GR IR value difference

GR IR value was showing difference.
in between quantity received and quantity invoiced .

Hi swathi swathi
You can benefit from M8 messages for incoming invoices with tolerances .
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal

Similar Messages

  • Method to identify the value difference

    Dear Experts,
    We run a blocked invoices report (t-code ZMR0) from which the invoices are manually released. This report, among other details, is calculating and displaying the value difference for which the respective invoice got price blocked. As I know ZMR0 is calling MRBR in order to actually release the invoices.
    Is there a way of extracting this value difference after the respective invoice(s) was released?
    Thank you in advance for your help.

    Hi,
    Based on the your price control in the material master it will hit the price difference a/c if the price control is standard price
    And if the price control is moving average price it will load to the materail inventory account is suffient stock is available
    if partial stock is available it will partly load inventory and partly hit price difference account
    So probably you will have cretae the another table to update this diiference when you run your Z report it will be difficult to get these
    values from the system
    Thanks
    Diwakar

  • Tax value difference in FI document & report S_ALR_87012357

    Hi Team
    There is tax value difference in FI document and report S_ALR_87012357.why this difference come?
    In FI Document GST input value S$414.89
    In Report GST input value : S$3,599.34
    Why these difference coming ? Please suggest..
    Thank you
    Regard,
    Dharma.

    HI ,
    Its looks like thata document is posted in SGD which looks like document currency . VAT report if you haven't choose any currency then run in local currency . Its look like that which is different from SGD .
    Can you Please click on TAx in document .
    Many Thanks

  • Value difference

    hi,
    in SD during pgi or billing, may i know if there will have value differene from sales order happens sometimes?
    in MM, when there is a deviation of price between PO and standard price, the difference will be booked in price difference account.
    I would like to know if pgi or billing time, will this happens?
    thanks

    hello...
    1.  you are correct.  in accounting 1, the prices refer to cost of goods, either moving or standard.  in accounting 2, they refer to how you value inventory (as per SAP, this may not apply to USA or Europe).
    2.  i think again they refer to inventory valuation.  how you use these fields depend on the legal requirement of the specific project location.  again, these may not apply in the USA or Europe.
    3.  since cost of goods in billing is taken from post goods issue, you can conclude there should be no difference.  it is likely you will have value differences between the billing and the sales order (i.e. you create sales order, then you change the data in accounting 1 view of MMR, then deliver/PGI.  system will get cost on date of PGI).  however, costs in sales order do not yet have postings to accounting.
    4.  i would say that $50 was in accounting 1, and perhaps in purchase info.  but $52.34 is actual purchase cost (MM) or production cost (PP).  if you used moving average, then cost of goods will be taken from purchase data (moving average can apply to raw materials for finished goods which can still have standard costs.  this subject you can find in other threads on the same subject.  there is a good contribution from lakshmipathi).
    regards.

  • Inventory value difference between SAP and leagcy system

    Hello Gurus,
    My client has inventory value difference in SAP and Legacy system during cutoff activities due to following reason.
    a. Rounding off
    b. GRN done
    C. Goods issue done
    Can I do the manual posting for Value difference?.if yes then how?
    Please guide me on the same.
    Regards
    SAP FI

    Hi
    It is not just difference in Valuation...
    1. If GRN is done in Legacy system, you will have to upload stock in SAP also
    2. If Goods issue is done in Legacy system after you got the stock file, then you will also have to post Goods issue in SAP
    The Qty uploaded should match between Legacy and SAP systemj...  If the qty matches and difference is in value, you will have to decide which value is final i.e. Legacy value or SAP value.... Accordingly, you will have to pass a JV in Legacy system (If SAP value is Final) or in SAP system (If legacy value is final)
    BR, Ajay M

  • Report - quantity and value difference between delivery and invoice?

    Hello experts,
    My client use u201EProof of deliveryu201D t-code: VLPOD. There is always quantity and value difference between delivery and invoice.
    Do you know any report which will show this differences between delivery and invoice?
    Best regards,
    Maciej

    Hi,
    Note 867678 - Proof of delivery (POD), delivery and billing document will help you to understand POD flow.
    You have the tcode VLPODF/VLPODL/VLPODA, but perhaps they will not help you. So, as the before note suggests you, you can use the tables VBFA, LIKP, LIPS, VBRK, VBRP, TVPOD and TVPODG to do your own report.
    I hope this helps you
    Regard,
    Eduardo

  • Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

    Hello Experts,
    One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
    SEZ
    Calculation of import Duty
    Input goods
    Material Base Value
           2,171,385
    Landing Cost
                 21,714
    For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
    BED @
    10%
               219,310
    Loaded in material cost
    CVD, @
    12%
               289,489
    Credit taken
    Customs Education Cess
    3%
                 15,264
    Loaded in material cost
    ADDL Duty
    4%
               108,686
    Credit taken
    Customs Duty
               632,749
    CVD
    12%
               219,310
    All duty
    4%
               108,686
    Cenvat
               327,996
    CST
           43,427.70
    2214812.7
    Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
    Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
    Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
    My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
    Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
    Regards,
    Vishal Jadhav

    Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

  • Rebate Processing -  Value Difference -Verfication level and Sales  Volume

    Dear All ,
    We are using standard rebate process - Customer Rebates   and we have encountered the following issue .
    1. The Rebate agreement was created on 01/12/2010 with validity from 01/12/2001 , valid through 31/03/2010.The Rebate recipient was not activated for Rebate  in the month of DEC 2009 and was activated  on 15/01/2010 . We have executed VBOF  and found that the Accruals are calculated from 15/01/2010 till date which is 25,010 USD ( for the invoices which are created from 15/01/2010) but it is not taken into consideration of the invoices which are created in the month of December 2009.
    We have checked and calculated manually the accruals which is amounting to 35,575 USD for the period ( 01/12/2009 to 14/01/2010) . This accrual  amount is not updated for the agreement .
    Can any one give inputs on this issue.
    Thanks in advance .
    Regards
    Veera
    Edited by: veera PV on Mar 6, 2010 11:07 AM
    Dear All ,
    I have executed the VBOF  couple of times and the sales volume is updated correctly  now - 51,277.20 USD . but when i selected the agreement  and clicked on verfication level it is not showing up all the invoices   and the value shown is 43,025.10 USD . There is  difference of 8252.10.
    Now the issue is how do i get all the invoices in the verfication level.
    Can any one give inputs on this  .
    Thanks in advance to all of you.
    Regards
    Veera
    Edited by: veera PV on Mar 6, 2010 11:08 AM

    Hello,
    please check this thred Re: VBOF Issue related to updating Old Invoices after activating Rebate Check.
    Best regards,
    Ivano.

  • NEF exposure value difference in Photoshop and Aperture

    We shoot paintings with a Nikon D2X and 4 SB-800 flash units. We keep a Macbeth in the frame until we get an LAB value of around 85-90 (RGB around 230, 230, 230) in the white patch. Until recently we have used Nikon Capture to control the camera and then opened the images in Photoshop (by way of Adobe Camera Raw) to read the exposure values. On our last shoot we moved to Aperture. Testing had previously shown a variation in the range of three LAB points for previously shot NEFs between Aperture's raw interpreter and Adobe Camera Raw. When we returned to the office and began to process the images we discovered that NEF files opened in Aperture showed the LAB exposure of 85-90 we saw in the field, but when the same NEF files are opened in Photoshop, the white patches are blown out. If we open them in Aperture and transfer them to Photoshop as TIFFs the exposure is the same as Aperture shows -- 85 to 90. As an experiment we opened one in Nikon Capture NX. The values match Photoshop and not Aperture.
    If anyone is interested in helping on the diagnosis, here is a link to one of our NEFs with the offending white patch:
    http://www.catalogueraisonne.org/tmp/2008-06-19_144.NEF
    Does anyone have an explanation of this huge difference of exposure values between Adobe and Capture NX on one side and Aperture on the other?

    Hi,
    Well I've downloaded your NEF file but I'm afraid I'm not seeing the difference that you are. I've loaded the image into Capture NX2, Aperture 2.1, and Lightroom 2 Beta (which is, in effect, using the ACR engine. There is a slight difference in values between them all, but only very slight. Aperture gives readings of 95.3% for luminance; LR gives me R:98%, G:99% and B:99% and Capture NX 2 gives me Readings that average 254 (which must be 99%). None of them are therefore technically blown out, however both LR and CNX2 show them the white patch as blown out if you switch on the lost highlights indicator. Aperture doesn't show them as blown out.
    So the difference range is a matter of 4% roughly, which I think can simply be put down to slight differences in RAW converters and the contract curves that they apply.

  • Value difference in parameter

    Hi,
    Db :11.2.0.2.0
    Os : Red hat
    While executing, i got the difference between show parameter nls_length_semantics and database_properties.
    SQL> show parameter nls_length_semantics
    NAME
    TYPE VALUE
    nls_length_semantics
    string CHAR
    select PROPERTY_NAME,PROPERTY_VALUE from database_properties where PROPERTY_NAME like 'NLS_LENGTH%';
    PROPERTY_NAME PROPERTY_VALUE
    NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS BYTE
    Anyone help me out.
    Thanks & Regards,
    VN

    What's the question?
    SQL> show parameter nls_length
    NAME                                TYPE        VALUE
    nls_length_semantics                 string      BYTE
    SQL> alter session set nls_length_semantics = 'CHAR';
    Session altered.
    SQL> show parameter nls_length
    NAME                                TYPE        VALUE
    nls_length_semantics                 string      CHAR
    SQL> select * from database_properties where property_name like 'NLS_LENGTH%';
    PROPERTY_NAME                 PROPERTY_VALUE                           DESCRIPTION
    NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS           BYTE                                     NLS length semantics
    SQL> It's not recommended to set this parameter to CHAR at the system level.
    See: Character length semantic recommendation

  • Accumulated Depreciation and Depreciation @ FY start is having value difference

    Dear Team,
    I am facing one issue in production. My client's depreciation @ F.Y end 31-12-2013 is 79,952.872 OMR.
    When carry forwarded to next year beginning itself the value is getting changed to 79,968.382 OMR.
    I run AFAR T-code ie re-calculate depreciation not getting any difference. Any suggestions on how to find out the difference. Your help is much appreciated on this issue.
    Thanks & regards,
    Geo George

    Dear all,
    Thanks for the suggestions and recommendations. I found out which asset caused the issue.
    Net book value for the asset was 169.383 @ Fiscal Year start
    It got changed to 153.873-. There by causing a difference of 15.510.
    I also found out that legacy data transfer has happened for this asset for 15.510 on period 5 of 2013 and got posted on period 12 of 2013.
    Please let me know how to proceed further.
    Thanks & regards,
    Geo George

  • GR IR value difference - Issue

    Dear All,
    I have done Goods reciept for 4 line items.then done the IV also.
    Afterwards cancelled one GR document line item  ie., 102 and posted withe the GRIR value of 90.34(-) AUD.
    then I have done the posting of IV, after i done the IV if i see the following document the GRIR account has taken the value as 90.35(-).
    I am not understanding why system has taken different value it., 0.01 AUD difference.
    Also I have tried to post this difference by using MR11, system says the below msg -
    "No (suitable) purchase order/item found"
    Message no. M8 401
    Can some body help me out why is this differenc amount has posted.
    Secondly how to post this entry manually, as GRIR should post automatically, as I aware we can't post this manually unless we remove the posting automatically allowed in GL masters.
    Please revert .
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj S

    HI,
    Thanks for the reply.
    How can we post this difference now.
    Can you guide.
    Regards,
    NagarajS

  • Cumulative values: difference between 3.5 and 7.0

    Hi everybody,
    I use queries which display an Amount on month.
    JAN FEB MAR APR
    A1  A2  A3  A4
    I modify the Key Figure property to have cumulated values
    JAN FEB   MAR      APR
    A1  A1A2 A1A2A3 A1A2A3A4
    In Bex 7.0, all is right i have my cumulated values
    In Bex 3.5, it doesn't work ...
    i have the following result:
    JAN FEB MAR APR
    1   3   6   10   ...
    as if i had:
    JAN=>Amount=1   JAN-> 1
    FEB=>Amount=2   FEB-> 1+2 =3
    MAR=>Amount=3   MAR-> 123 = 6
    Why this difference between 3.5 and 7 ?
    I  would like the right result in 3.5,
    How do i proceed ?
    Thanks for your help!
    Rodolphe.

    Appararently,
    On Bex 3.5 ...
    I remplace for my KeyFigure:
    Calculate Single Values As ...
    "Counting All values" by "Nothing"
    and option cumulated activated.
    and it does work !!
    Rodolphe.

  • Custom MIRO and GRN duty value difference

    Dear Guru's
    When MIRO is done, the custom duty clearing for  INR 6,821,482.80.
    When GRN is done for above, the Custom Duty clearing in GRN doc is for INR 6,828,297.31.
    There is a difference of INR 6,814.51, small difference in each custom duty between Custom MIRO and GRN.
    Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
    Edited by: sanjay.s on Dec 17, 2010 12:36 PM

    if you make Goods receipt with respect to PO with movement type 101 that is GRN.
    If you make the reverse posting of the above with movement type 102 then it is cancellation of GRN, the it will pick entire amount.
    If you maintains moving average price for that material it pick the   price available at time of reversal or cancelation

  • Material Value difference between FI and MM

    Dear Experts,
    The balance of perticular material not matiching with my FI gl balance (MC.9 and FBL3N). I am getting FI balance from FBL3N amd sort it by the meterial.
    Now how I reconcile the difference amount.
    Sourav
    FICO Consultant

    Dear:
                  We once faced the same issue and were manged to resolve it. We first sorted all GLs in which postings are routed through MM. No direct entry is allowed in these GLs. Documents types are set by default e.g WE for good receipts e.t.c. Then we executed these GLs in FS04 to track the changes made in their GL master for checking post automatically tick removal . We found some GLs in which post automatically tick was removed for sometime and some manual adjustment were posted into them by CO module. If you find any such changes in GL master record ,then select these GLs and execute them in FBL3N , look for any abnormal posting with different document type like SA e.t.c. In this way you can do the reconciliation between material ledger and FI ledger.
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for