GI:How to set Indicator:Item Not Relevant for Goods Movements LIPS-NOWAB
Hi,
does anybody know what i have to do to get the Indicator: Item Not Relevant for Goods Movements set for a good issue delivey position? (Table LIPS field NOWAB)
thanks in advance
Steffen
Hi,
the thing is the following (maybe it doesn't work at all, i don't know) :
a) i have a "Non-stock" material (e.g.material type NLAG)
b)this material should be picked, so it should be relevant for the delivery (e.g.item category TAX)
c) for a special reason the "Total goods movement status" in the outbound delivery header shouldn't be "Not relevant", therefore i assigned the item category TAX to a shedule line category that has a movement type (e.g. CN)
d)but the bad thing is, that the customer has set the indicators "quantity updating" and "value updating" for the material type NLAG, and so the goods issue posting gets some errors. eg.g missing storage location etc.)
During debugging i found a coding that checks the sign NOWAB of lips, the documentation says:
"You can use this indicator to control whether the item is relevant for goods movement when the delivery is still being created.
When this indicator is set, goods movement is not posted for this item - regardless of the movement type assigned to it."
So i head the idea it might be possible to set this indication (Lips-nowab) somewhere in the sales order or somewhere else but maybe this conflicts with point c) above .
Maybe shomeone knows what to do or has a better idea.
Best regards
Steffen
Similar Messages
-
VL01N - indicator: Item not relevant for goods movements
Hello Everyone
When creating a new delivery, into the administration tab of the Item detail, there is an indicator:
"No goods movement" into the control data box.
Based on SAP help:
When this indicator is set, goods movement is not posted for this item - regardless of the movement type assigned to it.
My problem is: that field is not selectable(It is in grey). So we cannot change it. How can we set that field?
Regards
stjacqdDear Dstj,
Check the movement type before that No Goods Movement check box it should be 601 for outbound delivery.Due to wrong movement type check box get activated.
If you are allow to chenge that movement type then change and try.
If movement type is incorrect then take help of MM consultant to set the movement types properly.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.
Edited by: Murali Mohan.Tallapaneni on Nov 15, 2008 6:52 AM -
No Goods movement (LIPS-NOWAB) setting
Hi All,
As per our specific business process in 4.6 C , I have configured no Goods movement indictor setting default by new confirmation control key with un-checking 'GR assignement'
Inbound delivery will be processed and get the document flow as Service confirmation - Completed for LPA document.
Issue we are facing is since Inb dely not relevant for good movement, in MD04 Inbound dely shown as MRP element status Intransit which is causing more lines piled-up in MD04. On long run this will cause issue on MD04.
I got ref from prev threads
maybe OSS notes Note 201655 - Goods movement relevancy of inbound deliveries f. POs (This is not relevant for 4.6C)
and Note 704274 - Inbound delivery item relevant for distributn but not for GR
So how do we control piling up Inbound dely lines in MD04 as MRP elements?
Really appreciate your response!
Thanks
Sivamaybe OSS notes
Note 201655 - Goods movement relevancy of inbound deliveries f. POs
and
Note 704274 - Inbound delivery item relevant for distributn but not for GR
can help you further
the mentioned OMGZ transaction does not exist in newer releases, this is actually the customizing of confirmation control for purchase orders -
Line item not relevant for payment release
Dear Expert,
When I select payment block : 'Payment Request' in FB60. Error Message appear "Line item not relevant for payment release".
I also have set payment block in master vendor and OBB8.
Can you tell me why the error message still appear?
Kindly need your help
Thanks and Regards,
YLDo you have any workflow variant in place?
Moreover, when you have already set the Payment block at Master level, you need not to fix it in transaction level.
Vendor itself will not get paid until unless you remove the block option
Thanks -
The Reservation item is not allowed for goods movements
Hi Experts,
When i do the goods movements against the reservations in
MIGO, I encounter the below error.
The reservation
xxxxxxx item xxxx is not allowed for Goods Movement.
Can you please suggest on this.
Regards,
Venkat.What is the message number ?
Can you please check the goods movement allowed for reservation in MB22 : -
Order not found or not permitted for goods movement
Hi,
I try to implement Goods Movement by using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE. I try to do it over delivery number. So I use the following code. But somehow it returns "Order not found or not permitted for goods movement" error. I can do the same movement over MIGO transaction. But BAPI can not find the order. Do you have any idea? Do I miss a parameter o something?
Thanks.
data: begin of gmhead.
include structure bapi2017_gm_head_01.
data: end of gmhead.
data: begin of gmcode.
include structure bapi2017_gm_code.
data: end of gmcode.
data: begin of mthead.
include structure bapi2017_gm_head_ret.
data: end of mthead.
data: begin of itab occurs 100.
include structure bapi2017_gm_item_create.
data: end of itab.
data: begin of errmsg occurs 10.
include structure bapiret2.
data: end of errmsg.
data: wmenge like iseg-menge,
error_code(220) type C,
temp_xchpf like mara-xchpf,
sbatch like mseg-charg.
DATA : temp_vbeln LIKE likp-vbeln.
gmhead-pstng_date = sy-datum.
gmhead-doc_date = sy-datum.
gmhead-pr_uname = 'sy-uname.
gmhead-VER_GR_GI_SLIP = '1'.
gmhead-VER_GR_GI_SLIPX = 'X'.
gmcode-gm_code = '01'. " for 101
itab-mvt_ind = 'F'.
itab-plant = '0001'.
itab-entry_qnt = AMOUNT.
itab-move_type = '101'.
itab-item_text = 'invoice'.
itab-deliv_numb = temp_vbeln.
APPEND itab.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
EXPORTING
goodsmvt_header = gmhead
goodsmvt_code = gmcode
goodsmvt_headret = mthead
TABLES
goodsmvt_item = itab
return = errmsg.
CLEAR error_code.
LOOP AT errmsg.
IF errmsg-type EQ 'E'.
error_code = errmsg-message.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
IF error_code IS INITIAL.
COMMIT WORK.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
error_code = 'Commit error'.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ERROR_C = error_code.Dzed,
I set item information but I'm still getting error.
Actually I didn't understand the difference between applying goods movement over delivery number or po number. What is the difference between them?
If I try to use only deliv_num & deliv_item data, BAPI looks for PO and finds nothing and gives error. But when I use PO number and item for goods movement, this time it is still impossible to be successfull(another error). So I decided to use both delivery number and PO together in BAPI; so I filled those fields:
po_number
po_item
deliv_numb
deliv_item
But as you may guess, no success.
There are also another fields for delivery :
deliv_num_to_search
deliv_item_to_search
I have no idea what are they for.
And also there's another field in BAPI header:
red_doc_no
Maybe I have to use this field to pass delivery number. I'm not sure. I'm confused. -
MIGO not permitted for goods movement
Hello gurus
When I tried doing Goods Issue on an order (movement type 261), an error came up saying that the order was not found or not permitted for goods movement
What would be the cause of this? How can I remedy it?
Thanks in advance, points assuredHi,
This is because the Order may be not released.
Release the order and proceed further.
Regards,
Siva -
Intercompany stock transfer - Item not relevant for billing
Hi Experts,
please can you help me in Intercompany stock transfer billing. I set up all customizing for Intercompany stock transfer, checking also with all OSS notes available.
When I try to invoice Stock Transfer Delivery (created from Stock Transfer Purchase Order) with VF01, system issues the message "F044 The item is not relevant for billing".
As per standard setting, billing relevance on Stock Transfer Delivery item category is "D".
Thank you very much
Kind Regards
AndreaCheck your copying control setting for Delv to Billing in VTFL (LF - IV)
Header:
Copying requirements - 014 - Hdr dlv.rel.IC bill.
Item:
Copying requirements - 015 - Itm dlv.rel.IC bill.
Data VBRK/VBRP - 001- Inv.split (sample)
Also, check for your I Cat that has billing indicator is active.
Thanks & Regards
JP -
Statistical SO line item not relevant for billing
Hi,
For a Replacement Order, when we tried to create a Proforma Invoice from a delivery document , I am getting the below error
"59659855 00010 Statistical SO line item 73478344 0003 not relevant for billing"
The Item category is Free of Charge Item
Billing Relevance Indicator is D (Relevant for Proforma)
In Delivery Document, The Intercompany Billing Status field is Relevant.
Can any one let me know how to create Proforma Invoice for that.Dear Jayavardhana,
Go to VOV7 transaction select your itemcategory then go in to the details here you check the field Statistical Value is there any values maintained, maintain this field as blank then try.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali. -
VL06G item not relevant for picking
Hi Gurus,
I have a delivery with a single item that is not relevant for picking and I cannot see it in VL06G.
I don't understand why.
In the selection screen the report WS_MONITOR_OUTB_DEL_GDSI has picking status 'C' or Blank.
So it should display also my delivery, that has picking status = blank
Thanks for your kind help
FrancescoHello Francesco
I don't know which version of SAP you are in.
However I found an OSS note that's relevant upto Version 4.6C, which says the following:
" However, it is not possible, for example, to include the picking status ' ' (Not relevant) in the selection, because this represents an enhancement of the standard selection range. ".
I am thinking it may still work the same way as it is a conceptual matter.
Please review this
398014 - VL06: Selection criteria for delivery statuses
I will check if there is a note relevant for ERP 6.0 which says the same thing.
Hope this helps. Good luck. -
Service item not relevant for pricing if used with higher level item catego
Hi,
We have a service item e.g S900 with Item category ZTAD.
This line Item automatically creates a Service Order.
Requirement is , if this service item is used with an Equipement Item,
Item 10 --> Equipment
Item 20 --> Service
--> There would be price required for the Equipment ( Condition type ZPRO - Mandatory )
--> System should not ask for the price of Service Item, as it would be inclusive in the Equipmetn charges.
--> In short if the Service item is used as Sub item with Equipment, it is not relevan for pricing.
I tried copying ZTAD and creating a new item cateogry which is not relevant for pricing...would that be the correct approach, but facing several issues related to Automatic Service order generation.
what could be possible ways to achieve above.
Regards
Trupti DeulkarHi,
System will ask the price for item category TAD bcoz service also chargble,in your case insted of TAD use TANN as free,
You can define based on your higher level item category for Ex : OR + Normusage(Blank)Higherlevl item (Blank)= TAN
you can config like this ORNormUsge(Blank) + TAN = TANN
like this you can do it this correct way or els you can manually enter the item catagory (TANN) at sale order line item level.
Thanks
Vinayak.
Edited by: vinayak4all on Jul 12, 2011 2:45 PM -
Item Not relevant for Billing - due to Batch Management
Dear All ,
We have activated the Batch management and the materials are picked from the batch . When we create billing document ZF2 and ZIV using VF01 with ref to delivery , we get an message - check log - when we go to the log we see that item 900001 is not relevant for billimg n which is an warning message . This message need to be supressed .The message type - VF044.
Can you please give me your inputs on this.
Thanks and regarsd
VeeraHello Friends,
We are also facing the similar issue as -
Delivery item 900001 is not relevant for billing , message
Client: 002
Group Number
Sales Document Number : 0080106599
Item Number of the SD Document: 900002
Schedule Line Number : 0044
Counter in Control Tables : 00
Message Identification :VF
System Message Number : 044
Output Type : I
Message Variable 01
Message Variable 02
Message Variable 03
Message Variable 04
Group Type : F
As per the note 77414, we made all the settings however system is showing the same message during billing execution. In this regard could you please support to get the solution.
Best Regards,
Goutham -
Item not relevant for billing - Batch Management
Dear Experts,
I'm testing the Batch Management with the configuration detalied on the Building Block - J19 from SAP. So I've created a new item position called YG05 which is working for the batch spliting.
But now the problem is that when I'm billing with Tx VF04 or VF01 it gives me the following error and doesn't create the invoice.
VF 044 The item is not relevant for billing
Now, the problem fixes when I go to Tx VTFL and change the position TAN in the field Copying Requirements from 004 Delivery - Related Item to 003 Header / Dlv. - Related. I can do the billing, but when the system print the invoices it print for each position type, I mean this.
"Before the system printed 3 copies of the invoice, but now not only print the 3 copies, now it send printing the 3 copies and also 3 blank pages (i assume that those are por the YG05 position"
If anyone have and advice if the fix i did first is correct.... And also have a solution for this last problem. Please reply...
Thanks
Javier Sandoval Vera
Universal Sweet Industries
Edited by: Javier Sandoval on Feb 12, 2009 4:46 PMHi Javier,
for correct settings please check sap note 77414, choose your process and change your settings accordingly.
Balazs -
Item not relevant for Billing in STO case
Hi,
I have created the invoice from NL Delivery type but then i cancel the same invoice.
Now i am going to create again the invoice ,it is saying item is not relevant for invoice.
i have check everything and it is fine as Billing Relevance is "J' in item category NL.
Please let me know if any further information required.
ThanksYou have to reverse the Delivery as well after Cancelling the Billing Document.
Follow below steps
1. Go to VL09 and reverse the delivery.
2. Then create Billing Doc again with ref to same delivery number.
Regards
Satya nahak -
Item not relevant for billing-Batch Split
Dear all
Item is not relevant for billing for Batch Split item. i have checked item category, item category determination and copy control.
The scenario is working fine for local and export but for deemed export the item is not relevant for billing
Please kindly guide what else to check
Regards
Sandeep BhowmickKindly check the Batch Split - Item Category in VOV7 with the Billing Relevance as "M".
Best Regards,
Ankur
Maybe you are looking for
-
Java web application and SSO in Portal
I have successfuly deployed an EAR file(Servlet/JSP) to my OC4J. In my deployment descriptor, I have added security-constraints tag to implement authenticaion using LDAP. In the process of deploying, I have also specified the LDAP associated to my OC
-
How to design a particular screen?
Hi All, In my apllication i am working on oracle forms using manually. I would to design a particular page with the following attributes as shown below? How to design sunch kind of pages. Column names Expir Reocrd Y
-
I have windows vista 32 bit, with IE 8 and the latest flash download 10.1 and cannot view video on sites like youtube. I have uninstalled and reinstalled twice, updated Java, updated shockwave and looked for IE updates but nothing is working. Can any
-
Slide Show Screen Saver Superimposed Images Flag or Ball -- Bug?
Hi, I have searched and found two other archived questions on this topic, but no real answers. Please help! I have the screen saver set to do a slide show from the Pictures folder, where I have lots of family photos. This works fine, but about every
-
How do I create a mirror image of a photo in adobe photo elements 12
I'm new to Photoshop, I have element 12 and I find no help in doing a mirror image, maybe element is not capable, anybody have any suggestions as how to do it? Message was edited by: Joe Fox