GR55 (6PA2) vs S_ALR_87013557

Can anyone explain to me the logic behind report group 6PA2 and how this relates to S_ALR_87013557?
Coz I got some issue here, the report in 6PA2 doesnt show records while in S_ALR_87013557 reports the value is there.
Please any input will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Jojo

Hi Paul,
Thanks for your input, but I want to know why the (6PA2 - WBS Element: Act/Commit/Total/Plan) doesnt contain any data?
Is the record shows in S_ALR_87013557 also shown in 6PA2? is there any exception on the records to show in the 6PA2?
Or anyone can give me some documentation regarding this?
Thanks
Jojo

Similar Messages

  • Difference in S_ALR_87013557 Report and CJI3 Report for Actual Values

    Hi,
    I have created a Project & booked some cost on against WBS Elements. Now when see CJI3 report it shows correct values but in S_ALR_87013557 it shows different value for Actual-Overall. This value is slightly greater than the actual value.
    Please tell me how to resolve this issue?
    Thanks,
    Sandeep.

    Hi,
       CJI3 is a cost element report and S_alr......... is a Heirarchial report which will work on Value categories.
    This may be due inconsistencies in cost either by value categories or by some other way.
    Run CJEN and CJBN then check the report. still the problem persists.
    check the value categories in the IMG whether you have maintained all the cost elements that are used while posting to wbs and check whether there is any diplucation of cost elements by the transaction 'Check Consistency of Value Category' which is available in IMG.
    Navigation IMG>Project System>Costs-->Value Categories.
    Rgds
    Sudhir reddy

  • Cleared items on 31.05.11 is shown in the report S_ALR_87013344(GR55, 8A99)

    Hi
    The user has cleared the vendor account on 31.05.2011 but when he executes the transaction code S_ALR_87013344 vendor open items for profit center he still sees on the 31.05.2011 in this report. That means it is open item on profit center. But in FBL1N 31.05.2011 it is shown as cleared item.
    Is it standard behavior of the transaction code S_ALR_87013344(GR55, 8A99)
    Thanks in advance
    Best regards
    Chaithra

    Please read this whole message before doing anything.
    This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
    The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, by a font conflict, or by corruption of the file system or of certain system caches.
    Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards, if applicable. Start up in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. You must hold down the shift key twice: once when you turn on the computer, and again when you log in.
    Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the startup volume is a Fusion Drive or a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
    Safe mode is much slower to start up and run than normal, with limited graphics performance, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain models. The next normal startup may also be somewhat slow.
    The login screen appears even if you usually login automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin.
    Test while in safe mode. Same problem?
    After testing, restart as usual (not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

  • How to run GR55 reports in background for cost center hierarchies

    1.  I have been asked by our users to create batch jobs to run in the background for some GR55 reports, that can then be sent directly to cost center managers via email.
    I have figured out the process to do this as long as the cost center manager only needs to see a single cost center at a time.  However, if they are in charge of multiple cost centers, we also want to send them a summarized report using the hierarchy we have set up.  I can't seem to make this work, as the job only seem to recognize the last cost center in the group and the report is for that cost center.
    Example.  cost centers 100, 200 and 300 belong to hierarchy abc.  If I run the job just for cost center 100 it is fine.  But if I have a variant to run hierarchy abc, or even if I use the range 100 to 300, all I get is a report for cost center 300.
    We cannot use BW because we only have revenue in BW.  I am being asked to make this work from standard R/3 within the GR55 realm of reporting.
    2.  In addition, the report selection criteria includes two separate plan/forecast versions.  They need to update these each month prior to running the reports and sending them out.  I looked at the variables associated with the versions and tried to set them up with default values that I hoped would update automatically so that they don't have to manually change 50 or so variants each month.  But I don't see any dynamic variables that I can use to have the system make that change without going into each variant individually.
    3.  There is another piece to this equation as well.  There is another report they want sent out in batch, but it is several pages wide in SAP and several pages long.  So when you run it in batch and either spool it or get it sent as an email, it is very ugly in the formatting due to all the page splits horizontally and vertically.  If anyone knows how to get the report to stay together like it would if you had excel integration turned on, it would be very helpful.  I have tried running it with that integration turned on, but the jobs are set up with user batch_mgr and not my id, so it isn't working well.  The batch_mgr id is just a system id, not a dialog id.  We also don't want the jobs set up with a regular user id because if people leave, then the jobs all need to be changed.

    Kim,
    I may have options for issues 1 and 2. In case of 3, what I can tell you is I understand the concern, but this is what  typically happens in some standard CO reports that are not ALV compatible, I don't think there is not much  there to do unless you add some custom code for the output.
    In regards to point 1, yes,  I have noticed that this happens in some standard and custom reporting, not sure what is going on. I came up with a work around that  made the trick for my client in a similar scenario; which is editing the cost center groups. For instance, instead  of having the group set as a range from 100 to 300,  the groups are have  listed the cost centers, 100, 200 and 300. Obviously, the disadvantage of  this option is  that it would require a bit of more cost center group maintenance.
    In regards to point 2,  I understand from your note  that your users already have set up selection variants for the report. One option for you is to get the help from a developer to create a custom period variable and tiny program that runs in batch every month that would update that variable accordingly. Once that's done, you may have to update at least once, the selection variant  attributes to change the period to a selection variable, so everytime from that point of time forward that the variable gets updated,  it will be ready with the right value for every selection variant that uses it.
    Hope this helps.
    GG

  • Report group ( Trans. GR55 and GR51)

    We have different SAP instances or servers. I need to create a new report group in a server called Fusion. Those report group already exists in the company but there are in other server called PRMO.
    I went to PRMO to take a look to the report group configuration, and then i went in Fusion thru the transaction GR55 and GR51 to create the same report groups, but i can´t replicate the configuration, because in Fusion does not exists the table ZZHPPRT
    and also does not exist the library ZRP.
    Do you have any suggestions? Am i supposed to create these table and library in the server? How can i do that?
    Thanks for your help.

    Hi
    Export the library from the server where it exists using GR27
    and import into the other server using GR28
    similarly you can export and import reports using GR37/GR38
    report groups using Gr57/Gr58
    Regards
    Sachin
    Edited by: Sachin Bhutani on Sep 23, 2009 3:30 AM

  • Search t-code of report group in GR55

    Dear Experts,
    How can i search t-code of report group in GR55;
    for example :
    The report group: 6OI2 in T-code: gr55 is bound wtih t-code : S_ALR_87013003 ;
    Br
    Sophie

    Hi Sophie,
    In table TSTCP, maintain the parameters field with RWD_SREPOVARI-REPORT6OI2 and execute. You may see multiple transactions assigned to GR55 report 6OI2. You can replace 6OI2 with other report groups to find report painter/writer transactions in SAP.
    RWD_SREPOVARI-REPORT*6OI2* means -
    RW - Report Type
    SREPOVARI - Table that stores Reports and Variants
    REPORT - Name of Report
    There are many ways to find a transaction assignment, i guess this is an easier one for report painter transactions.
    Best Regards,
    Venkata Ganesh Perumalla

  • How to create Report group in GR55

    Hi gurus,
    I have to create new report group for special purpose ledger for getting report in GR55 please assist me how to create the new report group?
    Initiatives are highly appreciated and rewards with points.
    Regards
    Chandra

    Hi,
    Use trns code GR55 then go to menu "Report group" there u can find create ,change and display options.
    Regards,
    Krishna

  • Difficulty in adding new parameter in selection screen of GR55 report

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a requirement to add an extra field in Cost center:Act/Plan/Comm CC Cur report.This is otherwise a Z report in report painter with 0% code (T-code : GR55-> Report group->Report).But,when we go to technical information of this report,it has four standard sap programs,which contains code for this selection screen.It does not even have a modification scope.
    Selection screen of this report contains following parameters:
    Selection values:
    Controlling Ar
    Fiscal Year
    From Period
    To Period
    Plan Version
    Selection Groups:
    Cost Center Group
    Or value(s)
    Cost Element Group
    Or value(s)
    My requirement is to add one more parameter : Purchase oeder in new block:
    Is there any way to achieve it.
    Note: Copying the standard progs into custom prog is not working,i already tried that.
    Please let me know your suggestions,if any one of you came across such requirement before.it is very impoertant for me.
    Thanks in advance,
    Meenakshi

    Hi  meenakshi239,
    you can always use implicit enhancement spots.
    Regards,
    Clemens

  • Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

    Hi,
    Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
    I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
    Could you suggest on this issue.
    Thank you for your cooperation.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

  • GR55 - report generates no data for some of the cost elements

    Hi
    When executing GR55 for Monthly cost center analysis (target currency), the report generated has values for all the cost elements in the report. However, few cost elements do not show amounts. The amount columns show a ××××.
    Please suggest on why the system is not displaying the values only for few cost elements when running GR55 for report group CCPA (Cost center Actual vs Plan).
    Thanks
    Neetar

    Dear Neeta,
    Every customized report generated in Report painter will have a base as Form, were you do your customizing to get the report.
    So might be in some places the value key figure would have not properly customized.
    Check the report in T.Code GRR3 and see the places where you get XXXX.
    Hope it clarifies your doubt.
    Thanks and regards
    Praveen.J

  • How to make profit centre restriction in GR55 reports.

    Hello,
    I am facing one problem, in the systems when users are using reports from gr55 transactions they are able to see the figures or data from other profit centre.
    these users have roles which have profit center restrictions. but still they are able to see the data of different profit centre.
    Any budy tell me which outhorization object need to be modified.to put  profit center restrictions on the transaction.(GR55).
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

    > But before that, you need to change the check indicator for these objects from Check to Check-Maintain in SU24.
    That wont change much from an access perspective. It only changes the PFCG proposals and generates urban legends...
    You need to make the generated tcode known to the system (see [SAP Note|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1254159] and check it.
    Which object you check is freely definably in coding (with all consequences of not doing so..).
    Im my opinion, reporting belongs in a BI system anyway... There you can use granular and flexible concepts.
    Transaction systems are for FB01...:-)
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • GR55 Report Takes long time.

    Hi experts,
    System Details: ECC 6.0; Windows 2008 R2; MS SQL 2005 Database.
    Archiving is done and now when our functional team is running the GR55 to access data, it is taking a hell lot of time to bring-out the data. They have approached the Basis team (me included) for help.
    Probable Solutions I think, but not confirmed,
    1. The report may be doing some sequential read.
    2. The table which it is trying to access has some indexing issues.
    3. May be, the PBS server issue.
    Any comments, suggestions or rectifications are welcome. Please help.

    Another update, as per the rdisp/max_wprun_time is set to 3600 secs in our PRD, so when the GR55 will take more than 1 hour it will throw an error, as it is accessing all the archived data and surely it will take a lot of time. Furthermore, it's not advisable to increase the runtime.
    Anyways, it is also not possible to run it in background, as the team tried. So guys please please please help me out!

  • GR55/FS10N diffrenec

    Hi All,
    There is a difference in bet ween GR55 and FS10N transactions from 2004 8th period now users asking us to find out the problem. is it possible to make wquel ? if yes yes then can some one gime an idea. we can not displaythat GL account 300000 line items also because it is a recon a/c. could you please provide us the tables so that i can check line items.
    Fyi:  GR55 Show's more than FS10N  is it possible to make equel. if yes then please let me know.
    Regards
    JC
    Double-post

    Hi,
    I had the same issue and in the same year as yours.  I was able to narrow down where the differences were coming from using transaction code GCAC.  I compared the ledger in the report GR55 to legder BB for the account number in question. Then click on Other Key Figure  where I choose difference currency types to compare.
    This however happened for only one company which is in Canada.  The most is interesting thing is that, when you change the currency type you use in the report, you are likely to see no differences when you compare GR55 and FS10N.
    Was I able to resolve it any other way?  The answer is no.  If you are still unable to resolve it and your users are still asking for answers, ask them to make a journal entry to effect the error.  After all it is 2004.  ...............and remember is not everything you can have answers to.
    Regards,
    Elias

  • GR55,FS10N Diff

    Hi All,
    There is a difference in bet ween GR55 and FS10N transactions from 2004 8th period now users asking us to find out the problem. is it possible ? if yes yes then can some one gime an idea. we can not displaythat GL account 300000 line items also because it is a recon a/c. could you please provide us the tables so that i can check line items.
    Regards
    JC

    Hi,
    I had the same issue and in the same year as yours.  I was able to narrow down where the differences were coming from using transaction code GCAC.  I compared the ledger in the report GR55 to legder BB for the account number in question. Then click on Other Key Figure  where I choose difference currency types to compare.
    This however happened for only one company which is in Canada.  The most is interesting thing is that, when you change the currency type you use in the report, you are likely to see no differences when you compare GR55 and FS10N.
    Was I able to resolve it any other way?  The answer is no.  If you are still unable to resolve it and your users are still asking for answers, ask them to make a journal entry to effect the error.  After all it is 2004.  ...............and remember is not everything you can have answers to.
    Regards,
    Elias

  • Background job only sends 1 spooljob of report in gr55 ?

    in gr55 we want to run a report in the background and send it by email to the user.
    we noticed that by running in forground we get like 10 pages of output but as we schedule it in sm37 with the same variant that the user only receives 1 page. I noticed that the report is seperated in several spooljobs and 1 of the spooljobs contains the result received.
    is it possible to combine it into 1 spooljob or to sent more than 1 attachment into the mail with sm37 ?
    I try to combine it in the printersettings for the report but that doesn't work ?
    any other options ?
    kind regards
    Arthur de Smidt

    Hello,
    If a job is defined by transaction SM36, the print format parameters will only be taken into account, if they are saved as user specific print parameters of the batch user. If no user specific print format
    is defined,  the ALV standard logic will be processed adjusting the print format to the actual line size of the report.
    For example, the list line size is about 132 characters, the widest available format of the chosen printer will be selected X_65_132.
    The problem would be solved by defining a device type which is no format assigned to print, or by defining user specific print format parameters for the batch user, who creates the jobs in SM36 (see
    SAP note 1179399, item 6).
    Regards,
    David

Maybe you are looking for