GL Field Status Validation @ PO Creation

Hi Gurus,
We are facing the issue summarized below:-
In FI, itu2019s set up that internal order field as mandatory for GL account 38701404. This is achieved via the field status group at GL account level.
However, with indirect procurement, itu2019s found that no checks taking place at PO creation i.e. when we create a PO and key in the GL account at PO creation, it does not indicate that internal order is a mandatory field for that GL account.
May I know how can the checking triggered during PO creation?
Sample Data used:-
Account Assignment Category: K (Cost Center)
Configuration @ OME9:
CO/PP Order - Hidden Field
Configuration @ OBC4:
CO/PP Order - Mandatory Field
Regards,
Michelle Low

Hi,
You also need to make it manadatory for the Purhcase order creation at Document type level .Please make the accountassigment mandatory ,with internal order ,This will put check during PO creation.
Thanks,
AMIT

Similar Messages

Validation: Field status of G/L account

Problem: When posting non-goods receipt invoices in MIRO, G/L account and acct assignment object are proposed by purchase order, but they can be overwritten by users with no validation, often resulting in incorrect posting.
Such validation controls are in place for ME51N and ME21N. That is, the combination of GL account and account assignment are validated/checked against Field Status Group (FSTAG u2013 based on G/L master) as well as Account Assignment Category (in PO). I want to extend those controls to MIRO non-GR invoices.
This problems fits description in OSS Note 522101. The solution recommended in the Note is u201CPossible incorrect entries could be checked or corrected by validation or substitution if necessary.u201D
If I create a validation in OB28, how should I express the logic in "Check"?
Appreicate any help on this.

Hi,
I do not think so that there are standard BADI or User Exit available in std sap for such validations.
It is a facility given by sap to post to a separate GL account in MIRO screen.
If you want a GL to be taken only with perticular cost center or other account assignment , try a user exit or try changing the std program for MIRO.
Regards,

Field status as mandatory while creation of RE-FX Lease Out Contract

Hi SAP Real Estate Friends,
I have a requirement wherein we need to make the field status of some specific fields as mandatory for data input in RE-FX Lease Out Contract. The fields are mentioned below:
1. Profit Centre in Organizational Assignment Term.
2. Payment Terms in Postings Term.
3. Account Determination Value in Postings Term.
4. Resubmission Rule needs to be mandatorily selected by the user creating the RE-FX lease Out Contract.
5. Fixtures and Fittings Characteristics needs to be mandatorily selected by the user creating the RE-FX Rental Object.
Also we need to achieve a requirement that in case a posting has already been carried out for a given RE-FX Contract for a given Account Determination Value, same shall not be available for change in the RE-FX Contract subsequently.
Plz write back with your valuable inputs.
Thanx in advance
Pankaj

Hello,
You can set the field status from this path:
RECACUST > Contract > Dialog > Screen Layout > Field Groups > Field Status per Contract Type
Regards,
Suvarghya.

Make a field required on record creation, read only after that

Hello,
Does anyone know of a way to make a pick-list field required on record creation, but read-only after that? The other twist to this is that we need to allow this field to also be read-write for all the integration edits, since this field's value could change in the enterprise database.
Thanks,
Neal G.

Hi !
I think you can add a validation rule for that. Something like :
IIf(PRE('<YOURFIELD>') IS NULL, <> '', = PRE('<YOURFIELD>'))
This means that if the previous value of your field is null (it's a creation), so the value must be different than blank. Else, it must be equal to the previous value, so not modified.
I didn't tested it, but I let you get back to me if it works... or not !
You'll just have to add a message saying that this field is required on creation and readonly after...
Hope this will help, feel free to ask more !
Max

MIRO: Field Status control per GL master for non-goods receipt invoices

When posting incoming invoices in FI using FB60, the combination of GL account and CO account assignment are validated and checked against Field Status Group (FSTAG). Such controls are also in place in MM for purchase requisition (ME51N) and purchase order (ME21N), in addition to checking the account assignment category.
But there is problem in posting non-goods receipt (2-way match) invoices in MIRO u2013 system checks GL account and account assignment object according to account assignment category in PO, but not the field status based on GL account. GL account and acct assignment object are proposed by purchase order. However they can be overwritten by users with no validation, often resulting in incorrect posting. Wonder how other manage this issues in their companies.
I would like and need help in implementing a validation or user exit in MIRO which will check GL account against its CO account assignment for cost centre, order or WBS, based on the field status group of the GL master.
Q1, Where is the user-exit or validation maintained that checks the field status group in FB60 and ME21N (not in OB28 or GGB0)?
Q2. If purchase requisition and purchase order check field status group based on GL account, how can we make such controls available in MIRO?
Q3. What is the transaction code for developing a validation for MIRO? (MM MIRO not appeared in the application area of GGB0.)
Appreciated any help

Hi
Th evalidation should be at the source is the Purchase Order. I beleive it is standard SAP Config to put the validation there. So once the PO has been created with the correct account assignments the GR and IR will be correct.

Company code ZG01 is not assigned to a fiELD status variant

HI,
I have created company called 'zg01'.
when i try to create a GL ACCOUNT FOR this company using (FS00) i am getting the following error.
Company code ZG01 is not assigned to a fiELD status variant.
FOR YOUR INFORMATION I HAVE CREATED COA and assign the same to the company ZG01.
Please suggest....
also suggest how to i transport GL Accounts used by other companys of my system to my newly created company code : zg01.
so that i can save creation of GL ACCOUNT.

You have to maintain field status variant and assign it to your company code. This is required for GL master data.
1. Define Field status variant in SPRO>Financial Acctg>Financial Acctg Global Settings>Document>Line Item>Controls>Define Field status variant. You create the field status variant and the field status group.
2. Assign the Field Status group to your company code SPRO>Financial Acctg>Financial Acctg Global Settings>Document>Line Item>Controls>Assign Company Code to Field Status Variants
Once you have defined this you will be able to assign field status group to your GL master data.
The use of Field Status Group is to determine the required/displayed/optional fields during posting transactions.

Field Status Group influence when Purchase Requisition being created

Hi!
I have a requirement from a client regarding the influence of the Field Status Group on Purchasing Documents.
A Filed Status Group has been created in which has the CO/PP order set as Required entry for the Account Assignment.
This Group was then assigned to a GL Account.
When a Goods Receipt (MIGO) against a Purchase Order is entered for a GL which requires an Internal Order, the standard error message "Field Order is a required field for G/L account 0010 4105000100 " (message # F5808) appears if the Account Assignment on the PO is incorrect & no Internal Order has been entered.
This is fine & is how the system operates as standard.
However, the requirement from my client is to make this error message appear when a Purchase Requisition is being entered on the system, before it is converted to a PO & then receipted.
They believe that calling the message at the point of GR is too late in the process.
Could anyone advise on any possible BAPI, etc which could help us with this requirement??
Thanks,
k

I have gone to the Tcode which has been given,
In the first field , I have given the company code,
in the second field , I have given call Plant (0002)
Validation ......how do i give the validation please let me know
With Regards,

Carrier Details on Field status group for vendor master

Hi,
I have a requirement to make the SCAC and Carrier freight group as required fields on vendor master .
but the standard SAP system requires/ allows three fields : SCAC , carrier freight group and Service agent procedure group as mandatory to be activated under the 'carrier details ' column in the field status group (transaction OB23 and OBD3).
I want to know if there is a way to flag just the SCAC and carrier freight group as required fields for entry in vendor master .
Thanks
Naga Yarramsetty

Hi All,
Thanks for your reply. With user exit and validation, I cannot create mandatory mark in FS00. Actually SAP make this description always mandatory. But there is no mandatory mark in this column. I just want to create mandatory mark in this column. Need you advice.
Thanks,
John

Check G/L field status group for Business area

Hi, when I set the buiness area, I set field status group to required for BA field, the setting always check the BA field on accouting doc. But some G/L is automatic posted, always show "Business area is a required field for G/L account ...",
Can you help me to slove, thanks

Check the following issues
1)Check the status of the other GL accounts field status for business areas.
2)Check if there is any validation for GL accounts which can be given without business area.
Hope this helps.
Regards

Automatic place invoice payment On Hold when invoice status 'Validated' ...

Hi..I need a quick help on the following -
Here is the scenario...I have an Invoice with status ‘Validated’ and Approval field on the Invoice Header (Descriptive Flex Field) with status ‘Not Approved’
based on the above condition, I am trying to place invoice payment 'On Hold' on schedule payments tab on invoice workbench ... I want to achieve this by a custom program..let me know if we have any standard API to do this(or do we need to directly update ap_payment_schedules_all.hold_flag to 'Y' when above condition is met)...please let me know your thoughts..Thanks!!
Edited by: user600637 on Feb 21, 2012 2:06 PM

If it was marked as an invoice then its probably a scam doing the rounds as its been sent by a buyer and altered to look as though he has paid you.
Signs its a scam are >>>
its an invoice BUT sellers send invoices not buyers
marked as paid
marked as gift
says payment won't show in your balance for eg 24 hours
can't be chargedback.
Paypal NEVER tell you to send anything until the funds are showing in your paypal account balance.
Paypal payments are more or less instant.
Paypal will never tell you that a payment can't be subject to a chargeback. ****************************************** I give up my time to help you so a thank you or kudos would be cool.
Marking one of my replies as a solution would be appreciated if I sorted your problem.

Field Status Group For MIRO

Dear Friends
Pls say me where we can get the field status group for Miro header level where i got a problem to make the business area manditory.
Regards
Vinay Bhaskar

Hi vinay
for busienss place we can make the field mandatory thorugh validations it is not possible through FSG
Plz reward the point if it is useflull
Regards

Field Status by Transaction code or User Exit

Hi all,
Is it possiblee to change field status group according to transaction code and GL account? Any configuration or user exit?
For example, transaction FB01 account 100000 using Field status group A and transaction FB60 account 100000 using field status group B.
Or is there any user exit to change the screen of FI transaction?
Thanks,
Phon

Maybe you could try with FI Validations...Tx. <b>OB28</b>
Greetings,
Blag.

Trading Partner and Field status Groups

Hello,
I've red in previous posts how it's possibile to be mandatory the trading partner field (VBUND) for G/L acounts.
At the end; it seems that it could be done with a validation.
But someone could explain me why it cannot possible to manage this with Field status Groups?
Thanks in advance
Alberto

Hi,
There are 2 options availabel to populate trading partner 1 is by populating in the GL account master in the initial screen by which you would need to have multiple inter-company accounts. Or you can go to the document type configuration OBA7 and select "enter trading partner " in control data this would populate trading partner in case the inter-company posting is between 2 co codes.
You would also populate trading patner in the customer and vendor master which are inter-company.
In scenarios where you have posting in more than one inter-company the system doesnt derive the trading partner there you need to populate the trading partner manually and hence you require a validation to make trading partner for a group of GL accounts.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks and regards
K.R

F-65 field statuses

Hi all,
Please can you assist me with transaction F-65,how do i set the field status of the cost center and the segment if i am posting to an expense account.
The cost center field has been set as required for the expense account but when doing a parked document through F-65 it shows as optional,how do i change this?
Thanks in advance.
Ledile

Ledile,
When you park a document in SAP, it does not check all of the things that are checked when you post a document. That is because parking is used to save a document that is in progress - for example, because you do not have all the information needed to post the document, but do not want to lose your changes. If parking required you to enter a cost center, then in your situation, if a user had started a document with many line items and then found that they did not have the cost center for one of the line items, the user would not be able to save the document in progress - and would lose all the work of entering the other line items. When the parked document is actually posted, SAP will perform all required checks - including field status checks, validations, substitutions, etc.
Regards,
Shannon

Transactional dependent field status variant and field status varinat

hi gurus,
can any one please tell me what is transactional dependent field status variant and field status varinat and what is the difference between the both,what this both control?
appreciated if answered.
Regards,
sandeep.ch

Hi
Any field status varinat is a bundle of filed status grouop(FSG). A FSG will control the Screen layout of the Document while you post.Whether a filed is required, optional or suppressed etc.
Transactional dependent data:
Transaction Dependent Control - Field status can also be configured at the master data transaction level i.e. during Create, Change, and Display. Thus, if a user wishes that after creation of master data certain fields should not be changed, same can be set as 'Display'. One such example can be fields like reconciliation account, payment terms etc.So these terms remain constant while posting and user cant change these fields.
Regards
Aravind
Assign points if useful.

GL Field Status Validation @ PO Creation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for