GR IR value difference - Issue

Dear All,
I have done Goods reciept for 4 line items.then done the IV also.
Afterwards cancelled one GR document line item ie., 102 and posted withe the GRIR value of 90.34(-) AUD.
then I have done the posting of IV, after i done the IV if i see the following document the GRIR account has taken the value as 90.35(-).
I am not understanding why system has taken different value it., 0.01 AUD difference.
Also I have tried to post this difference by using MR11, system says the below msg -
"No (suitable) purchase order/item found"
Message no. M8 401
Can some body help me out why is this differenc amount has posted.
Secondly how to post this entry manually, as GRIR should post automatically, as I aware we can't post this manually unless we remove the posting automatically allowed in GL masters.
Please revert .
Thank you.
Regards,
Nagaraj S

HI,
Thanks for the reply.
How can we post this difference now.
Can you guide.
Regards,
NagarajS

Similar Messages

Value difference

hi,
in SD during pgi or billing, may i know if there will have value differene from sales order happens sometimes?
in MM, when there is a deviation of price between PO and standard price, the difference will be booked in price difference account.
I would like to know if pgi or billing time, will this happens?
thanks

hello...
1. you are correct. in accounting 1, the prices refer to cost of goods, either moving or standard. in accounting 2, they refer to how you value inventory (as per SAP, this may not apply to USA or Europe).
2. i think again they refer to inventory valuation. how you use these fields depend on the legal requirement of the specific project location. again, these may not apply in the USA or Europe.
3. since cost of goods in billing is taken from post goods issue, you can conclude there should be no difference. it is likely you will have value differences between the billing and the sales order (i.e. you create sales order, then you change the data in accounting 1 view of MMR, then deliver/PGI. system will get cost on date of PGI). however, costs in sales order do not yet have postings to accounting.
4. i would say that $50 was in accounting 1, and perhaps in purchase info. but $52.34 is actual purchase cost (MM) or production cost (PP). if you used moving average, then cost of goods will be taken from purchase data (moving average can apply to raw materials for finished goods which can still have standard costs. this subject you can find in other threads on the same subject. there is a good contribution from lakshmipathi).
regards.

Inventory value difference between SAP and leagcy system

Hello Gurus,
My client has inventory value difference in SAP and Legacy system during cutoff activities due to following reason.
a. Rounding off
b. GRN done
C. Goods issue done
Can I do the manual posting for Value difference?.if yes then how?
Please guide me on the same.
Regards
SAP FI

Hi
It is not just difference in Valuation...
1. If GRN is done in Legacy system, you will have to upload stock in SAP also
2. If Goods issue is done in Legacy system after you got the stock file, then you will also have to post Goods issue in SAP
The Qty uploaded should match between Legacy and SAP systemj... If the qty matches and difference is in value, you will have to decide which value is final i.e. Legacy value or SAP value.... Accordingly, you will have to pass a JV in Legacy system (If SAP value is Final) or in SAP system (If legacy value is final)
BR, Ajay M

Method to identify the value difference

Dear Experts,
We run a blocked invoices report (t-code ZMR0) from which the invoices are manually released. This report, among other details, is calculating and displaying the value difference for which the respective invoice got price blocked. As I know ZMR0 is calling MRBR in order to actually release the invoices.
Is there a way of extracting this value difference after the respective invoice(s) was released?
Thank you in advance for your help.

Hi,
Based on the your price control in the material master it will hit the price difference a/c if the price control is standard price
And if the price control is moving average price it will load to the materail inventory account is suffient stock is available
if partial stock is available it will partly load inventory and partly hit price difference account
So probably you will have cretae the another table to update this diiference when you run your Z report it will be difficult to get these
values from the system
Thanks
Diwakar

Tax value difference in FI document & report S_ALR_87012357

Hi Team
There is tax value difference in FI document and report S_ALR_87012357.why this difference come?
In FI Document GST input value S$414.89
In Report GST input value : S$3,599.34
Why these difference coming ? Please suggest..
Thank you
Regard,
Dharma.

HI ,
Its looks like thata document is posted in SGD which looks like document currency . VAT report if you haven't choose any currency then run in local currency . Its look like that which is different from SGD .
Can you Please click on TAx in document .
Many Thanks

Report - quantity and value difference between delivery and invoice?

Hello experts,
My client use u201EProof of deliveryu201D t-code: VLPOD. There is always quantity and value difference between delivery and invoice.
Do you know any report which will show this differences between delivery and invoice?
Best regards,
Maciej

Hi,
Note 867678 - Proof of delivery (POD), delivery and billing document will help you to understand POD flow.
You have the tcode VLPODF/VLPODL/VLPODA, but perhaps they will not help you. So, as the before note suggests you, you can use the tables VBFA, LIKP, LIPS, VBRK, VBRP, TVPOD and TVPODG to do your own report.
I hope this helps you
Regard,
Eduardo

Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

Hello Experts,
One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
SEZ
Calculation of import Duty
Input goods
Material Base Value
       2,171,385
Landing Cost
             21,714
For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
BED @
10%
           219,310
Loaded in material cost
CVD, @
12%
           289,489
Credit taken
Customs Education Cess
3%
             15,264
Loaded in material cost
ADDL Duty
4%
           108,686
Credit taken
Customs Duty
           632,749
CVD
12%
           219,310
All duty
4%
           108,686
Cenvat
           327,996
CST
       43,427.70
2214812.7
Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
Regards,
Vishal Jadhav

Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

Rebate Processing - Value Difference -Verfication level and Sales Volume

Dear All ,
We are using standard rebate process - Customer Rebates and we have encountered the following issue .
1. The Rebate agreement was created on 01/12/2010 with validity from 01/12/2001 , valid through 31/03/2010.The Rebate recipient was not activated for Rebate in the month of DEC 2009 and was activated on 15/01/2010 . We have executed VBOF and found that the Accruals are calculated from 15/01/2010 till date which is 25,010 USD ( for the invoices which are created from 15/01/2010) but it is not taken into consideration of the invoices which are created in the month of December 2009.
We have checked and calculated manually the accruals which is amounting to 35,575 USD for the period ( 01/12/2009 to 14/01/2010) . This accrual amount is not updated for the agreement .
Can any one give inputs on this issue.
Thanks in advance .
Regards
Veera
Edited by: veera PV on Mar 6, 2010 11:07 AM
Dear All ,
I have executed the VBOF couple of times and the sales volume is updated correctly now - 51,277.20 USD . but when i selected the agreement and clicked on verfication level it is not showing up all the invoices and the value shown is 43,025.10 USD . There is difference of 8252.10.
Now the issue is how do i get all the invoices in the verfication level.
Can any one give inputs on this .
Thanks in advance to all of you.
Regards
Veera
Edited by: veera PV on Mar 6, 2010 11:08 AM

Hello,
please check this thred Re: VBOF Issue related to updating Old Invoices after activating Rebate Check.
Best regards,
Ivano.

Accumulated Depreciation and Depreciation @ FY start is having value difference

Dear Team,
I am facing one issue in production. My client's depreciation @ F.Y end 31-12-2013 is 79,952.872 OMR.
When carry forwarded to next year beginning itself the value is getting changed to 79,968.382 OMR.
I run AFAR T-code ie re-calculate depreciation not getting any difference. Any suggestions on how to find out the difference. Your help is much appreciated on this issue.
Thanks & regards,
Geo George

Dear all,
Thanks for the suggestions and recommendations. I found out which asset caused the issue.
Net book value for the asset was 169.383 @ Fiscal Year start
It got changed to 153.873-. There by causing a difference of 15.510.
I also found out that legacy data transfer has happened for this asset for 15.510 on period 5 of 2013 and got posted on period 12 of 2013.
Please let me know how to proceed further.
Thanks & regards,
Geo George

SSRS : Reporting Services - Multi-Value Parameter Issue

Hi,
This problem is been around the blogs and forums for while now but may be it's not answered to the fullest. I couldn't get any satisfactory or completed solution on the issue so far, any clues/help will be highly appreciated.
My scenario is very simple :-
I am using SQL Server 2005 and SSRS. I need to develop a report which has a parameter value called Customer Name. The users should be able to select multiple customers from the list and sometimes Select All also. I tried the following :-
Created two data sets : Second dataset is just to populate the Customer Name
Created a Report Parameter and mapped with the query parameter where it says "Where CName in (@Parameter1)"
Nothing seems to be working although I tried to apply all the existing half-way solutions currently available in the forums. May be I am not getting to the right solution.
Here is what's happening :-
When used '?' like "where CName = ?" then it's working fine for the single value. {Multi value query cannot be used with ?}
But for multiple values when used @Parameter1 like "where CName in (@Parameter1)" it's giving the following error
Cannot add multi value query parameter '@Parameter1' for data set 'Dataset1' because it is not supported by the data extension.
However if commented this line it's pulling all the values whether or not selected from the parameter list.
This is the basic thing which I was not able to get the desired result, in addition I was looking to get the Customer Name parameter selected with a partial entry as we use LIKE. Example :- If the user enters 'St' in the text box the list should show all the names starting from those two letters
Starter
Steve
Steven
Stevenson etc.
I am not sure whether I'll will be able to get to this extent or not but until the multi value parameter, I am desperate to get the solution. So any sort of help/advise is highly appreciated.
Regards,

Hi,
This problem is been around the blogs and forums for while now but may be it's not answered to the fullest. I couldn't get any satisfactory or completed solution on the issue so far, any clues/help will be highly appreciated.
My scenario is very simple :-
I am using SQL Server 2005 and SSRS. I need to develop a report which has a parameter value called Customer Name. The users should be able to select multiple customers from the list and sometimes Select All also. I tried the following :-
Created two data sets : Second dataset is just to populate the Customer Name
Created a Report Parameter and mapped with the query parameter where it says "Where CName in (@Parameter1)"
Nothing seems to be working although I tried to apply all the existing half-way solutions currently available in the forums. May be I am not getting to the right solution.
Here is what's happening :-
When used '?' like "where CName = ?" then it's working fine for the single value. {Multi value query cannot be used with ?}
But for multiple values when used @Parameter1 like "where CName in (@Parameter1)" it's giving the following error
Cannot add multi value query parameter '@Parameter1' for data set 'Dataset1' because it is not supported by the data extension.
However if commented this line it's pulling all the values whether or not selected from the parameter list.
This is the basic thing which I was not able to get the desired result, in addition I was looking to get the Customer Name parameter selected with a partial entry as we use LIKE. Example :- If the user enters 'St' in the text box the list should show all the names starting from those two letters
Starter
Steve
Steven
Stevenson etc.
I am not sure whether I'll will be able to get to this extent or not but until the multi value parameter, I am desperate to get the solution. So any sort of help/advise is highly appreciated.
Regards,
you speak spanish

Data mart from two DSOs to one - Loosing values - Design issue

Dear BW experts,
I´m dealing with a design issue for which I would really appreciate any help and suggestions.
I will be as briefly as possible, and explain further based on the doubts , questions I received in order to make it easier go through this problem.
I have two standard DSOs (DSO #1 and #2) feeding a third DSO (DSO #3), also standard.
Each transformation DOES NOT include all fields, but only some of them.
One of the source DSO (let´s call it DSO #1) is uploaded with a datasource that allows reverse type of records (Record Mode = 'R'). Therefore some updates on DSO #1 comes with one entry with record mode 'R' and a 2nd entry with record mode = 'N' (new).
Both feeds are delta mode, and not the same entries are updated through each of them, but the entries that are updated can differ (means an specific entry (unique key values) could be update by one of the feeds, but no updates on the 2nd feed for that entry).
Issue we have: When a 'R' and 'N' entries happen in DSO #1 for any entry, that entry is also reversed and re created in the target DSO #3 (even being that not ALL fields are mapped in the transformation), and thefore we loose ALL the values that are exclusively updated through DSO #2, becoming blank.
I don´t know it we are missing something in our design, or how should we fix this issue we have.
Hope I was more or less clear with the description.
´d really appreciatted your feedback.
Thanks!!
Gustavo

Hi Gustavo
Two things I need to know.
1. Do you have any End Routine in your DSO? If yes, what is the setting under "Update behavior of End Routine Display"....Option available right side of Delete Button ater End Rouine.
2. Did you try with Full Load from DSO1 and DSO2 to DSO3? Do you face the same problem?
Regards
Anindya

GR IR value difference

GR IR value was showing difference.
in between quantity received and quantity invoiced .

Hi swathi swathi
You can benefit from M8 messages for incoming invoices with tolerances .
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal

Parameter Value passing issue to Web i report from Design Studio APP

Hi all,
I am trying to pass values to 2 parameters in a web I report called DIM1_REPORT and DIM2_REPORT. The values with space for example, Computer Sciences Corporation is getting passed as Computer\Sciences\Corporation Looks like the space is getting replaced with \ and as the values doesn't match the database values, no results are being retrieved. I tried using Convert.urlEncode function as well. But no luck still having same issue. Below is the URL,
"http://servername:8080/BOE/OpenDocument/opendoc/openDocument.jsp?sIDType=CUID&iDocID=AWD5NloJ4rVKoi2Y8m89GY0"+
"&lsMDIM1_REPORT=" + GLOBAL_SCRIPTS_1.DIM1_FILTER_SCRIPT() +
"&lsMDIM2_REPORT=" + GLOBAL_SCRIPTS_1.DIM2_FILTER_SCRIPT()
Has any one faced this issue and have a solution for this? Appreciate any help on this
Thanks
Nithin

Hi Mustafa,
Thanks for the response.
I tried to replace the \ with %20 using the following code
Convert.replaceAll(GLOBAL_SCRIPTS_1.DIM1_FILTER_SCRIPT(), "\ ", "%20");
But getting error in the script editor saying
I think \ is causing this issue. If I use any other character other than \ in search expression its not throwing any error in script editor. Any idea is \ considered as delimiter/break in design studio?
Any other way to fix this issue in design studio?
Thanks,
Nithin

Exchange rate difference issue

Hi SAP Gurus,
My client is facing one issue while receiving one payment in foreign currency. User is posting payment through F-28. Document currency is GBP and Local currency is EUR.   Excharge rate maintained in OB08 for GBP to EUR is 1.22137.
It is working fine for first five cases as showing below but for for sixth case system is showing wrong amount 4,968.30-
instead of 7646.58 in the document and the difference 2,678.28- is posting in Real.exchange gain local account in separate line.
278012   40          278012               38,682.10    47,245.16
1000029 15          198000                     3,133.26-    3,826.87-
1000029 15          198000                     4,352.00-    5,315.40-
1000029 15          198000                        244.04-      298.06-
1000029 15          198000                      3,823.77-    4,670.24-
1000029 15          198000                     20,868.38-   25,488.01-
1000029 15          198000                      6,260.65-    4,968.30-
828001   50          828001 Real. Exch.Gai         0.00     2,678.28-
828003   50          828003 Real. Exch.Gai         0.00         0.00
Does anybody knows why system is behaving like this. Many thanks in advance for your kind help.
Regards,

Are these the open items in one invoice or open items in different invoices? If they are in different invoices, you can check whether some invoices are not using currency GBP but other foreign currencies?
I met some case that if the invoice was posted in a different foreign currecy and in different payment period. The system will translate among 2 foreign currencies and local currency.
Good luck.
Emma

Date difference issue for Purchase order in R/3 and APO

Hi,
I am sending the purchase order from APO to R/3. When I transfer the data through CIF and see the curresponding entries in stock requirement list in R/3, purchase order is 1 day earlier than in SCM.
However, when this purchase order is CIFed back to SCM, date appears correct in SCM ( as what it was before). Is this something because of timezone that difference in date appears in SCM and R/3.
Can someone who came across date issues for transaction data transfer between SCM and R/3 elaborate in more detail please.
Thanks,
Sanjay

Hello Somnath ,
I am also facing the same issue which sanju was facing earlier in PRs .
In APO I am not able to understand how system calculates the opening , start and end date .In my case the transportation time is 48 hrs , planned delivery time is 1 day and all calenders are 5*24 , GR proceeeing time .01 day . When I am creating PR at destination location on 06/06/2008 , 24:00:00 Hrs . System calculates the dates as follows :-
Start date -06/05/2008 , 00:45:00 , end date -06/06/2008, 24:00:00 , opening date -05/20/2008 ,23:25:00 Hrs . I tried to understand the formula given by you in your reply as Opening Date = Requirement Due Date - GR Time - Planned Delivery Time
Start Date = Requirement Due Date - GR time - Transportation Duration
End date = Requirement Date.
But I am not getting the desired results.
Could you let me know why the system is behaving in such way.I also want to know does system can create orders in such a way the opening date lies in past. If yes then can we restrict that ?
Regards ,
Mukesh
Edited by: Mukesh Kumar on Mar 9, 2008 1:59 PM

GR IR value difference - Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for