GL Balance mismatch issue in biw

Dear All,
We are facing GL balance mismatch issue in our biw production. Please suggest will be corrected this. Please look the attachments.
Regards,
Subhash

From which table of DSO are you fetching data ,the type of delta in your DSO is AIED, if its not properly sequenced, the data will be wrong, there can be multiple records with same key in one request ,properly analyze, compare the change log of this record with the active table and infocube,you will clearly understand what happened,its the way to analyze.

Similar Messages

FI GL and FI AA sub-ledger recon balance mismatch

Hi,
FI GL and FI AA sub-ledger recon balance mismatch
Year 2010 .and period 12 .. no mismatch
Year 2011 and period 01 .. there is mismatch
so I thing there was issue in year end closing. And now we are in Nov ( 11 period ) . so our special posting period is also not open to reprocess year end activity.
How should i approach to this issue.
Please guide with step by step process.
Thanks
P B

Thank you for reply,
2010 Closing and 2011 Opening balance is same.
and we are using SAP R/3 4.7 so we dont have that t code FAGLGVTR.
in ABST2 there is the difference in Balance.
2010 period 12
In GL
Begging Balance(100)
ending balance (100)
In Subledger
Begging Balance (100)
ending balance    (100)
difference between both ledgers ( 0)
But in
2011 period 1
In GL                                                                         In Subledger
Begging Balance   (100)
ending balance      (100)
In Subledger
Begging Balance ( -400)
ending balance    (-400)
difference between both ledgers ( 500)
Now i checked this
1. FS10N - GL Balance is same in 2010 period 12 and 2011 period 1
2. AR01 - Subledger Balance is same in 2010 period 12 and 2011 period 1
Q : where this -400 balance is coming from . ( where can i see or how can i identify ?)
Note :
( Program is pulling this value from Table : GLPCT )
Thanks
P B
Edited by: pbpatel on Nov 9, 2011 1:38 AM

Balance mismatching between FAGLB03 and FAGLL03?

Hello Experts,
I found difference in balance in one of my Bank payment clearing GL Account in faglb03 and fagll03 report.
But when i double click on "Cumulative balance column for any month the balance is matching with the balance of fagll03 report.
What may be the reason ?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Biswaranjan

1223997     Amounts incorrect in FAGLB03 navigation to FAGLL03 and FB03
970096     FS10N: Drilldown -> differences with active new G/L
1609283     FS10N: Drill-Down leads to differences with active splitting
1021174     FS10N: Drilldown -> differences despite Note 970096
1161837     FAGLB03: Balance <> Total of open items for OI selection
1600014 *     Balance mismatch / MSITEM033 - No items selected (see long text) / Missing line

Type mismatch issue

1) create package spec with two record type. Note : 1 attribute common in both the types
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE gfstm_parm_test AS
TYPE g_rec_1 IS RECORD
(ship_type_flag varchar2(1),
reason_code_flag varchar2(1)
TYPE g_rec_2 IS RECORD
(ship_type_flag varchar2(1),
cost_by_supplier_flag varchar2(1)
end gfstm_parm_test ;
2) create procedure with one of the record type. i.e g_rec_1
create or replace procedure test_rec_type_pr(i_rec_var IN gfstm_parm_test.g_rec_1) is
begin
dbms_output.put_line(i_rec_var.ship_type_flag);
end;
3) execute the below block for g_rec_1 by calling procedure test_rec_type_pr
ans: works
Requirement: The same procedure WITHOUT ANY MODIFICATION to be used for the other type g_rec_2 as input parameter and should print 'a'. But getting type mismatch issues.
How to make it to work ?
declare
l_rec_1 gfstm_parm_test.g_rec_1;
l_rec_2 gfstm_parm_test.g_rec_2;
begin
l_rec_2.ship_type_flag := 'a';
test_rec_type_pr(l_rec_2);
end;
Thanks,
Vinodh

Seems you'll have to uncomment something (as Solomon says, types are not defined to be intermixed at will)
declare
l_rec_1 gfstm_parm_test.g_rec_1;
l_rec_2 gfstm_parm_test.g_rec_2;
begin
l_rec_2.ship_type_flag := 'a';
l_rec_1.ship_type_flag := l_rec_2.ship_type_flag;
l_rec_1.reason_code_flag := '' -- or whatever ...
test_rec_type_pr(l_rec_1);
end;Regards
Etbin

MM / FI stock balance mismatch

I observed MM / FI stock balance mismatch,
Pls advice in this regard.
Thanks in advance
Girish

Check
Re: How to match the stock value in FI and MM.
probable reason of difference in stock bal in fi and mm

TS1702 When I go download a app, it says "credit balance mismatch" - I have $50'on iTunes - I just downloaded other apps - and to boot THIS IS A FREE APP What I'm I doing wrong?

When I go download a app, it says "credit balance mismatch"
- I have $50'on iTunes
- I just downloaded other apps
- and to boot THIS IS A FREE APP
What I'm I doing wrong?

I have exactly this problem too with my iPhone. Exactly the same.

POS-DM, BIW & R/3 posting issue after BIW patch updation

Landscape details:
SAP IS-Retail (ECC 6.0), SAP POS (Triversity GM 9.5.10), PI 7.0, BIW/POS-DM 7.0
Issue Detail
We have upgraded the patch level of Support package BI_CONT in BIW from 5 to 11 in production server and after that following issues have started:
1.     The duplicate posting started in R/3 i.e. if some POS EoD (TLog) file is already posted from POS-DM to R/3 and if the same file comes to POS-DM again then it gets posted in R/3 again. It was not happening before updating the patch, it used to get stop in POS-DM only.
2.     We have some EANs which starts with ZERO, those POS transaction doesnu2019t get posted in BIW Cubes and R/3 wherein the ZERO prefix articles exists. It stuck in POS-DM with the error u201CUnknown EAN/UPC numberu201D. But this error comes only if we enable the u201CMstr Data Filteru201D check from General Setting in /N/POSDW/IMG. If we disable this check then the data gets posted in R/3 but it doesnu2019t go in RSA7 & BIW Cubes.
3.     Before updating the patch the u201CMstr Data Filteru201D check was disabled and our posting was happening perfectly in R/3 as well BIW. What we understand is that, this check is required to pick the Article Code from masters with reference of EAN number which comes in POS TLog file and then it gets posted. We had written a ROUTINE in update rules to pick the Article Code from masters after truncating ZERO prefix from EAN, because the masters which we upload in R/3 with ZERO prefix EAN are getting updated in BIW without ZERO prefix.
4.    In the T-Code /N/POSDW/MON0, we are not able to change the status of processed transaction from 4 (completed) to 1 (ready) or vice-a-versa. Earlier we were able to do the same. This is required to re-process the transactions after doing the corrections in errors occurred at the time of first processing.
Regards
Amar Preet Singh

Hi
1)Duplicate posting in R/3 : check the 'Tasks' configuration WPUUMS & WPUTAB in /N/POSDW/IMG in POSDM.
2) Write a Routine in BI side to allow EAN's with prefix Zeros
3) master data filter is used to check the data with BI master data. Master data filter should always be used while data posting.
4) The status should be first changed from completed to cancelled/rejected and then cancelled to Ready status.
    Then you will be able to reprocess the posdm data to ISR.
Regards
Abhijit

AP Trial Balance Report Issue

Hi gurus- I run the AP Trial Balance report and have an issue that I cannot reconcile with my raw data because when I export into excel, the invoice number is cut off after 20 characters. This client has long invoice numbers. Is there any way to get the SQL for this report and run it separately so I may see the invoice numbers and reconcile? Thanks a lot.

Hi,
Please check note:553484.1, there are some queries provided to check the TB data like queries to compare XLA and GL data.
Hope it helps

Period Wise Inventory Opening balance,Receipts ,Issues and Closing Balance

Hi Guys I need Period Wise Details,but the above query is giving date wise can any one give me a solution plz.
the Below is the table structure and the select statement that i am working on.
CREATE TABLE INV_TRACK( TRANS_ID NUMBER,
ITEM_ID VARCHAR2(10), QTY NUMBER,
COST NUMBER, TRANS_TYPE VARCHAR2(2 ),
TRANS_DATE DATE )
INSERT INTO INV_TRACK ( TRANS_ID, ITEM_ID, QTY, COST, TRANS_TYPE,
TRANS_DATE ) VALUES ( 1, 'a1', 100, 50, 'r', TO_DATE( '10/01/2005 12:00:00 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
INSERT INTO INV_TRACK ( TRANS_ID, ITEM_ID, QTY, COST, TRANS_TYPE,
TRANS_DATE ) VALUES ( 2, 'a1', 105, 50, 'r', TO_DATE( '10/01/2005 12:00:00 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
INSERT INTO INV_TRACK ( TRANS_ID, ITEM_ID, QTY, COST, TRANS_TYPE,
TRANS_DATE ) VALUES ( 3, 'a2', 100, 100, 'r', TO_DATE( '10/01/2005 12:00:00 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
INSERT INTO INV_TRACK ( TRANS_ID, ITEM_ID, QTY, COST, TRANS_TYPE,
TRANS_DATE ) VALUES ( 4, 'a1', 90, 50, 'i', TO_DATE( '10/02/2005 12:00:00 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
INSERT INTO INV_TRACK ( TRANS_ID, ITEM_ID, QTY, COST, TRANS_TYPE,
TRANS_DATE ) VALUES ( 5, 'a2', 90, 100, 'i', TO_DATE( '10/02/2005 12:00:00 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
INSERT INTO INV_TRACK ( TRANS_ID, ITEM_ID, QTY, COST, TRANS_TYPE,
TRANS_DATE ) VALUES ( 6, 'a2', 200, 100, 'r', TO_DATE( '10/02/2005 12:00:00 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
INSERT INTO INV_TRACK ( TRANS_ID, ITEM_ID, QTY, COST, TRANS_TYPE,
TRANS_DATE ) VALUES ( 7, 'a3', 2500, 10, 'r', TO_DATE( '10/03/2005 12:00:00 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
INSERT INTO INV_TRACK ( TRANS_ID, ITEM_ID, QTY, COST, TRANS_TYPE,
TRANS_DATE ) VALUES ( 8, 'a3', 100, 10, 'r', TO_DATE( '10/03/2005 12:00:00 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
INSERT INTO INV_TRACK ( TRANS_ID, ITEM_ID, QTY, COST, TRANS_TYPE,
TRANS_DATE ) VALUES ( 9, 'a3', 1500, 10, 'i', TO_DATE( '10/03/2005 12:00:00 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
SELECT *
FROM(SELECT TRANS_ID,item_id,trans_type,trans_date,
lag(qty)
over(PARTITION BY item_id ORDER BY trans_id ASC) "Opening Balance",
     DECODE(SIGN(qty-lag(qty)over(PARTITION BY item_id ORDER BY trans_id ASC)),1,(qty-lag(qty)over(PARTITION BY item_id ORDER BY trans_id ASC))) "Receipts",
     ABS(DECODE(SIGN(qty-lag(qty)over(PARTITION BY item_id ORDER BY trans_id ASC)),-1,(qty-lag(qty)over(PARTITION BY item_id ORDER BY trans_id ASC)))) "issues",
     qty "Closing Balance"
FROM inv_track)
WHERE trans_date BETWEEN :date1 AND :date2

You have the right idea for the issues/receipts, but the KEEP function will get you your opening/closing quantities.
SQL> SELECT item_id,
2         period,
3         MIN(qty) KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY trans_id) AS opening_qty,
4         SUM(CASE WHEN qty_delta>0 THEN qty_delta END) AS receipts,
5         SUM(CASE WHEN qty_delta<0 THEN qty_delta END) AS issues,
6         MAX(qty) KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY trans_id) AS closing_qty
7    FROM (
8 SELECT trans_id,
9         item_id,
10         trunc(trans_date,'mm') AS period,
11         qty,
12         qty-LAG(qty) OVER (PARTITION BY item_id ORDER BY trans_id) AS qty_delta
13    FROM inv_track
14         )
15   GROUP BY
16         item_id,
17         period
18 /
ITEM_ID    PERIOD    OPENING_QTY   RECEIPTS     ISSUES CLOSING_QTY
a1         01-OCT-05         100          5        -15          90
a2         01-OCT-05         100        110        -10         200
a3         01-OCT-05        2500       1400      -2400        1500
SQL>

Office Web Apps Load Balancing Configuration Issue for SharePoint 2013

I have load balanced servers dedicated for Office Web Apps with name “md1xxxwfe1” and “md1xxxwfe2”
, both this servers are load balanced by CISCO Load balancer. And I have mapped Load Balancer Virutal IP with host name officeapps.jda.corp.local in the DNS records.
Things are working fine if I add new farm by using New-OfficeWebAppsFarm
with server name as internalurl in PowerShell console
as like “ -internalurl http://
md1xxxwfe1 but when I use –internalurl officeapps.jda.corp.local it is not working at all. I’m not getting what to do at this point.
I have gone through following blogs but no luck.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/meamcs/archive/2013/03/27/office-web-apps-2013-multi-servers-nlb-installation-and-deployment-for-sharepoint-2013-step-by-step-guide.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/office_resource_kit/archive/2012/09/11/introducing-office-web-apps-server.aspx
http://davidlimsharepoint.blogspot.in/2013/02/installing-and-configuring-office-web.html
http://sps2013.blogspot.in/2013/09/office-web-apps-with-sharepoint-2013.html
The output of the wfe1 server is attached with this. When I open http:// /hosting/discovery in wfe1 I’m getting following result (attached
screenshot) but it should show hostname rather than server name.
Please help me
Thanks, Ram Ch

Hi Ram ,
For troubleshooting your issue, please take steps as below:
Just about any load balancing solution will work, including a server that runs the Web Server (IIS) role running Application Request Routing (ARR):Install
Application Request Routing
Install the certificate on the load balancer as described under Securing Office Web Apps Server communications by using
HTTPS.
Make sure you have configured the cluster correctly for full internet name:
Reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj219435.aspx#loadbalancer
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support,
contact [email protected]
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

New GL carry balance forward issue

We have a new SAP environment.
it was created with new GL Active, however we have not done any document splitting.
The update to GLT0 was deactivated.
We are running a year end, and i would normally use t code f.16 to carry forward the balances.
I cant run this as it says the update to GLTO is not active.
Therefore the question I have is how do you carry forward balances in the new GL?
What is the t code? is there a different t code for F.07, which is for payables and receivables?

OK
After running the new program I get the following message
Fiscal year variant BF is not maintained for calendar year 2008
Message no. FGV002
I have looked on OSS regarding FGV002, and it seems to point to some Controlling issues
Do you know about this as well, or anybosy else?

Balances Carryforward issue

Dear Experts,
We have done carryforward balances in FAGLGVTR for all GL accounts for the year 2008 to 2009. Now the issue is that two accounts balance has not been transfered. when I checked in the log I can see the two accounts balances carryforwarded. But the same is not appearing in April.
I have run the FAGLGVTR again. The same thing happened again as above.
Can anyone suggest me how I can reconcile that. Because of these two balances the Balance sheet for April is showing a huge difference.
Raj

solved

FI - PCA Balance mismatch

Dear Experts,
There is a FI PCA mismatch. transaction posted in FI but not reflecting in PCA. The following is my scenario in production.
1. User create a Bal Sheet GL X1234 in Jul-2011
2. Did not inform to assign it to 3KEH
3. Posted a few transaction for the year ending 2010, in the special period 13-2010
4. Transaction posted as per # 3, the PCA document is generated
5. Execution of T-Code 2KES, now in Aug-2011, did not have any impact. The GL X1234 could not carry forward balance of 13-2010 nor visible in the list of Bal Sheet GLs in T-Code 2KES.
6. Assigned GL X1234 in 3KEH. Execute 2KES, but still no impact on PCA.
7. I even tried to post FI Doc manually to PCA thru T-Code 1KE8. But since, the PCA doc is already generated thru FI Doc, the system displays a message that "Document already posted".
Please help me how to correct this mismatch, so that the transactions start reflecting in PCA reports and FI=PCA.
Regards,
Hussein.

Hi Ajay,
Thank you and Happy Ramazan to you too.
We already tried 1KEL, 9KE0 and 1KE8, but non could work, because the PCA Docs are already created while postings FI Docs. The concern here is, amounts are not reflecting in PCA reports S_ALR_87013336.
Line items could not be found in KE5Z.
please help further.
regards,
Hussein.

RE:Invoice & GRN mismatch issue

Hi All,
one of my user is facing an issue with regards to Invoices not being allocated to the right GRNu2019s. This causes some invoices to be paid without approval, and other invoices that have been approved to be blocked for payment.
for ex:
We have a order of a quantity of 100
We receive an invoice (qty 10) this is posted
We complete the GRN (qty 10)
This should release for payment but unfortunately just prior to the bacs run and running MRBR to unblock any invoices we post another invoice for a qty of 10.
Now the total GRN and Inv values mismatch and no invoices will be paidu2026..
The cycle goes on and on and more invoices are blocked for payment, even though some GRNu2019s are completed.
is there any way we can apply a fix to force those invoices that match a GRN be approved for payment even if the totalu2019s donu2019t match (so the matches will occur line by line and not from the totals)?
Thanks

Make sure you use goods receipt based invoice verification (set GRbasedIV flag in vendor master)

FDM Load balancer Configuration issue

We are doing the installation for Hyperion Planning, ODI and DRM on DEV environment
The EPM version we are using - 11.1.2.2
Server 1 (Windows 2008 x64)
Foundation Services
Calculation Manager
Planning Web Application
Analytical Provider Services
Essbase Administration Services web application
Oracle HTTP Server
Server 2 (Windows 2008 x64)
R & A Framework Services
R & A Framework Web Application
Financial Reporting Web Application
Web analysis Web Application
Server 3 (Windows 2008 x64)
FDM
EPMA
ODI
DRM
Essbase Integration Services
Essbase Studio
IIS 7.x
Server 4 (Windows 2008 x64)
Essbase Server
Server 5(Windows 2008 x64)
SQL Server 2008
All our services are running fine for Planning. We are in process of configuring FDM.
FDM Application Server Configuration is completed.
While doing FDM Load Balancer Configuration, we also able to connect to Shared Service directory successfully. But when we click ok to complete the configuration it gives following error -
Unable to Create Load Balancer Object!
Please verify that the user name, password, and domain are correct
Error=Cannot create ActiveX component
When checked in Event Log we found -
Unable to create Load Balance Manager object! Configuration directory could not be located. Error=-2147023878 - Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID *{E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292}*
Source=TaskManagerService - at TaskManagerService.TaskItem.fGetConfigFolder()
We tried the below steps but issue still persists -
•     Start the ‘dcomcnfg’ tool in Windows
•     Expand Component Services\Computers\My Computer\Dcom-Config and locate the following object: {E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292}
•     Right-click and choose "Properties" and click on the "Security" tab
•     Click the "Edit" button and remove all users except the default: "Everyone" and "System" and click OK, then set the radio button to "Use Default"
•     Click the "Edit" button under Access Permissions and remove all users/groups except the default items and click OK, and set the radio button to "Use Default"
•     Now click the "Identity" tab and remove the ID in the "This User" field and set the radio button to "The Launching User" and click "Apply" and "OK"
•     Now try to launch the FDM Load Balance Config and all the extra tools for FDqM
We are using hypadmin as domain account but it is part of Administrators group on FDM Server (Server 3). The administrators group is also part of -
Act as part of the operating system
Bypass traverse checking
Log on as a batch job
Log on as a service
Please let us know in case if you encountered similar error on this version and possible solution for the issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,

I woudl clear out all users/groups on the security tab of the FDM Load Balance Server DCOm object for "Launch and Activation" and "Access" permisisons and then set the identity to the "Launching User" radio button and apply. Then re-set the config.
If that still fails, try rebooting the server and then set it.
Make sure the domain and password are also correct that is being entered.

GL Balance mismatch issue in biw

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for