Getting choppy footage when rendering plus "flash" frames

Hi all,
I've been using Final Cut Pro 7 for about two years for casual video editing. I use H.264 files with a framerate of 24fps and I always set sequences to fit the native format of the video files I use in them. Today, I noticed an odd "bug" when rendering video files. It's a bit hard to explain, but I'll try my best.
Let's say I take a 5-second clip from an hour-long video file and place it in the timeline. I cut off a bit of the end and add some keyframes to adjust the opacity. I then render this small piece. However, upon playback, the footage appears to "stagger", and even the playhead appears to pause for a moment before continuing on. This is confusing to me, because the footage is rendered properly, so shouldn't it play normally, like the unedited segment of the clip?
I've also had a problem with getting "flashes" of a frame that isn't meant to be in said clip. When I scroll over the clip using the playhead, this "flashing" frame is nowhere to be found.
I'm using Mountain Lion (10.8.5).
Can anyone lend a hand with this? Thanks in advance.

David and Ian are absolutely correct in their posts about the problems with trying to work with h264 quicktimes in fcp.  But the issues you are having may also have something to do with your frame rate. 
Do you mean 24 fps or 24P?  24p is actually 23.976 frames per second.  Most US video is 29.97 fps and 23.976 fps is a relatively easy conversion to 29.97 fps using "pulldown."  Early DSLR's sometimes shot exactly 24 or 30 frames per second.  New DSLR's now shoot 23.976 and 29.97.  Unfortunately, spec sheets don't always describe the frame rate accurately.   24 fps is not a standard video frame rate and there can be problems putting a 24 fps clip in a 24p sequence.
Here's a user tip describing these frame rate issues in greater detail
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-4731
If any of this isn't clear, post back.  It's complicated.

Similar Messages

  • Error when rendering for Flash

    I have had two projects crash when rendering an Encore CS3 project.
    The info in the data collection is:
    AppName: adobe encore.exe AppVer: 3.0.1.8 ModName: dvacore.dll
    ModVer: 2.0.0.60016 Offset: 0008bdb3
    Any clues?

    OK... I use Premiere Pro and then encode files with an application called Cinema Craft for m2v files. These are loaded into Encore and authored for dvd, tested and all work fine.
    With two projects, encore crashes with the error I mentioned in my first post. Others have gone through fine but are consistent with how I always create projects.
    I do work with a Matrox RXT.100 board with PP2.0 and have seen posts that PP CS# does not like rxt.100. This should not have any bearing on projects that are exported into m2v or wav and then imported into Encore CS3.
    Is it best NOT to export into an mgp format and let Encore transcode video?
    If more info is needed I would be glad to supply.

  • How to get MessageTextInput Value when rendered property is set to false.

    Hi
    Is there any way wherein i can get the value of the data populated in the messageTextInput field which has it's rendered property set to false.When I use pagecontext.getParameter("textboxname"),i can fetch the value at the time of LOV event..but once my lov event is done and I hit the go button,pagecontext.getParameter("textboxname"), returns me null.
    Can anyone suggest me how can I track the value?
    Thanks
    Puja

    Setting rendered to false would make the bean not to be available in the HTML so you cannot do a getParameter on the bean.
    if you want to read a value that is like a hidden field, try using formValueBean instead.
    Thanks
    Tapash

  • Very choppy footage when trying to edit a clip in motion 5

    Hi there, I have just recently got Motion 5 and have wanted to use it to add some tracking points to some of my footage to add some effects.  However my problem is that even importing footage into motion of a very simple 10 second camera pan shot, I can't even play it back with out it stopping a bunch and skipping frames and essentially sputtering to try and play the clip.  However the exact same clip I can pull into FCPX and edit it no problems completely smooth with no issue, even after color correction and added audio ect.  I can't figure out why it does this but Motion does this to me a lot.  Any ideas?  It's very frustrating, but if I could fix this problem I could continue experimenting with visual effects to see what motion can do for me.  Any ideas?  Thanks!

    What codec is the clip? FCPX is designed to play well with some compressed codecs that Motion will struggle with. Depending on your system, if you are working with H.264, it may cause  Motion to play back at reduced frame rates and/or inconsistently; it will work better if you first convert it to some flavor of Pro Res.
    Otherwise, consider adjusting the resolution and quality in the Render drop down menu. You could also do a RAM preview for real time playback, although you'll have to render each time you make a change.
    FWIW, I'd transcode and adjust resolution if necessary.
    Good luck.
    Russ

  • Video slips when rendered - a 24p problem?

    Hi
    I use a Panasonic DVX100B to shoot and Final Cut Studio 2 for post. On this video I am working on I make my cuts where I want them, but then if I apply any effect requiring a render, the clips slip by about 2 seconds when rendered. If a certain clip has an effect, but can play without render, then I get the slip when I export as a QT - surprise! Weirder, this only happens with some but not all of my footage.
    I think it must have something to do with the 24p Advanced Pulldown Removal. Like the missing frames confuse the render function, which goes to get its info from the wrong place.
    When I shoot 24p I can capture it with my settings as straight DV/NTSC or as 24p APR. (Usually I use capture now, as I find the camera often has trouble finding the start frame when I log first).
    When I capture DV/NTSC I get no weirdness, but all my duplicate frames are there of course and when I edit into a 24fps timeline the wrong frames are removed. (Some way to make that not happen?)
    When I capture APR I sometimes get audio out of synch, and I sometimes get this slipping when rendered problem.
    Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? I'd be so grateful to know.
    -Morgan

    sneedbreedley wrote:
    My preset in CS3 is HDV 1080p30. The stills were taken from videotaping photos with my SONY Z5U camcorder. I believe they are 1920x1080p.
    So you were using 1920 source in a 1440 preset.   You then did frame grabs to create the stills?  How did yo do that?  You may be exporting to yet a different format.
    So, rather than reverse engineering your whole workfflow; it would be easier to examine the actual source being used in the new project.  Can you provide the details on the actual assets being used?   IN CS4 it is very easy to create a new sequence in the same project with the correct aspect ratio; assuming that is the problem.  But we are still shooting in the dark since we dont know the details of your assetts.

  • Timewarp effect not applied when rendered from Media encoder CC

    The timewarp effect (enabled using console veiw in PPRO CC) does nothing to footage when rendered through Media encoder...
    It does however render when not sending it to the queue, and rendering straight from PPRO.

    Fair enough,
    Just hoping to raise attention of this...as I believe this should be a normal supported feature of PP as it once was back in CS3 days.....
    Normal frame blending interpolation doesn't really cut it, and round tripping to AE is overkill for something already built into PPro....
    But at least it's in there in some form

  • Final_cut_pro-"Error: out of memory" when rendering with hidef clips

    I keep getting this notice when rendering "error: out of memory." Both my external drive and internal drive have plenty of memory; 1.8TB and 101GB respectively. It makes no difference if I am rendering at full resolution or draft. I solved it for a while by clearing out some memory on my internal harddrive,
    but now it is back. What is going on. This didn't happen when I was working with regular definition clips but now I am working with high def. What to do?

    Drives don't have 'memory' in this context, they are storage containers.
    Check my answer to your other thread and give us more info about your rig...Hardware/Software (models/versions), how everything's connected, exact specifications of the media you're working with and sequence settings.
    K

  • Error when rendering! Desperately in need of help!

    Just out of nowhere I´m getting this error when rendering in a ProRes project:
    "Codec not found. You may be using a compression type without the corresponding hardware card"
    I have done nothing with my setup and have never had problems with this before. What can I do to fix this?

    I started getting this error after exporting prores 422 (and 422 HQ) files from AE and dropping them into FCP. It happened a couple of days ago, right after I updated to QT 7.6.2. i checked out the details on the QT update and the update seems to focus on prores 422 functionality. so i think your theory about this having something to do with the update is spot on.
    my solution was to export out of AE using photo-jpeg. it's pretty close to identical on the visual and color correctable if not. this project has the flexibility for this type of codec switch since everything originates in AE -- you may not have that flexibility.

  • How do I output the smoothest video when changing or mixing frame rates from the original footage?

    I have been experimenting with various Media Encoder settings, and wondered if there was anything else I can try to get the smoothest video output possible, especially when changing frame rate and possibly resolution.  For clarification, let me start from the beginning and explain what I'm doing and what I've tried so far.  I'll try to be as brief as possible, but if I do go into too much detail, I apologize. 
    My original footage is AVCHD 1080p - 60fps.  (my camera only does 60fps...specifically 59.94fps)  We're not talking interlaced video here, I'm staying away from that.  This is definitely full frame, progressive video at 60 frames (not fields) per second.  My output will ultimately be for the web.  I have been keeping my output codec (H.264) and bit-rate (VBR 2-pass, relatively high-bitrate) consistent, and have been trying numerous output options and even sequence settings to see what would yield the best results.  I am using Premiere Pro CS5.5 along with Media Encoder.  Here's what I've done and the results I've observed:
    1.  I created a sequence with 1080p - 59.94fps settings to match my original footage.  I then output both 1080p and 720p versions at 59.94fps, and at 29.97fps.  The 59.94fps output files looked absolutely great, as would be expected.  Extremely smooth.  The 29.97fps output files were generally smooth, but not near as smooth as the 59.94fps.  This is expected since it's half the frame rate as my original footage.  However, my question is this:  What exactly is Media Encoder doing when "down converting" from 60p to 30p?  From a technical stand point, is it dropping every other frame?  I'm just curious to understand exactly what it does.  I tried the Frame Blending option as well, and that only yielded a bit more blur to the images which wasn't desirable for any of the output files. 
    2.  Just to see what would happen, I created a sequence with 1080p - 29.97 settings.  I then output both 1080p and 720p versions at 29.97fps.  The video was much more choppy in these cases, even with Frame Blending on.  Now, I know not matching my sequence settings with my original media isn't ideal, but I again just want to understand why this yields less smooth video than the 29.97fps options above.  Why does cutting the sequence settings frame rate in half from the original, then outputting the same frame rate as the sequence yield video that is not as smooth?
    3.  Next, I wanted to try mixing frame rates to see how Premiere and Media Encoder handled the footage and output files.  Premiere handled it great, no issues there.  However, I had some interesting things happen when I output the files.  Here's what I did:  I created a sequence with 1080p - 59.94fps to match my original footage.  Then I took the same exact footage that was in my sequence, copied it in my project panel and interpreted it at both 23.976 and 29.97 fps, yielding slow motion video.  The slow motion video looked great in Premiere, so I went ahead and just added it to my sequences, along with the original 59.94 footage.  I also created separate sequences for the 29.97 and 23.976 footage respectively, each with matching sequence settings, then added a nested sequence to another original footage sequence (with 59.94fps sequence settings) to see which yielded the best results.  Basically, I'm trying to output 59.94fps that match my original footage, but also throw in some slow motion footage at different framerates.  I'll explain my results in a moment as they are a bit convoluted, however, here is my question:  When mixing frame rates and trying to output the smoothest video, am I going about this the right way?  I would assume you would use your sequence settings that match the original footage (which is what the majority of the footage will be), then bring in a nested sequence for the slow motion (as oppose to just dropping the slow motion video directly into my main sequence), and then output to the same frame rate of the majority of the footage, in this case 59.94fps. Is there a better workflow for this?
    The results to #3 above were as follows.  Initially, it looked like it didn't matter if I nested the slow motion sequence into my main sequence, or simply dropped the actual slow motion video into my original 59.94fps sequence.  It seemed to produce smooth results either way.  Frame Blending blurred the video a bit, but didn't seem to make much difference, and quite honestly I like the footage without Frame Blending in general.  However, when I closed down Premiere, and opened the output files later (opening in Quicktime), the footage looked choppy.  In fact, it would go from choppy to smooth and back, almost like it had an irregular cadence (don't know if I'm using "cadence" in the right context here).  I would then open up Premiere again, import the output footage into my project panel, and play the footage in Premiere, and it would play back smooth again. Is this a Quicktime issue?  I was playing 1080p 59.94fps files when this happened, so maybe it's just because it's a large file.  Doesn't seem to have issues with the 720p files I created.  But it sure threw me off with my testing because I then started second guessing the settings I was using.  My iMac is the latest 2011 model with plenty of RAM, so I wouldn't think it's the computer.  Thoughts?
    4.  Next, I noticed on ALL my output files (again, using the H.264 codec from Media Encoder) that the color of my video seemed to flatten quite a bit.  It seems that the original footage has more contrast and saturation than the output files.  I figured maybe this was just how it was, but when I re-imported the output files back into Premiere, they looked IDENTICAL to the original footage.  And in Media Encoder's Source/Output windows, I don't see any difference there either. Is Quicktime again the culprit here, doing some odd things to the color of my videos?
    5.  Regarding Frame Blending, when is the best situation to enable this option in Media Encoder?  I've read it is when mixing frame rates, but I honestly didn't see too much of a change except for a bit more blur, which I didn't care for.
    6.  Lastly, my conclusion is that 60fps yields the smoothest video, which is an obvious conclusion.  However, I know that 60fps isn't the best or easiet frame rate for web delivery.  It seems 30p is more the standard.  Are there any integrated web players that would play 60fps?  Can you get 60fps video on YouTube/Vimeo?  If yes to any of these questions, can they do 720p and 1080p at 60fps? 
    Those are all my questions.  I hope I am clear enough without being overly wordy and hopefully I didn't put too many questions into one post.  Thanks in advance for any insight, I really appreciate it.

    Did you ever figure out which output worked the best? I have the same original footage; trying to determine the best output settings to make a dvd for tv.
    thanks!

  • Flash frame when printing to tape?

    Ok, this has never happened to me before, I have an hour long show. The whole project is edited and rendered out in one quicktime movie.
    I'm using the final QT movie to edit to tape. At the end of a dissolve I am getting a Flash frame, the funny thing is its only happening on the tape. I have gone through the sequence frame-by-frame and there is no indication of an added frame or
    bad edit anywhere. Does anyone know why I would get a Flash frame only when I print to Tape?

    are you monitoring on a NTSC monitor or your computer. I've seen this when the flashframe is on a field the computer monitor isn't showing, but the ntsc mon will show it. The other thing is when your deck is brought out of record by hitting stop without rolling enough black prior to stopping this can happen but it sounds like you are seeing this in the sequence somewhere not at the end

  • AE CC 2014 Corrupted and Glitched frames when rendering to Quicktime

    Ever since upgrading to the newest version of After Effects, I've been getting corrupted and glitched frames when rendering videos with a Quicktime holder.  My normal workflow is rendering the video straight out of AE, but it also happens when rendering with Adobe Media Encoder, or even while using the "BG Renderer" script for AE that renders from the terminal.  It happens whether I have multiprocessing enabled or not.
    The corruption differs depending on what codec I'm using, but in the Cineform Codec it shows up as green frames:
    On DNxHD they show up as Red frames (don't have a screencap of this one but you get the idea).
    Using the QT Animation Codec they show up as static or distortion:
    I have not found a codec that does not become corrupted when encased in the QT holder.  Image sequences render out fine, and Cineform with an AVI holder renders out fine.
    Even more strangely, I can fix the problem if I link the AE composition to Premiere, then render the QT file out through Premiere itself.  The fact that Premiere calls and renders the Comp fine but AE does not, makes me think this is a bug in AE's treatment of Quicktime rather then a driver/system incompatibility on my end.  But I'm certainly willing to try any suggestions the community might have for me =]
    Specs:
    Windows 7 64-bit
    AMD Firepro V7800
    AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
    16 GB RAM
    Rendering to a local drive
    Fully Updated AE
    Latest version of Quicktime

    solutions for problems with QuickTime files in After Effects CC (12.0) because of conflict with DVCPROHDVideoOutput Quic…

  • Changing animation frame rate when rendering in photoshop does not change the length of the video?

    I made a walk cycle animation in Photoshop CS6 and want to render it into a quicktime format. I'd like it to be 12 fps, but when I rendered it at 12 fps the video seemed to be missing frames, and the video was 3 seconds long. I have 98 frames to my animation; doing the math, at 12 fps it should be 8 seconds long. Not 3.
    I was confused and for curiosity's sake I rendered the video at 6 fps, trying to really slow it down. The video ended up being STILL 3 seconds long and only maybe 20 frames. I was missing literally 70 frames. I'm so upset with this rendering thing, I could chuck my computer at the wall.
    Does anybody know of a solution to this?
    edit: If it means anything, I've tried rendering it straight from the frame view and the timeline view. Each time I render it I have the timeline frame rate match the rendering frame rate as well.

    floriannaart wrote:
    Changing animation frame rate when rendering in photoshop does not change the length of the video?
    Photoshop CS6 and CC support two types of animation Frame animations and a Video Timeline
    Changing the frame rate should not change the length of a video timeline. It should just change the number of frames that are rendered.  To change the length of a video you need to change the length of the video timeline.  If you increase the length of the timeline and there is audio I'm quite sure there will be a problem with it,  The Video part will most likely be better then the sound. The required number of extra frames can be generated however the video may look like slow motion. If you decrease the length the motion will speed up.  The length of a video is normally done be editing video clips which are trimmed and stitched together to get the desired duration. Not normally done by altering the duration of a clip.
    The duration a of Frame animation is the sum of the times each frame is displayed.  In a frame animation the length of time a frame is displayed can be varied it not a normal motion picture video.  To have a smooth frame animation you need a sufficient number of frames that are different from each other to show smooth motion.  You can use Photoshop Frame animation tween feature to have Photoshop manufacture frames to help with a smoothing the animation.   Once you have a frame animation the length with the motion you want you can have Photoshop convert it to a video timeline and render a normal motion picture video.  It will not have audio but you can add audio to it.

  • The picture gets choppy when I rotate the apple motion

    The picture gets choppy when I rotate the apple motion. What can I do to prevent this? Good tips received with great thanks.

    Have you rendered it fully in FCP?
    -DH

  • Why do I get "Publish Failed" when I select F4V with fixed frame rate?

    I have created several projects from scratch in Captivate 5. My publishing functionality seems to be increasingly impaired. I have rebooted and uninstalled + reinstalled Captivate 5.
    In the beginning I got this message when I was publishing a specific project with the media option F4V with fixed frame rate, but now I am getting it on all my projects regardless of my publishing selections.
    I am running on Windows 7, and I think it is Windows that is suggesting that I 'debug' the program. Clicking 'Debug' takes me to a dialog box where I can choose between Visual Studio 2005 or Visual Studio 2008, none of which seem to be a good solution.
    Here is a print of my publishing options:

    Chinmay Baid,
    Thank you for your reply - over the past few days I have been able to
    narrow the problem down a little more.
    When working with Captivate 5, I am able to work with and open any
    published file until I turn that file into a Zip file.  Upon unZipping,
    the file becomes unusable by my computer and by my LMS (Cornerstone).
    I am using Adobe Flash Professional CS5 and I am able to run any SWF file
    on my machine if the file has never been zipped.  I am using Captivate 5
    in administrator mode.  Somehow, the zip process is making the files
    unusable, and my LMS requires that files be zipped before they can be
    uploaded.
    Thank you for any advice or help you may be able to offer.
    Daniel Spray
    Instructional Design Specialist
    United Spermarkets, LLC
    806.791.6329
    From:   Chinmay Baid <[email protected]>
    To:     Daniel Spray <[email protected]>
    Date:   03/03/2011 05:09 AM
    Subject:        Why do I get "Publish
    Failed" when I select F4V with fixed frame rate?
    Hi,
    Can you please give the following details :
    Can you please check and tell the Flash player version
    (plugin,activex,standalone) installed on your machine?
    Also, are you able to play the standalone SWF on your machine?
    Did you launch Adobe Captivate 5 in administrator mode?
    Above information might be helpful for further investigation.
    Regards
    Chinmay Baid
    http://blogs.adobe.com/captivate

  • Frame Rate Convertor results in choppy footage

    I have some 60fps footage shot on the HVX200 at 720p/24pN that I wanted to use in slow mo, buuuut, after importing it into FCP 5.1.4 using the DVCProHD 720p/24 easy setup (without removing the advanced pulldown and duplicate frames) I get very choppy footage aftern running the FRC. I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong. Someone please help!!!!!!
    Thanks
    K

    OK, just did something to make me feel like a complete idiot. I decided to follow my own advice and RTFM for the Cam. It seems that on the HVX 200 you have to make sure that two settings are correct for VFM recording. First, set cam to 720/24pN or 30pN and THEN, goto the Scene File and set the Frame Rate there to whatever you desire.
    I had skipped this last step and just the recording format to 720/60p. That will not work and now I know this.
    I can't wait to test this the correct way and see what I get.
    Thanks for all the help.
    K

Maybe you are looking for

  • Number of elements in TDMS file

    Is there a way to determine the number of elements in a TDMS file?  The files I am creating have several signals all of the same length.  The only way I can think of is to do this is put it in a loop and read one element at a time until it reaches th

  • Trade Promotion (Trade promotion type does not allow structured products)

    Hi Friends, In TPM when we try to remove a product from promotion and when we are entering a new product we are getting the error"Trade promotion type doesnot allow structured products". Please tell me how do we solve this issue. Regards, JAN.

  • Any main version updates on the horizon

    I think EA cc has been out for over a year now, any chatter about cool new features being released sometime soon :-)

  • Search & Replace function in Files?

    Does there exist a "Search & Replace String" function for Files IO? ...preferable RandomAccessFile. Or do I have to make my own parser from scratch. Anyone know of free code that exists somewhere? This seems like a function that someone must have mad

  • Report expired

    I am using 11.2.0.1.0 is there a way to report or list expired backups ? Thank you. --Harvey