     Hierarchies ... ZCPGPROD (using FG1 & FG2)
     and ZCPGLOC (using DC1, DC2 ... DC5) and
     then create a generated Hierarchy ZCPGLOCPROD
     with Structure SNP_LOCPROD and using the ZCPGPROD
     and ZCPGLOD as Component Hierarchies ?
4. I am still not clear how would you Link Product Group
FG1_2_GP with ZCPGPROD ?? Where do we setup that FG1_2_GP is a Header of FG1 & FG2 ?
5. Similarly where do you Link Location Group DC1_5_GP with the Location Hierarchy ZCPGLOC ?
6. Finally in SNP Interactive Planning with Planning Book 9ASNPAGGR using the Location-Product (Header) as Selection what will I enter in this field ?
I read your Blog. More details on the Example would help ... I saw in your Blog the PH_POWDER product Group (containing PH_FG1,2,3 Products) example which I was not clear whether it was a New Product you created via /sapapo/mat1 or a New Hierarchy Code created via /sapapo/relhshow. Similarly you did create Location Groups PH_DC_AGG but do not seem to have used it. I think you have assigned PH_POWDER group and assigned to Locations 3000, 3100 & 3400 individually via /sapapo/mat1 ... but was not clear on how you linked it to the Location Product Hierarchies. You have also not created a Location Produc Hierarchy at all using PH_POWDER and PH_DC_AGG at all ... or have you ?
7. Is the Untold Trick that the Product Hierarchy Name and the Product Group created in Trnx. MAT1 must be same and the Location Hierarchy Name and the Location Group code created in LOC3 Trnx. should be same ?
8. I had created a Generated Hierarchy at ZCPGLOCPROD ... is this what I enter in 9ASNPAGGR as Selection of Location-Product (Header) ?
9. I want to first understand Standard SNP before I go into the diretion of creating my own Planning areas and Planning Books. Is this really needed for me to Plan 2 Products in these 5 DCs at an Aggregate level. I will be doing Aggregation of all kinds of Demand (STOs, POs, Forecast, SalesOrders, TLB Order Demand) and want the Supply generated at Aggregated Level to Disaggregate to the 2 FGs at the 5 DC Locations based on Proportion of Demand.
I think my question is far more basic wrt the Master Data Setup ... would help if you can clarify each of my questions separately in your reply. The Confusion is due to lack of clarity on the Master Data Setup in linking the Product Group PRODUCT Code & Location Group LOC Code to the respective Hierarchies and also SNP Interactive Planning not having a Place to enter these created Hierarchies.
I do want to praise and appreciate your contribution to the Blog ,,, well done. Full 10 Points Guaranteed on reply to above questions.
Regards,
Ambrish

Generate hierarchy BW 07

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for