GR Based IR checked in PO if SC amt exceed clip level amount

Dear SRM Experts,
We are implementing SRM 7.0 extended classic scenario. We have a business requirement to do goods receipt if the shopping cart amount exceed USD 5000. To meet this requirement we have created a custom table. This custom table has the parameters as company code; Currency and clip level amount. We have implemented this functionality by putting a custom code in the BADI (In PO change BADI)
If the shopping cart amount exceeds the clip level amount maintained for a company code in custom table then system will flag goods receipt indicator in PO.(Same PO will be replicated to ECC).
We have tested this functionality. It is working fine for one company code however for other company codes if the shopping cart amount exceed clip level amount system will check GR indicator as well as GR based invoiced receipt in PO (as well as in ECC PO).
Please note we have not at hard coded any company code in the custom code.
We debugged the code and found that there are no issues with custom code. We suspect that there might be an issue with standard code.
I would request if any one of you guys faced this issue and know something abt this issue. Please suggest silutions to fix this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Umakanth

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

Similar Messages

Need to change the LOV field based on checked box selection in OAF page

Dear ALL,
I have a requirement as below:
I have a custom OAF page having a lov field which is mandatory, a check box and a two text fields.
So based on LOV value selection i am defaulting two text field value automatically.
So my requirement is when user selects the check box automatically the LOV field should be non mandatory and user can insert in values to the lov field and text field and submit it.
SO basically based on check box field selection i need to make the lov field in such a way it should accept all the values what user enters instead of check the query added in VO behind the LOV.
Please suggest me some pointers to achieve this requirement.
Thanks
Deb

hi,
in PFR use:
if ("checkevent".equals(pageContext.getParameter(EVENT_PARAM)))
                 HashMap hashMap = new HashMap();
                 String checkboxval=pageContext.getParameter("item2");
              hashMap.put("checkboxval",checkboxval);
                pageContext.setForwardURLToCurrentPage(hashMap ,
                true, // retain the AM
                OAWebBeanConstants.ADD_BREAD_CRUMB_NO,
                OAWebBeanConstants.IGNORE_MESSAGES);
and in PR use:
if((pageContext.getParameter("checkboxval'))!=null)
OAMessageLovInputBean lovInputBean=(OAMessageLovInputBean)webBean.findIndexedChildRecursive("item3");
      lovInputBean.setRequired("false");
try it
Regards
Mahesh

Default the GR based IV check in PO based on account assignment category

Hi Experts,
We have the below business requirement based on GR based IV check in the PO. We knows that this can be automatically defaulted by using the two master records.
1.Vendor master,
2.Purchase info record.
But our cilents needs this field to be automated based on the account assignment category. Because lot of vendors are created without the activiation of this check box also they do not want to go by mass upload transaction to change the master records.
They want only based on the account assignement category. For example if a PO is created using the account assignement K then this GR based IV is selected automatically.
Kindly adivce any configuration setting is available to fullfill this requiremennt.

Hi,
unfortunately the GR based IV can not be set in OME9 (in customizing).
In ME21N, if it is normal PO, GR Based IV indicator is not set. But if
item category = D, GR Based IV indicator is automatically set by
system.
Best regards
Erika

If GR based IV checked for items without excise duty, MIRO posting hanging.

Iam working in a client location, one of client business scenario is MIRO posting without excise (Only VAT or CST). for this case i have not maintained vendor excise details in J1ID.
When a MIRO with reference to PO for an item ticked for "GR based IV" is posted, the system is hanging or is not posting and not issuing any message. Specifically for an item to which exicse is not applicable.
please send your expert advice on this
Edited by: J Sridharan on Mar 30, 2009 3:55 PM

Thanks for your response
this issue is further briefed below
we are working for a indian client with CIN. most of the PO's which is created in SAP system with all Excise parameters and applicable taxes. further all PO's created with GR based IV check box enabled.
now the issue is, in some of the purchases vendor is not applicable for excise, so there is no excise parameters in the PO, only tax is applicable. for this case we have not maintained vendor excise details in J1ID. but we have maintained material chapter id and CENVAT determination in J1ID. but as i mentioed earlier these PO's also with GR based IV check box enabled.
If the PO is not excisable no Excise capturing and posting is required, for these types of PO's we are following the below steps
1. Creation of PO with GR based IV check box enabled
2. Goods Receipt without excise capturing
3. Invoice verification - MIRO ( here system is not able to post the docuement because of GR based IV tick mark)
i hope this will brief about my query.
waiting for your response.

GR based IV check box suppressed - Extended Classic Scenario

Hello Folks,
How are you doing today ?
We are working in SRM 5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
When created the Local PO in SRM with GR Based IV Check box active, the
follow-on back-end Purchase order is generated without this flag. In
other terms, system is creating the follow-on ECC PO without GR Based
IV check box active. As a result, we are unable to run the ERS cycle.
Back-end system in above scenario is ECC 6.0. And vendor settings are
maintained with GR based IV flag on in both ECC and SRM.
Kindly advice.
Thank you for your assistance !

Hi Ravi and Yann,
Thank you for your inputs. OSS note-956083 can not be applied in my case due to the hight system version (patch level 550).
I have already raised this issue to SAP, but in the lack of proper infrastrucure SAP can not access the system. (BASIS guys are still struggling with it)
Well...let me give you recap-
We have not activated nor implemented any BAdi so far (Vanila SRM 5.0 EC scenario) PO creation for goods is working fine and as desired. But when it come across with PO with limit item or services, system throws an error as -
"PO 5100000263: Service-based invoice verif. requires GR "NO" or G R-based invoice verif."
Would deeply appreciate if you guys can share insight on this issue.
Thank you for your assistance!

Rule based ATP check with SOA

Hello,
We wish to implement ATP check using Ent Services.
Details:
Environment : SAP ECC 6.o with Enhancement Package 3/ SCM 5.0
Ent service used: /SAPAPO/SDM_PARCRTRC : ProductAvailabilityRequirementCreateRequestConfirmation
We were able to carry out Product check using the service. However we are unable to carry out rule based ATP check using the same service.
We have carried out the entire configuration as per SAP's building block configuration guide for Global ATP & SAP Note 1127895.
For RBA <Rule based ATP check>, we are getting the results as expected when we create Sales order from SAP R/3 (Transaction VA01), however ATP simulation in APO & Ent service does not give the results as expected. When we carry out ATP simulation in APO / Ent service, results are same as Product check & not as RBA i.e. they respect only requested Product location stock & does not propose alternate Product or Location in case of shortages
Plz share the experience to fix the issue
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

Hi mangesh
Check this links , not very sure , but may help you...
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/erplo/availability%252bchecking%252bin%252bsap
Re: ATP confirmation in CRM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/scm/rba
Regards
Abhishek

GR Based IV check box

Hi. I need help in controlling the GR Based IV check box in creating the PO.
We normally set this in the vendor master. But then, How can I set the GR BASED IV checkbox base on the PO document type that will be used?
Let say I want all sap standard types of PO to be GR Based and some Z type PO to be not a GR based IV PO. Is this possible?
Is there a User-Exit for this?

HI,
Since you want to set the GR based IV to set for all Standard Purchase order- at doc type level.
So the first thing is the vendor master setting which you are already doing.
Second you can also do it by the info record .by creating info record for all vendor and material /Material Group ..we can control the GR IV indicator
Third thing is Controlling it by the screen layout.
SPRO-Material Mangement-Purchasing- Purchase order-Define doc types
here in the definition of Doc type ,attach a screen layout.
SPRO-Material Mangement-Purchasing- Purchase order- Define screen Layout at doc type level.
in this Screen layout in the tab --GRIR control. make the GR based invoice as mandatory,so that it cant be skipped while created or change of PO and user will check it even if it is missed out.
hope so it helps
Regards
Anjanna

Default settings for gr based ir check box for asset PO

dear experts,
in vendor master record in purchasing data tab i have checked gr based iv check box, and hence whenever i am creating a Po with X vendor for material system is automatically checking the check box in po for gr based iv but with the same vendor X if i am creating a PO for Asset itis not checking the gr based iv check box by default.
can you pls tell me where the default setting for gr based iv lies for the asset procurement.
thanks
ujwal

HI Ujjwala,
The setting in spro in Acct assigment, u are talking about is GR Receipt or Invoice Receipts.
These are not GR Based Invoice Verification.
GR based Invoice Verification comes from either ur inforecords or vender master.
if u check or uncheck these in spro in acct assigment, then it will comes ur Deliver Tab not ur invoice Verification Tab.
one thing more, if u make it mutiple Acct assigment, then it will be Non Valuated G/R Based IV.
Hope Clear U !
REgards,
Pardeep Malik

Rule based availability check

Hi,
Please provide step by step guide instructions for rule based availability check configuration. Your help is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Chandana

Hi Chandana,
I have provided the below link which contains the full details of step by
step configuration of rule based availability check
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/fb/e6783739e6ff5de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Please confirm your query is resolved
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Rule based ATP Check - User Exit to modify the item

Hi all,
We are working with standard rule based ATP check to change the plant in the Sales Order item.
That creates a new subitem with the new plant determination, and changes the Item Category of the original item.
My doubt is: Is there any User Exit in this process to do the system change something else in the Sales Order items?
<< Moderator message - Please do not offer points >>
Thanks!!
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 8, 2010 2:20 PM

Hi Roger,
Please clarify more what do want to change exactly example any Z field to be copied from main item to sub item.
You can use exit USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP , USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK
Thanks,
Pavan Verma

Rule based GATP Check

Hello experts,
Our team has configured rule based gatp check parameters and maintained condition technique, relevant rules with product substitution, location substitution, profile parameters and rule determination.
We are having four condition tables i.e. most specific to most generic and condition records are maintained for all the key combinations, whereas system is picking up the record, which is most generic.
Please let me know how the system picks up the condition record in rule based atp check.
Thanks and Regards,
Sai Dacha
9849030809

Hi Anupam,
Please find the comments.
Can you also check your check instruction and see if it has
--> "Activate RBA" and "Start immediately" check box checked for the check mode you guys are using and business event A
Comment:
Both the check boxes are checked for the relevant combination.
If you have this setting then I would like you to check in master data where you have created Integrated Rules:
Comment:
I've maintained only one rule, which is in valid periods.
Make sure you have maintained integrated rules correctly and assigned the correct location determination procedure.
Comment:
Checked both Production Substitution and Location determination procedures and their assignments.
--> Very basic point but no harm in checking, sometimes we miss very basic things: Do you have all the locations in APO and also products at those location which you want to populate in the sales order.
Comments:
All the combinations of products and locations are in APO.
Thanks,
Sai Dacha

Rule based ATP check

Hello,
We are implementening rule based ATP check for Sales order scnerio. Our Business process is
1.Customer will cretate order for product P1 & Location L1.
If stock is available, system will confirm the order else it should search for alternate product & location in following swquence
2. Product P2, Location L1
3. Product P1, Location L2
4. Product P2, Location L2
We have maintained all the configuration as per SAP bulding block for Rule based ATP check in SAP & APO server.
Problem : If stock for requested Product location is not available, syetem does not propose the stock of alternate product & location as maintained in rule sequence. It gives error as :
"No product found" "Internal error: Item /000000"
Would appreciate if anyone can share information on fixing ths issue?
With Regards
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

hello
We have resolved the issue at our end..
It was due to activation of unwanted exit in APO..
Regards
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

SAP APO : GATP:Ruled Based ATP check :Location

System look for best CDD plant out of 3 plants
For example, there are 4 plants (P1, P2,and P3, ). All can not meet the RDD (say 1st July) of the customer, however lets say P2 can give the best CDD (5th July). System should choose P3. (May be in another inventory situation P3 can give the earliest CDD, system should then choose P3).
CDD:Commited Delivary date
RDD:Requestion Delivary Date
Let me the configration seting in ruled based ATP check and how to go about??

Hi,
maintian the following settings in the SCM APO Master data - Rule Maintenance -/SAPAPO/RBA04 - Integrated Rule Maintenance Maintain the following things here
By going to Profile and parameter
Maintain the Rule control, maintain rule control in this maintiain top from list for Location.
Maintain the location determintion activity here maintain Check mode and Business event.
Come back to first screen and maintain the
location dermination substitution here in the first line maintin the actual plant and maintain the remining plant in the follwing lines.
maintain the rule here maintain for the location determination procedure.
lastly you need to maintain create rule determination for the plant and rule.
Hoping you maintained al the SPRO settings
Regards,
T.Muthyalappa.

Char based GATP check

hi,
Is variant class mandatory for characteristic based gatp check?
If not, in case of MTS scenario, when a sales order is created, how ( and where) to specify the characeteristic value based on which ATP check is to be carried out?
Regards,
RS

Dear Tibor,
Thanks for your response...
I had already gone through the SAP help document. But still my question is a bit different. I will give an example.
A material is defined with batch class. No variant class is maintained.After production, customer number is maintained in the batch characteristic.
At the time of sales order creation, product availability check should take place based on the customer (sold to party) in the sales order by searching stock (with batches) in which the same customer is maintained as a characteristic value.
In short ......Is there any user exit for batch determination during product availability check ?
Regards,
RS
Edited by: sap_apo31 on Jan 6, 2012 1:05 PM

How to check whether a node exist in a Particular Level. (xmltype)

hi,
please help me to check whether a particular node exists in one level.
for eg
I have the following xml
<map>
     <entry>
          <key>
               heading1
               </key>
          <map>
               <entry>
                    <key> sub1 heading1</key>
                    <value> sub1 heading1 value </value>
               </entry>
               <entry>
                    <key> sub2 heading1 </key>
                    <value> sub2 heading1 value </value>
               </entry>
          </map>
     </entry>
     <entry>
          <key>
               heading2
               </key>
          <map>
               <entry>
                    <key> sub1 heading2</key>
                    <value> sub1 heading2 value </value>
               </entry>
               <entry>
                    <key> sub2 heading2 </key>
                    <value> sub2 heading2 value </value>
               </entry>
          </map>
     </entry>
</map>i need to check how many heading exists in this xml.
I am checking like
        i:=1;
     l_section := ip_xml.extract('//map/entry');
     WHILE l_section.existsnode('entry[' || i|| ']') = 1 LOOP
          // extract the key name within entry tag
              // print the key name.
i:=i+1;
     end loop;but iam getting all the key name like
heading1
sub1 heading1
sub2 heading1
heading2
sub1 heading2
sub2 heading2
I need only heading1 and heading2. how can I check whether a particular node exist in particular level.
first level , second level etc. Please help

but iam getting all the key nameThat's because you're using a descendant axis : //map/entry
SQL> DECLARE
2
3   ip_xml xmltype := xmltype('<map>
4      <entry>
5           <key>
6                heading1
7                </key>
8           <map>
9                <entry>
10                     <key> sub1 heading1</key>
11                     <value> sub1 heading1 value </value>
12                </entry>
13                <entry>
14                     <key> sub2 heading1 </key>
15                     <value> sub2 heading1 value </value>
16                </entry>
17           </map>
18      </entry>
19      <entry>
20           <key>
21                heading2
22                </key>
23           <map>
24                <entry>
25                     <key> sub1 heading2</key>
26                     <value> sub1 heading2 value </value>
27                </entry>
28                <entry>
29                     <key> sub2 heading2 </key>
30                     <value> sub2 heading2 value </value>
31                </entry>
32           </map>
33      </entry>
34 </map>');
35
36 BEGIN
37
38    for r in (
39      select heading, headno
40      from xmltable( '/map/entry/key'
41                     passing ip_xml
42                     columns heading varchar2(30) path '.'
43                           , headno for ordinality )
44    )
45    loop
46      dbms_output.put_line('Heading '||r.headno||' = '||r.heading);
47    end loop
48    ;
49
50 END;
51 /
Heading 1 =
               heading1
Heading 2 =
               heading2
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

GR Based IR checked in PO if SC amt exceed clip level amount

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for