Reverse incorrectly posted entries to commitment item - FM Module

Hello,
We had defined an incorrect commitment item in the G/L master and posted some documents for that G/L code which affected the FM module.
After realizing the mistake, we changed the G/L master for that G/L code to update the correct commitment item but by that time quite a few entries had been posted to the wrong commitment item in the FM module.
So we have a discrepancy in the FM module currently.
Is there any way to reverse the wrong entries within the FM module and re-post to the correct commitment item - without reversing the G/L entries?
Greatly appreciate your assistance.
Best Regards,
Vijay M.
Edited by: Vijay M on May 12, 2009 10:58 AM

Hi Naveen,
check the following tables
1. FMIFIHD - FM Header table in Fund management
2. FMIFIIT - FM Line item Table in Fund management
3. FMIT - Totals table for fund management
4. FMIA- Actual Line item table for Fund management
For the second point, i think you need to reverse the origin document and repost it with correct amount. There is no other option.
BR
Amitash

Similar Messages

  • Post Commitment Item & sponsor class to a group accounts

    Hello,
    In this area, Financial - Public Sector Magement - Funt Management
    Some body knows if it's possible restrict the posting of the commitment Item and the
    sponsor class to a group of accounts?
    Thanks,

    Hi Luis,
    Can you emphasize more on your request? The document chain is this that FI document generates FM entry (except for earmarked funds), so what restrictment are you looking for? If you do not want certain CI used with certain G/Ls (assuming that you do not derive CI, but enter it manually, which is not common), you can always use validations (OB28).
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Financial Transactions in commitment item

    Hi Gurus
    We are facing this error while entering the Goods receipt i.e MIGO
    Transaction for a import materail while trying to save the MIGO we are
    getting the error " Posting not Possible;Incorrect financial
    transactions of commitment item" We tried to change the financial
    transactions but still the system is showing the same error and not
    allowing us to save the MIGO.
    Please suggest some solution as it is very urgent issue and affecting our business operations.
    Regards
    chetan

    Hi,
    Use t.code: FS00 and check the GR/IR , Stock accounts and other G/L involves and  see what is the field status group , you have maintained for all G/L’s.
    Now use t.code: OBC4
    Select your field status variant & Click Filed Status Group TAB and check the Filed Status Group, what u have mentioned for the GR/IR ,Stock account & other G/L’s
    Go To additional account assignment segment and put optional entry for the commitment item and save.( hope for any one of your G/L, is it required entry, just change and make it optional)
    Now try ur transaction.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Error in Posting Service Entry Sheet - FI 311 No Commitment Item in Item 1

    Dear All,
    We need a suggestion/solution for the following problem :-
    Our customer had raised purchase orders for services in may 2010. The following critical entries were made in the purchase order.
    Account Assignment Category was P-Project
    The WBS element was entered as the Accounts Assigment Category was P.
    The user was entering uncoded services. Hence the material group for that service which had G/L a/c tagged to it was entered. But the G/l code was not populated in the purchase order by the system at that time of creation of purchase order and subsequently the user was able to save and release purchase order.
    The user was able to post Service Entry Sheet and generate accounting entries in june 2010.
    Additional service entry sheets are required to be posted for the remaining quantites. The client has urcated the SES process into two parts.
    1. Through T-code ZML81N the end user is able to create and save the SES.
    2. Through T-code ML81N the Head of Department is able to approve and post the SES which results in generating of accounting entries.
    Presently the user is able to create SES with tcode ZML81N. But when the HOD tries to approve and post the ses we get the error.
    FI 311 - No commitement item maintained in Item 0001 in P220 (company code).
    Fund Management is active in this company code and all settings related to Funds Management and FI have been checked by respective consultants.
    The end user is not having any problems in processing SES for current Pos. But he is not able to create SES for the POs created in May, 2010 for which the user has already created and posted more than one SES against the same POs.
    We have already escalated it to SAP.
    Thanks in advance
    Anil Shanbhag

    Hi,
    Use T.code:FS00 and check G/L account 280000 is there in your company code or not.
    If yes, check its nature(type/description,control data , cretae bank/intererst tabs)of G/L
    NOTE: Also check and compare the field selection between Movement type 101 & your G/L account 280000 in SE38 t.code with  Program RM07CUFA
    Regards,
    Biju

  • Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

    Hi to all,
    We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
    We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
    We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO  posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
    Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Y.Kiran Babu

    Hi,
    For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
    I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
    First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
    For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
    You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
    FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
    When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
    Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
    The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
    Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
    FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
    FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
    FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
    You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
    FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
    If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672.  This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines.  Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
    Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
    Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
    1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
    2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records.  However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
    If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
    3) Run reconstruction for AVC
    You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
        o  Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
        o  Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
           Control System (BCS)
    Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
    I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Incorrect Commitment item derived for GR/IR for service orders

    Hi Guys
    We are currently on support pack 14, release 200 of EA-PS. I'm experiencing problems in with FM account assignment derivation. Especially with regards to service entry sheets.
    The system is deriving account assignments well from goods reciepts to invoice reciept stage. The problem kicks in when clearing GR/IR - clearing using transaction code MR11. The system derives the expenditure commitment item using the GR/IR account in FI. I created assignments for my commitment items to be derived from G/L accounts as there is a one to one relationship between my G/L account and commitment item.
    This condition results in a debit and credit entry being posted to the same commitment item in one transaction. I would expect only one item to be posted to the expense commitment item as it is the only one in the two line document whose financial transaction field set to 30. The GR/IR commitment's financial field is set to 40.
    Regards
    Thuso Mudau.

    Hi,
    First thing I's do is to activate the FMDERIVE trace and see what is this commitment item derived from.
    See what GL accounts are posted in the financial doc, and have a look at the log to see if the commitment item is derived directly from those acocunts.
    Let me know the results...
    Shahaf Yaari

  • Commitment item error at the time of Service entry Sheet

    Hi experts,
    I have created a service PO, in which I have given the GL. Now when I am going to post the service entry sheet, I am changing the GL account. But system is picking the commitment item with reference to the GL earlier provided in PO.
    I want to pick the commitment item with reference to the GL I am providing in service entry sheet.
    Pl suggest how can I achieve this.
    Regards,
    Ankit Agarwal

    Hi Eli,
    Thanx for your response.
    But derivation rule is same for all GL. Whether we put GL in PO or in Service entry sheet, system will derive the commitment item from the same single rule.
    Regards,
    Ankit Agarwal

  • How to Change financial trasnactin for commitment item for which no trasnaction has been posted

    Hi ,
    1.
    \We re in process to Go live for he FUND Management module for Power generation business, while we create all  FM master data and budget structure we found a mistake in NONBUDGET commitment items. we wrongly mapped financial transaction 30, while changing it to 40 system showing following massage,
    Field "Fin.transaction" cannot be changed
        Message no. F6288
    Diagnosis
        You can no longer change the entry in field Fin.transaction as commitment
        item NONBUDGET in FM area SAPL and fiscal year  has already been defined
        as a budget object.
    System Response
        Field Fin.transaction is not changed.
    2. when we try to delete the commitment item system showing following error
    Commitment item NONBUDGET in FM area  and Fyear SAPL defined as a budget
    object
        Message no. F6206
    Diagnosis
        The commitment item NONBUDGET in the FM area SAPL and fiscal year  was
        defined as a budget object.
    System Response
        The chosen action was not executed.
    Procedure
        Remove the indentification Budget object in the budget structure.
    As per above error we check the following details
    1. FM deriver - Removed NONBUDGET from all the rule
    2. There is no Budget/ Posting in FM9k
    3. There is no activation of budget ( no golive)
    4 There is no data posted with the commitment Items

    Hi Jeetendra
    Try deleting the budget structure using FMBSBO_DEL.
    Thanks
    Shyam

  • "Message number: FI311: Any commitment item has been entried in the positio

    Hello,
    when I try to post a customer invoice with fb70 tx , and I have created a derivation rule : cost center-->fund center, and also the G/L account that I am using in the posting has a commmitment item assigned , but the system shows the next error:
    "Message number: FI311: Any commitment item has been entried in the position 00001 1000(Cocd)
    6001000200(G/L account).
    But in the tx Fb01, the system  run correctly and make the derivation
    Which is the problem , some note to implement ?
    Best Regards
    Olga

    Hi,
    When you post a document, all lines have to receive FM assignment. I believe, you are receiving this message on the line of the customer. Go to FMDERIVE, activate a trace and you will see if you have rules missing to derive FM object.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • ML81n reversal of GR entry posted

    Hi Experts,
    My client created a PO of value EUR100,000 and then made a service entry sheet of 36000. now while doing ML81n he choose PO and did the GR of total value EUR100,000, and then did IR of value EUR 100,000.
    Now since this was wrong, he reversed the IR and the reversal value was EUR 100000. When he tries to reverse the GR of EUR 100000 (entry posted through ML81n earlier) system takes the service entry sheet value i.e. 36000 which is wrong.
    Now I want to reverse this GR of value 100,000. I can't do it through MIGO (cancel GR option- system doesnt allow).
    How do we reversed the values posted through ML81n in such cases.
    Please advise.
    Thanks
    Neeraj

    Hi Neeraj,
    Please, take a look on SAP Note 856682, which explains how to proceed in this case.
    856682 Goods receipt document cancelled with incorrect
    Example 1:
        o  You accepted a service entry sheet for 2000.-.
           The goods receipt document was posted with 2000.-.
        o  You posted a partial invoice with the final invoice indicator for 100.-.
        o  You reverse the acceptance of the service entry sheet. The goods receipt reversal is posted with the value 100.-.
    Solution:
        o  Accept the service entry sheet again. The goods receipt document is posted with 100.-.
        o  Post an invoice with the final invoice indicator for the remaining amount of 1900.-
        o  Reverse both invoices.
        o  Cancel the acceptance of the service entry sheet. The goods receipt reversal is posted with 2000.-.
    => The total of the invoices and the total of the goods receipt
    documents are both 0.- in the purchase order history.
    Example 2:
        o  You accepted a service entry sheet for 2000.-.
           The goods receipt document was posted with 2000.-.
        o  You posted a partial invoice with final invoice indicator for 100.-.
        o  You cancel the invoice.
        o  You reverse the acceptance of the service entry sheet. The goods receipt reversal is posted with the value 100.-.
    Solution:
        o  Accept the service entry sheet again. The goods receipt document is posted with 2000.-.
        o  Post an invoice with final invoice indicators for 3900.- this value is calculated as follows:
           3900 = (value of the service entry sheet) + (difference between goods receipt posting and goods receipt reversal).
        o  Cancel the invoice.
        o  Reverse the acceptance of the service entry sheet. The goods receipt reversal is posted with 3900.-.
    => The total of the invoices and the total of the goods receipt
    documents are both 0.- in the purchase order history.
    Hope it  helped you to solve the issue.
    Best regards,
    Eduardo Junior

  • Commitment Item-Error while posting GR

    Hi MM Gurus
    I am tryin to post GR without PO for movement type 101.
    and already customized settings for Auto PO allowed for movement type 101.
    When i m tryin to save GR, it is showin me error
    " No Commitment Item Entered in item 00010 1000 379999"
    i dont knw how to solve this error..
    Error description Says, someone has activated funds management, cash budget management, or project cash management, therefore i must have to enter commitment item in all involved company code.
    so culd u pls let me knw whr exactly i have to enter this details for commitment item.
    Thanks a lot..
    Regards
    Jignesh

    Hi,
    This is due to lack of budget against the concerned item. Check the same against the commitment item as per the valuation class assigned for the item.This can be viewed in TCode FMRP_2FMB4002 .Ask your FI team for allocation of budget.
    Dhruba

  • How to reverse the cash journal posted entries in FBCJ

    Hi All
    In Cash journal (FBCJ) user has posted the document by mistakenly two times, is it possible to reverse the cash journal posted document. Please advise how to reverse the posted cash journal entries.
    Regards
    K.Gunasekar

    Hi,
    For reversing, select the line and then go to "Edit > Delete Entry (Shift+F2)" or "Delete Row" button at the bottom part of screen. (Deletion function reverse the document in FBCJ)
    However in case you are trying to reverse the entry after printing a receipt if you must implement OSS Note 359656 first:-
    [https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=359656]
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • How update Fund Center and Commitment Item after posting

    hi Experts,
    Funds management was activated during the year and hence there are few open items saved without capturing Fund Center and Commitment Item. When i tried to clear these open item i get the following error
    Line  in document xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx   does not contain any commitment items
    Is there any program which i can use to update derivation to the already posted line item
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
    Solutions proposed by Alexey are good if FM document was created for the FI documents in question. If, however, no FM document was created, reassignment process won't help. You can try FMN0 transaction after creating a derivation rule in FMDERIVE for these documents, but I cannot confirm that it would be sucessful as FMN0 transaction is not perfect.
    The solution could be updating FI tables (BSEG/BSIS/BSAS) with FM assignment (fund centre/commitment item) and only then running FMN0 transaction. In this case, FM document will be created and you'll be able to process the items.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Posting on commitment item when PO is created in SRM

    Hi,
    We use modules SRM and PSM - Funds Management.
    When we create a Purchase Order (PO) in SRM, the posting in FM on commitment items is different from when the PO is created in ERP.
    Example 1 - PO created in MM:
    PO
    FM - value type 51 (amount -1000)
    GR/IR
    FM - value type 51 (amount 1000)
    FM - valute type 54 (amount -1000)
    The value type goes from 51 to 54.
    Example 2 - PO created in SRM:
    PO
    FM - value type 51 (amount -1000)
    GR/IR
    FM - value type 51 (amount 1000)
    But here it doesn't convert to value type 54 for commitment item. Therefore we can't display it in for actual FM values.
    Does anyone know why it behaves differently for commitment item when the PO is created in SRM, instead of MM?
    With regards,
    Åse

    Hi Åse,
    There should not be any difference. I had a project with SRM and all FM documents were created properly. Do you refer to the fact that FM document is not created ( in FMIFIIT table) or you just do not see it in PO history? For the latter, you could look at this note 857761...
    If the FM document is not created at all, I'd open an OSS on that after checking in OFUP that GR updates FM.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • How to give commitment item while posting tax

    how to give commitment item while changing tax %.

    HI
    Commitment Item will be derived from the G/L account. You need not enter the commitment Item. Whenever u create a G/L account go to FMDERIVE and assign the G/L account to the commitment Item.
    Hope this helps. If it helps plz assign points.
    Regards
    Rajaram

Maybe you are looking for

  • Button not working in browser

    I am coding a video player in Netbeans 6.8. just find two problems: 1. the browser button not working in browser when I run the project from Netbeans under "run in browser" mode. however under "standard execution" mode, everything is fine. 2. can not

  • About finding good compression settings to email clips

    Hi all, I want an easy way to email something I'm working on, usually anything upto 60sec. Copying some of settings the edit assistants use to email to clients here's whast I'm doing: Aiming for end size of clip to be near to but not much more than 5

  • 3rd party tags and design view customization

    I know that Dreamweaver allows me to replace third party tags with images in design view. My question is can I make my jsp widget tags look dependent on attributes of that tag? And why can't I say that my <widget:suggestionBox - size="10" /> should l

  • Establishing BPM, SOA and Enterprise Architecture and 'Governance'

    Good day all, (Originally posted on LinkedIn Oracle BPM group) (This post can also apply to those implementing SOA and/or Enterprise Architecture) After reviewing Oracle's IT Strategies from Oracle (ITSO) reference library (http://www.oracle.com/tech

  • Seasons in MRP view

    Hi, My customer wants to view MRP in seasons wise. Is that possible in MRP screen? Please let me know if any method available in MRP.. Thanks, Rohith