Global Access

I'm trying to create a web-based app that can interact with Exchange server globally. Meaning, I need it to have the ability to view, change, delete, and create all e-mails, calendars, appointments, tasks, notes, etc... across the domain. I am using .Net,
and have been looking into sinks, but wasn't sure if this was the best route to go. Will sinks give me the full functionality I need (It appears to only work with e-mails, though I haven't fully begin coding it yet as I'm waiting on the server to arrive)?
Or does anyone have any better suggestions / ideas? Thanks in advance!
Andrew Whittington
Let me elaborate a little further, I think I gave the wrong impression. These solutions allow for a client to access their e-mail, calendar, etc... via the webmail.
I need the web-app to be able to access everyone's e-mails, calenders, etc... Not for each individual client to access their own. The final solution will provide a way to track a team within a company.

Exchange does already have a webmail interface it is known as Outlook Web Access.
Another option is to use simple SMTP located in the System.Web.Mail namespace within the .net framework.
System.Web.Mail Namespace
If you are after a specific API then hopefully you are using Exchange 2007, if you are look at the
Exchange Development on Microsofts MSDN Site
Also check out this book, it may have some very useful info in it
Exchange Web Services

Similar Messages

How can I find out "Global Access Protocol Pass phrase" for OAM server ?

I'm configuraing Access gate using configureAccessGate command to integrate OIF with OAM.
The OAM is working in "simple" transport mode. since it was not me installed OAM, I do not know what "Global Access Protocol Pass phrase" is.
I need this to answer question to configure access gate. How can I find out the "Global Access Protocol Pass phrase" set for OAM server?
Thanks

Hi ITBobbyP,
SSIS has a built in FTP task, while this only works for the FTP protocol, it doesn’t support SFTP. But there are some free clients like WinSCP and
SSIS SFTP Task Control Flow Component
available in the CodePlex which can invoked from SSIS.
References:
SSIS SFTP Task Control Flow Component approach
WinSCP approach
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Will adding global access change my domestic plan?

Will adding global access to my phone now change my domestic calling plan and if so should I wait until I'm out of the country to change it?

twodogsfourfish
I completely understand how important it is to be clear about any changes to your plan and coverage before completing changes! I can definitely go over the details with you. With being on the Nationwide plan currently, what global access were you looking to add to your plan? If the $25/100MB data plan for global data access, this will only add the $25 charge itself. If the $4.99 Voice Value plan to lower per minute rates outside the country, again it will only add the $4.99 charge itself and will not change your domestic plan. Were you looking to move to a More Everything Canada/Mexico plan instead? This would change your calling plan depending on when it was made effective.
As with any international trip, I definitely recommend reviewing our trip planner to make sure you're clear on all rates and dialing instructions before you go! The $25 and $4.99 features are not compatible in all countries. http://vz.to/1fb1kE8
RuthW_VZW
Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

Airport disk global access

does any one know how to setup airport disk for global access, and how can it be accessed using finder globally, meaning outside of LAN.

bigraytk, Welcome to the discussion area!
Copied from Pages 58-9 of "Designing AirPort Networks Using AirPort Utility" (direct PDF download).
Plug the hard disk into the USB port on the back of the base station.
Open AirPort Utility, located in the Utilities folder in the Applications folder on a Mac, or in Start > All Programs > AirPort on a Windows computer.
Select your base station, and then choose Manual Setup from the Base Station menu, or double-click the base station to open its configuration in a separate window. Enter the base station password if necessary.
Click the Disks button, and then click File Sharing.
Choose “With a disk password,” or “With base station password” if you want to secure the shared disk with a password, or choose “With accounts” if you want to secure the disk using accounts.
If you choose to use accounts, click Configure Accounts, click the Add button, and then enter a name and password for each user that will access the disk.
Choose “Not allowed,” “Read only,” or “Read and write” to assign guest access to the disk.
*Select the “Share disks over Ethernet WAN port” checkbox if you want to provide remote access to the disk over the WAN port.*

DBMS_Session.List_Context() for GLOBALLY ACCESSED Context

I created
CREATE CONTEXT myContext USING PACKAGE myPackage ACCESSED GLOBALLY ;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE myPackage
PROCEDURE Set_My_Context(
piId IN INTEGER,
piValue IN INTEGER) ;
END myPackage ;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY myPackage
PROCEDURE Set_My_Context(
piId IN INTEGER,
piValue IN INTEGER)
IS
BEGIN
DBMS_Session.Set_Context(
'myContext',
'myValue',
piValue,
SYS_Context('USERENV', 'SESSION_USER'),
piId) ;
END Set_My_Context ;
END My_Package ;
Test Script
DECLARE
iSize INTEGER ;
tblAppCtx DBMS_Session.AppCtxTabTyp ;
BEGIN
DBMS_Session.Set_Identifier(piId) ;
My_Package.Set_My_Context(
1,
9999) ;
DBMS_Session.List_Context(
tblAppCtx
iSize) ;
DBMS_Output.Put_Line('iSize = ' || iSize) ;
DBMS_Output.Put_Line('SYS_Context(''myContext', ''myValue'') = '
|| SYS_Context('myContext', 'myValue') ) ;
END ;
Output
iSize = 0
SYS_Context('myContext', 'myValue') = 9999
Questions
1) Why isn't the global application variable included in List_Context()? It obviously exists based on the value returned by SYS_Context().
2) Is it because the context is accessed globally and the variable is stored in the SGA not the UGA?
(My theory because List_Context() works as accepted if CREATE CONTEXT myContext USING PACKAGE myPackage does not include ACCESSED GLOBALLY. However I can find do such an exclusion within Oracles documentation for DBMS_Session or CREATE CONTEXT.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Jenean Spencer

1) Why isn't the global application variable included in List_Context()?because list_context just includes contexts which are session specific. Global Contexts are not session specific ...
If you want to get hold of the global contexts then use the view global_context:
SQL> select * from v$version where rownum = 1
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
1 row selected.
SQL> create context mycontext using mypackage accessed globally
Context created.
SQL> create or replace package mypackage
as
procedure set_my_context (piid in integer, pivalue in integer);
end mypackage;
Package created.
SQL> create or replace package body mypackage
as
procedure set_my_context (piid in integer, pivalue in integer)
is
begin
    dbms_session.set_context ('myContext', 'myValue', pivalue, sys_context ('USERENV', 'SESSION_USER'), piid);
end set_my_context;
end mypackage;
Package body created.
SQL> declare
isize       integer;
tblappctx   dbms_session.appctxtabtyp;
begin
dbms_session.set_identifier (1);
mypackage.set_my_context (1, 9999);
for c in (select * from global_context)
loop
    dbms_output.put_line (c.namespace || ': ' || c.attribute || ' - ' || c.value);
end loop;
end;
MYCONTEXT: MYVALUE - 9999
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SSRS reports global access

I have created one project in MSBI - SSRS. Under that I have 6-7 charts. I have deployed them successfully on my localhost machine using ReportServer and it is working absolutely through browser.
My challenge is I want to access these reports from some other corner of the world; so that machine may not present in the same domain / LAN / etc. How should do this? Client don't want to install tool, etc.. they just want to see the reports by hitting URL
which should open in browser and should be able to see the reports.
Please help me out.

Hi Inssaurabh,
According to your description, there are several reports on your Report Server, now what you want is that deploy this report to internet, so peoples who not present in the same domain can access to them, right?
In this case, we can create a custom application, display the reports on it using ReportView control, and then deploy this custom application to internet.
References.
Planning for Extranet or Internet Deployment
Internet Facing Reporting Services Instance
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Global Access to Listener Function

Hello All --
I am using a third-party Flash add-on tool that will let me
get a device's battery level (among other things) via listeners.
The following code is in my first actionscript frame:
import ssp.device.*;
var statusListener:Object = new Object();
// set-up status listener to get battery level
statusListener.getBatteryLevel = function(e)
_global.batteryLevel = e;
Status.addEventListener(statusListener);
Status.getBatteryLevel();
The final line in the preceding script successfully sets
_global.batteryLevel. The problem is that the script is run only
once, when the application starts. What I need to be able to do is
to call Status.getBatteryLevel() from a battery monitoring
movieclip within my main movie. The movieclip runs constantly to
update a display of remaining battery charge.
Unfortunately, whenever I try to execute
Status.getBatteryLevel() from any frame other than the one where
the listener is set-up, the function does not work. Is there
something that I need to do to make the function call available
globally?
Regards,
-- Phil

It seems unusual that the Status object only dispatches
events when you request them... but perhaps its just a model I'm
not used to. Anyhow...
Where is your monitoring clip relative to the timeline that
holds Status?
If its also in the same timeline then you should be able to
get to Status from its timeline by using
_parent.Status.getBatteryLevel();
I never really use the _global object, but I guess you could
do that too.
Status.addEventListener(statusListener);
Status.getBatteryLevel();
_global.getBatteryLevel = Status.getBatteryLevel;
then just use
_global.getBatteryLevel();
I think that would work.

Q. Globally accessing information

Besides using STATIC to be able to access variables and functions throughout an application that have multiple classes and threads, is there another method that could be used to handle this.
Maybe something involving threads?
Any help would be appreciated.

I don't think threads are where you want to go. If what you want is to have all the parts of your program have access to the same instance of a single class then you could write the class as a "singleton" design pattern.
Is that what you need?
public SingletonClass {
   private static SingletonClass theOnlyOne = null;
   // this is private so you can't create one of these
   private SingletonClass (){
      // initialization goes here
   // use this method to get the one and only instance of this class
   public static SingletonClass getInstance() {
      if (theOnlyOne == null) {
         theOnlyOne = new SingletonClass ();
       return theOnlyOne;
}The code above will one create one instance of "SingletonClass" the first time you call SingletonClass.getInstance(). From then on every other call to SingletonClass.getInstance() will give you the same instance.

Global access configuration file

is ther any limitation while devolping cgi in 8.2
Message Edited by mazhar.ali on 08-27-2008 09:43 AM

Hi Marzar,
If you are the same person who posted this quesion on LAVA, then you are being consistent in not making your request clear.
If you are not comforatble with English, then please post your question in your native language and someone will either translate or will reply in your prefered language.
Trying to help (but not sure how),
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Access 2013: Sum fields on a form suddenly showing up blank

I have a simple Access database (originally built in 2010, now running 2013). Sometime in the last week or so all of the SUM fields in the database started showing up BLANK (one minute everything was working fine, the next it wasn't, not sure what happened
in between). Even when I create a new, basic form, I can't seem to get my SUM fields working.
For example, I have a table where I document number of miles traveled for work purposes, the fields include: TravelDate, ProjectID, Mileage, and Description. Mileage is a Number field, Long Integer. If I create a continuous form, connect it to the table
(same thing happens if I connect to a query), add a field in the Detail section with
Mileage as control source and txtMileage as name and a field in the FORM FOOTER that is: =Sum([txtMileage])...the SUM field is empty in
Form View. And, there are no NULL values in the data set. This is happening across all of my forms and subforms, all SUM fields are now displaying as blank.
Is it possible that I changed a global Access setting to cause this? A form setting? Any other ideas?
Thanks!
Laura

I had the same sudden issue. But I was able to determine that it involved only one workstation. All the others were fine, as well as a test run on another Win 8 station outside the environment. From there I was able to determine that a third party
app had been installed near the time of the problem showing up. I uninstalled it and it immediately was resolved. The app was a C# based tool thought the authors have yet to identify why this caused a problem. My suspicion is that they wrote a 32 bit version
and this was installed on a 64 bit station, and there is some issue with mso.dll, where I believe the function calls exist for sum. I am testing to see if there are similar function errors in Excel.
What is noticeable was that Access did not throw a an Error# nor a #name. Just nothing appeared, and when you click on a row, the sum would appear, though it was incorrect.
In Access 2010 I remember there were some footer field issues in continuous which eventually were patched.
It was an opportunity to remind my client - do not install anything from any one on the live system without prior testing.

Ssrs security access for users on a different domain

Hi
We are using ssrs 2008 r2 and have added a new domain to our network as we are working with another company.
Our original domain was say "DomainA" which can access all our reports, how do we give access to the new domain "DomainB" access to our reports?
We are unable to add DomainB users to our AD security groups so I have created a windows groups called SSRS_DomainB_Users and given them access to our parent folder and also added them into site settings as a system user.
What is the best way to deal with this?
Users in DomainB will eventually be added to DomainA and DomainB will then be deleted.
One of the users I am testing with gets an error message :
User 'Domain name/user' does not have the required permissions. Verify that sufficient permissions have been granted and Windows User Account Control (UAC) restrictions have been addressed.
Thanks

Hi Nasa1999,
According to your description, you want your reports can be accessed by user from different domain. Right?
In this scenario, we should do Internet Deployment for your reports so that users from different domain can access the reports. Please the articles below:
Planning for Extranet or Internet Deployment
Using Reporting Services in an Internet/Extranet Environment
SQL Server 2008 Reporting Services
for Internet deployment
Reference:
SSRS reports
global access
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

8.0.6-119 on S160 can no longer see past the second access policy

We upgraded an S160 to 8.0.6-119 today and now the appliance is not authenticating groups beyond restricted internet and information technology. For example Access Policy #6 is called Marketing. It has access to Streaming Media and Social Media (like youtube, facebook, twitter). They are the marketing department that needs this access to do their job. The identity policy is authenticated_users but it keeps falling under the last access policy "Global Access Policy" which results in request blocked based on URL category.
I just don't get it. Authenticated Users is selected to windows realm which the wsa joined to the domain and has 3 DC's and a CDA virtual appliance tied to it. I don't see that being the issue because the policy trace correctly brings back all AD groups the user is tied to. The scheme is Use Kerberos or NTLMSSP.
Next under access policies there are 14 of them before the global policy. They are all authenticated users and pointed to the proper active directory groups. Marketing is 6 out of 14 (not counting the non-numbered Global Policy at the bottom).
So what could the issue be?

I opened a case with TAC but have not heard back. However it seems things are working now. Perhaps they contacted in and corrected an issue but haven't had the chance to tell me what they did. I have remote access enabled for Cisco TAC.
Now when I do the policy trace, It actually applies the Marketing access policy, and AVC actually see's this is Facebook General (Facebook) in this case. Before I think it said none for everything and access policy was global.

In Cisco IronPort WSA, what is the difference of an Access Policy, and an Identity?

Hi Everyone,
I am currently setting up a custom access for a particular subnet.
What I did is to create a new identity for them, then allowed only specific URL categories for them. Note that the subnet is already allowed to access the internet through Global access policy.
What will be the difference if I rather created a new Access Policy for the subnet?
And technically, what's the difference of an Access Policy and an Identity?

This was not my question. I asked if using the Marginal in Printing will you have a frame around the image?
I think you're confused about which thread you are posting to. "Wully bully" started this thread by asking about identify plates and watermarks, and I replied to Wully bully's post.
Nevertheless, your question too about printing is best asked in the main LR forum, not here.

What is the maximum number of globals allowed in one global file?

I remember there was a limit discussed in a LabVIEW class, but I can't remember it. But I know I exceeded the number on one project and VERY WEIRD things happened. Does anybody know this number?
Thanks Much

HI Tbob,
You are going to earn the title of Global Enthusiast if you keep this up
Race conditions are to Globals as Venerial deseas is to sex. If you want to avoid the former then abstain from the latter.
Yes you can use globals.
In fact, I ran a benchmark comparing how fast I can read a global booean vs the same coded as a LV2 global. The Global booean was 6 (or was it 16?) times as fast.
When answering Q's that use phrases like "strange things" we bring up the race condition and point users to LV2's.
Sure text based programmers learn how to handle global access in multi-threaded environments. These types of interaction are implemented by making the global a protected section that are protected using semaphores. This same approach can be used to protect LV globals. Just ensure all reads and writes of teh globals are only done after acquiring the semaphore that protects the global. If you did thisfor all accesses to the global you would not have race conditons with globals.
Unfortunately this is a lot of work because now you have to deal with creating acquiring releasing the semaphores and this has to be done for each value you need to protect from simultaneous access.
Now if there was an easier way well then....
BUT THERE IS!
It turns out that when a VI is not reentrant (like in a LV2) LV implements a scheme that prevents simultaneous execution of the VI. So by using a LV2 you pick-up the resource locking with ZERO EFFORT!
So being lazy, I use the method that is imune from race conditons from the very begining. That way when my customer asks "Can I manipulate the cal values from any of the machines on the network?" I can say "YES, that was functionality is supported by the design".
I could not say that if I implemented the cal via globals.
So that is why I push LV2's and and discorage globals.
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Ear access standalone Resource Adapter problem

I deployed a standalone resource adapter. Then I deployed a ear.
In the ear, I try to look up the resource adapter, I got an exception:
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: No Object found: MyRA|null
In weblogic-ra.xml, I added:
<enable-global-access-to-classes>true</enable-global-access-to-classes>
but still have the problem.
However, when I embeded the RA in the ear and deploy the ear, I can get the RA by lookup()
Is there anyway I can get successfully look up the standalone RA?
P.S.
My problem seems to be similar with an earlier post "Access Resource Adaptar outside the EAR".
Access Resource Adaptar outside the EAR
My problem is different.
I lookup the RA in an ear deployed in the server.
However, I'm not using EJB to lookup the RA.
server version: weblogic server 11g r1
Thanks a lot

My RA runs correctly after deployment, I can see my RA in the JNDI tree.
I just did some more tests.
I use the following way to look up:
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
ConnectionFactory cf = (ConnectionFactory) ctx.lookup("MyConnectionFactory");
If I look up it in an EJB, I can get the object.
But when I look up in a servlet, no object can be found.
The servlet is in a war embeded in the ear.

Global Access

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for